Last March, Cardinal William Joseph Levada, head of the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued a directive to the Archdiocese of San Francisco's social service agencies, instructing them to stop placing children in need of adoption with homosexual households. This led San Francisco's Board of Supervisors to pass a resolution calling for the Cardinal to withdraw his directive. The resolution said that it is "an insult to all San Franciscans when a foreign country, like the Vatican, meddles with and attempts to negatively influence this great City's existing and established customs and traditions such as the right of same-sex couples to adopt and care for children in need." Upset with that resolution, a Catholic civil rights group sued San Francisco, claiming that the resolution violates the Establishment Clause. The suit asked the court to enjoin the Board of Supervisors from criticizing and attacking religion and religious beliefs. (See prior postings 1, 2.)
On Thursday, in Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights v. City and County of San Francisco, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86698 (ND CA, Nov. 30, 2006), relying in particular on a 2002 Ninth Circuit decision, a California federal district court dismissed the claim against the Board of Supervisors, finding that the Supervisors' Resolution has a secular purpose and effect. It also rejected the claim that the resolution constitutes excessive entanglement, saying that "it is merely the exercise of free speech rights by duly elected office holders."
