Activists Force Syrian Government To Shelve Proposed Personal Status Law

The August issue of Syria Today reports that civil rights activists have gotten the government to shelve a new secretly-drafted personal status law that would have codified conservative principles of sharia law. Opponents successfully argued that the proposed law violated Syria's constitution, interfered with rulings of religious courts and reversed progress on women's and children's rights. Among the proposed provisions were the creation of a new body that could involuntarily order a couple divorced if one of them converted out of the Muslim faith. It would have allowed interfaith marriages to be registered only if the husband agrees, and would have barred those without a religious faith from marrying. It would have lowered the permissible age for marriage to 13 for girls and 15 for boys, and would allow a husband to avoid paying for his wife's education if the education interfered with her "family obligations." The draft was seen as an attempt to force moderates to accept conservative interpretations of Islamic law.

Senate Rejects Charitable Donation of "Clunkers" In Extending Program

The U.S. Senate last Thursday approved a House bill that extended the "cash of clunkers" automobile purchase incentive program by appropriating an additional $2 billion for it. The Senate considered and defeated seven amendments. Unless the Senate passed the House bill without amendment, the program would effectively have been killed since the bill would have to go back to the House which is already in recess until September. (Washington Independent.) Among the amendments defeated was one by Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn that would have permitted car dealers to donate clunker trade-ins to 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations. (Full text of defeated amendment.)

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• William A. Wooten, The Coach’s Pre-Game Prayer: Probably Wrong But Feels Right, (August 3, 2009).


• Thomas Charles Berg, Lemon v. Kurtzman: The Parochial-School Crisis and the Establishment Clause, (in Law and Religion Cases in Context, Leslie Griffin ed., Aspen Publishers, Forthcoming).


• Scott M. Noveck, The Promise and Problems of Treating Religious Freedom as Freedom of Association, (May 12, 2009).


• Carl H. Esbeck, Why the Supreme Court has Fashioned Rules of Standing Unique to the Establishment Clause, (Engage, Vol. 10, p.115, October 2009).


• Barbara P. Billauer, First Things, First - In the Creation of the Universe: A Conciliatory Translation of Genesis, (August 4, 2009).


• Leslie C. Griffin, Review Essay, (Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 25, 2009).

From SmartCILP:

• Federalist Society's Church Autonomy Conference: "The Things that are Not Caesar's: Religious Organizations as a Check on the Authoritarian Pretentions of the State." Articles by Patrick McKinley Brennan, Carl H. Esbeck, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Ira C. Lupu, Robert W. Tuttle, Thomas C. Berg, Michael P. Moreland, John H. Mansfield & Douglas Laycock. 7 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 29-278 (2009). [Video of conference presentations from Federalist Society website.]
  

Recent Prisoner Religion and Free Exercise Cases

In Sterr v. Baptista, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66039 (CD CA, July 20, 2009), a California federal district court rejected a challenge by a prisoner who practices Asatru/Odinism to the prison's decision to replace vegetation on sacred ground used by "earth-based religions" to all grass, and a change in schedule for access to classrooms and a sanctuary.

In Yaacov v. Collins, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66479 (ND OH, July 31, 2009), an Ohio federal magistrate judge upheld a former prison policy that limited kosher meals to inmates who registered as Jewish when they entered the prison.

In Sokolsky v. Voss, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67070 (ED CA, July 24, 2009), a California federal district court allowed a Jewish inmate to move ahead with his damage claim against officials (but only in their individual capacities) of a mental hospital to which he had been criminally committed. Plaintiff alleged that his rights under RLUIPA were infringed when during Passover he was furnished standard, rather than kosher-for-Passover, meals. He also claimed that he was subjected to discipline when he complained about the matter. In the lawsuit, plaintff seeks compensatory damages of $1 million and punitive damages of $4 million.

In Kaiser v. Shipman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67596 (ND FL, Aug. 4, 2009), a Florida federal magistrate judge recommended summary judgment for defendant in an inmate's challenge to prison regulations that allegedly interfered with his religious practices as an eclectic pagan. Plaintiff had claimed that denying him permission to possess tarot cards, runes, and an altar cloth or, alternatively, supervised access in the chapel at night to these items violated his rights under the 1st Amendment and RLUIPA. He also claimed equal protection violations because other inmates could possess secular items (playing cards and Scrabble tiles) and religious articles (Islamic prayer rugs) that were similar to the items he wanted.

In Aguirre v. Corrections Corporation of America, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67771 (ND OH, June 5, 2009), an Ohio federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies objections by an inmate who changed his religious preference from Catholic to Jewish that he had not been allowed to participate in the kosher meal program or Jewish holidays.

In Boles v. Bartruff, (CO Ct. App., Aug. 6, 2009), a Colorado Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision rejected a claim by a Jewish prisoner that he was denied due process at a disciplinary hearing when he was not allowed to question the complaining officer about her alleged anti-Semitism.

Christians- Muslims Disagree Over Kadhi Proposal For Kenyan Constitution

In Kenya, disagreement between majority Christians and the 10% Muslim population has broken out over a proposal to place in Kenya's new constitution provisions regarding Kadhi courts. According to yesterday's Christian Post, the proposal would go beyond confirming the existing regional Kadhi courts that adjudicate family law and inheritance matters for Muslims. The provisions would elevate the courts to a national level and extend their jurisdiction to civil and commercial matters between Muslims. However in an interview in The Nation, the secretary general of the Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims suggests that the proposal does not expand Kadhi jurisdiction.

Paper Profiles Principal Facing Contempt Charges Over Prayer

Today's Pensacola (FL) News Journal carries a fascinating lengthy profile of Frank Lay, long-time principal of Santa Rosa County (FL) Pace High School who faces criminal contempt charges for defying a temporary injunction against prayer and religious activity at his school. (See prior posting.) A large portrait of Gen Robert E. Lee hangs on the wall of Lay's office, and his credenza holds patriotic items and a Christian cross. Lay's 1800-student high school has been referred to by some over the years as "the Baptist Academy." School events featured prayers led by teachers, staff or outsiders they invited. Teachers offered Biblical interpretations, talked about their churches, gave assignments related to religion and encouraged students to attend religious clubs.

Obama Nominations for 3rd and 6th Circuits: What Do We Know of Their Views On Religion Issues?

President Barack Obama on Friday sent two nominations for vacant Court of Appeals judgeships to the Senate. (White House press release.) Nashville attorney and ERISA specialist Jane Stranch has been nominated for the 6th Circuit. Stranch has been active in the Episcopal Church, serving as a Vice-Chancellor for the Episcopal Diocese of Tennessee.

Federal district judge Thomas I. Vanaskie has been nominated for a vacancy on the 3rd Circuit. As a district judge since 1994 (chief judge since 1999) for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, he has written several opinions dealing with free exercise issues.

• The most important is Black Hawk v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, (2002), in which he held that a Native American holy man's free exercise rights were violated when Pennsylvania refused to grant him an exemption from a permit fee requirement for two black bears he kept. The bears were used by Dennis Black Hawk to perform religious ceremonies. The decision was affirmed by the 3rd Circuit, in an opinion (full text) written by now Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito who at that time was a judge on the 3rd Circuit. In 2000, Vanaskie also wrote the opinion (full text) granting a preliminary injunction in the Black Hawk case.

Other free exercise opinions written by Vanaskie are:

• Williams v. Myers, (2000), [LEXIS link], rejecting an inmate's claim that he was denied parole for refusing to attend a religious-based drug and alcohol treatment program;
• Shahin v. College Misericordia, (2006) [LEXIS link], finding that Muslim faculty member failed to show religious or national origin discrimination in Title VII case;
• Khouzam v. Hogan, (2008), holding that an Egyptian Coptic Christian should have been given an opportunity to challenge Egypt's assurance that he would not be tortured if he was returned to Egypt where he had been convicted in abstentia of murder. The decision was vacated by the 3rd Circuit (full text of opinion) which agreed with the substance of Vanaskie's findings but disagreed with the remedy he granted; and
• Smith v. Kyler, (2008), [LEXIS link], rejecting a prisoner's claim under the constitution and RLUIPA that the prison should have furnished Rastafarian prisoners a weekly group prayer service led by a prayer leader. The decision was affirmed by the 3rd Circuit (full text of opinion).

11th Circuit Remands Asylum Case For Further Findings on Religious Persecution

In Kazemzadeh v. U.S. Attorney General, (11th Cir., Aug. 6, 2009), the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision remanded for further fact finding a petition for asylum and withholding of removal filed by an Iranian man who had converted from Islam to Christianity. Judge Pryor, writing the majority opinion, said:

A denial of review will return the petitioner to the theocratic regime in Iran, but an erroneous grant of review could establish a precedent that rewards less than genuine fears of persecution based on religious conversion. ... The right course between the threats of Scylla and Charybdis is for the Board to reconsider the record, which contains important evidence that the Board failed to mention.... There is evidence that the law against apostasy is not often enforced in Iran, but neither the Board nor the Immigration Judge considered Kazemzadeh's testimony that Iranians who convert from Islam to Christianity avoid punishment by instead suffering persecution by practicing underground.

Judge Marcus concurred, but also wrote a separate opinion stressing, among other things, that "it is legal error to deny asylum on the basis of well-founded fear of religious persecution on the theory that an individual may escape discovery by abandoning his faith or hiding it and practicing his religion underground."

Judge Edenfield dissented on the religious persecution issue, arguing that having to practice religion underground to avoid punishment should not be seen as a form of persecution. He went on to conclude that the Board of Immigration Appeal acted reasonably in concluding that appellant had failed to demonstrate a pattern or practice of persecution against Christian converts in Iran. Finally he urged that on remand the Board of Immigration Appeals make a credibility determination as to the issue of the genuineness of appellant's conversion. Volokh Conspiracy discusses this latter point more fully. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Feelings Run High Over Lodi CA Prayer Policy

Passions seem to be running high over Lodi, California City Council's decision that prayers delivered at the beginning of Council meetings should be non-sectarian. Yesterday's San Jose Mercury News reports that Council postponed Wednesday's scheduled discussion of the policy to a special meeting scheduled for Sept. 30. However competing demonstrators lined the sidewalk-- one side carrying signs saying "Keep them separate" and "Lodi is not a Christian town." The larger group-- some 300-- were on the other side of the issue, chanting "Jesus" and "Amen." The rally against current policy was sponsored by the national group, The Pray In Jesus Name Project. A 13-year old demonstrator said: "It's becoming harder and harder for the Christians. ... It's only because we support God that our country is as blessed as it is." Meanwhile inside Methodist minister, Rev. Alan Kimber, delivered a non-sectarian invocation-- a moment of silence and then thanks for our country's freedom to express different beliefs. When he ended with a simple "Amen", some members in the audience yelled out: "in Jesus name." (See prior related posting.)

County Wants Return of Settlement From Church of Universal Love and Music

After last week's drug raid at the Church of Universal Love and Music (see prior posting), Fayette County, Pennsylvania has now filed a motion in federal court seeking to recover from the Church the $75,000 the county paid in a settlement of a RLUIPA zoning lawsuit against it. The motion also seeks to enjoin the Church's holding any more concerts. According to yesterday's Pittsburgh Post Gazette , the county argues that the settlement agreement was violated when the church permitted drug use at the concert it sponsored. In the case the Church claimed denial of a zoning permit amounted to religious discrimination.

UPDATE: The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reports that on Friday the court denied Fayette County's request for a temporary restraining order after church founder William Pritts agreed to not hold any events at the church over the weekend. The court set a hearing on a preliminary injunction for Thursday.

UPDATE 2: On Aug. 13, the federal district court issued a temporary injunction barring the church from holding any events that involve amplified music until a hearing on a permanent injunction is held in several months. (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 8/13).

Conservative Rabbi Sues Challenging Georgia's Kosher Food Labeling Act

Yesterday in Atlanta, Georgia, a rabbi filed a state court lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Georgia's Kosher Food Labeling Act (OCGA Sec. 26-2-330 ff.). The complaint (full text) in Lewis v. Perdue, (Super. Ct. Fulton Co., filed 8/9/2009), claims that by defining "kosher food" as "food prepared under and of products sanctioned by the orthodox Hebrew religious rules and requirements," Sec. 26-2-330 ignores the different interpretations in different streams of Judaism as to what is kosher. This, the lawsuit contends, violates the constitutional rights of Rabbi Shalom Lewis who applies Conservative Jewish standards. The suit contends that the law as currently written violates the free exercise, establishment, equal protection and due process clauses of the U.S. and Georgia constitutions. The ACLU which filed the suit on behalf of Rabbi Lewis has issued a press release on the case.

Harvard Dean, Expert on Religion and Pluralism, Nominated for LSC Board

Martha L. Minow, who earlier this year was named Dean of the Harvard Law School, has now also been nominated by President Barack Obama to be a board member of the Legal Services Corporation. One of Minow's major research interests has been religion and pluralism. A White House press release yesterday announced that she is one of 5 individuals that have been nominated to the 11-member LSC board.

Iowa Bus System Removes Atheist Ads After Complaints Received

The controversy over ads on the side of buses placed by atheist groups has now moved to Des Moines, Iowa. WHO-TV News reported Wednesday that DART, the agency which operates buses in the city, is removing ads already on buses reading: "Don't believe in God? You are not alone." Even though conservative Christian ministers in the area have no objections to DART running the ads, DART acted after receiving a number of phone calls from individuals who were offended. DART says its advertising commission never approved them. Iowa Atheists and Freethinkers will receive a full refund of ad fees they paid. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

UPDATE: The Des Moines Register reported Friday that DART has decided to put the ads back up, and to update its advertising policies to make clear that only ads that are obscene or profane will be banned.

Korea's Constitutional Court Upholds Ban on Columbaria Near Schools

Korea's Constitutional Court on July 30 upheld a law that bans locating a columbarium within 200 meters of a school. Indian Catholic reports the court held that the law can be applied to columbaria owned by religious organizations as well as those owned privately. The court said that a nearby columbarium is likely to have a negative emotional impact on students. The law banning construction near schools was enacted in 2007 after a Catholic Church won its battle in the Supreme Court under prior law to build a columbarium in the basement of its new building next to a school. The Catholic Diocese of Seoul issued a statement criticizing the court's decision, saying it infringes religious freedom.

Court Permits Forfeiture Of Dinosaur Adventure Land Properties For Taxes Due

In United States v. Hovind, (ND FL, July 29, 2009), a Florida federal district court permitted the federal government to move ahead with its criminal forfeiture of properties that make up Dinosaur Adventure Land (as well as related bank accounts) to cover back taxes of Christian evangelist Kent Hovind. Hovind is serving a 10 year prison sentence for failing to deduct payroll taxes for the employees of his Creation Science Evangelism organization. His wife was sentenced to one year. Hovind, operating as a corporation sole with a license from the "Kingdom of Heaven" under an arrangement set up by his associate, Glenn Stoll, claimed no taxes were due on his employees who he said were missionaries. (See prior posting.) Stoll had intervened in the forfeiture case to claim that he, as trustee, owned nine of the properties being forfeited. The court rejected that claim, finding that Stoll was merely the nominal owner of the properties for Hovind. However it upheld the claim of Hovind's son, Eric Hovind, to one piece of property. The court ordered sale of the properties piecemeal to realize the $430,400 due the government, with remaining properties returned to the Hovinds. A Pensacola News Journal article Tuesday gave further background.

Suit Claims Free Exercise Right For Parochial School Student To Be In Public School Band

In Burrell, Pennsylvania, a talented eighth-grade saxophone player and his family have filed a federal lawsuit against the Burrell School District alleging that musician Alexander Trefelner's free exercise rights are being infringed by school district policy. Yesterday's Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports that Trefelner has decided to attend a Catholic high school next year instead of continuing in public school. Because of that, he will not be able to continue to participate in the public school's extracurricular band programs, even though home schooled and cyber-schooled students can. A bill pending in the state legislature would permit private school students to participate in these kinds of extracurricular activities, but it has not yet passed. Currently the decision is left to each school board. The lawsuit contends that the district is discriminating against Trefelner because he chose to pursue religious education. The school district says the issue is not that he attends a religious school, but rather that it is a private school.

Suit Charges Jewish Majority On School Board With Establishment Clause Violations

In Long Island, New York, attorneys for public school children have filed a federal lawsuit against the Lawrence School District claiming that the Orthodox Jewish majority on the board have implemented policies that violate the Establishment Clause. 5Towns Jewish Times yesterday reported that a major issue of contention is the decision by the board to close school Number 6 in Woodmere, the newest school in the district. Woodmere is also seen as being in the best physical condition and is the only handicapped accessible elementary school. Six of the seven Orthodox Jews on the board send their own children to Jewish religious schools. It is rumored that the closed school will be sold or leased to a yeshiva, or that proceeds from sale of the school will be used to pay for tax reductions for parents who send their children to non-public schools. However the school district says there are currently no plans for disposition of the school. The court denied a temporary restraining order that would have kept the school open, saying plaintiffs had little likelihood of success on the merits. [Thanks to Joel Katz (Relig. & State in Israel) for the lead.]

Criminal Contempt Charges Unsealed In Santa Rosa School Prayer Case

Yesterday's Pensacola (FL) News Journal reported that a federal judge on Monday unsealed criminal contempt charges against a high school principal and its athletic director who are charged with ignoring an injunction against faculty-led prayer. In January, nine days after U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers issued a temporary injunction prohibiting the Santa Rosa County (FL) School District officials from promoting prayers during school-sponsored events, principal Frank Lay asked athletic director Robert Freeman to lead a prayer at the beginning of a luncheon at Pace High School. Lay was one of the named defendants in the lawsuit that led to a consent decree enjoining prayer at school activities and barred school personnel from promoting their own religious beliefs at school. Another contempt action, brought by the ACLU, is pending against a school district clerk who enlisted her husband to offer a prayer at a school banquet. (See prior posting.)

AT&T Pays $1.3 M In Religious Discrimination Case

The EEOC announced last week that a Satisfaction of Judgment was entered in an Arkansas federal district court in EEOC v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, LP. In the case, the EEOC sued AT&T alleging religious discrimination in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In 2005, AT&T refused to allow the two Jehovah's Witness employees to take a vacation day to attend their annual religious convention, and then fired them when they took the time off anyway. In 2007, a jury awarded $756,000 in back pay and damages. The 8th Circuit rejected an appeal on procedural grounds. (See prior posting.) With interest, the judgment amount has grown to over $1.3 million. AT&T has now paid that amount.

Sudanese Woman Reporter Challenging Sharia Indecency Punishment

In Sudan, where sharia law is widely applied (background), journalist Lubna Ahmed al-Hussein wants to challenge the validity of applying public indecency laws-- with flogging as punishment-- to women who wear trousers. Middle East Online reported yesterday on Hussein's arrest, along with 12 other women who were wearing trousers, at a Khartoum restaurant. They are subject to punishment of up to 40 lashes. Ten others have already received this punishment. Hundreds of activists and political opponents have been demonstrating outside the court in support of al-Hussein. She argues that the indecency law is inconsistent with both the constitution and Islamic law. She says defiantly: "if the constitutional court says the law is constitutional, I'm ready to be whipped not 40 but 40,000 times." Hussein worked with the United Nations media office in Sudan, and may be entitled to immunity. She says she wants to waive her immunity to challenge the law, and has resigned her position. However one of her attorneys asserted her immunity anyway. The judge has adjourned the trial until September while the Sudanese foreign ministry rules on the immunity issue.