Mosque Proponents Sue Pennsylvania Township Over Zoning Variance Denial

CAIR-Philadephia announced yesterday that it has filed a federal lawsuit against Bensalem Township, Pennsylvania challenging its refusal to grant a zoning variance to a Muslim congregation, Bensalem Masjid, which seeks to build a mosque on property that it currently leases with an option to purchase. The complaint (full text) in The Bensalem Masjid Inc. v. Bensalem Township, (ED PA, filed 12/8/2014), contends that the Township's zoning ordinances allow houses of worship only in areas zoned Institutional (IN), and that there are no available properties zoned IN that could be used for a mosque. The complaint contends that the Township's zoning ordinances and regulations, and its action refusing a variance, violate RLUIPA, the 1st and 14th Amendments and the state's Religious Freedom Protection Act. Philadelphia Daily News reports on the lawsuit.

Philadelphia Passes Hate Crimes Ordinance

The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that on Thursday Philadelphia City Council unanimously passed Bill No. 140720 (full text) which provides an additional penalty of up to 90 days in jail and a $2000 fine where any of several crimes are motivated by hatred toward the actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender or gender identity, or disability of the victims. It is expected that Mayor Nutter will sign the bill into law.

Settlement Reached In School's Ban of Religious Valentines

Alliance Defending Freedom this week announced a settlement leading to a voluntary dismissal in J.S. v. Nazareth Area School District, (ED PA, Oct. 22, 2014). The suit challenged a Pennsylvania elementary school's refusal to allow a student to hand out Valentine cards containing a religious message. (See prior posting.) In the settlement, the school district has removed language from its policies that prohibited student expression seeking to establish the supremacy of a particular religious view or denomination. The Morning Call reporting on the settlement quotes a school board attorney who says that even under the revised policy the particular Valentine message at issue here may have not been permitted because its discussion of St. Valentine's martyrdom may have been too adult a topic.

Pennsylvania Boy Charged With Desecrating Venerated Object After Facebook Photo of Simulated Sex With Jesus Statue

In Everett, Pennsylvania last week police charged a 14-year old boy with violating Pennsylvania's ban on desecration of venerated objects (18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5509) after he posted photos on Facebook showing him simulating oral sex with a statue of Jesus. According to a Pennsylvania State Police Report, the incident took place in July, and charges were filed in Juvenile Court on Sept. 9. Queerty reports that the statue belongs to the Christian organization Love In the Name of Christ.  An organization spokesman says it does not believe the boy should be prosecuted, and asked instead "for prayer for the young man."

Pennsylvania Diocese Gets Permanent Injunction Against ACA Contraceptive Mandate

In Brandt v. Burwell, (WD PA, Aug. 20, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court issued a permanent injunction under RFRA against requiring the Diocese of Greensburg, Pennsylvania and affiliated organizations to comply with the  compromise rules under the Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage mandate.  In its 53-page opinion, the court said in part:

Here, the issue is whether Plaintiffs, being non-secular in nature, have successfully proven that their right to freely exercise their religion under RFRA has been substantially burdened by the “accommodation,” which requires the Bishop of Greensburg (or his designees) to sign a form (EBSA Form 700) that thereby facilitates/initiates the provision of contraceptive products, services, and counseling. Based upon the evidence of record as set forth in the Court’s factual findings, this Court concludes that the accommodation substantially burdens Plaintiffs’right to freely exercise their religion.

Trib Total Meida reports on the decision. The court had previously issued a preliminary injunction in the case. (See prior posting.)

Supreme Court Rejects Attempt By County Clerk To Appeal Pennsylvania Same-Sex Marriage Decision

As reported by SCOTUS Blog, on July 9 U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito denied an application for a stay filed by a Pennsylvania clerk of courts.  The applicant was seeking to intervene in a lawsuit decided by a district court in order to appeal the district court's invalidation of Pennsylvania's ban on same-sex marriage. State officials had declined to appeal.  The Supreme Court's docket entry in Santai-Gaffney v. Whitewood denying the application to intervene cited  the Court's denial of a stay last month in an attempt by the National Organization for Marriage to intervene to appeal the invalidation of Oregon's same-sex marriage ban.

County Clerk Asking Supreme Court To Stay Decision Allowing Same-Sex Marriage In Pennsylvania

The Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania clerk of courts continues her efforts to intervene in order to appeal a federal district court's invalidation of Pennsylvania's ban on same-sex marriage.  Last week, the 3rd Circuit in Whitewood v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Health, (3d Cir., July 3, 2014) issued a summary order affirming the district court's refusal to permit her to intervene. Remaining unhappy with the Governor's decision not to appeal the underlying decision permitting same-sex marriage, county clerk Theresa Santai-Gaffney is now asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stay pending appeal the district court's order striking down the state's laws banning same-sex marriage.  In a petition filed Friday with Justice Alito (full text), she argues that when the Supreme Court granted a stay pending appeal to the state of Utah in a similar case, it signaled all lower federal courts that they should do the same. SCOTUS Blog reports more details.

Pennsylvania Federal Court Denies Intervention To Appeal Same-Sex Marriage Case

As previously reported, in May a Pennsylvania federal district court held Pennsylvania's laws banning same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional, and Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett announced that the state will not appeal the decision.  Some two weeks later, Theresa Santai-Gaffney, clerk of courts in Schuylkill County moved to intervene in order to appeal the court's decision to the 3rd Circuit.  In Whitewood v. Wolf, (MD PA, June 18, 2014), the federal district court rejected the motion to intervene.  The court held that Santai-Gafney has not met the criteria for either intervention as of right or permissive intervention.  The court said:

At bottom, we have before us a contrived legal argument by a private citizen who seeks to accomplish what the chief executive of the Commonwealth, in his wisdom, has declined to do.

AP reports on the decision.

Court Upholds Pennsylvania's Sunday Hunting Ban

In Hunters United For Sunday Hunting v. Pennsylvania Game Commission, (MD PA, June 18, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court rejected constitutional challenges by a hunters' group to Pennsylvania's ban on Sunday hunting for fur bearing animals or game.  Plaintiffs had asserted that the ban violates the 2nd Amendment, the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause, and the First Amendment's religion clauses. Rejecting plaintiff's establishment clause claim, the court said in part:

The Court cannot divine Plaintiffs’ injury-in-fact from their allegation that “Defendants [sic] enforcement and prohibition on Sunday hunting no longer has a secular basis but instead a religious basis.”

The court also pointed to Supreme Court precedent upholding Sunday closing laws.  AP reports on the decision. (See prior related posting.)

Court Strikes Down Pennsylvania Ban On Same-Sex Marriage

In Whitewood v. Wolf, (MD PA, May 20, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court held that the Pennsylvania's prohibition of same-sex marriage and its refusal to recognize same-sex marriages validly entered elsewhere violate the 14th Amendment's due process and equal protection clauses. The court concluded that "the fundamental right to marry is a personal right to be exercised by the individual" and rejected "Defendants’ contention that concepts of history and tradition dictate that same-sex marriage is excluded from the fundamental right to marry."  In its lengthy equal protection analysis, the court concluded that classifications based on sexual orientation are quasi-suspect and applied intermediate scrutiny to find that Pennsylvania had not shown that the ban on same-sex marriage is substantially related to an important governmental interest.

The Washington Post reports that immediately after the court's ruling, same-sex couples hurried to obtain marriage licenses, fearing that Gov. Tom Corbett would appeal the ruling. County offices remained open late in Philadelphia to issue licenses, and the Pittsburgh office is taking marriage license applications online.  Pennsylvania has a 3-day waiting period after issuance of a license before a person can marry, unless a court waives the waiting period. The Governor's office said it was studying the court's ruling. The Governor defended the state's ban in court after the state's attorney general refused to do so.

UPDATE: On May 21, Gov. Tom Corbett announced that the state will not appeal the court's decision.

Inmate With Multiple Wives Can Move Ahead With RLUIPA Challenge To Conjugal Visit Rule

While prisoner lawsuits challenging limits on conjugal visits are not particularly unusual, the challenge involved in Thomas v. Corbett, (PA Commonwealth Ct., April 29, 2014) presents unusual facts.  As described by the court:

Thomas raises several claims in the Complaint relating to DOC’s conjugal visit policy, which precludes conjugal visits for all inmates. Thomas avers that his religion requires him to marry and, in fact, to have multiple wives.  Thomas avers that DOC’s policy concerning visits from spouses precludes him from enjoying conjugal visits with his wives. Thomas avers that this policy has a detrimental effect on the status of his marriages, because his wives are threatening to divorce him under Islamic religious rules if they are unable to have intercourse with him.

In the case, the 3-judge Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court  panel refused to dismiss plaintiff's  RLUIPA challenge to the conjugal visit ban at this early stage of the proceedings.  It is not enough for the government to merely allege that it has a compelling interest. The court also allowed plaintiff to move forward with a portion of his challenge to the prison's ban on prayer oil. PennLive reports on the decision.

Suit Challenges School's Ban On Student's Religious Valentine's Cards

Alliance Defending Freedom announced yesterday that it has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Nazareth, Pennsylvania elementary school student and his parents complaining that under school rules the school principal unconstitutionally censored the student's religious Valentine's cards.  The complaint (full text) in J.A. v. Nazareth Area School District, (ED PA, filed 4/7/2014) alleges in part:

5. NASD permitted students in J.A.'s class to distribute a variety of Valentine's cards bearing secular messages, including cards with human skulls, guns, and weapons, as part of the 2014 class celebration of Valentine's Day.

6. But NASD Policy 220, entitled "Student Expression," prohibits students from engaging in any expression, whether oral or written, that "[s]eek[s] to establish the supremacy of a particular religious denomination, sect, or point of view."

7. Pursuant to NASD's Policy 220 and its practice, NASD singled out J.A.'s religious Valentine's cards for prohibition and censure even though there was no evidence that J.A.'s cards would create a material and substantial disruption at school.

Faith Healing Parents Get 3 1/2 to 7 Years In Death of Child

In Philadelphia yesterday, Herbert and Catherine Schaible were sentenced to three and one-half to seven years in prison in the faith-healing death from pneumonia of their 8-month old son last year. The couple pleaded no-contest to third degree murder charges in the case. At the time of the death, the couple were already on 10-years probation for the similar death of another of their children for whom they failed to seek medical treatment. (See prior posting.) The couple belong to the First Century Gospel Church which teaches that illness is to be healed through prayer. AP reports that the prosecution had asked for sentences of 8 to 16 years:

“It was so foreseeable to me that this was going to happen,” said Assistant District Attorney Joanne Pescatore, who prosecuted both cases. “Everybody in the system failed these children.”

After the first death, she and public defender Mythri Jayaraman agreed that the couple’s beliefs were so ingrained that their children remained at risk. They asked the earlier judge to have the family supervised by a Department of Human Services caseworker. Instead, the judge assigned them to probation officers, who are not trained to monitor children’s welfare.

In sentencing the couple, Judge Benjamin Lerner told them: "You’ve killed two of your children. ... Not God. Not your church. Not religious devotion. You."