Cert. Petition Filed In Defense of Marriage Act Challenge

A petition for certiorari (full text) was filed Friday in Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives v. Gill. In the case, decided by the 1st Circuit under the title Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the appeals court held unconstitutional Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act that denies federal benefits to same-sex couples (and surviving same-sex spouses) lawfully married in Massachusetts and other states. (See prior posting.)  The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group that filed the cert. petition was intervenor-appellant in the court of appeals below.  SCOTUS Blog reports on the filing of the cert. petition. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Obergefell Will Be Applied Retroactively To Social Security Claims

42 USC Sec. 416(h)(1)(A)(i) provides that whether a person is the spouse of another for Social Security purposes depends on the law of their state of domicile.  Until now this has led the Social Security Administration to deny benefits to same-sex spouses who moved to or lived in a state which did not recognize their marriage.  However, in an Aug. 20 press release, Lambda Legal reported:

Today, in a status conference with Lambda Legal in federal court in Chicago, the Department of Justice announced that the Social Security Administration (SSA) will apply the U.S. Supreme Court's recent landmark marriage ruling retroactively and process pending spousal benefits claims for same-sex couples who lived in states that did not previously recognize their marriages. According to the Department of Justice, the new policy will apply to previously filed claims still pending in the administrative process or litigation.

Planned Defenses In Canadian Polygamy Case Disclosed

As previously reported, Canadian authorities in British Columbia have brought polygamy charges against two rival religious leaders in the town of Bountiful, home to polygamous religious communities, including the FLDS. Yesterday an AFP story outlined the defenses that attorneys say they will raise in the high-profile case. Blair Suffredine, lawyer for defendant Winston Blackmore, says he will argue that polygamy is protected under Canada's constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion, even though the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms permits "reasonable limitations" on protected rights. He argues that if a man lived with ten women he did not marry, there would be no crime, and that there is not a societal interest in punishing so-called "celestial marriage" to multiple wives. He also says he will argue that since same-sex marriage is legal in Canada, polygamy should also be treated in the same way.

6th Circuit: Damage Action Against Kim Davis Is Not Moot

In Ermold v. Davis, (6th Cir., May 2, 2017), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated a damage action against Rowan County, Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis brought by a same-sex couple who had been denied a marriage license by Davis.  The district court had dismissed the case because subsequent legislative action and an Executive Order by the governor assured that marriage licenses are now being issued to same-sex couples. The court held, however, that where a suit only seeks damages for past injury, a change in defendant's conduct does not moot the controversy.  Judge Siler also filed a concurring opinion emphasizing that the district court still might find that Davis was protected by Kentucky's Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [Thanks to Tom Rutledge for the lead.]

President Objects To House Passed Defense Bill's LGBT Related Provisions

The U.S House of Representatives last week passed, and sent to the Senate, HR 4310, the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (full text.)  The bill contains two provisions relating to same-sex unions and to broader issues of conscience rights in relation to gays and lesbians.  Section 536 of the bill provides in part:

(a) Protection of Rights of Conscience- The Armed Forces shall accommodate the conscience and sincerely held moral principles and religious beliefs of the members of the Armed Forces concerning the appropriate and inappropriate expression of human sexuality and may not use such conscience, principles, or beliefs as the basis of any adverse personnel action, discrimination, or denial of promotion, schooling, training, or assignment.....

(b) Protection of Chaplains- .... (2) No member of the Armed Forces may--

(A) direct, order, or require a chaplain to perform any duty, rite, ritual, ceremony, service, or function that is contrary to the conscience, moral principles, or religious beliefs of the chaplain, or contrary to the moral principles and religious beliefs of the endorsing faith group of the chaplain; or 

(B) discriminate or take any adverse personnel action against a chaplain, including denial of promotion, schooling, training, or assignment, on the basis of the refusal by the chaplain to comply with a direction, order, or requirement prohibited by subparagraph (A)....

Section 537 of the bill provides:

A military installation or other property owned or rented by, or otherwise under the jurisdiction or control of, the Department of Defense may not be used to officiate, solemnize, or perform a marriage or marriage-like ceremony involving anything other than the union of one man with one woman.

Last week the White House issued a Statement of Administration Policy objecting to several provisions in the bill.  The Statement says in part:

The Administration strongly objects to sections 536 and 537 because those provisions adopt unnecessary and ill-advised policies that would inhibit the ability of same-sex couples to marry or enter a recognized relationship under State law.  Section 536 would prohibit all personnel-related actions based on certain religious and moral beliefs, which, in its overbroad terms, is potentially harmful to good order and discipline.  Section 537 would obligate DOD to deny Service members, retirees, and their family members access to facilities for religious ceremonies on the basis of sexual orientation, a troublesome and potentially unconstitutional limitation on religious liberty.

LifeSite News on Tuesday reported on the controversy over these provisions.

Israel's Justice Minister Officiates At Same-Sex Jewish Wedding; Marriage Not Legally Recognized

In Israel yesterday, Justice Minister Tzipi Livni officiated at a same-sex wedding ceremony, even though the marriage will not be recognized by the Israeli government.  Jerusalem Post reports that Livni conducted the ceremony for Tsach Sa'ar, a former aide to a member of the Knesset, and Guy Arad, an attorney.  The ceremony used a traditional huppah (wedding canopy), and the traditional breaking of a glass by the groom used two glasses, one for each man to break. Posting pictures on her Facebook page, Livni wrote that the ceremony was not intended to be a provocation against Judaism, but instead respected Jewish tradition.  She added, "In our eyes, Judaism is open, accepting and respects all people who were created in God's image."

United Methodist Church Risks Split Over Position On LBTQ Ordination and Marriage

HuffPost reports that the United Methodist Church will likely break apart after a close vote yesterday at its 2019 General Conference on LGBTQ roles in the Church. As reported by United Methodist News Service, the delegates adopted the so-called "Traditional Plan" by a vote of 438 to 384.  This plan continues the Church's ban on ordaining LGBTQ clergy and the prohibition on officiating at or hosting same-sex weddings. The opposing "One Church Plan" was defeated by a vote of  449 to 374.  It would have allowed ordination LGBTQ pastors, and allowed, but not required, churches to host and pastors to officiate at same-sex marriages.  Later, by a vote of 405 to 395, the Conference asked the Church's Judicial Council to rule on the constitutionality of the Traditional Plan at its scheduled April meeting.

Developments From The Vatican Last Week

Several developments of interest came from the Vatican last week:

As reported by AP, Pope Benedict XVI met in the Vatican prison on Saturday with his former butler Paolo Gabriele and granted him a pardon. Gabriele had been sentenced to 18 months in jail for stealing the Pope's private correspondence, some of which were published in a best-selling book by Italian journalist Gianluigi Nuzzi. (See prior posting.)

On Saturday, the Vatican announced the appointment of Boston canon lawyer Rev. Robert W. Oliver as promoter of justice for the Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith, the Vatican office charged with protecting church doctrine. As reported by the Boston Globe, this makes Oliver the Vatican's chief prosecutor of priests charged with sexual abuse of minors. He succeeds Monsignor Charles Scicluna who has been named auxiliary bishop in Malta. The director of Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests criticized Oliver's appointment, saying that he lacks credibility because he never publicly called for the ouster of Boston's Cardinal Bernard Law.

On Friday, the Pope delivered his Christmas greetings to the Roman Curia. (Full text). As reported by Catholic World, while the Pope's extensive remarks were widely headlined as an attack on same-sex marriage, in fact he spoke in broader philosophical terms. Focusing on "a new philosophy of sexuality" in the western world, he said in part:

According to this philosophy, sex is no longer a given element of nature, that man has to accept and personally make sense of: it is a social role that we choose for ourselves, while in the past it was chosen for us by society.... People dispute the idea that they have a nature, given by their bodily identity, that serves as a defining element of the human being. They deny their nature and decide that it is not something previously given to them, but that they make it for themselves.... When the freedom to be creative becomes the freedom to create oneself, then necessarily the Maker himself is denied and ultimately man too is stripped of his dignity as a creature of God....

British Religious Leaders Want Special Judicial Panel To Hear Religious Rights Cases

Today's London Times reports that Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, and other church leaders will support a motion being filed by attorneys for Christain relationship counsellor Gary McFarlane calling for a special Court of Appeals panel of five judges who understand religious issues to be appointed to hear McFarlane's appeal and future appeals involving religious rights. At issue in McFarlane's case is a ruling by the Employment Appeal Tribunal that religious discrimination prohibitions were not violated when McFarlane was dismissed by a counselling service for refusing to counsel same-sex couples. (See prior posting.) Critics of the court say that a series of rulings have shown a lack of understanding of Christian beliefs. They point especially to an opinion by Lord Neuberger, the Master of the Rolls, rejecting a complaint by marriage registrar Lillian Ladele who was disciplined when she refused to perform civil partnership ceremonies for same-sex couples. (See prior posting.)

9 Alabama Counties Stop Issuing Marriage Licenses In Response To Marriage Equality Ruling

AP reports today that in at least 9 of Alabama's 67 counties judges have completely stopped issuing marriage licences now that the U.S. Supreme Court has legalized same-sex marriages.  The judges are relying on a 1961 change in Alabama's law that made it optional rather than mandatory for probate courts to issue marriage licences.  This has created a region in southwest Alabama with a population of 78,000 in which residents will have to travel to other counties to obtain a license.

Ohio Gubernatorial Candidates Take Different Approaches To Public Religious Expression

Yesterday's Columbus Dispatch explores the difference in the public expression of religion by Ohio's two gubernatorial candidates:

Gov. John Kasich doesn’t hide his religious convictions, talking about them frequently in speeches and at other public gatherings.

Ed FitzGerald holds religious values but rarely talks about them.

Although they espouse many of the same principles, the contrast in how Ohio’s gubernatorial candidates apply their Christianity to their public life and policies is stark.

While Democrat FitzGerald, the Cuyahoga County executive, favors abortion rights and supports same-sex marriage as public policy, the lifelong Catholic won’t say how he feels about those issues personally....

Kasich, a Republican who was raised Catholic but became a Protestant after his parents were killed by a drunken driver in 1987, cites God regularly in public, such as in justifying the building of a Holocaust Memorial on the Statehouse grounds, expanding Medicaid to more than a quarter-million Ohioans, in graduation speeches, in his State of the State addresses and even during an event launching a campaign to prevent the elderly from falling....

DOMA Held Unconstitutional By Federal District Court

A California federal district court has held that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional.  In Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel Management, (ND CA, Feb. 22, 2012), the court held that the equal protection rights of a female staff attorney employed by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals were infringed when the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts refused to process her application to add her same-sex spouse to her family coverage health insurance plan. The court concluded that heightened scrutiny should apply when reviewing statutory classifications based on sexual orientation. It added, however, that even under rational basis review, the statute fails.

In applying heightened scrutiny, the court rejected four justifications identified by Congress in enacting DOMA: (1) encouraging responsible procreation and child-rearing; (2) defending and nurturing the institution of traditional, heterosexual marriage; (3) defending traditional notions of morality; and (4) preserving scarce government resources. In applying rational basis review, the court also examined three other justifications that Congress might have had:  (1) preserving the status quo in the federal definition of marriage while waiting for the states to tinker with the traditional definition of marriage; (2) an interest in remaining cautious in an area of so much social divisiveness; and (3) avoiding the inconsistency of eligibility for federal benefits turning on the vagaries of state law. The San Jose Mercury News reports on the decision. [Thanks to Volokh Conspiracy for the lead.]

Dismissal of Title VII Suit By Teacher Fired By Catholic School Is Denied

In Ference v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg, (WD PA, Jan. 18, 2022), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge recommended denying a motion to dismiss filed by the Catholic Diocese in a Title VII sex-discrimination lawsuit by a Lutheran 6th-grade teacher in a Catholic school who was fired shortly after being hired when the school discovered that he was in a same-sex marriage. The Diocese had raised defenses based on Title VII's exemption for religious discrimination, the church autonomy doctrine, the ministerial exception and RFRA.

Appeal Filed Seeking Acceptance of D.C. Marriage Initiative Petition

Having lost in their attempt to obtain a referendum (see prior posting), opponents of Washington, D.C.'s new law recognizing same-sex marriages performed elsewhere filed an initiative petition in September. The Marriage Initiative would provide that only a marriage between a man and a woman would be recognized in D.C. In an order issued on Tuesday, In Re: Marriage Initiative of 2009, (DC Bd. Elec. & Ethics, Nov. 17, 2009), the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics ruled that because the initiative would violate the D.C. Human Rights Act, under D.C.'s Initiative, Referendum and Recall Procedures Act it was required to reject the initiative petition.

Yesterday, several proponents of the initiative filed suit seeking court review of the Election Board's ruling. The complaint (full text) in Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, (DC Super. Ct., filed 11/18/2009), challenges the restriction in D.C. law that precludes using the initiative for any measure that would authorize discrimination in violation of the Human Rights Act. It also argues that the Initiative does not violate the HRA. Alliance Defense Fund issued a release announcing that the appeal had been filed.

Bachman's Religious Views Traced In New Yorker Article

The New Yorker this week carries a long article on Michelle Bachman titled Leap of Faith-- The Making of a Republican Front-Runner.  The piece, by Ryan Lizza, gives special attention to the content and development of Bachman's religious beliefs.  Lizza writes:

Bachmann belongs to a generation of Christian conservatives whose views have been shaped by institutions, tracts, and leaders not commonly known to secular Americans, or even to most Christians. Her campaign is going to be a conversation about a set of beliefs more extreme than those of any American politician of her stature, including Sarah Palin, to whom she is inevitably compared. Bachmann said in 2004 that being gay is “personal enslavement,” and that, if same-sex marriage were legalized, “little children will be forced to learn that homosexuality is normal and natural and that perhaps they should try it.” Speaking about gay-rights activists, that same year, she said, “It is our children that is the prize for this community.” She believes that evolution is a theory that has “never been proven,” and that intelligent design should be taught in schools.

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Travis Gasper, A Religious Right to Discriminate: Hobby Lobby and 'Religious Freedom' as a Threat to the LGBT Community, (Texas A&M Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Gila Stopler,The Challenge of Strong Religion in the Liberal State, (32(2) Boston University International Law Journal 411-448 (2014)).
• Joel Harrison & Patrick Parkinson, Freedom Beyond the Commons: Managing the Tension between Faith and Equality in a Multicultural Society, ((2014) 40 Monash University Law Review 413).
• Joel Harrison, Debating Rights and Same-Gender Relationships, (October 12, 2015).
• Jack Tsen-Ta Lee, Equality and Singapore's First Constitutional Challenges to the Criminalization of Male Homosexual Conduct, (Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, vol 16(1-2), pp 150-185 (2015)).
• Stephen F. Befort & Michael Vargas, Same-Sex Marriage and Title VII, (Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 56, 2015).
• Virgemarie A. Salazar, Islamic Perspectives on Democracy, (December 3, 2014).
• Jennifer Ann Urban, Islamic Financing - A Successful Takeoff or a Crash Landing? Whether or Not Islamic Financing Should Be Used to Finance and Lease Aircraft, (2015).
• Virgemarie A. Salazar, Theocracy in Iran: From an Ideology to an Islamic Republic, (February 1, 2014).

From SmartCILP:

• Isabelle R. Gunning, Lawyers of All Faiths: Constructing Professional Identity and Finding Common Ground, [Abstract], 39 Journal of the Legal Profession 231-272 (2015).
• Sr. Helen PreJean, Letter To a Law Student, Dear Young Person, 8 DePaul Journal for Social Justice 151-160 (2015).

Recent Books:

• John  Witte, Jr., The Western Case for Monogamy Over Polygamy, (Cambridge Univ. Press, May 2015).
• Robin Griffith-Jones & Mark Hill (eds.), Magna Carta, Religion and the Rule of Law, (Cambridge Univ. Press, April 2015).
• John Slight, The British Empire and the Hajj 1865-1956, (Harvard Univ. Press, Sept. 2015).
• John L. Esposito, Tamara Sonn & John O. Voll, Islam and Democracy after the Arab Spring, (Oxford Univ. Press, Nov. 2015).

Fragmented Decision Upholds Business' Refusal to Print LGBT Pride T-Shirts

In a 2-1 decision yesterday, the Kentucky Court of Appeals concluded that a business which prints customized T-shirts was not in violation of a county's public accommodation law when it refused to print T-shirts for a local LGBT Pride Festival. At issue in Lexington Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission v. Hands On Originals, Inc., (KY Ct. App., May 12, 2017), was the policy of a business which prints customized t-shirts, mugs, pens, and other accessories "to refuse any order that would endorse positions that conflict with the convictions of the ownership."

Chief Judge Kramer, writing the court's opinion, held that the business, Hands On Originals (HOO), never refused goods or services to a customer on the basis the customer's sexual orientation or gender identity because the order was placed by an organization which has no sexual orientation of gender identity. Neither did HOO deny goods or services because the customer was engaging in conduct engaged in exclusively or predominantly by a protected class of people. Judge Kramer explained, saying in part:

The acts of homosexual intercourse and same-sex marriage are conduct engaged in exclusively or predominantly by persons who are homosexual. But anyone—regardless of religion, sexual orientation, race, gender, age, or corporate status—may espouse the belief that people of varying sexual orientations have as much claim to unqualified social acceptance as heterosexuals. Indeed, the posture of the case before us underscores that very point: this case was initiated and promoted by Aaron Baker, a non-transgendered man in a married, heterosexual relationship who nevertheless functioned at all relevant times as the President of the GLSO.

Judge Lambert concurred only in the result and filed a separate opinion contending that HOO is protected in its conduct because of the Kentucky Religious Freedom Restoration Statute.  She said in part:

HOO refused to print the shirts because the HOO owners believe the lifestyle choices promoted by GSLO conflict with their Christian values.

Judge Taylor dissented, saying in part:

The majority takes the position that the conduct of HOO in censoring the publication of the desired speech sought by GLSO does not violate the Fairness Ordinance. Effectively, that would mean that the ordinance protects gays or lesbians only to the extent they do not publicly display their same gender sexual orientation. This result would be totally contrary to legislative intent and undermine the legislative policy of LFUCG since the ordinance logically must protect against discriminatory conduct that is inextricably tied to sexual orientation or gender identity. Otherwise, the ordinance would have limited or no force or effect.

 Lexington Herald Leader reports on the decision.

Texas AG Says City's Ban On Officials Demonstrating Bias By Word or Deed is Unconstitutional

On Thursday, the San Antonio, Texas city council adopted, by a vote of 8-3 an ordinance (full text) expanding its non-discrimination bans to include discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity and veteran status. It provides, however, that nothing in the ordinance "shall be construed as requiring any person or organization to support or advocate any particular lifestyle or religious view, or advance any particular message or idea." One of the most controversial portions of the new law is the provision that:

No appointed official or member of a board or commission shall engage in discrimination or demonstrate a bias, by word or deed, against any person, group of persons, or organization on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, veteran status, age or disability, while acting in their official capacity while in such public position.

The Texas Tribune reported Friday that state attorney general Greg Abbott takes the position that this ban violates the free speech and free exercise provisions of the Texas and U.S. constitutions and opens the city to possible lawsuits. He says that the provision could expose officials to removal from office for speaking in favor of Texas' constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

Fired Gay Church Music Director Files Discrimination Complaints

Yesterday's Chicago Tribune reports that Colin Collette, who had been employed for 17 years as a  music director at Holy Family Catholic Community in Inverness, Illinois, has filed discrimination complaints with the federal EEOC and the Cook County Human Rights Commission. Collette was fired in July after he announced that-- now that same-sex marriage is legal in Illinois-- he was engaged to be married to his longtime partner Will Nifong.  Collette says church leaders knew he was gay long before he posted his engagement notice on Facebook.  His complaints, naming a priest and a parish manager as respondents, allege discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation and marital status.

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Seval Yildirim, Global Tangles: Law, Headcoverings and Religious Identity, (Santa Clara Journal of International Law, Forthcoming).
• Faisal Bhabha, From Saumur to L. (S.): Tracing the Theory and Concept of Religious Freedom under Canadian Law, (58 Supreme Court Law Review (2d), 2012).
• Faisal Bhabha, R v. NS: What's Fair in a Trial? The Supreme Court of Canada's Divided Opinion on the Niqab in the Courtroom, (Alberta Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Carl H. Esbeck, Unwanted Exposure to Religious Expression by Government: Standing and the Establishment Clause, (7 Charleston L. Rev. no. 1 ___ (forthcoming 2013)).
• Bruce Ledewitz, The Vietnam Draft Cases and the Pro-Religion Equality Project, (Duquesne University School of Law Research Paper (May 6, 2013)).
• Bryan Dearinger, The Future of Taxpayer Standing in Establishment Clause Tax Credit Cases, (Oregon Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Lapo Filistrucchi and Jens Prufer, Nonprofits are Not Alike: The Role of Catholic and Protestant Affiliation, (TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2013-013 (April 26, 2013)).

From SmartCILP:

• Radwa S. Elsaman and Mohamed A. 'Arafa, The Rights of the Elderly in the Arab Middle East: Islamic Theory versus Arabic Practice, 14 Marquette Elder's Advisor 1-53 (2012).
• Eric D. Yordy, Caught in the Clause: An Analysis of Same-Sex Marriage Through the Lens of the Establishment Clause, 22 Tulane Journal of Law & Sexuality 55-89 (2013).
• Invisible Constitutions: Culture, Religion, and Memory. Articles by Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im, Kathryn E. Fort, Jeffrey A. Redding, Jelte Olthof, Monica Eppinger, Semahagn G. Abebe and Michal Jan Rozbicki. 57 St. Louis University Law Journal 287-455 (2013).

Recent and Forthcoming Books of Interest:

• Michael D'Antonio, Mortal Sins: Sex, Crime, and the Era of Catholic Scandal, (Thomas Dunne Books, April 2013).
• Carolyn Renée Dupont, Mississippi Praying: Southern White Evangelicals and the Civil Rights Movement, 1945-1970, (New York Univ. Press, Aug. 2013).
• John Ragosta, Religious Freedom: Jefferson’s Legacy, America's Creed, (Univ. of Virginia Press, April 2013).