There are no factual allegations in the complaint that support an inference that injury to plaintiff, economic or otherwise, is “actual and imminent” as required to constitute an injury in fact under Article III standing principles.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Thursday, September 13, 2018
Teacher Lacks Standing To Challenge Contraceptive Mandate Exemptions
In Campbell v. Trump, (D CO, Sept. 11, 2018), a Colorado federal district court held that a teacher in a private school lacks standing to challenge the Trump administration rules that allow employers to refuse on religious or moral grounds to provide health insurance coverage for contraceptive services. Plaintiff currently has coverage in her employer's policy but argues that she fears her employer might withdraw coverage. The court held:
Labels:
Colorado,
Contraceptive coverage mandate,
Standing