Cert. Denied In Kansas Science Curriculum Challenge

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied review in COPE v. Kansas State Board of Education, (Docket No. 16-229, cert. denied 11/14/2016). (Order List.)  In the case, the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed on standing grounds an Establishment Clause challenge to Kansas' curriculum standards for science instruction in grades K-12, saying that "COPE offers only threadbare assertions that the Standards intend to promote a non-religious worldview." (See prior posting.) Topeka Capital-Journal reports on the denial of certiorari.

10th Circuit: Challenge To Kansas School Science Standards Dismissed on Standing Grounds

In COPE v. Kansas State Board of Education, (10th Cir., April 19, 2016), the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed on standing grounds an Establishment Clause challenge to Kansas' curriculum standards for science instruction in grades K-12.  Plaintiffs claimed that the State Board’s adoption of the Standards communicated a religious message, and their implementation will result in anti-religious instruction.  The court said in part:

[T]he Standards do not condemn any or all religions and do not target religious believers for disfavored treatment. And COPE offers only threadbare assertions that the Standards intend to promote a non-religious worldview. Thus, COPE’s allegations regarding adoption amount to psychological consequences produced by observation of conduct with which it disagrees.... This injury does not suffice....

Court Dismisses Challenge By Theists To Kansas Science Standards

In COPE v. Kansas State Board of Education, (D KA, Dec. 2, 2014), a Kansas federal district court dismissed on 11th Amendment and standing grounds a challenge to the Kansas State Board of Education science Framework and Standards. Students, parents, taxpayers and a non-profit organization sued claiming that adoption of these guidelines "will cause Kansas public schools to establish and endorse a non-theistic religious worldview in violation of the Establishment, Free Exercise, and Speech Clauses of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."  As further explained by the court:

Plaintiffs contend that the Standards ... use... deceptive methods to lead impressionable children to answer questions about the cause of life with only materialistic or atheistic answers.

In its 25-page discussion of standing, the court said in part:

The Court concludes that our Circuit, when confronted with plaintiffs’ standing argument in this case, would follow the reasoning used by the Seventh and District of Columbia Circuits and hold that plaintiffs lack standing to sue where the only injury alleged is based on a “message” of government endorsement of religion.

AP reports on the decision. COPE has links to pleadings in the case.