Street Preacher's Challenge To Permit Requirements Dismissed

In Craft v. Village of Lake George, New York, (ND NY, Aug. 7, 2014), a New York federal district court dismissed free speech, free exercise and equal protection challenges by a street preacher to the permit requirements of a resort town in New York's Adirondacks.  His "as applied" challenge to the solicitation permit requirements was dismissed because he denies ever soliciting money from passersby.  Thus "he could not be deprived of what he did not attempt or intend to exercise." HIs facial challenge to the seasonal permit requirement for handing out leaflets was held to be moot because the village subsequently made "sweeping changes" to the provisions of the Village Code being challenged.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Vincius Marinho, The Tension Between Normativity and Plurality in Religious Dogmas and in Constitutional Principles, (June 23, 2014).
• Carl Mosk, Liberal Nationalism, Religious Nationalism, and the Human Development Index, (July 16, 2014).
• Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, The Democracy We Left Behind in Greece and McCutcheon, (July 18, 2014).
• Cyra Akila Choudhury, From Bandung 1955 to Bangladesh 1971: Oppressed Populations, Self-Determination, and Third Worldist Failures in South Asia, (July 31, 2014).
• Todd E. Pettys, Doubting Abood, Finding Religion at Hobby Lobby, and More: Civil Cases in the Supreme Court's 2013-2014 Term, (Court Review, Vol. 50, Forthcoming).
• Houssem Eddine Bedoui & Walid Mansour, Performance and Maqasid al-Shari’ah’s Pentagon-Shaped Ethical Measurement, (July 16, 2014).

From SmartCILP:

• Ofra Friesel, Race versus Religion In the Making of the International Convention Against Racial Discrimination, [Abstract], 1965, 32 Law & History Review 351-383 (2014).
• Muhammad-Basheer Ismail, The 1979 United States-Iran Hostage Crisis Reviewed From an Islamic International Law Perspective, 42 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 19-40 (2013).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Wolcott v. Board of Rabbis of Northern and Southern California, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105841 (ED CA, Aug. 1, 2014), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's 250-page long complaint alleging  denial or restrictions on conversion to Judaism; hard cover books, materials and artifacts; numbers of books; religious packages; observance of holy days; kosher diet; facial beard; and a kosher work environment.

In Dilworth v. Goldberg, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106258 (SD NY, Au. 1, 2014), a New York federal district court allowed a former inmate to proceed with his claim that his religious freedom was infringed while in jail when he was not allowed to attend church services and had his Bible was confiscated.

In Moore v. Gloucester County Jail, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108600 (D NJ, Aug. 5, 2-14), a New Jersey federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's claim that he was not allowed to practice his religion properly.

In Rojas v. Heimgartner, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108855 (D KS, August 7, 2014), a Kansas federal district court dismissed free exercise, equal protection and Indian Religious Freedom Act claims challenging prison dress policy that limited adherents of Native American religious to wearing white bandana headbands at religious ceremonies, and denied them permission to wear colorful headbands.

In Dushane v. Sacramento County Jail, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108628 (ED CA, Aug. 5, 2014), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend a Muslim inmate's complaint that the director of chaplains denied kosher diets to Muslim inmates and limited them to vegetarian diets if they wished to observe their religious dietary requirements.

Consent Decree Allows Gospel Tracts At Street Festivals

In Price v, City of Fayetteville, North Carolina, (ED NC, Aug. 7, 2014), a North Carolina federal district court entered a consent decree enjoining the city from restricting distribution of religious literature at private festivals on public streets that are free open to the public.  This specifically includes the Dogwood Festival and the Independence Day Concert held in downtown Fayetteville-- venues at which last year police prevented plaintiffs Tom Price and William Legg  from distributing gospel tracts. WRAL News reports on the court's action. [Thanks to Paul de Mello for the lead.]

China Government Is Promoting A Chinese Version of Protestant Theology

China Daily this week reported on remarks by China's director of the State Administration for Religious Affairs outlining a 5-year campaign started last year to promote Christian theology in China. Wang Zuoan was speaking at a seminar in Shanghai on the Sinicization of Christianity, part of the celebration of the 60th anniversary of the founding of the National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China. The new government campaign is designed to adapt Protestant theology to China's national condition and Chinese culture. It will give guidance to Protestant churches in an attempt to promote theological ideas seen as positive and correct by the government.

Egyptian Court Dissolves Muslim Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party

In Egypt yesterday, the Supreme Administrative Court ordered dissolution of the Freedom and Justice Party, the political wing of the Muslim Brotherhood. Reuters and BBC News report that the decision, which excludes the party from running candidates in future elections, calls for seizure of the party's assets by the state. The government's Committee of Political Party Affairs had accused the FJP of irregularities. Among other things, police found that the party's headquarters had been used to store weapons. The court's decision may not be appealed. FJP's parent Muslim Brotherhood was banned and its assets were confiscated by court order last year. (See prior posting.)

New York City Health Department Orders 2 Mohels To Stop Controversial Circumcision Method After Infections

The Forward reported this week that the New York City Health Department has prohibited two mohels from performing Jewish religious circumcisions using the direct oral suction method (metzitzah b’peh) after infant boys allegedly contracted herpes infections from the two. The Health Department refuses to name the mohels  for privacy reasons.  New York City Health Department regulations adopted in 2012 require mohels to obtain written informed consent before using the controversial method for a circumcision. (See prior posting.) Only one of the two mohels targeted by the Health Department was able to produce the consent form for the infected infant.

Suit Claims Rabbi Sexually Assaulted Students At His Israeli Schools For Girls

Courthouse News Service and JTA report on a class action lawsuit filed last Monday in federal district court in Illinois against Rabbi Elimelech Meisels, his four Orthodox Jewish seminaries in Israel, the U.S. fundraising arm of the schools, and other alleged co-conspirators.  The lawsuit, alleging racketeering, fraud, breach of contract, emotional distress, conspiracy and conversion, claims that Meisels induced parents in the U.S. to send their daughters to his high-tuition seminaries where he would sexually assault the girls after developing mentorship relations with them. It is alleged that he kept his victims quiet in part by threatening to ruin their reputations and their chances for an appropriate marriage candidate. A Chicago Jewish religious court that learned of the problems urged parents not to send their children to the schools. The complaint alleges that at that point Meisels engaged in a sham sale of the seminaries to try to retain students.

Ten Commandments On City Hall Lawn Violates Establishment Clause

In Felix v. City of Bloomfield, (D NM, Aug. 7, 2014), in a decision described by the court as "a very close case," a New Mexico federal district court held that a 5-foot tall Ten Commandments monument on the lawn in front of the Bloomfield, New Mexico municipal building violates the Establishment Clause. The monument was constructed on city property by a former member of city council under a city council policy on the placement of monuments on the city lawn. Summarizing its 32-page decision, the court said:

a. Plaintiffs have Article III standing because they have regular, direct, and unwelcome contact with the Ten Commandments monument and therefore have suffered an “injury-in-fact”.... 

b. The Ten Commandments monument is government speech ... because the ... monument is a permanent object located on government property and it is not part of a designated public forum open to all on equal terms.

c. In view of the circumstances surrounding the context, history, and purpose of the Ten Commandments monument, it is clear that the City of Bloomfield has violated the Establishment Clause because its conduct in authorizing the continued display of the monument on City property has had the primary or principal effect of endorsing religion.

Suit Challenging Hebrew National Hot Dog Advertising Is Back In State Court

American Jewish World reports at length on the July 31 Minnesota state trial court hearing on a motion to dismiss in a long-running lawsuit against the manufacturer of Hebrew National hot dogs.  The suit, which alleges that ConAgra Food's advertising was deceptive because some of the meat in the hot dogs did not meet the proper standards for kosher slaughter, was remanded to state court by the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals last April. (See prior posting.) Prior decisions in the case have focused on whether the 1st Amendment bars the court from determining proper standards of kosher slaughter, and on whether any particular consumer can prove that the hot dogs he or she ate contained non-kosher meat.  At the conclusion of the hearing, the court asked the lawyers to file briefs on the issue of standing to bring the suit under consumer protection laws.

Bankruptcy Court, Applying Ministerial Exception, Rejects Defrocked Priest's Claim

In In re Archdiocese of Milwaukee, (ED WI Bankr., Aug. 6, 2014), a federal bankruptcy court held that the ministerial exception doctrine requires dismissal of a claim by by a defrocked Catholic priest for back pay and related amounts.  Marvin Thomas Knighton filed the claim in the bankruptcy reorganization of the Milwaukee Archdiocese, alleging that he was removed from the ministry after a canonical trial even though a state court jury found him not guilty of second degree sexual assault of a child. The court said in part:

[T]he First and Fourteenth Amendments permit hierarchical religious organizations to establish their own rules and regulations for internal discipline and government, and to create tribunals for adjudicating disputes over these matters. When this choice is exercised and ecclesiastical tribunals are created to decide disputes over the government and direction of subordinate bodies, the Constitution requires that civil courts accept their decisions as binding upon them.... Accordingly, this Court cannot second-guess whether the Debtor followed applicable law - whether Canon Law or federal employment discrimination law - in terminating or failing to compensate Mr. Knighton.

The court also found that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations and additionally rejected Knighton's suggestions of racial discrimination.

U.S. Drops Supplies To Yazidi Stranded In Iraq After Islamic State Attack

U.S. cargo planes yesterday dropped supplies to some 40,000 members of the Yazidi sect in Iraq who have fled the town of Sinjar after it was taken over by the insurgent group Islamic State (known variously as IS, ISIS or ISIL). The Yazidi follow an ancient religion that is related to Zoroastrianism. More than 100,000 Yazidi have fled northern Iraqi towns taken over by IS, and some 40,000 of them remain stranded on Mount Sinjar.  In a statement last night (full text), President Obama said:

ISIL forces ... have called for the systematic destruction of the entire Yezidi people, which would constitute genocide. 

Fox News and the Los Angeles Times have additional details.

In a related development, Reuters reports that on Wednesday an air strike by the Iraqi government targeted a Sharia court set up in the city of Mosul by IS. Sixty people were killed, including the judge.

Suit Against FLDS Towns Over Utility Denials Is Settled

Last March, an Arizona federal court jury awarded damages of nearly $5.3 million to Ronald and Jinjer Cooke who sued claiming religious discrimination after towns controlled by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in 2008 denied them access to water, sewers and electricity for the home they were building. They claimed that Hilldale, Utah and Colorado City, Arizona refused them utility service because they are not FLDS members. (See prior posting.) Reuters reported yesterday that the litigation has now been settled and the court has dismissed the case. The financial terms of the settlement were not disclosed. The couple now has utility services from the cities.

6th Circuit Hears Oral Arguments In Same-Sex Marriage Cases

The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday heard oral arguments in same-sex marriage cases from 4 states.  Here are links to the audio of the argument in each case:

• Michigan: DeBoer v. Snyder (Oral argument)
• Ohio: Obergefell v. Himes; Henry v. Himes (Oral argument).
• Kentucky: Bourke v. Beshar; Love v. Beshar (Oral argument).
• Tennessee: Tanco v. Haslem (Oral argument).

Detroit Free Press and MLive reported on the oral arguments.

Opponents of Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance Sue After Referendum Petitions Rejected

In May, Houston, Texas City Council passed an Equal Rights Ordinance that attracted significant opposition because of its ban on discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. (See prior posting.) Opponents have been circulating petitions to get a repeal referendum on the ballot. On Monday, the city ruled that there were insufficient valid signatures on the petitions.  As reported by the Houston Chronicle, strict city rules disqualify entire pages of signatures when those collecting them are not registered voters or did not themselves sign the petition.  On Tuesday, opponents of the ordinance filed suit in state court challenging the procedure used to disqualify signatures-- city attorneys eliminated numerous names after the City Secretary had initially determined that there were sufficient signatures. The lawsuit sought an immediate injunction against enforcement of the Equal Rights Ordinance. In response, the city has removed the lawsuit to federal court on the ground that one paragraph of the complaint raises a federal claim of interference with the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Houston Chronicle says that opponents of the Ordinance see this as a delaying tactic to prevent a state court injunction from being issued.

Rules Limiting Area Around State Fair Where Preacher Can Speak Upheld

In Powell v. Noble, (SD IA, Aug. 5, 2014), an Iowa federal district court in a 40-page opinion refused to issue a preliminary injunction in a Christian preacher's challenge to rules barring his proselytizing in areas around the Iowa State Fair where he might impede traffic flow. The court held preliminarily that the entire Fairgrounds are a limited public forum, at least  during the days the Fair is held.  Restrictions on activities that could impede traffic flow are reasonable. However the court did enjoin defendants from arresting plaintiff (or threatening arrest) solely for protected speech in locations where Defendants conceded there was not interference with traffic flow. Des Moines Register reports on the decision.

Utah Files First Cert Petition In Same-Sex Marriage Challenges

The state of Utah-- acting 6 weeks before its deadline-- yesterday became the first to file a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in the growing number of decisions striking down state bans on same sex-marriage. The petition (full text) in Herbert v. Kitchen urges Supreme Court review of the 10th Circuit's 2-1 decision (see prior posting), saying in part:

This case presents an immensely important question: whether the United States Constitution compels states to adopt a single marriage policy that every individual is allowed “to marry the person of their choice.”... The Tenth Circuit said yes and struck down Utah’s definition—statutorily enacted and adopted into the Utah Constitution by two-thirds of voters in a statewide referendum—that marriage is only between a man and a woman. That ruling deprives Utah citizens of the “fundamental right” to “act through a lawful electoral process,” ... and ignores that the Constitution says nothing about how states must define marriage.

Salt Lake Tribune reports on the filing, and SCOTUS Blog has more background.

NYC Pre-Kindergarten Funding Requires Religious Schools To Draw Fine Church-State Lines

The New York Times reported Monday on the fine church-state lines being drawn by religious schools hosting Mayor de Blasio's government-funded pre-kindergarten programs. Brief guidelines issued to the schools allow the teaching of culture, but not religion. Religious texts may be presented objectively as part of a secular program of instruction.  The Times describes the accommodation reached by some schools:

The biblical story of Noah’s Ark will be taught, without mention of who told Noah to build it. Challah, the Jewish bread eaten on the Sabbath, will be baked, but no blessings said over it. Some crucifixes will be removed, but others left hanging.

(See prior related posting.) [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

District Court Says Town of Greece Decision Does Not Cover Invocations Offered Directly By County Board Members

After the U.S. Supreme Court decided the Town of Greece case last May, a number of local governments that had been enjoined by lower courts from opening council meetings with sectarian prayers petitioned lower courts to dissolve or modify the injunctions.  One of these was Pittsylvania County, Virginia. However, in Hudson v. Pittsylvania County, Virginia, (WD VA, Aug. 4, 2014), the federal district court held that while it was willing to modify its prior injunction, it would not dissolve it:

... unlike in Town of Greece, where invited clergy and laypersons offered the invocations, the Board members themselves led the prayers in Pittsylvania County. Thus, in contrast to Town of Greece, where the town government had no role in determining the content of the opening invocations at its board meetings, the government of Pittsylvania County itself, embodied in its elected Board members, dictated the content of the prayers opening official Board meetings. Established as it was by the Pittsylvania County government, that content was consistently grounded in the tenets of one faith. Further, because the Pittsylvania County Board members themselves served as exclusive prayer providers, persons of other faith traditions had no opportunity to offer invocations.

While the court was willing to modify the injunction to make it consistent with Town of Greece, it concluded it did not have jurisdiction to do so until the 4th Circuit to which the case had been appealed granted at least a limited remand. AP reports on the decision.

Trial Court Invalidates Florida's Ban On Recognizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Tampa Bay Times reports that in a ruling on Monday, a Broward County, Florida trial court judge invalidated the 2008 amendment to the Florida Constitution that prohibits recognition of any "legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof." The ruling comes in a case in which plaintiff  Heather Brassner asked the Florida court to dissolve her same-sex Vermont civil union. The court concluded that it could not do so without first ruling on the constitutionality of Florida's same-sex marriage ban. After ruling, the court immediately stayed the order, pending appeal. This is the third Florida trial court ruling since July invalidating Florida's same-sex marriage ban. (See prior posting.) Yesterday's opinion in Brassner v. Lade does not appear to be available online yet, but here is the full text of plaintiff's motion for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief.