Montana Church Loses Challenge To State Campaign Laws

Earlier this week, a Montana federal district court rejected a First Amendment free exercise and free expression challenge by the Canyon Ferry Road Baptist Church in East Helena, Montana to an order issued last March by the Montana Commissioner of Political Practices. (See prior posting.) The Associated Press reported yesterday that the court upheld the state's ruling that the church should have reported its support of activities in 2004 to get voters to pass a constitutional ban on gay marriage. The church's activities turned it into an "incidental campaign committee" under state law. The court rejected the church's argument that the state's campaign laws are unconstitutional.

UPDATE: Here is the full opinion in Canyon Ferry Road Baptist Church v. Higgins, (D MT, Sept. 26, 2006).

Suit Filed To Get VA Approval Of Wiccan Symbols On Military Headstones

Yesterday, the American Civil Liberties Union filed suit on behalf of several plaintiffs, asking the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims "to direct the National Cemetery Administration (NCA) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to respond to long-pending applications to include the Wiccan Pentacle among the emblems of belief that may be engraved on government-issued headstones and markers of deceased veterans." In the complaint in Egbert v. Nicholson (full text), plaintiffs based their request on the Administrative Procedure Act, the First Amendment's free expression and establishment clauses, and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. In a press release announcing the filing of the litigation, the ACLU quoted its staff attorney, Aaron Caplan: "The government has no business picking and choosing which personal religious beliefs may be expressed. All veterans, regardless of their religion, deserve to have their faith recognized on an equal basis." (See prior related posting.)

Tennessee School To Reconsider Distribution Of Gideon Bibles

The Lebanon Tennessee Special School District is considering whether to end a long-time practice of permitting the Gideons to drop off Bibles on display tables in the schools once each year for interested fifth graders to take home. The Tennessean reports that the board decided to re-examine its policy after a parent complained that the practice takes away from parents the decision as to what religious literature their children should receive.

Airport Will Accommodate Muslim Cabbies' Objections To Alcohol

The Metropolitan Airports Commission of Minneapolis-St. Paul, in Minnesota, is dealing with a new issue of accommodation of Muslim religious practices. On Thursday, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported that some 75% of the 900 taxi drivers at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport are Somalis, many of whom are Muslim. Observant Muslim cabbies object to transporting passengers carrying alcohol that is openly displayed. So arriving passengers are sometimes refused taxi service when a driver sees them carrying wine or liquor. To deal with the issue, the Airports Commission is proposing to place color-coded lights on taxi roofs to indicate which cabs will accept riders carrying alcohol. Taxi starters at the airport curb will then be able to direct passengers carrying, for example, duty free bags containing alcoholic beverages to cabs that will accept them. [Thanks to Eugene Volokh via Religionlaw for the lead.]

Security At Red Mass Does Not Violate Religious Protesters' Rights

In Mahoney v. United States Marshals Service, (DDC, Sept. 27, 2006), the federal district court for the District of Columbia this week upheld security arrangements imposed by the US Marshals Service on the Red Mass held each year in St. Matthew's Cathedral just before the first Monday opening of the U.S. Supreme Court's session. A Presbyterian minister, a fellow-Christian, and a Christian religious organization had claimed that the restrictions on protesters violated their First Amendment speech rights and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The plaintiffs wished to carry signs supporting the public display of the Ten Commandments. The court found that the challenged security restrictions were narrowly drawn, content neutral time, place and manner regulations, and that they did not impose a substantial burden on plaintiffs' free exercise of religion. Demonstrators had adequate alternative channels available to them. [Thanks to Blog from the Capital for the lead.]

Many New Articles Of Interest Have Recently Appeared

From American Political Science Association:
Carolyn M. Warner & Manfred W. Wenner, Religion and the Political Organization of Muslims in Europe, (Perspectives on Politics, Sept. 2006).

From SSRN:
Tanya Marie Johnson, The Defense of Marriage Act and the Establishment Clause , (April 21, 2006).

From Bepress:
Jennifer Kreder, Undoing the Native American Graves and Repartriation Act, (September 6, 2006).

Elisabeth D. Reid, The Faith Based and Community Initiative and the Challenge Posed by the Establishment Clause, (September 9, 2006).

Andrew Koppelman, Conscience, Volitional Necessity, and Religious Exemptions, (September 15, 2006).

Kojo Yelpaala, Legal Consciousness and Contractual Obligations, (September 19, 2006).

From SmartCILP:
Adlia Abusharaf, Women in Islamic Communities: The Quest for Gender Justice Research, 28 Human Rights Quarterly 714-728 (2006).

Waheeda Amien, Overcoming the Conflict Between the Right to Freedom of Religion and Women's Rights to Equality: a South African Case Study of Muslim Marriages, 28 Human Rights Quarterly 729-754 (2006).

Nora O'Callaghan, Lessons from Pharaoh and the Hebrew Midwives: Conscientious Objection to State Mandates As a Free Exercise Right, 39 Creighton Law Review 561-639 (2006).

Daniel J. Rosenthal, Charitable Choice Programs and Title VII's Co-religionist Exemption, 39 Creighton Law Review 641-665 (2006).

Panel: The History, Religion, and Philosophy of American Exceptionalism. Articles by Claes G. Ryn, Joseph Boyle, William T. Cavanaugh and Charles J. Reid, Jr. 3 University of St. Thomas Law Journal 211-310 (2005).

Tennessee School Sued Over "Praying Parents" Group

The ACLU of Tennessee filed suit in federal court this week on behalf of the parents of a kindergartener against the Wilson County (TN) Schools and various school officials. The lawsuit challenges Christian meetings and prayer events that are held at Lakeview Elementary School in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee. The Tennessean reports today that the challenged activities include a "Praying Parents" group that meets in the school cafeteria during school hours and drops off fliers in classrooms to let children know the group has prayed for them. The Praying Parents group is featured on the school's website. The suit also says that the school observed "National Day of Prayer" by holding a student poster competition and handing out "I prayed" stickers to students.

EEOC Sues On Behalf of Jehovah's Witness Waitress

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed a religious discrimination lawsuit against Razzoo's Cajun Cafe in Dallas, Texas, according to yesterday's Dallas Business Journal. The suit grows out of a complaint by a Jehovah's Witness who was employed as a waitress at the restaurant. She requested not to be part of birthday celebrations for customers at the restaurant because her religion forbids such celebrations. She offered to cover other waitresses' tables while they sang for customers, but the restaurant refused to accommodate her and instead fired her from her job.

Hungarian Protests Have Antisemitic Flavor

Today's edition of the Forward reports that the anti-government riots that have shaken the Hungarian capital of Budapest for over a week have used antisemitic terminology and symbols. Among these are the red and white flag of Hungary’s World War II fascists. Hungarian Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány has been condemned by rioters and their sympathizers in veiled, and sometimes more explicitly, antisemitic language. Gyurcsany is not Jewish.

Religious Polygamists Prevalent In Upscale Utah Subdivisions

A syndicated article from the Chicago Tribune today focuses on the prevalence of polygamy in upscale subdivisions around Salt Lake City, Utah. After US. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid from Nevada, who is a Mormon, wrote Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on Sept. 12 to request a federal task force to investigate polygamous sects in the Western U.S. (full text of letter), many polygamists have come forward to defend their religious beliefs in plural marriage. They say it fulfills the mission of all Mormons to be fruitful and multiply and to ascend to the highest reaches of heaven. They decry the fact that the mainstream Mormon church in 1890 abandoned polygamy for what they see as political expediency. Experts estimate that 40,000 people live in polygamous families in the Western U.S., with most of those in Utah.

Vatican Message To U.N. On Religious Freedom

Zenit has published the full text of a Sept. 21 address on Religious Freedom In the Global Village delivered to the United Nations Human Rights Council by Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Holy See's permanent observer to the U.N.'s office in Geneva.

Pennsylvania Upholds Father's Right To Teach Religious Belief In Polygamy

Yesterday in Shepp v. Shepp, (PA Sup. Ct., Sept. 27, 2006) (majority opinion, concurrence, dissent) the Pennsylvania Supreme Court refused to order a divorced father to refrain from discussing his religious views that favor polygamy with his daughter whose custody he is sharing. The order was sought by the child's mother who divorced her former husband because of his beliefs in polygamy. The court said:

Based on the record before us, it is clear that the Commonwealth’s interest in promoting compliance with the statute criminalizing bigamy is not an interest of the "highest order" that would supersede the interest of a parent in speaking to a child about a deeply held aspect of his faith.... The state’s compelling interest to protect a child in any given case ... is not triggered unless a court finds that a parent’s speech is causing or will cause harm to a child’s welfare.

However Justice Baer dissenting argued:

It is imperative ... to distinguish matters of free expression from matters of immoral and criminal conduct. Where the former amounts to indoctrination into the latter, constitutional rights begin to yield to society’s interests in regulating such conduct.

The Associated Press reports on the decision.

Wisconsin City Settles RLUIPA Suit

Today's Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports that the city of New Berlin, Wisconsin has reached a settlement with SS Constantine and Helen Greek Orthodox Church in a long-running zoning dispute. In 2005, the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the city's refusal to grant the church's rezoning request violated RLUIPA. This week's settlement requires the city to pay the church $370,000 in damages and will rezone the land to permit the church to build once it applies for a building permit and submits plans. The agreement still needs to be approved by the court.

EEOC Charges Private College With Religious Discrimination

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has sued a private college, the University of Phoenix, alleging that the school favors enrollment counselors who are members of the Mormon Church over other counselors. Yesterday's Arizona Republic reports that the EEOC charged that non-Mormon counselors employed by the University were not given the same leads on new students and were discriminated against in other ways as well.

Religious Clubs Thrive In South Florida Schools

Today's Miami Herald says that religious clubs are thriving in public schools in South Florida. The Christian group, First Priority, has 80 chapters in Broward and Palm Beach counties, supported by local churches. Jewish and Muslim, as well as Christian groups are on Miami-Dade middle and high school campuses. The federal Equal Access Act requires that such groups be treated in the same way as non-religious extracurricular organizations in public secondary schools.

FLDS Jeffs Charges Religious Persecution

Walter Bugden, attorney for Warren Jeffs, the jailed leader of the FLDS Church, says that his client views his prosecution for rape as an accomplice and for sexual conduct with a minor to be religious persecution. The St. George (UT) Spectrum reported on the remarks that were made yesterday after a brief scheduling conference was held in court for Jeffs who is charged in connection with arranging polygamous marriages involving minors.

German Officials, Muslim Leaders, Confer On Divisive Issues

Today's New York Times reports that in Berlin yesterday 15 government officials held a conference with 15 German Muslim leaders to discuss issues that divide Muslims from non-Muslims. Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, organized and chaired the conference. The issue on which all participants agreed was that the Detusche Oper of Berlin should reverse its decision to cancel the Mozart opera Idomeneo in which a scene includes the severed head of the Prophet Muhammad. Opera officials feared a violent reaction from Muslims. (See prior posting.) Other issues discussed at the conference included teaching of the Islamic religion in public schools, training of imams in Germany, construction of mosques, and discrimination against Muslims in Germany.

State Employee's Religious Discrimination Claim Survives

In Garcia v. Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, 2006 U.S Dist. LEXIS 68463 (ND IL, Sept. 11, 2006), an Illinois federal district court permitted a state employee to proceed with her Title VII religious discrimination claim that religious items were removed from her cubicle, that she was told to stop performing the sign of the cross and to stop saying "bendito," and that the regional administrator said her performance of the sign of the cross was one of the reasons she was required to undergo a fitness-for-duty examination.

Florida Church For Homeless Sues For Discrimination In Zoning

In Gainesville, Florida on Tuesday, Fire of God Ministries sued the city in federal court alleging religious discrimination in requiring the church to obtain a special use permit to operate when the city previously allowed a Moose Lodge to hold meetings on the same property without a permit. The Gainesville Sun reports that the church's congregation is largely homeless, and the church feeds them meals as well as holding services.

Illinois Church Election Under Court Supervision Upheld

In Marsaw v. Richards, 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 870 (IL App., Sept. 22, 2006), and Illinois state court of appeals upheld a trial court's judgment that resolved a dispute between two factions of the Bethlehem Healing Temple Church through ordering an election that it supervised. The Court of Appeals found that the trial court had resolved the dispute using neutral principles of civil law. Even though the church's formal election procedures had often not been used in the past, they were still operative. The court also held that the results of a judicial proceeding are not burdens on religious practice that violate the Illinois Religious Freedom Restoration Act.