We reject wife’s argument that the court’s grant of a no-fault divorce contrary to India’s Hindu Marriage Act, and the religious requirements reflected therein, impinges on wife’s free exercise of religion in violation of Chapter I, Article 3 of the Vermont Constitution. Quite the opposite, it would be constitutionally problematic, to say the least, if we began to decline access to a divorce from an otherwise qualified domiciliary on the basis of the religious convictions of the other party.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Showing posts with label Inda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inda. Show all posts
Thursday, January 18, 2018
Wife's Religious Convictions Do Not Override Vermont Divorce Law
In Maghu v. Singh, (VT Sup. Ct., Jan. 12, 2018), the Vermont Supreme Court rejected a wife's attempt to obtain dismissal of a no-fault divorce petition filed by her husband. The couple was married in India and, among other contentions, the wife argued that Vermont's courts should defer to Indian divorce law. In rejecting that contention, the court said in a footnote:
Friday, March 18, 2016
Indian Court Says Sikh Witness Cannot Be Barred From Wearing Kirpan
In Singh v. State of Haryana, (High Ct. Punjab and Haryana, March 16, 2016), a trial court in the Indian state of Punjab held that Art. 25 of India's Constitution which protects freedom of conscience and religion invalidates a court's order barring a Sikh witness from wearing a kirpan while testfying. The opinion contains lengthy discussion of the kirpan and of the freedom of religion provision in India's constitution. LiveLaw reports on the decision.
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Indian Court Bars Jain Practice of Santhara As Suicide
In India, the Rajasthan High Court, acting on a public interest petition, held that Santhara, a traditional Jain practice of starving oneself to death to attain salvation (background), is suicide under the Indian Penal Code. Thus Sec. 306 outlawing abeting of suicide and Section 309 outlawing attempted suicide apply. The court said in part:
The respondents failed to establish that Santhara is an essential religious practice without which the following of Jain religion is not permissible.According to the Calcutta Telegraph, the activist who filed the suit says: "... Santhara is a way devised by the family to get rid of the economic burden of caring for its elderly." Jain organizations say they will appeal the decision.
Tuesday, June 09, 2015
Muslim Leaders In India Object To Required Yoga Sun Salutation In Schools
The Wall Street Journal reports today that Muslim leaders in India are complaining that schools in the states of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh are requiring students to learn yoga, including "surya namaskar"-- the sun salutation. Students are also required to chant "Om" or other Sanskrit verses that the All India Muslim Personal Law Board says are connected to the Hindu religion. Islamic law prohibits Muslims from bending before anyone other than Allah or God. The controversy comes as India prepares to celebrate the world's first International Day of Yoga next week. The All India Imam Organization says that yoga connected to health rather than religion is fine so long as the sun salutation is not required.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)