Defendants have provided satisfactory evidence to show that the state has a compelling interest in enacting a law banning cockfighting and because the evidence casts doubt upon the type of institution operated by Plaintiffs. In other words, the evidence suggests that the cockfighting activities were more commercial in nature than a bona fide religious ritual.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Tuesday, July 14, 2020
Court Rejects Church's Claim That Its Free Exercise Rights Include Cockfighting
In Plumbar v. Perrilloux, (MD LA, July 13, 2020), a Louisiana federal district court refused to issue a preliminary injunction against enforcement of Louisiana's statute that bans cockfighting. Members of Holy Fight Ministries claim that cockfighting is an integral and essential part of their religious faith. In denying the injunction, the court said in part:
Labels:
Cockfighting,
Free exercise,
Louisiana