Romney Addresses Importance of Religious Freedom To Non-Believers

On Friday, former presidential candidate Gov. Mitt Romney and his wife Ann were awarded the Becket Fund's Canterbury Medal for "Courage in the Defense of Religious Liberty." (Press release). In his acceptance speech (full transcript), Romney reflected on his now-famous speech about religious liberty and his religious beliefs delivered last December during his unsuccessful campaign for the Republican presidential nomination. (See prior posting.) In one portion of his address at the Becket Fund dinner, Romney responded to criticism that he had not mentioned the rights of non-believers in December. Romney told the Becket Fund audience:

upon reflection, I realized that while I could defend their absence from my address, I had missed an opportunity…an opportunity to clearly assert the following: non-believers have just as great a stake as believers in defending religious liberty.

If a society takes it upon itself to prescribe and proscribe certain streams of belief – to prohibit certain less-favored strains of conscience – it may be the non-believer who is among the first to be condemned. A coercive monopoly of belief threatens everyone, whether we are talking about those who search the philosophies of men or follow the words of God.

We are all in this together. Religious liberty and liberality of thought flow from the common conviction that it is freedom, not coercion, that exalts the individual just as it raises up the nation.

Romney also strongly defended his December statement that "freedom requires religion." Saturday's Salt Lake Tribune reports on the Becket fund speech.

Court says RLUIPA Applies To Zoning Limits On 12-Step Program

Friday's Prescott (AZ) Daily Courier reports on an unusual RLUIPA decision by an Arizona Superior Court judge in Yavapai County. The case involves attempts by an AA 12-step program, known as Safe Harbor, to operate out of a neighborhood location in north Prescott. The city claimed that AA needed a special use permit to operate. In rejecting that claim, the court, noting AA's spiritual nature, applied the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. It held that "the city's effort to 'zone' the AA members of Safe Harbor out of the property is a land-use regulation which imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of the AA members of Safe Harbor and of AA..."

Next Steps In FLDS Custody Proceedings Described

Yesterday's Ft. Worth Star-Telegram reports on what to expect at the next round of hearings, scheduled to begin May 19, in the cases of 464 children taken into state custody from the FLDS compound in Eldorado, Texas. In simultaneous hearings in 5 San Angelo courtrooms, children will be grouped by family so that siblings will have hearings together. The hearings are likely to continue the children in state custody while parents work on "service plans" to meet Child Protective Service guidelines for return of their children. The court will attempt to to complete all hearings by June 5, the 60-day deadline as required by law.

Faith Group Sues Over California Limits On Its Use of Park To Feed Homeless

In Orange County, California, an interfaith religious group, Welcome INN (Interfaith Needs Network), has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the state's limits on public assemblies and demonstrations in state parks. According to a press release by the ACLU, when the group attempted to set up supplies in a Doheny State Park picnic area in order to offer a meal to the homeless, a park ranger told them to disperse, citing California Administrative Code, Title 14, Sec. 4321 that requires permission of the Department of Parks and Recreation in order to hold an assembly there. This action came after the group, on two previous days, used the park to conduct a prayer, serve donated food to about 20 homeless people, distribute Bibles and refer those who requested it to local social service agencies. The complaint (full text) in Welcome INN, Inc. v. Coleman, (CD CA, filed 5/7/08) alleges that the permit provision is an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech in a traditional public forum, and its enforcement against the group infringes their speech, associational and free exercise rights.

Today's Los Angeles Times, reporting on the case, quotes ACLU attorney Hector Villagra who compares the gathering of homeless at the state beach to picnics and barbecues that are allowed there. Park officials say this is different because it is an organized feeding event that requires a special use permit, like all other formal gatherings.

Group Seeking To Set Up Test Case On Tax Code Non-Profit Limits

Today's Wall Street Journal reports that Alliance Defense Fund is attempting to create a constitutional test case to challenge the tax code limits on church involvement in political campaigns. It is seeking 40 to 50 houses of worship to take part in a protest on Sept. 28. ADF is asking clergy to preach sermons on that day about candidates in the November election. Under the Internal Revenue Code, churches and other charitable groups can be fined or lose their non-profit tax status if they endorse or oppose political candidates.

Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Standard For Religious Discrimination

In Nakashima v. Oregon State Board of Education, (OR Sup. Ct., May 8, 2008), the Oregon Supreme Court clarified the test that is to be used in determining whether a public school program is "fair in form but discriminatory in operation" so that it violates Oregon's anti-discrimination statutes. At issue was an attempt by Portland Adventist Academy (PAA) to get the Oregon School Activities Association to alter the schedule of the 2A State High School Boys' Basketball Tournament. PAA requested the change so that its basketball team would not be required to compete on their Sabbath. The court remanded the case to the Oregon State Board of Education for it to determine whether the challenged scheduling policy that adversely impacts PAA is "reasonably necessary" to the successful administration of the Tournament. The AP yesterday reported on the decision. (See prior related posting.)

10th Circuit Upholds Bald Eagle Protection Against RFRA Challenge

In United States v. Friday, (10th Cir., May 8, 2008), the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a challenge under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to the government's enforcement of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ("Eagle Act"). The case involved the prosecution of Winslow Friday, a member of the Northern Arapaho Tribe, for killing a bald eagle so he could use it in his tribe's Sun Dance. Friday had never applied for a permit under the Eagle Act. The district court had held that the government's permit process was so maladministered that it would have been futile for Friday to apply for a permit. The Court of Appeals disagreed with this finding. It went on to hold that "the Eagle Act and its regulations are the least restrictive means of pursuing the government’s compelling interest in preserving the bald eagle." The AP yesterday reported on the decision. (See prior related posting.)

UPDATE: The May 13 San Diego Union-Tribune follows up on the decision with a mixed reaction to it from Sarah Krakoff, an associate professor of law at the University of Colorado. It also reports that Winslow Friday's attorney is considering seeking en banc review of the 3-judge panel's decision.

Two Schools Want Exemption From Quebec's Religious Culture Course

As previously reported, Quebec's Education Department is requiring, starting next fall, all public and private religious schools to offer a new course in Ethics and Religious Culture. Yesterday's Montreal Gazette reported that two schools have asked for an exemption from the requirement. Loyola High School, a Jesuit institution in Notre Dame de Grâce, told the Education Department that its students are already "strongly formed" in the key values to be taught in the new course. The other school seeking an exemption is Emmanuel Christian School in Dollard des Ormeaux. The Education Department says that the new course is intended to teach religious culture so students will be able to understand the importance of places of worship, beliefs and religious institutions in the province.

Feds Appoint Prosecutor To Focus On Polygamy Issues

Today's Salt Lake Tribune reports that the U.S. Justice Department has appointed a senior, career prosecutor to work with Utah, Arizona and Nevada to combat polygamy related crimes. This disclosure came in letters that Nevada Sen. Harry Reid sent this week to the attorneys general of Utah and Arizona. Today's Toronto Globe and Mail says that the U.S. investigation may extend to combating the so-called "polygamy underground railway" across the Canada-U.S. border through which young women are sent to marry older men. Women are sent between FLDS communities in British Columbia, Utah and Arizona. This action by the Justice Department may be the first step toward appointing a special task force. Last week, the Deseret News reported that Sen. Reid had long been pushing for the Justice Department to take action. Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff, while welcoming federal involvement, took issue with Reid's criticism of Utah's law enforcement. Shurtleff said Utah has done much to combat polygamy.

Meanwhile yesterday in St. George, Utah, some 200 people attended the annual conference presented by the Utah-Arizona Safety Net Committee to hear presentations by members of polygamous communities, news media, social service providers and law enforcement. Yesterday's Salt Lake Tribune quotes conference participant Anne Wilde from the "fundamentalist Mormon" advocacy group, Principle Voices, who said that fundamentalist Mormons represent a wide diversity of beliefs, and should not all be lumped together with the FLDS.

Malaysian Sharia Court Agrees To Cancel Woman's Prior Conversion To Islam

AFP today describes as "rare" a decision handed down in Malaysia by Penang Sharia Court judge Othman Ibrahim. He permitted a Buddhist woman who had converted to Islam to reconvert to Buddhism. Islamic courts usually do not permit renunciations of Islam, but here the court said that Siti Fatimah only converted in order to be able to marry a Muslim man. She never practised Islam. Now that her husband has left her the judge said he had no choice but to order her original conversion certificate nullified since she had continued to practice Buddhism anyway. The woman now still has to convince authorities to change her identity card so she will no longer be classified as a Muslim on it.

Christian Student Group Sues to Challenge University Speech Code

On Wednesday, a student group, the Christian Fellowship, filed suit in federal court against Pennsylvania's Shippensburg University challenging university rules that plaintiff claims chills free speech and infringes its free exercise of religion. The complaint (full text) in Christian Fellowship of Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania v. Rudd, (MD PA, filed 5/7/08) alleges that "Christian Fellowship is a religious expressive student organization whose members hold and seek to advance Biblically-based opinions and beliefs regarding issues of race, gender, politics, and religion that may be objectionable or offensive to other students and sanctionable under applicable University speech codes." According to a release by the Alliance Defense Fund, a similar 2004 lawsuit was settled when the University agreed to revoke challenged provision in its speech code, but since then it has re-enacted many of the same policies. Today's Hagerstown (MD) Herald-Mail reports on the lawsuit.

Evangelical Manifesto Released Urging A "Civil Public Square"

Yesterday in a Washington, DC press conference, over 70 religious leaders endorsed a document titled An Evangelical Manifesto (full text, summary). Here is a small part of what it had to say about the place of Evangelicals in public life:

[W]e repudiate two equal and opposite errors into which many Christians have fallen. One error is to privatize faith, applying it to the personal and spiritual realm only.... The other error, made by both the religious left and the religious right, is to politicize faith, using faith to express essentially political points that have lost touch with biblical truth. That way faith loses its independence, Christians become the "useful idiots" for one political party or another, and the Christian faith becomes an ideology. Christian beliefs become the weapons of political factions....

[W]e repudiate the two extremes that define the present culture wars in the United States..... We are committed to a civil public square – a vision of public life in which citizens of all faiths are free to enter and engage the public square on the basis of their faith, but within a framework of what is agreed to be just and free for other faiths as well....

[W]e are concerned that a generation of culture warring ... has created a powerful backlash against all religion in public life among many educated people.... [W]e are concerned that globalization and the emerging global public square have no matching vision of how to live with our deepest differences on the global stage.... [W]e warn of the danger of a two-tier global public square. This is a model of public life which reserves the top tier for cosmopolitan secular liberals, and the lower tier for local religious believers.

The Associated Press, reported on the document, pointing out that a number of Christian religious leaders on the political right do not support it. Americans United for Separation of Church and State gave the Manifesto qualified praise, or, as it said, it gave it "one amen". More information on the Manifesto, including a lengthy Study Guide, is available on the Evangelical Manifesto website.

Religious Monuments Case Delays Army Memorial To Plane Crash Victims

June 14 is the 65th anniversary of the World War II "Bakers Creek" plane crash in Australia that killed 40 U.S. troops. Families of the soldiers, veterans' organizations, and others have contributed money for a monument to the soldiers that they want the Army to place at Ft. Myer, near Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. Scripps Howard News Service yesterday reported that the Army however is holding off on accepting the monument because of a pending Supreme Court case on religious monuments. In Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, the Supreme Court will decide whether a city created a "public forum" open to others as well by accepting a donation of a 10 Commandments monument put up in a city park. (See prior posting.)

In reporting to Congress last week, an Army spokesman wrote: "Due to the ramifications that this case may have on the Army's acceptance of the Bakers Creek Memorial or any other monument funded by private funds, the Army will await the Supreme Court's decision to assess its options." Robert Cutler, executive director of the Bakers Creek Memorial Association, suggested a solution-- have the Army buy the memorial for a nominal amount so it is not "donated". Meanwhile the memorial remains temporarily at the Australian Embassy in Washington. (A posting at Texomas carries a photo of the memorial.)

McCain Speaks Out On International Religious Freedom

Yesterday, Republican presidential candidate John McCain spoke at Oakland University in Rochester, Michigan on "his vision for defending the freedom and dignity of the world's vulnerable." In his speech (full text) he had this to say about religious freedom:

There is no right more fundamental to a free society than the free practice of religion. Behind walls of prisons and persecuted before our very eyes in places like China, Iran, Burma, Sudan, North Korea and Saudi Arabia are tens-of-thousands of people whose only crime is to worship God in their own way. No society that denies religious freedom can ever rightly claim to be good in some other way. And no person can ever be true to any faith that believes in the dignity of all human life if they do not act out of concern for those whose dignity is assailed because of their faith. As President, I intend to make religious freedom a subject of great importance for the United States in our relations with other nations.

In the speech he also focused on the evils of human trafficking and use of the Internet by child predators. CNN reported on the speech.

San Angelo Mayor Writes of Logistical Challenges After FLDS Ranch Raid

Scripps Howard News Service yesterday carried a piece by J.W. Lown, the 31-year old mayor of San Angelo, Texas, the town located some 45 miles north of the FLDS Ranch that was raided by authorities last month. Lown gives a candid account of how he dealt with the demands placed on his city for space to house the over 400 children taken into state custody along with many of their mothers. Lown also looks at the deluge of media that appeared, saying "Every media outlet complimented me and the city of San Angelo for the Port-A-Potties and refreshments we delivered." Lown concluded: "Though our role as 'host' is drawing to an end, you will still see plenty of San Angelo on TV. All those mothers you've seen strolling up courthouse steps in their pastel prairie dresses? That's the Tom Green County Courthouse in San Angelo. And their day in court isn't over."

Kansas High Court Upholds Citizen Grand Jury Law Used By Abortion Foes

Yesterday in Tiller v. Corrigan, (KA Sup. Ct., May 6, 2008), the Kansas Supreme Court upheld provisions of K.S.A. 22-3001 providing for citizens to petition for the empanelling of a grand jury. The court held that the provisions are not unconstitutional on their face. The law, used in Kansas by by abortion opponents to obtain investigations of abortion clinics, was challenged on separation of powers grounds. In upholding the law, the unanimous decision went on to say that the court in which the citizen petition is filed must review the validity of the petition and oversee the grand jury process. The supreme court also concluded that a citizen-empanelled grand jury has authority to issue subpoenas for documents, but the supervising court must assure that the grand jury is not on arbitrary fishing expedition and that the subpoena targets were not selected out of malice or with intent to harass. Finally, the supreme court said that when valid subpoenas are issued for patient records, a number of steps must be taken to protect patient privacy. Yesterday's Kansas City Star reported on the decision. (See prior related posting.) [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Maryland High Court Refuses To Grant Comity To Pakistani Talaq Divorce

In Aleem v. Aleem, (Ct. App. Md., May 6, 2008), the Maryland Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) refused to recognize a talaq divorce obtained under the laws of Pakistan (Mulsim Family Laws Ordinance 1961) by a husband who, with his wife, resided in Maryland. The parties, married in Pakistan in 1980, resided in the U.S. on diplomatic visas.

After Farah Aleem filed for divorce in a Maryland court, her husband, Irfan Aleem, without notice to Farah, went to the Pakistani embassy in Washington and performed talaq by executing a written document that recited "I divorce thee" three times. Under Pakistani law, unless agreed otherwise, the wife has no claim to property owned by her husband on the date of divorce. In her Maryland divorce action, Farah sought to have Irfan's World Bank pension and other assets declared marital property. Pointing to a provision in Maryland's constitution (Declaration of Rights, Art. 46) that assures equal rights to men and women, the court reasoned that:

the enforceability of a foreign talaq divorce provision, such as that presented here, in the courts of Maryland, where only the male, i.e., husband, has an independent right to utilize talaq and the wife may utilize it only with the husband’s permission, is contrary to Maryland’s constitutional provisions....

The court concluded that:

talaq divorce of countries applying Islamic law, unless substantially modified, is contrary to the public policy of this state... where, in the absence of valid agreements otherwise, ... marital property is subject to fair and equitable division.... Additionally, a procedure that permits a man (and him only unless he agrees otherwise) to evade a divorce action begun in this State by rushing to the embassy of a country recognizing talaq and ... summarily terminate the marriage and deprive his wife of marital property, confers insufficient due process to his wife. Accordingly, for this additional reason the courts of Maryland shall not recognize the talaq divorce performed here.

The court observed in an introductory footnote: "we address Islamic law only to the extent it is also the civil law of a country. The viability of Islamic law as a religious canon is not intended to be affected." Today's Baltimore Sun, reporting on the decision, notes that the assets involved in the case total $2 million.

Montreal Cabbie Files Human Rights Complaint Over Religious Items

Today's Montreal Gazette reports that Montreal cabbie Arieh Perecowicz has filed a complaint with the Quebec Human Rights Commission challenging a Montreal Taxi Bureau bylaw that bans any "object or inscription that is not required for the taxi to be in service." Perecowicz, who is Jewish, has two mezuzahs embedded in the posts between the front and rear seats of his cab. He also has photos of his daughter and the founder of the Chabad Lubavitch movement as well as a Remembrance Day poppy in the taxi. His complaint asks for $5,000 in damages, alleging that the Montreal bylaw infringes his freedom of expression as guaranteed by the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. Next month, Perecowicz will ask a Montreal municipal court judge to postpone ruling on his four citations-- each fining him $191-- for violating the Taxi Bureau bylaw until the Human Rights Commission rules in his case. Perecowicz suggests that the fines are related to his appearance on television with other drivers complaining that the Taxi Bureau was not enforcing its rules against unlicensed cabs.

Ohio School Is Divided Over Support Of Science Teacher

Yesterday's Mt. Vernon (OH) News reports on the peer pressure at Mt. Vernon Middle School for students to support controversial science teacher John Freshwater. As reported previously, Freshwater is defying a directive that he remove a Bible that he keeps on his desk in view of his students. The community has become sharply divided over support of the teacher. Parent Christine Hamilton says her two sons have been harassed because they are friends with the boy whose parents filed the complaint against Freshwater. Meanwhile, a separate investigation is under way of an minor injury suffered by a student during Freshwater's science class. The injury was apparently caused by some kind of electrostatic device. (Mt. Vernon News). [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Israel Bible Quiz Finalist Is A Messianic, Stirring Intense Controversy

In Israel, the state-run International Bible Quiz, sponsored jointly by the army and the Education Ministry, is a highlight of each Independence Day celebration. Jewish Agency representatives in 30 countries organize regional competitions to select teenagers who will take part in the final rounds. The Forward yesterday reported that as Israel's 60th birthday approaches on Thursday, an intense battle has broken out over whether 17-year old Bat-El Levy, one of Israel's four finalists, should be permitted to continue to compete. Contest rules limit participation to those who are Jewish. Levy, it turns out, is from a messianic Jewish family. Messianics are considered to be Christians by most Jews. However the teenager is listed as Jewish in her state identification papers. Also her mother is Jewish, so she meets the strict halachic (Jewish Law) definition of who is a Jew. Attorneys for the Bible Quiz say there is no basis to challenge her Jewishness.

Messianics claim they are subject to constant prejudice in Israel. They say that the anti-missionary organization, Yad L'Achim, is particularly attempting to marginalize them. After Bible Quiz authorities refused to disqualify Levy, a dozen influential rabbis issued a statement calling for contestants and spectators to boycott the Bible contest. In a related development, last month 12 Messianics whose fathers were Jewish, but whose mothers were not, were granted Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return. (See prior posting.)

Tennessee AG OK's Bible Park Financing Under State, But Not Federal, Law

Tennessee's Attorney General, Robert Cooper, issued an opinion yesterday ruling that Tennessee law permits the use of public funds to support the development of Bible Park USA, but left open the question of whether public funding for the theme park would violate the Establishment Clause of the federal constitution. Yesterday's Murfreesboro Daily News Journal and Legal Newsline report that Bible Park USA developers and Rutherford County Mayor Ernest Burgess have proposed a possible tax-increment financing arrangement that would allocate most of the property tax revenue from the park and a 5% privilege tax on sales inside the park to pay down bonds issued to finance construction. (See prior related posting.)

Canadian Court Says Diocese and Congregations Must Share Properties

In Canada, a number of parishes, upset over issues such as same-sex unions, have voted to break away from the Anglican Church of Canada. Yesterday's Toronto Globe and Mail reports on an Ontario Superior Court ruling issued on Monday holding that three break-away parishes and the diocese must share possession of church properties until the court makes a final ruling on who is entitled to ownership. The three parishes involved are St. George's Anglican Church in Lowville, St. Hilda's Anglican Church in Oakville, and the Church of Good Shepherd in St. Catharines. Some lawyers say that a final decision on ownership of these properties could be years away.

China Objects To USCIRF's Report

China yesterday strongly criticized the annual report issued earlier this week by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. The report lists China as one of the eleven most oppressive "countries of particular concern". According to Xinhua, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang yesterday said:

[T]he Chinese government protects its citizens' freedom of religious belief according to the laws and Chinese citizens ... enjoy full freedom of religious belief protected by law. We advise the USCIRF to seriously examine the United States' own problems and stop interfering in other countries' internal affairs under the pretext of religion....

Liberty Counsel Launching Campaign To Support Graduation Prayer

Liberty Counsel today announced the launch of its annual "Friend or Foe" Graduation Prayer Campaign. It says that its goal is to "ensure that prayer and religious viewpoints are not suppressed during graduation ceremonies." It has again made available online its "Legal Memorandum on Graduation Prayers in Public Schools". The memo outlines the possibility of prayers being offered by students or speakers on their own initiative where they have been chosen to speak on the basis of religiously neutral criteria. It also reviews the possibility of privately-sponsored graduation ceremonies or baccalaureate services. Liberty Counsel is also more generally encouraging students to wear its red "I Will Pray" wristbands to school.

Indian, Pakistani Muftis Argue Over Muslim Compliance With Indian Law

Wednesday's Pakistan Daily Times reports on competing declarations by Muslim clerics on the propriety of Muslims in India slaughtering cows and eating beef. Mufti Habibur Rehman, head of India’s large Darul Uloom Deoband madrassa, told a resident of the Indian town of Muzaffarnagar that while eating beef is legal under Islamic law, it is prohibited by Indian law because of the beliefs of the predomninant Hindu population. Therefore, Rehman said, for Muslims in India, it is not right to secretly slaughter and eat the meat of cows. Pakistan's Mufti Abdul Rehman Al Rehmani (head of Darul Ifta wa Al-Qazzath of the Jamaat-ud-Dawa Pakistan) however disagrees. He argues that telling Indian Muslims to comply with Indian law in this regard will encourage them to accept Hindu beliefs. He says that if democratic India's minorities fear to follow their own religions, "then the peace of the whole world will be in great danger."

West Virginia Town Moves From Lord's Prayer To Moment of Silence

The Charles Town, West Virginia City Council on Monday night voted 7-1 to open its meetings with a moment of silence instead of the Lord's Prayer which it had recited for decades before city council meetings. The move came after a Jewish resident of the city raised questions about use of the Lord's Prayer. Today's Martinsburg (WV) Journal reports that council member Geraldine Willingham was the only dissenting vote after two other members who earlier voted to keep the Lord's Prayer went along with the moment of silence proposal. Willingham complained that the change was made because of "one negative person".

US Rights Agency Hears Witnesses On Religious Discrimination In Prisons

The U.S. Civil Rights Commission has recently posted online the full transcript of its Feb. 8 Briefing on Religious Discrimination In Prisons. The first panel focused on Free Exercise of Inmates' Religious Rights vs. Prison Security. Speakers were: Chaplain Joseph Pryor (Federal Bureau of Prisons); Steven T. McFarland (Justice Department's Task Force for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives); Carol Atkins (Warden of Maryland Correctional Institution); Frank Cilluffo (Director of GWU's Homeland Security Policy Institute); and Gregory Saathoff (Univ. Virginia's Critical Incident Analysis Group).

The second panel covered Free Exercise of Inmates' Religious Rights vs. Church State Separation. Speakers were Patrick Nolan (Justice Fellowship of Chuck Colson's Prison Fellowship Ministries); Lane Dilg (ACLU); Imam Abuquadir Al-Amin (Society of American Muslims); Alex Luchenitser (Americans United for Separation of Church and State); Chaplain Gary Friedman (B'nai B'rith International Pastoral Care Agency for Jewish Prisoners and Their Families); and Reverend Patrick McCollum (National Correctional and Chaplaincy Directors Association).

US Civil Rights Commission Chairman Gerald Reynolds said: "The testimony and materials gathered as a part of this briefing will become part of the 2008 Statutory Report enforcing prohibitions of religious discrimination in prisons."

Paper Reports On Clergy Clash In Break-Away Episcopal Church

While numerous reports have chronicled the progress of litigation between the Episcopal Church and break-away congregations wishing to affiliate with more conservative Anglican convocations, Saturday's Hartford Courant furnishes a different perspective. In an article titled Episcopalian Split Comes Down To Locked Groton Church, the paper reports on the experience of Rev. David Cannon who was appointed by the Episcopal Church to take over leadership of Bishop Seabury Church in Groton, CT. Rev. Ronald Gauss, the church's existing leader, whose move to the Convocation of Anglican Churches in North America is supported by church members, refused to turn over church keys or its books to Rev. Cannon. This, like numerous other cases, is lkely to end up in litigation over who owns the church property.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Terrero v. United States, (11th Cir., April 29, 2008), the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected claims by a Jewish prisoner that his rights under the 1st Amendment and RFRA were violated when federal prison officials failed to provide him with the means to celebrate the festival of Sukkot, failed to provide him with challah bread instead of matzah crackers, and failed to contract with a rabbi to provide religious services. The Columbus (GA) Ledger-Enquirer reported on the decision last week.

In Starr v. Cox, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34708 (D NH, April 28, 2008), a New Hampshire federal district court dismissed a prisoner's RLUIPA and 1st Amendment claims. It held that even though plaintiff raised a question of material fact as to whether the practice of Tai Chi, separate from Taoism, is part of a system of religious belief, and as to whether his beliefs are sincerely held, plaintiff failed to show that his religious exercise was substantially burdened. Even if they were, defendants demonstrated that the prison's Tai Chi restrictions serve a compelling state interest using the least restrictive means.

In Rhodes v. Alameida, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35764 (ED CA, May 1, 2008), a California federal magistrate judge rejected free exercise, equal protection and due process challenges by a Native American inmate to the prison's confiscation and disposal of certain contraband property that plaintiff claimed had religious or spiritual significance to him.

Israel Funds Construction of Reform Synagogue For First Time

The Jerusalem Post reports on yesterday's scheduled ground breaking for the first Reform synagogue funded by the Israeli government. Until now, only Orthodox synagogues could receive state funds. The Conservative and Reform Jewish movements are not officially recognized by Israel's rabbinate. In the past some municipalities had set aside land for non-Orthodox synagogues, but this is the first funding for construction. Money for the prefab that will house Modi'in's Yozma Reform Congregation came as the result of a compromise after a lawsuit was filed against Modi'in's Construction and Housing Ministry by the Israel Religious Action Center. It claimed that the Ministry's planned allocation of state funds for religious institutions was discriminatory. In the settlement, IRAC agreed to drop the lawsuit and construction and housing minister Isaac Herzog agreed to furnish the new building. IRAC says it doubts whether funds for additional Reform synagogues will be forthcoming because recently the Religious Affairs Ministry was reinstituted and its head is a member of the Orthodox Shas party. [Thanks to Religion and State In Israel for the lead.]

State Department Suggesting Diplomats Change Language In Describing Islamic Terrorists

The AP reported last week on a memo titled Words That Work and Words That Don't: A Guide for Counterterrorism Communication that was originally prepared in March by the Extremist Messaging Branch at the National Counter Terrorism Center and was approved for diplomatic use last month by the State Department. It grows out recommendations from American Muslim leaders on how to describe terrorists who invoke Islamic theology in justifying their attacks. Those recommendations built on three premises: "(1) We should not demonize all Muslim or Islam; (2) Because the terrorists themselves use theology and religious terms to justify both their means and ends, the terms we use must be accurate and descriptive; and (3) Our words should be strategic; we must be conscious of history, culture, and context. In an era where a statement can cross continents in a manner of seconds, it is essential that officials consider how terms translate: and how they will resonate with a variety of audiences." The Investigative Project on Terrorism on Friday published an opinion piece by Steve Emerson who is critical of the memos.

Ohio Supreme Court Upholds Property Tax Exemption For Episcopal School Property

In Episcopal School of Cincinnati v. Levin, (Ohio Sup. Ct., March 12, 2008), the Ohio Supreme Court held that the Episcopal Diocese of Southern Ohio was entitled to a property tax exemption for the year 2001 for property it acquired to use for a church-affiliated inner-city school so long as on Jan. 1 of that year it intended to use the property for tax exempt purposes. The exemption for the year was not lost even though later in the year before the application for exemption was filed it appeared that the Diocese would likely not be able to complete the financial arrangements to develop the school. The property was sold off to a for-profit entity late in 2002. Justice Lanzinger dissented. A Supreme Court press release summarizes the decision.

Catholic Paper In Malaysia Wins Initial Court Victory

In Malaysia, the Catholic newspaper The Herald has won an initial victory in its challenge to a government claim that it may not use "Allah" as a synonym for God in its Malay-language reporting. Today's International Herald Tribune reports that High Court Judge Lau Bee Lan rejected the prosecutor's claim that the challenge is frivolous. The government argues that use of "Allah" by Christians might confuse Muslims. The Herald says that "Allah" is an Arabic word that has been used more generally for centuries to mean "God" in Malay. (See prior related posting.) In a separate case, the Sabah Evangelical Church of Borneo has also filed suit after officials last year banned its import of books containing the word "Allah".

Recent Scholarly Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Andrew M.M. Koppelman, Phony Originalism and the Establishment Clause, (Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 08-15, April 25 2008).


• Patrick McKinley Brennan, Differentiating Church and State (Without Losing the Church),(Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Forthcoming).


• Brian J. Bilford, Harper's Bazaar: The Marketplace of Ideas and Hate Speech in Schools, Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Vol. 4, 2008).

The electronic journal, Law & Ethics of Human Rights, Vol. 1, 2007 has recently appeared through Bepress. Among the articles of interest in this issue devoted to Multiculturalism & the Anti-discrimination Principle are:

• Nancy L. Rosenblum, Banning Parties: Religious and Ethnic Partisanship in Multicultural Democracies.


• Rajeev Bhargava, On the Persistent Political Under-Representation of Muslims in India.


• Alon Harel, Regulating Modesty-Related Practices.


• Tzvia Greenfield, Is It Really so Benign? Gender Separation in Ultra Orthodox Bus Lines.


• Moshe Cohen-Eliya, Is Conditional Funding a Less Drastic Means?.


• Stephen Macedo, In Defense of Conditional Funding of Religious Schools.


• Iddo Porat, On the Jehovah's Witnesses Cases, Balancing Tests, and Three Kinds of Multicultural Claims.

From SmartCILP:

• Symposium. Gender Relevant Legislative Changes in Muslim and Non-Muslim Countries. Table of Contents, 64 Washington & Lee Law Review 1291-1568 (2007).

Jewish Parents In Plano, TX Say Students Harassed To Take New Testament

The Plano, Texas School District finds its policy of granting all outside groups equal access to unstaffed distribution tables at schools under attack. Saturday's Dallas Morning News reports that parents of some Jewish students at Vines High School say their children were pressured and taunted by other students to pick up a copy of the Gideons' New Testament. School officials have talked to students about tolerance, but have not disciplined anyone for making comments to the Jewish students such as "if the Bible touched you ... would you burn...?" Some parents have suggested that the schools limit display tables to quieter areas such as the library or classrooms. Others have urged the school to warn them when Christian displays are being set up.

Kentucky 10 Commandments Case Appealed To 6th Circuit

In the latter part of April a notice of appeal to the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals was filed in ACLU of Kentucky v. Grayson County, Kentucky, a case in which a Kentucky federal district court permanently enjoined a display of the Ten Commandments as part of a Foundations of American Law and Government Display in the Grayson County (KY) Courthouse. (See prior posting.) On Thursday, The Record (Grayson County) reported that Liberty Counsel has agreed to argue the appeal at no cost to the county. Meanwhile the courthouse continues to display an empty frame where the Ten Commandments had been, while retaining the other documents in the display. The Ten Commandment Defense group has put up seven highway billboards showing the Ten Commandments, and more than 150 local businesses have agreed to display the Ten Commandments to protest their removal from the courthouse.

Turkish Schools In Pakistan Offer Moderate Islamic Alternative

Today's New York Times carries a front page article titled Turkish Schools Offer Pakistan a Gentler Vision of Islam. It reports on a group of Turkish educators-- offering an alternative to both public schools and madrasas-- who have:

an entirely different vision of Islam. Theirs is moderate and flexible, comfortably coexisting with the West while remaining distinct from it. Like Muslim Peace Corps volunteers, they promote this approach in schools, which are now established in more than 80 countries, Muslim and Christian....

They prescribe a strong Western curriculum, with courses, taught in English.... They do not teach religion beyond the one class in Islamic studies that is required by the state.... [H]owever, they encourage Islam in their dormitories, where teachers set examples in lifestyle and prayer....

The model is the brainchild of a Turkish Islamic scholar, Fethullah Gulen... Moderate as that sounds, some Turks say Mr. Gulen uses the schools to advance his own political agenda.

Illinois Man Seeks "In God We Trust" As New Name

Zion, Illinois school bus driver and amateur artist Steve Kreuscher is asking an Illinois court to permit him to legally change his name to "In God" [first name] "We Trust" [last name]. Yesterday's Chicago Daily Herald reports that the 57-year old says: "Those words are an endangered species. You might take it off the money, but you can't take away my name." A hearing on the name change is scheduled in a Lake County court on June 13. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

West Virginia High Court Rejects Challenge To Prosecutor's Biblical References

In State of West Virginia v. Keesecker, (WV Sup. Ct. App., April 25, 2008) West Virginia's Supreme Court of Appeals rejected a claim by a defendant who had been convicted on six counts of sexual assault that her convictions should be reversed because the trial judge permitted the prosecutor to refer to biblical theory and examples during closing argument. Because no objection was made at trial to the comments, the court could reverse only under the "plain error doctrine". The court said:

The essence of the prosecutor's biblical citations ... involved the prosecutor's perception of the jury's role as the "Throne of Judgment" and the judge's role as the "Throne of Mercy." ...[T]he prosecutor cited various Old Testament characters and the judgments allegedly made by God upon their actions. Because this Court cannot conclude that the prosecutor's biblical references impacted the Appellant's substantial rights and seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings, we decline to utilize the plain error doctrine....

The court however did reverse appellant's conviction and remand for a new trial on other grounds. Friday's Bluefield (WV) Daily Telegraph discusses the case.

Recent Develpments In the FLDS Child Custody Case

Carey Cockerell, the Texas Commissioner of Family and Protective Services, testified before the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services last Wednesday on developments and challenges in the handling of children taken into foster care after the raid of the FLDS ranch in Eldorado, Texas. A recording of the full hearing is available from the Senate's website. The previously scheduled hearing was to focus on needs of the Department, on the foster care system and on preventing child abuse. The Department of Family and Protective Services posted on its website a release summarizing the Commissioner's testimony, as well as a follow-up letter to the chairman of the committee. DFPS has also posted a "Model for Care" for the FLDS children and a "Cultural Awareness Guide" for caregivers. Saturday's Deseret News discusses the Cultural Awareness Guide.

Last Thursday, Tom Green County District Court released a document titled the Bishop's Record that contains the names, ages and locations for many of the FLDS men, women and children. An article in Friday's San Angelo Standard-Times discusses the document and also contains a sidebar with links to all the court document that have so far been released in the case.Texas DFPS has posted on its website a breakdown by age and gender of the 464 FLDS children. The website also contains a chronology of the investigation and a Frequently Asked Questions document.

Meanwhile Cardozo Law School professor Marci Hamilton published an article on FindLaw contending that the due process and religious freedom arguments raised by FLDS members lack merit.

Israel's Supreme Rabbinical Court Invalidates Conversions Performed By Two Rabbis

In Israel, the tensions between those who want impose strict conversion standards on individuals seeking to become Jews and those who opt for somewhat more liberal standards have again surfaced in a decision of the Supreme Rabbinical Court last week. YNet News and My Obiter Dicta blog report that the Court has ruled all conversions performed since 1999 by Rabbis Chaim Drukman and Chaim Avior are invalid. As reported by Haaretz, the two rabbis in question operate a special conversion court at Or Etzion Yeshiva . The special courts were created to speed up the conversion process. They are responsible directly to the Prime Minister's Office and the government's chief rabbis. These special courts have been opposed by the ultra-Orthodox (haredi) Bet Din (religious court) system. The ruling came in the context of a divorce proceeding originating in the Ashdod Rabbinical Court, but the decision will affect many converts. The decision is likely to be appealed to Israel's High Court of Justice for final resolution.

UPDATE: Monday's Jerusalem Post reported that Chief Sephardi Rabbi Shlomo Amar assured the thousands of affected converts on Sunday that their conversions would continue to be recognized by the rabbinic establishment. Apparently Amar had expressly ordered the judges not to publish the opinion. Others, however, say that the charges leveled by the Supreme Rabbinical Court against Rabbi Chaim Drukman are so serious that his conversions will inevitably be called into question. The court accused Druckman of intentionally violating Jewish law, lying, and forging official rabbinic documents. The Jerusalem Post also reports that the Public Petitions Committee of the Knesset will hold an emergency meeting Monday to discuss the issue.

UPDATE: Tuesday's Jerusalem Post publishes an analysis of the ideological split involved in the conversion dispute. It views it as a clash between religious Zionist and haredi rabbis.

Iranian Artist In Europe Gets Death Threats From Home

A fatwa urging the killing of Iranian artist Sooreh Hera, who now lives in the Netherlands, has been published in Iranian newspapers, according to Fox News today. The death threats came after the artist attempted to display her photos of gay men titled "Adam & Ewald, Seventh-Day Lovers." Some of the photos include depictions of the Prophet Muhammad and his son-in-law Ali. Art Amsterdam, a Dutch art festival, has now agreed to show Hera's work next month, but only if the photos of partly undressed men wearing masks of Ali and Muhammad are excluded. Hera has called on the Dutch Ministry of Culture to give protection to controversial art and artists.

Britain Approves Shariah Compliant Insurance Company

Britain's Financial Services Authority has, for the first time, granted regulatory approval to an independent insurance company that will offer Shariah-compliant home and auto insurance. Financial Advice reported on Friday that Principle Insurance will now be able to offer Britain's 2 million Muslims insurance products that do not compromise their religious beliefs. The blog Islam in Europe explains details of the insurance products that the company will provide.

Anti-Evolution Film Makers Sued for Copyright Violations

The AP reported last week that producers of the already controversial film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed are now being sued by Yoko Ono who claims that the film violates copyright laws by using portions of John Lennon's song Imagine in the movie. While the production company Premise Media says that it is protected under the fair use doctrine, Ono's lawsuit says that the way the song is listed in the film's credits inaccurately suggests to viewers that the producers had permission to use it. (Background from Wall Street Journal, April 16). The film's premise as set out by it producers is that "educators and scientists are being ridiculed, denied tenure and even fired – for the 'crime' of merely believing that there might be evidence of 'design' in nature, and that perhaps life is not just the result of accidental, random chance." On Friday, the Fair Use Project of Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society announced that it will defend Premise Media in the lawsuit.

Court Says Employer Has Burden Under Title VII To Attempt Accommodation

In EEOC v. Texas Hydraulics, Inc., (ED TN, April 16, 2008), a Tennessee federal district court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment in a Title VII religious discrimination lawsuit. Keith Vogeler, a production employee, would not work from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday for religious reasons. Vogeler was dismissed by Texas Hydraulics after refusing to work on seven different Saturdays. The court held that, under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the employer has the burden of showing that it offered the employee a reasonable accommodation or at least considered possible options that would have accommodated an employee and that these options were rejected because they would have caused an undue hardship. Here Texas Hydraulics offered no evidence that it attempted to find a reasonable accommodation. The case is discussed in last Monday's BNA Corporate Law Daily [subscription required].

USCIRF Issues Its 2008 Report on International Religious Freedom

Today the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom announced release of its 2008 Annual Report (full text) recommending eleven countries be designated as "countries of particular concern"-- those that are are most restrictive of religious freedom. The countries on the list are: Burma, North Korea, Eritrea, Iran, Pakistan, China, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam. The Report also includes a Watch List of countries that require close monitoring, though which are less oppressive that the CPCs. Those on the Watch List are Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Cuba, Egypt, Indonesia, and Nigeria. The Commission is postponing its recommendations as to Iraq pending a Commission visit to the country later this month. This compromise was approved after a sharp party-line split among Commissioners over the draft chapter in the report on Iraq. (New York Sun). USCIRF's recommendations are made pursuant to provisions of the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act. This year's recommendations largely mirror those in last year's report. USCIRF's recommendations go to the State Department for its use in preparing its annual report on international religious freedom. [Thanks to Blog from the Capital for the lead.]

New Appeal Filed By FLDS Mothers In Attempt To Regain Custody of Children

On Wednesday, attorneys for 38 mothers of children taken from the FLDS Ranch in Eldorado, Texas filed an an Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus (full text) with a Texas state appellate court seeking return of their children. The case is captioned In re Sara Steed, et. al. (TX 3d Ct. App.). The new petition argues that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to return the children to their mothers and in denying them visitation rights.

Today's Ft. Worth Star Telegram says the petition argues that the children should not have been removed from their mothers without evidence the mothers pose an immediate physical danger to the children. It alleges that mere fear of a dangerous culture or mindset is insufficient to justify removal. Yesterday's Deseret News reports the petition suggests that the mothers and children could be ordered to live together off the FLDS compound while the state is investigating. Since the FLDS men are the alleged abusers, they could be ordered off the YFZ Ranch or protective orders barring the men from contact with the women and children could be issued. (See prior related posting.)

6th Circuit Rejects Amish Challenge to Septic Tank Requirements

In Beechy v. Central Michigan District Health Department, (6th Cir., April 23, 2008), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals rather summarily affirmed a district court decision rejecting free exercise and RLUIPA claims by Amish defendants who objected to septic tank size requirements. The Amish claimed that installing larger tanks would incur wasteful expenses and tempt them to install modern conveniences in their homes, such as bathrooms. The court held that challengers had not shown any "substantial burden" on a religious practice. It also upheld the trial court's denial of plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint and allege a new state law claim under Michigan's Right to Farm Act.

Indian Tribe Faction Asserts Religious Rights To Support Land Takeover

In Wisconsin, a Lac Du Flambeau tribal court is being asked to grant a restraining order and an injunction to prevent law enforcement officials from removing members of the Ginew faction of the tribe from a piece of tribal land they have taken over in protest against financial activities of the Tribal Council. The Rhinelander Daily News yesterday reported that the dissident Ginew faction has erected a large tent on the occupied land and constructed a sacred fire inside. Relying on this, the dissidents say that now their First Amendment rights and their rights under the Native American Free Exercise of Religion Act would be violated if they are removed from the land.

Court Finds Church-State Problems With University Training Manual

In Sklar v. Clough, (ND GA, April 29, 2008), a Georgia federal district court found substantial problems with material included in a training manual used in Georgia Institute of Technology's "Safe Space" program. Safe Space is designed to create a supportive environment on campus for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students. In an 84-page opinion, the court focused on material dealing with the views of various religious groups regarding homosexuality. It held that inclusion of this material violates the Establishment Clause by favoring some religious beliefs over others.

In the opinion the court also dismissed claims regarding use of student activity fees because there had not been adequate proof of the responsibility of the specific named defendants. However the court suggested that a suit against proper defendants could well be successful. It said the school's policy against funding religious activities with student fees is administered in a manner that "is whimsical and would appear to exceed even an arbitrary and capricious standard." Alliance Defense Fund yesterday issued a release reporting on the court's decision. Also the Atlanta Journal Constitution and Inside Higher Education both report on it. (See prior related posting.)

Suit Challenging Limits On School Art Projects Settled

Yesterday's Wausau (WI) Daily Herald reports that the parties have agreed in principle to a settlement in A.P. v. Tomah Area School District, a case in which a Tomah High School student challenged a school policy that prohibits art class projects from depicting "violence, blood, sexual connotations, [or] religious beliefs." The school says the policy was intended to keep satanic or gang symbols and other "negative expression" out of student artwork. However, in this case a student was denied credit for a project in which he included a cross and a reference to a Biblical verse. (See prior posting.) Under the agreed upon settlement, students will still be prohibited from depicting gang symbols, violence, blood and sex. However, they will be permitted to express their religious beliefs in their art projects so long as inclusion of religious content satisfies the assignment criteria.

9th Circuit Keeps Injunction Against Pharmacy Board Rules In Place

Yesterday in Stormans Inc. v. Selecky, (9th Cir., May 1, 2008), in a 2-1 decision the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to stay a preliminary injunction that the district court had entered barring enforcement of Washington State Pharmacy Board regulations against plaintiff, a religious objector to dispensing the "morning after" (Plan B) pill. The challenged regulations require pharmacists to fill all prescriptions even if doing so violates their religious beliefs. (See prior posting.) The majority said that even if the district court was wrong in concluding that the Pharmacy Board regulations violate the Free Exercise clause, there is insufficient evidence that intervenors who sought the stay will face irreparable harm if the injunction remains in effect pending appeal. The injunction requires that a pharmacist who refuses to fill a prescription for Plan B must refer the customer to a nearby source for it.

Judge Tashima wrote a lengthy dissent concluding that appellants had a strong likelihood of success on the merits. Therefore so long as there was a possibility of irreparable harm, particularly in light of the public interest involved, the preliminary injunction should have been stayed. Reuters and Life News both report on the 9th Circuit decision.

Queen's Grandson Keeps Place In Succession As His Fiancee Converts

Britain's Act of Settlement of 1701 requires the monarch to be a member of the Church of England and excludes from the position of king or queen any member of the royal family who has married a Catholic. Agence France-Presse reports today that Queen Elizabeth II's eldest grandson, Peter Mark Andrew Phillips, can remain as eleventh in line for the throne. His fiancee, Autumn Kelly (who he will marry later this month) has converted from Catholicism to the Church of England. Peter Phillips is the oldest child of Princess Anne from her marriage to Captain Mark Phillips. Today's Scotsman says that this development has renewed calls for repeal of the Act of Settlement. (See prior posting).

Times Explores Obama-Wright Relationship

This morning's New York Times carries an interesting article on Barack Obama's relationship with his former pastor Jeremiah Wright, and the eventual rift between them. It says: "Theirs was a long and painful falling out, marked by a degree of mutual incomprehension."

Danish Party Opposes Muslim Magistrates Wearing of Head Scarves

According to a story today from Agence France-Presse, Danish authorities last December authorized Muslim magistrates to wear headscarves in their courtrooms. Now that this has been recently disclosed, Denmark's right-wing DPP party is launching a series of newspaper ads opposing the practice. The ads call headscarves a "veil of tyranny". Justice Minister Lene Espersen suggested that new rules might be adopted that would ban judges from wearing any religious symbol that could impair the neutrality of the court. This would include Christian crosses as well as Muslim head scarves.

Today's National Day of Prayer Is Surrounded by Controversy

Today is National Day of Prayer (see prior posting), and controversies surround it. Jews on First reports that its campaign for an "Inclusive National Day of Prayer" has failed. Its website says: "Almost all of the governors ... have issued National Day of Prayer proclamations to the National Day of Prayer Task Force, a group linked to Focus on the Family.... even though we informed the governors that the Task Force practices religious discrimination." (See related prior posting.)

Meanwhile, yesterday the Public Record reported that at least six active duty military officers (chaplains and others) have been working closely with the National Day of Prayer Task Force as coordinators of events at military installations. The application that coordinators must sign states in part: "I agree to ... ensure a strong, consistent Christian message throughout the nation. I commit that NDP activities I serve with will be conducted solely by Christians while those with differing beliefs are welcome to attend." This may raise Establishment Clause issues.

Alliance Defense Fund says that its "attorneys sent an informational letter last week to nearly 1,200 of the nation's largest cities, advising them of their constitutional right to recognize and participate in the 2008 National Day of Prayer...."

In Washington, DC, the 90-hour long U.S. Capitol Bible Reading Marathon, held on the steps of the nation's Capitol, comes to an end today. In the afternoon, there will be a Pastors and Church Leaders Gathering at the Cannon House Office Building and in the evening there will be a Public Prayer and Unity Assembly on the West Lawn of the Capitol. (Details). Usually the White House has its own separate National Day of Prayer ceremony. (See 2007 Day of Prayer posting.)

UPDATE: This morning, the White House hosted its own National Day of Prayer ceremony-- as it has done for the last 8 years. A video of the entire ceremony is available from the White House website. The ceremony was opened by NDP Task Force Chair Shirley Dobson who announced all sorts of prayer events taking place around the country, including private pilots and their passengers flying near state capitols in every state, and a "pray for election day" initiative. President Bush spoke at the event (transcript), which included Jewish as well as a variety of Christian participants.

Truck Owner Says Town Is Discriminating Against His Religious Speech

WWNYTV News on Tuesday reported that a contractor in Gouverneur, New York is challenging a citation he received for violating the town's billboard ordinance (full text , see Sec. 17.N.). Dan Burritt has parked a large semi-trailer on his property and put up religious messages on both sides of it. The town says this is in reality a billboard that requires a permit. Burritt's lawyers, however, say that the town is singling out religious speech because another semi-trailer with a drug company logo on it is parked beside a town road and no citation has been issued claiming that it violates the billboard law. The WWNYTV story includes photos of the two trucks. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Attorneys Fees Awarded In RLUIPA Case That Resulted In Nominal Damage Award

In Layman Lessons v. City of Millersville, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34996 (MD TN, April 29, 2008), a Tennessee federal district court, in a religious land use case, awarded plaintiff Layman Lessons nearly $60,000 in attorneys fees and costs. The court said: "the fact that Layman Lessons originally sought compensatory damages but was ultimately only awarded $ 2.00 in nominal damages does not mean in this particular case that its success was merely technical or de minimis. Even though the damages award was minimal, Layman Lessons achieved its primary objective: the vindication of its rights." In the case (see prior posting) the court found that the initial denial of an occupancy permit for commercially zoned property to a Christian ministry imposed a substantial burden on its exercise of religion and violated RLUIPA. The court also found a due process violation in the enforcement of an inapplicable buffer-strip zoning ordinance to prevent use of the land by the ministry that was formed to aid the homeless.

New Mexico Removes 3 Minors From Cult's Strong City Compound

The AP reported yesterday that New Mexico authorities have removed two girls and a boy-- all under age 18-- from the "Strong City" compound of The Lord Our Righteousness Church near Clayton, NM. The children are currently in state custody. The move took place after allegations of inappropriate contact between the three minors and the church's leader Wayne Bent (also known as Michael Travesser). In a statement on the group's website, Travesser says there has never been sex with minors.

Shi'ites In Saudi Arabia Unhappy With Removal of Court Head

In Saudi Arabia, tensions have erupted between the dominant conservative Sunnis and the minority Shi'ites who live mainly in Qatif and al-Ahsa in the Eastern Province. Yesterday's Khaleej Times reports that the recent removal of Sheikh Mohammed al-Obaidan as head of the Shi'a court in Qatif is seen by Shi'as as an attempt to subordinate their court system to Sunni judicial authorities. The current 10 judges staffing Shi'ite courts are insufficient to serve the growing Shi'ite population. So some Shi'ites have been forced to use Sunni courts.

School District Sued For Permitting Free Use of Buildings By Religious Groups

The Freedom from Religion Foundation has filed suit (press release) against the Rio (WI) Community School District and the Wisconsin state Superintendent of Public Instruction challenging the Rio district's policy of allowing all local non-profit groups to use school buildings after school hours free of charge. The schools also post information from the non-profits on school bulletin boards and send home information about events with school children. The complaint (full text) in Freedom from Religion Foundation v. Burmaster, (Dane Co. Cir. Ct., filed 4/25/08) alleges that inclusion of religious groups, including the Child Evangelism Fellowship, in this policy violates the Wisconsin state Constitution. Art. I, Sec. 18 prohibits the use of state funds for the benefit of religious groups, and Art. I, Sec. 24 permits the legislature to authorize the use of public school buildings by civic, religious or charitable organizations during nonschool hours, but only upon payment by the organization of reasonable usage fees. Today's Portage Daily Register reports on the lawsuit.

UPDATE: The full text of correspondence between the Freedom from Religion Foundation and the Rio School District has been posted online by the Portage Daily Register.

Canadian Christian Social Service Agency Barred From Enforcing Lifestyle Code

In Heintz v. Christian Horizons, 2008 HRTO 22 (April 15, 2008), the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal held that a non-profit group, Christian Horizons, is not entitled to an exemption from the sexual orientation non-discrimination provisions of the Ontario Human Rights Code. Section 24(1)(a) of the Code provides that the right to equal treatment in employment is not infringed when a "religious ... organization that is primarily engaged in serving the interests of persons identified by their ... creed... employs only ... persons similarly identified if the qualification is a reasonable and bona fide qualification because of the nature of the employment." Christian Horizons operates Christian residences for developmentally disabled children. It is the largest community living service provider in the province and receives $75 million per year in government funding.

Connie Heintz, a support worker at a Christian Horizons residential facility was told she would be terminated because she was not in compliance with the organization's Lifestyle and Morality Statement which, among other things, prohibits staff from engaging in homosexual relationships. The Tribunal held the Sec. 24(1)(a) exemption inapplicable because "the primary object and mission of Christian Horizons is to provide care and support for individuals who have developmental disabilities, without regard to their creed." Nor is the employment requirement a reasonable qualification because of the nature of Heintz's employment. The Tribunal went on to find that "Independent of whether Christian Horizons has met the conditions for the exemption under section 24(1)(a), [it] ... has infringed Ms. Heintz’s rights under the Code as a result of the work environment and how she was treated once her sexual orientation came to light."

The Tribunal in its lengthy opinion awarded Heintz damages of $23,000 plus lost wages and benefits. It also ordered Christian Horizons to cease imposing its Lifestyle and Morality Statement as a condition of employment and ordered it to adopt an anti-discrimination and an anti-harassment policy as well as a human rights training program for all its employees. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Cardinal Says Giuliani Should Not Have Received Communion During Pope's Visit

New York's Cardinal Edward Egan says that former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani should not have received Holy Communion during the Pope Benedict XVI's recent visit to the U.S. Yesterday's Washington Post reports that Egan had "an understanding" with Giuliani that he was not to receive the Eucharist because of Giuliani's support of abortion rights.

Belarus Petitioners Fined Under Legislative Initiative Law

In Belarus, according to Forum 18 yesterday, three organizers of a mass petition calling for liberalization of the country's 2002 Law on Religion have been fined for violating the the 2003 Law on the Realisation of Legislative Initiatives by Citizens. That law requires groups launching a legislative initiative to register with the electoral commission before collecting signatures. The organizers claimed unsuccessfully that since they had not proposed an specific text for revision of the Religion Law, they were not organizing an initiative. Instead they were asking governmental bodies to amend the law. (See prior related posting.)

President Proclaims May As Jewish American Heritage Month

Yesterday President George W. Bush issued a Proclamation (full text) declaring May 2008 as Jewish American Heritage Month. The Proclamation says that the month creates an "opportunity to celebrate the history, culture, and faith of Jewish Americans and their contributions to our Nation."

Recent Scholarly Articles and Movies of Interest

From SSRN:

• David N. Wagner, Religion and State: An Ecclesiological Perspective, (April 26, 2008).


• Patrick McKinley Brennan, "What's the Matter with You Catholics?" Soundings in Catholic Social Thought: "Traditions in Turmoil" by Mary Ann Glendon, (Journal of Law, Philosophy and Culture, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2008).


• Anita L. Allen, Undressing Difference: The Hijab in the West, (U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-18, April 29, 2008).


• David Lawrence Clingingsmith, Asim Ijaz Khwaja, Asim & Michael Kremer, Estimating the Impact of the Hajj: Religion and Tolerance in Islam's Global Gathering, (HKS Working Paper No. RWP08-022, April 2008).


• David A. Simon, Register Trademarks and Keep the Faith: Trademarks, Religion, and Identity, (April 28, 2008).


• Nina J. Crimm, Muslim-Americans' Charitable Giving Dilemma: What About a Centralized Terror-Free Donor Advised Fund?, (Roger Williams Law Review Symposium Issue, Vol. 13 , 2008).

From ACS:

• Edward Correia, A Constitutional Framework for Addressing Religious Viewpoints in Public Classrooms, (April 21, 2008).

From SmartCILP:

• Kenneth A. Klukowski, In Whose Name We Pray: Fixing the Establishment Clause Train Wreck Involving Legislative Prayer, 6 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 219-282 (2008).


• Samuel J. Levine, Taking Ethical Obligations Seriously: A Look At American Codes of Professional Responsibility Through a Perspective of Jewish Law and Ethics, 57 Catholic University Law Review 165-202 (2007).


• Jana R. McCreary, This Is the Trap the Courts Built: Dealing With the Entanglement of Religion and the Origin of Life in American Public Schools, 37 Southwestern University Law Review 1-67 (2008).


• Peter Irons, Darwin, Dogma, and Definitions: A Reply to Professor McCreary, 37 Southwestern University Law Review 69-82 (2008).


• Jana R. McCreary, Focusing Too Much On the Forest Might Hide the Evolving Trees: A Response to Professor Irons, 37 Southwestern University Law Review 83-96 (2008).

New Movies:

• Constantine's Sword (2007), reviewed in New York Times.
• Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (2007), reviewed in New York Times. [Updated]

Obama Denounces His Pastor As Religion Continues Importance In Campaign

Religion has played an unusually important role in the 2008 presidential primaries for many months. In the latest illustration of this, yesterday Barack Obama held a press conference (full transcript) denouncing remarks made at the National Press Club on Monday (transcript) by his long-time pastor Jeremiah Wright. Those remarks followed two other appearances by Wright-- a Friday evening interview on Bill Moyers Journal (transcript) and a speech at an NAACP dinner on Sunday night (transcript). Today's New York Times reports on Obama's public rejection of Wright. Obama said in part: "What became clear to me was that he was presenting a world view that ... contradicts who I am and what I stand for. And what I think particularly angered me was his suggestion somehow that my previous denunciation of his remarks were somehow political posturing."

Recently Available Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Graham v. Mahmood, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33954 (SDNY, April 23, 2008), a New York federal district court dismissed claims under the First and 14th Amendments and RLUIPA brought by an inmate who was a follower of the Nation of Islam. Plaintiff alleged that NOI was disfavored in comparison to Sunni Muslims in access to prison meeting and office space. He also alleged retaliation for pursuing related grievances.

In Shilling v. Crawford, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33567 (D NV, March 12, 2008), a Nevada federal district court held that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity in a suit by an inmate who claimed that his rights under RLUIPA were violated when his request for a kosher diet was accommodated only by offering to transfer him to a higher security facility at which such meals were available.

Rose v. Masiey, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33499 (SDNY, Feb. 19, 2008), is one of over a dozen suits filed by Muslim inmates challenging the handling of food and related items at Rikers Island prison facility, and the failure to identify non-Halal food at the prison commissary. The court denied most of defendants' motions to dismiss, except that claims against certain of the corrections officers named as defendants were dismissed on the ground of qualified immunity.

Malik v. Ozmint, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33904 (D SC, Feb. 13, 2008), involved a RLUIPA challenge to a South Carolina prison policy that prevented plaintiff from wearing his kufi outside of his cell. A federal magistrate judge recommended that the claim be dismissed without prejudice on exhaustion grounds, but that on the merits prison authorities had not justified the restriction. The court rejected plaintiff's claims that his right to fast during Ramadan was infringed by untimely meal deliveries.

Convicted Murderer Waives Appeals Partly for Religious Reasons

In Hill v. State of South Carolina, (SC Sup. Ct., April 28, 2008), the South Carolina Supreme Court upheld the right of convicted murderer David Hill to waive his right to further review and have his death sentence carried out. In explaining his decision to forgo further appeals, Hill discussed his father's health and his own, but also said: "part of my religious beliefs are that if you kill somebody, you shed somebody else’s blood, that your blood has to be shed or you have to die in order to be forgiven for that..." Today's Myrtle Beach Sun News reports on the decision.

British Catholic Adoption Agency Becomes Secular To Avoid Gay Adoption Mandate

In Britain, the Bishop of Nottingham announced yesterday that the Catholic Children's Society adoption agency will become a secular agency by merging with the adoption agency of the Anglican Diocese of Southwell and Nottingham. Total Catholic.com reported that the decision was taken because the agency could not, consistent with Catholic teachings, comply with Britain's Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007 that would have required the Catholic agency to sometimes place children for adoption with same-sex couples. Catholic agencies are required to come into compliance by the end of 2008. (See prior related posting.)

7th Circuit Upholds RLUIPA Claim; Concurrence Criticizes RLUIPA

Last week, the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a former prisoner in a RLUIPA case that is most interesting for the concurring opinion it generated. In Koger v. Bryan, (7th Cir., April 24, 2008), the court held that a former prisoner's claim based on the denial of his request for a vegetarian diet substantially burdened the prisoner's religious exercise. In particular the court found inappropriate the prison's requirement that the religious practice be required by the inmate's religion and that this be verified by a member of the clergy.

Judge Evans concurred, but included in his opinion an interesting attack on RLUIPA:

Clearly, without RLUIPA, this case would have been dead in the water when it was filed because declining Koger’s request for a nonmeat diet would not have violated the United States Constitution....

Because Mr. Koger is out of prison... his request for injunctive relief is moot. And because he was in prison when the case arose, he must proceed under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, which takes compensatory and punitive damages off the table as he suffered no “physical injury” but only, at best, a “mental or emotional injury.” And that limits his recovery to nominal damages.

So when all is said and done, the State of Illinois has spent a lot of money defending this case for six years. Koger may end up with a dollar, and his lawyer, Jeffrey L.Oldham, who by the way has done an outstanding job, will get a limited amount of attorney’s fees. A waste of time? Some may disagree, but I lean towards saying “yes.”

Florida Chambers Pass Competing Bills On Teaching of Evolution

In February, Florida's State Board of Education adopted science teaching standards calling specifically for the teaching of evolution. (See prior posting.) Yesterday's St. Petersburg Times reports that attempts by the state legislature to respond to these standards may fail because the House and Senate have passed competing bills. Yesterday the House voted 71-43 to approve HB 1483 that calls for public schools to add to their curriculum a "scientific critical analysis" of the theory of evolution. However the Senate has already passed SB 2692, the Evolution Academic Freedom Act, providing more extensive protections to teachers who present scientific views critical of evolution in the classroom and to students who hold religious views opposing evolution. (See prior related posting.) Sen. Ronda Storms, sponsor of the Senate bill, says her chamber will not pass the House version.

Malaysia Agency Rejects Prime Minister's Proposal On Conversions

In Malaysia, the government's Islamic Development Department must approve any administrative rule changes relating to Islam. Today's International Herald Tribune reports that the Department has rejected a proposal by the Prime Minister that would have required non-Muslims converting to Islam to notify their families in writing ahead of time. (See prior posting.) The proposed rule was intended to deal with the growing number of disputes over burial rights that have arisen when family members do not know of a supposed conversion. However the Islamic Development Department's director-general, Wan Mohamad Sheikh Abdul Aziz, said it should be "left to the discretion of the person who wishes to embrace Islam to determine how and when it is appropriate to inform family members. ... The existing laws for conversion to Islam and related matters are sufficient." Parliament could still pass the Prime Minister's proposal over the Department's objections.