Closing Arguments In Trial Challenging InnerChange

The Des Moines Register reports on closing arguments that were presented Friday by lawyers in federal district court in Iowa in a case challenging InnerChange, a faith-based prison treatment program. Operating in Iowa and elsewhere, inmates in the program immerse themselves in Christian values. (See prior related postings 1, 2.) Americans United for the Separation of Church and State has sued Iowa prison officials and Prison Fellowship Ministries, which operates the program, claiming that InnerChange violates the Establishment Clause. The suit seeks repayment of $1.5 million in state funds that have been used for InnerChange.

Lawyers for Americans United argue that the program "requires and coerces inmates to take part in religious activities." They say it discriminates against other religious beliefs, particularly Catholicism, and provides special privileges to participants. These include an opportunity to complete treatment classes required for parole earlier than they could otherwise. Defense lawyers dispute these claims, saying no one is forced to participate and that participants receive no preference for paroles. "Inmates of all faiths and no faiths are welcome," said Anthony Troy, a lawyer for Prison Fellowship. He says that those of other faiths who join the program can continue to observe their traditions

2 Prisoners Successful, 1 Is Not, In 3 Free Exercise Cases

Opinions in three prisoner free exercise cases have recently become available.

In Bess v. Alameda, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6079 (ED Cal., Feb. 16, 2006), a Magistrate Judge in a California federal district court recommended that a motion for summary judgment by prison officials be denied because they had failed to carry their burden of showing that their restrictions on inmates receiving religious books and materials were necessary, nor did they show they were in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and were the least restrictive means of furthering that interest. Plaintiff, a state prison inmate complained that his free exercise rights under the Constitution and RLUIPA were being violated by a prison mail room practice of returning religious mail to the sender marked "unauthorized", without notice to the inmate to whom it was addressed. He also claimed that greater restrictions were placed on receiving religious books and materials than on comparable secular material.

In Fulbright v. Evans, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40240 (WD Okl., Sept. 8, 2005), an Oklahoma federal Magistrate Judge recommended that a permanent injunction be granted that orders state prison officials to furnish plaintiff prisoners with a kosher diet. The opinion rejects defendants' claims that furnishing kosher food would violate the Establishment Clause, and accepts plaintiff's free exercise claims. The opinion concludes that the Department of Correction's "refusal to provide a kosher diet, in light of its provision of religious-based diets for other inmates without negative impact, is not entitled to total deference. Here, the record does not reflect more than a de minimis impact upon DOC's economic resources and does not reflect any significant negative impact upon the other concerns submitted by DOC as rational bases for the current policy."

In Murphy v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6118 (WD Mo., Jan. 30, 2006), a Missouri federal district court refused to grant a new trial to an inmate who claimed that erroneous jury instructions were given in his former trial involving free speech and RLUIPA claims. Among the instructions upheld by the court was one that characterized Plaintiff's request for religious accommodation as a request for "racially-segregated group services for the Christian Separatist Church". The court said that "racially-segregated" accurately describes the Christian Separatist Church.

Russian President Cautions About Religious Crimes

Interfax News Agency reports that last Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned the Internior Ministry board that law enforcement agencies have underestimated the threat posed by the outburst of xenophobic, racial, national and religious crimes in Russia.

Muhammad Cartoon Reaction Continues; Danish Editor Responds

Reaction around the world to publication of caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad continues with unbelievable intensity. Here is Saturday's summary of developments from an article by the Associated Press:

Nigerian Muslims protesting caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad attacked Christians and burned churches on Saturday, killing at least 15 people in the deadliest confrontation yet in the whirlwind of Muslim anger over the drawings.

It was the first major protest to erupt over the issue in Africa's most populous nation. An Associated Press reporter saw mobs of Muslim protesters swarm through the city center with machetes, sticks and iron rods. One group threw a tire around a man, poured gas on him and set him ablaze.

In Libya, the parliament suspended the interior minister after at least 11 people died when his security forces attacked rioters who torched the Italian consulate in Benghazi.

Right-wing Italian Reforms Minister Roberto Calderoli resigned under pressure, accused of fueling the fury in Benghazi by wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with one of the offending cartoons, first published nearly five months ago in a Danish newspaper.

Danish church officials met with a top Muslim cleric in Cairo, meanwhile, but made no significant headway in defusing the conflict.

And in what has become a daily event, tens of thousands of Muslims protested - this time in Britain, Pakistan and Austria - to denounce the perceived insult.

Meanwhile, Sunday's Washington Post carries an op-ed, Why I Published Those Cartoons, by Flemming Rose, culture editor of the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten (the paper in which the cartoons were first published). He says:

I commissioned the cartoons in response to several incidents of self-censorship in Europe caused by widening fears and feelings of intimidation in dealing with issues related to Islam. And I still believe that this is a topic that we Europeans must confront, challenging moderate Muslims to speak out. The idea wasn't to provoke gratuitously -- and we certainly didn't intend to trigger violent demonstrations throughout the Muslim world. Our goal was simply to push back self-imposed limits on expression that seemed to be closing in tighter.

UPDATE: On Sunday, two Saudi papers carried a full-page ad dated Feb. 5 in which Carsten Juste, the editor of Jyllands-Posten, apologized for the cartoons published by his paper. (Reuters.)

2nd Circuit Applies RFRA To Private ADEA Claim

On Thursday, the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued fascinating majority and dissenting opinions in a case in which a Methodist minister claimed that his church violated the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act by forcing him into retirement because he had reached the age of 70. In Hankins v. Lyght (2nd Cir., Feb. 16, 2006), Judge Winter’s majority opinion rejected the district court’s application of a “ministerial exception” in ADEA cases. It held, instead, that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act now sets out the controlling standard. Under RFRA, the case should be dismissed if the application of the ADEA would place a substantial burden on the exercise of religion by the church or its Bishop, unless it is shown that the ADEA furthers a compelling interest in the least restrictive manner. The majority remanded the case to the district court for it to apply the RFRA standards to the facts. In the course of reaching its conclusion, the majority also clearly held that RFRA was constitutional as applied to the interpretation of federal statutes.

Judge Sotomayor’s dissent argued first that the church and Bishop Lyght had waived reliance on RFRA, and instead were relying only on the free exercise and establishment clauses. Second, the dissent argued that RFRA only applies to claims against the government, and does not apply in suits between private parties. Finally, Judge Sotomayor argued that Congress did not intend the ADEA to apply to the selection or dismissal of clergy by a religious body.

US In Dispute Over Discovery In Suit Against Hollywood, Florida

This week brought interesting skirmishing in a federal lawsuit against the city of Hollywood, Florida, accusing it of religious discrimination in its refusal to permit an Orthodox Jewish Chabad group to hold religious services in a house in a neighborhood zoned as residential. (See prior posting.) Yesterday’s South Florida Sun-Sentinel detailed the legal maneuvering. The Justice Department asked the court to impose sanctions on the city for its belated production of police memos describing police surveillance of the home of Rosa Lopez. Lopez claims the Virgin Mary appears at her Hollywood home on the 13th of each month. Approximately 100 people show up each month to pray and seek miracles, and the city has never tried to prevent that under its zoning laws. The government is pointing to this discrepancy in making its discrimination claim. The city argues that Lopez’s home is not a house of worship and does not need a special zoning exception.

Justice Department attorney Sean Keveney argued that had the federal government known police were watching Lopez, it would have done its own surveillance to possibly "rebut any testimony offered by the city." Keveney also said the city has provided incomplete information on why it contends Lopez’s home is not a house of worship.

Hindus Split On How Textbooks Should Portray Them

Today’s San Jose Mercury News reports that in California, efforts by the state Board of Education to more accurately portray Hinduism in school textbooks are meeting new complications. (See prior postings 1, 2 .) Initially, a number of changes were proposed by two Hindu groups, the Vedic Foundation and the Hindu Education Foundation. Their proposals would change the depiction of women, low-caste Indians (dalits) and the diversity of spiritual beliefs to create what these groups argue is a more accurate and balanced portrayal of Hinduism. However, other Hindus now argue that these changes are an attempt to whitewash history and promote a Hindu nationalist agenda.

In September the state's Curriculum Commission hired Indian historian Shiva Bajpai, who had been recommended by the foundations, to review the proposals. He endorsed most of the revisions. But just before a November meeting to approve them, 50 other leading professors wrote the board urging it to reject the changes. Over the winter, hundreds of other scholars from the nation's leading research universities also wrote to protest the changes.

In the midst of this, Indian dalits ("untouchable class") in the United States became more vocal. They are demanding that the term “dalit” not be omitted from textbooks, as the Hindu groups want. The dalits also have asked that a photo of a dalit cleaning a latrine be replaced with one of a dalit engaged in a faith practice. They say that it would serve the dalits' cause better if the textbooks said that "untouchability is a living reality in India," instead of accepting the Foundations’ suggestion that to have textbooks read that it is illegal to treat someone as an untouchable. (India West report.)

Dismayed by all of this, the board of education has created a new review committee, held a private meeting and solicited the opinions of non-Hindus. In response, the Hindu American Foundation is considering legal action.

9th Circuit Hears Argument In Library Use Case

The Mercury News reports that yesterday, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. Glover (LEXIS link to trial court decision). The case involves a challenge by a Christian group that was prohibited from using a library meeting room for prayer services. The group argues that the library’s policy of excluding religious services and activities is discriminatory and violates the its free speech rights. Kelly Flanagan, attorney for Contra Costa County, argued that religious groups have free access to public library facilities, but allowing prayer services would mean taxpayers would be subsidizing religion.

On-Premise Aid For Disabled Student At Parochial School Upheld

In a recently-published decision, Bay Shore Union Free School District v. T, 405 F. Supp. 2d 230 (EDNY, Dec. 21, 2005), a New York federal district court held that New York’s education law requires the state to furnish a one-on-one aide at the parochial school of a student diagnosed with ADHD. The court held that neither the religious liberty guarantee nor the prohibition on using state funds to aid religious denominations found in the New York Constitution bar providing special educational services to a disabled student on the premises of a parochial school. No party claimed that such aid would violate the U.S. Constitution’s Establishment Clause. The court also observed that substantial free exercise concerns would be raised if New York’s education law were interpreted in a manner that required handicapped students to choose between receiving needed services and attending the private school of their choice.

Grotto Historical Marker OK'd By Kentucky AG's Office

In Louisville, Kentucky, the wording on a historical marker at the Grotto and Garden of Our Lady of Lourdes apparently will stay as it is. The marker, put up by the Kentucky Historical Society, says the local grotto is modeled on the natural grotto at Lourdes, in southwest France, "where Virgin Mary appeared to Bernadette Soubirous in 1858." After someone questioned the constitutionality of that language, state Rep. Jim Wayne (on behalf of the St. Joseph Area Association) asked the state attorney general's office for a ruling. (Background report.) A response from the attorney general's office concluded there was no establishment clause problem with the wording. A letter from Robert S. Jones, executive director of the Attorney General's office of civil and environmental law said: "Plainly, this marker does not convey a message of governmental endorsement of religion." Today's Louisville Courrier-Journal reports on these developments.

New Hampshire Supreme Court Upholds Bishop's Right To Sell Church Property

In Berthiaume v. McCormack (Feb. 14, 2006), the New Hampshire Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a suit brought by members of a Nashua, New Hampshire Catholic parish against the Roman Catholic Bishop of Manchester challenging the proposed sale of St. Francis Xavier church. the court held that, consistent with the First Amendment, it could resolve church property disputes using neutral principles of law. It said it would first consider secular documents such as trusts, deeds, and statutes, and only if those documents left it unclear which party should prevail would it consider religious documents, such as church constitutions and by-laws. It went on to hold that while New Hampshire statues require that parish property must be held for the use and benefit of the parish and its parishioners, the church property at issue does not belong to the parish, but is property held by the Bishop.

Debate On Invocation Gets Ugly In Georgia City Council

Yesterday's Morgan County Citizen reported that the debate over legislative prayer has gotten ugly in Madison, Georgia. On Monday, just before calling City Council meeting to order, Mayor Tom DuPree asked Rev. Hoke Smith of Calvary Baptist Church to deliver an invocation. Immediately after the prayer, council member Michael Naples challenged the mayor's right to ask someone to deliver an opening prayer without prior approval by Council. He moved that the mayor stop the practice, or else that the mayor move the prayer outside the meeting building. That motion died for lack of a second. Naples immediately proposed a new motion to require that the mayor bear all litigation costs resulting from challenges to prayer at Council meetings. "I'll second that motion," said council member Barry Lurey. The motion eventually passed 3-2.

Later at the end of the meeting, the agenda called for public comment. At that time, Rev. Smith who was distressed over criticism of his opening prayer stood up to describe his reaction: "I thought I'd died and gone to hell, and the devil said, 'You're not going to pray down here'. Then I looked over to the side and I saw Barry Lurey, a Jew, down here in Hell. Looked and I seen a Catholic down here, and I had to shake myself."

US Palestinians Want Secular Palestinian State; Israeli Arab Parties Push Caliphate

Today's issue of The Forward says that Palestinian-American leaders will warn Hamas against turning the West Bank and Gaza into an Islamic theocracy. The Americans say that they will push for laws favoring American-style church-state separation, pluralism, equality and inclusiveness. Ziad Asali, president of the American Task Force on Palestine, at recent Washington press conference introduced a new document, A Vision for the State of Palestine. The document, prepared before the recent PA election when it was still expected that the secularist Fatah movement would control the new parliament, sets out the suggested core values and principles on which a future Palestinian state should be founded.

Meanwhile, in Israel, according to Ynetnews, three right-wing parties yesterday asked the Central Elections Committee to disqualify the United Arab List-Ta'al party from running in the upcoming Israeli elections. Arab list chairman Sheikh Ibrahim Sarsur, in a press conference Wednesday, said that the rule on earth, or at least the rule in Arab and Muslim lands should be led by the Caliph. National Union-NRP Knesset Member Yitzhak Levy wrote to Judge Dorit Beinish, head of the the Elections Committee, saying that Sarsur's remarks called for Islamic rule in the state of Israel.

No New Trial For Defendant Told To Hide Cross He Was Wearing

In State v. Byrd, (Feb. 14, 2006), the Minnesota Court of Appeals rejected Carnell Byrd's claim that he is entitled to a new trial on robbery and gun possession charges. At his trial, Byrd appeared wearing a cross. The trial judge told him that he could decide whether the cross would remain visible or be concealed under his shirt and that, if he chose to leave it visible, he was entitled to a hearing on the matter. Byrd, without speaking, placed the cross under his shirt and did not refer to it again. The appellate court held that since Byrd was not ordered, but instead chose, to wear his cross inside his shirt, his rights were not infringed. The court added, even if he had been ordered to conceal the cross it would not entitle him to a new trial.

St. Louis Inmate's Free Exercise Claim Moves Ahead

In Chapman v. Stubblefield, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5522 (ED Mo., Feb. 13, 2006), a Magistrate Judge in Missouri federal district court ordered St. Louis Justice Center officials to respond to inmates' charges that their free exercise of religion is infringed by the jail's policy of allowing only five prisoners at a time to attend worship services.

Teachers May Sue School To Lead Good News Club

In Moab, Utah, two teachers at Helen M. Knight Intermediate School claim that their free exercise rights are being infringed because the Grand County School District refuses to permit them to lead after-school meetings of the Christian outreach Good News Club for students. Today's Salt Lake Tribune reports on the dispute. School officials say allowing the teachers to lead the Club would violate constitutional separation of church and state because teachers are still on school time under their contracts for the first 15 minutes of the club meeting, and leaders of all after-school clubs receive a $15 stipend per meeting that comes partly from public monies. The teachers have offered to forego the stipend, but the school says that is insufficient. It suggests that club meetings be held at another location or that it pay a small fee to rent space at the school. Alternatively, a non-school employee could lead the Club.

Teachers Konnie Pacheco and Paula Radcliffe are consulting with the American Center for Law and Justice about filing suit. School board president Kaaron Jorgen said she worries that representatives for the teachers hope to "use Grand County as a test case" for forcing public schools to allow teachers to teach religion. "It seems it's not about what's good for the kids; it's about adults trying to further their own agenda," she said.

Establishment Clause Challenge To Funding Faith-Based Prison Program Upheld

In Moeller v. Bradford County, (MD Pa., Feb. 10, 2006), a Pennsylvania federal district court refused to dismiss taxpayers' Establishment Clause challenge to federal, state and local government funding given to Firm Foundation to operate the only vocational training program available in the Bradford County, Pennsylvania jail. The Firm Foundation, a Christian prison ministry, routinely proselytizes inmates in the vocational training program, and does not make an effort to segregate government funds for the purely secular purpose of vocational training. The court found that participation in the program was sufficiently coercive to constitute an Establishment Clause violation and rejected Firm Foundation's argument that it could not be a state actor covered by the Establishment Clause. The court also upheld plaintiffs' standing as taxpayers to challenge the use of federal funds for the program.

Italian Court Rules Crucifixes To Remain In Schools

ANSA reported yesterday that the Council of State, Italy's highest administrative court, has ruled that crucifixes should remain in Italy's school classrooms as a symbol of Italian values. The issue arose in a case brought by a Finnish woman who asked that crucifixes be removed from the Padua school attended by her children. The court's 19-page opinion said that the crucifix is not just a religious symbol, it is also a symbol of "the values which underlie and inspire our constitution, our way of living together peacefully". The judges said principles such as tolerance, respect and the rights of individuals, now part of Italy's secular state, had their origins in Christianity. "In this sense the crucifix can have a highly educational symbolic function, regardless of the religion of the pupils," they added . Judges also argued that the concept of the secular state is interpreted and applied in different ways according to a country's history .

Justice Ginsburg's Relation To Her Judaism Explored

The February issue of Moment magazine carries a fascinating article on Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's ambivalent relationship with her Jewish religious heritage. The article is written by Abigail Pogrebin, adapted from her book Stars of David. The article reflects Ginsburg's alienation from organized Jewish religious institutions, but her strong devotion to Jewish ethical values and her sensitivity to her Jewish identity.

On the walls of Ginsburg's chambers are framed calligraphies of the command from Deuteronomy (in Hebrew), Zedek, Zedek, tirdof ("Justice, justice shalt thou pursue"). Ginsburg points out that she has a mezuzah on the door of her office, and does not place a Christmas wreath there when other doors in the Court are decorated for Christmas. She, along with Justice Breyer, convinced their colleagues to change Court policy so that the Court would not sit on the first Monday in October when that day coincides with Yom Kippur. Asked how being Jewish affects her approach to court cases, Ginsburg replied, "I don't think that I approach cases in a particular way because I am Jewish any more than I do because I' a woman. I have certain sensitivities for both." (The opening paragraphs of the article are available online.)

Congress Urges Proclamation On American Jewish History Month

Both the U.S. House and Senate have passed H. Con. Res. 315, encouraging the President to issue a proclamation for the observance of an American Jewish History Month.