British Lottery Approves Grants To Deal with Bats In Churches

With the U.S. Supreme Court still scheduled this term to hear the Trinity Lutheran case on government grants to religious institutions, this story from Britain presents an interesting comparative law example.  Britain's Heritage Lottery Fund distributes a share of the income from the National Lottery to projects for preserving and making accessible Britain's heritage. Yesterday the Fund announced a large 5-year grant for a "Bats In Churches" project, explaining in part:

The UK has internationally important populations of bats which are at risk due to decreases in precious woodland habitats. Churches offer alternative sanctuaries for maternity roosts and hibernation. However, bats in churches can cause serious problems as bat droppings can restrict activities, damage historic artifacts and put a strain on the volunteers who look after the buildings.

Thanks to input from skilled professionals who will work with volunteers, solutions to these problems will be shared with hundreds of churches.

[Thanks to Law & Religion UK for the lead.]

Supreme Court Says Maine Cannot Exclude Sectarian Schools From Its Tuition Reimbursement Program

In Carson v. Makin, (Sup. Ct., June 21, 2022), in a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Maine's program that pays tuition (up to a statutory limit) to out-of-district public or private high schools for students whose districts do not operate a high school, but which requires participating schools to be nonsectarian, violates the Free Exercise Clause. The majority opinion by Chief Justice Roberts says in part:

The State pays tuition for certain students at private schools— so long as the schools are not religious. That is discrimination against religion. A State’s antiestablishment interest does not justify enactments that exclude some members of the community from an otherwise generally available public benefit because of their religious exercise....

Maine’s “nonsectarian” requirement for its otherwise generally available tuition assistance payments violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. Regardless of how the benefit and restriction are described, the program operates to identify and exclude otherwise eligible schools on the basis of their religious exercise.

Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Kagan and for the most part by Justice Sotomayor, filed a dissenting opinion which says in part:

Nothing in our Free Exercise Clause cases compels Maine to give tuition aid to private schools that will use the funds to provide a religious education.... [T]his Court’s decisions in Trinity Lutheran and Espinoza prohibit States from denying aid to religious schools solely because of a school’s religious status—that is, its affiliation with or control by a religious organization.... But we have never said that the Free Exercise Clause prohibits States from withholding funds because of the religious use to which the money will be put....

Maine’s decision not to fund such schools falls squarely within the play in the joints between those two Clauses. Maine has promised all children within the State the right to receive a free public education. In fulfilling this promise, Maine endeavors to provide children the religiously neutral education required in public school systems.... The Religion Clauses give Maine the ability, and flexibility, to make this choice. 

Justice Sotomayor also filed a dissenting opinion which says in part:

This Court continues to dismantle the wall of separation between church and state that the Framers fought to build.... 

If a State cannot offer subsidies to its citizens without being required to fund religious exercise, any State that values its historic antiestablishment interests more than this Court does will have to curtail the support it offers to its citizens.

CNN reports on the decision.

DOE Will Not Enforce Ban On Religious Organizations As Contractors For "Equitable Services" Under Federal Grants

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act requires local educational agencies to include private schools in their federally funded programs to provide supplemental educational services to provide equitable, high-quality education for students from low-income families. School districts may contract with outside providers for various educational services, however under ESSA, the provider must be independent of any religious organization.  In a press release yesterday, the U.S. Department of Education announced that this restriction would no longer be enforced, saying in part:

The U.S. Department of Education, in consultation with the U.S. Department of Justice, determined the statutory provisions in Section 1117(d)(2)(B) and 8501(d)(2)(B) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) that require an equitable services provider to “be independent of … any religious organization” are unconstitutional because they categorically exclude religious organizations based solely on their religious identity.

These provisions run counter to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, 137 S. Ct. 2012 (2017) that, under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, otherwise eligible recipients cannot be disqualified from a public benefit solely because of their religious character.

The Department will, however, continue to enforce the statutory requirement that the outside services being provided are "secular, neutral and non-ideological."

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Christopher C. Lund, Religious Exemptions, Third-Party Harms, and the False Analogy to Church Taxes, (Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 106, p. 679, 2018 (symposium)).
• Petro Kurmaiev, Prostitution: The Essence and Motives, (July 23, 2018).
• Samuel Wolfe Calhoun, If Separation of Church and State Doesn’t Demand Separating Religion from Politics, Does Christian Doctrine Require It?, (74 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. Online 565 (2019)).
• Siraj Khan, Arab and Islamic States’ Practice: The Sharíʿah Clause and Its Effects on the Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, (in Tallyn Gray (editor), Islam and International Criminal Law and Justice, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, Brussels, 2018).

From SmartCILP:

• Richard D. Komer, Trinity Lutheran and the Future of Educational Choice: Implications for State Blaine Amendments, 44 Mitchell Hamline Law Review 551-613 (2018).

Recent Articles of Interest

 From SSRN:

• Saud M. Alholiby & Zakaria A. Almulhim, From the Lack to the Requirement: The Public Consultation Reform in Saudi Arabia,  (UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law, Forthcoming).
• Mark Movsesian, Law, Religion, and the COVID Crisis, (Journal of Law and Religion, Forthcoming).
• Scott W. Gaylord, Roe as Potemkin Village: Fallacies, Facades, and Stare Decisis (September 17, 2021).
• Jean-Francois Achille, 'Unnecessary Cruelty': Freedom of Religion and the Humane Slaughter Act (May 15, 2021).
• David R. Stras, What My Grandparents’ Experiences in the Holocaust Taught Me About the First Amendment, (NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, Forthcoming).
• Moorthy S. Muthuswamy, Does Sharia Act as both a Mediator and Moderator in Salafi Radicalism?, (August 29, 2021).

New Journal

• The Inaugural Issue of the Australian Journal of Law & Religion is now being developed.

From SmartCILP:

• Richard S. Myers, The Significance of Trinity Lutheran, 17 Ave Maria Law Review 1-17 (2019).
• John C. Eastman, "Religiously Scrupulous"': Freedom of Conscience at the Founding, 17 Ave Maria Law Review 18-34 (2019).
• Massimo Campanini & Mohamed 'Arafa, Islam and Democracy: Appreciating the Nuance and Complexity of Legal Systems with a Basis in Religion, 26 Barry Law Review 1-30 (2020).
• Volume 5, Buddhism Law & Society (2019-20).

New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds Textbook Loan Program

In Moses v. Ruszkowski, (NM Sup. Ct., Dec. 13, 2018), the New Mexico Supreme Court in a 5-2 decision held that New Mexico's textbook loan program does not violate the state constitution. The program provides for the loan of secular textbooks to private and parochial school students.  In 2015, the state Supreme Court held that the program was unconstitutional. (See prior posting.) However in 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court  granted certiorari, vacated the judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's Trinity Lutheran Church decision. (See prior posting.) Now on remand, the state Supreme Court reversed itself, saying in part:

On remand, we conclude that this Court’s previous interpretation of Article 16 XII, Section 3 raises concerns under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. To avoid constitutional concerns, we hold that the textbook loan program, which provides a generally available public benefit to students, does not result in the use of public funds in support of private schools as prohibited by Article XII, Section 3. We also hold that the textbook loan program is consistent with Article IV, Section 31 of the New Mexico Constitution, which addresses appropriations for educational purposes, and Article IX, Section 14 of the New Mexico Constitution, which limits “any donation to or in aid of any person, association or public or private corporation.”

Chief Justice Nakamura and Justice Clingman dissented. Courthouse News Service reports on the decision.

1st Circuit Upholds Maine's Exclusion of Sectarian Schools From Tuition Reimbursement

In Carson v. Makin, (1st Cir., Oct. 29, 2020), the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Maine's statutory provisions that pay tuition to out-of-district public or private high schools for students whose districts do not operate a high school. However, to qualify to receive tuition assistance payments, a private school must be non-sectarian. Plaintiffs challenge this, particularly in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's Trinity Lutheran and Espinoza decisions. The court distinguished Supreme Court precedent as follows:

Accordingly, we proceed on the understanding that this restriction, unlike the one at issue in Espinoza, does not bar schools from receiving funding simply based on their religious identity -- a status that in and of itself does not determine how a school would use the funds that it receives to provide educational instruction.... Instead, we understand this restriction to bar BCS and TA from receiving the funding based on the religious use that they would make of it in instructing children in the tuition assistance program....

The difficulty Maine confronts is that many of its localities cannot feasibly provide the benefits of that free public education directly to their residents. Thus, Maine has had to adapt to that reality. In doing so, it has chosen to provide -- while still ensuring that any parent in Maine may send their child to a religious school at their own expense -- tuition assistance for those children who live in localities that operate no public secondary school of their own to attend a private school that will provide a substitute for what they cannot get from the government. 

In conditioning the availability of that assistance on the requirement that recipients use it for educational instruction that is as nonsectarian in content as the free public education that is not directly available to them, Maine transgresses neither the Free Exercise Clause nor the Establishment Clause, nor any of the other provisions of the federal Constitution that the plaintiffs invoke.

Courthouse News Service reports on the decision.

Happy New Year 2017 !

Dear Religion Clause Readers:

Happy New Year 2017! I hope you continue to find Religion Clause a useful, if not indispensable, source of news on religious liberty and church-state developments.  While I focus primarily on developments in the United States, I have increased my coverage of international law-and-religion issues that are of special interest.

In a year in which distrust of media outlets and concerns over "fake" news reports have gained prominence, I hope I have remained reliably objective in my posts and have provided links to an abundance of primary source material for your use in fleshing out your understanding of developments.  I am pleased that my regular readers span the political and religious spectrum and include a large number of law school faculty, journalists, clergy, governmental agency personnel, and others working professionally dealing with church-state relations and religious liberty concerns.

Last year was a year of surprises-- not the least of which were the untimely death of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States.  Both of these will significantly impact church-state and religious liberty developments in 2017.

The aphorism "Predictions are very difficult, particularly if they are about the future" has variously been ascribed to Neils Bohr, Yogi Berra and others.  Well here is my difficult, and some might say foolhardy, prediction for 2017.  The year has the potential of bringing seismic developments in the church-state and religious liberty arenas.  There are three areas to watch.

First, religious liberty claims are increasingly seen as part of the "culture wars"-- a religious, social and political divide that became more salient with the election of Donald Trump.  A fundamental issue that is likely to pervade a number of specific disputes this year is how to distinguish a "religious" claim that enjoys special legal protection from a cultural claim that is subject to the will of political majorities.

Second, the added wall of separation provided by Blaine Amendments in numerous state constitutions is under challenge in the Supreme Court in the Trinity Lutheran case.  This challenge coincides with Donald Trump's designation as Secretary of Education of an individual who is a vigorous proponent of school choice.  In recent years, Blaine Amendments have been a primary stumbling block for school vouchers and similar plans.

Third, during the campaign, Donald Trump promised evangelical audiences that repeal of the Johnson Amendment was high on his agenda.  Repeal would mean that houses of worship could actively participate in political campaigns and still keep their non-profit status.  The revolution in campaign financing resulting from on-line fundraising from millions of supporters that was finely tuned in the 2016 elections could be supplemented by the raising of what would effectively be tax-deductible campaign funds to finance electioneering by religious organizations.

Continue to read Religion Clause to find out if developments bear out any of my speculative suggestions.  I also remind you that the Religion Clause sidebar contains links to a wealth of resources.  Please e-mail me if you discover broken links or if there are other links that I should consider adding.

Thanks to all of you who are loyal readers-- both those who have followed Religion Clause for years and those of you who have only recently discovered the blog.  Thank you for making Religion Clause the most recognized source for keeping informed on the intersection of religion with law and politics.  I encourage you to recommend Religion Clause to colleagues and friends who might find it of interest.  It is accessible via Twitter and Facebook, as well as through traditional online access and RSS feeds.

Best wishes for 2017!  Feel free to contact me by e-mail (religionclause@gmail.com) in response to this post or throughout the year.

Howard M. Friedman

Some Issues of Religion In Tomorrow's Down-Ballot Contests

Religion has not dominated very many down-ballot contests in tomorrow's election.  However for those interested in religious liberty and church-state issues, there are several contests to watch. [Thanks to Don Byrd at Blog From the Capital for keeping an eye on these down ballot issues.]

1. Oklahoma State Question 790 asks voters to repeal provisions in Oklahoma's state constitution (Art. 2, Sec. 5) that prohibits the use of public funds or property for the direct or indirect benefit of any religion or religious institution.  This section of the state constitution was the basis for the Oklahoma Supreme Court to order removal of a Ten Commandments monument.
   
2. Missouri Constitutional Amendment 3 would increase the tax on cigarettes to create an Early Childhood Health and Education Trust Fund that will make grants to both public and private entities.  Part of the amendment excludes grant funds distributed from the Trust Fund from the restrictions of Missouri Constitution Art. IX, Sec. 8 which prohibits use of public funds to support any religious creed, sectarian purpose or religious educational institution. The proposed Amendment also bars use of trust funds for any abortion services not necessary to save the life of the mother.
   
3. The conservative Christian religious beliefs of one of the candidates for Justice of the Montana Supreme Court-- attorney and law professor Kristen Juras-- has become a campaign issue. (See prior posting.)
   
4. In a contest for state legislature in Ohio, Casey Weinstein who is running in House District 37 (Summit County), has been challenged over a lawsuit filed on his behalf when he was an Air Force Academy cadet. According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, an ad sent out by state Republican Party focuses on a lawsuit in which Weinstein was one of the plaintiffs objecting to alleged Christian proselytizing at the Air Force Academy. Weinstein's father Mikey Weinstein is head of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation that filed the suit.
   
5. The result of the state Attorney General contest in Missouri may impact a major free exercise case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court-- Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley. At issue is the denial-- because of Missouri's Blaine Amendment-- of a state Playground Scrap Tire Surface Material Grant that would have allowed a church to resurface a playground at its day care and preschool facility. The state, represented by the current Democratic state Attorney General Chris Koster (who is now a candidate for governor), is defending the denial. However Republican Attorney General candidate Josh Hawley sides with the church and filed an amicus brief in support of of it on behalf of a Pentecostal Christian denomination. (US Law Week, Nov. 2, reports).

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Steven Douglas Smith, Why School Prayer Matters, (San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 20-447 (2020)).
• Robin S. Maril, The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Trinity Lutheran, and Trumpism: Codifying Fiction with Administrative Gaslighting, (Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2020).
• Stephanie H. Barclay, The Historical Origins of Judicial Religious Exemptions, (Notre Dame Law Review (forthcoming 2020)).
• Greer Donley, Beatrice Chen & Sonya Borrero, The Legal and Medical Necessity of Abortion Care Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic, (Journal of Law & the Biosciences, Forthcoming).
• Tifani Silveria, Whole Woman's Health: Not the 'Whole' Story, (Regent University Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2019).
• Nancy J. Knauer, The LGBT Equality Gap and Federalism, (American University Law Review, Vol. 70, No. 1, 2020).
• David S. Miller, et al, The FFCRA and CARES Act: Key Provisions Affecting Nonprofit Organizations (April 23, 2020).
• Philip Hackney, Political Justice and Tax Policy: The Social Welfare Organization Case, (Texas A&M Law Review, Vol. 8, 2021, Forthcoming).

From SSRN (International and Non-U.S. Law):

• Ioana Cismas & Ezequiel Heffes, Not the Usual Suspects: Religious Leaders as Influencers of International Humanitarian Law Compliance, (Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law Vol. 22: 70 Years Geneva Conventions: Past, Present and Future (2020 Forthcoming)).
• Giancarlo Anello, Homo Religiosus in a Globalized World: How Religious Individuals are Actors of Global Law, (April 4, 2020).
• Margaret Muga & Joshua Malidzo Nyawa, Judicial Protection of the Minority Religious Beliefs: A Commentary on the Rastafarian and Mohammed Fugicha (Hijab) Judgments, (March 28, 2020).
• Shaikh Ahmad, Review on Triple Talaq Within the Islamic Legislations, (March 28, 2020).
• Shaikh Ahmad, Muslim Women's Rights Regarding Marriage and Divorce In the Context of the Islam Religion, (March 31, 2020).
• Shaikh Ahmad, Analysis of the Triple-Talaq Within the Framework of Judiciary in India With Reforms of Sharia Law, (April 2, 2020).

From SmartCILP:

• Shams Al Din Al Hajjaji, A Tale of Two Theories: Government By Judiciary Theory versus Guardianship of the Jurist Theory, 33 Emory International Law Review 503-533 (2019).

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Aziz Z. Huq, Judging Discriminatory Intent, (Cornell Law Review, Vol. 103 (2017)).
• William E. Thro & Charles J. Russo, Odious to the Constitution: The Educational Implications of Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, (Education Law Reporter (2017, Forthcoming)).
• Elizabeth Brown & Inara K. Scott, Sanctuary Corporations: Should Liberal Corporations Get Religion?, (August 18, 2017).
• Erdem Büyüksagis, The Role of Comparative Law: New International Model Rules vs. Time-Tested Local Practices, (North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2017).
• Ori Aronson, The How Many Question: An Institutionalist's Guide to Pluralism, (Institutionalizing Rights and Religion: Competing Supremacies 147-163 (Leora Batnitzky & Hanoch Dagan eds., Cambridge University Press, 2017).
• Scott D. Gerber, Law and Catholicism in Colonial Maryland, (103 Catholic Historical Review 465 (2017)).
• Reva Siegel, ProChoiceLife: Asking Who Protects Life and How—And Why It Matters in Law and Politics, (Indiana Law Journal, Forthcoming).
• Virginia La Torre Jeker, When Sharia and U.S. Tax Law Collide, (Tax Notes International, Volume 87, No. 8, August 21, 2017).
• David Herzig & Samuel D. Brunson, Let Prophets Be (Non) Profits, (Wake Forest Law Review, Forthcoming).

Vermont Supreme Court: Grant For Church Repairs Is Likely OK

In Taylor v. Town of Cabot, (VT Sup. Ct., Oct. 6, 2017), the Vermont Supreme Court vacated a preliminary injunction that a trial court had issued to block a municipal grant to a historic church for repairs to its building.  The grant came from funds that originated with the federal government but now belonged to the town to use consistent with federal regulations. The court held that plaintiffs have municipal taxpayer standing to challenge the grant under the state constitution's prohibition on compelled support of any place of worship (Chapter I, Article Three). In remanding the case for further proceedings, the court said in part:

The fact that the ultimate recipient of these funds is a church does not itself establish a violation of the Compelled Support Clause; the critical question is whether the funds will support worship. Chittenden Town Sch. Dist., 169 Vt. at 325, 738 A.2d at 550. In fact, denying the UCC secular benefits available to other like organizations might raise concerns under the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution. To meet these concerns, plaintiffs will have to demonstrate that painting the church building and assessing its sills is more like funding devotional training for future clergy, as in Locke, than paying for a new playground surface on church property, as in Trinity Lutheran. Specified repairs to the church building itself admittedly fall somewhere between these two poles. In making their case, plaintiffs must persuade the court either that the Compelled Support Clause categorically precludes the use of public funds to pay for any repairs to a building that serves as a place of worship, without regard to the breadth and neutrality of the program pursuant to which the funding is provided, or that the specific repairs funded under this grant are prohibited. The first proposition is legally questionable; the second is not supported by the record.

Religious Pre-School's Exclusion From State Grant Program Required By State Constitution

In Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Pauley, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147674 (WD MO, Sept. 26, 2013),  a Missouri federal district court upheld the policy of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources Solid Waste Management Program to exclude from its Scrap Tire Program any organization controlled by a church or by a religious sect or denomination. Thus plaintiff's religiously-affiliated day care and preschool facility could not apply for a grant under the program to buy recycled tires to resurface its playground. First the court concluded that providing a grant through the Scrap Tire Program would violate Art. I, Sec. 7 of the Missouri constitution that prohibits the expenditure of any public funds to aid a church or religious denomination.  The court then rejected arguments that the ban violated plaintiff's free exercise, establishment clause, free speech and equal protection rights under the U.S. Constitution.

Recent Articles and Book of Interest

From SSRN:

• Jeremy Patrick, 'A La Carte' Spirituality and the Future of Freedom of Religion, (January 31, 2018).
• Rafael Domingo, Penal Law in the Roman Catholic Church, (Ecclesiastical Law Journal 20 (2018), Forthcoming).
• Nelson Tebbe, Conscience and Equality, (Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development (2018 Forthcoming)).
• Andrew P. Cicero, III, Is It Well with Your Soul? The Surprising Divide within the Baptist Community Concerning Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, (February 1, 2018).
• Ryan T. Anderson, Marriage, the Court, and the Future, (Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2017).
• Courtney G. Joslin, Discrimination In and Out of Marriage, (98 Boston University Law Review 1 (2018)).
• Emily Warwick, Title IX, Tax-Exemption, and Transgender Students: Using Federal Guidelines to Determine the Tax-Exempt Status of Single-Sex Institutions, (January 31, 2018).

From SSRN (Law of charities):

• Natalie Silver, Regulating the Foreign Activities of Charities: A Comparative Perspective, (Report for the Pemsel Case Foundation, 2017).
• Brian D. Galle, Design and Implementation of a Charitable Regulation Regime, (January 28, 2018).
• Paul B. Miller, The Identification of Fiduciary Relationships, (Evan J. Criddle, Paul B. Miller, and Robert H. Sitkoff, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018)).

From SSRN (European law):

• Evina Heydari, A Post-Secular Europe? – A Critical Discourse Analysis of European Rulings Regarding Religious Symbols in the Public Sphere, (November 18, 2017).
• Natalie Alkiviadou, Regulating Hate Speech in the EU, (Online Hate Speech in the European Union. A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Springer briefs in Linguistics (2017)).

From SSRN (Islam and Islamic Law):

• Fajri Muhammadin, Should Muslims Argue Exceptionalism/Particularism in International Law?, (February 8, 2018).
• Marco Longobardo, The Self-Proclaimed Statehood of the Islamic State between 2014 and 2017 and International Law, ((2017) 33 Anuario español de derecho internacional 205-228).
• Ending Solehudin, The System Zakat Reform of Management and the Zakat in Indonesia (A Study of the Fatwa of Islamic Organization Persis and MUI on the Management of Zakat), (International Journal of Financial Management (IJFM), Vol. 7, Issue 1, Dec – Jan 2018, 1-20).
• Reza Banakar, Double-Thinking and Contradictory Arrangements in Iranian Law and Society, (Digest of Middle East Studies, Forthcoming).

From SmartCILP:

• Douglas Laycock, Churches, Playgrounds, Government Dollars -- and Schools? 131 Harvard Law Review 133-169 (2017).
• Stacey A. Tovino, On Health, Law, and Religion, 74 Washington & Lee Law Review 1623-1691 (2017).

Recent Book:

• Monroe Price & Nicole Stremlau (eds.), Speech and Society in Turbulent Times: Freedom of Expression in Comparative Perspective, (Cambridge Univ. Press, Dec. 2017).

2nd Circuit: Vermont Town Tuition Program Cannot Exclude Parochial Schools

 In A.H. v. French, (2d Cir., June 2, 2021), the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals filed its opinion explaining its Feb. 3, 2021 Order granting a petition for a writ of mandamus.  At issue was Vermont's refusal to allow students attending religious schools to participate in the state's Town Tuition Program. School districts that do not operate their own high schools must pay tuition costs for students in their district to attend another public high school or an approved non-religious private high school. The Second Circuit held that the exclusion of religious high schools from the program violates the First Amendment, saying in part:

Four years ago, the Supreme Court reminded states that it “has repeatedly confirmed that denying a generally available benefit solely on account of religious identity imposes a penalty on the free exercise of religion that can be justified only by a state interest of the highest order.” Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer.... Last June, the Court clarified that this rule does not allow a state to apply a state constitutional prohibition on aid to religion that would “bar[] religious schools from public benefits solely because of the religious character of the schools.” Espinoza v. Mont. Dep't of Revenue.... The Court emphasized that “[s]tatus-based discrimination remains status based even if one of its goals or effects is preventing religious organizations from putting aid to religious uses”....

Judge Menashi filed a concurring opinion.

Top Ten Religious Liberty and Church-State Developments of 2016

Each year in December, I attempt to pick the most important church-state and religious liberty developments of the past year.  This was a busy year, and a number of the important developments amounted to themes that spanned many months.  So here are my Top Ten picks for the rather chaotic year that is currently coming to an end. I welcome e-mail comment from those who disagree with my choices.

1. The unexpected death of Justice Scalia leaves the Supreme Court split on important issues, including the challenges to the Obamacare contraceptive coverage mandate.

2. Religion plays unusual roles in the Presidential election contest.  Donald Trump raises issues of Muslim immigration, repeal of the Johnson amendment, draws support from Evangelicals despite a personal history that might raise questions with religious conservatives, and receives support from the alt-Right which includes anti-Semitic elements.  Hillary Clinton who has deep personal religious roots does not emphasize these in her campaign.

3. Transgender rights-- particularly access to bathrooms-- become a religious as well as political issue as the Obama administration asserts that existing anti-discrimination provisions in federal law cover discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

4. Supreme Court grants review in ERISA "church plan" exemption cases.  Billions of dollars in potential underfunding of retirement plans by religiously-affiliated health care systems around the country are at issue.

5. Fallout from the legalization of same-sex marriage continues as various wedding service providers assert the right to refuse to serve same-sex couples, Mississippi's Conscience Protection Act is struck down, and Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore appeals his suspension growing of his resistance to accepting the Supreme Court's marriage equality ruling.

6. Latin crosses as part of veterans' memorials, in parks, and on county seals and the like become the latest focus of the battle over religious displays on public property.

7. State "Blaine Amendments" again become the focus of attention as the Supreme Court grants review in the Trinity Lutheran Church case and Oklahoma voters defeat a proposal to eliminate Blaine Amendments from the state constitution.

8. Federal and state RFRA's continue to be asserted, often but not always unsuccessfully, in unusual contexts-- e.g. challenging "In God We Trust" on currency, as a defense to tax evasion charges, as a defense to food stamp fraud, in connection with bankruptcy discharges, and in treatment of transgender employees.

9. Congress expands the U.S. role in protecting international religious freedom by passing the Frank R. Wolf International Religious Freedom Act.

10.  Justice Department sues cities under Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act for placing zoning impediments in the way of mosque construction.

For an alternative view of the Top Ten Religious Liberty Stories of 2016, see this post by Baptist Joint Committee blogger Don Byrd.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Ira C. Lupu & Robert W. Tuttle, Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer: Paradigm Lost?, (Forthcoming, American Constitution Society for Law & Policy Supreme Court Review, October Term 2016).
• Meghan Boone, The Autonomy Hierarchy, (Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2016).
• Julio C. Colón, Improving Dispute Resolution for Muslims in the United States, (International Conference on Dispute Resolution 2017: Modern Trends in Effective Dispute Resolution, International Islamic University of Malaysia (2017)).
• Nicholas Aroney, Individual, Community and State: Thoughts on Jane Norton, Freedom of Religious Organizations, (July 17, 2017).
• Adam Perry, Pardons and Mercy, (July 30, 2017).
• Robert L. Tsai, Obama's Conversion on Same-Sex Marriage: The Social Foundations of Individual Rights, (Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 50, 2017).

From SSRN (International and Comparative Law):

• Jaclyn L. Neo, Realizing the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion: The Limited Normative Force of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration, (Human Rights Law Review (2017, Forthcoming)).
• Jaclyn L. Neo, Secularism Without Liberalism: Religious Freedom and Secularism in a Non-Liberal State, (Michigan State Law Review, 2017).
• John Lunstroth, Human Rights and Cultural Diversity in UNESCO Bioethics, (in Advancing Global Bioethics, Vol. 6: Religious Perspectives on Bioethics and Human Rights (Tham, Joseph, Man Kwan, Kai, Garcia, Alberto (Eds.) 2017, Springer Nature, New York, Forthcoming).

From SSRN (Jewish Law):

• Raphael Cohen-Almagor, The Monopoly of Jewish Orthodoxy in Israel and Its Effects on the Governance of Religious Diversity, (in Anna Triandafyllidou and Tariq Modood (eds.), The Problem of Religious Diversity (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017), pp. 250-272).
• Levi Cooper, Mysteries of the Paratext: Why Did Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liady Never Publish His Code of Law?, (Diné Israel 31 (2017): 43-84).

Down-Ballot Results of Interest

In a pre-election post I identified several down-ballot contests that were of interest to those following religious issues. Here are the results from yesterday in those contests:

1. Oklahoma Question 790 that would have amended the state constitution to eliminate the ban on use of public funds to support religious institutions was defeated-- 43% yes and 57% no.
2. Missouri Constitutional Amendment 3 that would have imposed a cigarette tax to fund early childhood initiatives and would have exempted grants in the program from the ban on use of funds to support religious entities was defeated 59% to 41%.
3. Montana Supreme Court candidate Kristen Juras whose conservative Christian religious beliefs became a campaign issue was defeated 56% to 44%.
4. Ohio District 37 state legislature candidate Casey Weinstein sho had been a plaintiff in a suit against the U.S. Air Force Academy alleging Christian proselytizing lost 57% to 43%.
5. In Missouri, Republican Attorney General candidate Josh Hawley who disagrees with the state's position in the Trinity Lutheran case now before the U.S. Supreme Court in which the state denied a playground grant to a church on state constitutional grounds won 59% to 41%.

Top Church-State and Religious Liberty Developments of 2017

Each year in December, I attempt to pick the most important church-state and religious liberty developments of the past year-- including developments internationally in the mix.  Usually I select the top ten, but this year I have expanded it to 11. The selection obviously involves a good deal of subjective judgment, and I welcome e-mail comment from those who disagree with my choices.  So here are my Top Eleven picks for the rather chaotic year that is currently coming to an end:

1.  President Trump issues and reissues restrictions on immigration and entry of refugees which are challenged in the courts as "Muslim bans."

2. Supreme Court's Trinity Lutheran Church decision opens the possibility of expanded governmental aid to religious institutions.

3. Christian Evangelicals remain core supporters of Donald Trump.

4. Trump Administration expands religious and moral exemptions from ACA contraceptive coverage mandate; court challenges filed.

5. The Masterpiece Cakeshop case attracts over 90 amicus briefs as it is argued before the Supreme Court.  The Christian baker's refusal to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple becomes a symbol of the cultural clash between ideals of religious freedom and equality, even though arguments focus on free speech issues.

6. Congress fails to repeal the Johnson Amendment, despite promises by President Trump.

7. Transgender discrimination and transgender service in the military remain high profile religious and cultural issues in the courts and in the political arena.

8. The Alt-Right march in Charlottesville reveals resurgence of traditional forms of  anti-Semitism.

9. Supreme Court's decision in Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton saves retirement plans of religiously affiliated health care networks from unanticipated and costly ERISA coverage.

10. In Israel, government's suspension of an agreement with Judaism's Reform and Conservative movements to construct a separate prayer space at the Western Wall for egalitarian prayer opens a rift with a large segment of the American Jewish community.

11. India's Supreme Court invalidates Triple Talaq marriage for Muslims in India.

For top picks by other observers of the legal and religious scene, see Don Byrd's Top Ten Religious Liberty Stories, and  Religion News Association's Top 10 Religion Stories of the Year Poll.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Philip J. Candreva, Playground or Church? Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. Comer, (Public Administration Review, Forthcoming).
• Julie Ringelheim, State Religious Neutrality as a Common European Standards? Reappraising the European Court of Human Rights Approach, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 6, no.1, p. 1-24 (2017)).
• Scott W. Gaylord, Is a Cake Worth a Thousand Words? Masterpiece Cakeshop and the Impact of Antidiscrimination Laws on the Marketplace of Ideas, (Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 85, Forthcoming).
• Mark Strasser, Obergefell's Legacy, (24 Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy 61-88 (2016)).

From SmartCILP:

• Heidi Liu & Caleb C. Wolanek, Applying Strict Scrutiny: An Empirical Analysis of Free Exercise Cases, 78 Montana Law Review 275-312 (2017).
• Symposium, The Teachings of Pope Francis: Toward a Vision of Social Justice and Sustainable Capitalism? (Introduction by Steven W. Bender; articles by Michael Kaufman, Steven A. Ramirez, Nicholas Capaldi, Gilbert Paul Carrasco, Iryna Zaverukha, Russell Powell, Dean Vincent Rougeau, Amelia J. Uelmen). 40 Seattle University Law Review 1167-1415 (2017).
• Rev. John C. Lentz Jr., The Bystander in the Bible, 2017 Utah L. Rev. 661-705.
• Marcia L. McCormick, Religious Privilege to Discriminate as Religious Freedom: From Charitable Choice to Faith Based Initiatives to RFRA and FADA, 56 Washburn Law Journal 229-243 (2017).
• John R. Dorocak, How Might a Church's Tax-Exempt Status (and Other Advantages) Be Revoked Procedurally for Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage or Be Defended Possibly as Free Exercise of Religion?, [Abstract], 53 Willamette Law Review 161-184 (2017).
• Sarah M. Stephens, Freedom From Religion: A Vulnerability Theory Approach to Restricting Conscience Exemptions in Reproductive Healthcare, 29 Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 93-121 (2017).