Abuse Victim Loses Case on Limitations, Scope of Employment Determinations

In Schmidt v. Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, (OR Ct. App., March 19, 2008), an Oregon state appellate court in a 2-1 decision held that one Catholic priest's conduct did not amount to "child abuse" so that an extended statute of limitations did not apply. The priest was accused of masturbating one time in the presence of plaintiff who was then a high school freshman. The court also, this time unanimously, decided that another (now deceased) priest's conduct was not in the scope of his employment so that his abbey and archdiocese are not vicariously liable for his actions. The priest encountered plaintiff (then 7 or 8 years old) after he fell while roller skating on the sidewalk. He helped plaintiff up, took him to the basement of the nearby church, and ultimately assaulted him sexually. While the priest was fulfilling a pastor's role in initially helping plaintiff, the court said there was no evidence that this was part of the priest's particular employment duties in the parish. Today's Oregonian reports on the decision.