This morning the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the latest chapter of the battle over the use of public funding for religious schools. Supporters of such funding argue that the government should not be allowed to discriminate against religious families and schools, while opponents warn that requiring the government to allow public funds to be used for religious schools could harm public education. Both of those issues were at the forefront of today’s oral argument, as was the question of whether the lawsuit should continue at all. By the time the justices left the bench, it appeared that the outcome could hinge on the votes of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Stephen Breyer.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Wednesday, January 22, 2020
Transcript of Today's Arguments in Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue Now Available
The transcript of today's oral arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue is now available. Amy Howe at SCOTUS blog discusses the oral arguments, saying in part:
Labels:
Education Tax Credits,
US Supreme Court