VA Supreme Court Upholds Inmate's Religious Name Change Request

In Stephens v. Commonwealth, (VA Sup. Ct., June 8, 2007), the Virginia Supreme Court held that the lower court had abused its discretion when it refused to permit a Muslim prisoner to change his name for religious reasons. The circuit court had refused the request because the name did not appear to have a religious meaning.

Drafting Committee Says Thai Monks Seeking Official Religion Should End Fast

Thailand's Constitution Drafting Committee on Saturday called on Buddhist monks to end the protest fast they are staging outside Parliament House. The monks want Buddhism to become the country's official religion under its new constitution. The Nation reports that CDC chairman Prasong Soonsiri said the demand is unjustified and the tactic of fasting in protest is contrary to the Buddhist principle of moderation. (See prior related posting.)

Recent Articles Of Interest

From SSRN:
Chaim Saiman, Jesus' Legal Theory-A Rabbinic Interpretation, (June 2007, Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2007-12).

Jude Chua, What is a “Professional”? Ethics and Religion in the Sciences of the Artificial, (May 31, 2007).

Lloyd H.Mayer, Grasping Smoke: Enforcing the Ban on Political Activity By Charities, (First Amendment Law Review, Vol. 6, 2007).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:
The Winter 2007 issue of Montana Law Review carries three articles on "Intelligent Design": David K. DeWolf, John G. West & Casey Luskin, Intelligent Design Will Survive; Peter Irons, Disaster in Dover; David K. DeWolf, John G. West & Casey Luskin, Rebuttal to Irons. (The articles are discussed at Dispatches from the Culture Wars blog.)

L. Scott Smith, From Promised Land to Tower of Babel: Religious Pluralism and the Future of the Liberal Experiment in America, 45 Brandeis Law Journal 527-572 (2007).

Cert. Petition Filed In 9th Circuit Case on Use of Library Meeting Room

On Thursday, Alliance Defense Fund filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. Glover. (ADF press release.) The case involves the question of whether a Contra Costa County, California public library can make its meeting rooms available for "meetings, programs, or activities of educational, cultural or community interest", while excluding their use for "religious services". Last September, by a vote of 2-1 (with 3 different opinions being written), the 9th Circuit said that the library could exclude religious worship.

PBS Church-State Documentary Questioned

PBS has announced that some of its stations will be showing a new documentary this month titled "Wall of Separation". A PBS press release says the show will explore the founding fathers' understanding of the role of religion in state and federal government, which, it says, was "radically different" than today's interpretation. On Friday, Americans United for Separation of Church and State issued a release questioning the objectivity of the documentary. While AU has not been able to obtain a copy to preview, AU says that based on the individuals connected with its filming, "it may be an intentionally warped and inaccurate view of the role of religion in our nation’s founding".

Rabbi's Contract and ADA Claims Dismissed On 1st Amendment Grounds

In Leavy v. Congregation Beth Shalom, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41658 (ND IA, May 24, 2007), an Iowa federal district court dismissed disability discrimination and breach of contract claims brought by Rabbi Bonnie Leavy against her former congregation. The court held that adjudicating her complaint regarding her dismissal as rabbi would entangle the court excessively in internal affairs of the synagogue and the manner in which it chooses its religious leader, in violation of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.

US President Meets Pope In Rome

The Associated Press today reports on President Bush’s stop in Italy after attending the G8 meetings in Germany. Asked at a news conference (full text) in Rome about his meeting with Pope Benedict XVI, here is part of what the President said:

I'll be glad to share some of the private conversation with His Holy Father. First, I'll give you an impression. I was talking to a very smart, loving man…. I was in awe, and it was a moving experience for me.

… He did express deep concern about the Christians inside Iraq, that he was concerned that the society that was evolving would not tolerate the Christian religion. And I assured him we're working hard to make sure that people lived up to the constitution, the modern constitution voted on by the people that would honor people from different walks of life and different attitudes.

… We talked about our attempts to help the people on Africa deal with HIV/AIDS and malaria and hunger. I reminded him that we made a significant commitment to that end…

And I talked to him about our attempts to feed the hungry, and I also reminded him that we've got poor people in our own neighborhood that need to be affected. He talked about immigration. He's watching the immigration debate very closely in America. And I told him I was a person who strongly supports comprehensive immigration reform; that, on the one hand, we'll enforce our law, on the other hand, we need to treat people with dignity. And we had a good discussion.…

Q The Pope has said Iraq was worrisome.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yes, he's worrisome [sic] about the Christians inside Iraq being mistreated by the Muslim majority. He's deeply concerned about that, and we spent a lot -- spent a fair amount of time talking about it.

While in Rome, Bush also met at the U.S. Embassy with members of the Sant Egido Community, a lay Roman Catholic organization that operates an AIDS program in ten African countries. The program is partly funded by the U.S. Listening to the group’s concerns, Bush said that he would look into making it easier for faith based groups to access US aid funds directly, instead of through foreign governments.

Congress Hears Varied Religious Views On Attacking Global Warming

Last Thursday, the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works held hearings on An Examination of the Views of Religious Organizations Regarding Global Warming. The full text of statements presented by seven different witnesses, and written testimony from seven others are available online. While some of the witnesses supported Congressional action on global warming in religious terms, others took a decidedly different position. For example, the testimony of Dr. Russell Moore Dean of the School of Theology Southern Baptist Theological Seminary set out a broad case from the conservative evangelical perspective questioning current moves to deal with global warming and support for them by the religious community. [Thanks to Melissa Rogers for the lead.]

Egyptian Court Upholds Right To Wear Niqab On Campus

The International Herald Tribune reported on Saturday that in Egypt, the Circuit of Unification of Principles, an 11-judge committee of the Supreme Administrative Court, has said that American University in Cairo should not be able to totally ban Muslim women from wearing the full face veil on campus. However, the committee said that women could be required to remove their veil for female security guards to verify their identities before entering campus. The decision by the court committee now goes to the full Supreme Administrative Court for a final ruling. Last November, a lower court ruled in favor of Muslim women challenging the niqab ban. (See prior posting.)

Canadian AG Concerned That Polygamy Charges Will Raise Religious Freedom Issues

This past week in the Canadian province of British Columbia, Attorney-General Wally Oppal appointed a special prosecutor to review whether polygamy charges should be brought against members of the polygamous community in the town of Bountiful. The Province reported on Thursday that the AG is proceeding carefully, partly out of a concern that prosecutions might infringe the group's religious rights.

Free Exercise Challenge To Restriction On Feeding Needy Rejected

In Knauss v. City of Phoenix, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41359 (D AZ, June 6, 2007), an individual who was a volunteer and contributor to several church programs to assist the needy challenged a zoning ordinance that precluded a church from serving food to the needy in an unscreened outdoor area in downtown Phoenix. An Arizona federal district court found that plaintiff lacked standing to bring many of his challenges. It found he did have standing to challenge the restriction on free exercise of religion grounds, but rejected that claim on the merits. While the ordinance prevented plaintiff from extending charity as required by his religious beliefs, the restriction was a neutral law of general applicability. The city met the rational basis standard necessary to uphold such an ordinance.

West Virginia Justice Reveals Religious Attacks Against Him In Campaign

Today's Charleston Daily Mail reports that West Virginia State Supreme Court Justice Brent Benjamin spoke publicly last month for the first time about his hard-fought and successful race in 2004 for election to the state's Supreme Court. In the race, outside parties spent millions of dollars on attack ads on both sides. Benjamin said that near the end of the campaign, his opponent's supporters began a whisper campaign questioning Benjamin's religion, saying that his last name was "not a Christian sounding name." Benjamin also pointed out that one of the ads against him charged that he wanted to take God, the Bible and religion out of all aspects of public life. A full transcript and videos of the Annenberg Public Policy Center's conference at which Benjamin spoke is available online. The conference was titled Judicial Campaigns: Money, Mudslinging and an Erosion of Public Trust.

School Will Not Appeal Religious Flier Case

The Student Press Law Center reported yesterday that the Liverpool (New York) Central School District will not file an appeal in M.B. v. Liverpool Central School District, decided last March. (See prior posting.) In the case, a federal district court held that the school district had violated a fourth-grader's First Amendment speech rights by refusing to permit her to hand out Christian religious fliers to her classmates during non-instructional times.

District Court Rejects Challenge To Suspension of Bussing To Parochial School

In Pucket v. Hot Springs School District, (D SD, June 6, 2007), a South Dakota federal district court rejected a claim by students attending Bethesda Lutheran School and their parents that the state's temporary termination of busing of students to the parochial school violated their free exercise, speech and equal protection rights and violated the establishment clause.

Plaintiffs claimed that provisions of the South Dakota constitution prohibiting aid for religious schools violated their federal constitutional rights. The court, however, concluded that "Whether the S.D. Constitution provisions are either facially discriminatory or were adopted out of religious animus does not matter because plaintiffs cannot establish a causal link between the S.D. Constitution provisions and the School District policy."

The court found that the school district's delay in reinstituting busing once state law was amended to permit it and insurance concerns were resolved was motivated by its concern over how that action would affect pending litigation. The court went on to say: "Because School District’s continued denial of busing is rationally related to a legitimate government interest, plaintiffs’ free exercise challenge fails as a matter of law. Further, even if School District’s policy was not facially neutral, the Supreme Court’s decision in Locke v. Davey,... indicates that the denial of busing is too insignificant of a burden to constitute a free exercise violation."

Today's Sioux Falls Argus Leader reports on the decision and the reaction of both sides to the decision.

Suburban Chicago Church Loses RLUIPA Challenge In 7th Circuit

In Petra Presbyterian Church v. Village of Northbrook, (7th Cir., June 7, 2007), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a RLUIPA challenge by a suburban Chicago church that was denied a zoning permit to convert a warehouse into a church. Writing for the court, Judge Posner said: "When there is plenty of land on which religious organizations can build churches (or, as is common nowadays, convert to churches buildings previously intended for some other use) in a community, the fact that they are not permitted to build everywhere does not create a substantial burden." Since there was no substantial burden on the church's free exercise of religion, it was irrelevant that the village may not have had a compelling interest in excluding membership organizations from industrial zones.

The court also rejected the claim that the church had a vested right to operate in the warehouse because the initial refusal of a permit was under a zoning ordinance that discriminated against religious institutions. Subsequently the ordinance was revised to exclude all membership organizations-- not just churches-- from industrial zones. Posner wrote: "If the 1988 ordinance violated RLUIPA, as Northbrook comes close to conceding, Petra didn't have to comply with it. But that doesn't mean that it acquired an immunity from all zoning regulation. It knew or should have known that Northbrook could redo its ordinance to comply with the "less than equal terms" provision of RLUIPA...."

Judge Refuses To Dismiss Defamation Suit Against Funeral Picketers

The Baltimore Examiner reports that on Monday, a Maryland federal district court refused to dismiss a defamation suit against the Topeka, Kansas Westboro Baptist Church, its leader Rev. Fred Phelps and his two daughters. The dismissal motion denied on Monday had been filed by the two daughters who were added as defendants. Westboro Church members-- who protest regularly at veterans' funerals carrying signs decrying the country's tolerance of homosexuality-- picketed at the funeral of Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder of Westminster, Maryland. They then used the Church's website to criticize Snyder's parents, saying they had "raised [Matthew] for the devil". Defendants argued that the lawsuit, brought by Snyder's father, should be dismissed because it would require the court or a jury to decide the correctness of opposing religious viewpoints. However, Judge Richard Bennett said: "when a civil dispute … can be decided without resolving an ecclesiastical controversy, a civil court may properly exercise jurisdiction". (See prior related postings on the case, 1, 2 .)

Muslim Correctional Officer Trainee Loses Free Exercise Claim

In Valdes v. State of New Jersey, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41038 (D NJ, June 6, 2007), a New Jersey federal district court dismissed free exercise and religious discrimination claims brought by Juan Valdes, a Muslim who was dismissed from New Jersey's Correctional Officer's Training Program for wearing a beard longer than one-eight inch. His religion prohibits him from shaving his beard. The court rejected Valdes' free exercise claim, holding that the grooming requirement was a generally applicable neutral regulation. It rejected Valdes' Title VII claim, finding that the state had offered him reasonable accommodation by permitting facial hair, limited in length, while usually it requires trainees to be clean shaven. The court also rejected Valdes' equal protection claim.

Bipartisan Bill In Congress Would Require Pharmacies To Fill Contraceptive Requests

On Wednesday, a bipartisan bill, the Access to Birth Control Act, was introduced in Congress. The legislation sponsored in the House by New York Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (press release) and in the Senate by New Jersey Sen. Frank Lautenberg (press release) would require all pharmacies to promptly fill requests for contraceptives, including over-the-counter emergency contraceptive Plan B for adults. The bill's findings decry refusals by pharmacists to fill prescriptions for contraceptives. The bill also requires pharmacies to ensure that their employees do not intimidate, threaten or harass customers seeking contraceptives, misrepresent information about contraceptives or interfere with filling requests for them. The bill provides no exception for pharmacists who have religious or moral objections to contraceptives. CNS News reports on the bill.

Summary Judgment Denied In Preachers' Challenge To LA Town Over Protest Rights

The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday refused to grant summary judgment to either side in a suit brought by several demonstrators who claim their free exercise, free speech and freedom of assembly rights were infringed when one demonstrator was arrested and others were threatened with arrest by Columbia, Louisiana police. Worldwide Street Preachers Fellowship v. Town of Columbia, (5th Cir., June 6, 2007), was a suit brought following several demonstrations by an organization of street preachers carrying signs decrying sin and calling for repentance. Some of the signs were critical of abortion, homosexuals, and women pastors, and one carried pictures of aborted fetuses. The court held that a crucial question in the case is the state's motivation in arresting and threatening arrest of the demonstrators. Disputed issues of fact require the case to go to trial to determine whether police action was content-based or content neutral.

Religion In US Politics Fascinates Writer In India

The role of religion in the 2008 U.S. presidential race seems to have an odd international fascination. In today's Calcutta, India Telegraph, writer Mukul Kesavan explores the phenomenon in an op-ed titled Run, Mr. Bloomberg. He writes in part:

I want [New York Mayor Michael] Bloomberg to campaign for president because it would be a political experiment, one that tests the proposition that a serious candidate for the American presidency needs to be a Christian. And not just a nominal Christian but an observant Christian. As an Indian interested in the role of religion and religious identity in politics, I’d like to know if a non-Christian like Mr Bloomberg (who is Jewish), can mount a credible campaign. For this proposition to be disproved, it isn't important that Bloomberg win: merely that he be taken seriously as a presidential candidate.

Being publicly Christian seems oddly important in American politics. Oddly important because the democracy Indians live in, despite its bloody record of sectarian intolerance and violence, routinely elects non-believing Hindus and non-Hindus to high political office.