Religion Clause

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Shoshone Tribe Sues To Stop Development of Nevada Gold Mine

Last Thursday, three Shoshone Indian tribal groups and two environmental organizations filed suit in a Nevada federal district court to stop development of a large open-pit gold mine on Mt. Tenabo. Yesterday's Environment News Service reports that the Bureau of Land Management approved the $500 million Cortez Hills Expansion Project after years of Shoshone opposition. (Full text of BLM environmental impact statement).The lawsuit alleges that the project will destroy land "well-known for its spiritual and cultural importance to the Western Shoshone" and "home to local Shoshone creation stories, spirit life, medicinal, food and ceremonial plants and items." Plaintiffs say the land "continues to be used to this day by Shoshone for spiritual and cultural practices." Some Western Shoshone communities however support the project, having entered a collaborative agreement with mine developers who will set up a Western Shoshone Educational Legacy Fund tied to revenue from the mine.

Two On Obama's Economic Team Have Worked On Religious Liberty Issues

Ahead of his news conference yesterday, President-elect Barack Obama announced his choice for five key economic posts in the federal government. (Wall Street Journal). In a release yesterday, the Orthodox Jewish Union reports that two of these appointees also have made significant contributions in the field of religious liberty. Melody Barnes, picked as director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, served on the staff of Senator Ted Kennedy from 1995-2003. There she worked on important religious freedom initiatives, including the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Heather Higginbottom, chosen as deputy director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, served as Senator John Kerry’s Legislative Director from 1999 to 2007. In that position she sought to obtain support in Congress for the Workplace Religious Freedom Act.

6th Circuit Allows Some Sex-Abuse Claims Against Vatican To Proceed Under FSIA

In O'Bryan v. Holy See, (6th Cir., Nov. 24, 2008), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court decision dismissing certain claims against the Vatican in a clergy sex-abuse case, but permitting other claims to proceed under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). At the heart of the claims against the Vatican were allegations that, through a 1962 directive, it implemented a policy to keep allegations of childhood sexual abuse by priests secret. Finding that the Holy See is a foreign state under FSIA, the court held that plaintiffs had waived any Establishment Clause challenge to applying FSIA to the Vatican. Under FSIA, federal courts have jurisdiction only if one of the statute's exceptions to sovereign immunity apply. The court rejected arguments that the commercial activity exception or the tortious act exception subjected the Holy See to suit in U.S. courts. However the court went on to hold that the tortious act exception did allow claims against the Holy See arising out of conduct of Holy See employees in the United States engaged in the supervision of allegedly abusive priests, including clergy failure to warn parents or report perpetrators. AP reported on the decision yesterday.

UPDATE: Also reporting on the decision, yesterday's Wall Street Journal says that attorneys for the Vatican are not "presently inclined" to seek Supreme Court review. The Wall Street Journal has also posted the full text of the once-confidential 1962 directive on how Diocesan officials should proceed "in cases of solicitation".

Vietnam Ends Attempt To Control Catholics; Recognizes Mennonites

The press this week reported on two significant developments out of Vietnam. According to Asia News , the government's attempt to follow China's lead and create create a Catholic Church controlled by the Communist Party instead of the Pope has failed. Meanwhile Ekklesia reports that the Vietnam National Religious Affairs Committee has given full legal recognition to the Vietnam Mennonite Church which held its first official General Assembly on Nov. 15-17.

Holy Land Foundation Leaders Convicted In Their Retrial

Yesterday, according to the New York Times, federal prosecutors in Dallas, Texas obtained convictions against five leaders of a Muslim charity for funneling donations to the terrorist group Hamas. Last October, a mistrial on most charges occurred in the trial of leaders of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. (See prior posting.) But on this retrial, the jury found the defendants guilty on 108 counts of supporting terrorism, money laundering and tax fraud. Defendants plan an appeal. Before the U.S. closed it down in 2001, the Holy Land Foundation was the largest Islamic charity in the United States.

UPDATE: A Nov. 25 New York Times article reports on the reaction of the American Muslim community to the convictions-- the community is divided over the case.

U.N.'s 3rd Committee Approves Resolution on Combatting Defamation of Religions

Yesterday the United Nations General Assembly's Third Committee (which focuses on social humanitarian and cultural issues) adopted a controversial resolution urging countries to combat the defamation of religion. Canwest News Service reports that the resolution passed 85-50, with 42 abstentions. The 6-page Resolution (full text in Word doc.) includes a call for "all States to provide, within their respective legal and constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions and incitement to religious hatred in general...." Similar resolutions have been put forward in other U.N. venues as part of a campaign by the Organization of the Islamic Conference. (See prior posting.) Canwest says that "While this year's draft is less Islam-centric that resolutions of earlier years, analysts note it is more emphatic in linking religion defamation and incitement to violence."

The American Jewish Committee, in a release yesterday, said that the resolution, sponsored by Belarus, Uganda, and Venezuela, "stifles valid scrutiny of radical Islam and condones intimidation as a response to insensitive speech." Scoop News says that this year's vote in favor of the resolution reflected a decline in support, stemming from efforts by groups such as the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and UN Watch to muster opposition the measure.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Spanish Court Says Schools Must Remove Crucifixes

For the first time, a judge in Spain has ordered a public school to remove crucifixes from the walls of its classrooms and public spaces. Today's Edmonton (Vancouver) Journal reports that the ruling came in the city of Valladolid in a case in which a parent and a secular organization claimed that schools were violating the constitutional guarantee of church-state separation. Art. 16 of Spain's Constitution provides: "No religion shall have a state character. The public powers shall take into account the religious beliefs of Spanish society and maintain the appropriate relations of cooperation, with the Catholic Church and other denominations." The court held that "The presence of these symbols in areas ... where minors are being educated can promote the idea that the state is closer" to Roman Catholicism than other religions.

British Airways Employee Loses Appeal In Religious Jewelry Case

In Eweida v. British Airways PLC [Word doc.], (Empl. App. Trib., Nov. 20, 2008), Britain's Employment Appeal Tribunal held that British Airways had not engaged in "indirect discrimination" in insisting that a cross worn on a necklace by check-in clerk Nadia Eweida be concealed by her uniform. Only the holding below relating to indirect discrimination was appealed. BA's policy, which applied to all jewelry including religious items, had an exception if wearing the item was a "mandatory" scriptural requirement and it could not be concealed under the uniform. Ultimately Eweida returned to work after BA amended its policy.

Wearing the cross was not a tenet of Eweida's Christian faith, but instead was a personal expression of belief. The Tribunal found that there was not evidence that BA's policy had a disparate impact on Christians, or a group of Christians, "because there was no evidence that a sufficient number of persons other than the claimant shared her strong religious view that she should be allowed visibly to wear the cross." Personnel Today reports on the decision. (See prior related posting).

Wisconsin Town Repeals Ordinance Out of Concern For Amish Buggies

Loyal, Wisconsin City Council last week repealed an ordinance that it had passed just a month earlier, out of concern that the law would discourage local Amish residents from visiting the city in their horse-drawn buggies. The ordinance would have required horses within city limits to wear manure-catching devices. According to last Friday's Salt Lake Tribune, Amish were afraid that the required bags would make their hoses skittish. After enacting the repeal by a vote of 7-1, City Council went on by a vote of 5-3 to require that horse-drawn vehicles use only a prescribed route through town.

Muslim Prisoners In British Facility Force Conversion on Fellow Inmates

London's Sunday Express reported yesterday that in Cambridgeshire's top security Whitemoor prison, Muslim inmates have launched a "reign of terror", forcing other prisoners to convert to Islam or face beatings or worse. The Prison Officers' Association has been calling for dispersal of the 100 Muslim prisoners in Whitemoor elsewhere in order to break up the gang violence.

UPDATE: The Nov. 28 Muslim News reports that an inspection of Whitemoor prison last month by the Chief Inspector of Prisons found that "the Prison Service as a whole needs to equip staff better to deal with the growing number of Muslim prisoners." However the report gave high marks to Whitemoor's religious program for its Muslim inmates.

Parents Must Move From Alamo Church Compound To Regain Custody of Girls

As previously reported, in September after federal authorities raided the compound of Tony Alamo Ministries, Arkansas officials took six minor girls into temporary custody. According to yesterday's Arkansas Democrat Gazette, a hearing was held last Friday on the status of two of those girls. Miller County Circuit Judge Jim Hudson, following recommendations of the state Department of Human Services, ruled that the girls can be returned to their parents only if the parents move off property controlled by Tony Alamo Christian Ministries. The family must also establish financial independence from the church. However, the parents can continue to attend church services. On Saturday, the judge said he would be willing to consider other plans proposed by the parents to protect the girls without moving. State authorities objected to the girls living in the same house with Alamo and several of his wives. Also the girls had not received childhood vaccinations, and were not being educated by state-certified teachers or in a registered home-school program.

Meanwhile, hearings are scheduled today in Miller County, Arkansas Circuit Court for 20 additional children who were removed last week from parents who attend the Tony Alamo Christian Ministries. (Arkansas Online.)

Sunday, November 23, 2008

African-American Muslims In U.S. Reject al Qaeda Statement

On Friday, according to CNN, leaders of New York's African-American Muslim community issued a statement denouncing recorded comments from al Qaeda's second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahiri. The Zawahiri video tape, released on the Internet last Wednesday (Washington Post), denounced President-elect Barack Obama. It said that Obama represents the "direct opposite of honorable black Americans" like Malcolm X. In a statement read during a news conference at the Malcolm X and Dr. Betty Shabazz Memorial, Educational and Cultural Center, the African-American Muslim leaders said: "We find it insulting when anyone speaks for our community instead of giving us the dignity and the honor of speaking for ourselves." The Council on American-Islamic Relations also condemned Zawahiri's statements.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Tapp v. Stanley, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93122 (WD NY, Nov. 17, 2008), a New York federal district court rejected an inmate's free exercise and RLUIPA claims arising out of a nearly 4-month delay in furnishing him kosher food while his request for it, and his religious designation form, were being processed. A separate claim regarding inability of non-Christians to participate in the Angel Tree program was dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

In Foster v. Ouachita Correctional Center, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92914 (WD LA, Nov. 14, 2008), a Louisiana federal district court allowed an inmate to proceed with his claim that authorities violated his rights under the 1st Amendment and RLUIPA by not allowing him to participate in weekly worship services, not permitting him to fast during Ramadan, and not furnishing him a pork-free diet. Two other claims were dismissed as frivolous.

In Furnace v. Sullivan, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93464 (ND CA, Nov. 10, 2008), a California federal district court rejected a claim by an inmate (a practitioner of the African religion of "Shetaut Neter") that his rights under the 1st Amendment and RLUIPA were violated when on one morning he was refused his vegetarian food tray in an incident that led to his being assaulted with pepper spray. However plaintiff was permitted to proceed with claims alleging excessive force and equal protection violations, and allowed him to amend his complaint to allege that he has exhausted administrative remedies as to his state law claims involving free exercise and equal protection violations.

In Richard v. Border, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93519 (D OR, Nov. 17, 2008), an Oregon federal district court rejected plaintiff's claim that his 1st Amendment rights were violated by requiring him to live at the Eugene Mission, which requires attendance at a church service, as a condition of his post-prison supervision. The court found that plaintiff had requested to live at Eugene Mission and never proposed an alternative living arrangement after his objections arose.

In Boretsky v. Corzine, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94583 (D NJ, Nov. 20, 2008), a New Jersey federal district court permitted an inmate to move ahead with his claims that his free exercise and due process rights, and his rights under RLUIPA, were violated when his placement in isolation deprived him of his ability to participate in religious activities.

City Asks For Removal of Billboard With Anti-Religion Message

The San Francisco Chronicle reported Friday that the city of Rancho Cucamonga, CA, after receiving numerous complaints, asked the General Outdoor advertising company to take down a billboard carrying a message from the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The sign company complied, removing the "Imagine No Religion" billboard. FFRF says the city should not be censoring speech. This is not the first time the city has requested removal of a billboard seen as offensive to some. In September, it asked another company to take down a billboard advertising vagina rejuvenation. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

ADL Covers A Range of Issues at Meeting Marking 95th Year

In a release issued Friday, the Anti-Defamation League summarized the proceedings of its annual meeting held earlier this month in Los Angeles. The ADL marks its 95th birthday this year. In the keynote address, ADL director Abraham Foxman reported that in the wake of the country's financial crisis, anti-Semitic conspiracy theories are spreading on the Internet. Separately, the ADL released a new poll showing that a majority of Americans believe that religious values are under attack in the U.S., but there has been a decline in concern about racial tensions. Finally the ADL adopted a resolution on religious accommodation in the workplace, favoring it if it does not infringe others' rights or create undue employer burdens. The resolution opposed "policies or laws that permit a pharmacist to interfere with the physician-patient relationship by refusing to fill prescriptions without simultaneously offering a referral source to the patient so that his or her medication can be promptly and timely obtained..." Also it opposed excusing government officials, in states where same-sex marriage is legal, from issuing licenses or performing civil ceremonies unless there is immediate access to another employee who will do so.

Conviction For Interfering With Business Does Not Violate Free Exercise Rights

In Sherman v. Yolo County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92800 (ED CA, Nov. 6, 2008), a California federal district court rejected a habeas challenge by a defendant, now in prison, who was convicted of intentionally interfering with a lawful business by obstructing customers (CA Penal Code 602.1). Joseph Sherman was aggressively preaching and handing out Bible materials to people entering and leaving Longs Drugs in Davis (CA). He became hostile when asked to leave. The court rejected Sherman's claim that his 1st Amendment speech and free exercise rights were violated. It found that the state statute under which Sherman was convicted is a rationally-based neutral law of general applicability.

In Malaysia, Parties Seeking Federal Court Ruling In Catholic Paper Case

As previously reported, in Malaysia the Catholic newspaper The Herald has filed suit in the High Court in Kuala Lumpur to challenge the Home Ministry's decision banning the paper from using the term "Allah" as a synonym for God in its Malay-language reporting. Now, according to yesterday's New Straits Times, several state religious councils have obtained a stay a stay of proceedings until Feb. 27 from the court so the parties can ask the Federal Court for a ruling on the constitutionality of various laws involved in the case. Meanwhile, the Malaysian Gurdwaras Council will ask the Attorney-General to avoid a confrontation in the case.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

In Nigeria, Children Accused by Churches of Being Witches Are Tortured By Their Families

Saturday's Lagos Guardian reports that in parts of the Nigerian states of Akwa Ibom and Cross River, there has been an alarming increase in the number of children who are suspected by their parents of being "witches" or "wizards." Many of them are abandoned, tortured or killed by their families after prophets from Pentecostal sects declare the children to possess strange powers. The craze seems to have been started in the late 1990's by Prophetess Helen Ukpabio, founder of the Liberty Gospel Church. Her home movies portrayed some children as possessing supernatural powers that they can use to bring misfortune to their families. The Child's Right Rehabilitation Network (CRARN) is providing shelter for over 150 of these abused children at its Children's Centre, and is working to get the parents who tortured or murdered children prosecuted.

A Review of Same-Sex Marriage Developments In Connecticut

In the widespread coverage of the battle over gay marriage in California, less attention has been given to a decision by the Connecticut Supreme Court last month holding that limiting same-sex couples to civil unions, instead of marriage, violates the equal protection guarantees of the Connecticut state Constitution. An article in this week’s Yale Herald titled Gay Couples Marry as Campus Christians Sit Silent is occasion to look more closely at developments in Connecticut.

In Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, (CT Sup Ct, Oct. 10, 2008) (majority, dissents 1, 2, 3), the court, in a 4-3 decision, applied intermediate scrutiny to strike down Connecticut's statutory scheme barring same-sex marriage. Opponents then supported a proposal that is automatically on the November ballot every 20 years to call a state constitutional convention. [corrected]. The convention could have potentially proposed a constitutional amendment to overturn the court's decision. However, that proposal was overwhelmingly defeated at the polls earlier this month.

Of particular interest is the analysis by the majority in the Kerrigan case concluding that sexual orientation is a quasi-suspect classification that triggers heightened scrutiny. One part of the test for a quasi-suspect class is its "political powerlessness." As the court explained:

a group satisfies the political powerlessness factor if it demonstrates that, because of the pervasive and sustained nature of the discrimination that its members have suffered, there is a risk that that discrimination will not be rectified, sooner rather than later, merely by resort to the democratic process.

Interestingly, the court then went on to, in part, rely on the strong religious opposition to homosexual activity as evidence of the political powerlessness of gays and lesbians. The court said:

Feelings and beliefs predicated on such profound religious and moral principles are likely to be enduring, and persons and groups adhering to those views undoubtedly will continue to exert influence over public policy makers.

The court then added in a footnote (fn. 37):

Of course we do not suggest that there is anything untoward or improper about such efforts to mold public policy or opinion, for such activity lies at the core of our democratic system. Nor do we equate religious beliefs with prejudice. Our point is simply that gay persons face steep, if not insurmountable, hurdles in changing or even modifying deeply held beliefs that their manner of sexual intimacy is morally unacceptable.

Britain's New Pension Authority Will Offer Sharia-Compliant Option

In 2006, Britain enacted legislation to reform its pension system. Among other things, the Pensions Act 2007 created the Personal Accounts Delivery Authority which will create new low cost pension savings vehicles for individuals. (Background.) The London Telegraph reported yesterday that the Authority will offer a Sharia-compliant pension fund as one of the options in order to encourage Muslim participation. Many Muslims who have low-paying jobs or who have recently moved to Britain are thought to have little saved for retirement so far. The Sharia-compliant fund would not invest in financial service firms, or in companies involved in gambling, liquor or pornography industries. Britain's Child Trust Fund already offers Sharia-compliant baby bonds.

Germany Will Not Attempt To Ban Scientology Now

The AP reports that Germany’s Interior Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble, as well as domestic intelligence authorities from Germany's 16 states, agreed Friday that they had insufficient evidence to open formal proceedings to ban the Church of Scientology. To open proceedings, authorities need evidence of unconstitutional activities. They had been monitoring Scientology-- which they consider a business that takes advantage of vulnerable individuals.-- to determine if it seeks to limit basic human rights such as equality and the right to develop one’s personality. Even though they are not proceeding with charges now, authorities will continue to monitor Scientology’s activities in Germany. (See prior related posting.)

Muslim Group Urges NYPD To Revise Its Assessment of Domestic Terror Threat

At a press conference held on Thursday, the New York Muslim American Civil Liberties Coalition released a report titled: Counterterrorism Policy: MACLC's Critique of the NYPD’s Report on Homegrown Radicalism. As reported by The American Muslim, the report calls on the New York Police Department to update its 2007 study, Radicalization in the West: Homegrown Radicalism. The MALC report's Preface summarizes the objections to the NYPD study:

The NYPD Report calls into question the loyalties and motivations of law-abiding and mainstream Muslims in a deeply offensive way and paints them as potential threats to national security without substantiated evidence. Furthermore, it erroneously associates religious precepts with violence and terror, irrespective of First Amendment and Equal Protection rights. As such, MACLC has found that the NYPD Report neither protects American Muslims from undeserved scrutiny and profiling nor strengthens domestic security discourse.

Friday, November 21, 2008

Hezbollah In Lebanon Harnessing Religion of Youth For Its Political Agenda

Today's New York Times carries a long investigative article starting on its front page titled Hezbollah Seeks to Marshal the Piety of the Young. It says in part:

At a time of religious revival across the Islamic world, intense piety among the young is nothing unusual. But in Lebanon, Hezbollah — the name means the party of God — has marshaled these ambient energies for a highly political project: educating a younger generation to continue its military struggle against Israel. Hezbollah’s battlefield resilience has made it a model for other militant groups across the Middle East, including Hamas. And that success is due, in no small measure, to the party’s extraordinarily comprehensive array of religion-themed youth and recruitment programs.

County Council Member Objects To Rezoning Because of Opposition To Church Policy

Catholic News Agency reports today that Beaufort County, South Carolina Councilwoman Laura Von Harten has apologized for controversial remarks she made at a Council committee meeting last Monday. The Beaufort (SC) Gazette reported on Tuesday that the county's Land Management Committee, on which Von Harten does not sit, approved rezoning for expansion of St. Gregory the Great Catholic Church by a vote of 5-2. During discussion at the Committee meeting, however, Van Harten spoke to say she would not support the rezoning when it comes up for a full Council vote because of "human rights issues." She said that Catholic Church policies are an "affront to my dignity and all of womankind." She especially objected to the Church's ban on female clergy and her dislike of the way the Church wishes to "control women's uteruses." She said: "I don't want to support anything that will perpetuate that kind of ideology."

Apologizing on Tuesday, Von Harten said that her human rights concerns relate to "the Catholic Church as a political entity, with a seat at the United Nations, but I acknowledge that I offended individuals in my own community." She added: "Please be assured that I have been reminded of the importance of separation of church and state in matters of land use, and have learned a great deal from this incident." She now says she will abstain from voting on the St. Gregory zoning issue when it reaches Council.

PA School Board Says Teachers Can Be At "Pole" Event With A Disclaimer

Pennsylvania's Carlisle Area School Board, responding to the threat of a lawsuit, voted 8-1 yesterday to allow teachers to attend this year's student-led "See You At the Pole" event. At the annual event, held around the nation, students gather before school at the flag pole to pray for their school, fellow-students, teachers and nation. According to today's Harrisburg (PA) Patriot-News, teachers attending will be required to make clear that they are there in their individual capacities and not as school employees. One of 49 parents who signed a letter opposing teacher attendance testified at the board meeting: "It defies logic that students should believe that a teacher should issue a disclaimer, that for a few moments they are peers under a flag pole, 40 yards from the school." (See prior related posting.)

Bangladesh Elections Threaten To Disenfranchise Muslims On Hajj

Wednesday's Daily Star reports on an election controversy in Bangladesh. Parliamentary elections are scheduled for December 18. This however is during the Hajj, and over 48,000 Bangladeshis who will be in Saudi Arabia for the religious pilgrimage will be disenfranchised. The BNP-four party alliance has demanded that election be rescheduled. However some legal experts argue that rescheduling would violate the election code that prohibits using religion for political or electoral purposes.

Proponents Announce New Strategy On Display of Nativity Scenes

CBN News yesterday reported that two Christian groups have come up with a new holiday display strategy. The National Clergy Council and the Christian Defense Coalition have begun "The Nativity Project." It encourages individuals to display nativity scenes in public places such as city halls, state capitol buildings and other public buildings. Project promoters say that "as individual citizens" these displays can be put up-- sometimes with, and sometimes without a permit. While not explicit on the matter, apparently the idea is for individuals to temporarily display the nativity scenes and stay with them in areas open for advocacy activities. The story touts the placing of a nativity scene in front of the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday-- apparently there temporarily while proponents were with it. Proponents also announced that for the first time ever, the groups have permission to stage a live nativity scene in Times Square on December 6th. The project is also encouraging the display of nativity scenes outside of private homes-- an activity that poses no legal problems.

Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Allowing Evangelist To Preach On Public Plaza

In Borden v. City of Modesto, (ED CA, Nov. 19, 2008), a California federal district court issued a preliminary injunction requiring the city of Modesto to give evangelist Kevin Borden equal access to the city's pedestrian Tenth Street Plaza to preach and proselytize. In its 22-page opinion, the court held that the entire Plaza is a public forum. Brenden Theaters, located adjacent to the Plaza, on various week end nights rented out part of the Plaza for parties. At those times it excluded Borden from the rented barricaded area, even though the rented area was essentially open to anyone else. The court held that the city may not delegate to those who rent out space unfettered discretion to exclude entry. The preliminary injunction-- which will remain in effect while the action is pending-- however allows exclusion of Borden when space is rented out for truly private events or for expression of a particular message. Alliance Defense Fund issued a release discussing the decision.

Indonesian Police Look To Prosecute Blogger Who Posted Muhammad Cartoons

In Jakarta, Indonesia, a government spokesman says that the Indonesian National Police cybercrime unit is attempting to trace the identity of a blogger whose blog contains cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad. Jakarta Metro Police Special Crime Investigation Commissioner Raja Erizman says that the server and the blogger are outside of Indonesia, and that the blogger's motive is to upset Indonesia's Muslim community. According to Tempo Interactive yesterday, officials say the blogger, if identified, will be charged criminally with defaming religion and with violating the Information and Electronic Transaction Law.

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Texas Board of Education Hears Testimony On Proposed Science Standards

Yesterday, the Texas State Board of Education heard testimony on its proposed standards for teaching science. Links to the full text of the standards and panel reports on them are available from the Texas Education Agency's website. Today's Dallas Morning News reports on testimony of some of the nearly 90 people who had registered to speak at the hearings. The focus was primarily on how evolution should be taught. As summarized by the paper:

College professors, science teachers and pro-evolution groups urged the board to drop a rule that requires the strengths and weaknesses of Darwin's theory to be taught in science courses, while conservative groups aligned with a sizable bloc of board members said the rule has worked well and hasn't forced religion into those classes as critics charge....
Revisions recommended by a panel of experts this week call for changing the "strengths-and-weaknesses" standard to "strengths and limitations." Another recommendation calls for middle school students to "discuss possible alternative explanations" for scientific concepts.

White House Won't Comment On Summum Case

The major church-state case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court this term is Pleasant Grove City, UT v. Summum. It was argued last week. (See prior posting.) Apparently the White House wants to steer clear of the controversy. Here is an exchange from yesterday's White House press briefing (full text) by Press Secretary Dana Perino. The reporter asking the question was WorldNet Daily correspondent, Les Kinsolving:

Q: Does the President believe or reject the contention that the First Amendment grants the 33-year-old Summum organization a right to erect a monument to its Seven Aphorisms in the city of Pleasant Grove, Utah, because there's a Ten Commandments monument?

MS. PERINO: Les, I really don't understand why you ask me these questions at the briefing. It's kind of a waste of your time, and it's a waste of everybody else's time. And it's really a waste of my time.

Q: No. This was page one.

MS. PERINO: I missed it.

Q: It was page one.

WorldNet Daily reported today on the exchange.

Court Says Church Can Continue Use of Building, But Must Comply With Code

In Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San Diego, (SD CA, Nov. 18, 2008), a California federal district court, citing "the overwhelming public interest ... in religious freedoms and activities", issued a preliminary injunction allowing a church to continue to meet in a trailer park recreation center that it rented. The building is currently zoned for serving alcoholic beverages and live entertainment, but not for religious use, and the county had issued a cease and desist order against the church. While enjoining enforcement of that order, the court required the church to first remedy the eight most serious code violations identified by county zoning authorities and to apply for a master use permit within 30 days of remedying the violations. Other code violations must be remedied within 90 days. The court said that the church's RLUIPA claim was not ripe because the church had not applied for a use permit or a zoning change. Today's San Diego Union-Tribune reports on the decision.

California Supreme Court Will Hear Challenges To Proposition 8

The California Supreme Court yesterday agreed to accept original jurisdiction over challenges to voter approval of Proposition 8, the ballot measure that bans same-sex marriage. (Judicial Council press release.) Yesterday's Los Angeles Times reports on the court's action. The cryptic two-page order issued by the Supreme Court (full text) actually covers a good deal of ground. It agrees to hear three of the six cases filed challenging the validity of Proposition 8. It permits the official proponents of the ballot issue to intervene as a party. In the order, the Court agreed (over one dissent) to decide whether Proposition 8 is a "revision" rather than an "amendment" to California's Constitution. The Proposition was passed under procedures for amendments. The Court will also decide whether Proposition 8 violates the separation of powers doctrine under California's constitution. In addition, if the court decides that Proposition 8 is valid, it will determine its effect on pre-existing gay marriages performed in California.

Finally, the court (over one dissent) refused to stay the operation of Proposition 8 pending the court's decision in the matter. A release by ProtectMarriage.com called denial of the requested stay the most significant part of the order. It is unclear what the court will do as to three other challenges that have been filed, including one by a number of religious groups. (See prior posting.)

Meanwhile, other countries are facing legal issues involving gay marriage. Jurist reported yesterday that the Supreme Court of Nepal has ordered an end to government discrimination based on sexual orientation. It has told the government to draft legislation permitting same-sex partnership and marriage. This follows a decision last year by the Court holding that sexual minorities should be granted equal rights.

UPDATE: The Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday that Proposition 8 supporters are considering the possiblility of a recall campaign aimed at California Supreme Court justices who vote to invalidate the approval of Proposition 8.

UPDATE: All orders, pleadings and briefs in the Proposition 8 challenges are posted on a special page on the Supreme Court's website.

Chabad Messianists Again Lose Court Battle Over Crown Heights Building

Earlier this month, a Brooklyn, New York trial court issued another decision in the long-running battle between two factions of the Chabad Lubavitch movement-- those who believe that the late grand Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who died in 1994, may be referred to publicly as the Messiah, and those who reject the messianist faction. A December 2007 trial court decision gave control of the movement's Crown Heights headquarters to the anti-messianist faction (Agudas Chasedei Chabad and Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch), allowing them to eject the other faction which maintained a congregation (known as Congregation Lubavitch, Inc.) in the building's basement. (See prior posting.) Apparently this decision has been appealed.

As part of the long running case, in 2006 the court issued an order (full text) barring various individuals in the messianist faction from defacing, removing or interfering with a plaque commemorating the Rebbe's death that had been placed on the outer wall of Chabad's headquarters building. The messianists objected to the plaque because it referred to the Rebbe using a Hebrew acronym for "of blessed memory," thus suggesting that he was dead. (See prior posting and this background.)

Now in Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch, Inc. v. Sharf, (NY Kings Co. Sup. Ct., Nov. 3, 2008), a New York trial court rejected an attempt by one of the parties to challenge the 2006 decision. In addition the court rejected an attempt by the messianists--Congregation Lubavitch, Inc. (CLI)-- to obtain access to a security plan that Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch (MLC) agreed to in accepting New York state homeland security funds. CLI also wanted the court to order the concealment of any security cameras and to ban recording of prayer services on the sabbath and holidays except for law enforcement purposes. Also, apparently still asserting their control of the basement synagogue, CLI wanted to ban MLC from access to interior video recordings and wanted other restrictions on access to recordings. The court, relying on the 2007 decision that MLC was the legitimate owner of the property, held that CLI had no basis to obtain these limitations. [Thanks to J.J. Landa for the lead.]

Clergy Led Prayer Is Back In Indiana House

The Indy Star reports that this week, for the first time since January 2006, the Indiana state House of Representatives opened its session with a prayer led by a clergyman. In late 2005, a federal district court enjoined sectarian prayer in the House, but in late 2007 that decision was reversed by the 7th Circuit that held plaintiff lacked standing. (See prior postings, 1, 2.) In 2006, House members had gathered at the back of the Chamber to pray. In 2007 and 2008, the House Speaker read a nonsectarian prayer from the podium. But now clergy-led prayer has returned. Rev. Matthew Barnes opened Tuesday's session with a non-sectarian invocation that asked for God's guidance and blessings, but did not mention Jesus.

UPDATE: Thursday's Fort Wayne Journal Gazette says that the Indiana Senate will open its 2009 sessions with prayers offered by Senate members and by visiting clergy.

Jury Finds For Boulder Colorado Church In RLUIPA Case

The Longmont (CO) Times Call reported yesterday that a federal court jury has rendered its decision in Rocky Mountain Christian Church v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, Colorado. (See prior posting.) The case involves a challenge to the denial of a church's application for a special use permit so it can expand its facilities. The jury rejected the church's equal protection claims, but found that the Boulder County Commissioners violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by not treating the church equally with non-religious institutions and by placing a substantial burden on its exercise of religion. The jury did not award damages that the church sought to cover construction cost increases.

Israeli Officials Express Frustration Over Strict Conversion Rules

In Israel, the strict rules for conversion to Judaism imposed by the Chief Rabbinate continue to rankle government officials who want to find a way to help some 300,000 Russian immigrants who are not technically Jewish under religious law. Many of them wish to convert, but do not want to commit to a strict Orthodox Jewish religious lifestyle which is imposed as a condition of conversion by rabbis who control the government's conversion courts. Yesterday's Jerusalem Post reports that in a speech to the Board of Governors of the Jewish Agency for Israel, outgoing Cabinet Secretary Oved Yehezkel warned of the political problem posed by the situation. He said: "If the haredim [ultra-orthodox] don't begin to show flexibility, the moderate Orthodox establishment in Israel will begin to independently convert many thousands of Jews. In the end, the State of Israel will be forced to recognize these conversions regardless of the desires of the Chief Rabbinate or the official Conversion Authority."

Earlier this week, according to JTA, the Jewish Agency Assembly adopted resolutions calling for Israel to create an independent authority on Jewish conversions and special courts of Jewish law that would apply more "moderate and tolerant" halachic legal standards to facilitate conversions. (Full text of Jewish Agency resolutions.)

Tzipi Livni, the Kadima party candidate for prime minister in the upcoming Israeli elections, took an even more iconoclastic view in a speech to Americans and Canadians in Jerusalem attending the General Assembly of the United Jewish Communities. The Jerusalem Post quotes her remarks: "A Jewish state is not a monopoly of rabbis. It's what each and everyone feels inside. It's not about learning Hebrew or about joining the army, it's about Jewish tradition, Jewish history."

UPDATE: Here is the full text of Foreign Minister Livni's speech from the Ministry of Foreign Affair's website. The relevant quote is slightly different in this version.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Magistrate Says Subpoena for Megachurch Records Was Improperly Issued

Today's Minneapolis Star Tribune reports that a federal magistrate judge in Minneapolis has recommended that the court refuse to enforce an IRS subpoena for financial documents issued to Living Word Christian Center. The church argued that the subpoena for financial records was not approved by "an appropriate high-level Treasury official" as required by Internal Revenue Code Section 7611. IRS sought information about loans, lease of an aircraft and compensation paid by the Brooklyn Park (MN) megachurch to its pastor, Mac Hammond. (See prior posting.) The magistrate judge agreed with the church that authorization by the Director of Exempt Organization Examinations did not meet the Internal Revenue Code's standard. In United States v. Living Word Christian Center, (D MN, Nov. 18, 2008), the magistrate judge suggested that after a 1998 IRS reorganization, the authority to "halt over-zealous examination of churches" should have been given to the Commissioner of Tax Exempt and Government Entities.

AG Choice Eric Holder Has Little Record On Church-State or Religious Freedom Issues

Barack Obama's reported choice for Attorney General, Eric Holder, appears to have little record on church-state or religious freedom issues. The one aspect of his past record that arguably relates to these issues is his support for strong hate crimes enforcement and legislation. His biography on the Lawyers for One America website says that as United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, he "supported a renewed enforcement emphasis on hate crimes so that criminal acts of intolerance would be severely punished." As Deputy Attorney General in the Justice Department in 1999 he presented testimony (full text) strongly supporting the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 1999. The Act however did not pass Congress. Holder's record gives little hint of whether or not he would continue the Justice Department's "First Freedom Project" launched in 2007 by then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. The project, operated in the Civil Rights Division, emphasizes enforcement in religious discrimination and religious liberty cases.

Objector Arrested For Disrupting Council's Moment of Silence With Loud Prayer

In Southport, Indiana, 70-year old Charles Lynch objects to Mayor Rob Thoman's practice of beginning City Council meetings with a moment of silence instead of a prayer as was the practice before Thoman's election. At Monday night Council's meeting, Lynch began reading a prayer out loud during the moment of silence. When he was asked to stop, he began to pray louder. He also refused to leave the meeting and resisted police trying to take him out, despite the mayor's warning at the beginning of the meeting against such conduct. Lynch was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct. Yesterday's Indy Star reports that Lynch is now threatening to sue for false arrest. He said: "I'm not promoting any church or any religion. All I want is the way it was. Why take away our rights as citizens to have a word of prayer, because we've always had it."

Suit Challenges Refusal To Issue Vanity Plates Refering To God

In Indiana, for an added fee the Bureau of Motor Vehicles issues personalized license plates bearing the driver's selected combination of letters and numbers. Indiana Code Ann. 9-18-15-4 permits the BMV to refuse an application of the requested lettering would be "offensive to good taste and decency." A state regulation interpreting this statute (140 Ind. Adm. Code 2-5-2) prohibits vanity plates that refer to race, religion, deity, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or political party or affiliation" except for generally accepted references to race or ethnic heritage. Elizabeth Ferris applied for plates reading "BE GODS"-- which she explained was inspired by a Christian musician and meant "belonging to God." On Monday, Ferris filed suit in federal district court (full text of complaint) alleging that the refusal to issue her the requested plates violated the free speech, free exercise, equal protection and due process clauses of the U.S. Constitution. Alliance Defense fund issued a release announcing filing of the lawsuit. It pointed out that Ferris had been issued the plates for 9 years previously before this refusal, and that the state issues its own "In God We Trust" specialty plates. (See prior related posting.) Yesterday's Indy Star also reported on Ferris' lawsuit.

UPDATE: Wednesday's Indy Star reports that the Indiana BMV now says that it will allow Elizabeth Ferris to obtain her "BE GODS" license plate because she attempted to reserve the plates before the Nov. 6 effective date of new regulations that prohibit plates that refer to the deity. However BMV Commissioner Ron Stiver defended the new policy, saying that once it allows mention of God on plates, it will also be forced by prohibitions on viewpoint discrimination to issue offensive plates such as "GODLESS".

Algerian Appeals Court Upholds Conviction For Smoking During Ramadan

In Algeria, an appeals court yesterday upheld the convictions of three men for smoking cigarettes on the street during the Ramadan daylight fasting period this past September. However their sentences for offending religion were reduced from 3 month to 2 months in jail, and they are likely to be released this week. The court reversed the conviction of a fourth defendant who was smoking in private. AP reports that the men-- all of whom were construction workers-- were caught in an upscale Algiers neighborhood. Apparently they were charged under a 2001 law that punishes "denigrating the dogmas or precepts if Islam." Algerian secularists are concerned about growing government enforcement of religious rules.

Maryland County Residents Urge Council To Reject RLUIPA Settlement

In Bristol, Maryland, zoning officials denied Riverdale Baptist Church a permit to construct an expanded campus for its Arundel Bay Christian Academy. The Church in turn filed a RLULIPA lawsuit in federal district court charging discrimination. County attorneys negotiated a settlement under which the county would adopt legislation essentially permitting the project to proceed. Yesterday's Annapolis Capital reported that at Monday's South County Council meeting, some 50 residents urged Council to reject the proposed settlement and fight the lawsuit in court. They point to traffic, water runoff and urbanization concerns.

Newsweek Criticized For Article On Obama As the Antichrist

This week's issue of Newsweek carries an article titled Is Obama the Antichrist? The article reports on various signs pointed to by Christian millennialists leading them to the conclusion that the president-elect is the world leader who will usher in the great battle, the Rapture and the Second Coming. Among the portents is the fact that recently one of the winning lottery numbers in Illinois, Obama's home state, was 666 (the sign of the beast). The article reports that Liberty University's law school dean Mat Staver says he does not believe Obama is the Antichrist, but can see how others might believe it. A posting yesterday on Media Matters takes Newsweek to task for giving credibility in its article to the views of RaptureReady.com editor Todd Strandberg

Holder of Sharia Law Degree Becomes Egypt's First Woman Marriage Registrar

Al Jazeera yesterday published an interview with Amal Soliman, the first woman in Egypt to be appointed as a Mazouna, or female marriage registrar. Registrars conduct wedding ceremonies, recite verses from the Quran at the ceremony and sign the official certificates making the marriage legally binding. They also officiate at divorces. The the Committee of Egyptian Mazouns had challenged Soliman's application, saying that it is inappropriate for a woman to hold the position. However Soliman, who holds a post-graduate degree in Sharia law, eventually won out over ten male applicants for the position. Local family court judge Khaled el-Shalkamy accepted Soliman's application last February, but it took until late September for the Egyptian Minister of Justice to formally sign off on the appointment. Soliman conducted her first wedding ceremony on Oct. 25. On Nov. 14, United Arab Emirates followed suit by appointing its first woman as a Mazouna.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

HHS Proposal on Religious Objectors Opposed by Some EEOC Members

Today's New York Times reports on the many comment letters that the Department of Health and Human Services has received on its proposed regulations designed to protect conscience rights of doctors and other health care providers participating in programs receiving HHS funding. The regulations apply to those who have moral or religious objections to providing certain medical procedures, including sterilization and abortion. (See prior posting.) Among the many individuals opposing the rule were three officials of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: its Republican legal counsel, Reed L. Russell, and two Democratic EEOC members, Stuart J. Ishimaru and Christine M. Griffin. They contend that the new rules are unnecessary in light of existing legal precedent. The Times quotes from the letter submitted by Ishimaru and Griffin which argues that the proposed rules would throw into question from 40 years of court decisions had carefully balanced "employees' rights to religious freedom and employers’ business needs." Here is a link to the public submissions on the rule that have been received by HHS.

Indiana's Sale of "In God We Trust" Plates Without Added Fee Is Upheld

In Studler v. Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles, (IN Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2008), an Indiana state appellate court rejected a challenge to Indiana's sale of "In God We Trust" license plates to motorists without charging the $15 administrative fee that is added to the cost of most other special plates. An Indiana driver who was assessed added fees for the state's "Environment" license plate argued that the differential treatment violated Art. I, Sec. 23 of the state's Constitution. That section provides: "The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens." The court rejected plaintiff's argument, holding that "the classification is reasonably related to the inherent characteristics of the license plates," and "the unequal burden is uniformly applicable to all similarly situated class members." Yesterday's Munster (IN) Times reports on the decision.

Religious Groups Ask California Supreme Court To Void Proposition 8

Yesterday the California Council of Churches along with a number of liberal Protestant and Jewish groups filed a "Petition for Writ of Mandate or Prohibition" (full text) with the California Supreme Court seeking to prevent enforcement of Proposition 8 that was approved by voters earlier this month. (Press release). The petition alleges that the state constitutional amendment barring same-sex marriage was adopted using improper procedures. California's constitution (Art. XVIII) has stricter requirements for constitutional "revisions" than it does for "amendments." Only amendments can be adopted through the initiative process-- the route used for Proposition 8. Revisions require a two-thirds vote of the legislature before being submitted to voters. The Petition filed with the Supreme Court reads in part:

The religious institutions that file this petition ... count on article XVIII to ensure that the California Constitution's guarantee of equal protection for religious minorities cannot be taken away without a deliberative process of the utmost care possible in a representative democracy. If Proposition 8 is upheld, however, the assurance will disappear-- for, just as surely as gay men and lesbians could be deprived of equal protection by a simple majority vote, so too could religious minorities be deprived of equal protection-- a terrible irony in a nation founded by people who emigrated to escape religious persecution.

Six separate legal challenges to Proposition 8 have been filed with the California Supreme Court. (San Jose Mercury News, Nov. 17). [Thanks to Don Clark for the lead.]

German Homeschoolers Seek Political Asylum In U.S.

In Germany, children are required to attend public school and home schooling is banned. Uwe and Hannelore Romeike who homeschool their children recently left Germany for the United States in order to avoid fines, jail and possible loss of custody of their children. HSLDA reported yesterday that a petition for political asylum has been filed by the Romeikes who refuse for religious reasons to send their children to Germany's secular public schools. The Romeike family currently lives in Tennessee where they are free to homeschool. Asylum is available where individuals in the U.S. have a well-founded fear of actual persecution because of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion if they return to their home country. Homeschool Legal Defense Association is supporting the unusual asylum application.

Town Sued Over Zoning Ban Preventing Church From Sheltering Homeless

According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Pennsylvania ACLU filed a lawsuit in federal court yesterday on behalf of First Apostles Doctrine Church of Brookville, Pennsylvania. The church and its pastor, Rev. Jack L. Wisor, want to use the church as a homeless shelter, saying providing shelter to "guests" is part of its ministry. In August, Wisor was fined $500 for zoning violations stemming from his allowing three homeless men to live in the church's parsonage. (See prior posting.) The lawsuit alleges that the zoning enforcement violates the 1st Amendment's free exercise clause, the 4th Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure, RLUIPA and Pennsylvania's Religious Freedom Protection Act.

UPDATE: The day after the lawsuit was filed, the parties reached a settlement agreement and on Wednesday the court issued an order that permits the church to resume housing up to eight homeless people and two staff members. (York (PA) Daily Record).

French Appellate Court Reverses Controversial Annulment

An appellate court in Douai in northern France yesterday reversed a decision by a lower court that had granted a Muslim husband an annulment when he discovered that his wife was not the virgin she had claimed to be. The lower court had held that the husband was misled "concerning essential qualities" of his wife. (See prior posting.) Agence France Press reports that now the wife supports the annulment. Many European parliament members complained however that the lower court decision amounted to unacceptable infringement of religion into the public sphere. French Justice Minister Rachida Dati says that, despite the government appeal of the case, the annulment would be acceptable on other non-religious grounds such as breach of trust between husband and wife.

British Employment Appeal Tribunal Broadly Protects Against Religious Bias

In Saini v. All Saints Haque Centre, (UK Empl. App. Trib., Oct. 24, 2008), a British Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 were violated when Employee A is mistreated for the purpose of seeking to get rid of Employee B on the grounds of Employee B's religion. The claimant asserted that an immigration advice center was controlled by adherents to the Ravidass faith who were determined to bring pressure against Hindus employed at the center. Personnel Today reported on the case in yesterday's edition.

Monday, November 17, 2008

Nigerian Court Orders Release of Man Arrested For Having 86 Wives

IBN reports today that Nigeria's Federal High Court has ordered the unconditional release of Mohammed Bello Abubakar. The 84-year old man had been arrested and charged with "insulting religious" creed and "unlawful marriages" after local Muslim leaders ordered him to divorce 82 of his 86 wives. (See prior posting.) Initially he was arraigned by an Upper Sharia Court in Niger state. Now the Federal High Court has ordered the inspector general of police to give Abubakar protection from local authorities. BBC News reported several days ago that Abubakar had been released on bail, but IBN says he is still in custody. There is no law against polygamy in Nigeria, but Islamic law permits only four wives. The Niger state government says it will appeal the High Court's order. It is one of the Nigerian states that has reintroduced Sharia law.

Court Supervised Election of Buddhist Temple Board Upheld

In Wat Phra Buddha Chinnaraj Buddhist Temple v. Ketpongsuda, (CA Ct. App., Nov. 14, 2008), a California Court of Appeals upheld a trial court's resolution of a dispute over control of a Buddhist Temple in Chino Hills, CA. The trial court found that bylaws adopted in 1996 were the governing instrument and that later revisions were not properly adopted. It went on to order an election of new directors under the 1996 bylaws. The election was supervised by a court-appointed special master. The appellate court found that the court below properly applied "neutral principles of law" in making its determinations, and did not infringe the Temple's free exercise of religion protected by the California constitution.

Seven Amish Men Convicted For Refusing To Use Safety Emblem

After an all-day trial in a Graves County court in Mayfield, Kentucky, seven Amish men were convicted Friday of refusing to use the state-mandated orange "slow-moving vehicle" emblem on their horse-drawn buggies. They were fined a total of $250. Objecting to bright colors, they are willing only to use gray tape, plus lanterns at night. Believing that they should not trust their safety to a man-made symbol, they insist that the tape only outline the back of their buggies. The Louisville Courier-Journal reported yesterday that the defendants, members of the Swartzentruber Amish sect, plan to appeal. They claim that insistence on using the state emblem infringes their free exercise rights, and that their prosecution was discriminatory because the law has not been enforced against slow-moving farm machinery. (See prior related posting.)

Recent On-Topic Scholarly Articles and Book

From SSRN:

Paul Horwitz, The Philosopher's Brief, (Constitutional Commentary, Forthcoming).

Thomas Charles Berg, Religious Organizational Freedom and Conditions on Government Benefits, (Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2009).

Perry Dane, West Virginia State Board of Education V. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), (ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, David Spinoza Tanenhaus, ed., Gale, 2008).

Amelia J. Uelmen, 'It's Hard Work': Reflections on Conscience and Citizenship in the Catholic Tradition, (Journal Catholic Legal Studies, Vol. 47, pp. 317-342, 2008).

From Bepress:

Maurice Adams & Adriaan J. Overbeeke, The Constitutional Relationship between Law and Religion in the History of Ideas: A Contemporary European Perspective, (Global Jurist: Vol. 8 : Iss. 3, 2008)).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere (Constitutional Law issues):

Paul E. McGreal, The Case for a Constitutional Easement Approach to Permanent Monuments in Traditional Public Forums, (Northwestern University Law Review, Oct. 27, 2008).

Susan Gellman & Susan Looper-Friedman, Thou Shalt Use the Equal Protection Clause for Religious Cases (Not Just the Establishment Clause), 10 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 665-743 (2008).

Daniel A. Seeger, Reconciling Religious Faith and Democratic Practice: The Problem of the Elusive Definition of Religion, 84 Notre Dame Law Review 97-109 (2008).

Deborah Jones Merritt & and Daniel C. Merritt, The Future of Religious Pluralism: Justice O'Connor and the Establishment Clause, 39 Arizona State Law Journal 895-948 (2007).

From SmartCILP (Law & Religion):

Marriage, Religion, and the Role of the Civil State. Foreword by Joel A. Nichols; articles by Margaret F. Brinig, Steven L. Nock, Elliot N. Dorff, John Witte, Jr. and Joel A. Nichols. (Links to full text.) 5 University of St. Thomas Law Journal 544-615 (2008).

Liaquat Ali Khan, Advocacy under Islam and Common Law, 45 San Diego Law Review 547-608 (2008).

W. Jesse Weins, Employer Funding of Fertility Awareness Training: Acceptable Alternative to Mandated Prescription Contraceptive Coverage in Employee Benefits, 12 Michigan State University Journal of Medicine & Law 321-339 (2008).

Alfred L. Brophy, How Missionaries Thought: About Property Law, For Instance, 30 University of Hawaii Law Review 373-399 (2008).

Charles R. Foster, Identity and Integrity in Clergy Formation, 5 University of St. Thomas Law Journal 457-469 (2008).

Recent Book:

John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed, Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think, (Gallup Press, March 2008), author interview in Christianity Today.

Will Prince Charles Eventually Have Religiously More Inclusive Title?

According to an article in yesterday in Religious Intelligence, recent reports that Britain's Prince Charles would change the Coronation Oath to make it more multi-faith when he eventually becomes king are unfounded. Britain's monarch is head of the Church of England as well as head of state. Prince Charles has indicated in the past that he would like the king's traditional title, "Defender of the Faith", to be changed to the more inclusive "Defender of Faith"-- omitting "the" from the title. The exact style of the British sovereign has been modified over the years by Parliament. Apparently one way for Charles to accommodate his wishes would be for Parliament to revert to the original Latin form-- "Fidei Defensor." It can be translated either as referring to "faith" or "the faith". Despite the implication to the contrary in the Religious Intelligence article, the Coronation Oath does not appear to contain a reference to the title of the monarch.

Boy At Center of D.C. Hospital's Suit Buried After Heart-Lung Function Ends

AP reported yesterday that 12-year old Motl Brody died Saturday and was buried on Sunday in Brooklyn, NY. Brody was at the center of a pending lawsuit in Washington, D.C. (See prior posting.) Children's National Medical Center was seeking court approval to disconnect the boy's ventilator because he was pronounced brain dead. The religious beliefs of Motl's Orthodox Jewish parents were that life does not end until heart and lung functions cease. Apparently that point was reached Saturday.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

German Professor of Islamic Theolgy Says Muhammad Never Existed

Yesterday's Wall Street Journal reports on Prof. Muhammad Sven Kalisch, head of the Center for Religious Studies at Germany's Munster University. A convert to Islam, Kalisch is Germany's first professor of Islamic theology. Hired to apply Western scholarship to Islamic studies, he has now concluded that the Prophet Muhammad probably never existed. He says this does not mean he is no longer a Muslim. Officials, alarmed at the implications of his scholarship, have removed him as head of a program to train teachers to teach religion to their Muslim students in public schools. Police have told Kalisch to move his Center to a more secure area. The Center has removed a sign identifying its location and has eliminated its address from its website.

Challenge To Religious Workers Visa Provisions Moves Ahead

In Ruiz-Diaz v. United States, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91967 (WD WA, Oct. 31, 2008), a Washington federal district court denied defendants' motion to dismiss a class action brought on behalf of certain foreigners in the United States who are seeking Religious Worker visas and by three religious organizations that employed them. The suit challenges a government regulation (8 CFR 245.2) that precludes applicants from filing for Adjustment of Status before their employer's visa application is approved. Plaintiffs were permitted to move ahead on their due process, equal protection, free exercise and Religious Freedom Restoration Act claims. (See prior related posting.)

Muslim Deli Owner Charges Yonkers Police With Selective Enforcement

A Yonkers, New York delicatessen owner has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against 14 Yonkers police officers. According to Friday's Lower Hudson Journal News, Haifa Tamimi says police engaged in selective enforcement against her of a city ordinance requiring businesses to close between midnight and 6 a.m. She says she was targeted beginning in 2002 because she was a Muslim and an Arab. The lawsuit claims other businesses were not ticketed. Her 24-hour deli did most of its business during the midnight to 6 a.m. shift.

Court Upholds Jurisdiction To Decide Which Faction Controls Church Property

Avondale Church of Christ v. Merrill Lynch, (TN Ct. App., Nov. 10, 2008) involves a dispute between two factions of a congregationally governed church. The dispute developed after the minister selected new leadership for the congregation. A Tennessee state appellate court affirmed the trial court's jurisdiction to decide who should control church funds and property and held that it acted properly in ordering a vote of the membership on that issue. However the trial court lacked jurisdiction to decide the propriety of the dismissal of the church's minister by the faction-- known as the Men's Business Committee-- that won the election or the identity of "church leadership" beyond control of church property.

Recently Available Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Charleston v. Rojas, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91573 (CD IL, Nov. 12, 2008), an Illinois federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that authorities denied his request for a vegan diet for religious reasons. the court found that plaintiff had not exhausted his administrative remedies.

In Berry v. Waushara County Jail, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91540 (ED WI, Nov. 4, 2008), plaintiff alleged that jail authorities violated his rights under the 1st Amendment and RLUIPA by failing to provide him with a Halal diet, refusing to let him order religious items, denying Muslims group worship and forcing him to purchase a Q'uran while Bibles were given out for free. The court allowed plaintiff to proceed in his claim for damages against the jail administrator in his official capacity, but dismissed claims for injunctive relief because plaintiff was now housed in a different facility.

In Means v. Lampert, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92257 (WD OK, Nov. 12, 2008), an Oklahoma federal district court held that an inmate's complaint should be construed to include a RLUIPA claim even though only 1st Amendment claims were initially referenced.

In Mosley v. Campbell, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71454 (ED CA, Aug. 11, 2008), a California federal district court approved a magistrate's recommendation (2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92409, July 15, 2008) to dismiss a Muslim inmate's challenge to prison grooming standards. The court found that plaintiff was not disciplined because he grew his beard, but instead because he "designed" the beard differently from its natural growth.

"Hisba" Lawsuits Growing In Egypt

A story in last Thursday's Middle East Times discusses the growing use of "hisba" lawsuits in Egypt and elsewhere in the Muslim world against bloggers, journalists and intellectuals. As explained in another Middle East Times article last August, hisba lawsuits are an invention of Islamic jurisprudence that permit private individuals to defend matters of faith to hold fellow citizens and the state accountable for upholding religious principles. Egypt's Decree Law 78 gives individuals the right to file lawsuits in cases where an exalted right of God has been violated. Increasingly however political critics are being charged with apostasy under these laws.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Speeches and Declaration From UN Sessions On Interreligious Understanding

The United Nations has released a summary of all the remarks made by world leaders at the Nov. 12-13 "Culture of Peace" meeting of the General Assembly called to discuss interreligious dialogue. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's opening statement at a press conference following the sessions thanked Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah for initiating the conference. The Secretary General also read the Declaration adopted by the participants. It stated in part:

Concerned about serious instances of intolerance, discrimination, hatred expressions, and harassment of minority religious communities of all faiths, participating states underlined the importance of promoting dialogue, understanding, and tolerance among human beings, as well as respect for all their diverse religions, cultures and beliefs. Participating states affirmed their rejection of the use of religion to justify the killing of innocent people and actions of terrorism, violence and coercion, which directly contradict the commitment of all religions to peace, justice and equality.

(See prior related posting.)

Indiana School's Released Time Program Challenged In Court

The Ft. Wayne (IN) Journal Gazette reported yesterday on a federal lawsuit filed by the Indiana ACLU challenging a Huntington Indiana elementary school's "released time" program. The suit brought on behalf of parents of an 8-year old argues that the school district has violated the Establishment Clause by supporting the voluntary religious instruction program that is offered during school hours in church-owned mobile trailers parked in Horace Mann Elementary School's parking lot. The trailers use the school's electricity, students are escorted to the trailers by their teachers, and students who elect not to participate go to their school classroom but receive no alternative programming.

Diocese Repudiates Priest Who Told Obama Voters To Seek Penance

ABC News today reports on an unusual public repudiation by the Catholic Diocese of Charleston, South Carolina of statements made by a Greenville, SC priest, Father Jay Scott Newman . Last week Newman wrote in his church newsletter that any Catholic who voted for Barack Obama needed to seek penance before again taking communion. He said: "Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exits constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ's Church and under the judgment of divine law. Persons in this condition should not receive Holy Communion until and unless they are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Penance, lest they eat and drink their own condemnation."

Monsignor Martin T. Laughlin, Administrator of the Diocese of Charleston, issued a statement yesterday reading in part:

This past week, the Catholic Church’s clear, moral teaching on the evil of abortion has been pulled into the partisan political arena. The recent comments of Father Jay Scott Newman ... have diverted the focus from the Church’s clear position against abortion.... [L]et me state with clarity that Father Newman’s statements do not adequately reflect the Catholic Church’s teachings. Any comments or statements to the contrary are repudiated....

Christ gives us freedom to explore our own conscience and to make our own decisions while adhering to the law of God and the teachings of the faith. Therefore, if a person has formed his or her conscience well, he or she should not be denied Communion, nor be told to go to confession before receiving Communion.... We should all come together to support the President-elect and all elected officials with a view to influencing policy in favor of the protection of the unborn child.

Focus Continues on Mormon Leadership of Proposition 8 Campaign

The AP reports that Fred Karger, founder of Californians Against Hate, filed a complaint Thursday with the California Fair Political Practices Commission. It alleges that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints failed to report the full value of its in-kind contributions to the campaign in support of California's Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage. Meanwhile today's New York Times ran an article detailing the extensive funding and volunteer efforts by members of the Mormon Church in the campaign for Proposition 8. Leaders were careful to keep the activities volunteer ones that did not formally involve the Church. But, according to the Times, "Proposition 8, was to many Mormons a kind of firewall to be held at all costs." (See prior posting.) [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Marines Sued By Contractor Whose Car Decals Were Banned On Base

Last Monday, Jesse Nieto, a Marine veteran who works as a civilian at Camp Lejuene Marine base in North Carolina, filed suit against military officials challenging their order that he remove various anti-Islamic decals from his car that he drives to work. Nieto's son was killed in the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole. The Base Magistrate issued a written order barring Nieto's car from the base and all other federal installations until all the decals were removed. This had the effect of also barring him from using his car to visit his son's grave at Arlington Cemetery.

According to an AP report today, Camp Lejeune's Equal Employment Opportunity office received several complaints that Nieto's decals were offensive. The suit reveals that among the offensive decals were one that read: "Islam = Terrorism"; and another that read: "Disgrace My Countries Flag. And I will SHIT On Your Quran." Even after the most offensive decals were removed, officers insisted that he remove others as well. The federal court complaint (full text) alleges that these orders violated Nieto's free speech and equal protection rights. It argues that the orders are not viewpoint neutral. A Nov. 12 release by the Thomas More Law Center that represents Nieto says that the orders are "political correctness run amuck."

NC Senator-Elect Drops Defamation Suit Over "Godless Americans" Ads

Kay Hagan, winner in the recent election of the U.S. Senate race in North Carolina, has dropped her defamation lawsuit filed just before the election against incumbent Sen. Elizabeth Dole. CNN reported yesterday on Hagan's decision to focus on economic issues facing the country instead of pursuing the lawsuit that challenged election ads Dole ran against Hagan questioning her religious beliefs. The challenged ads attempted to identify Hagan with members of the Godless Americans Political Action Committee who attended a fund raiser for Hagan. Hagan is an elder of the Presbyterian church and a Sunday school teacher. (See prior posting.)

Colorado Governor Sued Over Day of Prayer Proclamations

In Colorado, the Freedom from Religion Foundation and several of its members filed a lawsuit in state court last Wednesday challenging Gov. Jim Ritter Jr.'s practice of issuing National Day of Prayer proclamations. The complaint (full text) alleges that the proclamations and related celebrations amount to governmental endorsement of religion in violation Art. II, Sec. 4 of Colorado's Constitution. The Daily Kenoshan reports on the lawsuit. Other suits challenging day of prayer proclamations were filed earlier this year in Wisconsin and Texas. (See prior postings 1, 2.)

Court Says It Can Decide On Validity of Board Expansion By Jewish School

In Schwimmer v Welz, (NY App. Civ., Nov. 12, 2008), a New York appellate court held that a civil court could decide whether an amendment to the certificate of incorporation expanding the number of board members of United Talmudic Academy of Boro Park, and the election of new board members under those amendments, were valid. The court said that even though the Academy is a religious corporation, deciding the case does not turn on religious issues: "Membership on the Board is not conditioned upon any religious criteria, and the issues raised with respect to the challenged status of the various individuals claiming to be Board members concern only notice requirements, requisites for the conduct of Board meetings and elections, and requirements for amending corporate documents." The case was remanded to the trial court for it to join additional necessary parties. [Thanks to J.J. Landa for the lead.]

Friday, November 14, 2008

Bush Speaks At U.N. Session On Interfaith Cooperation

Yesterday, President George W. Bush spoke (full text of remarks) at the United Nations High-Level Debate on Interfaith Dialogue. Here are some excerpts:

One of my core beliefs is that there is an Almighty God -- and that every man, woman, and child on the face of this Earth bears His image. Many years ago, faith changed my life. Faith has sustained me through the challenges and the joys of my Presidency. And faith will guide me for the rest of my days....

Freedom is God's gift to every man, woman, and child -- and that freedom includes the right of all people to worship as they see fit. Sixty years ago, members of the United Nations General Assembly acknowledged this truth when we adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights....

Our nation was founded by people seeking haven from religious persecution.... And through the generations, our nation has helped defend the religious liberty of others -- from liberating the concentration camps of Europe, to protecting Muslims in places like Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

Today, the United States is carrying on that noble tradition by making religious liberty a central element of our foreign policy. We've established a Commission on the International Religious Freedom to monitor the state of religious liberty worldwide. We strongly encourage nations to understand that religious freedom is the foundation of a healthy and hopeful society. We're not afraid to stand with religious dissidents and believers who practice their faith, even where it is unwelcome.

The U.N. session was initiated by Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah. (See prior posting.)