By declining to rehear this case en banc, our court embraces the narrowest construction of the First Amendment’s “ministerial exception” and splits from the consensus of our sister circuits that the employee’s ministerial function should be the key focus.[Thanks to Jeff Pasek for the lead.]
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Wednesday, June 26, 2019
9th Circuit, Over Dissents, Denies En Banc Rehearing In Ministerial Exception Case
In Biel v. St. James School, (9th Cir., June 25, 2019), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied a rehearing en banc in an ADA case brought by a 5th grade teacher at a Catholic elementary school. The panel, in a 2-1 decision, held that the teacher is not a "minister" for purposes of the ministerial exception doctrine. (See prior posting.) Nine judges dissented from the denial of an en banc rehearing in a 24-page opinion written by Judge Nelson, saying in part: