Appeals Court Upholds Religious Objection To Autopsy On Executed Prisoner

In Johnson v. Levy, (TN Ct. App., Jan., 14, 2010), the Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed a decision of the state Chancery Court (see prior posting) and rejected the request of the county Medical Examiner to conduct an autopsy on executed murderer Cecil Johnson. Johnson's wife objected to the procedure, arguing that it would violate her husband's religious beliefs.

The court held that under Tennessee's law on preservation of religious freedom (TN Code Ann. Sec. 4-1-407), the Medical Examiner is required to establish by clear and convincing evidence under the specific facts of the case that performing an autopsy is essential to further a compelling governmental interest. While there is a compelling interest to conduct some kind of investigation as to every inmate who is executed in order to assure against cruel and unusual punishment, where a religious objection is raised to an autopsy, that may be part of the investigation only if the compelling interest standard is met. Religious objections might be overruled when the execution was not without incident, the prisoner did not react to the drugs as expected, and there is a need to understand why. Even then, the autopsy needs to be limited to the procedures necessary to understand what happened. UPI reported on the decision yesterday.

County Assessed Large Attorneys' Fees and Costs In RLUIPA Case

Last April, the Rocky Mountain Christian Church in Boulder County, Colorado won its challenge to the county's denial of its special use application, convincing a jury and the court that the denial violated the substantial burden and unreasonable limitations provisions of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. (See prior posting.) The church sought to expand the buildings on its campus. Yesterday's Longmont (CO) Times-Call reports that now the federal district court has ordered Boulder County to pay $1.25 million of the Church's legal fees, as well as $90,000 in costs. The county is now appealing the original decision, claiming that RLUIPA is unconstitutional. Oral argument to the 10th Circuit in that appeal is scheduled for March. All sides agree that the fees and costs do not have to be paid until after the appeal is concluded.

UPDATE: The text of the opinion awarding fees and costs is at Rocky Mt. Christian Church v. Bd. of County Comm'rs. of Boulder County, CO., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8273 (D CO, Jan. 11, 2010).

DC Court Upholds Election Board's Rejection of Initiative To Define Marriage

In Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, (DC Super. Ct., Jan. 14, 2010), the District of Columbia Superior Court agreed with the D.C. election board's rejection of an initiative petition seeking to amend the D.C. Code to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman would be recognized in D.C. Last year, D.C. City Council passed a law recognizing same-sex marriages validly performed elsewhere. (See prior posting.) The court held that Council appropriately implemented the Charter Amendment Act when it prohibited initiatives that would authorize discrimination in violation of the D.C. Human Rights Act. The proposed initiative would violate the Human Rights Act by authorizing discrimination based on sexual orientation. (See prior related posting.) Alliance Defense Fund (which filed the lawsuit on behalf of a local pastor and other voters) in a release yesterday says it will appeal the decision.

Pat Robertson's Remarks on Haiti Earthquake Draw Criticism

As both religious and secular groups scramble to provide aid for the earthquake victims in Haiti, evangelist Pat Robertson made comments on CBN's "700 Club" that are drawing criticism from White House advisor Valerie Jarrett as well as from many Christian leaders. ABC reports that Robertson harked back to a legend about Haiti's revolt against the French in 1803 to suggest that Haitians may have brought disaster on themselves. He said in part: "You know ... something happened a long time ago in Haiti. … They got together and swore a pact to the Devil. They said, 'We will serve you if you get us free from the French.' True story." Robertson also said that the destruction there "may be a blessing in disguise" because it could lead to a massive rebuilding of the country. YouTube has a video of Robertson's full remarks.

UPDATE: At Thursday's White House press briefing (full text), Press Secretary Robert Gibbs also commented on Robertson's remarks:

Q: ...What did you think of Pat Robertson's comments yesterday that the Haitians brought this on themselves by making a pact with the devil?

MR. GIBBS: It never ceases to amaze that in times of amazing human suffering somebody says something that could be so utterly stupid, but it like clockwork happens with some regularity....

9th Circuit Uphold's UC's Rejection of Certain Christian School Courses

In Association of Christian Schools International v. Stearns, (9th Cir., Jan. 12, 2010), the 9th Circuit rejected constitutional challenges to the University of California's admissions policy that refuses to accept certain high school courses offered by Christian schools to qualify students for admission to UC. Rejecting both facial and as-applied challenges, the Court said the policy does not prevent high schools from teaching whatever and however they choose. It rejected the argument that UC's refusal to recognize religion and ethics courses that are limited to one denomination's viewpoint amounts to discrimination. The court also rejected establishment clause and equal protection challenges to UC's policy. (See prior related postings 1, 2 .)

In Malaysia, More Vandalism and Revelations of Broader Bans on Word Usage By Non-Muslim Papers

In Malaysia, vandalism against Christian churches continues in response to a High Court decision allowing the Catholic newspaper, The Herald, to use the term "Allah" in ints Malay-language edition to refer to God. Canadian Press today reports that a tenth church was vandalized this morning, with red paint splashed on it. Also the offices of the law firm representing The Herald were broken into and ransacked. Papers were strewn on the floor and a laptop computer was taken.

Malaysian Insider today and the New Straits Times yesterday say that in fact the ban on use of certain words by non-Muslim publications is broader than previously reported. Guidelines issued to the Herald in 2007 also barred it from using three other words: Kaabah (Islam's holiest shrine in Mecca), Solat (prayer) and Baitullah (House of God). Each state in Malaysia has enacted its own laws allowing certain words to be used only by Islamic publications. In the state of Pahang, Section 9 of the Control and Restriction of the Propagation of Non-Islamic Religions Enactment 1989 lists 25 words that cannot be used in writing or speeches to describe a religion other than Islam, as well as ten expressions with Islamic origins that may not be used by non-Muslims (except as a quotation or reference).

Supreme Court Blocks Broadcast of California Proposition 8 Trial

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday, in a 5-4 decision, blocked the broadcast by a California federal district court of the non-jury trial challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8-- California's ban on same-sex marriage. In Hollingsworth v. Perry, (Sup. Ct., Jan. 13, 2010), the per curiam majority opinion concluded that the federal district court did not follow the proper procedures in amending its rules to permit broadcast of the trial. It did not give enough time for public comment on its proposal. The majority said:

The trial will involve various witnesses, including members of same-sex couples; academics, who apparently will discuss gender issues and gender equality, as well as family structures; and those who participated in the campaign leading to the adoption of Proposition 8. This Court has recognized that witness testimony may be chilled if broadcast.... Some of applicants' witnesses have already said that they will not testify if the trial is broadcast, and they have substantiated their concerns by citing incidents of past harassment....

The District Court attempted to change its rules at the eleventh hour to treat this case differently than other trials in the district. Not only did it ignore the federal statute that establishes the procedures by which its rules may be amended, its express purpose was to broadcast a high-profile trial that would include witness testimony about a contentious issue. If courts are to require that others follow regular procedures, courts must do so as well.

Technically the court granted a stay of the district court's order pending filing of petitions for a writ of certiorari and mandamus. The decision only related to the proposal to broadcast the trial live to a number of other courthouses around the country. It did not relate to the proposal to post recordings of the trial on YouTube at the end of each day. The 9th Circuit never approved that portion of the district court's poposal because the district court's technical staff encountered difficulties in preparing video that was suitable for online posting. Justice Breyer dissenting, joined by Justices Stevens, Ginsburg and Sotomayor said:

The majority’s action today is unusual. It grants a stay in order to consider a mandamus petition, with a view to intervening in a matter of local court administration that it would not (and should not) consider. It cites no precedent for doing so. It identifies no real harm, let alone “irreparable harm,” to justify its issuance of this stay.

The New York Times reports on the decision. (See prior related posting.)

Texas Board of Education Holds Hearings On Social Studies Curriculum

The Texas State Board of Education yesterday held hearings on proposed revisions to the state's social studies curriculum. A number of the 130 speakers at the hearing focused on issues of how the role of religion in American history will be taught. News 8 Austin and the Ft. Worth Star Telegram report on much of the testimony. Sue Tilis of the National Council of Jewish Women said the draft revisions do a good job of teaching the role of religion in history without advocating particular religious beliefs. Steve Green representing the Texas Freedom Network objected to increased emphasis on documents such as the Mayflower Compact of 1620 written by Christian Pilgrims. Other witnesses urged changes ranging from more emphasis on American "exceptionalism" to including discussion of Sikhism in the world history section of the curriculum standards.

Rhode Island Legislature Overrides Veto Of Limitations Extension for Civil Rights Claims

On Jan. 5, the Rhode Island legislature overrode Gov. Donald Carcieri's veto of SB 162 which extends from one year to three years the statute of limitations applicable to discrimination suits under the state's Civil Rights Act of 1990. That law prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, race, sex, age, national origin or disability in making or enforcing contracts, in buying, selling or leasing real property and in various other matters. A Jan. 7 article from Lexology says this means that employers who terminate or take other action against an employee may not know for three years whether the action will be challenged. Unlike the state's Fair Employment Practices Act, the law does not require filing first with the Human Rights Commission before suit is filed in court.

Wisconsin Board Rejects RLUIPA Argument In Zoning For Bible Camp

The Oneida County (Wisconsin) Board of Adjustment has rejected a RLUIPA claim and has upheld the denial of a conditional use permit for construction of a Bible camp on Squash Lake near Rhinelander (WI). Yesterday's Rhinelander Daily News reports that the zoning ordinance would allow a church or a school to be built on the site, but the Board ruled that a camp and conference center are not permitted even though the lodge would contain a chapel and classrooms. The Board concluded that denial of the permit did not impose a "substantial burden" on the free exercise of the two brothers who sought to build the recreational camp. Other sites in the county are available where the camp could be built.

Canadian FLDS Leader Sues BC Government For Illegal Prosecution

In Canada, FLDS leader Winston Blackmore has filed a claim for damages against British Columbia's provincial government charging that he was prosecuted illegally last year. As previously reported, polygamy charges against Blackmore were quashed when the B.C. Supreme Court ruled that the province's attorney general lacked authority to appoint a second special prosecutor after a first one recommended against filing the charges. Yesterday's National Post reports that Blackmore's suit, filed in the B.C. Supreme Court, claims that the polygamy charges caused him to suffer business and other financial losses and that he and his family suffered stress and anxiety.

Suit Seeks To Prevent Further Searches of Missouri Church [Corrected]

In Independence, Missouri yesterday, the New Covenant Faith Center, along with its pastor, his wife and the church secretary filed suit to prevent the Jackson County Sheriff's Office from conducting further searches of the church or having contacts with its members. The Kansas City Star reports that in a series of searches last week, authorities took $130,000, computers and files containing personal information about church members. The church cannot meet its payroll or operate as a result of the seizures. The lawsuit, which alleges that church members' free exercise rights have been infringed, also seeks damages and return of the property that was taken. The church's pastor, Lloyd D. Sartain, was detained twice but no charges have been filed. The search warrant has been sealed and no one will comment on the charges that led to the searches. According to the Kansas City Pitch last week, authorities also found four guns during the searches. The church's attorney (who regained his law license in 2006 after serving federal prison time for bribery and bank fraud) criticized Sheriff Mike Sharp's performance. The attorney says a power struggle within the church led to the investigation, and rumors it operates as a cult are inaccurate. [Note: An earlier version of this posting incorrectly identified the location of Independence as Kansas instead of Missouri.]

Bankruptcy Judge Orders Trial On Whether Parish Assets Are Shielded From Diocese Creditors

A Delaware federal bankruptcy judge yesterday decided that the Catholic Diocese of Wilmington cannot develop a plan of reorganization and exit bankruptcy without first obtaining a determination of whether funds belonging to individual parishes and Catholic Charities are shielded from Diocese creditors (mostly abuse victims). Bloomberg News reports that Judge Christopher Sontchi ordered a trial to take place in June on the issue.

White House Faith-Based Task Force Debates Religious Symbols In Funded Programs

The White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships Task Force on reform of the faith-based office held a two-hour teleconference on Monday as it moved toward finalizing its draft report. According to the Washington Post's On Faith, one of the important debates on the phone conference was whether religious groups operating federally-funded programs out of their facilities need to cover up religious symbols during the times the funded services are being offered. The task force discussed two other alternatives: allowing the symbols if covering them is impractical and no religiously neutral rooms are available, or imposing no requirements but urging religious groups to be sensitive to the issue. No consensus emerged, as the group chose Wake Forest Center for Religion and Public Affairs Director Melissa Rogers to coordinate the drafting of the final report.

Trial Court Leaves Open Manslaughter Option In Trial of Tiller's Shooter

In Wichita, Kansas, a state trial court judge has left open the question of whether Scott Roeder who is on trial for killing abortion doctor George Tiller will be permitted to argue that he is guilty only of manslaughter. Roeder wants to argue that he was attempting to save the lives of the unborn. According to yesterday's New York Times, Judge Warren Wilbert denied the prosecution motion to exclude evidence that might support a manslaughter conviction. Instead, he said that he would decide on a witness-by-witness basis during trial what evidence he will admit. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

3rd Circuit Dismisses Challenge To Muslim Scientist's Security Clearance

In El-Ganayni v. U.S. Department of Energy, (3d Cir., Jan. 11, 2010), the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the revocation of the security clearance of a Muslim physicist, Abdel El-Ganayni, who worked for Bettis Laboratory on the Navy's nuclear propulsion program. El-Ganayni also served as an imam for the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. His problems apparently began after he distributed to Muslim prisoners a book about Islam titled The Miracle in the Ant, which includes a passage about an ant that has a defense mechanism that allows spraying of deadly secretions on attackers. He also spoke at a mosque criticizing the FBI for recruiting Muslims as informants.

El-Ganayni sued claiming the revocation was motivated by speeches he gave criticizing the FBI, US foreign policy and the war in Iraq, and that he was being discriminated against based on his religion and national origin. The court dismissed the claims concluding that El-Ganayni could prove retaliation or discrimination only by showing the government's primary motivation for revoking his clearance. This however would involve the courts in deciding on the merits of a security clearance revocation-- a matter over which courts lack jurisdiction. The court also concluded that DOE followed the applicable regulations and executive orders in revoking El-Ganayni's security clearance.

Rabbi Seeks Army Waiver of Beard Policy To Become Chaplain

Yesterday's New York Jewish Week reports on the efforts of Rabbi Menachem Stern to obtain a waiver of U.S. Army grooming rules so he can become a chaplain. Stern , a Chabad Lubavitch rabbi, wears a beard for religious reasons. Originally he was informed that the Accession Board had approved him, but then he received a phone call saying that the approval was an error because he could not enlist while wearing a beard. Apparently the chaplaincy branch is willing to have Stern wear a beard, but the Army's chief of personnel along with the chief of staff object. Rabbi Sandy Dresin, executive director of chaplains at the Aleph Institute, says that currently there is a shortage of Jewish chaplains in the military. He says that the 8 Jewish chaplains in the Army could be doubled if the Army relented on its policy on beards. [Thanks to Joel Katz (Relig. & State In Israel) for the lead.]

New Statement of Current Law On Religious Expression In U.S

Yesterday, Wake Forest University's Center for Religion and Public Affairs released a 32-page document titled Religious Expression in American Life: A Joint Statement of Current Law. Drafted by a group of 28 experts from a variety of religious and political views, the document attempts to answer in clear language some 35 questions about the permissible role of religion in the public forum. The document covers topics such as the role of religious belief in formulating public policy, restrictions on tax-exempt organizations, religious displays on public property, religion in the workplace, and religious activity in public schools. ADL has issued a press release describing the joint statement. [Thanks to Steve Sheinberg for the lead.]

British Faith Schools Criticize Government's Admissions Guidelines

Yesterday's London Mail reports that government-supported faith schools in Britain are criticizing admissions guidelines promulgated by the Department of Children, Schools and Families. Designed to prevent discrimination against working-class students, the guidelines allow schools to favor pupils who are members of the faith promoted by the school, but not to discriminate on the basis of their level of observance. Schools say this favors "pew-jumpers" who discover a new religion in order to get their children into a good school.

Pope Addresses Environment, Religion and State In Annual New Year Address

Pope Benedict XVI yesterday delivered his annual New Year address to the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See. Zenit reports on the address (full text) which focused on the environment, but related the issue to a broad range of international issues. Speaking of relations between religion and state, the Pope said:

Sadly, in certain countries, mainly in the West, one increasingly encounters in political and cultural circles, as well in the media, scarce respect and at times hostility, if not scorn, directed towards religion and towards Christianity in particular. It is clear that if relativism is considered an essential element of democracy, one risks viewing secularity solely in the sense of excluding or, more precisely, denying the social importance of religion. But such an approach creates confrontation and division, disturbs peace, harms human ecology and, by rejecting in principle approaches other than its own, finishes in a dead end.

There is thus an urgent need to delineate a positive and open secularity which, grounded in the just autonomy of the temporal order and the spiritual order, can foster healthy cooperation and a spirit of shared responsibility. Here I think of Europe, which, now that the Lisbon Treaty has taken effect, has entered a new phase in its process of integration.... Noting ... the Treaty provides for the European Union to maintain an "open, transparent and regular" dialogue with the Churches (Art. 17), I express my hope that in building its future, Europe will always draw upon the wellsprings of its Christian identity.

German State Checks IDs of All Attending Mosques

A 2003 law in the German state of Lower Saxony allows police to question and search individuals in public places regardless of suspicion of wrongdoing when done to prevent crimes of "grave and international concern." Yesterday's Boston (MA) Global Post reports that police are using this authority to routinely monitor those attending mosques. Streets in front of mosques are cordoned off on Fridays. Armed police check the identification papers of everyone entering or leaving the mosque. Sometimes police search bags, ask questions, or even bring in for questioning those who cannot show ID. The Green Party is introducing a bill to end this practice of "unmotivated mosque checks" which interferes with integration of Muslims into society.

Nevada Court Rejects Proposed Personhood Amendment

Yesterday, in a decision apparently issued orally from the bench, a Nevada trial court judge ruled that a petition seeking to place a proposed "Personhood Amendment" to the state Constitution on the November ballot cannot be circulated. The proposed amendment reads: "In the great state of Nevada,the term 'person' applies to every human being."

In Bristol v. Personhood Nevada, the court held that the language of the amendment is so vague that there is no way the average person can understand the effect of the petition. The court also concluded that the petition violates a state law that limits ballot issues to one subject. The Las Vegas Review-Journal and a release from the ACLU of Nevada report on the decision. The petition is part of a national campaign by a Christian anti-abortion organization, PersonhoodUSA, to find a way to overturn Roe v. Wade. Personhood Nevada says it will appeal yesterday's decision to the Nevada Supreme Court.

Cert. Denied In Establishment Clause Challenge To Sheriff's Christian Speaker

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday denied certiorari in Milwaukee Deputy Sheriff's Association v. Clarke, Docket No. 09-460 (Jan. 11, 2010), refusing to review the 7th Circuit's decision in the case. (Order List.) In the case below, the Court of Appeals held that a Wisconsin sheriff's department violated the Establishment Clause when it invited representatives of the Fellowship of the Christian Centurions, a peer support group for law enforcement officers, to speak at several mandatory employee meetings.

IRS Updates Procedures For Obtaining Non-Profit Determinations

The Internal Revenue Service today published Rev. Proc. 2010-9 (Jan. 11, 2010), updating the procedures for issuing of determination letters and rulings under Sections 501 of the Internal Revenue Code on the exempt status of non-profit organizations. This includes religious organizations applying for non-profit status. The major change instituted in this revision is the centralization of the responsibility for processing applications in the Exempt Organizations Determinations office in Cincinnati, Ohio. Key district offices no longer exist.

Catholic Bishops Press Congress For Immigration Reform In 2010

Last week, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops announced a new campaign for immigration reform in 2010. USCCB is taking three step: (1) launching a nationwide postcard campaign as part of its "Justice of Immigrants" campaign; (2) launching two new websites-- Justice for Immigrants and National Migration Week; and (3) sending out a nationwide action alert asking for Congress to quickly enact immigration reform. Bishop John C. Webster said that an important principle is pressing for reforms so individuals can find work in their home countries and not be forced to emigrate. The San Bernadino Sun on Saturday covered the Bishop's new initiative. It quotes Steven Camarota, Director of the Center for Immigration Studies, who says that most parishioners do not agree with the Bishops' call to help illegal immigrants.

White House Introduces Commerce Department Faith-Based Head

Last week, the White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships posted an interview with Cedric Grant, Director of the faith-based office at the Department of Commerce. Grant says his most important activity so far has been outreach efforts for the 2010 Census. He explains: "Clergy are the most trusted voices in communities and are great advocates to bring awareness and participation in the 2010 Census. Community leaders, both faith-based and secular, know their communities intimately and service hard- to- count populations through their various programs."

Utah County Will Balance Budget By Police Fee, Including On Churches

Salt Lake County, Utah is proposing to balance its budget by assessing a law enforcement fee on homes, businesses, churches and non-profits. Yesterday's Salt Lake Tribune reports that the amount of the annual fee will depend on the demand for police services that is generated by the particular type of property. For example, big box stores would pay $13,584; taverns would pay $1,044 and preschools would pay $588. Under the plan, which the County Council will vote on today, churches would pay $1,008 per year, while smaller non-profits would be assessed $180. Some 41 churches in the unincorporated county would be covered by the new fees. A number of clergy object to imposing the fee on churches in the county.

Recent Articles and Book of Interest

From SSRN:

• Cornelia Koch, Classroom Crucifixes, Teacher Headscarves, Faith Healers and More - The German Experience of Religious Freedom Under a Bill of Rights, (U. of Adelaide Law Research, Aug. 13, 2009).
• Adam S. Hofri-Winogradow, The Muslim-Majority Character of Israeli Constitutional Law, (Middle East Law and Governance, Vol. 2, No. 2, February 2010).
• Peter Rizov, Definition of Religion: Honest Conviction, Regardless of Perception, in a Predominantly Non-Secular Subject Matter, (February 23, 2009).
• Caroline Mala Corbin, Ceremonial Deism and the Reasonable Religious Outsider, (UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, Forthcoming).
• David C. Gray, Constitutional Faith and Dynamic Stability: Thoughts on Religion, Constitutions, and Transitions to Democracy, (Maryland Law Review, Vol. 69, p. 26, 2009).
• Debora Threedy, Claiming the Shields: Law, Anthropology, and the Role of Storytelling in a NAGPRA Repatriation Case Study, (Journal of Land, Resources & Environmental Law, Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 91, 2009).
• Samuel J. Levine, Miranda, Dickerson, and Jewish Legal Theory: The Constitutional Rule in a Comparative Analytical Framework, (Maryland Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 1, 2009).
• Micah Schwartzman, The Sincerity of Public Reason, (Journal of Political Philosophy, Forthcoming).
• Geoffrey P. Miller, Golden Calves, Stone Tablets and Fundamental Law, (NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-02, Jan. 4, 2010).

New Book:

• Michael J. Perry, The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy, (Cambridge Univ. Press, Nov. 2009).

Indian Buddhists Protest Hindu Control Over Temple

In India, a group of Buddhists have gone on a hunger strike to protest the governance arrangements of the Mahabodhi Temple, in the holy city of Gaya in the province of Bihar. Pakistan's Daily Times yesterday reported that the strikers, in a makeshift tent just outside the office of the Bodhgaya Temple Management Committee object to a law enacted 60 years ago that sets up an 8-member committee to run the Temple. The committee has 4 Buddhist and 4 Hindu members, and the chairman must be the local district magistrate who must be Hindu. Buddhists argue that this gives Hindus control over a Buddhist holy site.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Merring v. O'Brien, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120 (MD PA, Jan. 4, 2010), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that he was not provided with a Bible when he was booked and he did not receive one for three weeks, despite his complaints.

In Robinson v. Jacquez, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121732 (ND CA, Dec. 8, 2009), a California federal district court held that a Jewish inmate's complaint properly states a cognizable claim against a prison's warden for acquiescing in the prison's policy of denying kosher diets and Jewish religious services.

In Goodvine v. Swiekatowski, (WD WI, Jan. 4, 2010), a Wisconsin federal district court held that an inmate could move ahead with his damage claim alleging that a prison chaplain refused to provide him with a Qur'an even though the chaplain provided Christian prisoners with Bibles.

In Kanda v. Walker, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 784 (ED CA, Jan. 6, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge recommended denying a preliminary injunction to a Hindu inmate who requested a religious diet containing no meat, and prepared with separate utensils and kitchenware.

In Kendrick v. Faust, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122114 (ED AR, Dec. 16, 2009), an Arkansas federal magistrate judge that an inmate be permitted to proceed with her claim that prison authorities destroyed her Catholic Bible on multiple occasions. However the magistrate recommended dismissal of a claim that the inmate was told by correctional officers that she was in a "southern Baptist prison" and was not permitted to practice any other religion.

Pennsylvania Court Rejects Catholic Day Care's Challenge To Licensing Rules

In St. Elizabeth's Child Care Center v. Department of Public Welfare, (PA Comnwlth. Ct., Jan. 7, 2010), a Pennsylvania state appellate court rejected free exercise challenges by a Catholic child day-care center to the requirement that it obtain a state certificate of compliance in order to operate. St. Elizabeth's argued that state regulations would significantly burden its religious mission to assist parents in raising their children and forming in them a Christian personality. The court concluded, however, that St. Elizabeth's had "failed to identify any actual or imminent infringement" on its rights.

Prop 8 Trial Begins Monday With Dispute Over Televising of Proceedings

In San Francisco tomorrow, the federal district court trial challenging the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8 barring same-sex marriage begins. (See prior posting.) Invoking a policy change instituted by the Ninth Circuit in December, the district court is permitting limited televising of the trial. Proceedings will be taped by court personnel and will be posted on YouTube at the end of the day. Intent on keeping the taping under the control of court personnel, Chief Judge John Walker rejected an offer by In Session (formerly Court TV) to broadcast the trial live. (The Recorder, 1/7.) Proponents of Proposition 8 are unhappy fearing intimidation of witnesses by same-sex marriage backers. Their appeal to the 9th Circuit of the district court's order permitting televising of the proceedings was denied by the appeals court on Friday. (Mercury News, 1/8.) Proposition 8 backers quickly filed an appeal with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy who has given the other side until noon today to respond. (New York Times, 1/9).

UPDATE: Justice Kennedy referred the appeal on broadcasting of the trial to the full court. On Monday the Court stayed the trial court's order thereby temporarily banning streaming of the proceedings to other court houses as well as any wider broadcasting of the proceedings. The stay remains in effect only until Wednesday to giver the Court more time to examine the issue. Justice Breyer dissented urging further consideration of the issue without a stay being imposed. (Order in Dennis v. Kristin, Sup. Ct., Jan. 11, 2010.) (CBN reports on the Supreme Court's action.)

Study Shows Faith-Based Initiative Increased Interest, But Not Social Services By Congregations

An interesting post at Call & Response blog yesterday by Duke University Prof. Mark Chaves, Director of the National Congregations Study, analyzes the actual impact of President George W. Bush's Faith-Based Initiative on religious congregations. He concludes that:

data from 1998 and 2006-07 show that neither the overall percent of congregations that report social services (82% in 2006), nor the percent with a staff person devoting at least quarter-time to social services (11%), nor the percent who received government funding (4%), have increased since 1998. Not even the level of collaboration (whether or not money is involved) between congregations and government or secular nonprofit organizations increased.....

Despite this stability in congregational social service activity, ... congregational interest in social services increased since 1998. The number of congregations that would like to apply for government money to support social service programs increased from 39% in 1998 to 47% in 2006-07. The number of congregations who hosted a speaker from a social service organization increased from 22 to 31%. And the number who recently conducted a community needs assessment jumped from 37 to 48%. These are impressive increases, probably representing an increased level of congregational interest in social services generated by media attention to faith-based initiatives and by the mistaken belief by some congregational leaders that there would be government money specifically set aside to support congregations’ human service activities.

More data for the National Congregations Study is in the June 2009 Report titled: American Congregations at the Beginning of the 21st Century. ABP News also reports on Chaves' conclusions.

Many Issues of Religon and Human Rights Remain In Latest Kenya Draft Constitution

Kenya is in the complex process of drafting and adopting a new constitution. (See prior posting.) The public comment period on the Committee of Experts' draft expired Dec. 15. It was supposed to be redrafted taking the comments into account, forwarded to the Parliamentary Select Committee on the Constitution, and then forwarded to the National Assembly which is to hold a referendum on it. (Sunday Nation 12/11/09). However today's Sunday Nation reports that the redraft forwarded to the Parliamentary Select Committee does not reflect some of the changes to the Bill of Rights proposed by churches, civil society organizations and human rights lobbies. Issues still remain over the document's language on abortion, its provisions on Islamic law, issues of family, of same-sex marriage, protection of religious institutions that wish to hire on the basis of religion, protection of children and the right to education and housing. The Parliamentary Select Committee is now expected to seek consensus on various issues and return the document to the Committee of Experts for redrafting.

Suit Charges Company With Forcing Scientology On Employees

A state court lawsuit filed last month in Bound Brook, New Jersey charges that a health and wellness company, Open House Direct, forced two former employees to take courses in Scientology in order to keep their jobs. One of the employees, Maurice Grays, charges that company co-owner John Buckley harassed him to become a Scientologist and forced him to buy a Scientology library and pay course tuition. According to today's Somerville (NJ) Courier News, both of the employees were eventually fired. The lawsuit also alleges that the company uses Scientology-based literature to train employees in sales and business administration. John Buckley, who denies the charges, has just taken on a new responsibility in addition to the company. He has become a member of the Bound Brook Borough Council.

Pennsylvania Says Hasidic Jewish Summer Camp Does Not Qualify For Property Tax Exemption

In Mesivtah Eitz Chaim of Bobov, Inc. v. Pike County Board of Assessment Appeals, (PA Comnwlth. Ct., Dec. 29, 2009), a Pennsylvania appellate court upheld the denial of a property tax exemption to a 60-acre Jewish summer camp located in Pennsylvania and operated by the Bobov Orthodox Jewish community (also known as the Bobover Hasidim) headquartered in Brooklyn, N.Y. The camp attracts boys from New York, Canada, England and Israel. Pennsylvania has a series of criteria that an organization must meet in order to qualify for a tax exemption as a "purely public charity." The court agreed that the camp "benefits a substantial and indefinite class of persons who are the legitimate subjects of charity," but it did not meet a second requirement that "it relieves the government of some of its burden." The court reasoned:

Mesivtah did not present any evidence that the camp’s recreational and food facilities alleviate any local community burdens in Pike County.... In addition, although the food facilities are open to the public, the general public does not use the camp's facilities.

In Canada, Fired Minister of Historic Church No Longer In Contempt of Earlier Order

In British Methodist Episcopal Church v. Davis, (ON Ct. App., Jan. 8, 2010), an Ontario (Canada) Court of Appeal held that the former minister of the historic British Methodist Episcopal Church in Guelph (ON) was no longer in contempt of a prior lower court order requiring her to deliver all documents, records and property of the church in her possession, not interfere with any religious services and not attend the church without consent of church officials. According to yesterday's Guelph Mercury, the dispute began in July 2008 when Rev. Erica Davis was not reappointed pastor of the church that was built in 1880 by former slaves who had fled to Canada via the underground railroad. Davis claimed that the church had failed to pay her an agreed $248,000 in compensation. She also contended that church trustees had passed a resolution to transfer title to the church property to her-- a claim that the court rejected.

Literal Belief In Bible Becomes Issue In Alabama Gubernatorial Primary

Seven candidates are running in this year's Republican primary for Governor of Alabama. One of the candidates, Chancellor of the Department of Postsecondary Education, Bradley Byrne, is now under fire from opponents because of this statement quoted last November in the Mobile Press-Register: "I believe there are parts of the Bible that are meant to be literally true and parts that are not." On Wednesday at news conference at a Piggly Wiggly store in New Hope (AL) announcing his endorsement by the Alabama Retail Association, Bryne said the Press-Register had misquoted him. He added: "I believe the Bible is true. Every word of it." Press-Register Executive Editor Mike Marshall later responded that: "There is no way that the Press-Register misquoted Mr. Byrne in that story." American United's blog today comments on the controversy

Church's Appeal of Zoning Decision Is Only Partly Successful

In Our Savior Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Saville, (IL App., Dec. 31, 2009), an Illinois appellate court rejected a free exercise challenge to the Aurora (IL) Zoning Ordinance as well as a challenge under the Illinois Religious Freedom Restoration Act. At issue was the Church's application for zoning approval to build an addition to the church and a parking lot. The Church argued in part that provisions limiting the site plan review process-- as opposed to applying for a special use permit-- to churches on major thoroughfares was discriminatory. The court disagreed. However the court remanded the case to the trial court for it to examine whether denial of the Church's application for a special use permit violated the Church's substantive due process rights. The remand was occasioned by the fact that during the pendency of the appeal, the state legislature amended the law to grant trial courts de novo review powers over decisions denying a special use permit.

Protests, Church Attacks Greet Malaysian Decision on Use of "Allah" By Catholic Paper

In Malaysia, last week's High Court decision (see prior posting) allowing the Catholic newspaper, The Herald, to use the word "Allah" in its Malay-language edition to refer to God, has generated protests in mosques and arson attacks on four Christian churches. Today both the London Times and Al Jazeera report on developments. Molotov cocktails were thrown at four churches around Kuala Lumpur. Only one of the churches, the Metro Tabernacle Church, was seriously damaged. Speakers in mosques protested the court's decisions and protesters carried signs charging heresy. Police have stepped up security at churches and political leaders have condemned the attack. Also, apparently in reaction to the court ruling, the website of the Malaysian judiciary was hacked on Thursday and threatening messages were posted. The court's decision will be appealed and its implementation has been stayed while the appeal is pending.

UPDATE: AP reports that on Sunday, two more churches were fire bombed and a third was splashed with black paint. Government leaders and many Muslims have condemned the attacks. In Egypt, Syria and Indonesia Christians commonly use the word "Allah" to describe God.

President Sends Greetings On Orthodox Christmas

Yesterday the White House issued a statement (full text) from President Barack Obama extending warmest wishes to Orthodox Christians celebrating the Great Feast of the Nativity.

New Jersey Senate Rejects Same-Sex Marriage Bill

The New Jersey Senate yesterday voted down A818, the proposed Civil Marriage and Religious Protection Act that would have legalized same-sex marriage in the state. Yesterday's Christian Science Monitor and the Asbury Park Press report that the vote was 20 opposed, and 14 in favor, with 5 senators not voting. New Jersey already recognizes civil unions, but supporters of gay marriage say that there are still restrictions on insurance benefits available to couples who are only in civil unions. Opponents argued for the traditional definition of marriage, and said any change should be through a referendum.

(See prior related posting.)

Challenge To Military Prayers Dismissed For Failure To Exhaust Intramilitary Remedies

In Chalker v. Gates, (D KS, Jan. 7, 2010), a Kansas federal district court dismissed for failure to exhaust intramilitary remedies a claim by a soldier stationed at Ft. Riley that his rights were violated when he was required to attend three Army functions at which sectarian Christian prayers were delivered. One of the events was the "welcome home" ceremony after his unit returned from Iraq. Spc. Dustin Chalker's complaint alleged that mandatory attendance at these events violated the Establishment Clause and in effect created a "religious test" for him to serve as a soldier in violation of Art. VI of the Constitution. While concluding that Chalker had standing to bring the claims, the court said that he should have either filed a request for religious accommodation or filed an administrative Equal Opportunity complaint, instead of merely complaining through his chain of command. The suit was also filed by the Military Religious Freedom Foundation. AP yesterday reported on the decision.

Obama Says Must Engage With Muslims To Prevent Lone-Wolf Radicalizations

Yesterday, President Obama delivered widely-covered Remarks on Strengthening Intelligence and Aviation Security (full text) summarizing the results of initial reviews he ordered after the attempted Christmas-day bombing of a plane heading to Detroit. A portion of the President's remarks were addressed to the issue of al Qaeda's attempts to radicalize and recruit lone individuals around the world. He said:

And we know that the vast majority of Muslims reject al Qaeda. But it is clear that al Qaeda increasingly seeks to recruit individuals without known terrorist affiliations not just in the Middle East, but in Africa and other places, to do their bidding. That's why I've directed my national security team to develop a strategy that addresses the unique challenges posed by lone recruits. And that's why we must communicate clearly to Muslims around the world that al Qaeda offers nothing except a bankrupt vision of misery and death –- including the murder of fellow Muslims –- while the United States stands with those who seek justice and progress.

To advance that progress, we've sought new beginnings with Muslim communities around the world, one in which we engage on the basis of mutual interest and mutual respect, and work together to fulfill the aspirations that all people share -- to get an education, to work with dignity, to live in peace and security. That's what America believes in. That's the vision that is far more powerful than the hatred of these violent extremists.

AALS 2009 Newsletter Has Lengthy Law and Religion Bibliography

The Association of American Law Schools Section on Law and Religion has issued its December 2009 Newsletter containing a 35-page bibliography of articles, books and websites on law and religion published during the past year.

Irsaeli Court Overturns City's Freeze On Synagogue Construction

In Israel, a Tel Aviv District Court has ruled that construction of a planned Orthodox synagogue in the city of Netanya can proceed. Arutz Sheva reported on the case yesterday. Last March, Reform Jewish groups obtained an administrative order freezing all budgetary allocations for synagogue construction in the city until funding was made available for construction of a Reform synagogue as well. The freeze order was appealed and a lower court overturned the freeze. The Reform groups appealed, but the District Court dismissed the appeal, allowing construction to begin. The Reform groups were assessed court costs equivalent to $1300 (US) plus a 16% Value Added Tax.

New Report Ranks 50 Worst Countries For Persecuting Christians

The group Open Doors yesterday released its 2010 World Watch List of the 50 countries where persecution of Christians for religious reasons is most severe. The 10 worst in the list are: North Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Maldives, Afghanistan, Yemen, Mauritania, Laos and Uzbekistan. The rankings are compiled from a specially designed questionnaire that focuses on various aspects of religious liberty.

Indian Court Upholds Ban On Book Critical of Islam

In Bhasin v. State of Maharashtra, (Bombay High Ct., Jan. 6, 2010), India's High Court of Judicature at Bombay upheld a ban imposed by the State of Maharashtra on circulation of the book by R.V. Bhasin titled Islam – A Concept of Political World Invasion By Muslims. The government acted under Sec. 95 of the state's Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 which allows an order of forfeiture to be issued against any newspaper, book or document that promotes enmity or hatred against a group on religious grounds. In a 150-page opinion, the 3-judge court concluded:

The possibility of [the book] falling in the hands of an inflammable mob cannot be ruled out. The way this sensitive topic is handled by the author, it is likely to arouse the emotions or sensibilities of even strong minded people. We have held that criticism of Islam is permissible like criticism of any other religion and the book cannot be banned on that ground. But we have also held that the criticism of Islam is not academic. The author has gone on to pass insulting comments on Islam, Muslim community with particular reference to Indian Muslims. It is an aggravated form of criticism made with a malicious and deliberate intention to outrage the religious feelings of Muslims.

Reports today by DNA and Express News Service have additional details on the opinion.

CAIR Says New TSA Security Policies Target American Muslims

Last Sunday, in the wake of the unsuccessful attempt to bomb an airplane coming into Detroit, the Transportation Security Administration announced that it "is mandating that every individual flying into the U.S. ... traveling from or through nations that are state sponsors of terrorism or other countries of interest will be required to go through enhanced screening." On Tuesday, CAIR issued a press release complaining that this policy

will disproportionately target American Muslims who have family or spiritual ties to the Islamic world and therefore amount to religious and ethnic profiling.... Under these new guidelines, almost every American Muslim who travels to see family or friends or goes on pilgrimage to Mecca will automatically be singled out for special security checks -- that’s profiling.... While singling out travelers based on religion and national origin may make some people feel safer, it only serves to alienate and stigmatize Muslims and does nothing to improve airline security.

CAIR said that a policy is needed that looks at behavior, not faith or skin color. Yesterday's Detroit News carried a column by CAIR's Michigan Executive Director, Dawud Walid, making the point at greater length.

Proposed Russian Law Would Return State-Owned Religious Property To Orthodox Church

According to Interfax yesterday, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin says that a bill has been drafted to deal with transferring state-owned religious property back to the Russian Orthodox Church. Putin said that all assets must be transferred "in a proper form and accompanied by proper financial procedures." In a meeting with Patriarch Kirrill, Putin said he is certain that the Church and the government "will find the solutions that will return to regional organizations what they rightfully own rather than destroy what was created in the past years."

Challenge To Jail Holiday Music Dismissed

As previously reported, six lawsuits were filed in recent months against Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio by prisoners who object to his playing Christmas and holiday tunes all day long at all of the county's jails. The play list included Dr. Demento's Christmas album, with humorous holiday songs; Alvin and the Chipmunks; Elvis Presley, including "Blue Christmas"; Celtic chanting; traditional carols by the Mormon Tabernacle Choir; and a CD with titles such as "Feliz Navidad," "Ramadan," "Betelehui," "Over the Skies of Ysrael," and "A Christmas/ Kwanzaa/ Solstice/ Chanukah/ Ramadan/ Boxing Day Song." Four of the suits were dismissed earlier, and now an Arizona federal district court has issued an opinion dismissing one of the remaining challenges.

In Curley v. Arpaio, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199 (D AZ, Jan. 4, 2010), the court rejected an Establishment Clause challenge concluding that "Defendant presents a neutral, secular purpose for playing holiday music--to reduce inmate tension at a difficult time of year for inmates, and to promote safety in the jails.... [T]here were no religious activities or prayer, and the secular music diluted any religious effect." The federal court declined jurisdiction over plaintiff's other claim that the music violated the provision in the Arizona Constitution (Art. II, Sec. 12) barring the expenditure of any public funds for religious exercise.

9th Circuit: Asylum Application By Muslim Convert To Christianity Was Timely

In Taslimi v. Holder, (9th Cir., Jan. 4, 2010), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that an Iranian woman who had converted from Islam to Christianity while in the United States had not waited too long to apply for asylum. The conversion took place in 2002, ten years after she entered the United States on a one-year visitor's visa. The immigration judge concluded that Azra Taslimi was eligible for withholding of removal because it was likely her life or freedom would be threatened in Iran. However Taslimi preferred asylum since that would give her the chance to eventually become a legal permanent resident and eventually a citizen. (Background.) To obtain asylum, an individual must apply within one year of entering the country or within a "reasonable period" later after a change of circumstances (such as her conversion). Taslimi waited seven months after her conversion. The Court of Appeals concluded that this was reasonable because the conversion ceremony was merely the beginning of a process that called for spiritual growth. Taslimi did not apply for asylum immediately because she wanted to be sure that her conversion was going to be a life-long decision. The Los Angeles Metropolitan News-Enterprise reports on the decision.

Religious Parties Likely Banned In Bangladesh

BDNews24 reports on an important constitutional development in Bangladesh. In 2005, a High Court invalidated the Fifth Amendment to Bangladesh's Constitution which was meant to provide constitutional legitimacy to governments in power after the assassination of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1975. The amendment also, for the first time, permitted religion-based political parties. The Supreme Court stayed the High Court's invalidation after the government sought leave to appeal. However now the government has dropped its request to appeal and the Supreme Court lifted its stay. The Times of India today reports with the new Supreme Court decision, parties will be required to drop "Islam" from their name and may not use religion in campaigning. However there are still two more petitions pending for leave to appeal the High Court's decision. A hearing on those will be held January 18.

Indian Court Delays Start of Shariah-Compliant Investment Company

In India yesterday, the Kerala High Court ordered the Kerala government not to start operations of a proposed Islamic investment company in which the Kerala State Industrial Development Commission would hold 11% ownership. The company is to issue Shariah compliant investment products. Qatar's Peninsula and India's Economic Times today report that the temporary order was issued to permit the court to hear a challenge to the company filed by Janata Party leader Dr. Subramanian Swamy. His complaint argues that government participation in compliance with Shariah amounts to the State Government favoring a particular religion in violation of Articles 14 and 25 of the Indian Constitution. The CEO of the proposed company is required to report to the Shariah Advisory Board. The complaint argues that this means the Board will have some measure of supervision over the proposed company. The complaint also alleges that the proposed investment company violates the Banking Regulation Act of 1949.

Uzbek Court Rejcts Fines But Upholds Convictions of 3 Baptist Officials

Baptist Press yesterday reported that a court in Uzbekistan last month overturned high fines that were levied in October against the president of the Baptist Union, a Baptist Union accountant and a Baptist camp director. However their criminal convictions were left standing, as was the bar on their holding responsible positions in the Baptist Union for three years. The charges against the three of evading taxes and involving children in religious activities without their parents' consent grew out of assemblies held at the Joy Baptist Children's Camp. Some camp parents testified in favor of the three, while one parent who had signed a complaint said it had been dictated to her by prosecutors.

ACLU Enters Agreement With School Board Barring Bible Distribution

The ACLU of Tennessee announced yesterday that it had entered a Settlement Agreement (full text) with Wilson County (TN) school officials under which the schools agree to refrain from permitting the distribution of Bibles to students on school grounds during school hours. A demand letter (full text) was sent to the school board last October after an assembly was held for 5th graders at the district's Carroll-Oakland school. A member of the Gideons spoke, and each row of students was called up to take a Bible. Though their teacher told them it was not required they do so, not surprisingly all the students took a Bible. The parents who complained to the ACLU said their daughter took it only because of peer pressure. Back in their classroom, the teacher instructed students to write their names in their Bibles for their personal use.

Suit Challenges Oregon Law On Mandatory Workplace Meetings, But Not Religious Speech Provision

In Oregon, a business group, Associated Oregon Industries, had filed a federal lawsuit challenging Oregon's Senate Bill 519 that took effect January 1. The new law prohibits employers from firing or penalizing workers who refuse to attend employer-sponsored meetings discussing political issues or candidates, religious matters or union organizing. Plaintiffs object to the law's ban on their calling meetings to rebut union organizing. The complaint (full text) in Associated Oregon Industries v. Avakian, (D OR, filed 12/22/2009), claims that insofar as SB 519 applies to speech regarding whether employees should join a union, the law is pre-empted by the National Labor Relations Act. They also argue that SB 519's restrictions on speech opposing unionization violates their First Amendment free speech rights. Plaintiffs do not challenge the law's ban on forcing employees to listen to religious or other types of political speech. Yesterday's Newberg (OR) Graphic reported on the lawsuit.

In Florida, Quaker High School Teacher Sues Claiming Discrimination

In Ocala, Florida, teacher Ronald Wray has filed suit against the Marion County School Board charging that he was effectively forced to resign from his construction teaching position at Marion Technical Institute because of a hostile work environment. Wray, a Quaker, claims that principal Mark Vianello objected to his religious-inspired black clothing. According to a report yesterday from the Ocala Star-Banner, Wray resigned in 2007 after the principal told him "not to come to school with a Blues Brothers or Johnny Cash look," called him a "nut job," and threatened not to let him walk in graduation because of his dress, among other threats. He says the principal passed him over for a promotion and threatened to blackball him and his wife from other teaching positions. After he resigned, Wray ran for school superintendent position, but lost. His lawsuit alleges violations of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Apparently Wray now teaches at South Fort Myers High School.

Court Says Minister's Breach of Contract Claim Might Be Able To Proceed

In Mundie v. Christ United Church of Christ, (PA Super, Dec. 31, 2009), a Pennsylvania appellate court refused to dismiss at this stage of the litigation a breach of contract lawsuit by a pastor who had been terminated by his congregation's Consistory. The trial court, accepting defendant's First Amendment argument, had held it lacked jurisdiction because the dispute was ecclesiastical in nature. The appellate court, however, held that plaintiff should first be given an opportunity to show that he can prove his case without resort to evidence that would excessively entangle the court with church matters.

Businessman Creates Protest To Swiss Ban on Minarets

Today's Wall Street Journal reports on the attention being given to a protest mounted by a Swiss businessman who strongly disagrees with the result of November's Swiss referendum banning any new construction of minarets. (See prior posting.) In Bussigny, Switzerland, businessman Guillaume Morand quickly constructed an illuminated 20-foot high plastic and wood minaret, attached to the chimney of his shoe store warehouse. Morand said: "The referendum was a scandal. I was ashamed to be Swiss. I don't have the power to do much, but I wanted to give a message of peace to Muslims." The Justice Ministry does not plan to take action against Morand. It says it regards the minaret as a temporary structure. Neither does the town's acting mayor who says this is not really a minaret since it has no connection to a mosque.

Report Details Crimes Against U.S. Christian Churches In 2009

Christian Post reported yesterday that a new report for 2009 on "Crimes Against Christian Organizations in the United States" indicates that there were at least 1,237 crimes committed against Christian churches and ministries in the United States last year. The report issued by the Christian Security Network says that over 700 of the incidents were burglaries.

Orthodox Church In Russia Poised For More Political Involvement

Yesterday's Georgian Daily says that Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirrill is positioning the Russian Orthodox Church for a greater role in Russian politics. The paper first cites a speech by Kirrill to the Russian Academy of State Service in which he argued that Russia should be judged by its unique values and not by "alien" European criteria-- a position that echos the views of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. Second, he has strongly criticized Europeans for surrendering their values to "passionate" Muslims. Finally Kirrill signed a new cooperation agreement with the Russian Academy of State Service, pressing the government to aid religious groups according to their relative size. The agreement opens the way for more priests to receive training at the Academy of State Service.

Attorney Hit With Rule 11 Sanctions For Campaign To Recuse Catholic Judge

A Florida federal district court judge has imposed extensive Rule 11 sanctions on attorney Loring Spotler who turned motions to force the judge to recuse himself into a "dogged and relentless" campaign against the judge when the motions were denied. In a group of cases captioned Bettis v. Toys "R" Us, (SD FL, Sept. 30, 2009), Judge William J. Zloch recounted the beginnings of the controversy:

Two years ago, in Sabatier and Bettis, Mr. Spolter claimed that I was a Catholic zealot bent on ruling against women who returned to work after giving birth. He extrapolated as much from the facts that I am Catholic, some of the law clerks I have hired attended Catholic law schools, and I have affiliations with the Federalist Society. Based on these facts, he moved for my recusal from both cases.

A 2007 ABA Journal article explained that the charges grew out of Judge Zloch's ties to Ave Maria Law School and his hiring three law clerks from the school. However they escalated into charges that the Clerk's Office was engaged in a conspiracy to undercut the random assignment of cases to different judges. Judge Zloch concluded in his opinion:

In these collected cases there is no question that Mr. Spolter acted in bad faith, both objective and subjective, when he filed his Motions To Recuse. He filed these Motions knowing they had no basis in fact or law and he continued to defend them in the face of overwhelming evidence of their baselessness.... He did this for an improper purpose: to defame and cast a cloud over the Federal judiciary in relentless pursuit of recusal.

The court imposed $99,140 of defendants' attorneys fees and on Spotler, and fined Spotler an additional $10,000. In addition he suspended Spotler from practice before the federal court for 42 months and referred Spotler to the Florida bar. The ABA Journal yesterday reported on the decision.

South African President Takes 3rd Wife In Zulu Ceremony

South African President Jacob Zuma yesterday married his third wife in a traditional Zulu ceremony, according to the London Guardian. The Zulu tribe practices polygamy by tradition, and it is recognized under South African law. South Africa's Constitution (Sec.31) protects the cultural practices of Zulus and other groups. Zuma's new wife is Tobeka Madiba, described as a socialite from Durban. Zuma apparently has fathered three children with Madiba. The 67-year old Zuma is also planning to add yet another wife before long. Gloria Bongi Ngema, who now works for IBM in Johannesburg and who has a child by Zuma, presented umbondo (gifts) to the Zuma family last week, customarily a precursor to marriage. The Johannesburg Times yesterday reported that Christian Democratic Party leader Rev. Theunis Botha strongly criticized Zuma, saying that Zuma's "alarming return to ancestral worship is a giant step back into the dark ages."

Recent Articles and Book of Interest

From SmartCILP:

• Steven F. Friedell, Some Observations About Jewish Law in Israel's Supreme Court, 8 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 659-700 (2009).


• Jose Gabilondo, Institutional Pluralism from the Standpoint of Its Victims: Calling the Question on Indiscriminate (In)tolerance [Abstract], 21 Law & Literature 387-401 (2009).


• Michael P. Moreland, Universalism and Particularism in Bioethics: Lessons from Theological Ethics [Abstract], 21 Law & Literature 415-430 (2009).


• Johannes Reich, Switzerland: Freedom of Creed and Conscience, Immigration, and Public Schools in the Postsecular State--Compulsory Coeducational Swimming Instruction Revisited, 7 I.Con: International Journal of Constitutional Law 754-767 (2009).


• Nicholas Wolterstorff, Donald A. Giannella Memorial Lecture: Can Human Rights Survive Secularization?, 54 Villanova Law Review 411-420 (2009).


• Constitutional Law Symposium: Global Perspectives on Religion, the State, and Constitutionalism. Articles by Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im, Thomas F. Farr, Frank S. Ravitch, Richard W. Garnett, Laura Dudley Jenkins and T. Jeremy Gunn. 57 Drake Law Review 829-984 (2009).


• The Federalist Society Religious Freedom Panel. Religious Liberties: The International Religious Freedom Act. William L. Saunders, moderator; Thomas F. Farr, Richard W. Garnett, IV and T. Jeremy Gunn, panelists. 31 Houston Journal of International Law 469-514 (2009).

The Journal of Church & State, Vol 51, No. 2, Spring 2009 has recently been issued.

Recent Book:

• Jytte Klausen, The Cartoons that Shook the World, (Yale Univ. Press., Sept. 2009).

Virgina Muslim Prison Chaplains Want More State Support

Virginia is one of the few states that does not have its own staff of professional chaplains. Instead it contracts with the Chaplain Service of the Churches of Virginia, a Protestant group, to provide religious programs for inmates of all faiths. The chaplain group receives $780,000 per year from the prison commissary fund to help subsidize its activities. Today's Lynchburg (VA) News & Advance reports that the all-volunteer Muslim Chaplain Service, which for the first time was recently awarded a $25,000 grant from the state, wants more state funding so it can hire more imams to serve prisoners. The Protestant Chaplain Service agrees that more Muslim chaplains are needed to serve the 1,700 to 2,500 Muslims in Virginia prisons and to prevent radicalization through "jailhouse Islam."

Report Says Egypt Court Upholds Ban of Niqab In University Exam Rooms

Reuters and UAE's The National report that yesterday an administrative court in Cairo, Egypt upheld the decision by higher education minister Hany Helal and heads of three universities to bar women from wearing the niqab (full face veil) while taking university exams. The government said that the ban was imposed in part because students (male and female) were taking exams disguised as others by wearing the face veil. Some three weeks ago, ANSAmed reported that a Cairo administrative tribunal had invalidated the ban on the niqab in exam rooms and university areas. (See prior posting.) It is not clear what the relationship is between the two decisions.

A Survey of Law & Religion Casebooks For Law Schools

As the new semester is about to begin, here is a listing of casebooks and teaching materials on law and religion designed for law schools and law students available from major law book publishers (listed alphabetically by author):

• Ariens & Destro, Religious Liberty in a Pluralistic Society, 2d ed., (Carolina Academic Press, 2002).
• Belsky & Bessler-Northcutt, Law and Theology, (Carolina Academic Press, 2005).
• Berg's The State and Religion in a Nutshell, 2d (West Pub., 2004).
• Brownstein and Jacobs's Global Issues in Freedom of Speech and Religion: Cases and Materials (West Pub., 2008).
• Gey, Fonvielle & Hinkle, Religion and the State, 2d ed, (Matthew Bender, 2006).
• Griffin's Law and Religion, Cases and Materials (Foundation Press, 2006) with 2009 Supplement.
• Loewy's Religion and the Constitution: Cases and Materials (West Pub., 1998) with 2002 Supplement.
• McConnell, Harvey & Berg, Religion and the Constitution, 2d ed., (Aspen Publishers, 2006).
• Noonan and Gaffney's Religious Freedom: History, Cases and Other Materials on the Interaction of Religion and Government, 2d ed. (Foundation Press, 2010) (available 4/2010, earlier edition currently available).
• Ravitch's Law and Religion, A Reader: Concepts, Cases and Theory, 2d ed. (West Pub., 2004).
• Volokh's The Religion Clauses and Related Statutes: Problems, Cases and Policy Arguments (Foundation Press, 2005).
  
• UPDATE: Conkle's Constitutional Law - The Religion Clauses, 2d edition (Turning Point Series), (Foundation Press 2009).

Proposed Monument To Secular Government Raises Opposition

Yesterday's Cumberland (MD) Times-News reports on a battle over monuments on public property that has a new twist. Edward W. Taylor Jr., of the Cumberland Historic Cemetery Organization, is objecting to the decision by the Allegany County(MD) Board of Commissioners to allow a monument honoring the U.S. Constitution to be placed on the county court house lawn. It would join a statue of George Washington and a Ten Commandments monument already there. The problem, however, according to opponents is that the new monument will contain an engraving that it was donated by Citizens for a Secular Government. Taylor says that the United States was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, and that the word "secular" should not be included on a monument on public property. He says that backers should place the monument on provate property if they want to put it up. The person behind the new monument to the Constitution is Dr. Jeffrey Davis who, in 2004, led an unsuccessful effort to have the Ten Commandments monument removed from the court house lawn.

British Clergy Want Health & Safety Law Protection

In Britain, clergy are seeking to get legislation to protect their safety in the work place. Today's London Telegraph reports that the Church of England succeeded in 2005 in preventing clergy from being covered by the health and safety laws that protect other employees. Clergy are treated as "office holders" rather than employees. However Unite, the union that represents priests, says that things such as faulty wiring, toppled gravestones and tiles falling off roofs are placing clergy in harms way, as is a lack of security at many vicarages. The government's Department for Business, Innovation and Skills is looking into whether health and safety legislation should be expanded to include clergy.

Hamas Hands Out Islamic Robes To Young Women In Gaza

In Gaza, Hamas in cooperation with the Association of Young Muslim Women is beginning a project to hand out free Islamic robes and veils to young women in secondary schools. Xinhua today reports that the distribution began in two neighborhoods in east Gaza City where 600 robes were distributed. Another 600 will be distributed next week in a central Gaza City neighborhood. A spokesperson for the Association says: "the goal of this project is to disseminate the Islamic dress code and effectively eliminate the wanton behavior." However apparently some of the girls are primarily interested in getting new clothing to replace their worn out clothes that they cannot afford to replace on their own. Hamas' official position is that it is not trying to implement Islamic law in Gaza, but officials in the Hamas government have supported various Islamic virtue campaigns. (See prior

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Peyton v. Felker, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120287 (ED CA, Dec. 7, 2009), a California federal district court dismissed, with leave to amend, an inmate's claim that two prison officials retaliated against him after he exercised his First Amendment right to practice his religion.

In Riva v. Secretary of Public Safety, 2009 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1348 (App. Ct. MA, Dec. 24, 2009), a Massachusetts state appeals court, without reaching the merits, dismissed a claim by a Muslim prisoner who wanted removal of a Nation of Islam chaplain who had been appointed on an interim basis to lead services for Orthodox Muslims. He sought to have a traditional Muslim chaplain appointed, or Muslim inmates lead Friday Jumu'ah services. The court held the wrong parties had been named and that sovereign immunity existed as to a RLUIPA damage claim.

In Howard v. Epps, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120182 (SD MS, Dec. 23, 2009), a Mississippi federal district court adopted recommendations of a federal magistrate judge (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120204, Oct. 30, 2009) and dismissed a complaint by a Rastafarian prisoner that he was not permitted to grow his hair in dreadlocks in accordance with his religious beliefs.

Atheist Group Challenges Ireland's New Blasphemy Law

Ireland's new blasphemy law came into force yesterday. It prohibits intentionally causing outrage among a substantial number of adherents of any religion by publishing or uttering grossly abusive insults to matters held sacred by the religion. Yesterday's London Guardian reported that to challenge the law, a group known as Atheist Ireland published "25 Blasphemous Quotations" on its website. The quotes were from famous figures ranging from Jesus to Mark Twain to Frank Zappa. Atheist Ireland's leader says the group will challenge the blasphemy law through the courts if they are charged under it. Yesterday also was International Blasphemy Day, and Atheist Ireland used the occasion to announce that it was launching a broad-based campaign to both obtain repeal of the blasphemy law and attain a secular Irish Constitution. [Thanks to Scott Mange for a lead on this.]

Danish Cartoonist Who Drew Muhammad Caricature Is Attacked In His Home

In Aaarhus, Denmark yesterday, a 28-year old Somali man broke into the house of cartoonist Kurt Westegaard armed with an axe and a knife, shouting that he wanted to kill the 74-year old Westegaard. Westegaard drew the now-famous caricature of the Prophet Muhammad with a bomb in his turban that was published along with 11 other cartoons in 2005 by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. The cartoons set off a series of violent demonstrations around the world. (See prior posting.) Today BBC News reports that Westegaard, who was at home with his 5-year old granddaughter, locked himself into a safe room and pressed a special panic button alerting police to the attacker. The suspect, who could not be named under Danish law, tried but failed to break into the safe room and then attacked police with his axe when they arrived. Police shot the suspect outside Westegaard's home. The head of Denmark's intelligence agency says that the attack was "terror related." Apparently the suspect is connected to the radical al-Shabab group in Somalia.

Happy 2010 To Religion Clause Readers!

Dear Religion Clause Readers:

Happy New Year! As we enter 2010, I want to again thank all of you who read Religion Clause-- both long time followers and those who have joined us more recently. With the advent of the Obama administration last January, some readers asked me whether there would continue to be sufficient church-state and religious liberty developments to sustain the blog. I think the past year has shown that this should not have been a concern.

It has been a good year for Religion Clause blog. The site meter shows that the blog has attracted over 672,000 visits since it began in 2005. Approximately 241,700 of these visits were registered in 2009-- a 17% increase over 2008. I continue to seek out additional ways for readers to access Religion Clause. This year I added a feed on Twitter (@ReligionClause). So in addition to the standard method of reading Religion Clause at its URL, you can subscribe to RSS feeds on your favorite RSS reader, subscribe by e-mail, find postings on Lexis through Newstex, log onto Twitter or purchase a subscription to read on your Kindle. Scroll to the bottom of the Religion Clause sidebar to click on various subscription options. One warning however: many of these alternative methods of access do not pick up an item a second time when an Update has been added.

Religion Clause's established format of strict neutrality, broad coverage and links to extensive primary source material has made it a widely-recognized authoritative source for keeping up on church-state and religious liberty developments around the world. I am pleased that my regular readers span the political and religious spectrum. So, while the blog represents a rather substantial investment of time on my part, so long as it continues to serve this unique role, I hope to continue it.

This year, moderating comments has become a more difficult issue. First, I have had a significant increase in robo-generated spam comments. Second, while I attempt to allow a very broad spectrum of views and approaches, I have had to delete some comments that are defamatory, repetitive, hostile, irrelevant or which otherwise impair the blog's usefulness as a neutral resource on legal issues and policy developments. Often I am able to moderate comments several times a day, but sometimes there may be a delay of as much as one or two days in my getting to them.

Finally, I want to thank all of you who send me leads to new developments, or who alert me to needed corrections. These help me assure that coverage is complete and accurate. I read all of your e-mails and appreciate receiving them, even though I cannot always acknowledge them. Normally when I blog on a story sent to me by a reader, I mention the sender. If you do not want me to mention you, I will be happy to honor that request if you let me know when sending me information.

Best wishes for 2010!

Howard M. Friedman

Jordan Seeks Dead Sea Scrolls From Canada Under UN Convention

Invoking the the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, the government of Jordan has asked Canada to seize the portion of the 2000-year old Dead Sea Scrolls that are on display until January 3 from Israel at Toronto's Royal Ontario Museum. Canada, Jordan and Israel have all signed the Convention and its First Protocol. (Signers of Convention, Protocol.) The Convention is aimed at assuring that cultural property is not damaged during armed conflict. Yesterday's Toronto Globe and Mail reports that while the first seven Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in caves near the Dead Sea in 1947 by Bedouin Arabs and found their way to Israel, the majority of the Scrolls were found in the next seven years in operations supervised by Jordan on land it occupied west of the Jordan River. The thousands of fragments found were taken to the Palestine Archeological Museum in East Jerusalem. When Israel captured East Jerusalem in the 1967 Six Day War, the Israel Antiquities Authority took possession of the Scrolls to conserve and exhibit them at the Israel Museum.

The First Protocol (Art. I, Sec. 2) to the Hague Convention, which has been signed by Canada, Jordan and Israel, is designed to prevent exportation of cultural property during an armed conflict. It requires each signatory:

to take into its custody cultural property imported into its territory either directly or indirectly from any occupied territory. This shall either be effected automatically upon the importation of the property or, failing this, at the request of the authorities of that territory.

Canada's Cultural Property Export and Import Act Sec. 36.1(4), implementing the Convention, provides:

If the government of a State Party submits a request in writing to the Minister for the recovery and return of any cultural property that has been exported from an occupied territory of that State Party and that is in Canada in the possession of or under the control of any person, institution or public authority, the Attorney-General of Canada may institute an action in the Federal Court or in a superior court of a province for the recovery of the property by the State Party.

Israel argues that the temporary loan of the Scrolls for display in Canada does not amount to "exportation" under the Hague Convention, and that the Scrolls, which it says it is merely holding as custodian, are part of the Jewish heritage. Palestinians argue that the Scrolls are also part of their heritage. [Thanks to Vos Iz Neias? for the lead.]

Ex-Indonesian President, Moderate Religious Reformer, Dies

Voice of America reports that former Indonesian president Abdurrahman Wahid (know as Gus Dur) died on Wednesday at the age of 69. In a release issued yesterday, U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom chair Leonard Leo paid tribute to Dur's interfaith initiatives. He said:

Gus Dur was a renowned religious reformer, a voice of moderation when his country needed it most, and a bridge between Muslims and people of other faiths. His unique voice and perspective will be missed.... His life's mission was to increase religious understanding and reduce religious extremism worldwide. Though the world produces few men of his talents, the mission he lived for should be everyone's goal.

Claims Against Jewish Newspaper Dismissed To Avoid Religious Entanglement

In Abdelhak v. Jewish Press, Inc., (NJ App. Div., Dec. 31, 2009), a New Jersey appellate court dismissed a complaint alleging defamation, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress on the ground that the claims could not be decided without excessively entangling the court in matters of religious doctrine and practice. At issue was a lawsuit by an Orthodox Jewish doctor who was falsely listed by a Jewish newspaper in its "Seruv Listing," a list of men who had been formally held in contempt by a Jewish religious court for refusing to comply with an order to give their wives a Get (Jewish divorce document). (Background.) Plaintiff argued that there cannot be excessive entanglement in violation of the Establishment Clause when the cause of action is secular and the defendants are not religious figures. The court, however, rejected this contention and applied the abstention doctrine, reasoning that:

to evaluate whether plaintiff's reputation suffered any injury, a jury would, of necessity, be required to determine how a Seruv Listing is viewed within the Orthodox Jewish community and whether an Orthodox Jew would be offended by another's refusal to provide a Get. To make that determination, a jury would be obliged to consider the intricacies of Jewish doctrine. Such consideration would require a jury to delve deeply into the importance of giving a Get and the disdain heaped on a man who refuses one.

[Thanks to Bridget Englard for the lead.]

Connecticut School Will Move Graduation Away From Cathedral

The South Windsor, Connecticut, Board of Education has voted to move South Windsor High School's 2010 graduation from the First Cathedral in Bloomfield to the Connecticut Convention Center in Hartford. The move came after Americans United and the ACLU threatened to sue the Enfield school system which also uses the Cathedral, and made preliminary inquiries of South Windsor. (See prior posting.) Wednesday's Hartford Courant reports that the Cathedral has charged fees of $7400 to $8000 for schools to use its facilities. The Enfield school board will consider whether to move its schools' graduations as well when it meets in January.

UPDATE: ACLU announced on Feb. 9 that the Windsor (CT) Board of Education has voted to move its graduation away from The First Cathedral. With this decision, all 5 districts that had been using the church have now decided to hold their ceremonies elsewhere.