Ministerial Exception and Ecclesiastical Abstention Doctrines Require Dismissal of Suit By Former Catholic Cemetery Employee

In Fisher v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, (OH App., March 14, 2014), an Ohio state appellate court dismissed a suit by Vickie Fisher, the former co-director of a Catholic cemetery, whose job was eliminated by a new cemetery executive director. In her suit, Fisher alleged age discrimination, promissory estoppel, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.  The court held that the ministerial exception doctrine applies to require dismissal:

Fisher was responsible for coordinating services in the chapel, working with grieving families, coordinating services with various parishes, and attending grave-site services. She interacted with clergy on a daily basis, and employed her status as a person “of the faith” to console grieving families. Fisher conducted these duties in a liturgical setting replete with religious statuary, photographs of the Pope and Archbishop, and a dispensary for Rosaries. 

Fisher also underwent multi-year, doctrine-specific training at a Jesuit Catholic University to better perform her job. She was involved in the preparation and performance of religious rituals. As codirector of the cemetery, she served in an indisputable leadership position, acting as the face of the Catholic Church to thousands of grieving families. And like the plaintiff in Hosanna-Tabor, she saw herself as part of a larger ministry.

To the extent that the ministerial exception doctrine does not apply to Fisher's common law claims, the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine does: "Fisher’s claims would invariably interject this court into the Archdiocese’s internal affairs."

Judge DeWine concurred separately to urge that the court need not go beyond the ministerial exception doctrine to dismiss the lawsuit.

New Murfreesboro Lawsuit Challenges Muslim Cemetery

In Murfreesboro, Tennessee, where opponents of an Islamic Center engaged in several years of high-profile litigation beginning in 2010 (see prior posting), a new lawsuit has been filed challenging county approval of a Muslim cemetery on a portion of the Islamic Center's property.  By a 3-2 vote, the Rutherford County Board of Zoning Appeals in January approved the cemetery which will not use caskets or burial vaults.  According to the Murfreesboro Daily News-Journal, plaintiffs are attempting to require additional hearings, studies and permits before the cemetery can be approved. The case is being heard next week by the same trial court judge who ruled-- in a decision that was reversed by higher courts-- that inadequate public notice had been given before the mosque construction was approved.

Umbrella Group of U.S. Muslim Organizations Formed

Religion News Service reported last week on the formation of a new umbrella group-- the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations. Comprised of ten existing Muslim organizations, the new advocacy group will first move to conduct a census of U.S. Muslims to determine their highest priority issues. Its ultimate goal is to protect civil rights, advocate on issues of concern and have a greater impact on American politics by increasing Muslim participation in the 2016 elections.

Guesthouse Owners In Britain Going To European Court In Try To Limit Double Rooms To Married Couples

In Britain, the Christian Legal Centre announced today that Jeff and Sue Green, the owners of a guesthouse in Wales, are applying directly to the European Court of Human Rights to obtain a ruling that would allow them to reflect their Christian beliefs by renting double rooms only to married couples.  The UK Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) challenged the owners' policy, informing them that it is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation.  EHRC dropped the case when the Greens agreed to offer only single beds in all rooms. However the Greens are continuing to pursue their case. They are not first going through the British courts because last year's UK Supreme Court opinion in Bull v. Hall (see prior posting) indicates that it would be fruitless to do so. The Telegraph has additional details.

Suit Seeks Damages From California Cult

Courthouse News Service today reports on a lawsuit filed in state court in Riverside, California by Linda Grindstaff against "Emissaries of Divine Light", a California spiritual group which Grinstaff characterizes as a cult.  The complaint outlines an elaborate series of events involving Grinstaff donating $50,000 to the cult, and her then being defrauded out of her home which she built on property purchased by the cult with her donated funds. She was manipulated into performing menial work without pay for the cult for some 50 hours per week, and paying additional amounts for food and medical care. The cult also was allegedly responsible for destroying Grindstaff's marriage by encouraging her husband to have sex with many women he counseled. The suit alleges breach of contract, fraud, and infliction of emotional distress, and seeks a variety of relief including quieting title to Grinstaff's home, a constructive trust and punitive damages.

South Carolina Divorce Action Challenges Ban On Same-Sex Marriage

A suit filed last week in Family Court in Greenville, South Carolina could be the vehicle for testing the constitutionality of South Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage. According to WYFF News, Cathy Swicegood is seeking a divorce from her same-sex partner of 13 years, claiming that the pair should be treated as married under South Carolina's statute that recognizes common law marriages entered prior to 2011. (Background.) In order to succeed, Swicegood will need the court to declare that South Carolina laws treating same-sex marriages as void are unconstitutional. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Ratna Kapur, A Leap of Faith: The Construction of Hindu Majoritarianism in Secular Law, (113 (1) South Atlantic Quarterly 109-128 (2014)).
• Pamela Foohey, Perspectives on Religious Organizations' Reorganizations, (87 American Bankruptcy Law Journal (2014 Forthcoming)).
• Mary E. McMahon, May I Be Excused? Smith's Individualized Governmental Assessment Exception and the HHS Mandate, (Journal of Catholic Legal Studies, 2014).
• Eric Segall, Silence is Golden: Moments of Silence, Legislative Prayers, and the Establishment Clause, (Northwestern University Law Review Online, Vol. 108, 2014).
• Tyler Antone Le Fevre, Gender and the Institutional Nature of Marriage, (March 11, 2014).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:

• Evelyn Lincoln & Pascale Rihouet, Brands of Piety, 47 University of California Davis Law Review 679-703 (2013).
• USCIRF Policy Brief, Prisoners of Belief: Individuals Jailed under Blasphemy Laws, (March 2014).

Recent Books:

• J. Brent Walker, What a Touchy Subject!: Religious Liberty and Church-State Separation, (Nurturing Faith Inc., February 2014).
• John W. Compton, The Evangelical Origins of the Living Constitution,  (Harvard University Press, March 2014).
• Barry Rubin and Wolfgang G. Schwanitz, Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern Middle East, (Yale University Press, Feb. 2014).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Chernetsky v. Nevada, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29571 (D NV, March 7, 2014), a Nevada federal district court adopted in part and rejected in part a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29574, Jam 17, 2014) and rejected a Wiccan inmate's complaint that he was barred from possessing certain religious property and engaging in various Wiccan rituals.  However the court held that, while authorities are not required to build a new sweat lodge for plaintiff, he should be permitted to use an existing one on terms comparable to those for Native American use.

In Debarr v. Carpenter, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29588 (D NV, March 6, 2014), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29580, Jan. 13, 2014) and dismissed plaintiff's claim that he was retaliated against for protesting flattening of religious grounds used by pagan inmates. The court also concluded that disciplinary action and transfer because of the coordinated action by pagan inmates in filing over 300 grievances in less than a month was proper.

In Robinson v. Crutchfield, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30660 (SD OH, March 10, 2014), an Ohio federal district court denied a temporary restraining order to a Muslim inmate who sought halal meals that include meat rather than the prison's vegetarian diet provided to those who request halal meals.

In Conway v. Purves, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30255 (ED MI, March 10, 2014), a Michigan federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30767, Feb. 12, 2014) and permitted Muslim plaintiffs to move ahead with their complaint over the nutritional adequacy of the meals provided during Ramadan.

In Incumaa v. Stirling, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31559 (D SC, March 11, 2014), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185985, Sept. 24, 2013) and dismissed plaintiff's claim that his religious exercise and due process rights were violated when prison officials designated Nation of Gods and Earths (Five Percenters) a security threat group.

In Johnson v. Solomon, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32025 (WD NC, March 12, 2014), a North Carolina federal district court permitted an inmate to proceed with his claim that he is being denied a kosher diet that complies with his Hebrew Israelite beliefs.

In Njos v. Carney, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32812 (MD PA, March 11, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32092, Feb. 19, 2014) and permitted plaintiff who claims to be Jewish to move ahead with his complaint that he was removed from the kosher diet progran and that he was not given adequate amounts of  juice and matzo for use in his Sabbath ritual.

In Coward v. Jabe, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32128 (ED VA, March 10, 2014), a Virginia federal district court upheld prison officials' decision to classify Nation of Gods and Earths as a gang rather than a religion, and their confiscation of of certain NGE publications from plaintiff's mail.

In Smith v. Perlman, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32362 (ND NY, March 13, 2014), a New York federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32554, Feb. 18, 2014) and dismissed a Mulsim inmate's complaint that he was denied a combined halal and therapeutic diet, hat he could not attend religious services while in keeplock, and that he was allowed only one family participation event per year.

USA Today reports on the Iowa Department of Corrections settlement of a lawsuit earlier this month in which it agreed, after a federal magistrate's decision in plaintiff's favor, to provide an inmate who is an adherent of Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan (a Hindu sect) with prepackaged food that is free of contact with pots, pans or utensils that had previously touched meats, eggs, mayonnaise, onions or garlic.

Narrow Injunction Requires Tennessee To Recognize Marriages of 3 Same-Sex Couples

As reported by SCOTUSblog, on Friday a Tennessee federal district court issued a narrow preliminary injunction requiring Tennessee to recognize the same-sex marriages of the three couples who are plaintiffs in the case and who were married in states where such marriages are legal.  In Tanco v. Haslam, (MD TN, March 14, 2014), the court said in part:

Currently, all relevant federal authority indicates that the plaintiffs in this case are indeed likely to prevail on their claims that the Anti-Recognition Laws are unconstitutional. That said, by the time that this court is asked to render a final judgment, it may be that other federal courts will have reached a different interpretation that favors the defendants’ position. By the same token, it may be that federal courts will continue uniformly to strike down anti-recognition laws, state same-sex marriage bans, and other laws that discriminate based on sexual orientation. The impact of future decisions, which are forthcoming as the result of continuing litigation in other federal trial and appellate courts across the country, will inevitably influence the ultimate disposition of this case.

Consent Decree Bars Louisiana School District's Promotion of Religion

The ACLU announced on Friday the entry of a consent decree (full text) in Lane v. Sabine Parish School Board, (WD LA, March 14, 2014), enjoining the blatant promotion of Christianity (and harassment of a Buddhist student) that had been taking place in the Negreet, Louisiana schools. (See prior posting.) The detailed 11-page decree decree enjoins school officials from promoting prayer at school events, funding or sponsoring religious services, holding school events at religious venues when other locations are available, promoting personal religious beliefs to students in school or at school events, denigrating a particular religious faith or singling a student out for criticism because of his or her religious beliefs. It also puts strict limits on the distribution of material in schools by outside groups.

White House Blog Notes Tonight's Start of Purim

Tonight is the start of the Jewish holiday of Purim.  A blog post from the White House Office of Public Engagement yesterday notes this by summarizing the story of Purim, and adding that "Purim’s more serious underlying themes of persecution and survival in the face of the planned genocide of ancient Persia’s Jews" still resonates.  Much of the post though is devoted to recipes for the traditional Purim pastry, hamantaschen.

Suit Claims Disorientation From Religious Fast Treated As Mental Illness

Courthouse News Service reports this week on a lawsuit filed in Common Pleas Court in Cleveland, Ohio by a Pentecostal Christian "self-published spiritual author" who claims she was involuntarily committed to a hospital psychiatric ward when she became confused and disoriented on the 15th day of a "Biblical fast." She has sued the hospital and a doctor, claiming that he and the hospital staff "characterized [her] religious devotion as evidence of mental instability, making repeated references to her 'religious preoccupation' and noting [her] Bible reading and audible praying as evidence [of] mental illness." She seeks punitive damages for false arrest and violation of patient rights. The case is Doe v. St. Vincent Charity Medical Center, (filed 3/10/2014).

New High-Budget Noah Movie Banned By Islamic Censors In 3 Countries

WebProNews reports today that censors in Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates have banned the showing in their countries of the new Paramount Pictures high-budget movie "Noah." Also Egypt's Al-Azhar has issued a fatwa against the film.  A spokesman from the UAE’s National Media Center says that the film portrays holy figures in art in contravention of Muslim religious beliefs. Censors also say that the film may offend viewers because some of scenes contradict Islamic teachings.

Boehner, Pelosi Invite Pope To Address Joint Session of Congress

As Pope Francis marks his first anniversary as Pontiff, House Speaker John Boehner announced yesterday that he has extended an open invitation to Pope Francis to address a joint meeting of the U.S. Congress, saying in part:

His tireless call for the protection of the most vulnerable among us—the ailing, the disadvantaged, the unemployed, the impoverished, the unborn—has awakened hearts on every continent....

Many in the United States ... have embraced Pope Francis’ reminder that we cannot meet our responsibility to the poor with a welfare mentality based on business calculations.  We can meet it only with personal charity on the one hand and sound, inclusive policies on the other.

The Holy Father’s pastoral message challenges people of all faiths, ideologies and political parties.  His address as a visiting head of state before a joint meeting of the House and Senate would honor our nation in keeping with the best traditions of our democratic institutions.  It would also offer an excellent opportunity for the American people as well as the nations of the world to hear his message in full.

Time reports that House minority leader Nancy Pelosi issued a statement joining in the invitation.

Suit Seeks Florida Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages

In Florida on Wednesday, eight same-sex couples who were married in other states filed a federal lawsuit seeking to require Florida to recognize their marriages. The complaint (full text) in Grimsley and Albu v. Scott, (ND FL, filed 3/12/2014) contends that the refusal to do so violates the due process and equal protection clauses. ACLU announced the filing of the lawsuit. A state court lawsuit seeking to require Florida to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples is already pending. (See prior posting.)

Air Force Academy Controversy Over Cadets Posting Bible Verses

The U.S. Air Force Academy which is no stranger to church-state controversies is now in the midst of one over whether cadets may post Bible verses on the whiteboard each cadet has on his room door.  As reported yesterday by Fox News, the controversy began after a cadet leader posted a verse from Galatians on his dorm room door and another cadet contacted the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.  When MRFF's head complained, the Bible verse was erased.  A dozen other students, though, upset by the removal of the verse began to post other Bible verses-- and some from the Qur'an-- on their own doors. The Academy did not require these to be removed because the students involved are not cadet leaders. meanwhile a coalition of religious advocacy groups has offered assistance to any cadet sanctioned for posting Bible verses on his door.

India's Supreme Court Says Lack of Enforcement of Existing Laws Is At Root of Hate Speech Problem

In Sangathan v. Union of India, (India Sup. Ct., March 12, 2014), a 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India refused to issue specific orders for authorities to take action against hate speech by political and religious leaders. Among the requests in the Public Interest Lawsuit was for the court to order suspension of legislators who engage in hate speech and de-recognition of their political parties. However the court concluded that current laws already provide sufficient remedies against hate speech:

The root of the problem is not the absence of laws but rather a lack of their effective execution. Therefore, the executive as well as civil society has to perform its role in enforcing the already exiting legal regime.

The court encouraged the Law Commission to consider defining "hate speech" and make recommendations to Parliament for it to strengthen the Election Commission's powers to curb hate speech. Outlook India reports on the decision.

Georgia Legislature Authorizes Ten Commandments Monument On State Capitol Grounds

According to WSB-TV News, the Georgia State Senate yesterday gave final passage and sent to the governor for his signature HB 702 which authorizes placing within the capitol building or on the statehouse grounds a "historic granite monument" depicting the Preamble to the Georgia Constitution, a line from the Declaration of Independence, and the Ten Commandments. The monument is to be funded only by private contributions.  The bill passed the House last week by a vote of 138-37.  It passed the Senate yesterday by a vote of 40-10.

Montana Supreme Court Rules On Lutheran Church Property Dispute

In New Hope Lutheran Ministry v. Faith Lutheran Church of Great Falls, Inc., (MT Sup. Ct., March  12, 2014), the Montana Supreme Court held that members of a Lutheran congregation-- Faith Lutheran Church-- that voted to break away from the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America over ELCA's policy of ordaining gays and lesbians are not entitled to the church's property. The break-away members voted to affiliate instead with Lutheran Congregations in Mission for Christ. Under Faith Lutheran's constitution, while a 2/3 vote would authorize disaffiliation, a 90% vote was needed before title to the church's property would go to the break-away congregation. Only 71% of members voted to disaffiliate. The court said:

we conclude that a dispute over church documents susceptible to application of neutral principles may ... be resolved by a court using the neutral approach. The challenge raised here by Faith Lutheran to the validity of the 1993 constitution does not require us to delve into doctrinal matters, and only separate, secular language is used. Resolution is possible under application of neutral principles of contract, trust, and corporate law. Thus, no First Amendment concern is raised that would prohibit a court’s exercise of jurisdiction over the dispute.....

Finding that the church's 1993 constitution was valid, the court held that the congregation's property belongs to New Hope Lutheran Ministry-- the group that remains loyal to ELCA. However the court concluded that funds held by a Foundation that was created to support Faith Lutheran Church belong to the break-away congregation. The Montana Supreme Court also published a Synopsis of the Case.  Great Falls Tribune reports on the decision.

Group Seeks Ecclesiastical Proceedings Against Episcopal Bishop For Her Civil Lawsuits Against Break-Away Parishes

Virtue Online reported yesterday that the American Anglican Fellowship (AAF), a group of current and former members of The Episcopal Church (TEC), filed a formal complaint last December with TEC's Intake Officer seeking to invoke formal ecclesiastical proceedings against Presiding Bishop Katherine Jefferts Schori because of the litigation in civil courts that she has undertaken against break-away parishes. AAF claims:

The litigation authorized by the Presiding Bishop and various bishops asks courts to interpret provisions of the Constitution and Canons. The litigation thus violates Canon IV.19.2, which provides that "No member of the Church, whether lay or ordained, may seek to have the Constitution and Canons interpreted by a secular court, or resort to a secular court to address a dispute arising under the Constitution and Canons, or for any purpose of delay, hindrance, review or otherwise affecting any proceeding under this Title." 

The litigation further violates Canon IV.4.1(e), which requires the Presiding Bishop and various bishops, as members of the Clergy, to "safeguard the property and funds of the Church and Community." The expense for litigation is a violation of the canon since other solutions with substantially less cost have been used in the past and today by TEC as well as the Presbyterian and Lutheran Churches. 

For failure to safeguard the property and funds of the Church, the Presiding Bishop "shall be accountable" (Canon IV.4.2).

The AAF complaint says: "We framed this document in a caring and loving way ... not to discipline, but to achieve an Accord of conciliation as Christ would have us do, to bring an end to this madness of Christians suing Christians," AAF has not yet received a formal response from TEC to its complaint.