Catholic Bishops Considering How To Treat Dissenting Politicians

According to the Associated Press, a Roman Catholic bishops' special task force on Catholic politicians who disagree with the Church on issues like abortion, euthanasia and same-sex marriage will confer with Democratic and Republican lawmakers in Washington this week. During the 2004 Presidential campaign, the issue of whether dissenting Catholic candidates should be barred from receiving Holy Communion became an important issue. Last year the U.S. bishops agreed that officeholders who support abortion rights or euthanasia are "cooperating in evil", but only individual bishops would decide whether they should receive communion. The new task force may have revised guidelines ready for the U.S. bishops' next meeting in June, in advance of the upcoming congressional campaign. Washington's Cardinal Theodore McCarrick who chairs the task force said the bishops were discussing with college presidents the possibility of denying awards and speech invitations to such candidates. Some bishops want a ban on all appearances while others would only ban speeches on topics where there is disagreement with church teaching.

Alberta to Protect Officials With Religious Objections to Performing Gay Marriage

Now that Canada has recognized same-sex marriages, individual provinces are concerned about protecting marriage commissioners who have religious scruples against performing such ceremonies. (See earlier posting.) Alberta Justice Minister Ron Stevens has promised to introduce legislation to shield commissioners from human rights complaints in such cases, even if it means invoking the "notwithstanding clause" of Sec. 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that permits laws to override the Charter, subject to re-enactment every 5 years. Today's Globe and Mail reports on these developments and says that the Canadian federal government is unlikely to oppose such a law. In Alberta, use of the "notwithstanding clause" requires a province-wide referendum. A marriage minister in Manitoba has already been sued by a gay couple after he refused to perform a wedding ceremony for them.

Canada Enacts Law Permitting Gay Marriage, Protecting Religious Objections

Canada on Wednesday became the fourth country to officially recognize gay marriage as the Senate passed Bill C-38 (Washington Blade ) and the act received royal assent (RedNova News).

The new statute contains two provisions specifically protecting the religious freedom of those who object to gay unions: "officials of religious groups are free to refuse to perform marriages that are not in accordance with their religious beliefs" and "no person or organization shall be deprived of any benefit, or be subject to any obligation or sanction, under any law of the Parliament of Canada solely by reason of their exercise, in respect of marriage between persons of the same sex, of the freedom of conscience and religion guaranteed under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the expression of their beliefs in respect of marriage as the union of a man and woman to the exclusion of all others based on that guaranteed freedom."

The full text and legislative history of the Act is available online.

Canadian Lawyers Claim Pending Gay Marriage Bill Threatens Clergy

In Canada, in February the government proposed a bill to legalize same-sex marriage (Bill C-38). Today LifeSite News reports on a letter to members of Parliament from a group of lawyers claiming that enactment will lead to litigation against religious officials and groups that refuse to solemnize same-sex marriages. Even though the proposed bill provides that "officials of religious groups are free to refuse to perform marriages that are not in accordance with their religious beliefs", the lawyers claim that "the Parliament of Canada cannot protect religious groups or officials from [lawsuits] because the solemnization of marriage lies within the exclusive competence of the provinces."