During the trial, though, it became clear that no law had been broken. In the past, legislation has been introduced into Israel's Knesset to set standards for who may perform ritual circumcisions. Proposals have not passed because technically Jewish law imposes the obligation on the father to circumcise his son. Usually fathers delegate the task to a professional mohel. But if a father who did not meet legislative criteria chose to perform the circumcision himself, the law would be imposing criminal penalties on the performance of a religious obligation. This could create freedom of religion concerns. Magistrate Judge Haim Nachmias however in dismissing the charges wrote:
The legislators would be wise to regulate the profession of performing circumcisions, and the supervision of those performing this religious commandment, through legislation. And it would be better had this been done already.