Sale of Mt. Soledad Memorial Site To Private Organization Completed

The  Mt. Soledad Memorial Association announced this week that it has completed the purchase from the Defense Department of the half-acre parcel on Mt. Soledad in La Jolla, California, on which the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial is located. It said in part:

The sales price was $1.4 million with the all-cash transaction completed on Friday, July 17. It follows the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2015, signed into law by Congress and signed by the President of the United States in December 2014, calling for the sale of the property by the federal government to the Association.

The sale apparently ends the dispute-- in litigation for over 25 years-- over the constitutionality of the 43 foot high cross that is the centerpiece of the memorial.

Congress Gives Final Passage To Defense Authorization Act Including Provisions On Mt. Soledad Transfer

On Friday, the Senate gave final approval and sent to the President for his signature H.R. 3979, the  National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (full text). The Act includes a provision (Sec. 2852) calling for the sale of the Mt. Soledad Veteran's Memorial to the privately incorporated Mount Soledad Memorial Association.  The provision, sponsored by Sen. Diane Feinstein, is intended to end the long-running litigation challenging the Memorial's cross as a violation of the Establishment Clause. (See prior posting.) Politico reports on the Act's passage.

The Act also contains provisions regarding the National Park System, including (Sec. 3051) a requirement that the Secretary of the Interior conduct studies to determine whether various sites should be designated as national parks.  Among these sites are properties in Flushing, New York relating to the history of religious freedom during the era of the signing of the Flushing Remonstrance; and Atlanta's West Hunter Street Baptist Church (background).

The Act as passed does not include provisions in an earlier House version relating to military chaplains and religious expression. (See prior posting.)

Cert. Petition Seeks SCOTUS Review of Latest Mt.Soledad Cross Decision Ahead of 9th Circuit

A petition for certiorari before judgment (full text) was filed yesterday with the U.S. Supreme Court in Mt. Soledad Memorial Association v. Trunk, asking the Court to review the latest decision in the long-running case prior to the 9th Circuit hearing arguments or deciding the latest appeal.  Petitioners are seeking review of a December federal district court order requiring a 43-foot high cross to be removed from the now federally-owned Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in California. (See prior posting.) Legal challenges to the cross have worked their way up and down the courts for 25 years. Liberty Institute issued a press release announcing the filing of the petition.

District Court Orders Mt. Soledad Cross Removed; Appeals Expected

On Thursday, yet another opinion was handed down in the litigation challenging the constitutionality of the cross that is part of the Mt. Soledad veterans' Memorial. Various lawsuits over over the 43-foot high cross on public property in California have spanned 24 years.  In 2011, the 9th Circuit (see prior posting) held that the Memorial conveys an endorsement of religion that violates the Establishment Clause, but added: "This result does not mean that the Memorial could not be modified to pass constitutional muster nor does it mean that no cross can be part of this veterans’ memorial." The 9th Circuit remanded the case to the district court to determine the appropriate remedy.

After attempts to appeal the 9th Circuit's ruling were rejected, the district court in Trunk v. City of San Diego, (SD CA, Dec. 12, 2013) has now held that the cross must be removed.  It said that despite the 9th Circuit's statement that changes in the Memorial might make it constitutionally acceptable, language in the 9th Circuit's opinion "makes it clear that removal of the large, historic cross is the only remedy that the Ninth Circuit conceives will cure the constitutional violation."  This is unlikely to be the last word, however, because the court also stayed its order pending the resolution of any appeal.  Liberty Institute says that it will appeal the ruling, all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. Wall Street Journal reports on the decision.