This week saw developments in two ongoing controversies involving the government of India's relationship with disparate religious groups.
IANS reports that on Monday, the Delhi High Court notified the government of a suit that has been filed challenging government subsidies given exclusively to Haj pilgrims. The suit asks that other religions get similar treatment. It seeks grants for Hindus for their pilgrimage to Amarnath and Mansarovar, for Sikhs for their pilgrimage to Nankana Saheb, for Buddhists to offer prayers at Sarnath, for Christians for their journey to Rome, and for Jains to visit their shrines. The suit argues that Articles 14, 15 and 17 of the Indian Constitution prohibits the government giving benefits to one particular religion. A challenge to Haj subsidies was filed in the Allahabad High Court in Uttar Pradesh earlier this year. (See prior posting.)
Meanwhile The Hindu reports that on Monday, in an unruly session of Uttar Pradesh's Assembly, the government introduced a resolution demanding an amendment to the country's Constitutional (Scheduled Caste) Order, 1950 to include Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians, along with Dalit Hindus, in the "Scheduled Caste" category entitled to special benefits. This would involve deleting Section 3 of the Order. Proponents claim that denial of benefits to Dalit Muslims and Christians violates Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution.
