Deference Given To Hierarchical Determination in Church Property Dispute

In Choi v. Sung, (WA Ct. App., Feb. 2, 2010), a Washington state court of appeals upheld a trial court's resolution of a dispute between two factions of the New Hope Christian Reformed Church of Tacoma regarding ownership of church property. The courts enforced the decision of the denomination's Classis regarding the dispute. The trial court's findings on whether New Hope CRC was a congregational or hierarchical church were somewhat ambiguous. However the trial court's conclusions treat the church as hierarchical, and the court of appeals held that there was substantial evidence to support that approach.

Secretary of State, President Speak At National Prayer Breakfast

This morning the 58th Annual National Prayer Breakfast was held in Washington, D.C. One of the keynote speakers was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. (Full text of speech.) Her remarks included some rather blunt criticism of the misuse of religion:

All religions have their version of the Golden Rule and direct us to love our neighbor and welcome the stranger and visit the prisoner.... Yet across the world, we see organized religion standing in the way of faith, perverting love, undermining that message.

Sometimes it's easier to see that far away than here at home. But religion, cloaked in naked power lust, is used to justify horrific violence, attacks on homes, markets, schools, volleyball games, churches, mosques, synagogues, temples. From Iraq to Pakistan and Afghanistan to Nigeria and the Middle East, religion is used a club to deny the human rights of girls and women, from the Gulf to Africa to Asia, and to discriminate, even advocating the execution of gays and lesbians. Religion is used to enshrine in law intolerance of free expression and peaceful protest. Iran is now detaining and executing people under a new crime – waging war against God. It seems to be a rather dramatic identity crisis.

So in the Obama Administration, we are working to bridge religious divides. We’re taking on violations of human rights perpetrated in the name of religion. And we invite members of Congress and clergy and active citizens like all of you here to join us.... We are committed, not only to reaching out and speaking up about the perversion of religion, and in particularly the use of it to promote and justify terrorism, but also seeking to find common ground. We are working with Muslim nations to come up with an appropriate way of demonstrating criticism of religious intolerance without stepping over into the area of freedom of religion or non-religion and expression.

President Barack Obama also spoke at length at the National Prayer Breakfast. (Full text of remarks.) Spotlighting the American people's response to the recent earthquake in Haiti, he said:

This is what we do, as Americans, in times of trouble. We unite, recognizing that such crises call on all of us to act, recognizing that there but for the grace of God go I, recognizing that life's most sacred responsibility -- one affirmed, as Hillary said, by all of the world's great religions -- is to sacrifice something of ourselves for a person in need.

Sadly, though, that spirit is too often absent when tackling the long-term, but no less profound issues facing our country and the world. Too often, that spirit is missing without the spectacular tragedy ... that can shake us out of complacency. We become numb to the day-to-day crises, the slow-moving tragedies of children without food and men without shelter and families without health care. We become absorbed with our abstract arguments, our ideological disputes, our contests for power. And in this Tower of Babel, we lose the sound of God's voice.

As urged by a number of people, Obama also spoke out against the harsh anti-gay legislation recently proposed in Uganda, reportedly at the urging of the same group that sponsored the Prayer Breakfast. (See prior posting.) The President said:

We may disagree about the best way to reform our health care system, but surely we can agree that no one ought to go broke when they get sick in the richest nation on Earth. We can take different approaches to ending inequality, but surely we can agree on the need to lift our children out of ignorance; to lift our neighbors from poverty. We may disagree about gay marriage, but surely we can agree that it is unconscionable to target gays and lesbians for who they are -- whether it's here in the United States or, as Hillary mentioned, more extremely in odious laws that are being proposed most recently in Uganda.

Court Refuses Interlocutory Appeal In Establishment Clause Challenge To AIG Bailout

In Murray v. Geithner, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8415 (ED MI, Feb. 2, 2010), a Michigan federal district court denied the government's motion to certify for interlocutory appeal the court's May 2009 holding that plaintiffs have standing to challenge on Establishment Clause grounds the federal bailout of the giant insurance company AIG. The lawsuit claims that AIG's involvement in Sharia-compliant financing means that federal funds are supporting Islamic religious activity. The court also refused to certify for interlocutory appeal its denial of of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.

Court Dismisses Challenge To Removal of Children From Tony Alamo Compound

In Tony Alamo Christian Ministries v. Selig, (WD AR, Feb. 2, 2010), an Arkansas federal district court dismissed a lawsuit charging that plaintiffs' constitutional rights of religious liberty were violated when certain children of members of the Tony Alamo Christian Ministries were removed from their parents by child welfare officials and adjudicated dependent-neglected under state law in state court. Invoking the Younger v. Harris abstention doctrine, the court held that plaintiffs can raise their claims in ongoing dependency-neglect proceedings pending in state court. Yesterday's Washington Post reported on the decision.

Brazilian Court Overturns Ban on Religious Symbols In Rio's Carnival

In 2007, municipal officials in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil banned the display of religious symbols during the city's annual Carnival that marks the beginning of Lent. The Carnival's street parade, which draws thousands of tourists, has regularly featured near-naked women and fantasy images. AFP reported yesterday that judges in Rio have overturned the ban on religious symbols holding that it violates freedom of expression and is a form of censorship. However the Independent League of Samba Schools which organizes the annual Carnival parades says it will observe a national law prohibiting the public vilification of religious objects. In the 1980's some floats featured sexually suggestive images of Jesus.

BBC Follows Indonesian Sharia Police On Patrol

BBC News on Tuesday posted an interesting 3 minute account by reporter Karishma Vaswani as she joined the Sharia police on patrol in Aceh, Indonesia one Saturday evening as they hunted out immoral activities.

France Denies Citizenship To Muslim Man Who Forces Wife To Wear Face Veil

France's minister for immigration Eric Besson has issued a decree denying an application for French citizenship from a Muslim man because he does not respect the values of the Republic. Yesterday's Irish Times reports that the man needed citizenship to settle in France with his French wife. Besson said in a statement:

It became apparent during the investigation and the prior interview that this person was compelling his wife to wear the all-covering veil, depriving her of the freedom to come and go with her face uncovered, and rejected the principles of secularism and equality between men and women.

Prime Minister Francois Fillon says he intends to sign the decree after consulting with the council of state as required by French law. Fillon said that the full-face veil "has no place in our country."

British Jews Unable To Develop Consensus For Legislative Change To School Admissions

JTA reported yesterday that Britain's Jewish community is divided on seeking a legislative change to reverse the UK Supreme Court's decision last December holding that Jewish schools could not use the traditional definition of who is Jewish for purposes of admissions. (See prior posting.) All denominations within the Jewish community are distressed that the court rejected a definition linked to religious law. However the non-Orthodox Jewish movements want any legislation to require Orthodox Jewish schools to accept converts from the Liberal and Reform branches of Judaism as well. The Orthodox movement is unwilling to accept this. The umbrella organization for British Jews, the Board of Deputies, has decided that without consensus it will just take a wait-and-see approach and watch how implementation of the court's ruling plays out.

Court Says Divorced Parents Must Share Religious Decisions For Children

In In re Marriage of Balashov, (WA Ct. App., Feb. 1, 2010), a Washington state appellate court reversed the portion of a trial court's parenting plan entered in a divorce action. The trial court ordered that the major decisions regarding each of the two children are to be made jointly by the parents, except that the mother alone was to make decisions regarding their religious upbringing. The mother had raised the children in the Orthodox Christian faith, while the father had no religious affiliation. The Court of Appeals held that the parenting plan must give the same joint decision making to both parents on religious upbringing of the children as for other matters. It said:

To protect parents' respective constitutional rights to the free exercise of religion, Washington courts hold that a parent's decision-making authority with respect to religious upbringing may not be restricted unless there is "a substantial showing of actual or potential harm to the children from exposure to the parents' conflicting religious beliefs." In re Marriage of Jensen-Branch, 78 Wn. App. 482, 490, 899 P.2d 803 (1995). The court emphasized that "religious beliefs" should be interpreted in the broad sense of "world view" and that a parent's lack of religious belief receives the same amount of protection as any particular religious belief.

Federal Lawsuit Challenges Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009

A federal lawsuit was filed yesterday challenging the constitutionality of the recently-enacted Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009. The complaint (full text) in Glenn v. Holder, (ED MI, filed 2/2/2010), claims that the provisions of the act which criminalizes bias crimes motivated by the victim's actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity "elevates those engaged in certain deviant sexual behaviors to a special, protected class of persons under federal law." After quoting a number of Biblical verses on homosexuality, the complaint argues that the Act violates the 1st, 5th and 10th Amendments and exceeds Congress' power under the Commerce Clause.

Brought on behalf of three Christian pastors and the head of the American Family Association of Michigan, the complaint asserts that the Act "is an effort to eradicate religious beliefs opposing the homosexual agenda from the marketplace of ideas by demonizing, vilifying, and criminalizing such beliefs as a matter of federal law and policy." It claims that the federal aiding and abetting statute, along with the substantive provisions of the Hate Crimes Act, will subject plaintiffs to federal questioning, investigation and prosecution for preaching God's word.

The Thomas Moore Law Center, which represents plaintiffs, issued a long press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit. The lawsuit raises arguments that were debated at length during Congress' consideration of the bill. Proponents argued then that several provisions included in the bill adequately protect freedom of speech and religion. (See prior posting.)

European Human Rights Court Says Religion on Identity Cards Violates ECHR

In Sinan Isik v. Turkey [in French], (Eur. Ct. Hum. Rts., Feb. 2, 2010), the European Court of Human Rights, by a vote of 6-1, upheld a complaint by petitioner that the government of Turkey refused to replace "Islam" on his identity card with "Alevi." Before 2006, Turkish identity cards were required to indicate religious identity. Now they may be left blank. The court held that both the pre-2006 practice and the current one violate Art. 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (freedom of thought, conscience and religion). The court held that the current requirement of applying to authorities to have the religious identification block left blank, as well as including religion on identity cards for any reason, violate the principle that one cannot be required to manifest one's religion or belief. A press release from the Court in English summarizes the court's holding. Today's Zaman reports on the decision.

Churches Have Some Greater Copyright Leeway This Year for Super Bowl Parties

Once again this year, churches are looking carefully at copyright rules as they plan their annual Super Bowl Parties for next Sunday. (See prior related posting.) Yesterday's Christian Post reports that the NFL adopted new Guidelines last year to ease limitations on churches showing the copyrighted Super Bowl Game. Churches are no longer limited to projecting the game on screens of 55 inches or less. Now they can use bigger screens and sound equipment so long as those are used regularly in their ministry. Churches may not charge admission for the showing, but can take up a collection to defray expenses of the party. Finally churches are encouraged to call their events something other than a "Super Bowl" party. The NFL continues to send cease and desist letters to venues other than churches that plan to show the Super Bowl on large screens. The Super Bowl is presumably attracting greater attention than usual in some churches because of the expected anti-abortion ad featuring Tim Tebow that will be aired during the game. (See prior posting.)

Obama Urged To Use Prayer Breakfast To Denounce Ugandan Anti-Gay Bill

The National Prayer Breakfast, scheduled for Thursday in Washington, D.C., is drawing more controversy than usual this year. Every U.S. President since Dwight Eisenhower has spoken at the Breakfast. Beliefnet yesterday reported that this year, gay-rights leaders, including a member of the White House faith advisory council, are urging President Obama to use the Breakfast to speak out against repressive anti-gay legislation pending in the Parliament of Uganda. (See prior posting.) The sponsor of the Breakfast-- the Fellowship Foundation, also known as The Family-- has been accused of inspiring the Ugandan legislation. Progressive religious groups will hold an alternative American Prayer Hour in 17 cities to protest the Washington event.

Meanwhile American Atheists joined other groups in urging the President and other key political leaders such as Sen. Harry Reid, to completely boycott the National Prayer Breakfast this year.

Oregon Jury Convicts Parents In Faith Healing Death

According to KGW News8 Portland, yesterday in Oregon City, Oregon, a state court jury by a 10-2 vote convicted Jeff and Marci Beagley of criminally negligent homicide in the death of their 16-year old son. The Beagleys are members of the Followers of Christ Church which avoids doctors. The parents failed to get medical care for their son who died of complications from a congenital urinary tract blockage. Instead they prayed for him to heal. They testified that they did not know their son's condition was life threatening.

IRS Church Inquiry Rules Do Not Apply In Personal Tax Investigation

In Pennington v. United States, (WD TX, Jan. 29, 2010), a Texas federal district court refused to quash an IRS summons for bank records of a religious organization, Anchor Group. The records are titled in the name of the group's treasurer, James Pennington. The court held that the summons does not violate provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relating to church tax inquiries (IRC Sec. 7611) because it was issued as part of the investigation of the personal tax liability of James and Lisa Pennington, not the liability of the religious organization.

Suits Charges FFRF Sign In Capitol Violated Establishment Clause

Last December as part of the holiday displays in the Illinois state capitol building, officials allowed the Freedom From Religion Foundation to put up a sign calling religion a "myth and superstition." It was placed next to a Christmas tree and near a nativity scene that were also on display. William J. Kelly, a conservative activist and candidate for state comptroller attempted unsuccessfully to take down the sign. (See prior posting.) Now, according to Courthouse News Service, Kelly has sued the Illinois Secretary of State claiming that allowing the FFRF sign violated the Establishment Clause. The complaint (full text) in Kelly v. White, (ND IL, filed 1/28/10), says that a similar sign will likely be permitted in future years unless the court bars it. Plaintiff argues that state regulations prohibit posting of "signs" as opposed to other kinds of displays, and that the sign violates the Establishment Clause because "it is hostile and inflammatory to all religions." [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Maryland Tells Condo To Stop Removal of Shabbat Elevator Pending Probe

Last year, after a finding of probable cause by the Maryland Commission on Human Relations, the Strathmore Tower Condominiums in Baltimore (MD) modified one of its elevators to accommodate Orthodox Jewish residents. The owner of one of the condos covered the cost of retrofitting it for "Shabbat mode"-- each Saturday it stops automatically on each floor so Sabbath observant Jews do not need to press elevator buttons. (See prior posting.) However, now JTA reports that on January 17, the condominium board voted to remove the Shabbat mode software and hardware. In response, last week the Maryland Commission on Human Relations ordered the condo board to rescind its action pending an investigation by the Commission. The elevator has been an issue between Orthodox Jewish and African American residents of the condo for the last three years. [Thanks to Joel Katz (Relig. & State in Israel) for the lead.]

Hawaiian House Tables Civil Union Bill Under Pressure From Christian Conservatives

Baptist Press yesterday reported that opposition from Christian conservatives was largely responsible for Friday's vote in Hawaii's House of Representatives to postpone consideration indefinitely on HB 444, a bill that would have authorized same-sex civil unions in the state To the surprise of many, the decision was made by voice vote after a Democratic caucus on the issue. Two weeks ago, some 15,000 religious conservatives rallied in the Hawaiian capital in opposition to the bill.

Pope Criticizes Pending British Equality Bill

Pope Benedict XVI yesterday, while confirming he would be making an Apostolic visit to Great Britain in September, challenged the Equality Bill now working its way through Britain's Parliament. Yesterday's London Times reports on the Pope's remarks (full text) to the bishops of England and Wales who were completing their five-year "ad limina" visit to Rome. The Pope said in part:

Your country is well known for its firm commitment to equality of opportunity for all members of society. Yet as you have rightly pointed out, the effect of some of the legislation designed to achieve this goal has been to impose unjust limitations on the freedom of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs. In some respects it actually violates the natural law upon which the equality of all human beings is grounded and by which it is guaranteed.... Continue to insist upon your right to participate in national debate through respectful dialogue with other elements in society.... [W]hen so many of the population claim to be Christian, how could anyone dispute the Gospel’s right to be heard?

Both the Catholic bishops and the Church of England have been concerned that the Equality Bill will require churches to employ gays and transsexuals or to admit women to the priesthood. In recent weeks, the House of Lords has agreed to broader exemptions than those originally proposed for religious organizations. (See prior posting.) Now the Church of England and the bishops will work together to prevent the European Commission from pressuring Britain to again narrow those exemptions.

Court Confirms Assets That Belong To Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh

In Calvary Episcopal Church v. Duncan, (PA Com. Pl., Jan. 29, 2010), a Pennsylvania trial court implemented its earlier decision on ownership of assets of the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh. (See prior posting.) The decision is summarized by Episcopal News Service:

Common Pleas Judge Joseph M. James accepted as accurate an inventory of diocesan property submitted by a "special master" he had appointed earlier and told Duncan's organization it must transfer the assets.

The inventory includes $22 million in cash, cash equivalents, receivables, and investments including about $2.5 million in pooled parish investments and real estate and other real property.

"The diocese plans to quickly make arrangements so that all parishes may again have access to their investment funds that were frozen by financial institutions during the legal proceedings," according to a news release from the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh.

Suit Claims Police Destroyed Mystical Qualities of Medicine Bag

A Portland, Oregon man, Craig Clark Show, filed suit on January 17 against the Idaho State Police and the Bonner County, Idaho, Sheriff's Office, alleging that the police destroyed the mystical qualities of his medicine bag when they opened it after Show was stopped for speeding on his motorcycle. According to Friday's Bonner County Daily Bee, Show says the medicine bag imparts protection after it was blessed by a medicine woman and sealed in 1995. Apparently police were searching for drugs.

Ten U.S. Southern Baptists Arrested In Haiti For Attempting To Take Children For Adoption

Ten Southern Baptists, mostly from two churches in Idaho, have been arrested in Haiti for attempting to illegally take 33 children out of the country that has been severely damaged by the recent earthquake. Yesterday's Canadian Press reported that a hearing is scheduled for the Americans today. Haiti's government has stopped all adoptions that were not in process before the earthquake, concerned about trafficking in lost or orphaned children. Some of the 33 children involved still have parents. They thought the children were being taken on an extended vacation away from the earthquake devastation.

The Idaho churches involved had plans before the earthquake to create a shelter for Haitian and Dominican orphans at a beach resort in the Dominican Republic that would attract adoptive parents from the U.S. When the earthquake struck, the churches decided to move more quickly than they had previously planned. The group's spokesperson said they did not think they needed government permission to take the children out of the country, and only had the children's best interests at heart. Rev. Clint Henry of the Central Valley Baptist Church said: "we believe that Christ has asked us to take the gospel of Jesus Christ to the whole world, and that includes children."

Indian Supreme Court Says Civil Service Rules Trump Muslim Personal Law

According to today's New Delhi Pioneer, a two-judge panel of the Supreme Court of India last week held that civil service rules of the state of Rajasthan barring any state employee from taking a second wife without permission of the state takes precedence over the Muslim Personal Law that allows Muslim men to have a second wife. Liyakat Ali, a former constable in the Rajasthan Police, was fired in 1986 and has been in litigation over the civil service ban ever since. Muslim leaders say the Supreme Court's ruling interferes with the religious rights of the Muslim community.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Stuart P. Green, Review Essay: Golden Rule Ethics and the Death of the Criminal Law's Special Part, (Crime and Culpability: A Gheory of Criminal Law, Larry Alexander, Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, Stephen Morse, eds., Cambridge University Press, 358 pp., 2009 ).
• Thomas M. Mengler, Why Should a Catholic Law School Be Catholic?, (Journal of Catholic Social Thought, Vol. 6, 2010).
• Robert K. Vischer, Whom Should a Catholic Law School Honor?: If Confusion is the Concern, Context Matters, (Journal of Catholic Legal Studies, 2010).
• Andrew M. M. Koppelman, The New American Civil Religion: Lesson for Italy, (George Washington International Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Robert K. Vischer, Conscience and the Common Good, (Journal of Catholic Legal Studies, 2010).
• Tally Kritzman, 'Otherness' as the Underlying Principle in Israel's Asylum Regime, (Israel Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 603-627, 2010).
• Gregory Sobolski & Matt Steinberg, An Empirical Analysis of Section 1983 Qualified Immunity Actions and Implications of Pearson v. Callahan, (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 62, pg. 523, 2010).
• Dan Ernst, The Meaning and Liberal Justifications of Israel's Law of Return, (Israel Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 564-603, 2010).

From SmartCILP:

• Jonathan D. Boyer, Education Tax Credits: School Choice Initiatives Capable of Surmounting Blaine Amendments, 43 Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems 117-149 (2009).
• Moeen H. Cheema & Abdul-Rahman Mustafa, From the Hudood Ordinances to the Protection of Women Act: Islamic Critiques of the Hudood Laws of Pakistan, 8 UCLA Journal of Islamic & Near Eastern Law 1-48 (2008-2009).
• Michael Cobb, Pioneers, Probate, Polygamy, and You, 11 Journal of Law & Family Studies 275-302 (2009), 2009 Utah Law Review 323-350. [Abstract].
• John F. Scarpa Conference on Law, Politics, and Culture. Introduction by Patrick McKinley Brennan; articles by Kent Greenawalt, Richard Schenk, John T. McGreevy, Jesse H. Choper, Geoffrey R. Stone, Patrick McKinley Brennan and Richard W. Garnett; reply by Martha Nussbaum. 54 Villanova Law Review 579-701 (2009).
• Symposium. The Maryland Constitutional Law Schmooze. Foreword by Mark A. Graber; articles by David Gray, Lief H. Carter, David Bogen, Leslie F. Goldstein, Beau Breslin, Samuel J. Levine, Henry L. Chambers, Jr., Marci A. Hamilton, Carol Nackenoff and Frederick Mark Gedicks. 69 Maryland Law Review 8-161 (2009).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Allison v. Martin, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4928 (ED MI, Jan. 22, 2010), a Michigan federal district court adopted recommendations of a federal magistrate (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123727, Nov. 5, 2009), and rejected various free exercise and RFRA claims by an inmate who objected to the lack of Jewish religious services, wanted religious materials and claims he was denied participation in the prison's kosher meals program.

In Sareini v. Burnett, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4925 (ED MI, Jan. 22, 2010), a Michigan federal district court adopted recommendations of a federal magistrate (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123726, Dec. 21, 2009) granting summary judgement on some claims and denying it on others in a case in which a Shi'a Muslim inmate complained about restrictions on his religious exercise. The court dismissed a complaint that no separate Shi'a religious services were offered, but refused to dismiss claims seeking Halal meat, asking to be allowed to have certain religious items and accommodating observance of Muslim holidays.

In Mayo v. Norris, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5243 (ED AR, Jan. 22, 2010), an Arkansas federal district court adopted the recommendations of a federal magistrate (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123899, Dec. 18, 2009) and rejected a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by petitioner who objected on religious grounds both to his conditions of parole and his underlying conviction (after a negotiated guilty plea) for possessing methamphetamine. Petitioner quoted various Biblical verses that he said were inconsistent with the requirement he maintain a residence and not associate with convicted felons. He also argued that his sentence was harsher than what God's judgment would have been.

In Wilkerson v. Jenkins, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6602 (D MD, Jan. 27, 2010), a Maryland federal district court rejected an inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to wear his yarmulke outside his housing unit and that his work assignment interfered with his observance of the Sabbath.

In Ivory v. Tilton, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6557 (ED CA, Jan. 8, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge, while permitting plaintiff to proceed with retaliation and excessive force claims held that "plaintiff's allegations that 'Defendants' in general harassed him, called him Kosher boy in front of other inmates, both under heated and burned his food, deprived him of his Kosher meals on several occasions, and failed to provide him with proper eating utensils are not sufficient to state any claims." Plaintiff was granted leave to amend on the dismissed claims.

In Scott v. Padula, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6174 (D. SC, Jan. 26, 2010) a federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6173, Jan. 7, 2010), and denied a preliminary injunction to an inmate who wanted to have religious books pertaining to the Shetaut Neter faith while he is housed in the Special Management Unit.

In Lockamy v. Dunbar, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6893 (ED TX, Jan. 28, 2010), a federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124184, Oct. 6, 2009), and, among other things, rejected a RLUIPA challenge to application of prison contraband rules that precluded plaintiff from mailing religious articles torn out of a magazine (as opposed to sending the entire magazine) and a Christmas card that had been made from the back covers of copies of a prison publication.

In Yisrayl v. Walker, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6785 (SD IL, Jan. 27, 2010), an Illinois federal district court permitted an inmate who practices the African Hebrew Israelite faith to proceed on some of his claims-- that officials refused to serve him unleavened bread, refused to serve him a special holiday meal, denied him access to religious books, videos and a turban and have not hired a clergy member of his faith.

Parental Rights Terminated For 13 Children From Alamo Ministries Compound

On Thursday, a Miller County, Arkansas trial judge terminated the parental rights of six members of the Tony Alamo Christian Ministries. Thirteen children from four families are involved. The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reports that the children were taken into protective custody by the state in 2008 in an investigation of physical and sexual abuse at the Ministries' compound. (See prior posting.) A judge ruled that parents could be reunited with their children if they moved off church property and found jobs outside the Alamo Ministries so they are not financially dependent on it. (See prior posting.) The parents involve in Thursday's cases failed to move away. More details are unknown because the judge has imposed a gag order barring parents, attorneys and others from speaking to the press about the case. However a spokesperson for a parents rights group says that the rulings are unduly harsh because Ministries leader Tony Alamo is now in prison where he will likely spend the rest of his life. (See prior posting.) Parents say they will appeal Thursday's rulings. Also other appeals of removal of various of the children from the Tony Alamo compound are pending. The Arkansas Department of Human Services said that normally children would not be put up for adoption until all the appeals have been resolved.

Tennessee Adopts Curriculum Guidelines For High School Bible Courses

According to AP, last week the Tennessee State Board of Education approved guidelines for elective high school social studies courses teaching about the Bible and its historical content. The guidelines implement legislation passed in 2008 authorizing creation of a course focusing on "nonsectarian nonreligious academic study of the Bible and its influence on literature, art, music, culture and politics." (See prior posting.) A Tennessee ACLU spokesperson said the new guidelines appear sensitive to concerns that the classes not be used to try to covert students. The legislation did not require districts with existing Bible courses to move to the state curriculum. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Muslim Organization Objects To Remarks In Speech By California Mayor

The Council on American-Islamic Relations plans to file a complaint with the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division over the State of the City speech given this week by Lancaster, California's mayor, R. Rex Parris. Yesterday's Fresno Bee reports that in the speech, Parris said that he is "growing a Christian community," and urged voters to support a ballot measure in April that would endorse prayer at city meetings.

Rifqa Bary's Parents Seek to Withdraw Settlement Consent Entered Last Week

Last week, it seemed like the case of Rifqa Bary was finally over. Her Muslim parents agreed that the 17-year old girl who fled, fearing her life was in danger because of her conversion to Christianity, could stay with her Ohio foster family, and that everyone would get counseling. (See prior posting.) According to today's Columbus Dispatch, however, that agreement has been short-lived. Claiming misrepresentations and fraudulent inducement, Rifqa's parents now want to withdraw their consent to the deal, claiming that Franklin County (OH) Children's Services is improperly allowing Rifqa to have contact with Blake and Beverly Lorenz, the people in Florida who helped Rifqa run away. The parents say that Rifqa's attorney sent Rifqa's handwritten birthday card to Blake Lorenz for Rifqa. The card referred to Blake as "daddy". Rifqa's parents have now asked for Rifqa's Ohio foster parents to be removed as guardian ad litem.

FFRF Objects To Planned Mother Teresa Postage Stamp

A month ago, the United States Postal Service announced the commemorative postage stamps it plans to issue during 2010. One of the stamps will honor 1979 Nobel Peace Prize winner, Mother Teresa, a nun who worked among the impoverished in Calcutta, India. According to yesterday's Oregon Faith Report, the Freedom from Religion Foundation is objecting to the stamp because Mother Teresa is a religious figure. In response, Pacific Justice Institute will be sending a letter to the USPS offering legal support for the stamp.

North Carolina County's Sectarian Prayers Violate Establishment Clause

In Joyner v. Forsyth County, North Carolina, (MD NC, Jan. 28, 2010), a North Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (see prior posting) and concluded that the Forsyth County Board of Commissioners' invocation policy, as implemented, violates the Establishment Clause. The court found that the prayers offered at Board meetings advance one particular faith and have the effect of affiliating the Board with that faith. The court said that going forward, the county has three options: (1) do not open meetings with prayers; (2) open meetings with non-sectarian prayers; or (3) implement an invocation policy that involves diversity and inclusiveness in the prayers offered. ACLU of North Carolina issued a release approving of the decision. AP reported on the decision.

Air Force Academy Adds Chapel Space For Earth-Centered Faiths; Talks With Secular Student Group

The U.S. Air Force Academy Chapel is adding a worship area for followers of Earth-centered religions, such as Wicca and Druidism. A release from the Academy reports that dedication of the new outdoor worship circle on the hill overlooking the Cadet Chapel and Visitor Center is tentatively scheduled for March 10. This will be the latest addition to sacred spaces already set aside for Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim and Buddhist worship. [Thanks to Rev. Jeanene Hammers for the lead.]

Meanwhile, the Colorado Springs Independent yesterday reported [scroll down] that the Air Force Academy's Freethinkers group has apparently gained consent of administrators to affiliate with national Secular Student Alliance and move out from the Academy's Special Programs In Religious Education. The move came after SPIRE discouraged the group last spring from officially inviting atheist Christopher Hitchens. (Background.) Instead Hitchens met off campus with cadets. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

DHS Secretary Meets With Faith and Ethnic Leaders

A press release from the Department of Homeland Security reports that DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano met yesterday with leaders from Muslim, Sikh, South Asian and Arab communities. The meeting focused on ways that DHS can increase engagement, dialogue and coordination with, and enhance information sharing between, the Department and faith- and community-based groups.

Court Says Pastor's Defamation Is Not Barred By 1st Amendment

In Tubra v. Cooke, (OR App., Jan. 27, 2010), an Oregon appellate court reversed a trial court's judgment notwithstanding the verdict in an interim pastor's defamation claim against his former church and two of its officers. The jury had awarded damages to the pastor, but the trial court held that the First Amendment deprived it of jurisdiction. Disagreeing, the Court of Appeals said:

If the organization is of a religious character, and the alleged defamatory statements relate to the organization's religious beliefs and practices and are of a kind that can only be classified as religious, then the statements are purely religious as a matter of law, and the Free Exercise Clause bars the plaintiff's claim. In defamation law terms, those statements enjoy an absolute privilege.

If, however, the statements--although made by a religious organization--do not concern the religious beliefs and practices of the religious organization, or are made for a nonreligious purpose--that is, if they would not "always and in every context" be considered religious in nature--then the First Amendment does not necessarily prevent adjudication of the defamation claim, but the statements may nonetheless be qualifiedly privileged under established Oregon law.

In this case, the alleged defamatory statements--that the pastor had misappropriated money and had demonstrated a willingness to lie--would not "always and in every context" be religious in nature. Thus, even though the statements related to plaintiff's conduct as a pastor of the church, that fact does not render those statements absolutely privileged as a matter of law under the Free Exercise Clause. Rather, that fact gives rise to a qualified privilege.

Building Permit Charges Against Amish Farmer Dismissed on Free Exercise Grounds

In Jackson County, Wisconsin, a state trial court judge earlier this month dismissed on free exercise grounds charges against an Amish farmer and his wife that they failed to apply for a building permit to build a home and a second residence on their property. According to yesterday's Jackson County Chronicle, defendant Samuel F. Stolzfus refused to sign a building permit application on religious grounds because he did not know if he could adhere to the promise in it that he would comply with local ordinances and the state's uniform dwelling code. The court concluded: "The town has failed to establish a compelling governmental interest in requiring signed applications from the Amish and, therefore, may not enforce the ordinance against them." In the two-year old case, the town did not charge that there were actual safety problems with the buildings Stolzfus constructed.

UPDATE: Here it the full opinion in Town of Albion v. Stolzfus, (WI Cir. Ct., Jan. 7, 2010). [Thanks to Robert L. Greene.]

Indonesian Government Says 20% of Mosques Face Wrong Direction

Worshippers in mosques are supposed to face Mecca when the pray. According to today's Jakarta Globe, Indonesia's ministry of religion says that there are errors in the direction worshippers face in 20% of the country's mosques-- mainly in the earthquake-hit areas such as Yogyakarta, West Java and West Sumatra. The ministry suggests that mosques just have worshipers change the direction they are facing, rather than renovating the entire building.

Bill Proposed In California To Protect Clergy From Perfoming Same-Sex Marriages

As the federal court trial challenging the constitutionality of California's gay marriage ban continues (New York Times 1/27), proponents of same-sex marriage yesterday introduced a bill in the California legislature to make the prospect more appealing to opponents. The Civil Marriage Religious Freedom Act (SB 906) emphasizes the distinction between religious and civil marriage by changing language in state statutes relating to marriage to refer to "civil marriage." The bill goes on to add to the section which permits clergy to perform marriage ceremonies:

No person authorized by this subdivision shall be required to solemnize a marriage that is contrary to the tenets of his or her faith. Any refusal to solemnize a marriage under this subdivision shall not affect the tax exempt status of any entity.

According to LAist yesterday, both Equality California (press release) and the California Council of Churches back the measure.

1st Circuit Rejects Religious Persecution Claim By Chinese Woman Seeking Asylum

In Weng v. Holder, (1st Cir., Jan. 27, 2010), the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeal denying asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture to a native and citizen of China who claimed she has and in the future will likely face religious persecution. Jin Weng is an adherent of Zun Wang, a banned religion in China. An immigration judge had found Weng's testimony to be inconsistent with her earlier statements to immigration officials after she illegally entered the U.S. from Mexico. At that time, she did not mention religion but said she was fleeing China and feared returning there because of poverty and other nonreligious reasons. The judge rejected additional testimony by her at her immigration hearing regarding her religious persecution in China because he found her not to be a credible witness. Yesterday's National Examiner reports on the decision.

In West Bank, Mosques Become Part of Battle Between PA and Hamas

IPS yesterday reported that in the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority's Fatah Party is using mosques in its battle against rival Hamas, as well as against critics within its own party. Earlier this month, the PA Ministry of Religious Affairs distributed a prepared sermon that imams were ordered to read before Friday prayers. While the PA has been dictating imam's speeches for a year, the sermon earlier this month was particularly controversial. It attacked Qatar-based Sheikh Youseff El-Qaradawi, an outspoken opponent of PA President Mahmoud Abbas. When some worshippers hurled abuse at imams reading the sermons, PA security forces raided a number of mosques and arrested some of the worshippers.

Qaradawi is considered a prominent scholar of Islamic law. He condemned Abbas for thwarting U.N. action on a report critical of Israel's 2008 incursion into Gaza. The rhetoric is heated. Qaradawi called for Abbas to be stoned in Mecca if it is shown that he instigated Israel against Gaza. The controversial PA sermons delivered in response called Qaradawi an ignoramus and a puppet of the government of Qatar.

Court Applies Ministerial Exception to Dismiss Suit by Catholic School Teacher

In Weishuhn v. Catholic Diocese of Lansing, (MI Ct. App., Jan. 26, 2010), a Michigan appellate court dismissed a lawsuit brought by a Catholic school teacher who taught mathematics and religion to 6th, 7th and 8th graders. Plaintiff challenged her termination. The court concluded that plaintiff's duties were primarily religious in nature, and that the ministerial exception doctrine applies to both her Civil Rights Act claim and her Whistleblower Protection Act claim. The court said: "Termination of a ministerial employee by a religious institution is an absolutely protected action under the First Amendment, regardless of the reason for doing so." (See prior related posting.) Yesterday's Michigan Messenger reported on the decision.

Peres Addresses Bundestag On International Holocaust Remembrance Day

Today is International Holocaust Remembrance Day, as set by a 2005 United Nations Resolution. Marking the occasion, Israeli President Shimon Peres addressed the German Bundestag. (Full text of remarks.) In a wide-ranging speech, he urged that authorities bring to justice those still alive in Germany and elsewhere in Europe who participated in the genocide of the Nazi era. Reviewing the history of the Holocaust, he said:

The Nazi rabid hatred cannot be solely defined as "anti-Semitic." This is a commonly-used definition. It does not fully explain the burning, murderous, beastly drive that motivated the Nazi regime, and their obsessive resolve to annihilate the Jews. The war's objective was to conquer Europe; not to settle scores with Jewish history. And if we constituted, we the Jews, a terrible threat in the eyes of Hitler's regime, this was not a military threat, but rather a moral threat. An opposition to the desire that denied our faith that every man is born in the image of God, that we are all equal in the eyes of God, and that all men are equal.

House of Lords Today Debates Religious Hiring By Faith Schools

In Britain today the House of Lords will debate a series of amendments proposed by Baroness Turner of Camden to limit the extent to which voluntary-aided faith schools can hire teachers on the basis of religion. (Ekklesia, Accord Coalition). Under current law, these faith schools (which receive government support) can broadly discriminate in recruitment, pay and promotion on the basis of religion, and can dismiss teachers for conduct that is incompatible with the precepts of the school's religion. The amendments would require faith schools to show that discrimination on religious grounds is a "legitimate" and "proportionate" occupational requirement-- the same standard that currently applies to religious charities in Britain. The amendments would limit schools' present ability to apply religious criteria to those who teach only secular subjects and are not in leadership roles. (London Guardian op ed.) Today's debate follows a vote on Monday in which the Lords eliminated provisions in the Equality Bill that narrowed exemptions from the sexual orientation anti-discrimination provisions for religious organizations. (See prior posting.)

Focus on Family Ad Featuring Tim Tebow Will Run During Superbowl

According to yesterday's Gainesville Sun, the conservative Christian group Focus on the Family has raised over $2.5 million to run a 30-second ad during the Superbowl featuring former University of Florida quarterback Tim Tebow. The athlete is known for his Chritsian beliefs, often writing references to Bible verses in his eye black. (Photo from Huffington Post). He was the first home schooled athlete to be nominated for the Heisman Trophy. According to a press release earlier this month from Focus on the Family, Tim and his mother Pam will share a personal story centered on the theme "Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life." News accounts speculate that the ad will center on Pam Tebow's decision, after she became seriously ill, to ignore a doctor's recommendation that she have an abortion. She gave birth to Tim. The National Organization for Women has written CBS questioning why it made an exception to its policy against advocacy ads here. In response, CBS has announced it would consider other "responsibly produced" advocacy ads for the few remaining spots on the Feb. 7 Superbowl broadcast.

Father's Suit Against Family Planning Clinic Dismissed

Yesterday's Corpus Christie (TX) Caller reported that a Texas federal district court has dismissed a lawsuit against a family planning clinic brought by a father who objected to the clinic's giving his 14-year old daughter the "morning after pill." He said that this violated her religious and moral training. South Texas Family Planning in Kingsville (TX), however, contended that federal guidelines for its grant funds preclude requiring parental consent to dispense so-called "Plan B."

German Family, Persecuted for Homeschooling, Granted Asylum In U.S.

Yesterday's Washington Post reports that a couple who fled from Germany to Tennessee in order to home school their children have been granted political asylum by a U.S. immigration judge. Uwe Romeike and his wife argued that they were persecuted in Germany for their evangelical Christian beliefs and for homeschooling their children to avoid public schools whose curriculum they believed to be opposed to Christian values. German law requires children to attend public or private schools. When the Romeikes ignored orders to send their children to school, German police came to their home and took the children to school. In 2007, Germany's highest appellate court ruled that in severe cases children could be removed from their home. The asylum grant allows the Romeike's to remain in Morristown, TN, where they have lived since 2008. A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesman refused to comment on whether the government would appeal the immigration judge's decision.

Rabbis Urge AG Holder To Grant Rubashkin Pre-Sentence Release

Six prominent Orthodox rabbis held a news conference in Washington, D.C. yesterday and then walked to the Department of Justice to deliver a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder protesting the pre-sentencing detention of Sholom Rubashkin, former manager of the Postville, Iowa Agriprocessors kosher meatpacking plant. Yeshiva World News carries the full text of the letter aruging that Rubashkin, who was convicted last November of bank fraud relating to a loan to Agriprocessors and of failing to pay livestock providers in a timely manner, does not present a flight risk. After these convictions, the government dropped immigration-related charges that had been filed against for employing illegal immigrants. The letter to Holder reads in part:

Mr. Rubashkin has been an observant Orthodox Jew since birth. His dietary observances prevent him from eating food that is not certified as kosher or that is heated in a non-kosher appliance. He, therefore, has eaten only cold food while in prison....

He and his wife have ten children, six of whom live at home with their parents. They have an autistic 16-year-old son who has always been heavily dependent on his father. Mr. Rubashkin’s absence from his home at this time – when he is most needed to prepare his children in case he is sentenced to a lengthy prison term – is devastating....

Moreover, his friends and his religious community have offered to pay for a 24-hour private armed security guard that will, in effect, imprison him in his home until his sentencing. A total of approximately 8 million dollars in the equity of 43 homes has been offered as security for his appearance. And to demonstrate the intensity of their conviction that he will not flee, rabbis have offered Torah scrolls – that may not be assigned except for the most extreme and exigent needs – as security for his presence.

The Forward yesterday also reported on the rabbi's news conference.

French Parliamentary Report Urges Ban of Full Face Veil In Public Buildings and Transport

A long awaited report from a French parliamentary committee released today recommends a ban on women wearing the Muslim full-face veil in hospitals, schools, government office and on public transport. It suggested that anyone ignoring the ban in a public building should be denied the services offered in it. The report called wearing of the full face veil "a challenge to our republic," and urged Parliament to pass a resolution declaring that the veil is contrary to French republican principles of secularism. According to BBC News, the report also recommends taking into account in asylum requests coercion to wear the full veil as an indication of a wider persecution, and calls for creation of a national school of Islamic studies. The report, however, stopped short of calling for a total ban on full face veils, viewing that as difficult to enforce and as possibly making France a target for terrorism. (See prior related posting.)

9th Circuit Rejects RLUIPA Zoning Challenge In Brief Opinion

In an unpublished opinion which sets out none of the relevant facts, the 9th Circuit last Friday in Lowry v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors, (9th Cir., Jan. 22, 2010), rejected a pro se appeal in a case in which plaintiffs claimed that a zoning decision violated their free exercise rights. The court concluded that summary judgment was properly granted under RLUIPA and Arizona law because no substantial burden on the exercise of religion was shown. No 1st Amendment violation was shown because the zoning laws are neutral and generally applicable. Plaintiffs' equal protection claim failed because they did not identify others who were treated differently under the zoning ordinances.

Gnostic Center Fails Britain's "Public Benefit" Test To Be A Charity

In Britain, Third Sector today calls attention to a decision (full text) handed down last month by the Charity Commission rejecting an application by The Gnostic Center for registration as a charity. Apparently the decision, finding that the Center failed the "public benefit" test imposed by Britain's Charities Act, was reaffirmed earlier this month after a review by two of the Charity Commission's board members. (Third Sector). In the decision, the Commission found that the Center did not advance education for public benefit, concluding that : "It is not advancing education based on broad values that are uncontroversial, which would generally be supported by objective and informed opinion." The Commission also rejected the claim that the Center is advancing religion for the public benefit, holding:

To be a religion in charity law, there must also be a positive, beneficial, moral or ethical framework promoted, since a spiritually improving effect on its own is insufficient.... There was no evidence of shared morals or ethics amongst followers or the promotion of these by the Gnostic Center.

Finally the Charity Commission rejected the argument that the Center promoted moral or spiritual welfare or improvement of the community for public benefit, finding no demonstrable impact of the Center's teachings and practices on society.

Bangladesh Takes Next Step To Ban Religious Political Parties

Bangladesh has taken another step toward banning religious-based political parties. Earlier this month, the country's Supreme Court reinstated a constitutional ban on such parties. (See prior posting.) Now, according to RTT News today, the Election Commission has written to three Islamic political parties directing them to amend their charters to remove various religious references.

Federal Court Applies Younger Abstention In Challenge To Maine's Charitable Solicitations Act

In Christian Action Network v. State of Maine, (D ME, Jan. 13, 2010), a Maine federal district court applied the Younger v. Harris abstention doctrine and dismissed a challenge by Christian Action Network (CAN) to Maine's Charitable Solicitations Act. CAN claimed that the law imposes an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech, is overbroad, and that the state had discriminated against it on the basis of its viewpoint in refusing to renew its charitable solicitation license. The refusal was based on alleged unlicensed solicitation of donations in Maine in April 2009 and CAN's unauthorized use of the Governor's name in a mailing that suggested the Governor endorsed the anti-Muslim message in the group's newsletter. The court's decision requires CAN to assert its constitutional challenges in state enforcement proceedings that had been commenced before the federal lawsuit was filed. (See prior related posting.) WorldNet Daily today carries an article critical of the decision.

House of Lords Votes To Keep Broader Discrimination Exemptions For Religious Organizations

In Britain yesterday, the House of Lords defeated a a government attempt in the pending Equality Bill to narrow the employment discrimination exemptions currently available to religious institutions under the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003. Under that law, religious organizations can discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation in order to comply with religious doctrine or to avoid conflicting with the strongly held religious convictions of a substantial number of the religion's followers. (Sec. 7(3).) The Equality Bill, which consolidates a number of Britain's anti-discrimination laws, would have limited the exemption to individuals whose "employment mainly involves" either "leading or assisting in the observance of liturgical or ritualistic practices of the religion," or "promoting or explaining the doctrine of the religion (whether to followers of the religion or to others)." (See prior posting.)

In the House of Lords, Bishop Scott-Joynt and Baroness O'Cathain, an evangelical, proposed amendments to retain the 2003 exemptions. (Christian Today). According to Christian Institute, in three separate votes yesterday (216- 178, 195-174 and 177-172), the peers voted to approve Lady O'Cathain's amendments.

Malaysian Court Overturns Book Ban on Academic Essays on Muslim Women

In Malaysia, the Kuala Lumpur High Court today overturned a ban imposed by the Home Ministry in 2008 on the book Muslim Women and the Challenge of Islamic Extremism. According to The Edge, the book, which contains ten academic essays by activists and intellectuals, was published by a Muslim feminist NGO. In its opinion, the court rejected the Home Ministry's claim that the book would disturb public order and confuse Muslim women and those with a shallow knowledge of Islam. The court said: "Some may not agree with what is stated in the book but this is to be expected in an academic text, which this book is. But to conclude that it can create public disorder is something that cannot stand to objective scrutiny."

Christians In Nigerian City Charge Military With Genocide

In Nigeria, the Army's attempt to end Muslim-Christian violence in the the northern city of Jos (see prior posting) has led to charges of genocide by the Plateau State Christian Elders Consultative Forum. According to today's Nigeria Guardian, Christian leader charge that Maj-Gen. Saleh Maina has sent out military patrols made up only of Muslims who have then killed Christians. The military denied that only Muslim soldiers were being deployed. An editorial in today's Guardian gives more background, reporting that more than 4000 have been killed in sectarian violence in the city since 2001.

Ban on Burqa Debated In France, Britain

In France, a Parliamentary commission is scheduled to publish its recommendations tomorrow on whether the Muslim women should be banned from wearing the full-face veil in public places. According to Islam Online yesterday, France's Conference of French Imams supports a ban, saying that a majority of Muslim scholars agree that women are not required to cover their full face. They say that the issue is being used to "tarnish" the image of Muslims in France and elsewhere in the West. However other Muslim leaders in France oppose any ban. The leader of the French Council for the Muslim Religion says that a ban would infringe Muslim's religious freedom. The president of the French Union of Islamic Organizations says he believes that a ban would encourage Islamophobia, though he supports requiring women to identify themselves in public transportation when necessary for security purposes.

Meanwhile, in yesterday's London Times, Dominic Lawson published a powerful op-ed opposing suggestions by the UK Independence Party that the burqa be banned in Britain. He writes that the view of Muslims being portrayed by those who support a ban is reminiscent of these lines from Adolph Hitler in Mein Kampf: "As I was once strolling through the inner city, I suddenly happened upon an apparition in a long caftan with black hair locks. Is this a Jew? was my first thought ... but the longer I stared ... the more my first question was transformed into a new conception: is this a German?"

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Lance McMillian, Atticus Finch as Racial Accommodator: Answering Malcolm Gladwell's Critique, (January 16, 2010).

Other articles:

• Richard F. Duncan, The "Clearest Command" of the Establishment Clause: Denominational Preferences, Religious Liberty, and Public Scholarships that Classify Religions, (South Dakota Law Review, forthcoming).

Recent Books:

• Michael Pasquier, Fathers on the Frontier: French Missionaries and the Roman Catholic Priesthood in the United States, 1789-1870, (Oxford Univ. Press, Dec. 2009).
• Tariq Ramadan, What I Believe, (Oxford Univ. Press, Sept. 2009).
• Beate Meyer, Hermann Simon & Chana Schutz (eds.), Jews in Nazi Berlin: From Kristallnacht to Liberation, (Univ. of Chicago Press, Dec. 2009).

Italian Judge Removed In Dispute Over Crucifixes In Courtrooms

In Italy, The Superior Council of Magistrates has removed Judge Luigi Tosti from the professional rolls of Italian magistrates. AP reported on Friday on the action that essentially removes Tosti from office. Tosti has refused to hear cases because there are crucifixes in Italian courtrooms. He has argued that defendants are entitled to be tried in secular courtrooms. The Council took similar action in 2006, but apparently reversed itself after Italy's Supreme Court of Cassation rejected Tosti's conviction for refusing to carry out official duties.(See prior posting.) The Council's most recent action came after Tosti refused to hear cases in a courtroom where the crucifix had been removed to meet his objections. Apparently he is insisting they be removed from all courtrooms.

Appellate Court Allows Church Parking Lot Over Historical Preservation Objections

In Friends of The Bethany Place, Inc. v. City of Topeka, (KS Ct. App., Jan. 22, 2010), the Kansas Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, upheld the decision of the Topeka City Council to allow Grace Episcopal Cathedral to build a parking lot on a tract in downtown Topeka that is listed on the Register of Historic Kansas Places. The State Historical Preservation Officer opposed the project and the district court ruled against the project. (See prior posting.) However the Court of Appeals reversed, finding that the district court improperly "went beyond the record and reweighed the evidence before the Council in finding what it considered to be feasible and prudent alternatives to the Church's proposed project." Judge Greene dissented, saying that he "would affirm the district court's decision setting aside the Council's action as arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable."

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Merrell v. Lawler, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3218 (MD PA, Jan. 15, 2010), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed an inmate's free exercise claim, but with leave to amend. Plaintiff alleged that because of a back injury, he was unable to climb steps to get to the fourth tier where the chapel was located. However he failed to name defendants that were responsible for obstructing his ability to use the chapel.

In Edwards v. Bruno, 2009 Conn. Super. LEXIS 3305 (CT Super., Nov. 9, 2010), a Connecticut trial court rejected claims of a Jewish prisoner that he was not given a reasonable opportunity to pursue his faith at Passover. He was given 7 pounds of matzoh, seder food prepared by an ordained rabbi, and a one-on-one seder conducted by the Protestant chaplain (who was also a Messianic rabbi).

In Rubio v. Diaz, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3776 (WD TX, Jan. 15, 2010), a Texas federal magistrate judge dismissed free exercise and RLUIPA claims by an inmate who complained that his writing material, including his Bible and his Bible study correspondence, were confiscated pursuant to a subpoena generated by an investigation by the Texas Rangers. He claimed his personal Bible had the names and addresses of his family members in it, and he needed it to communicate with them. He says it also had sentimental value to him.

In Canada v. Ray, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4115 (WD VA. Jan. 19, 2010), a Virginia federal magistrate judge recommended that a Muslim inmate be permitted to move forward with his claim that his free exercise rights and his rights under RLUIPA were violated when he was required to either face discipline or take a tuberculosis skin test which he claimed contained alcohol or pork products, both forbidden by Muslim law.

In Reynolds v. Newcomer, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123469 (WD LA, Dec. 21, 2009), and in Carr v. Newcomer, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123559 (WD LA, Dec. 21, 2009), a Louisiana federal magistrate judge concluded that inmates' religious exercise was not substantially burdened, and recommended that the claims in two similar cases be dismissed as frivolous. Plaintiff claimed they have been denied the right to receive religious material such as Bibles, books, and magazines; and that the warden allows Pentecostalists and other Christian "sects" to proselytize inmates in the dormitory's common day room. One of the plaintiffs also claimed that shortly after his arrival at the prison, his religious pendant -- a gift from his grandfather -- was confiscated and that he was denied a Bible shipped to him because it was improperly packaged.

In Windham v. Pierce, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4518 (SD TX, Jan. 21, 2010), a Native American inmate challenged the requirement he take a test before being transferred to a Native American designated prison. When he was transferred without taking the test, he objected that there is no volunteer to lead services and the circle is inactive. His first claim was dismissed as moot, and his second was dismissed without prejudice because it should be brought in a different venue.

In Jihad v. Fabian, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4749 (D MN, Jan. 21, 2010), a federal district court approved a magistrate's recommendations (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123652, Dec. 23, 2009) and refused to grant a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction in response to plaintiff's complaints regarding impediments to his practice of Islam. Plaintiff, claiming a violation of his free exercise rights and of RLUIPA, alleged that authorities failed to provide a Muslim chaplain and enough Islamic services; prohibited religious meetings without a volunteer present; failed to provide Halal meals and a location where he can perform five daily salat (prayers); and prohibited him from wearing a Kufi (prayer cap) or an Islamic medallion outside of his clothing.

Mother Who Starved Children, Relying on God, Convicted of Endangerment

The Newark (NJ) Star-Ledger reports that a Sussex County (NJ) jury on Thursday convicted 50-year old Estelle Walker of child endangerment. Police found Walker's four malnourished children in a lakeside cabin in 2006. Walker's lawyer claimed that Walker was not responsible because she acted out a a delusional religious belief that God will provide. She did not eat either, and merely prayed with her children. Walker faces up to ten years in prison on each of four counts of second-degree endangerment. Earlier she had rejected a plea bargain that would have allowed her to go free with the one year time already served while she had not been able to post bail. She said she had been directed through prayer not to accept the arrangement. During Walker's trial, a psychiatrist testified that she is religious to an extreme degree, but not mentally ill.

Philippines Makes Eid'l Adha a National Holiday

The Manila (Philippines) Bulletin on Friday reported on the signing last month by President Maria Gloria Arroyo of a new law that makes the Muslim holiday of Eid'l Adha (Feast of the Sacrifice) a national holiday in the Philippines. Under a law that Arroyo signed in 2002, Eid'l Fitr is already a national holiday. The Office of Muslim Affairs has been given the authority to determine the dates of the two Muslim festivals which come at different times each year on the secular calendar. At a recent Muslim Inter-Organizational Meeting, participants also debated a bill that had been introduced into the Philippine Parliament to prohibit the pejorative use of "Muslim" and "Christian" to identify those charged with crimes. Only 5% to 10% of the Philippine population are Muslim. (Wikipedia).

Tribal Government Funds Rebuilding of Catholic Church On Reservation

The Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 imposes most of the restrictions found in the Constitution's Bill of Rights and in the 14th Amendment on Tribal governments. However, it does not impose Establishment Clause limitations on tribes. This has permitted the tribal government of California's Rincon Indian Band to pay $3.2 million in tribal funds derived from Harrah's Rincon Casino to rebuild an expanded Catholic Church on the Rincon reservation. Today's San Diego Union Tribune reports that the prior Chapel, built in the 1930's, was one of 65 buildings on the reservation destroyed by fire in 2007. Approximately 80% of the Rincon tribe members are Catholic.

Pope Keeps Cardinal Bertone On As Secretary of State

Zenit reported this week that Pope Benedict XVI will keep Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone as the Vatican's Secretary of State even though the Cardinal has reached age 75 which makes him eligible for retirement. A letter from the Pope announcing his decision said that Bertone had played a particularly valuable role in building a dialogue with Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre who is the founder of the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X.

California Proposes Halal and Expanded Vegetarian Diets For Prisons

On Jan. 16, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation issued a Notice of Proposed Regulations that would add a halal meat alternative program as a third religious dietary option for inmates at all adult institutions in the state. Participation in the program will be open to Muslim inmates and other inmates with a religious need to consume halal meat, as determined by a Muslim Chaplain. The proposed regulations would also amend existing regulations for vegetarian diets to make it clear that it is available to inmates who seek it for a personal or ethical reasons, as well as those who request it for religious reasons. The Notice says that the purpose of the proposed regulations "is to avoid future costly litigation and unnecessary expenses to the taxpayers of the State of California." Links to all the formal notices, text and forms involved are available from the CDCR website. Yesterday's Fresno Bee reported on the proposed regulations.

Passenger's Tefillin Leads To Security Scare and Emergency Landing

A U.S. Airways Express plane with 15 passengers aboard en route from New York's LaGuardia Airport to Louisville yesterday made an emergency landing in Philadelphia after a flight attendant became concerned when a 17-year old Jewish youth put on tefillin for his morning prayers. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, neither the flight attendant nor the pilot had ever seen tefillin-- small leather boxes containing scriptural verses connected to leather straps and placed on the arm and head. The pilot reported that a passenger had a device with "wires" on the plane. In a statement, the airline said the crew "did not receive a clear response" when they asked the passenger about the tefillin. Law enforcement vehicles surrounded the plane when it touched down and it was taken to a remote area where the boy, and his sister who was travelling with him were removed. Apparently with 20 minutes or so, police decided the pair, shaken by the experience, posed no threat. A TSA statement referred to the unscheduled landing as a "disruptive passenger" incident.

Group Urges Action To Appoint International Religious Freedom Ambassador

CNSNews reported yesterday that the Christian Advocacy group, Open Doors USA, has begun a petition drive to urge President Obama to fill the vacant position of Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom. Open Doors spokesperson Lindsay Vessey said that an appointment is needed to demonstrate the importance of international religious freedom. The position was created by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (IRFA). Washington Post's On Faith reported that rumors circulating in the capital suggest that the White House is considering prominent New York City pastor, Rev. Suzan Johnson Cook, for the position. Meanwhile, international religious freedom advocates are also concerned that the Ambassador-at-Large position does not carry enough clout to affect foreign policy.

Also yesterday, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom released a letter it sent earlier this month to President Obama urging him to designate Vietnam a "Country of Particular Concern" under the IRFA. It also asked him to press Congress to pass the proposed Vietnam Human Rights Act (S. 1159/ H.R. 1969). USCIRF had already recommended adding Vietnam to the list in its 2009 Annual Report issued last May. (See prior posting.)

Bible References On Rifle Sights Will End

Trijicon, Inc. issued a statement yesterday voluntarily agreeing to stop its previously reported practice of including coded references to Bible verses as part of the serial number on rifle sights supplied to the military. The New York Times reports that the company will also supply the Pentagon with 100 free modification kits that will allow the military to remove the serial numbers from rifles of units deployed in combat. Foreign military units will also be offered the kits. Trend reports that Australia and New Zealand have both announced that they will remove the inscriptions from rifle sights issued to their military. Meanwhile, blogger Christian Fighter Pilot suggested this week that there was in fact a close tie-in between the Biblical verses chosen by Trijicon and the rifle sights. The sights use fiber optic and light enhancement technology, and all of the Bible verses chosen (Old and New Testament) include "light" as a theme.

Alaska Appellate Court Says Religious Belief in Marijuana Was Not Sincere

In Lineker v. State, (AK Ct. App., Jan 20, 2010), the Alaska Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision upheld a trial court's finding that defendants had not established that their possession of marijuana was supported by a sincere religious belief. Judge Mannheimer dissenting argued that the trial court's findings in places seemed to assess the sincerity of defendants' beliefs by examining whether they were unorthodox. (See prior related posting.)

Court Holds Church Can Tear Down Historic Rectory

In Stamford, Connecticut, a state trial court judge on Wednesday refused to enjoin St. Andrew's Episcopal Church from tearing down its its 136-year old rectory building. The Stamford Advocate reports that in a 26-page opinion the court rejected the challenge brought under a rarely used state law that allows any citizen to sue to prevent the "unreasonable" destruction of historic buildings. In denying the temporary injunction. the court concluded that there is no feasible or affordable alternative to the church's arrangement with a real estate developer.

Suit Challenges Regulation of Spiritual Counsellors As Fortune Tellers

Yesterday's Richmond (VA) Times-Dispatch reports on a lawsuit filed in federal district court in Virginia challenging the constitutionality of a Chesterfield County (VA) law that regulates "spiritual counsellors" in the same way that fortune tellers are regulated. This includes a requirement to obtain a permit after a background check and character references, as well as zoning restrictions and a $300 license tax. Spiritual adviser Sophie King says she is engaged in a religious activity. She says she is not a fortune teller because she merely relays information she receives without knowing how it relates to her individual client. The county, in a motion to dismiss filed this week, says that King is engaged in a business that may be regulated. The motion to dismiss also argues that the federal court lacks jurisdiction over challenges to the county's business license tax or zoning ordinance.

Diocese Challenges Designation of Church As Historic District

Yesterday's Springfield (MA) Republican reported that the Roman Catholic Diocese of Springfield has filed suit in state court seeking to enjoin enforcement of a city ordinance enacted last December that creates an historic district out of Our Lady of Hope Church. The suit, filed against the city, the mayor and the council members in office when the district was created, also seeks unspecified damages. Historic district designation means that the building may not be torn down, and no changes can be made to its exterior, without approval of the city's Historical Commission. The complaint alleges that by limiting its ability to control church buildings, including religious symbols on them, the ordinance infringes the Diocese's constitutionally protected free exercise rights and freedom of expression, as well as violating equal protection guarantees, under both the state and federal constitutions.

Egypt's High Administrative Court Overturns Ban On Niqab In University Exams

World Bulletin reports that on Wednesday, Egypt's High Administrative Court overturned a ban imposed by the Minister of Higher Education on female students wearing the full-face niqab in university examinations. The court said:

Freedom to wear the niqab is guaranteed by human rights and constitutional liberties, and a girl's right to dress the way she sees fit in accordance with her beliefs and her social environment is a firm right that cannot be violated.

The court added, however, that a student must show her face when asked to do so for security reasons. The decision reverses one handed down by a Cairo court earlier this month. (See prior posting.)

Supreme Court Decision Impacts Those Seeking Asylum Because of Religious Persecution

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday handed down an immigration law opinion that has important implications in cases in which an individual about to be deported or removed seeks to reopen proceedings to claim asylum because of religious persecution in his country of origin. A federal regulation makes discretionary a decision to reopen proceedings to consider changed conditions relating (among other things) to religious persecution in his country of origin. In Kucana v. Holder, (Sup. Ct., Jan. 20, 2010), the Court, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg, held that a statutory bar to judicial review of decisions by the Attorney General that are made discretionary by statute does not apply to decisions by the Attorney General made discretionary only by federal regulations. In this case, an Albanian citizen sought political asylum, fearing political persecution. His motion to reopen his removal proceedings was based on claims that conditions in Albania had worsened. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion. ScotusBlog reports on the decision.

Court Rejects Claim of Religious Exemption From Income Taxes

In Bennett-Bey v. Shulman, (D DC, Jan. 20, 2010), the federal district court for the District of Columbia dismissed a pro se complaint in which plaintiff claimed a free exercise exemption from having federal income taxes withheld from her salary. Tanya Bennett-Bey alleged that she had sovereign immunity from federal taxes because she is a beneficiary of the Great Moorish Estate Express Trust, which makes her "a Moorish American Citizen." The court first found that it lacked jurisdiction because plaintiff had never filed for a refund from the IRS. Beyond that, plaintiff failed to allege that paying federal income tax would place a substantial burden on her free exercise of religion.

Rifqa Bary Remains In Foster Care, Agrees to Counseling

The Columbus Dispatch reported yesterday that a sort of detente has been reached in the case of Rifqa Bary, the 17-year old who fled her home in Ohio after converting from Islam to Christianity. She fled to a pastor in Florida, claiming her father had threatened to kill her because of the conversion. Florida courts eventually returned her to Ohio. At a court hearing in Columbus (OH) on Tuesday, both sides agreed that Rifqa would remain in a foster home where she is now living in temporary custody of Franklin County (OH) Children Services. Rifqa and her parents will go through counseling. If they are not reconciled, when Rifqa turns 18 in August when will be considered an adult and will be free to live wherever she wishes. Also in the court hearing, Rifqa admitted she was unruly in running a way from home, but the court will impose no sanctions on her. During the hearing, Rifqa, carrying a wooden cross and wearing a rhinestone crucifix necklace, clung to her attorney, Angela Lloyd. (See prior related posting.)

Japan's Supreme Court Says City's Gift of Site For Shrine Is Unconstitutional

Japan's Supreme Court yesterday ruled that the city of Sunagawa violated the Japanese Constitution when it allowed city-owned land to be used without charge as a site for a Shinto shrine. Article 20 of the Constitution bans religious organizations from receiving any privileges from the State and bars the government from engaging in religious activity. According to today's Japan Times , the Supreme Court's Grand Bench wrote: "It is inevitable that the general public would believe the local government supports a specific religion if it provides specific benefits to it." The Court remanded the case to the Sapporo High Court for it to fashion a remedy other than removal of the shrine.