Religion Clause

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Australian Group Recommends Law Reform On Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision

In the Australian state of Tasmania, the Tasmania Law Reform Institute has recently released a 101-page report on Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision. The report was prepared in response to a request from Tasmania's former Commissioner for Children (who opposed performing non-therapeutic procedures on minors) for clarification of the law on circumcision of male children and recommendations for law reform. The Institute has come forward with 14 recommendations including:

A general ban on circumcision of incapable minors, but with exceptions for "well-established religious or ethnicity motivated circumcision."
A requirement of joint parental authorization for a minor to be circumcised, with judicial determination in cases of parental disagreement.
Minimum standards and required disclosures for circumcisers.
Enactment of a new Circumcision Act that allows suits by individuals harmed by circumcision to be brought after a person reaches the age of majority.

ABC News reports on developments.

Obama, Romney Interviewed On Religious Faith In America

Washington D.C.'s National Cathedral yesterday released the August issue of its magazine Cathedral Age which contains an interview with President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney on religious faith in America. The full interviews may be downloaded after registering at the Cathedral's website. Among the more interesting exchanges was the following:

Some people have questioned the sincerity of your faith and your Christianity. How do you respond to those questions?

President Obama: I spoke about this a bit at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. You know, there’s not much I can do about it. I have a job to do as president, and that does not involve convincing folks that my faith in Jesus is legitimate and real. I do my best to live out my faith, and to stay in the Word, and to make my life look more like His. I’m not perfect. What I can do is just keep on following Him, and serve others—trying to make folks’ lives a little better using this humbling position that I hold.

Governor Romney: I am often asked about my faith and my beliefs about Jesus Christ. I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind. Every religion has its own unique doctrines and history. These should not be bases for criticism but rather a test of our tolerance. Religious tolerance would be a shallow principle indeed if it were reserved only for faiths with which we agree.

In response to another question, Gov. Romney said: "In recent years, the notion of the separation of church and state has been taken by some well beyond its original meaning. They seek to remove from the public domain any acknowledgment of God. Religion is seen as merely a private affair with no place in public life. The Founders proscribed the establishment of a state religion, but they did not countenance the elimination of religion from the public square...."

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

NYPD Testimony Says Spying On Muslims Generated No Terrorism Leads

AP reports that a deposition of a New York assistant police chief unsealed yesterday reveals that the surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods carried out for over 6 years by the NYPD's secret Demographics Unit (now known as the Zone Assessment Unit) has never generated a lead or triggered a terrorism investigation. According to AP:

The Demographics Unit is at the heart of a police spying program, built with help from the CIA, which assembled databases on where Muslims lived, shopped, worked and prayed. Police infiltrated Muslim student groups, put informants in mosques, monitored sermons and catalogued every Muslim in New York who adopted new, Americanized surnames.

The deposition was given last June in litigation raising the question of whether the New York Police Department's current surveillance program violates a long-standing consent decree that led to the so-called Handschu Guidelines for investigations involving political activity. Those Guidelines were last modified in 2003. (Background). (See prior related posting.)

Scattering of Bacon Before Muslim Ceremony Being Investigated As Hate Crime

SI Live reported yesterday that police in Staten Island, New York are investigating as a hate crime the scattering of pieces of bacon at a park Sunday prior to 1,500 Muslims attending a ceremony there to mark the end of Ramadan. A number of elected Staten Island officials spoke out against the bias displayed by the incident.

No Vatican Respondeat Superior Liability For Abusive Priest

The Oregonian and AP report that an Oregon federal district court yesterday, in a ruling from the bench, dismissed respondeat superior claims against the Vatican in a sexual abuse case brought against a priest who allegedly was moved to Portland despite knowledge of a history of sexual abuse. In Doe v. Holy See, which was on remand from the 9th Circuit (see prior posting), district judge Michael Mosman concluded that plaintiff had not shown that there was an "employment relationship" between now-deceased priest, Rev. Andrew Ronan and the Vatican. An employment relationship is a necessary prerequisite to respondeat superior liability. The abuse victim's suit however continues against Ronan's religious order, and his attorneys say they will appeal yesterday's ruling regarding the Vatican.

Conservative Christian Scholar Says Seminaries Discriminated Against Him Because of His Beliefs

Religion News Service reported yesterday on an EEOC complaint that was filed last month by Rev. Jamal-Dominique Hopkins, an African-American expert on the Dead Sea Scrolls, who says that he was fired by an Atlanta consortium of Black seminaries because of his conservative Christian views. Hopkins charges that Interdenominational Theological Center administrators intimidated him, gave him poor evaluations and changed student grades he had assigned before they ultimately refused to renew his contract. Hopkins says his problems began after he organized a meeting of the InterVarsity Christian Fellowship where attendees were offered a book that declared homosexuality a sin. ITC's president has said that the Center's actions had nothing to do with academic freedom.

White House Greetings Issued For Eid al-Fitr

Eid al-Fitr, marking the end of Ramadan, was celebrated by Muslims this past Sunday. Last Saturday President Obama issued a statement (full text) extending warm wishes from himself and Michelle to Muslim communities in the U.S. and around the world as they celebrated the Eid. He said in part: "In the United States, Eid-al-Fitr speaks to the truth that communities of faith -- including Muslim Americans -- enrich our national life, strengthen our democracy and uphold our freedoms, including the freedom of religion."

Lack of Court and NY AG's Approval Invalidates Church's Property Transfer

In Lord-N-Fields Voice of Freedom Bible Church Community Workers Intl., Inc. v Kwan, (Sup. Ct. Suffolk County NY, Aug. 2, 2012), a New York state trial court voided the transfer of a 5.5 acre parcel of land that plaintiff church had made to a private corporation ostensibly to facilitate financing for a senior citizens' housing project the church wished to construct on the land. The suit alleged that the corporation then transferred the land to its majority stockholder who, along with two associates, proceeded to mortgage the properties and take the proceeds for their own benefit. The court held that because the initial transfer of the property from the church was not approved by the court with the consent of the attorney general as required by NY Religious Corporation Law Sec. 12(1), that transfer was void. So then were subsequent transfers and mortgages stemming from it.

Monday, August 20, 2012

Pakistan's President Calls For Report On Arrest of Illiterate Christian Girl For Blasphemy

BBC News, CNN and AFP report that in Pakistan last Thursday, police reluctantly arrested a Christian girl for desecrating pages of the Qur'an and took her parents into protective custody after 150 demonstrators demanded action and threatened to burn down Christian homes. More than 600 people temporarily fled the Christian neighborhood in the Mehrabad slum near Islamabad in response to the mob threats. The girl, identified as Rimsha, was remanded into 14-days custody. Police say the girl is in her teens, but a spokesman for the All Pakistan Minorities Alliance says she is 11 to 12 years old and has Down's syndrome. Pakistan's Minister for National Harmony said that the girl probably did not purposefully desecrate the holy book. Police say the girl, who is illiterate and has never attended school, was gathering paper as fuel for cooking and unknown to her some of the papers she burned were pages of the Qur'an. Pakistan's blasphemy laws provide up to life in prison for desecrating the Qur'an. Pakistan's president Asif Ali Zardari called for the interior ministry to submit an urgent report on the incident, and said that vulnerable parts of society must be protected from misuse of the blasphemy laws. A presidential spokesman said that no one will be allowed to misuse blasphemy laws to settle personal scores.

At Muslim Ceremony, Illinois Governor Signs Bill Giving College Students Religious Attendance Accommodation

Yesterday, at a ceremony marking the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signed SB 2949, the University Religious Observances Act. The Chicago Tribune reports that Quinn participated with Muslim worshipers in the Salaat al-Eid ceremony held in suburban Chicago's Toyota Field. Some 15,000 people attended the event that was organized by a local mosque. Quinn also used the occasion to decry recent attacks against Muslims in Illinois. The law signed by Quinn provides that public and secular private colleges must give a student an excused absence and an opportunity to make up missed work or exams if the student was unable to attend class, take an exam or complete a work requirement on a particular day because of the student's religious beliefs. The student, however, must give the affected faculty member advance notice of the absence, and the college need not provide for making up the exam, study or work assignment if it would create an unreasonable burden for the institution.

Pool Reporters Accompany Romney To Church For First Time

Yesterday for the first time a small group of pool reporters were permitted to accompany presumptive Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney to church services at a Mormon church in Wolfboro, New Hampshire. Mormon churches, such as the one Romney attended yesterday, are open to non-Mormon visitors; however attendance at any of the 100 Mormon temples around the world is restricted to baptized Mormons who are qualified and prepared. The New York Times reporting on yesterday's service said that Romney's campaign strategists have decided that his religious devotion and his church leadership will appeal to voters. Another account of the Romney's in church yesterday comes from Buzzfeed's pool reporter who is herself a Mormon.

New Air Force Document Promotes Free Exercise and Government Religious Neutrality

Earlier this month, the U.S. Air Force released a new Directive on "Air Force Culture," Air Force Policy Directive 1, (Aug. 7, 2012). This brief Policy Directive was implemented by a much longer document, Air Force Instruction 1-1, (Aug. 7, 2012). God and Country blog describes the new documents as a "parting gift to the Air Force" from newly-retired General Norton Schwartz. The documents consolidate and revise a number of other regulations, but add new content as well. The Instruction has several sections that relate to the Air Force's attitude toward religion and religious beliefs of Air Force personnel:

1.7.4.1. Chaplain. The Chaplain Corps provides spiritual care and the opportunity for Air Force members and their families to exercise their constitutional right to the free exercise of religion. This is accomplished through religious observances, pastoral care, and confidential counseling, and advising leadership on spiritual, ethical, moral, morale, core values, and religious accommodation issues....

1.7.4.4. Equal Opportunity (EO). The purpose of the EO program is to enhance unit cohesion, mission readiness, and mission accomplishment by ensuring equal treatment and employment opportunity for all members. The Air Force has a zero-tolerance policy towards unlawful discrimination of any kind, including sexual harassment.... Air Force members must not unlawfully discriminate against, harass, intimidate, or threaten another person on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, national origin, age, disability, reprisal, or genetic information.....

2.11. Government Neutrality Regarding Religion. Leaders at all levels must balance constitutional protections for an individual’s free exercise of religion or other personal beliefs and the constitutional prohibition against governmental establishment of religion. For example, they must avoid the actual or apparent use of their position to promote their personal religious beliefs to their subordinates or to extend preferential treatment for any religion. Commanders or supervisors who engage in such behavior may cause members to doubt their impartiality and objectivity. The potential result is a degradation of the unit’s morale, good order, and discipline. Airmen, especially commanders and supervisors, must ensure that in exercising their right of religious free expression, they do not degrade morale, good order, and discipline in the Air Force or degrade the trust and confidence that the public has in the United States Air Force.

2.12. Free Exercise of Religion and Religious Accommodation. Supporting the right of free exercise of religion relates directly to the Air Force core values and the ability to maintain an effective team.

2.12.1. All Airmen are able to choose to practice their particular religion, or subscribe to no religious belief at all. You should confidently practice your own beliefs while respecting others whose viewpoints differ from your own.

2.12.2. Your right to practice your religious beliefs does not excuse you from complying with directives, instructions, and lawful orders; however, you may request religious accommodation. Requests can be denied based on military necessity. Commanders and supervisors at all levels are expected to ensure that requests for religious accommodation are dealt with fairly....

3.3.1. Tattoos/Brands/Body Markings. Members may not have or obtain tattoos, brands, or other markings anywhere on the body that are: obscene; commonly associated with gangs, extremist, and/or supremacist organizations; or that advocate sexual, racial, ethnic, or religious discrimination....

(See prior related posting.)

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Civil Suit Filed Against Christian Organizations In Bid To Reverse Kidnapping After Civil Union Dissolution

As previously reported, last Tuesday a federal court jury in Burlington, Vermont, found a Beachy Amish-Mennonite pastor guilty of abetting a parental kidnapping by Lisa Miller, who had been in a Vermont civil union with another woman. Miller (who declared herself a born-again Christian) sought to avoid the court-ordered child visitation rights awarded to her former partner Janet Jenkins by fleeing, ultimately to Nicaragua, where she has obtained shelter from Christian missionaries. On the same day the conviction was announced, Janet Jenkins filed a civil suit in federal district court in Vermont seeking damages and an injunction ordering return of the kidnapped child to the United States. The suit was filed against Lisa Miller and against a number of Christian organizations and their personnel, all of whom were alleged to have been involved in some way in assisting Lisa Miller. The complaint (full text) in Jenkins v. Miller, (D VT, filed 8/14/2012), included as defendants the convicted pastor, Christian Aid Ministries, Response Unlimited Inc., Liberty University Law School, and Thomas Road Baptist Church (whose pastor is the son of the late Jerry Falwell). It alleges as to various defendants violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, kidnapping, conspiracy to violate civil rights, and a claim under 42 USC 1986 for neglecting to prevent civil rights violations by others. According to last week's Lynchburg (VA) News & Advance, Liberty University law school dean Mathew Staver says the suit is "completely outrageous, and filled with lies and misrepresentations." [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In McKinley v. Maddox, (10th Cir., Aug. 14, 2012), the 10th Circuit reversed the district court and remanded for further proceedings an inmate's complaint that he was denied the right to attend off-site church services for a month, with no services being offered at his correctional facility.

In Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107912 (D MN, Aug. 2, 2012), a Minnesota federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112495, June 20, 2012) and rejected free exercise, RLUIPA and 14th amendment claims by plaintiff who complained that while he was serving a state prison sentence he was not allowed to attend his father's funeral.

In Albaiaty v. Pocwierz, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113509 (D NE, Aug. 13, 2012), a Nebraska federal district court dismissed, with leave to amend, an inmate's complaint that prison authorities would not allow him to have an English copy of the Qur'an brought to him by his family in addition to, or in exchange for, an Arabic language version he currently has. He claimed that inmates are allowed to have several copies of the Christian Bible, but only one of the Qur'an.

In Paladino v. Newsome, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113748 (D NJ, July 31, 2012), a New Jersey federal district court rejected an inmate's claim that his free exercise rights were infringed when he was denied the opportunity to attend religious services while in administrative segregation.

In Patterson v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112686 (D WV, Aug. 10, 2012), a West Virginia federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112801, July 3, 2012) and dismissed generalized religious discrimination claims by an inmate, apparently involving access to Muslim or kosher meals coordinated with Ramadan fasting, access to a Qur'an and a Muslim spiritual leader.

In Streater v. Thaler, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113448 (ED TX, Aug. 13, 2012), a Texas federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113612, July 1, 2012) and dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies the portion of an inmate's retaliation complaint that alleged he was placed in lock down for four days without privileges, and was denied the right to attend Ramadan services.

In Carter v. Unnamed Wallens Ridge State Prison Employees, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116060 (WD VA, Aug. 16, 2012), a Virginia federal district court dismissed as moot an inmate's complaint that he had been prevented from participating in the Ramadan celebration. The court refused to continue the action so plaintiff could exhaust his administrative remedies on complaints about the quality of food during Ramadan.

In Gray v. Arpaio, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115498 (D AZ, Aug. 16, 2012), an Arizona federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint regarding denial of a religious diet.

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Madonna And Concert Organizers Sued In Russia For Offending Believers and Cultural Traditions

The Huffington Post, Interfax, and Businessweek all report yesterday and today on a 333 million ruble ($10.4 million US) lawsuit filed in a Russian court against the U.S. pop star Madonna for offending the feelings of believers and the cultural traditions of city residents during her Aug. 9 concert in St. Petersburg. Also named as defendants were the concert organizer PMI Corp. and the venue at which it was held, Peterburgsky Sports and Concert Complex. At the concert, Madonna championed equal rights for gays in protest of legislation passed earlier this year by St. Peterburg banning "propaganda of sodomy, lesbianism, bisexualism and transgenderism, and pedophilia to minors." At the concert she apparently also stomped on an Orthodox cross, asking everyone in the audience wearing pink bracelets to raise their hands. The suit was brought by members of the Trade Union of Russian Citizens and of Narodny Sobor. Plaintiffs' lawyer, Alexander Pochuyev, responding to criticism that characterized the lawsuit as medieval behavior, said that plaintiffs have used: "a civilized, modern and popular way of defending their rights - by filing a lawsuit. No one burned anyone at the stake or used the inquisition. Modern civilization requires religious tolerance and respect of other values."

EEOC Wins Settlement In Religious Accommodation Suit

The EEOC announced this week a settlement agreement in a religious discrimination lawsuit it had filed in an Indiana federal district court against Magnetics International, Inc. The EEOC alleged that Magnetics fired Daniel Bewley who was employed as a laborer rather than offering a reasonable accommodation for his religious needs. Before accepting the job, Bewley, a Christian, had told the company that he needed to attend church at least every other Sunday. Subsequently however the company insisted that he work on consecutive Sundays. Under the consent decree, Magnetics will pay $30,000 in damages, will track and respond to requests for religious accommodation for the next three years, and will post a non-discrimination policy and institute employee training on non-discrimination. [Thanks to Steven H. Sholk for the lead.]

Christian School's Zoning Challenge Dismissed On Ripeness Grounds

In Tree of Life Christian Schools v. City of Upper Arlington, (SD OH, Aug. 16, 2012), an Ohio federal district court dismissed on ripeness grounds a lawsuit by a private Christian school that unsuccessfully sought a conditional use permit to operate in a commercial office building. The suit asserted RLUIPA as well as 1st and 14th Amendment and state constitutional claims. The school had been advised by the city that rezoning, rather than a conditional use permit application, would be required, but the school never initiated the rezoning process. The court concluded that the city should have the opportunity to conduct the type of in-depth review of the impact of the use of the building that would occur in a rezoning hearing. (See prior related posting.)

New Study Surveys Regulation of Religion In Denmark

In Denmark, the University of Copenhagen's Centre for European Islamic Thought this month published a 234-page study titled Danish Regulation of Religion, State of Affairs and Qualitative Reflections. The study is part of the European Union's RELIGARE project. The new report surveys four areas: (1) religion and family in Denmark; (2) religion and the labor market in Denmark; (3) religion and public space in Denmark; and (4) state support for religions in Denmark. [Thanks to Niels Valdemar Vinding via Religionlaw for the lead.]

Friday, August 17, 2012

Russian Punk Rockers Get 2 Years For Hooliganism Motivated By Religious Hatred

In Russia today, three members of the feminist Pussy Riot punk-rock band were convicted on charges of hooliganism motivated by religious hatred and each were given a 2 year prison sentence. The charges carried a maximum sentence of 7 years, and the prosecution had asked for 3 years. The three had been arrested after they entered a nearly empty Christ the Savior Cathedral and performed an obscene "punk prayer" in protest of the Russian Orthodox Church's political support for Vladimir Putin. (See prior posting.) The trial has been widely followed around the world as a test of democracy and free expression in Russia. Describing today's Moscow court proceedings, the Washington Post said:

The judge’s recitation Friday dwelled on what sounded like an offense to the church rather than the state. She quoted at length witnesses who said they were believers deeply offended by the one-minute performance.

One witness said that the young women violated the Cathedral of Christ the Savior dress code with their short dresses and that women were expected to behave modestly in church. Another said public prayers were not permitted in the cathedral without the presence of a priest. If that wasn’t bad enough, one witness said, the performance occurred just before Lent.

UPDATE: Interfax reported (8/17) that the Russian Orthodox Church has asked the Russian authorities "to show mercy within the law towards the convicted" Pussy Riot band members. Meanwhile The Examiner (9/18) reprints an English translation of a recent Open Letter (full text in Russian) in which nearly 200 Russian lawyers and jurists argue that the band members should have been charged at most merely with the minor offense under Art. 5.26 of the Russian Code of Administrative Offenses of Insulting Religious Feelings of Citizens.

Jury Awards $1.6 Million Damages For Hotel Owner's Actions Against Jewish Group

A jury in a California state trial court this week awarded $1.2 million in compensatory damages and over $400,000 in punitive damages to members of the Friends of Israel Defense Forces for violation of the anti-discrimination provisions of California's Unruh Civil Rights Act by a hotel at which the group was holding an event. As reported by the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, plaintiffs claimed that the owner of the Santa Monica Hotel Shangri-La, Tehmina Adaya (a Pakistani-born Muslim), attempted to evict the Jewish group (repeatedly using profanity), but finally allowed them to stay if they removed all signage and literature identifying the purpose of the event. A former employee sad that Adaya feared her family would cut off financing from her if they learned there was a Jewish event at the hotel. Adaya denied the charges.

Justice Department Sues Florida Prisons Over Lack of Kosher Meals For Religious Accommodation

As reported by the Huffington Post, on Tuesday the U.S. Department of Justice filed suit in federal district court against the Florida Department of Corrections claiming that its refusal to supply kosher meals (except in a small pilot program in one facility) to those who have a religious need for them violates the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. The complaint (full text) in United States v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, (SD FL, filed 8/14/2012), alleges that Florida's "dietary policies force prisoners with a religious basis for consuming kosher meals to violate their core religious beliefs on a daily basis." Florida prisons discontinued their prior Jewish Dietary Accommodation Program in 2007.

Saudi Government Agency Files 166 Objections, Many Religion-Based, To Proposed New gTLD's

As previously reported, in June the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published a list of who has applied for which new generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) names. At least 15 of the proposed new gTLD's have religious connotations. With the deadline for general comments on the applications recently extended to September 26, already a number of objections, as well as supporting statements, have been filed for certain of the religious themed URL suffixes. Today Online reported yesterday that Saudi Arabia's Communication and Information Technology Commission has filed 166 objections. The gTLD's that the Saudi's oppose include .catholic (because other churches use the term in their names) and .islam (because the applicant cannot represent the entire Muslim community). The Saudi Commission states more generally:

... we believe that any and all gTLD applications for any name in relation to religion or a specific community should be presented to representative members of that community for evaluation and the view of such members should be taken into account when granting or denying the application. If this cannot be accomplished then these community and religious sensitive names/words should be restricted completely from being used as gTLD's altogether.

The Saudis have also filed objections to proposed gTLD's that are associated with items prohibited by Islamic law, such as .tattoo, .bar, .pub, .gay, .vodka. The Saudis also oppose .bible because "with a number of religions, and groups within them, disagreeing over the provenance and content of the bible one group or individual should not be permitted to define what the bible is, or is not, on the world wide web."

An examination of the objections which have been filed with ICANN can be searched from this website. To view all the filings by the Saudis, search by "Name" for "Abdulmjid". Searches can also be made by "String" to find comments on any of the other proposed gTLD's. For example, an individual concerned about the Church of England has objected to the Vatican's application for the .catholic gTLD. [Correction: an earlier version incorrectly attributed this objection to the Church of England itself.] [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

4th Circuit Grants En Banc Review In Pregnancy Center Compelled Speech Case

On Wednesday, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals granted en banc review in Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore. (Full text of court order.) In the case, a 3-judge panel (in a 2-1 decision) in June struck down on free speech grounds a Baltimore ordinance that requires "limited-service pregnancy centers" to post signs announcing that that they do not provide or make referrals for abortion or birth control services. (See prior posting.) The Center for Reproductive Rights issued a press release applauding the decision to rehear the case.

Disciplinary Office Seeks Suspension of Lawyer For Anti-Catholic Statements In Court Filings

As reported by the St. Paul Pioneer Press and by MinnLawyer Blog, the Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility on Wednesday filed with the Minnesota Supreme Court a petition seeking suspension from practice of attorney Rebekah Nett. The petition alleges a pattern of bad faith litigation and reckless and harassing statements. Among the statements at issue are a number of anti-Catholic slurs directed at the federal bankruptcy court judge and several federal bankruptcy trustees. This excerpt from the 26-page petition to the state Supreme Court gives a flavor of the statements involved:

Respondent's statements ... that Judge Dreher is a Catholic judge, that Judge Dreher is a black robed bigot, that the Chapter 7 trustee had engaged in lies, deceit, treachery, and connivery... , that the fact that [3 U.S. trustees and the judge] ... are of the same race and religion demonstrates their conspiracy and deceitful practices to hurt the debtor, that ... court systems... are composed of a bunch of ignoramus, bigoted Catholic beasts that carry the sword of the church ... lacked a basis in law or fact and were made with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard at to their truth or falsity.

(See prior related posting.)

German Court Refuses To Ban Demonstrators' Caricatures of Muhammad

AP reports that in Germany, a Berlin administrative court yesterday rejected an emergency appeal by three mosques that are seeking to prevent the right wing "Citizens Movement - Pro Germany" from displaying caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad at a planned demonstration this weekend. The slogan for the Berlin demonstration is "Islam does not belong in Germany - Stop Islamization." The court ruled that the caricatures are protected by free expression guaranties, and do not violate laws against slander or inciting hate or violence. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Shooter At Family Research Council Was Supporter of LGBT Rights

The Washington Post report today on the 28-year old man charged with shooting and wounding a security guard at the D.C. office of the Family Research Council suggests that he was motivated by the Council's opposition to expansion of rights for gays and lesbians. According to the FBI affidavit (full text) seeking to show probable cause to charge Floyd Lee Corkins II, the shooter told the guard, before opening fire, "I don't like your politics." Corkins' backpack contained 15 sandwiches from Chick-fil-A, whose president recently made highly publicized statements in opposition to same-sex marriage. Corkins' parents told investigators that Corkins has strong opinions about those he believes do not treat homosexuals in a fair manner. Corkins has been volunteering at a community center that serves LGBT clients.

1st Circuit Upholds Monastery's Copyright Infringement Claims As To Translations Of Religious Works

In Society of the Holy Transfiguration Monastery, Inc. v. Archbishop Gregory of Denver, Colorado, (1st Cir., Aug. 2, 2012), the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a Massachusetts district court's copyright infringement judgment in favor of an Eastern Orthodox monastic order. (See prior posting.) Holy Transfiguration Monastery translated a number of ancient religious texts. Archbishop Gregory, a former member of the Monastery, left it and formed his own monastery, the Dormition Skete, in Colorado. The Archbishop also created a website on which he posted 7 of the translations that had been produced b y Holy Transfiguration Monastery. An earlier lawsuit over the postings ended with a settlement agreement. However documents remained on the Archbishop's website, and the present suit-- for breach of contract and copyright infringement followed. The Second Circuit rejected a number of defenses raised by the Archbishop-- including contentions Monastery's Works were made for hire for the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (ROCOR); that they are in the public domain; that the materials are not copyrightable; a fair use defense and a claim that the dispute was a matter of religious law outside the jurisdiction of civil courts.

Particularly at issue was a provision in the Monastic Statutes for Monasteries of ROCOR calling for transfer of monastery property to ROCOR in case of closing or liquidation of a monastery. The Archbishop claimed that this provision was triggered by the Monastery's ending of its affiliation with ROCOR. The 1st Circuit said:

A review of the record confirms that we may apply the Monastic Statutes' plain terms without treading upon religious doctrine, church governance, and ecclesiastical laws.... Neutrally applying this plain language, we conclude that the Archbishop's position as to ROCOR's ownership holds little water.

Ft. Hood Shooter's Trial Stayed While Appeals Court Considers Forced Shaving of Defendant

The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces yesterday issued an order staying proceedings in the trial of mass shooter Maj. Nidal Hasan. According to a release from the Fort Hood Public Affairs Office, the stay was imposed while the appeals court decides whether or not the presiding judge in the military trial can order Hasan, who has grown a beard for religious reasons, to be forcibly shaved. (See prior posting.) Earlier yesterday, according to the Los Angeles Times, Hasan's lawyers told the trial court that Hasan wanted to plead guilty for religious reasons to take responsibility for his actions. Military judge Col. Gregory Gross said he was not allowed to accept a guilty plea in a capital case, but that Hasan's lawyers could still enter the plea.

UPDATE: Here is the full text of the Court of Appeals order. It calls for the military court trial judge to respond by Aug. 22. The full text of Hasan's petition to the appeals court, which includes Hasan's legal arguments in support of the petition, is also available online. It recites in part that "Petitioner is a practicing Muslim and has recently had a premonition that his death is imminent. He does not wish to die without a beard as he believes not having a beard is a sin." The Los Angeles Times has further coverage.

Hungary's Ombudsman Wants Court Review Of Law On Churches

BosNewsLife reported yesterday that in Hungary, the country's Ombudsman who is elected by Parliament to protect fundamental civil rights is asking the Constitutional Court to overturn the country's recently enacted Law on the Right to Freedom of Conscience and Religion, and on Churches, Religions and Religious Community. The Constitutional Court struck down an earlier version of the law last year on procedural grounds. (See prior posting.) The law recognizes only 14 religious faiths, instead of the 300 that have previously recognized, and permits others to apply to Parliament for recognition if they have been operating in Hungary for at least 20 years. Under this provision Parliament has recognized 18 additional groups. The Ombudsman contends that the provision in the law that gives Parliament the unreviewable power to decide which groups will be recognized is "contrary to the principle of separation of power, to the right to fair procedure and to the right to legal remedy." Formal recognition gives churches tax-free status and access to government support. It also authorizes them to collect contributions during services and do pastoral work in jails and hospitals.

11th Circuit Orders Hearing On Standing In 10 Commandments Case

In American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, Inc. v. Dixie County Florida, (11th Cir., Aug. 15, 2012), the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals remanded to the district court for a hearing on standing a case challenging the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments statue near the entrance to the Dixie County, Florida courthouse. The individual (identified as John Doe) through whom the ACLU claims organizational standing is a North Carolina resident who was offended when he saw the statue during a trip to the courthouse to check out certain real estate records. At issue was whether the statue was the cause of Doe's not moving ahead to purchase property in the county. Judge Edmondson dissented in part, arguing that the case should be remanded for immediate dismissal, rather than for a further hearing on standing. The Wall Street Journal reports on the decision.

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Islamists Launch Online Attacks Against 2 Tunisian Olympians

AP reported yesterday that in Tunisia, Islamic fundamentalists are using social media in a campaign against two Tunisian Olympic athletes. Islamists on social media networks are calling on the Tunisian government to strip steeplechase silver medalist Habiba Ghribi of her Tunisian citizenship because her running outfit was too revealing. Ghribi is first Tunisian woman to win an Olympic medal. Separately, the Islamist group Ansar al Chariaa is conducting a Facebook campaign against swimmer Oussama Mellouli because he drank juice before racing during Ramadan. Mellouli won a gold and a bronze medal.

State Secrets Privilege Leads To Dismissal Of Suit For Spying On Mosques

The Los Angeles Times reports that yesterday a California federal district court dismissed a class action lawsuit that had been filed against the federal government and the FBI for planting an informant in Orange County, California mosques. The court accepted the government's assertion of the state secrets privilege-- that national security would be endangered by disclosing targets in counter-terrorism investigations. The court, however, permitted claims under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act against individual FBI agents and supervisors to proceed.

UPDATE: The text of the court's opinion in Fazaga v. FBI, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116723 (SD CA, Aug. 14, 2012) is now available.

Court Can Hear Clergyman's Claim For Unpaid Salary Due

In Crymes v. Grace Hope Presbyterian Church, Inc., (KY App., Aug. 10, 2012), a Kentucky state appeals court held that the 1st Amendment does not prevent a court from hearing a suit for unpaid salary and benefits brought by a Presbyterian pastor who was fired from his position. The court said:

It is undisputed that Crymes is not contesting Grace Hope's termination of him as pastor. Rather, Crymes is merely seeking compensation for unpaid salary and benefits allegedly owed to him for work performed prior to his termination.... A claim for unpaid wages and benefits for work previously performed under an employment contract is not ecclesiastical and is reviewable by the court.

First Amendment Center reports on the decision.

Passenger Sues El Al After Orthodox Jewish Man Takes Her Seat To Avoid Sitting Next To A Woman

A Florida woman is suing Israel's El Al airlines, apparently in an Israeli court, for gender discrimination after a flight steward on her flight to Israel moved her to a less desirable seat further back in the plane. As reported by Israel Hayom, Digital Journal and Arutz Sheva, Debra Ryder boarded a flight in New York and found that her assigned seat was already occupied by an ultra-Orthodox Jewish man who had moved to it to avoid sitting beside a woman passenger who was next to him in his original seat. The man refused to move back, and a crew member asked Ryder to instead take the man's assigned seat so the flight could take off. Ryder had chosen her original seat so she could be near a rest room to facilitate her taking medications. The seat change also resulted in her not getting the vegetarian meal she had pre-ordered. Ryder is asking for NIS 50,000 ($12,500 US) in damages .

Pastor Convicted Of Aiding Parental Kidnapping By Woman Ending Her Civil Union

Yesterday, a federal court jury in Burlington, Vermont found Kenneth L. Miller, a Beachy Amish-Mennonite pastor from Virginia, guilty of abetting an international parental kidnapping. The New York Times reports on the case in which Lisa Miller (no relation to the pastor), who had been in a Vermont civil union with another woman, sought to avoid the court-ordered child visitation rights awarded to her former partner by fleeing with her daughter first to Virginia (where she declared herself a born-again Christian), then to Canada and finally to Nicaragua. Pastor Miller helped the mother arrange to fly from Canada to Nicaragua and obtain shelter from missionaries in Nicaragua. (See prior posting.)

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Pope's Butler Formally Indicted In Document Leak

Radio Vatican reported yesterday that Pope Benedict XVI's former butler, Paolo Gabriele, has been formally charged with, and will stand trial for, grand theft in the leaking of private documents about the Pope and other Curia officials to the press. The full text of the indictment in Italian is available online. Apparently Gabriele has confessed to furnishing the documents to Italian Journalist Gianluigi Nuzzi, saying that he believed the Pope was ill-informed of evil and corruption in the church. (See prior related posting.)

NYC Informed Consent Proposal To Controversial Circumcision Procedure Draws Opposition

The Forward reports today on the growing opposition in the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community to a proposed rule (full text) published last month by the New York City Health Department that would require written informed consent by parents to a controversial ritual circumcision method. The procedure, known as metzitzah b’peh, involves use of the mohel's mouth-- rather than the more commonly used sterile pipette-- to suction blood from the circumcision site. The practice can pass dangerous herpes infection to the child. The proposed regulation would require that parents sign a form to be developed by the Health Department whenever oral suction is to be used in a circumcision of a boy under one year of age. While signing of the consent form does not violate Jewish law, but ultra-Orthodox rabbinic leaders object to the health department's proposed form that describes the procedure as dangerous. A Health Department vote on the proposal is scheduled for Sept. 13. (See prior related posting.)

RLUIPA Claim For Delay In Granting Zoning Variance Can Move Ahead

In Israelite Church of God in Jesus Christ v. City of Hackensack, (D NJ, Aug. 9, 2012), a New Jersey federal district court held that plaintiff church has made out a prima facie case under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. The church alleged that the city of Hackensack delayed for 4 years its eventual approval of the church's application for a variance that the church sought so it could use a building it rented as a school to train priests. (See prior related posting.) The court also refused to dismiss claims for monetary damages under RLUIPA against two city officials in their personal and official capacities, as well as 1st Amendment claims against the two officials.

Fired Muslim Employee Sues Disney For Barring Her Hijab

The ACLU of Southern California announced yesterday that it has filed suit in a California federal district court against Walt Disney Corp. on behalf of a former employee who alleges religious harassment and refusal to accommodate her Muslim religious practice of wearing a hijab (headscarf). The complaint (full text) in Boudlal v. Walt Disney Corp., (CD CA, filed 8/13/2012), alleges claims under Title VII of the 1964 federal Civil Rights Act, California's Fair Employment and Housing Act, and common law claims for wrongful termination, negligent retention and supervision and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The suit claims that 28-year old Imane Boudlal-- who worked at Storytellers Café at Disney’s California Adventure-- was told that her hijab would violate the Disney "look" policy for employees. She offered to wear a scarf with a Disney logo to match her uniform. However management insisted that she either wear a large fedora on top of her hijab or work in a back area out of view of customers. She refused and was fired. The suit also alleges various incidents of offensive anti-Muslim and anti-Arab comments by Boudlal's co-workers.

Arizona Court Dismisses Challenge To State Day of Prayer For Lack of Standing

In Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Brewer, (AZ Super. Ct., Aug. 7, 2012), an Arizona trial court judge dismissed a constitutional challenge to Arizona Governor Jan Brewer's proclamation of an annual Arizona Day of Prayer. According to the court:

In the absence of a particularized and concrete injury suffered by Plaintiffs, their claims cannot go forward. Plaintiffs have not alleged that they filed their claims in their capacity as taxpayers, nor have they shown a direct injury, pecuniary or otherwise.

Gov. Brewer issued a statement (full text) applauding the decision which she called "little more than another sad attempt to stifle an American tradition."

Monday, August 13, 2012

Saudi Arabia Building All-Women's Industrial City To Comply With Sharia

In order to both comply with strict interpretations of Sharia law and also increase participation of women in its work force, Saudi Arabia plans to build an industrial city for female workers. Today's Los Angeles Times and International Business Times report that the city, which will be built within Hofuf, will have sections and production halls reserved for women within factories, and will be located near residential neighborhoods to facilitate women getting from home to work. The new city is expected to attract the equivalent of $133.3 million (US) in investments and create 5,000 jobs in the textiles, pharmaceuticals and food processing industries. Additional similar cities are planned.

Advocacy Group Sends US Schools Publication On Right of Religious Expression

Liberty Counsel announced last week that it is sending a copy of its publication Patriot's Handbook of Religious Freedom in Public Schools to every school in the United States. It says it is completing delivery of 99,750 copies around the country. According to the press release: "This booklet clarifies the rights of students to pray, form Bible clubs, and engage in religious expression in public schools, including holiday celebrations and the rights of teachers, parents, and guardians." According to God Discussion, Matt Staver, chairman of Liberty Counsel, says that he believes public school teachers lack information on religious freedoms.

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Nominations For ABA Journal's Top 100 Legal Blogs Now Open

The American Bar Association Journal announced last week that it is working on its annual list of the 100 best legal blogs, and invites blog readers to use the form at this link:

to tell us about a blawg—not your own—that you read regularly and think other lawyers should know about. Or if you don't have particular blawgs in mind but think blawgs from a certain practice areas should be represented in the Blawg 100, you can use this form to let us know which ones. If there is more than one blawg you want to support, feel free to send us additional amici through the form. We may include some of the best comments in our Blawg 100 coverage. But keep your remarks pithy—you have a 500-character limit. Friend-of-the-blawg briefs are due no later than Sept. 7, 2012.

The ABA has also urged us bloggers to tell readers about the opportunity to send messages on behalf of their favorite legal blogs. Religion Clause has made the top 100 list four out of the last five years. I invite any readers who think it belongs there again-- or who have a different favorite legal blog-- to participate in the ABA's selection process.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Hennis v. Tedrow, (3d Cir., Aug. 7, 2012), the 3rd Circuit upheld dismissal of an inmate's claim that his rights were violated when he was told to cut his dreadlocks (but never in fact forced to do so) and was not provided his religious vegetarian meals during a prison lock down.

In Burton v. Clark, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109106 (ED CA, Aug. 2, 2012), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing free exercise and RLUIPA claims by an inmate whose request for a special religious diet was refused. He sought a vegetarian diet free of excess beans, butter, margarine, peanut butter, and cheese, and claimed that the food needed to be blessed by a rabbi to make it kosher.

In Hull v. Cox, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109272 (D NV, July 27, 2012), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109273, June 6, 2012) and dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies an inmate's complaint that prison officials have refused to recognize his Community of Christ religion and have not scheduled a time slot for its services.

In Gibson v. Campbell, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111050 (D CO, Aug. 8, 2012), a Colorado federal district court agreed with a federal magistrate judge that an inmate's free exercise rights weer not infringed when authorities prohibited him from having an audio book player in his cell.

In Lemcool v. Poole, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111131 (ND FL, Aug. 8, 2012), a Florida federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111132, July 9, 2012), and dismissed as moot a Wiccan inmate's complaint about the inability to schedule Sabbat and Esbats and holy day worship. A change in policy now permits inmates to engage in religious exercise under staff supervision, even if an outside volunteer is unable to be present.

In Chance v. TDCJ, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111214 (ED TX, Aug. 8, 2012), a federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111230, July 9, 2012) and dismissed complaints of a Native American inmate regarding the adequacy of Native American religious ceremonies that are offered. He objected to the lack of weekly group teaching ceremonies, and complained that smudging and pipe ceremonies are held only monthly with only the chaplain smoking the pipe and only water smudging. He was also denied the right to carry a lock of his deceased parents' hair in a pouch.

In Wesley v. City of New York, (SD NY, Aug. 10, 2012), a New York federal district court rejected a Muslim inmate's claim that he should be furnished Halal food prepared in accordance with his interpretation of Halal. He objected to the food that the Department of Corrections served under its religious meal program because Halal food trays were washed together with non-Halal trays.

Consent Decree Issued On City's Display of Crosses

A consent decree (full text) has been issued in Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Town of Whiteville, Tennessee, (WD TN, Aug. 8, 2012). The decree enjoins the town and its mayor from installing decorated or undecorated stand-alone crosses on public property. (The city had placed a cross at city hall and the mayor had installed one in front of his business.) The city also agreed not to replace one arm of a cross on the city's water tower that the city had removed when FFRF complained about the display. (See prior related posting.) FFRF issued a press release announcing the consent decree.

7th Circuit: City's Litigation Position On Proselytizers' Rights Is Not An Official Policy For Sec. 1983 Liability

In Teesdale v. City of Chicago, (7th Cir., Aug. 10, 2012), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a suit brought by a group from a nearby Baptist church that sought to proselytize for several years at the annual festival of Chicago's St. Symphorosa Catholic Church. In the case, the district court ruled that plaintiffs' 1st Amendment rights were threatened by an official city policy that St. Symphorosa could exclude plaintiffs from the public streets on which the festival was held. (See prior posting.) The 7th Circuit agreed that the city's position was unsupportable, but concluded that since it was merely a legal argument taken in litigation, the city's position does not amount to an "official policy" that gives rise to liability under 42 USC Sec. 1983:

We acknowledge the great importance that our society accords to freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion, and that the plaintiffs’ legitimate rights to such freedoms are to be respected. Like any other member of the public, the plaintiffs can exercise their rights at future public festivals, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. But under the particular facts of this case, there is no evidence of an official City policy that threatens the plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights, giving rise to municipal liability and entitling the plaintiffs to a declaratory judgment. A mere legal pleading or a litigating position, with nothing more, is insufficient to constitute an official policy under Monell. Without such an official policy, these plaintiffs do not have standing to obtain the declaratory judgment.

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Opinion Filed Supporting Injunction Against Public Feeding In Parks

As previously reported, last month a Pennsylvania federal district judge, from the bench, issued a temporary injunction against enforcement of Philadelphia's new ordinance that bans public feeding of groups of more than 3 people in any city park. The ordinance is part of the city's efforts to close down an established program by Philadelphia churches to feed the homeless in city parks, and move the food program to indoor facilities. The court has now filed extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law to support the issuance of the temporary injunction. In Chosen 300 Ministries v. City of Philadelphia, (ED PA, Aug. 9, 2012), the court concluded that the churches' food-sharing program is an exercise of religion under the Pennsylvania Religious Freedom Protection Act and that the new regulation places a substantial burden on that exercise of religion. It added:

Defendants argue that because the ban "imposes no restrictions upon praying or preaching or reading the Gospel or engaging with the homeless in [Fairmount Park]," the ban does not burden plaintiffs’ free exercise.... Essentially, defendants have assumed the authority to ascribe some of plaintiffs’ religious activities more religious significance than others, irrespective of the significance that plaintiffs themselves ascribe to their own religious activities.

The court also found that the regulation is not the least restrictive means to further a compelling governmental interest. The court said:

There is some evidence that the true purpose behind the ban is to move plaintiffs' activities away from the many cultural attractions along the Parkway in an effort to hide the City’s homeless population away from tourist eyes. Defendants vehemently deny this and do not attempt to defend the ban on this ground. Nor could they, as discriminating against unpopular groups is not a legitimate government purpose, let alone a compelling one..... [D]efendants have failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the ban is the least restrictive means of furthering their objectives of ending homelessness, feeding the homeless indoors, providing social services to the homeless, increasing the dignity of the homeless, or reducing the trash burden along the Parkway.

President Hosts White House Iftar Dinner

The White House reports that last night President Obama hosted his 4th annual Iftar dinner-- the evening meal that breaks the Ramadan fast for Muslims. Among those attending the dinner, held in the State Dining Room at the White House, were members of Congress and of the diplomatic corps. In his remarks (full text), the President said in part:

... Thomas Jefferson once held a sunset dinner here with an envoy from Tunisia -- perhaps the first Iftar at the White House, more than 200 years ago. And some of you, as you arrived tonight, may have seen our special display, ... the Koran that belonged to Thomas Jefferson. And that's a reminder, along with the generations of patriotic Muslims in America, that Islam -- like so many faiths -- is part of our national story....

In his remarks, the President emphasized important accomplishments of Muslim women, a number of whom were in attendance, including Huma Abedin (top aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton).

Another Catholic Diocese Files Suit Challenging ACA Contraceptive Services Mandate

On Thursday, the Catholic Diocese of Peoria, Illinois filed a lawsuit challenging the mandate issued under the Affordable Care Act requiring health insurance policies offered by employers to cover contraceptive services. (Diocese press release). Peoria Bishop Daniel Jenky said: "I have an obligation to protect the Church’s ability to freely practice our religion.... I cannot remain silent while the right of Catholics to practice our faith is being so gravely threatened." Several other Illinois dioceses and Catholic Charities organizations have already filed a similar lawsuit. (See prior posting.) The federal government has proposed a compromise on the issue, but most Catholic organizations find it unacceptable. (See prior posting.)

Friday, August 10, 2012

New Jersey Supreme Court: "Deific Command" Jury Instruction Not Required In Case

In State v. Singleton, (NJ Sup. Ct., July 30, 2012), the New Jersey Supreme Court clarified when a modified insanity instruction to the jury must be given as to a defendant who claims he committed an illegal act because he was commanded to do so by God. In a case which generated 3 separate opinions from the 6 justices currently sitting on the court, the majority reversed the appeals court and held that the special charge (known in New Jersey as the Warlock charge) need not be given in this case. Justice LaVecchia wrote the opinion of the court (though it was joined only by Justice Wefing). As summarized by the court's syllabus:

Defendant is not entitled to a Worlock charge because the evidence does not clearly indicate that he failed to appreciate that killing Cazan was contrary to society’s morals. The Worlock variation is not available to all those who develop idiosyncratic moral compulsions from interpreting religious material.... Defendant’s personal belief system was based on his own interpretation of scripture, fortified through dreams in which he believed to receive communications from God. That does not render his belief system in his "right to kill" certain sinners the equivalent of a command from God to kill..... Defendant also has failed to demonstrate entitlement to a Worlock charge because the evidence does not clearly indicate that he was acting pursuant to a delusional command at the time of the killing. A Worlock charge is available only when a perceived divine command overcomes a defendant’s ability to be conscious of society’s law and mores disapproving of that command.

Justice Paterson, joined by Chief Justice Rabner concurred, arguing that the Court should reject past precedent which created special considerations when a defendant claimed he was acting under a deific command. They reasoned that the concept "invites a defendant to exploit a core value of our society, respect for the religious beliefs of others, for tactical advantage."

Justice Hoens, joined by Justice Albin dissented, saying that "the majority has created a test so narrow as to be essentially non-existent."

DC High Court Says Pastor Can Pursue Breach of Contract Claim

In Second Episcopal District African Methodist Episcopal Church v. Prioleau, (DC Ct. App., Aug. 9, 2012), the District of Columbia's highest appeals court held that the 1st Amendment does not prevent a minister from pursuing a claim for breach of contract against her church. At issue was the failure of the church to pay Rev. Deloris Prioleau $39,200 it owed her as salary under the contract covering her final year as the church's pastor. The court concluded that the case should be able to be resolved using neutral principles of law, but if at trial it turns out that matters of doctrinal interpretation or church governance are at issue, the court should then dismiss the case.

German Constitutional Court Says Civil Partners Must Get Same Treatment As Spouses In Tax Law

In In re the Constitutional Complaints of Mr. P, (Fed. Const. Ct. Germany, July 21, 2012), Germany's Constitutional Court held that the prior version of Germany's Gift and Inheritance Tax Act was unconstitutional under Germany's Basic Law because it treated same-sex civil partners differently than spouses in a traditional marriage. Deutsche Welle reported on the decision.

Pagan Group's Property Not Entitled To Tax Exemption

In Maetreum of Cybele, Magna Mater, Inc. v. McCoy, (S. Ct. NY Albany Co., Aug. 2, 2012), a New York state trial court concluded that property owned by the Cybeline Revival, a religious pagan faith, was not entitled to a tax exemption because the organization failed to show that the property was used primarily in furtherance of the organization's religious purposes. Instead the primary use was to provide cooperative housing for the priestesses and their guests. The religious activities that occurred on the property were merely incidental to its use as a residence. The court added that it had no reason to doubt the sincerity of the religious and spiritual beliefs of Cybeline Revival adherents. Reporting on the decision, the Watershed Post says that the Maetreum will appeal and seek protection from foreclosure that is threatened by the county in order to recoup back taxes.

Thursday, August 09, 2012

9th Circuit: Sovereign Immunity Protects U.S. In FISA Suit By Islamic Charity

In a decision handed down on Tuesday, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a claim by an Islamic Foundation for damages from alleged warrantless electronic surveillance in 2004 in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. In Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation v. Obama, (9th Cir., Aug. 7, 2012), the court held that the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity for suits under 18 USC Sec. 1810 for wrongful collection of information, even though it has done so as to suits under other portions of FISA for wrongful use and disclosure of the information. The court also held that plaintiffs had made insufficient allegations against FBI director Robert Mueller to find personal liability on his part for the surveillance. The result of the court's holding was the reversal of the trial court' award of $2.5 million in attorneys' fees, as well as its award of comparatively small amounts in statutory damages. The Recorder reports on the decision.

Official May Testify On Santa Muerte Connection To Drug Trade

In United States v. Goxcon-Chagal, (D NM, Aug. 5, 2012), a New Mexico federal district court rejected challenges to proposed testimony by a U.S. Marshall that Santa Muerte materials are tools of the trade of drug traffickers. In addition to finding that the testimony is admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence, the court found no First Amendment problem with the proposed testimony. In a 67-page opinion, the court concluded:

Almonte’s testimony about the tools of the trade of drug organizations as they relate to individuals who worship Santa Muerte would be helpful to the jury. Almonte’s proposed expert testimony is sufficiently reliable for the Court to permit him to testify before a jury. Almonte’s proposed testimony is not improper profile evidence. Neither the Establishment Clause nor the Free Exercise Clause require exclusion of this evidence. Because the risk of unfair prejudice does not substantially outweigh the probative value of Almonte’s testimony, the Court will not exclude his testimony under rule 403....

While the religion associated with Santa Muerte is the only one that is at issue, the introduction of the evidence does not seek to punish Medina-Copete for worshiping Santa Muerte, but only for having drugs in her possession. While worshipers of Santa Muerte are at a disadvantage because they may be suspected of and successfully prosecuted for drug activity more than nonworshipers of Santa Muerte, the presence of prayers and statutes is not a necessary or sufficient condition for a criminal conviction. The Court has difficulty saying that the evidence violates the non-preferential principle of the Establishment Clause if the religion is neither a necessary or sufficient reason for a criminal conviction.

Federal Court Upholds Hawaii's Ban On Same-Sex Marriage

In Jackson v. Abercrombie, (D HI, Aug. 8, 2012), an Hawaii federal district court, in a 120-page opinion, upheld as constitutional Hawaii's laws that bar same-sex marriage. The court held that rational basis review applies in the federal equal protection and due process challenges to the state constitutional and statutory provisions involved. The court explained:

The right to marry someone of the samesex, is not "objectively, deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition" and thus it is not a fundamental right..... Hawaii’s marriage laws do not treat males and females differently as a class; consequently, the laws do not discriminate on the basis of gender. The United States Supreme Court has never held that heightened scrutiny applies to classifications based on sexual orientation....

[T]he legislature could rationally conclude that defining marriage as a union between a man and woman provides an inducement for opposite-sex couples to marry, thereby decreasing the percentage of children accidently [sic.] conceived outside of a stable, long-term relationship.... The legislature could also rationally conclude that other things being equal, it is best for children to be raised by a parent of each sex.

Hawaii has enacted a law providing for civil unions that give partners all the same state legal rights as married couples. AP reports on the decision. Alliance Defending Freedom links to the pleadings in the case.

American Muslims and Copts Urge Egypt To Adopt Religious Equality and Secular Legal System In New Constitution

RNS reports on a letter released Tuesday from Muslim and Coptic Christian leaders in the United States calling on Egypt's new government that is drafting a constitution for the country to "recognize the equality of all Egyptians and to reject any language that would discriminate against any citizen of Egypt on the basis of that citizen's religion or gender." The letter also urged Egyptians to reject language that would describe Shariah as the source of the country's laws. Among those signing the letter were U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison; Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America; and Rev. Hegomen Moises Bogdady and the Rev. Michael Sorial, priests with the Coptic Orthodox Archdiocese of North America. The joint letter was sponsored by the Arab American Institute.

Suit Challenges Portion of Newly Approved Missouri Constitutional Amendment

Only one day after Missouri voters approved a state constitutional amendment providing extensive protections for religious expression (see prior posting), the ACLU announced the filing of a class action in federal district court challenging on federal constitutional grounds one aspect of the amendment. A portion of the amendment provides that the religious freedom rights of prisoners in state or local custody will be limited to the rights granted by federal law. More extensive religious liberty protections under the state constitution will not apply to prisoners. The class action complaint (full text) in Qandah v. Lombardi, (WD MO, filed 8/8/2012) contends that this withdraws existing state protections of religious liberty from prisoners in violation of the federal Establishment Clause and Equal Protection Clause. It alleges: "The challenged provision has the principal or primary effect of inhibiting religion among prisoners in Missouri."

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

8th Circuit Rejects Narrow Challenge To Hate Crimes Law

In United States v. Maybee, (8th Cir., Aug. 6, 2012), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld against a narrow constitutional attack the constitutionality of 18 USC 249(a)(1), one of the provisions of the Shepard-Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act. The section prohibits causing bodily injury to a person because of the person's actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin. The case involved an assault motivated by race and national origin. According to the court, both parties agreed that the constitutionality of the section depends on whether it is a proper exercise of Congress power under Section 2 of the 13th Amendment to ban "badges and incidents of slavery." The court rejected the claim that to be constitutional the section needed to not only require racial motivation, but also require that the assault be motivated by the victim’s enjoyment of a public benefit. AP reports on the decision. [Thanks to Michael Lieberman for the lead.]

Missouri Voters Overwhelmingly Approve Religious Expression Amendment

Missouri voters yesterday approved state Constitutional Amendment 2 by a vote of 82.8% in favor and 17.2% against. (Official results.) The measure was described briefly on the ballot:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to ensure: That the right of Missouri citizens to express their religious beliefs shall not be infringed; That school children have the right to pray and acknowledge God voluntarily in their schools; and That all public schools shall display the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution

The actual language added by the constitutional amendment is extensive. Here it is, slightly edited, and broken down by subject matter headings that I have inserted:

Anti-Establishment and Free Exercise Provisions:

neither the state nor any of its political subdivisions shall establish any official religion, nor shall a citizen's right to pray or express his or her religious beliefs be infringed;
the state shall not coerce any person to participate in any prayer or other religious activity, but shall ensure that any person shall have the right to pray individually or corporately in a private or public setting so long as such prayer does not result in disturbance of the peace or disruption of a public meeting or assembly;

Prayer On Public Property and Legislative Invocations:

citizens as well as elected officials and employees of the state of Missouri and its political subdivisions shall have the right to pray on government premises and public property so long as such prayers abide within the same parameters placed upon any other free speech under similar circumstances;
the General Assembly and the governing bodies of political subdivisions may extend to ministers, clergypersons, and other individuals the privilege to offer invocations or other prayers at meetings or sessions of the General Assembly or governing bodies;

Protection of Students' Religious Expression:

students may express their beliefs about religion in written and oral assignments free from discrimination based on the religious content of their work;
no student shall be compelled to perform or participate in academic assignments or educational presentations that violate his or her religious beliefs;
the state shall ensure public school students their right to free exercise of religious expression without interference, as long as such prayer or other expression is private and voluntary, whether individually or corporately, and in a manner that is not disruptive and as long as such prayers or expressions abide within the same parameters placed upon any other free speech under similar circumstances;

School Display of Bill of Rights:

to emphasize the right to free exercise of religious expression, all free public schools receiving state appropriations shall display, in a conspicuous and legible manner, the text of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States;

Prisoners Get No Additional Religious Rights:

this section shall not be construed to expand the rights of prisoners in state or local custody beyond those afforded by the laws of the United States.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports on the results.

Norwegian Children's Ombudsman Urges End To Ritual Circumcision of Boys

JTA reported Monday that Norway's ombudsman for children has proposed that Jews and Muslims replace circumcision of boys with a symbolic non-surgical ritual. Saying that "Muslim and Jewish children are entitled to the same protection as all other children," Dr. Anne Lindboe told a Norwegian paper last month that circumcision in boys is a violation of their right to make decisions about their own body. The president of Oslo's Jewish community responded that the mandate of Norway’s children’s ombudsman does not extend to devising Jewish rituals.

Lawsuit Challenges Proposed Eruv As Establishment Clause Violation

Last week, a group opposed to the creation of an eruv by Orthodox Jewish residents of the Village of Westhampton, New York filed suit in federal district court seeking a declaratory judgment that use of public property, including utility poles, to create a symbolic religious boundary violates the Establishment Clause. The suit also seeks an injunction against construction of the eruv, which is comprised largely of plastic strips running up utility poles to intersect with existing wires that create the symbolic boundary. The complaint (full text) in Jewish People for the Betterment of Westhampton Beach v. Village of Westhampton Beach, (ED NY, filed 7/30/2012), alleges that:

The eruv ... will mark certain wholly public spaces within the Village with religious significance. Indeed, it will invest a large portion of the Village with a narrow and parochial religious function.... [I]t will be a constant ... reminder to the community at large, that the secular public spaces of the Village have been transformed for religious use and identity; to the non-Jewish residents, that the Village and LIPA have given preferred status to the Jewish religion as the only faith to be permitted to permanently affix religious symbols to utility poles ... or to physically demarcate certain public spaces with particular religious significance; and to large portions of the Jewish community... that one particular form of Judaism has been preferred and endorsed by the Village over another.

Newsday on Sunday reported on the filing of the lawsuit. [Thanks to Pew Forum for the lead.]

American Bar Association Condemns Religious Profiling

At its annual meeting yesterday, the American Bar Association House of Delegates voted to expand its policy against racial and ethnic profiling by police to also condemn profiling on the basis of actual or perceived religious affiliation. (ABA Press Release). Resolution 116 (full text) still permits police to make mention of traditional religious dress when issuing a description of a suspect. A report (full text Word.doc) accompanying the text of the resolution says that, since 9/11, the FBI, customs and immigration enforcement, and local police are all profiling Muslims.