President's Thanksgiving Proclamation and Its References To Religion

Last week President Bush issued a Presidential Proclamation (full text) setting today as Thanksgiving. Stressing religious origins of the day, the President said "Nearly four centuries have passed since early settlers gave thanks for their safe arrival and pilgrims enjoyed a harvest feast to thank God for allowing them to survive a harsh winter in the New World." He continued: "I encourage all Americans to gather together in their homes and places of worship with family, friends, and loved ones to reinforce the ties that bind us and give thanks for the freedoms and many blessings we enjoy."

Yesterday, the President focused more on the secular aspects of the holiday, pardoning two Thanksgiving turkeys brought to the White House by the National Turkey Federation. Today the turkeys will serve as the honorary grand marshall of the Thanksgiving Day Parade at Disneyland. However, President Bush did not totally ignore the religious element of the day, pointing out-- just before granting the formal pardon-- that "on Thanksgiving Day, we gather with loved ones and we lift our hearts toward heaven in humility and gratitude." (Full text of President's statement.) The White House website has a special web page devoted to Thanksgiving 2006, including the results of the online voting for the preferred names for the White House turkeys. The winning choice was Flyer and Fryer.

Joseph Knippenberg at No Left Turns discusses the history of Presidential Thanksgiving Proclamations, and the varying emphasis on religion in them. And in today's Washington Post, columnist Jon Meacham discusses how to fit Thanksgiving into America's church-state separation.

47 Congress Members Support "In God We Trust" As 9th Circuit Amici

The American Center for Law and Justice announced yesterday that it has filed a brief on behalf of 47 member of Congress (1 Senator and 46 Representatives) in the 9th Circuit case of Newdow v. Congress of the United States. The case involves a challenge to the constitutionality of the national motto, "In God We Trust". The amicus brief (full text) argues that the use of the national motto is fully consistent with the Establishment Clause. Relying on Supreme Court dicta and lower court decisions, the brief says that the motto merely reflects the historical role of religion in U.S. history. (See prior related posting.)

Virginia Protects Game From Being Hunted On Sundays

As deer hunting season begins, The Hook reported yesterday that one of the remaining "blue laws" in Virginia bans hunting on Sunday. Code of Virginia Sec. 29.1-521 provides, rather cryptically, that it is unlawful: "To hunt or kill any wild bird or wild animal, including any nuisance species, with a gun, firearm or other weapon on Sunday, which is hereby declared a rest day for all species of wild bird and wild animal life, except raccoons, which may be hunted until 2:00 a.m. on Sunday mornings." Virginia residents are split on whether the ban on Sunday hunting should be repealed. Apparently the state Game Department favors repeal to counter a decline in the sale of hunting licenses.

6th Circuit Upholds Retaliation Claim By School Official Invited To Gay Church

Yesterday in Scarbrough v. Morgan County Board of Education, (6th Cir., Nov. 22, 2006), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's grant of summary judgment and permitted a school superintendent who was not appointed to a new position as director of county schools to proceed with his First Amendment retaliation claims against three members of a School Board of Education who voted against him. The court also permitted him to proceed under 42 USC Sec. 1983 against the Morgan County, Tennessee School Board itself. Plaintiff Paul Scarbrough argued that he was denied the position because a local newspaper had reported that he had agreed to speak at a convention sponsored by a church with a predominantly gay and lesbian congregation. In fact, he ultimately turned down the invitation to speak because of scheduling conflicts. The court held that the retaliation claims arise under the First Amendment's free speech clause, and dismissed a parallel free exercise of religion claim, as well as a freedom of association claim, saying that these are not independent causes of action.

Free Exercise Challenge To County Human Rights Code Dismissed As Moot

Arlington County Virginia's Human Rights Code (Code Chap. 31) prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Last year, Bono Film & Video, Inc. refused a request by Lilli Vincenz that it copy for her two videos about gays and lesbians. The family-owned company has a policy that it will refuse work that is inconsistent with its Christian and ethical values. Vincenz filed a complaint with the Arlington County Human Rights Commission. Initially it issued a decision finding that Bono Film and its owner had illegally discriminated against Vincenz. After Vincenz filed suit, the Commission reconsidered the decision and dismissed the case. Last week in Bono Film & Video, Inc. v. Arlington County Human Rights Commission, 2006 Va. Cir. LEXIS 194 (Cir. Ct. Arl. Co., Nov. 16, 2006), a Virginia trial court dismissed the suit that had been filed challenging the Commission's action. The court held that since no enforcement action had been taken against plaintiffs, they lacked standing to pursue the claim that Virginia law did not authorized the Commission to investigate sexual orientation discrimination claims. Their free exercise claims challenging the Commission's initial decision were found to now be moot. (See prior related posting.)

India's Supreme Court Will Consider Whether Superstition About 13 Is Religious

India's Supreme Court has agreed to review an unusual case in which a man from Kerala charges that superstitious avoidance of the number 13 by the government violates the India's secular constitution and is based on Christian ideas. His suit challenges the High Court of Kerala's decision not to have a Court number 13. Yesterday Reuters reported that the lower court held N.K. Chandramohan's suit was "frivolous" and fined him 10,000 rupees for trying to "malign" the court. But the Supreme Court on Monday said that "such superstitious behavior cannot be encouraged", and said it would hear the appeal soon.

Imams Removed From US Airways Flight For Suspicious Behavior

Six imams charge that they were unjustifiably removed yesterday from a US Airways flight that they had just boarded in Minneapolis. They were handcuffed and questioned by police and FBI agents before eventually being cleared. The Arizona Republic reports that the imams prayed in the airport waiting area before boarding the plane. On the plane, two of the imams asked for seat belt extensions, and one of them offered to give up his first class seat to another of the imams who was blind. All of this led a passenger to pass a note to a flight attendant saying the imams were acting suspiciously. Eventually the pilot, after conferring with ground personnel, decided that the imams should be removed from the flight. The Islamic civil rights group, CAIR, called for an investigation of the incident, and US Airways said it is looking into what happened.

Church of Norway Supports End of Official State Religion

The General Synod of the state Church of Norway has voted to support separation of church and state in Norway. Following on government hearings earlier this year (see prior posting), the synod voted 63-19 to end the 469-year tradition that made Lutheranism the official religion of the country. Today's International Herald Tribune reports that any change would require an amendment to Norway's constitution, and that requires action by two successive Parliaments.

European Rabbis To Set Up Divorce Enforcement Mechanism

The Rabbinical Centre of Europe based in Brussels is planning to set up a new mechanism to deal with husbands who flee to other countries in order to avoid orders of rabbinic courts in divorce cases. Under Jewish religious law, a woman may not remarry if her husband has not granted her a religious divorce ("get"). Many rabbinic judges are facing cases in which a husband who is ordered by the rabbinic court to grant his wife a divorce is instead moving to a distant Jewish community where his past is unknown. The European Jewish Press yesterday reported that now there are plans to set up a "Jewish Interpol" that will collect information from rabbinic courts throughout Europe and disseminate that information to leaders and rabbis in all Jewish communities. This will allow the Jewish community to which the person flees to pressure the husband to comply with the religious court decree. The proposal is expected to be adopted at a December conference of Jewish religious judges to be held in Brussels. The European Parliament has invited the judicial conference to hold some of its sessions in Parliament's judicial hall.

Homeland Security Poster Informs Screeners About Kirpans

On Monday, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in cooperation with the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund (SALDEF), distributed a poster to 8,700 government facilities to inform security personnel and airport screeners about the Kirpan, a dagger worn by practicing Sikhs that represents the principle of upholding justice. Reports by DNA India and by the Washington Post yesterday indicate that while Sikhs cannot take their Kirpans into government buildings or onto flights, the poster hopefully will lead to Sikhs being treated more respectfully by security personnel in looking for a Kirpan and in any confiscation of the item.

D.C. Circuit Hears Conscientious Objector Case

The Army Times through an AP article reports that yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral arguments in Aguayo v. Harvey (Case No. 06-5241), a military conscientious objector case. Agustin Aguayo, an Army medic, announced his conscientious objection to war just as his unit was being deployed to Iraq. Aguayo went AWOL in order to avoid deployment. He is now being held in detention by Army authorities in Germany. His side of the story is related on his website, which links to all the legal documents in the case.

5th Circuit Grants En Banc Review Of Bible Monument Case

Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit granted en banc review in Staley v. Harris County Texas, (Nov. 17, 2006). In August, a panel in a 2-1 decision in the case upheld an Establishment Clause challenge to a monument on the grounds of the Harris County, Texas courthouse. The monument, containing a Bible, honors a prominent Houston businessman and philanthropist. (See prior posting.) [Thanks to How Appealing for information on the decision.]

Australian Group Sues In Victoria Claiming Religious Vilification

In the Australian state of Victoria, a trial began Tuesday under Victoria's Racial and Religious Tolerance Act in a suit brought by a group known as Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO) who follow a religion known as Thelema, founded by the English poet and mystic Aleister Crowley. Today The Age reports that the case, filed in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, accuses Dr Reina Michaelson and the Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program of vilifying OTO by describing it on its website as a satanic cult that sacrifices children. Dr Michaelson said the article was published on the website "without her knowledge or consent or authority".

A Fuller Picture Of Marines, Toys For Tots and the Jesus Dolls

Recently the media has extensively covered a decision earlier this month by the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve Toys For Tots Foundation to turn down the offer of 4,000 Jesus dolls. Then the group apparently changed its mind. Here is more background on both decisions.

Toys for Tots was approved by the Secretary of Defense in 1995 as an official activity of the U.S. Marine Corps and an official mission of the Marine Corps Reserve. This, of course, would seem to make it a governmental entity subject to the constraints of the First Amendment. So when a Los Angeles company offered to donate 4,000 Jesus dolls that recite Christian scriptural verses, the Marine-affiliated program turned them down. (AP, Nov. 15.) It said that as a government entity, the Marines do not profess one religion over another. If they distributed the dolls in their usual manner, they might end up giving the Jesus dolls to Muslim or Jewish children. Indeed, Michael La Roe, director of business development for one2believe, a division of the Valencia-based Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Co., said that the dolls were intended to be "three-dimensional teaching tools for kids".

Extensive media coverage followed. The Rutherford Institute sent the Marine Toys For Tots Foundation a letter of complaint, saying that "the refusal of the dolls sends a sinister message that gifts with religious themes or messages are not suitable or are considered second-class by a prominent charity that is intimately associated with the United States government. Christmas is, after all, a holiday with a religious basis, and the birth of Jesus is the basis of the celebration for the vast majority of Americans. Those who wish to express that aspect of the Christmas season through their giving should not be turned away and discriminated against because of their religious beliefs." It pointed out that the dolls are offered unwrapped, so parents can decline them if they do not want them for their children.

Last Wednesday, Toys For Tots changed its mind and said it would take the dolls. (Los Angeles Times.) A release today by the Jewish War Veterans suggests that the Marine Corps' "reversal" was in fact a more nuanced decision than has previously been reported. Apparently the Corps has arranged for religious groups to distribute the dolls to Christian children. Unlike many other groups, the JWV congratulated the Marine Corps Reserve both for its initial decision to reject the dolls, and its later finding an appropriate way for them to be distributed.

Decisions On Nativity Scenes On Public Property Begin To Be Made

Yesterday, the Tippecanoe County, Indiana commissioners turned down a request by a group calling itself "The Reason for the Season" that it be permitted to place a Nativity scene on the county courthouse lawn this Christmas. Proponents argued that commissioners had made the courthouse lawn an "open forum" in recent years by permitting exhibits by various charities, according to today's Lafayette (IN) Journal & Courier. Commissioners created a policy in 1999 that they would control what is displayed on the courthouse lawn. Prior to that, Nativity scenes had been placed there. Now however they permit only displays officially sponsored by the county. Some residents attending the county commission meeting complained that the county had given in to the ACLU.

Meanwhile, today's Racine (WI) Journal Times reports that Racine City Council has approved a request by Robert Wortock, backed by a group of churches, that volunteers be permitted to contruct a Nativity scene on the city's Monument Square. Now, however, the Freedom From Religion Foundation has written Mayor Gary Becker arguing that in hosting a Nativity scene, the city is endorsing a religion. A Christmas tree sponsored by the Downtown Racine Corp. will stand near the Nativity scene, and the city will place a sign nearby extending "warm season's greetings to one and all." This presumably will satisfy the requirement that a Nativity scene, accompanied by secular symbols of the season, can be permissible on public property. Racine City Council is working on a policy that will make decisions on displays such as this an administrative matter that need not come before the full Council.

Indonesia Will Keep Religion On Identity Cards

Indonesia's House of Representatives and government have agreed to continue to list religion on identity cards of Indonesians, despite protests from many who say that the practice leads to divisiveness in the country. Asia News.it reported yesterday that this decision was made as part of a larger parliamentary debate on a civil registry bill. Indonesia permits only one of six religions to be listed, and this has led to discrimination against followers of other faiths. The permissible religious identifications are Islam, Catholicism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and Confucianism. [Thanks to Persecution.org for the lead.]

No Settlement Reached-- Michigan RLUIPA Case Moves Toward Trial

Today's Detroit Free Press reports that Lighthouse Community Church of God and the city of Southfield, Michigan failed to reach an agreement in an all-day facilitation hearing in U.S. District Court in Detroit yesterday. The city obtained an eviction order against the church for failing to have a certificate of occupancy for the office building it is using, and a state court upheld the city's position. This led the church to file a federal law suit alleging that the city violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. It says the city merely prefers a residential development in that area. (See prior posting.) However, the city argues the RLUIPA is unconstitutional does not apply to attempts to bypass city zoning laws.

Democrats Can Reach Out To Orthodox Jews, Leaders Say

The current New York Jewish Week that appeared last Friday carries an article analyzing opportunities that members of the new Democratic-controlled U.S. Congress have to broaden their coalition by reaching out to Orthodox Jews who have in recent years supported a number of items on the conservative agenda. Orthodox leaders say that members of the Orthodox Jewish community are swing voters, and have good working relationships with Democratic members of Congress as well as Republicans.

Somali Region Will Adopt Sharia To Replace Civil Code

BBC News yesterday reported that Mohamed Adde Muse, leader of the autonomous region of Puntland in northern Somalia, has agreed to introduce Islamic law to replace the region's current Western-based civil law system. The move appears to be directed at preventing a take over of the region by the Union of Islamic Courts that controls much of southern Somalia. [Thanks to Persecution.org for the lead.]

California Coastal Commission Approves Eruv

The California Coastal Commission last week approved for a three-year period a request by the Pacific Jewish Center in Venice to build an eruv along the beach from Santa Monica to Marina del Rey. Today's Los Angeles Times reports that the symbolic boundary that eases Sabbath restrictions for observant Jews, which consists largely of fishing line strung high off the ground between lampposts and sign poles, will also include inland areas in Santa Monica and Los Angeles. Streamers will be placed on part of the eruv to prevent the endangered bird, the least tern, from flying into it. Also the synagogue must develop a method for monitoring the impact of the eruv on the terns. (See prior posting). [Thanks to How Appealing for the lead.]