Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Muhammed Tawfiq Ladan, Managing Diversities for Peaceful Co-Existence in a Democratic Nigeria: A Human Rights Perspective, (August 20, 2013).
• Andrew Koppelman, 'Freedom of the Church' and the Authority of the State, (Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, Forthcoming).
• Stephen M. Bainbridge, Must Salmon Love Meinhard? Agape and Partnership Fiduciary Duties, (UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 13-17, 2013).
• Perry Dane, Nature, Equality, and Same-Sex Marriage, (Buffalo Law Review Forthcoming).
• Benjamin L. Berger, Religious Diversity, Education, and the 'Crisis' in State Neutrality, (Canadian Journal of Law and Society, Forthcoming).

From SmartCILP:

• Julia Halloran McLaughlin, Taking Religion Out of Civil Divorce, 65 Rutgers Law Review 395-446 (2013).
• Symposium. In Search of a 'Grand Unified Theory': Thirty Years with the Endorsement Test. Articles by Carl H. Esbeck, Edward M. Gaffney, Jr., Patrick M. Garry, William M. Janssen and Andrew Koppelman. 7 Charleston Law Review 607-725 (2013).

Recent  Books:

• Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, The Devil That Never Dies: The Rise and Threat of Global Antisemitism (Little Brown, Sept. 2013), reviewed by the New York Times.
• Robert L. LaCosta, Gamaliel’s Advice: Taking Down God, (WestBow Press, June 2013), reviewed by the La Jolla Light.
• Denise A. Spellberg, Thomas Jefferson's Qur'an: Islam and the Founders, (Knopf, Oct. 1, 2013).

9th Circuit Hears Oral Arguments By Proposition 8 Backers For Disclosure Exemption

On Friday, the U.S.9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. Bowen. (Audio of full arguments.) As reported by the San Francisco Chronicle, at issue is the attempt by backers of California's 2008 Proposition 8 to avoid California's required filing of the names of contributors of $100 or more to the campaign to pass the now-overturned Prop 8 ban on same-sex marriage. Appellants say that backers have already suffered vandalism, hate mail, boycotts and death threats. While the names of contributors have already been released by state court order, appellants want the federal court to order the state to remove the names from its website, seal its files, and grant a filing exemption for future elections.

New Jersey Judge Refuses Stay Pending Appeal of Same-Sex Marriage Ruling

A New Jersey trial court judge yesterday refused to grant a stay pending appeal of her decision that beginning Oct. 21,  New Jersey must extend the right to marry to same-sex couples. (See prior posting.)  According to the New York Times, in her decision Judge Mary C. Jacobson wrote that the state had not shown that is is likely to succeed on appeal, and a stay would delay the ability of same-sex couples to become eligible for federal tax and retirement benefits, spousal coverage under Medicare and the ability to sponsor a non-citizen spouse for residency.  The state immediately appealed the denial of a stay.

UPDATE:  The New Jersey Supreme Court on Oct. 11 issued an order granting a direct expedited appeal of the decision, and also taking jurisdiction over the motion to stay pending appeal. [Thanks to Volokh Conspiracy for the lead,]

Mennonite Art Gallery Owners Sue State Civil Rights Commission Over Hosting Same-Sex Marriages

A lawsuit was filed this week in an Iowa state trial court by a Mennonite couple who are seeking to prevent the Iowa Civil Rights Commission from moving ahead on a complaint that the couple refused to host a same-sex wedding ceremony in their art gallery in violation of the ban on discrimination in public accommodations.  The complaint (full text) in Odgaard v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission, (IA Dist.Ct., filed 10/7/2013) explains that the art gallery is housed in a former Lutheran Church building.  The primary revenue source for the Odegaard's gallery (a sole proprietorship) is planning, facilitating and hosting wedding ceremonies in the former sanctuary of the church building which still retains its original stained glass windows. The Odegaards allege that their "religious beliefs forbid them from planning, facilitating, or hosting wedding ceremonies that contradict their religious understanding of marriage."  In addition to alleging that requiring them to either host same-sex weddings or stop hosting all weddings violates religious exercise and free speech provisions of the state and U.S. constitutions, plaintiffs also rely on a provision in the state Civil Rights Act providing that the Act "shall not be construed to allow marriage between persons of the same sex...." Becket Fund announced the filing of the lawsuit, and Christian Post reports further on the suit.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Louis J. Sirico, Benjamin Franklin, Prayer, and the Constitutional Convention: History as Narrative, (Legal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD, Vol. 10, 2013).
• Jeff Redding, Querying Edith Windsor, Querying Equality, (Villanova Law Review, Vol. 59, 2013).
• Avishalom Westreich & Pinhas Shifman, A Civil Legal Framework for Marriage and Divorce in Israel, (The Metzilah Center for Zionist, Jewish, Liberal and Humanist Thought, Ruth Gavison, ed, May 2013).
• Tamir Moustafa, Judging in God's Name: State Power, Secularism, and the Politics of Islamic Law in Malaysia, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 2, (2013)).
• Audrey Macklin, Multiculturalism Meets Privatisation: The Case of Faith-Based Arbitration, (International Journal of Law in Context, 9,3 pp. 1-23 (2013)).
• Bernard M. Levinson & Jeffrey Stackert, Between the Covenant Code and Esarhaddon's Succession Treaty: Deuteronomy 13 and the Composition of Deuteronomy, (Journal of Ancient Judaism 3 (2012): 123-140).
• Claudia E. Haupt, Active Symbols, (55 Boston College Law Review (forthcoming 2014)).
• Hamid Harasani, Islamic Law of Wills: An Overview, (October 1, 2012).
• William Baude, Interstate Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage after Windsor, NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, Vol. 8, 2013, Forthcoming. 

From SmartCILP:

• Hanna Lerner, The Political Infeasibility of "Thin" Constitutions: Lessons from 2003-2006 Israeli Constitutional Debates, [Abstract], 22 Journal of Transnational Law &Policy 85-121 (2012-2013).
• Bashar H. Malkawi, Shari'ah Board in the Governance Structure of Islamic Financial Institutions, [Abstract], 61 American Journal of Comparative Law 539-577 (2013).
• Daniel W. Morton-Bentley, Seeing Isn't Believing: Ahlquist v. City of Cranston and the Constitutionality of Religious Displays under the Establishment Clause, [Abstract], 18 Roger Williams University Law Review 172-199 (2013).
• Symposium on Overlapping Jurisdictions: What Role for Conscience and Religion?, Foreword by Michael J. DeBoer; articles by John Witte, Jr., Joel A. Nichols, Robert L. McFarland and Elizabeth Sepper; responses by Paul Horwitz, Jonathan F. Will and Jeffrey B. Hammond. 4 Faulkner Law Review 299-444 (2013).

Pennsylvania Same-Sex Marriage Ban Challenged In State Court

The Legal Intelligencer reported last week that 21 couples have filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania's Commonwealth Court challenging the constitutionality of the state's ban on same-sex marriage.  The suit comes on the heels of  a challenge in federal court filed in July by the ACLU. (See prior posting.) Plaintiffs in the most recent case are couples who were issued marriage licences by Montgomery County clerk D. Bruce Hanes who began issuing them in July, despite the ban in state law. (See prior posting.)

In Illinois Challenge To Same-Sex Marriage Ban, Court Allows Further Proceedings On Equal Protection and Due Process Challenges

In Darby v. Orr, (IL Cir. Ct., Sept. 27, 2013), an Illinois state trial court gave a substantial victory to proponents of same-sex marriage in the state.  First the court held that the same-sex marriage ban is not facially neutral and that plaintiffs have alleged facts which, if proven at trial, would establish that they belong to a suspect or quasi-suspect class protected by the state constitution's equal protection clause.  It also allowed plaintiffs to move ahead on their due process challenge, holding that "the present case allows the Illinois courts to consider, for the first time, whether the concept of choice as an aspect of the fundamental right to marry ... might apply to same-sex couples seeking to marry." The court however dismissed plaintiffs claims that the same-sex marriage ban amounts to unconstitutional sex discrimination, violates the right to privacy protected by the state constitution and violates the special legislation ban in the state constitution. The Chicago Tribune reports on the decision.

New Jersey Trial Court Says State Equal Protection Guarantee Requires Allowing Same-Sex Marriage; Appeal Planned

In Garden State Equality v. Dow, (NJ Super. Ct., Sept. 27, 2013), a New Jersey State trial court held that after the U.S. Supreme Court's Windsor decision extending federal spousal benefits to same-sex married couples (but not to couples merely in civil unions), the equal protection guaranties of the New Jersey state constitution requires the state to extend the right to marry to same-sex couples. Previously New Jersey only recognized civil unions. The court ordered that its decision not take effect until Oct. 21 in order to give the state time to either effectuate or appeal the ruling. Friday's New Jersey Star-Ledger reports on the decision. According to PolitickerNJ on Friday, a spokesman for New Jersey Governor Chris Christie said that the administration would appeal the ruling to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

Court Says Spousal Privilege Does Not Apply To Couple In Civil Union

In Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Clary, (KY Cir. Ct., Sept. 23, 2013), a Kentucky trial court refused to apply the spousal privilege of Kentucky Rule of Evidence 504 to a couple who are parties to a Vermont civil union.  Under the rule, a spouse may refuse to testify, or prevent his or her spouse from testifying, about events occurring after the date of their marriage.  According to the Louisville Courier Journal, prosecutors trying Bobi Jo Clary for murder claim that her partner Geneva Case heard her admit to killing the victim, and saw Clary clean blood out of the victim's van and abandon it. The court explained that it need not decide whether the privilege must be applied to same-sex married couples since here the parties were only in a civil union.  Even though Vermont now recognizes same-sex marriage, the parties to a civil union in Vermont are required to take specified steps to convert the civil union to a marriage even for Vermont to recognize it. [Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.]

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Paul Horwitz, Rethinking the Law, Not Abandoning It: A Comment on 'Overlapping Jurisdictions', (4 Faulkner Law Review 351 (2013)).
• Jordan J. Ballor, The Ecumenical Challenge of Catholicity, (Journal of Christian Legal Thought 3, No. 2 (Fall 2013)).
• Caroline Mala Corbin, Corporate Religious Liberty, (September 18, 2013).
• Frederick Mark Gedicks & Rebecca G. Van Tassell, RFRA Exemptions from the Contraception Mandate: An Unconstitutional Accommodation of Religion,(September 19, 2013).
• Dhrubajyoti Bhattacharya, At the Intersection of Law, Human Rights, and Religion, (Global Health Disputes and Disparities (Routledge, London: 2012)).
• Helen J. Knowles, Taking Justice Kennedy Seriously: Why Windsor Was Decided 'Quite Apart from Principles of Federalism', (September 1, 2013).
• Julien Mailland, The Blues Brothers and the American Constitutional Protection of Hate Speech: Teaching the Meaning of the First Amendment to Foreign Audiences, (Michigan State International Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 451, 2013).
• Douglas NeJaime, Windsor's Right to Marry, (123 Yale Law Journal Online 219 (2013)).
• Jade Wong & Andreas Ortmann, Do Donors Care about the Price of Giving? A Review of the Evidence, with some Theory to Organize It, (UNSW Australian School of Business Research Paper No. 2013-22 (2013)). 

From SSRN-- European and Islamic Law:

• Rafael Palomino, Manual Breve de Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado (Spanish Law and Religion in a Nutshell), (January 9, 2013).
• Casey Jo Cooper, From the Watch Tower to the Acropolis: The Search for a Consistent Religious Freedom Standard in an Inconsistent World, (Emory International Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2014, Forthcoming).
• Monica Lugato, National Policy Towards Religious Associations within the Framework of European Law, (Il Diritto dell'Unione Europea, 3/2013, Forthcoming).
• Tobias Lock, An Additional Protective Layer: The Case of Religious Discrimination in the United Kingdom and Germany, (Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2013/32 (2013)).
• Hamid Harasani, The Role of Ijtihād in Progressing Islamic Law in Modern Times, (10 US-China Law Review 361).

From SmartCILP:

• Robert A. Destro,"You Have the Right to Remain Silent": Does the U.S. Constitution Require Public Affirmation of Same-Sex Marriage?, 27 BYU Journal of Public Law 397-440 (2013).
• Pascale Fournier & Pascal McDougall, False Jurisdictions? A Revisionist Take On Customary (Religious) Law in Germany, 48 Texas International Law Journal 435-463 (2013).

Labor Department Recognizes Same-Sex Marriages Under ERISA

On Wednesday, the U.S. Department of Labor issued Technical Release No. 2013-04  providing guidance on applying the Supreme Court's Windsor decision to regulations under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code relating to employee benefit plans. (News release.) The Technical Release provides in part:

the term "spouse" will be read to refer to any individuals who are lawfully married under any state law, including individuals married to a person of the same sex who were legally married in a state that recognizes such marriages, but who are domiciled in a state that does not recognize such marriages. Similarly, the term "marriage" will be read to include a same-sex marriage that is legally recognized as a marriage under any state law....

The terms "spouse" and "marriage," however, do not include individuals in a formal relationship recognized by a state that is not denominated a marriage under state law, such as a domestic partnership or a civil union, regardless of whether the individuals who are in these relationships have the same rights and responsibilities as those individuals who are married under state law. The foregoing sentence applies to individuals who are in these relationships with an individual of the opposite sex or same sex.

[Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Court Orders Pennsylvania County Clerk To Stop Issuing Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Health v. Hanes, (Comnw. Ct., Sept. 12, 2013) a Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court judge granted a writ of mandamus ordering Montgomery County court clerk D. Bruce Hanes to comply with all the provisions of Pennsylvania's Marriage Law.  The order stops Hanes from issuing marriage licenses to and accepting marriage certificates from same-sex couples. Hanes began to issue licenses to same-sex couples in July after the U.S. Supreme Court's Windsor decision. (See prior posting.) In ordering Hanes to comply with the state's ban on same-sex marriage, the court said:

Because only the General Assembly may suspend its own statutes and because only courts have the authority to determine the constitutionality of a statute, and because all statutes are presumptively constitutional, a public official “[i]s without power or authority, even though he is of the opinion that a statute is unconstitutional, to implement his opinion in such a manner as to effectively abrogate or suspend such statute which is presumptively constitutional until declared otherwise by the Judiciary.”... Based on the foregoing, it is clear that Hanes does not have standing to assert the purported unconstitutionality of the Marriage Law as a defense to the instant Petition.

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports on the decision.

Group Urges SEC To Expand Accredited Investor Rule To Cover Same-Sex Couples

The U.S. Supreme Court's Windsor decision striking down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is rippling through unexpected corners of federal regulation.  A group of investors and entrepreneurs calling themselves StartupEquality.org last week sent a letter (full text) to the Securities and Exchange Commission urging the expansion of SEC's Regulation D that allows businesses to raise capital from wealthy investors in private placements without filing a full registration statement. SEC Rule 501 defines "accredited investors"-- those who may purchase in private placements-- as including spouses who jointly meet certain income or net worth levels.  The group's letter says that the Windsor decision should be read to automatically extend Rule 501 to same-sex married couples, and urges the SEC to expand the rule so that same-sex couples in civil unions, domestic partnership arrangements and the like who are unable to marry may also aggregate their income and assets to determine accredited investor status.

Southern Baptist Convention Bars Its Military Chaplains From Participating In Same-Sex Weddings

The North American Mission Board on Aug. 29 released new Guidelines (full text) clarifying the expectations for all military and VA chaplains endorsed by the Southern Baptist Convention in light of the Supreme Court's invalidation of the Defense of Marriage Act. The new Guidelines provide in part:

All ministries regarding human sexuality will reflect the historic, natural and biblical view of marriage as God's lifelong gift of "the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime."...

Southern Baptists believe that "all forms of  sexual immorality, including adultery, homosexuality and pornography" ... are condemned by Holy Scripture as sin.... Responsible pastoral care will seek to offer repentance and forgiveness, help and healing, and restoration through the mercy and grace of Jesus Christ;s sacrificial gift of love on the cross.

NAMB-endorsed chaplains will not conduct or attend a wedding ceremony for any same-sex couple, bless such a union or perform counseling in support of such a union, assist or support paid contractors or volunteers leading same-sex relational events, nor offer any kind of relationship training or retreat, on or off of a military installation, that would give the appearance of accepting the homosexual lifestyle or sexual wrongdoing. This biblical prohibition remains in effect irrespective of any civil law authorizing same-sex marriage or benefits to the contrary....

[NAMB-endorsed chaplains may not conduct] a service jointly with a chaplain, contractor or volunteer who personally practices a homosexual lifestyle or affirms a homosexual lifestyle or such conduct.

AP reports on the new Guidelines.

Texas AG Says City's Ban On Officials Demonstrating Bias By Word or Deed is Unconstitutional

On Thursday, the San Antonio, Texas city council adopted, by a vote of 8-3 an ordinance (full text) expanding its non-discrimination bans to include discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity and veteran status. It provides, however, that nothing in the ordinance "shall be construed as requiring any person or organization to support or advocate any particular lifestyle or religious view, or advance any particular message or idea." One of the most controversial portions of the new law is the provision that:

No appointed official or member of a board or commission shall engage in discrimination or demonstrate a bias, by word or deed, against any person, group of persons, or organization on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, veteran status, age or disability, while acting in their official capacity while in such public position.

The Texas Tribune reported Friday that state attorney general Greg Abbott takes the position that this ban violates the free speech and free exercise provisions of the Texas and U.S. constitutions and opens the city to possible lawsuits. He says that the provision could expose officials to removal from office for speaking in favor of Texas' constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

Suit Challenges South Carolina's Refusal To Recognize Same-Sex Marriages

Last week, a suit was filed in a South Carolina federal district court challenging the state's refusal to allow same-sex marriages and its refusal to recognize same-sex marriages legally performed in other states.  The complaint (full text) in Bradacs v. Haley, (D SC, filed 8/28/2013), contends that South Carolina's statutory law (SC Code 20-1-15) and its constitutional provision barring recognition of plaintiffs' marriage (Art. XVII, Sec. 15) violate the due process, equal protection and full faith and credit clauses of the Constitution.  The State reports on the lawsuit that was filed by Highway Patrol Trooper Katherine Bradacs and her spouse, Tracie Goodwin, who were married in the District of Columbia last year.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Daniel Tagliarina, Power, Privilege, and Rights: How the Powerful and Powerless Create a Vernacular of Rights, (APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper).
• Daniel O. Conkle, Evolving Values, Animus, and Same-Sex Marriage, (Indiana Law Journal, Volume 89 (January 2014, Forthcoming)).
• James G. Dwyer, The Parental Choice Fallacy in Education Reform Debates, (Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 5, 2012).
• Dan E. Stigall, The Civil Codes of Libya and Syria: Hybridity, Durability, and Post-Revolution Viability in the Aftermath of the Arab Spring, (Emory International Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2014).
• Carolyn M. Evans & Anna Hood, Religious Autonomy and Labour Law: A Comparison of Jurisprudence of the United States and the European Court of Human Rights, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2012).
• Michael J. Perry, Interrogational Torture as a Human Rights Issue: A Brief Further Reflection on the Morality of Human Rights, (August 29, 2013).
• Zvi H. Triger, The Self-Defeating Nature of 'Modesty'-Based Gender Segregation, (Israel Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 19-28 (2013)).

From SmartCILP:

• Jennifer L. Bursch & Cassie Cox (student), Qualified Immunity and the Application of Pearson: C.F. ex rel. Farnan v. Capistrano Unified School District, 5 Regent Journal of Law & Public Policy 85-109 (2013).
• James A. Davids, The Establishment Clause and Public Funding of Religious Colleges, 5 Regent Journal of Law & Public Policy 11-83 (2013).
• Patrick T. Gillen, A Winn for Originalism Puts Establishment Clause Reform Within Reach, 21 William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 1107-1151 (2013).

Ginsburg Becomes First SCOTUS Justice To Officiate At Same-Sex Wedding

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg yesterday became the first U.S. Supreme Court Justice to officiate at a same-sex wedding ceremony.  NBC reports that Ginsburg officiated at the marriage of John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts President Michael M. Kaiser, to economist John Roberts. Kaiser is a long-time friend of Ginsburg.  The wedding took place in the atrium of the Kennedy Center.

IRS Rules That Legal Same-Sex Marriages Will Be Recognized For Tax Purposes, Regardless Of Couple's Current Domicile

The Internal Revenue Service announced yesterday that legally-married same-sex couples will be treated as married for federal tax purposes, even if they live in a state that refuses to recognize their legal marriage that was performed elsewhere. The new policy is formally reflected in Revenue Ruling 2013-17 which defends the gender-neutral reading of gender-specific terms in the Internal Revenue Code that the new policy requires. However, the ruling does not extend to domestic partnerships, civil unions, or other similar formal relationships recognized, but not called marriage, under state law. The IRS also issued updated Frequently Asked Questions for same-sex couples and updated FAQs for registered domestic partners and individuals in civil unions.

Two New Mexico Counties Begin Issuing Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

In New Mexico this week, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican, two county clerks began issuing licenses for same-sex marriages. On  Aug. 21, Doña Ana County Clerk Lynn Ellins began issuing the licenses, saying that there is nothing in state law to prohibit it.  The state attorney general said he would not intervene. Then on Aug. 22, a state trial court judge in Hanna v. Salazar issued a writ of mandamus ordering Santa Fe County Clerk Geraldine Salazar to issue a marriage licence to a same-sex couple who sued after their license application was denied. The county clerk responded enthusiastically, saying:

Now that Judge Singleton has ordered me to issue a license to Messrs. Hanna and Hudson on constitutional grounds, I intend to do so and to issue a license to any same-sex couple who desires one and are otherwise qualified. By complying with the judge’s order we will be issuing licenses legally and will not continue to use limited county resources on further litigation.

At least 45 same-sex couples were issued licenses yesterday.