Split Ohio Supreme Court Upholds Firing Of Science Teacher For Refusing To Remove Religious Materials

In a 4-3 decision today, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the firing of middle school science teacher John Freshwater for insubordination in failing to comply with orders to remove religious materials from his classroom.  In Freshwater v. Mount Vernon City School District Board of Education, (OH Sup. Ct., Nov. 19, 2013), Chief Justice O'Connor in an opinion joined by Justices French and O'Neill held that the school improperly ordered Freshwater to remove his personal Bible from his desk. The order infringed Freshwater's free exercise rights; the Bible posed no threat of an Establishment Clause violation because Freshwater did not use it while teaching.  However, Freshwater was properly removed for insubordination in failing to comply with orders to remove other religious materials from his classroom.  The Chief Justice added:

Accordingly, based on our  resolution of this threshold issue, we need not reach the constitutional issue of  whether Freshwater impermissibly imposed his religious beliefs in his classroom.

Justice Lanzinger wrote a separate opinion joining only the court's syllabus in the case, saying:

I would hold that the school district’s order that John Freshwater put away his personal Bible while students were present was a reasonable and valid attempt to avoid an Establishment Clause violation. That order did not infringe on Freshwater’s free speech rights, for he was not required to remove the Bible from the classroom—merely putting the book into a desk drawer during class time would have sufficed.

Justice Pfeifer, in a rather blistering dissent, argued that the core of the insubordination charges against Freshwater involved his refusal to remove his personal Bible. Pfeifer agreed with the lead opinion that the order to remove it was improper but disagreed on the handling of the remaining insubordination charges:

With the insubordination claim gutted, the lead opinion should have moved on to consider the constitutional issues remaining in the case. Instead, the majority walks away from the opportunity to provide helpful guidance....

Thus concludes the sorry saga of John Freshwater, excellent junior-high science teacher, terminated as a result of an extreme overreaction of the parents of a decent student, followed by even less informed and measured responses by Mount Vernon school administrators and the school board.... [T]hey have managed to divide a really nice community and cost the school board and/or its insurance providers well over a million dollars to free itself of a very good teacher. And the people they did it for left town. 

There is a clear set of winners today: the lawyers.... They have told themselves that they are participating in the evolved version of the Scopes trial, when in reality they have created a modern Jarndyce and Jarndyce.... 

This court accepted jurisdiction in this case presumably to speak to the important issues of the Establishment Clause, academic freedom, and how schools may approach educating children about the scientific theories of evolution, which may directly clash with religious teachings of creation to which many children have been exposed at home and at church. Instead this court ... [leaves] the resolution of all these heady matters in the hands of a lone referee. Ironically, the lead opinion in this case proves the existence of God. Apparently, he’s an R.C. 3319.16 referee from Shelby.

Justice O'Donnell also filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Pfeiffer and Kennedy. He argued that there was insufficient evidence to support the insubordination claim, and that Freshwater was improperly charged with injecting his personal religious beliefs into his teaching:

[T]he evidence in this case reveals that the school board has misinterpreted Freshwater’s effort to challenge students to think critically about evolutionary theory and instead construed his instruction as promoting intelligent design from a creationist perspective. This is a misimpression and contrary to the evidence in this case, and it is not a basis to terminate the contract of a teacher. 

The school board ... apparently assumed that he could not fairly present lessons on evolution and stated that he “not only injected his subjective, biased, Christian religion based, non-scientific opinion into the instruction of eighth grade science students but also gave those students reason to doubt the accuracy and or veracity of scientists, science textbooks, and/or science in general.” Yet student scores on standardized tests stand as strong, persuasive evidence of the board’s faulty conclusion; those scores instead reveal that Freshwater did teach evolution as mandated by the curriculum. Moreover, teaching students to question and rethink accepted scientific theories is essential to their understanding of the scientific method, the key concept his science students learned in eighth grade.

The Supreme Court also issued a lengthy press release on the decision, and the Columbus Dispatch reports on the decision.