Michigan Court Dismisses Challenge To Islamic Association Election

In Syed v. Islamic Association of Michigan, (MI Ct. App., Feb. 1, 2007), a Michigan state court of appeals dismissed a challenge by a member of an Islamic religious-charitable-educational organization to the procedures used to replace the organization's trustees who had resigned. Relying on the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine, the court held that it lacked jurisdiction because determining whether the election process was improper would also require determining whether the organization violated it own policies and procedures. the trial court had ruled in favor of the defendants on different grounds.

Foreigners Arrested By Saudi Religious Police For Partying Are Convicted

Both the Guardian and the Associated Press yesterday report that a Saudi Arabian judge has sentenced 20 foreigners to several months in prison and to lashes for arranging, attending and videoing a party where they drank alcohol and where men and women danced together. They were among 433 foreigners -- over half women-- who were arrested by Saudi religious police for arranging an "impudent" party held in Jiddah . Since May, the power of the religious police has been limited to arresting suspects. Previously they sometimes had held people incommunicado and took part in ensuing investigations.

Many New Scholarly Articles Of Interest Appear

From SSRN:

Kenneth C. Halcom, Taxing God, (Jan. 30, 2007).

Lee J. Strang, The (Re)Turn to History in Religion Clause Law and Scholarship, (Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 5, p. 1697, 2006).

Gerard V. Bradley, The Blaine Amendment of 1876: Harbinger of Secularism, (Jan. 30, 2007).

Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr., If Judges Were Angels: Religious Equality, Free Exercise, and the (Underappreciated) Merits of Smith, (January 2007, Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2007-06).

Assaf Likhovski, The Time Has Not Yet Come to Repair the World in the Kingdom of God: Israeli Lawyers and the Failed Jewish Legal Revolution of 1948, (October 2006).

Lyman Johnson, Faith and Faithfulness in Corporate Theory, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 56, 2007 ).

From SmartCILP:

Tom Boellstorff, Domesticating Islam: Sexuality, Gender, and the Limits of Pluralism. (Reviewing John R. Bowen, Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning; and Michael G. Peletz, Islamic Modern: Religious Courts and Cultural Politics in Malaysia) 31 Law & Social Inquiry 1035-1053 (2006).

Jason C.T. Chuah, Islamic Principles Governing International Trade Financing Instruments: A Study of the Morabaha in English Law, 27 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 137-170 (2006).

Heather Cook, Service Before Self? Evangelicals Flying High at the U.S. Air Force Academy, 36 Journal of Law & Education 1-32 (2007).

Chet K.W. Pager, The Establishment of Evolution: Public Courts and Public Classrooms, 81 Tulane Law Review 17-65 (2006).

Andrew White, Breathing New Life Into the Contemporary Islamic Waqf: What Reforms Can Figh Regarding Awqaf Adopt From the Common Law of Trusts Without Violating Shari-ah?, 41 Real Property Probate and Trust Journal 497-527 (2006).

Symposium: La Conception Americaine de la Laicite, University of Paris II (Pantheon-Assas)--Paris, France, January 28, 2005. Articles by Daniel O. Conkle, Christopher L. Eisgruber, Frederick Mark Gedicks, Carol J. Greenhouse, Douglas Laycock, Michael J. Perry and Elisabeth Zoller, 13 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 417-594 (2006).

Egyptian Government Opposes Muslim Brotherhood

Front Page Magazine today carries a long story on the growing tensions between the Egyptian government and the Muslim Brotherhood. The growing political challenge by the group is seen by President Mubarak's government as a threat to Egypt's security. Egypt's religious establishment is upset with the group because its demonstrations have made it appear that Al-Azhar University is exporting terrorism. Muslim Brotherhood leaders say the group will create a civil political party with an Islamic source of authority. (See prior related posting.)

Bill Would Add "Under God" To Texas Flag Pledge

Probably few people know that the state of Texas has a formal Pledge of Allegiance to the state flag of Texas. Texas Government Code, Sec. 3100.101 provides that it is: "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one and indivisible." Last week, Texas state Representative Debbie Riddle introduced HB 1034 into the Texas Legislature to add a reference to God in the pledge. If enacted, the new pledge would be: "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God and indivisible." WFFA-TV yesterday, reporting on the bill, quoted Rep. Riddle: "Our nation and our state was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics, Judeo-Christian values and I think it's a good thing to recognize that."

New Jersey Muslim Corrections Officer Claims Religious Discrimination

In Passiac County, New Jersey, Tamir Kozrosh, a Muslim provisional corrections officer says that he was fired by the sheriff's office for complaining about ongoing religious harassment. The Passiac County Herald News reports that Kozrosh says he was continually passed over for promotion. He claims he was reprimanded for refusing to work overtime during Ramadan, was yelled at for requesting that his food not be cooked on a grill covered with pork and was subjected to constant Muslim jokes, such as the posting of a doctored poster of his face superimposed on a poster of Osama bin Laden. A sheriff's office spokesman said that Kozrosh participated in making some of the doctored posters. The sheriff's department says he was fired primarily because he refused to cooperate in an internal affairs investigation of a complaint from a woman about an anonymous sexually explicit phone call from someone using a nickname said to have been used by Kozrosh.

Germany's Merkel Will Not Wear Head Scarf In Saudi Arabia

The UPI reported Friday that German Chancellor Angela Merkel who is beginning a tour of four Arab countries-- including Saudi Arabia-- has plans to appear there in public without wearing a headscarf . Saudi law says that women may only appear in public if they wear a headscarf and a long black garment. However the requirement is no longer enforced against foreign visitors. Merkel will follow the precedent set by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice who appeared in Riyadh wearing a pants suit and without her hair covered.

City Says Prohibition On Animal Sacrifice Is Not "Land Use" Law

In Euless, Texas, the city has moved to dismiss a RLUIPA suit brought against it by a Santeria priest who who was refused a permit to sacrifice animals at his home in a religious ceremony. (See prior posting.) The city ordinance permits the slaughter of chickens so long as they are used for food. But it would not permit the slaughtering of goats that Santeria priest, Jose Merced, and his followers were preparing to do. According to yesterday's Dallas Morning News, the city claims that its law prohibiting the slaughtering of animals anywhere in the city is a health and safety law, not a "land use" regulation covered by RLUIPA. RLUIPA, Sec. 8(5), defines a "land use regulation" as "a zoning or landmarking law, or the application of such a law, that limits or restricts a claimant's use or development of land (including a structure affixed to land)".

Settlement Will Allow Religious Charities In Florida State Employee Campaign

The Alliance Defense Fund announced on Friday that a settlement has been reached in Association of Faith-Based Organizations v. Lewis, a case in which faith-based charities were seeking the right to participate in the Florida State Employees’ Charitable Campaign. (See prior posting.) Under the agreement, Florida officials have adopted new regulations that allow religious charities to be included in the voluntary payroll deduction program, even when those charities use religious criteria in their hiring of staff members.

Vietnam Issues Religious Policy White Paper

Voice of America reported on Friday that Vietnam has released its first government white paper on religious policy. The report reflects the Hanoi government's new more friendly approach to religion. Nguyen The Doanh, the vice chairman of the Government Committee on Religious Affairs, says that the government is making it easier for new religions to be recognized. However, despite new national policies, some provincial authorities still ban certain religious practices and interfere with Protestant leaders.

Proposal To Reinforce French Secularism

In France, the High Council on Integration is recommending a new charter to further define separation of church and state in the activities of government employees and in the provision of government services. The National Secular Society reports today that the need for new charter was emphasized by recent incidents in which male doctors in hospital maternity wards are subject to insults and physical attacks by Muslim husbands who object to doctors’ touching their wives in the course of medical examination or treatment. The new charter on secularism would be distributed at public events, including ceremonies at which immigrants are granted French citizenship.

6th Circuit: First Amendment Protects Expletive Using "God"

In Leonard v. Robinson, (6th Cir., Feb. 2, 2007), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant and sent back for trial a civil rights claim growing out of an arrest of a local resident Thomas Leonard who got into a heated argument at a Montrose (MI) Township Board meeting. In a 2-1 decision, the majority held that “no reasonable officer would have found probable cause to arrest Leonard solely for uttering “God damn” while addressing the township board because the First Amendment protects this sort of uninhibited debate”. In the course of its opinion, the majority held unconstitutional Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.103 that makes it a misdemeanor for “Any person who has arrived at the age of discretion … [to] profanely curse or damn or swear by the name of God, Jesus Christ or the Holy Ghost….” The majority said that the section “if not facially invalid, is radically limited by the First Amendment”. The majority also found constitutional problems with the potential application of three other Michigan statutes to Leonard’s speech.

Judge Sutton, dissenting in part, said: “While I am prepared to accept the majority’s judgment that the application of all four statutes to Leonard violated his First Amendment rights, I am not prepared to accept its judgment that the Supreme Court, our court or the Michigan courts had clearly established the unconstitutionality of all four of these duly enacted laws before this incident.” The Associated Press today reported on the decision. [Thanks to How Appealing for the lead.]

British Jewish Community Divided On Gay Adoption Rules

In Britain, organizations in the Jewish community differ somewhat in the extent of their support for the Catholic Church’s strong opposition to new Sexual Orientation Regulations that will require religiously sponsored social service agencies treat gay and lesbian couples equally with heterosexual couples in placing children for adoption. (See prior posting.) On Thursday, TotallyJewish.com reported that Britain’s Federation of Synagogues called for strong support of the positions of the Catholic Church and the Church of England in opposition to the new requirements. However the Jewish Community’s leading adoption agency says it does not discriminate against any group or part of the community. Meanwhile, Britain’s Chief Rabbi, Sir Jonathan Sacks, has issued an ambiguous press release, saying that Jewish law is committed to marriage and family, but at the same time the Jewish community is committed to compassion and sensitivity. The Board of Deputies of British Jews also issued an ambivalent statement.

Religious Discrimination Claim Filed Against California Athletic Club

In Hollister, California earlier this week, a family has filed a religious discrimination lawsuit seeking $4000 in damages against a local athletic club. The Hollister Free Lance reported on Thursday that Andrew and Christine Martinez have sued because Rovella’s Athletic Club refused to permit their son to participate in its competitive swim program after the Martinez’ crossed out several religious references in the club’s handbook before they signed an acceptance of it. The Martinez family is Catholic, but does not feel that a swim club is the proper place for their son to be exposed to religion.

Recent Prisoner Religious Freedom Cases

In Smithback v. Texas, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6033 (ND TX, Jan. 29, 2007), a Texas inmate brought a religious freedom challenge to a rule of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice that prohibited prisoners from placing extraneous drawings or illustrations on envelopes they mail out from prison. Plaintiff claims that prison authorities refused to let him send a letter to his family in an envelope containing a handwritten drawing of a large cross surrounded by the words "Jesus" and "LORD!" A federal Magistrate Judge held that this restriction did not substantially burden plaintiff’s free exercise of religion, and that prison authorities had a legitimate penological interest in imposing the restriction.

In Heleva v. Kramer, (3d Cir., Jan. 27, 2007), the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a Pennsylvania district court’s dismissal of a prisoner’s free exercise of religion claim. The Court of Appeals held that the lower court erred in finding that books sent to him by his sister were not "religious". The lower court’s distinction between religious books and spiritual, self-help books was found to be untenable. Also the court held that the fact the prisoner’s claim is based on the deprivation of personal property—refusal to give him the books sent to him—does not prevent him from asserting a free exercise claim.

In Kay v. Friel, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6391 (D UT, Jan. 26, 2007), and in the related case of Kay v. Bemis, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6392 (D UT, Jan 25, 2007), a Utah federal district court rejected a Wiccan prisoner’ free exercise, establishment clause and RLUIPA claims growing out of allegations that officials at two different prisons variously prevented him from possessing items needed for religious practices, including tarot cards, a Dungeons and Dragons game, and a metal religious symbol, and prevented him from purchasing incense and certain books. The court held that plaintiff’s complaint contains no allegations of facts showing that the items he desires are necessary to the practice of the Wicca religion, nor does it describe the nature of the religious ritual he was prevented from conducting, nor—in the Bemis case-- does he make clear his religious affiliation. The state had a reasonable explanation for the lack of Wiccan religious services. Finally, the relief he sought under RLUIPA is unavailable to him.

In Young v. Beard, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6950 (ED PA, Jan. 31, 2007), a Pennsylvania federal district judge, after a non-jury trial, rejected a prisoner’s claim that prison policy permitting religious musical bands—and permitting them to rehearse more frequently than secular bands—violates the establishment clause and equal protection clause.

In Nelson v. Miller, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6580 (SD IL, Jan. 30, 2007), an Illinois federal Magistrate Judge dismissed various claims by a Catholic prisoner that prison authorities failed to furnish him a diet that complies with his religious beliefs. The court found that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to one free exercise claim. His claim relating to denial of a vegan diet are moot because he is now receiving such a diet, and there is no reasonable expectation that it will be withdrawn. The court found that the 11th Amendment barred plaintiff’s damage claim under RLUIPA against defendant in his official capacity.

In Thompson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95008 (MD PA, filed Feb. 1, 2007), a Pennsylvania federal district court adopted recommendations of a federal magistrate judge rejecting claims of a Rastafarian prisoner who had been refused an exemption from a prison’s hair-length requirements. Officials found that his religious beliefs were not sincere. The court found that two of the defendants had in fact supported plaintiff’s claim for an exemption, so no cause of action lies against them.

NFL Says Church Super Bowl Parties Violate Copyright Laws

Yesterday's Indianapolis Star reports that the NFL is telling churches-- even through demand letters sent by overnight express-- that they will be violating the copyright laws if they host Super Bowl parties on large-screen TV's. NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said: "We have contracts with our (TV) networks to provide free over-the-air television for people at home. The network economics are based on television ratings and at-home viewing. Out-of-home viewing is not measured by Nielsen." The only exception is for sports bars and other businesses that show televised sports as a part of their everyday operations. The NFL also objected to plans by Fall Creek Baptist Church in Indianapolis to show a video at their Super Bowl party of the Christian testimonies of Colts coach Tony Dungy and Chicago Bears coach Lovie Smith. The NFL says that for groups other than businesses that regularly show televised sports events, gatherings are limited to use of one TV set no larger than 55 inches, no admission fees may be charged (even to pay for refreshments), no "message" may be promoted in connection with the game, and "Super Bowl" may not be used in the publicity. Christianity Today's Weblog has more on this story.

UPDATE: Compliments of a posting on Religionlaw by Marty Lederman, here are the copyright law sections involved. 17 USC 106(5) gives the copyright owner the "exclusive right" to "publicly display" an audiovisual work. However there is an exemption in 17 USC 110(5)(B) for displays that comply with certain limitations.

Senate Chaplain Cancels Out After Finding Conference's Political Slant

The Associated Press reports today that U.S. Senate Chaplain Barry Black has cancelled a speech he was scheduled to give at next month's Reclaiming America for Christ Conference after conference promoters put his photo-- along with those of prominent conservatives-- on a brochure promoting the event. Black told Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that he was concerned that his appearance would violate the Senate chaplain's "historic tradition of being nonpolitical, nonpartisan, nonsectarian". Black is the first military chaplain, the first African-American and the first Seventh-day Adventist to hold the post of Senate Chaplain. When Black agreed to appear at the Reclaiming America for Christ Conference, he was not aware of the conservative slant of the event or who the other speakers would be. [Thanks to Blog from the Capital for the link, and to Steven Sholk for a heads up on the story.]

President Speaks At National Prayer Breakfast

Yesterday President Bush spoke at the 55th National Prayer Breakfast held at the Hilton Washington Hotel. In his remarks (full text) he said: "Prayer changes hearts. Prayer changes lives. And prayer makes us a more compassionate and giving people. When we pray we surrender our will to the Almighty, and open ourselves up to His priorities and His touch. His call to love our neighbors as we would like to be loved ourselves is something that we hear when we pray. And we answer that call by reaching out to feed the hungry and clothe the poor and aid the widow and the orphan."

This year's breakfast attracted 3600 guests from 170 nations and all 50 states and U.S. territories. The keynote speaker was Dr. Frances Collins, Director of the Human Genome Project. Among the other speakers was U.S. Congressman Mike McIntyre (D-NC) who hosted a spiritual heritage tour of the U.S. Capitol the night before the breakfast. (Topsail-Island.info).

Preliminary Injunction Granted To Student Anti-Abortion Protester

In M.A.L. v. Kinsland, (ED MI, Jan. 31, 2007), a Michigan federal district court granted a preliminary injunction against school officials to an 8th-grade student who was prevented from expressing his anti-abortion views at school last October to mark "Pro-Life Day of Silent Solidarity"-- an event sponsored by a Christian youth organization. (See prior posting.) The parties subsequently agreed that the student could wear red tape on his wrists and a sweat shirt containing a protest slogan. However they remained at odds on the school's literature distribution policy. The court found it likely that the plaintiff would succeed on the merits of his claim that the school's literature distribution policy is an unconstitutional violation of his First Amendment rights. A release by Alliance Defense Fund discusses the case as does an article in the Monroe (MI) News.

British Humanist Offical Urges End To Bishops' Seats In House of Lords

Ekklesia yesterday reported that in connection with discussions by the British government about House of Lords reform, Hanne Stinson, chief executive of the British Humanist Association, has urged that the practice of automatically setting aside 26 seats for bishops of the Church of England be ended. The House of Lords has a total of 746 members. In the past there have been suggestions about expanding representation to other religious groups, but Congregationalists, Quakers and others have objected to "religious representation" on principle. Stinson has urged that all appointment of Lords be solely on merit.