Afghanistan To Re-Establish "Vice and Virtue" Department

The Middle East Times reports today that Afghanistan's government has defended its proposal to re-establish a Department for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, despite the abuses of a similar group which acted as religious police when Afghanistan was under Taliban rule. Unlike its predecessor, the new department will have no authority to patrol the streets looking for violators of Islamic law. Instead, it will use mosques and the media to encourage virtues such as prayer, charity, and respect of elders and parents, and to discourage "sins" such as adultery, murder, theft, and using alcohol. The proposal has been approved by the cabinet and will go to Parliament later this month. The government says the move is necessary to counter extremist opposition to the government that argues the country has been invaded by "infidels"-- pointing to the lack of a vice and virtue department as evidence.

Property Dispute Between New York Episcopal Parish and Diocese

In another of the growing number of disputes over ownership of church property, today's Syracuse (NY) Post-Standard reports that the Episcopal Diocese of Central New York filed a lawsuit Wednesday against St. Andrew's Church in Syracuse, asking a state trial court to grant the diocese a restraining order to prevent the parish from selling church real estate. In February, the parish which objects to positions of the diocese such as Bishop Gladstone "Skip" Adams' support of the ordination of a gay bishop, filed an amendment to its certificate of incorporation requesting that ecclesiastic oversight move from Adams to Archbishop Emmanuel Kolini, head of Anglican Church in Rwanda and of Anglican Mission in America. The diocese claims that it, and not the parish, owns the church's real estate.

Cert. Filed In California Sea Scouts Case

The Pacific Legal Foundation has announced that on July 11 it filed a petition for certiorari (full text) to the U.S. Supreme Court in Evans v. City of Berkeley. The appeal is from a March 2006 decision of the California Supreme Court in which it upheld the right of Berkeley to suspend the Sea Scouts' (an affiliate of the Boy Scouts) free use of a berth in the city's marina after the scout group refused to confirm that it would not discriminate against gays or atheists. (See prior posting.)

Article On Court-Stripping Legislation

Beginning with a reference to yesterday's passage by the House of Representatives of a bill to remove federal court jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to the Pledge of Allegiance (see prior posting), today's Indianapolis Star carries an interesting article on the history of "court-stripping" legislation.

Atheists Demand Apology For Army General's Remarks

American Atheists yesterday issued a press release demanding an apology from officials for remarks made by Lt. Army Gen. H. Steven Blum during a speech at the NAACPs Annual Armed Services and Veterans Affairs Awards Dinner on July 18. Blum, who is Chief of the National Guard Bureau, lumped atheists and agnostics together with bigots in one line of his speech in which he otherwise praised diversity in the armed forces. Blum said: "Agnostics, atheists and bigots suddenly lose all that when their life is on the line. Something that they lived with their whole life believing gets thrown out the door, and they grasp the comrade next them, and they don't care what color their skin is, and they don't care where they pray...." American Atheists President Ellen Johnson said: "Why is he singling out the millions of Americans who simply have doubts about religion or do not believe in religious teachings, and then comparing this group to 'bigots'?" The American Forces Press Service yesterday quoted extensive excerpts from Blum's speech.

Attorney Protests IRS Church Audit Procedures

BNA's Daily Report for Executives [subscription required] this week reported on a July 17 letter to Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Mark Everson from attorney Marcus Owens who says that the IRS is acting illegally in promulgating a new policy on who should determine when a tax audit of a church should be instituted. A May 9 IRS issued Chief Counsel Advice Memoranda 200623061[LEXIS link] without an opportunity for public comment. It formalized delegation for determining when a church should be audited to the Director of Exempt Organization Examinations. Owens said that in a recently released memorandum dated March 31, 2005, the Director of EO Examinations made an explicit delegation of the "reasonable belief" decision even lower within the IRS as part of the procedures for the IRS's Political Intervention Project. Owens said this is a "clear violation" of Internal Revenue Code Section 7611, which provides that an appropriate "high-level Treasury Department official must reasonably believe (on the basis of facts and circumstances) that a church may not be tax-exempt." BNA makes the full text of the letter available to subscribers.

Saudis Granted Waiver On Sanctions-- Progress On Religious Freedom Cited

The Washington Post reported yesterday that the United States has found that Saudi Arabia has made enough progress in improving religious tolerance that the U.S. is extending a waiver of sanctions that would otherwise have been called for under the International Religious Freedom Act. The waiver was originally granted in 2004 after the State Department first classified Saudi Arabia as a "country of particular concern", a designation that was continued in 2006. (See prior posting.) The State Department's release on the briefing to Congress by Ambassador John Hanford said that the Saudis are pursuing a number of policies to promote greater religious freedom and tolerance:

These include policies designed to halt the dissemination of intolerant literature and extremist ideology, both within Saudi Arabia and around the world, to protect the right to private worship, and to curb harassment of religious practice. For example, the Saudi Government is conducting a comprehensive revision of textbooks and educational curricula to weed out disparaging remarks toward religious groups, a process that will be completed in one to two years. The Saudi Government is also retraining teachers and the religious police to ensure that the rights of Muslims and non-Muslims are protected and to promote tolerance and combat extremism. The Saudi Government has also created a Human Rights Commission to address the full range of human rights complaints.

First Amendment Does Not Require Accommodation Of Job Applicant's Beliefs

In Filinovich v. Claar, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48341 (ND Ill., July 14, 2006), an Illinois federal district court applied the June 2006 holding by the 10th Circuit in Shrum v. Coweta (see prior posting) to dismiss a Free Exercise claim by Alice Filinovich who was applying for the position of Finance Director with the Village of Bolinbrook, IL. Plaintiff, a Seventh Day Adventist, claimed that, even though she was the top candidate, she was not hired by the village because her religious beliefs would not permit her to attend required quarterly budget workshops held on Saturdays. The court held that so long as the village had a legitimate reason for the neutral, generally applicable requirement of attendance at Saturday meetings, for purposes of the First Amendment-- as opposed to Title VII-- there was no requirement that the village attempt to accommodate Filinovich's religious practices. The court said that the 7th Circuit, whose decisions control it, had reached the same conclusion as Shrum in its 1991 decision in Ryan v. U.S. Department of Justice, 950 F.2d 458 [LEXIS link].

New Jersey Chief Justice Nixes Fugitive Safe Surrender Program

Federal officials have been blocked from instituting a program known as Fugitive Safe Surrender in Camden, New Jersey by church-state objections from New Jersey Chief Justice Deborah T. Poritz . The Philadelphia Inquirer reported yesterday that the program, which originated in Cleveland, grants funds to cities to get low-level fugitives into the criminal justice system without police having to confront them on the streets. Instead, the wanted criminals surrender at a church, where fugitives feel safe. Also the church community helps to spread the word about the program. The plans were to use Camden's Antioch Baptist Church.

In Cleveland, fugitives were greeted by volunteers who handed out water and pretzels, while sheriff's deputies ran their names through computerized databases. Then they met with a judge and a public defender in the church's library, and generally released on bond. The New Jersey Supreme Court, however, is concerned about court procedures taking place in a religious facility. It is also concerned that it would appear that the court was working on behalf of the prosecutor and was not neutral. The court offered to have a judge available at the courthouse to process the fugitives, but U.S. Marshall James Plousis said that is inconsistent with the underlying concept of the program.

GAO Report Reviews Faith-Based Initiative

The New York Times today carries an article about a Government Accountability Office Report issued last month on the Bush administration's faith-based initiative. The GAO did not find evidence of a widespread diversion of government money to religious activities, but in looking at 10 government programs, the GAO found that only four federal program offices gave an explicit statement to religious organizations about protecting the religious liberties of the people they serve.

Titled Faith-Based and Community Initiative: Improvements in Monitoring Grantees and Measuring Performance Could Enhance Accountability, the full report has just been posted on the GAO's website. Here is part of the Report Abstract:

Since 2001, federal agencies have awarded over $500 million through new grant programs to provide training and technical assistance to faith-based and community organizations and to increase the participation of these organizations in providing federally funded social services.... Most of the agencies provided grantees with an explicit statement on the safeguard prohibiting the use of direct federal funds for inherently religious activities. If these activities are offered, they must be offered separately in time or location from services provided with direct federal funds and must be voluntary for the beneficiary. However, we found that Justice's regulation and guidance related to these activities is unclear for its correctional programs. We also found that only four programs provided a statement on the rights of program beneficiaries and only three provided information on permissible hiring by FBOs.

While officials in all 26 FBOs [Faith Based Organizations] that we visited said that they understood that federal funds cannot be used for inherently religious activities, a few FBOs described activities that appeared to violate this safeguard. Four of the 13 FBOs that provided voluntary religious activities did not separate in time or location some religious activities from federally funded program services....

[I]t is unclear whether the data reported on grants awarded to FBOs provide policymakers with a sound basis to assess the progress of agencies in meeting the initiative's long-term goal of greater participation of faith-based and community organizations. Moreover, little information is available to assess progress toward another long-term goal of improving participant outcomes because outcome-based evaluations for many pilot programs have not begun.

Americans United Criticizes Upcoming House Vote On 2 Bills

Today a vote is scheduled in the House of Representatives on the Pledge Protection Act of 2005 (H.R. 2389) that would prevent federal courts from hearing challenges to the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance. A vote is also scheduled on H.R. 5683 that would transfer ownership of the Mt. Soledad Cross in California to the federal government. Yesterday, Americans United for Separation of Church and State issued a statement criticizing these bills. AU executive directory Barry W. Lynn said: "The leaders of the House are shamelessly pandering to their Religious Right base. The forthcoming votes on these measures hit a new low for election-year posturing."

UPDATE: On Wednesday afternoon, the House of Representatives passed the Pledge Protection Act by a vote of 260-167. Here is the roll call vote. It now goes to the Senate where the Associated Press reports that its fate is uncertain. On Wednesday afternoon, the House also passed the bill authorizing the federal government to take title to the Soledad Veterans Memorial. The roll call vote was 349 yes; 74 no; 3 present. (10news.com report.)

Church Homeless Shelter Housing Code Trial Will Begin In Florida

The South Florida Sun-Sentinel this morning reports that a jury trial is scheduled to begin July 31 in Palm Beach County, Florida's efforts to collect $30,000 in code enforcement fines from Westgate Tabernacle Church. However the Church has filed its own counter-suit claiming infringement of its free exercise rights. Westgate runs a homeless shelter that, unlike other county agencies, takes almost anyone as a resident, subject to only a few rules-- no drugs, look for work and attend services. Because of this, police bring people to the shelter every day, at the same time that the county is attempting to get it to relocate outside a residential neighborhood.

Recent Prisoner Decisions On Claims By Muslim and Atheist

In Hamdan v. Copes, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46765 (WD La., May 19, 2006), the court rejected a prisoner's claim that Muslim prisoniers at South Louisiana Correctional Center were denied the right to attend Friday Ju'mah services on a regular basis.

In Kaufman v. Frank, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47840 (WD Wis., July 13, 2006), a state prison inmate who was an atheist claimed that his rights under the First Amendment and RLUIPA were violated by: (1) references to God in the Wisconsin Constitution; (2) a state statute granting inmates access to Bibles; (3) prohibitions on sex offenders changing their names; (4) the prison's refusal to allow him to possess a silver circle emblem representing Atheist beliefs; (5) its refusal to authorize study groups for atheist and agnostic inmates; and (6) its refusal to make donated atheist literature available in the prison library. The court permitted plaintiff to proceed only as to claims that the Establishment Clause was violated by the prison's making Christian literature, but not literature about atheism available, and its excluding free non-religious items and publications while permitting other inmates to receive free religious items and publications.

Retired Professor Wants Anti-Evolution Issue On Oshkosh Wisconsin Ballot

The Oshkosh,Wisconsin Northwestern reports today on a retired University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh physics professor's petition drive to get an advisory referendum on the November ballot on the teaching of evolution in the public schools. Sandra Gade says that "the way evolution is being taught is antagonistic to students' religious beliefs. Students are told that it is a scientifically established fact that evolution, a purely natural process made all living things." She wants to require teaching of facts that discredit as well as those that support evolution. Despite Glade's efforts, state law has no provision for school boards to place an advisory referendum on the ballot.

Evangelist Argues Lack of Jurisdiction After Indictment For Tax Fraud

In Pensacola, Florida on Monday, evangelist Kent Hovind pled not guilty to a 58-count federal indictment charging him with tax fraud, avoiding financial reporting requirements and impeding an IRS investigation. Today's Pensacola News Journal reports on the rather outlandish claims of immunity made by Hovind who owns Dinosaur Adventure Land, a creationist theme park. Hovind claims that the federal government has no jurisdiction over him, and when pressed in court to enter a plea Hovind said he wished to enter a plea of "subornation of false muster."

Hovind is accused of paying employees of his Creation Science Ministry in cash and calling them missionaries to avoid withholding payroll and FICA taxes. His wife is also charged. For years Hovind has claimed that he is employed by God and has no income or property because everything he owns belongs to God. Hovind believes that man and dinosaurs inhabited the earth at the same time and has offered a $250,000 reward to anyone who can furnish satisfactory proof of evolution.

Muslim Group Claims Zoning Discrimination

In Wayne, New Jersey, according to today's Star-Ledger the Albanian Associated Fund, a Muslim organization, has sued the township claiming it has been discriminated against in its application to build a mosque on an 11-acre site it owns. The federal court suit filed yesterday attempts to stop the township from condemning the land for open space use, claiming violations of constitutional rights and of RLUIPA. The suit claims that Wayne's planning board has given in to anti-Muslim sentiment and for 3 1/2 years has forced the group to take application steps not required of others.

Arkansas Supreme Court Dismisses Claims Against Parochial School As Involving Religious Doctrine

In Calvary Christian School Inc. v. Huffstutler, (Ark. Sup. Ct., June 29, 2006). the Arkansas Supreme Court held that it lacked jurisdiction over most of the claims brought by the parents of a parochial school student who was "disenrolled" from the school after he and his parents complained about a video camera that they discovered was hidden in the vetilation system of a school classroom that was also used as a dressing room for school events. In order to keep their son enrolled in school, his parents signed an agreement to support the policies and administration of the school and not to make any negative comments that could possibly destroy the ministry and unity of the school. However subsequently the parents made comments that violated the agreement, and the student was dismissed. The majority agreed with Calvary Christian School that the dismissal was based on failure to comply with school policies that are based in Matthew 18 principles. This made it a theological dispute over which the court could not exercise jurisdiction under First Amendment principles. The majority also dismissed one of the claims because there was no evidence that the camera had ever been used to film anything. Three justices dissented, each as to different aspects of the majority's opinion.

Religious Objections Impede Prosecution Of US Soldiers In Iraq Murder Case

U.S. authorities are preparing their case against five soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division who are accused of raping and murdering 14-year old Abeer al-Janabi near the town of Mahmoudiya in Iraq on March 12. A sixth soldier is accused of failing to report the crime. Those still on active duty face an Article 32 hearing, a proceeding similar to a grand jury. However the prosecution is being impeded by objections from the girl's family to the exhumation of her body. The Associated Press today reports that al-Janabi's relatives have refused to allow her body to be exhumed after objections from a Muslim cleric. Islamic law views exhumations as desecration of the dead. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki argues that Iraqi courts should try cases of abuse by American soldiers and has called for a review of the agreement giving foreign troops immunity from Iraqi prosecution.

Colorado City Will Limit Display To Christmas Trees

Fort Collins, Colorado city council last Tuesday voted to continue to display only Christmas trees during the 2006 holiday season, rejecting requests to also include a menorah in the December holiday display. The Coloradoan today quotes Council Member Kurt Kastein: "I'm not afraid to say it's Christmas. And I have no problem defending a Christmas tree in the public display." The city's Human Relations Commission said that limiting displays to Christmas trees would be exclusionary. It recommended that city property be made available year-round for displays by private groups that first obtain a permit, and had offered to create a Holiday Display Community Task Force.

Suits Against Las Cruces For Using Crosses In City Logo Pending

The Las Cruces Sun-News yesterday reported on developments in a federal lawsuit that had been filed last September challenging the presence of three crosses in the official emblem of the city of Las Cruces, New Mexico. (See prior posting.) The question is whether the city is violating the establishment clause in spending public funds to put the crosses on city logos and city buildings. In the latest development, plaintiffs are challenging a report by New Mexico State University history professor Jon Hunner, who was selected to provide the court with a history of the city's symbol. Plaintiff Paul Weinbaum says the report is tainted by a conflict of interest because Hunner was also providing a similar report to the city's Convention and Visitors Bureau. The city has spent $16,000 in legal fees so far. Trial in the case is set for Nov. 27. Another case against the Las Cruces Public Schools for its use of crosses on its vehicles and logos is also pending.