AP reported yesterday that the Adhi Parasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational and Cultural Society has recently filed a federal lawsuit against West Pikeland Township, Pennsylvania, challenging the Township's refusal to permit the group to build a Hindu Temple larger than 5,000 square feet on a 24.5 acre site in an area zoned residential and conservation. The group wants to build a 26,000-square-foot temple and a 9,000-square-foot auxiliary support building on the site in Chester Springs. Neighbors object. Some of them voiced concerns at the Township Supervisors meeting about a "mosque" and possible movement in of Hindus.
According to a report by Westpikeland.org, proceedings at the Zoning Hearing Board hearing last August revealed that while Hindu group has some 200 members, only about 20 live within 50 miles of the proposed Temple site. The group's attorney, Richard Lipow, says the size of the proposed Temple is dictated by religious considerations. Certain gods need to be a distance from others. The group says that the Township's zoning ordinances violate the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act as well as the group's free exercise, free expression and assembly rights. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Markup of Hate Crimes Bill Begins, Amid Opposition By Some Christian Groups
Yesterday, the House Judiciary Committee began the mark-up of HR 1913, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009. Among other things, the bill will extend coverage to certain crimes committed because of a person's actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity. It will also increase assistance to state and local governments in fighting hate crimes. The Advocate reports that Republican Congressmen opposed to passage of the bill offered a large number of amendments, all of which were defeated. One amendment proposed adding "unborn child" to the definition of those against whom Hate Crimes might be perpetrated. Another amendment proposed adding "pregnant women." Rep. Steve King of Iowa suggested changing the bill's name to the "Local Law Enforcement Thought Crimes Prevention Act of 2009."
Some Christian groups are again this year raising the spectre that the bill, if enacted, would infringe the right of Christian ministers to oppose homosexuality. For example, Jeff King, president of International Christian Concern, called the bill "a backdoor tool from the far left and radical homosexuals to shut down legitimate free speech from Christians and others who oppose their lifestyle." ICC argued that the federal aiding and abetting statute (18 USC 2) could allow prosecution of those "who teach that homosexual behavior is sinful and that Islam is a false religion." A release issued by Americans United this week counters the argument, saying:
Some Christian groups are again this year raising the spectre that the bill, if enacted, would infringe the right of Christian ministers to oppose homosexuality. For example, Jeff King, president of International Christian Concern, called the bill "a backdoor tool from the far left and radical homosexuals to shut down legitimate free speech from Christians and others who oppose their lifestyle." ICC argued that the federal aiding and abetting statute (18 USC 2) could allow prosecution of those "who teach that homosexual behavior is sinful and that Islam is a false religion." A release issued by Americans United this week counters the argument, saying:
The bill penalizes assault and physical violence, not speech. In fact, the legislation makes it clear that free speech is protected. Section 10 states, "Nothing in this Act, or the amendments made by this Act, shall be construed to prohibit any expressive conduct protected from legal prohibition by, or any activities protected by the free speech or free exercise clauses of, the First Amendment to the Constitution."UPDATE: CQ reports that on Thursday (4/23), the House Judiciary Committee approved the Hate Crimes bill by a vote of 15-12. The Committee defeated more than a dozen proposed Republican amendments to the bill.
"Defamation of Religion" and the Durban Review Conference Final Draft
JTA reports that delegates at the United Nations Durban Review Conference in Geneva this week surprisingly adopted the Conference final document on Tuesday, three days before the end of the conference. This move was apparently designed to prevent further debate and modification of the document, or perhaps to prevent further walkouts by delegates. The New York Times describes the action by Conference delegates a bit differently. It reports that while final adoption of the resolution will occur on Friday, on Tuesday the resolution was adopted by the committee that coordinates the conference so that it is no longer open to debate or amendment.
Particularly after the inflammatory speech on Monday by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, most of the press attention has been focused on the Conference's treatment of the Israeli-Palestinian issue. Here the Conference's final document is seen by the U.S. and some other countries as no improvement over Durban I because it "reaffirmed" the 2001 Durban Declaration. (Philadelpha Evening Bulletin.) Anne Bayefsky in the New York Daily News yesterday expanded on the anti-Israel elements of the Conference.
However, another issue of concern leading up to the conference has been efforts by Islamic states to get language into the final document barring "defamation of religion." That reference was removed in negotiations last month. (See prior posting.) The language remains out of the final document; but reference to "negative stereotyping of religions" remains in. This reference can be used by countries to prevent debate or criticism of religious ideas. (See press release from ARTICLE 19.) However the final document also strongly emphasizes the importance of freedom of expression.
In what appears to be the final version of the Outcome Document that was adopted (March 17 draft from UN Watch), here is the relevant language:
Particularly after the inflammatory speech on Monday by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, most of the press attention has been focused on the Conference's treatment of the Israeli-Palestinian issue. Here the Conference's final document is seen by the U.S. and some other countries as no improvement over Durban I because it "reaffirmed" the 2001 Durban Declaration. (Philadelpha Evening Bulletin.) Anne Bayefsky in the New York Daily News yesterday expanded on the anti-Israel elements of the Conference.
However, another issue of concern leading up to the conference has been efforts by Islamic states to get language into the final document barring "defamation of religion." That reference was removed in negotiations last month. (See prior posting.) The language remains out of the final document; but reference to "negative stereotyping of religions" remains in. This reference can be used by countries to prevent debate or criticism of religious ideas. (See press release from ARTICLE 19.) However the final document also strongly emphasizes the importance of freedom of expression.
In what appears to be the final version of the Outcome Document that was adopted (March 17 draft from UN Watch), here is the relevant language:
Another press release this week from the UK free speech group, ARTICLE 19, decrying the boycotting of the Conference by some countries, describes the Document's language on free expression in more upbeat terms than many other rights groups might be willing to do:10. Recognizes with deep concern the negative stereotyping of religions and the global rise in the number of incidents of racial or religious intolerance and violence, including Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, Christianophobia and anti-Arabism;
11. Reaffirms that any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law, as well as the dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority and hatred and acts of violence and incitement to such acts, and that these prohibitions are consistent with freedom of opinion and expression;....55. Reaffirms the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, as well as the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can play in combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;
56. Stresses that the right to freedom of opinion and expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic, pluralistic society, since it ensures access to a multitude of ideas and views;
Months of negotiation have resulted in a draft Outcome Document that reaffirms the essential role of freedom of expression and freedom of information while omitting any reference to "defamation of religions", a concept rejected by free speech activists because it protects belief systems against criticisms or jokes and is incompatible with international human rights law. The Document's current language acknowledges the primacy of the individual as rights holder rather than religion.
According to Mr. Moataz El Fegiery, Executive Director of Cairo Institute for Human Rights, "The replacement of 'defamation of religion' with language protecting an individual's freedom of belief represents a significant acknowledgment by the international community that international law does not recognise this concept; and that it should not be used by the United Nations."
Amended Complaint Protests Second Song Given To 3rd Graders In Florida School
Last week, a Florida federal district court issued a preliminary injunction on Establishment Clause grounds barring Webster Elementary School in St. Johns County, Florida from directing students to rehearse or perform the Diamond Rio band's song, "In God We Still Trust." (See prior posting.) On Tuesday, an amended complaint was filed in the case charging that five days after the issuance of the preliminary injunction, the music teacher at Webster began to teach another "sectarian" song, again to third-graders. This one is titled "Chatter With the Angels." According to yesterday's St. Augustine Record, the amended complaint charges that directing students to perform "Chatter" constitutes retaliation against plaintiffs for having brought the suit challenging "In God We Still Trust." The amended complaint seeks a preliminary injunction barring introduction of this song until the court can rule on the merits of plaintiffs' objections.
In an updated report this morning, the St. Augustine Record says that Chatter With the Angels, an African-American spiritual, is in an approved textbook used throughout the state, and the song has been on the state's approved teaching list for over 20 years. School district officials say the song will not be sung again until the court makes a ruling. Here, via YouTube, is a performance of "Chatter With the Angels" by a Bridgeport (CT) Children's Choir.
In an updated report this morning, the St. Augustine Record says that Chatter With the Angels, an African-American spiritual, is in an approved textbook used throughout the state, and the song has been on the state's approved teaching list for over 20 years. School district officials say the song will not be sung again until the court makes a ruling. Here, via YouTube, is a performance of "Chatter With the Angels" by a Bridgeport (CT) Children's Choir.
NY Murder Trial, Pevaded By Religion, Ends with Convictions
The New York Times on Monday reported on the conclusion of a Queens (NY) murder trial that has torn apart the small local community of Bukharian Jews. The two defendants were sentenced to life in prison without parole. One defendant, Dr. Mazoltuv Borukhova was charged with hiring the other defendant, Mikhail Mallayev, to murder her estranged husband, Dr. Daniel Malikov, after a court awarded temporary custody of their daughter to Malikov. The murder took place on a playground in front of the 4 year old daughter. As reflected in a New York Times article last month, the defendants' religion has been a pervasive theme in the background of the trial:
Just before sentencing, Mallayev told the judge he did not kill anyone, saying: "I live by the Ten Commandments." During sentencing, Justice Robert J. Hanophy quoted both the New Testament and Confucius.
Both Dr. Borukhova and Mr. Mallayev told the police that they would never be involved in anything illegal because of their religious beliefs. Dr. Borukhova's relatives sit every day in the second row of State Supreme Court, murmuring prayers from books printed in Russian and Hebrew. Dr. Malakov’s relatives occasionally hiss at them across the aisle.The defendants' Sabbath observance became the center of another controversy as the judge attempted to assure that the trial would end and the jury would return a verdict before his previously scheduled vacation was to begin. In order to avoid court appearances on the Sabbath, defendants' counsel ended up having only overnight to prepare his summation, while the prosecution ended up with the weekend to prepare theirs.
Covering their hair in accordance with religious rules for married women, Dr. Borukhova’s sisters wear bouffant wigs that became an issue when prosecutors claimed that an eyewitness saw one sister at the murder scene..... Mr. Mallayev wore a black leather skullcap and matching jacket early in the trial, but switched to a more staid look: a suit and a velvet yarmulke bearing the Star of David. Earlier, he refused on religious grounds to shave his beard to appear in a lineup, finally agreeing to a shave with an electric razor.
Just before sentencing, Mallayev told the judge he did not kill anyone, saying: "I live by the Ten Commandments." During sentencing, Justice Robert J. Hanophy quoted both the New Testament and Confucius.
Suit Challenges Use of Church For High School Graduation
Americans United yesterday announced that it has filed a lawsuit in a Wisconsin federal court seeking to enjoin the Elmbrook (WI) School District from holding graduation ceremonies for its two high schools in Elmbrook Church (or any other religious venue) unless all religious symbols visible to attendees, both inside and outside the church, are covered or removed. The complaint in Does v. Elmbrook Joint Common School District No. 21, (ED WI, filed 4/22/2009) (full text), alleges that the district has held high school graduation in the sanctuary of Elmbrook Church for nearly a decade. A 15 to 20 foot high cross towers above the graduates during the ceremony. (Photo.) The Church has made a policy decision that it will not cover the cross during the ceremonies, wishing to rent out its facilities for use without compromising the Church's identity. The Memorandum In Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (full text) argues that the use of the Church for graduation ceremonies under a large cross is a manifest violation of the Establishment Clause.
German Parents Challenge Sex Education Module in European Human Rights Court
Earlier this week in Germany, the parents of an 11 year old girl filed an Application (full text) with the European Court of Human Rights challenging a fine of 120 Euros imposed on them by a German court for their refusal to send their daughter to school for four days during which a module on sexual abuse prevention was being taught. The classes focused on a stage play titled "My Body Is Mine". The parents, Eduard and Elisabeth Elscheit allege that the play and classes infringed their ability to instill Christian ethics in their daughter Franziska. They argue that the classes encourage children to become sexually active by teaching them to follow their inner feelings on sexuality. The parents contend that Protocol 1, Art. 2 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights protects their right to educate their children according to their own religious and philosophical beliefs. Alliance Defense Fund, which is representing the parents, issued a release on Tuesday announcing the appeal.
Miss California's Comments On Gay Marriage Create Controversy
Last Sunday night, Miss North Carolina, Kristen Dalton, was crowned Miss USA. (ABC News). However much of the attention since then has been focuses on runner-up, Miss California-- Carrie Prejean. The consensus seems to be that Prejean lost the top spot because of an answer about gay marriage that she gave in response to a question by, Perez Hilton, one of the judges. Prejean said: "I think it's great Americans are able to choose one or the other.... [I]n my country, in my family I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody there, but that's how I was raised and that's how I think it should be, between a man and a woman." (ABC News).
The fallout continues. Fox News published an article Tuesday exploring whether Prejean had a cause of action for religious discrimination. And others injected the incident into the battle in Congress over enactment of the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (HR 1913) which has again been introduced into Congress. As reported by the Washington Post, an e-mail sent on Monday to supporters by Gary Bauer of American Values said that the incident: "should be a wake-up call to men and women of faith and everyone who cherishes freedom of speech and religious liberty. The backlash to (Miss California's) commonsense comments demonstrates the naked intolerance of the militant homosexual movement . . . And if it gets its way in Congress, comments like (hers) may someday be considered a 'hate crime.'" David Waters, in a Washington Post blog, also reflects on the entire series of events.
The fallout continues. Fox News published an article Tuesday exploring whether Prejean had a cause of action for religious discrimination. And others injected the incident into the battle in Congress over enactment of the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (HR 1913) which has again been introduced into Congress. As reported by the Washington Post, an e-mail sent on Monday to supporters by Gary Bauer of American Values said that the incident: "should be a wake-up call to men and women of faith and everyone who cherishes freedom of speech and religious liberty. The backlash to (Miss California's) commonsense comments demonstrates the naked intolerance of the militant homosexual movement . . . And if it gets its way in Congress, comments like (hers) may someday be considered a 'hate crime.'" David Waters, in a Washington Post blog, also reflects on the entire series of events.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
9th Circuit Says Arizona Scholarship Tax Credits Likely Violate Establishment Clause
In Winn v. Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization, (9th Cir., April 21, 2009), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an Arizona federal district court's dismissal of a lawsuit challenging Arizona's scholarship tax credit program. The Court of Appeals held that plaintiffs have taxpayer standing. It went on to conclude that plaintiffs' allegations state a claim that Arizona's program as applied violates the Establishment Clause. Arizona grants a tax credit of up to $500 to individuals who contribute funds to nonprofit "school tuition organizations." STO's in turn award private school scholarships to children. In practice, 85% of contributed funds are available only for scholarships to religious schools.
The court wrote at length distinguishing Arizona's plan from the school voucher program upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Zelman case. Here, while taxpayers have a choice of which STO's they will support, parents' choices are constrained by taxpayers' decisions of which STO's to fund. The state has delegated discretion to taxpayers that is used to create incentives for parents to send their children to religious schools. (See prior related posting.) Phoenix's East Valley Tribune reports on the decision.
The court wrote at length distinguishing Arizona's plan from the school voucher program upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Zelman case. Here, while taxpayers have a choice of which STO's they will support, parents' choices are constrained by taxpayers' decisions of which STO's to fund. The state has delegated discretion to taxpayers that is used to create incentives for parents to send their children to religious schools. (See prior related posting.) Phoenix's East Valley Tribune reports on the decision.
Two Days of Negotiations Start Over Reform of FLDS Land Ownership
According to AP, today in Salt Lake City, Utah, two days of meetings begin between all the parties to try to reach an agreement on how to finally deal with FLDS Church property owned by the United Effort Plan Trust. In 2005, Utah appointed a special trustee to modify the trust and provide for secular management of the property owned by the polygamous FLDS sect. The trustee, Bruce Wisan, has been moving toward eventually conveying the land to FLDS members (and former members) in private ownership. FLDS members, however, say that their religious beliefs call for sharing of the land by those who adhere to Church teachings. The Utah Attorney General's office has drafted an initial proposal that it has shown to Wisan and to the Colorado attorney general's office, but not to the FLDS negotiators. (See prior related posting.)
UPDATE: The Salt Lake Tribune reported on Thursday that there are some signs of compromise in the negotiations. The major issues are how to allow FLDS members and those who left or never belonged to FLDS to live together. There are also questions of how to manage common areas such as a park, cemetery and health clinic, and how to pay the UEP trust's debts. One proposal under discussion is a 5-person board made up of 2 FLDS members, 2 non-members and a neutral to deal with housing claims.
UPDATE: The Salt Lake Tribune reported on Thursday that there are some signs of compromise in the negotiations. The major issues are how to allow FLDS members and those who left or never belonged to FLDS to live together. There are also questions of how to manage common areas such as a park, cemetery and health clinic, and how to pay the UEP trust's debts. One proposal under discussion is a 5-person board made up of 2 FLDS members, 2 non-members and a neutral to deal with housing claims.
Turkmenistan Court Imposes 2 Years Suspended On Conscientious Objector
Forum 18 reported Monday that in Turkmenistan, a two-year suspended sentence has been imposed on a conscientious objector who refused compulsory military service. Zafar Abdullaev, a Jehovah's Witness, was charged with violating Article 219, Part 1 of the Criminal Code. The UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief has called on Turkmenistan to create an alternative civilian service option for conscientious objectors. Shirin Akhmedova, Director Turkmenistan's National Institute for Democracy and Human Rights, however, says that conscientious objectors can already serve in medical or construction units within the army. Some however, do not find this option religiously acceptable.
Pastor Sues Broadcaster For Stopping His Religious Activities At CNN Building
In Atlanta (GA), pastor Dick Christensen has filed suit against CNN, Turner Broadcasting and a security guard for false imprisonment, assault and battery, and violating his free speech and free exercise of religion rights. According to WSBTV News yesterday, in December 2008 Christensen and others were proselytizing, carrying banners and handing out Christian literature in front of the CNN headquarters building. A CNN security guard told Christensen he was on CNN property and should move. Christensen insisted he was on a public sidewalk. CNN guards placed Christensen on the ground, handcuffed him and held him in CNN offices for two hours or so before releasing him. CNN says it does not agree with Christensen's version of events. Christensen says that CNN is "hostile to the Christian message."
Judge Orders FBI To Turn Documents On Surveillance of Muslims Over to Court
The ACLU of Southern California yesterday won a preliminary victory in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit it filed in 2007 on behalf of 11 Muslim American leaders, mosques and local organizations who are seeking information on FBI monitoring of themselves and other groups. (See prior related posting.) USA Today and an ACLU press release report on the order issued by a California federal district judge requiring the FBI to turn some 100 documents over to the court so it can decide whether they should be publicly released. The court also ordered the FBI to conduct a search in its offices nationwide for any records of electronic surveillance of the Council on American-Islamic Relations of Greater Los Angeles and its executive director. The ACLU charges that the FBI is targeting Muslims in southern California for surveillance based on their religion.
Christian Leaders In Australian Town Oppose Construction of Muslim School
In Camden, Australia, a town around 40 miles southwest of Sydney, a group of Christian leaders have joined together to oppose approval of plans for a Muslim school to be built by the Quranic Society. Last May, Camden Council voted unanimously to reject the school's plans. The Quranic Society has now reduced the size of its proposed school and has taken its case to the Land and Environment Court. Today's Sydney Morning Herald reports that a letter from the Christian group was read in court yesterday. It said in part: "Our concern is the Quranic Society inevitably advocates a political ideological position that is incompatible with the Australian way of life. This includes promoting Quranic law as being superior to national laws and regarding followers of any rival religion as inevitably at enmity with it."
Pakistani Court Overturns Two Blasphemy Convicitions
Compass Direct News reported yesterday that two elderly Christian men convicted of blasphemy in Pakistan have had their convictions overturned by a high court in Lahore. Last Thursday the court reversed the 10-year sentences of 67-year old James Masih and 72-year old Buta Masih who had been accused of burning pages from the Quran. They were also charged with terrorism- related offenses of creating fear and panic. The men say that the charges were fabricated as part of a dispute over land that a Muslim neighbor wanted James Masih to sell. Police arrested the two men in October 2006 as a group of 500 Muslims who had heard rumors of the Quran burning tried to kill the men. They men have already served over two years of their terms.
White House Plans For National Day of Prayer Are Uncertain
Federal law (36 USC 119) designates the first Thursday in May as National Day of Prayer, though a pending federal lawsuit is challenging the constitutionality of that statute. (See prior posting.) A Religion News Service article published yesterday reports that there is a good deal of uncertainty over whether the White House will host an official observance of the event this year. The Bush White House during its eight years had marked the day with a ceremony in the East Room attended by a range of religious leaders. The National Day of Prayer Task Force headed by Shirley Dobson is planning its own event, as in past years. However this year it is scheduling its ceremony on Capitol Hill in the morning-- the time when the White House event, with Dobson and others in attendance, had traditionally been held. Brian Toon, vice chair of the Task Force, says this year the White House has not been in touch with them about its plans. Joshua DuBois, executive director of the White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships, said on Sunday that it is "too early to talk about the planning" for the National Day of Prayer.
UPDATE: On April 21, the Interfaith Alliance and Jews on First sent a letter to President Obama (full text) requesting that he issue a Proclamation calling for a National Day of Prayer and Reflection that is inclusive of all religious traditions as well as of those professing no religion. The letter says that "several years ago, the National Day of Prayer was taken over by a group of religious exclusivists led by Shirley Dobson of Focus on the Family."
UPDATE: On April 21, the Interfaith Alliance and Jews on First sent a letter to President Obama (full text) requesting that he issue a Proclamation calling for a National Day of Prayer and Reflection that is inclusive of all religious traditions as well as of those professing no religion. The letter says that "several years ago, the National Day of Prayer was taken over by a group of religious exclusivists led by Shirley Dobson of Focus on the Family."
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Historian Discusses Early School Bible Reading Case
On April 1, the Ohio Supreme Court hosted an hour-long Forum on "The Cincinnati Bible War Case of 1873," with a presentation by Notre Dame historian Linda Przybyszewski. A video of the full presentation is online. The Court's press release on the Forum summarizes the history:
Amid the increasing diversity and pluralism of the post-Civil War era, the Cincinnati public schools were faced with a growing Catholic population unhappy that their children were instructed with the protestant version of the Bible. The school board’s solution to remove all bibles from the classroom erupted into a raging national controversy over the relationship between religion and government. In 1873, the Ohio Supreme Court put an end to the Cincinnati Bible War, upholding the board’s decision to end Bible reading in its schools.The Ohio Supreme Court decision at the center of this discussion is Board of Education v. Minor, 23 Ohio St. 211 (OH Sup. Ct., 1873) [LEXIS link to full opinion]. The opinion is full of surprisingly 21st-century sounding defenses of church-state separation and protection of minority religions. The following is an example, but a full reading of the opinion is well worth the time:
Counsel say that to withdraw all religious instruction from the schools would be to put them under the control of "infidel sects." This is by no means so. To teach the doctrines of infidelity, and thereby teach that Christianity is false, is one thing; and to give no instructions on the subject is quite another thing. The only fair and impartial method, where serious objection is made, is to let each sect give its own instructions, elsewhere than in the state schools, where of necessity all are to meet; and to put disputed doctrines of religion among other subjects of instruction, for there are many others, which can more conveniently, satisfactorily, and safely be taught elsewhere.
Notre Dame Alums Call For Contribution Boycott Over Obama Invitation
A group of Notre Dame alumni, protesting University's invitation to President Barack Obama to speak at graduation and receive an honorary degree, are now calling for Father John Jenkins to be replaced as president of the University. Zenit reports that a "Replace Jenkins" website, objecting to Obama's "well known commitment to abortion in the broadest possible context" says that "Father Jenkins' decision to honor President Obama directly violates the 2004 US Conference of Catholic Bishops’ directive on Catholics in Political Life and is offensive to all Catholics." The website call on alums to sign a petition pledging to withhold contributions until Jenkins is replaced. The website says that supporters can instead contribute directly to pro-life organizations at the university, and that these amounts will be credited by Notre Dame to the alum's eligibility for the football lottery. (See prior related posting.)
Court Denies Tax Exemption For Property Leased To Summer Camp
A New York trial court has denied an exemption for 2006-08 property taxes for 130 acres of land in Pomona, New York owned by Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, according to a report last week by the Lower Hudson Journal News. The court ruled that the Rabbinical College's profit from leasing the land to a summer camp makes the undeveloped property unconnected to the Rabbinical College's other activities. The Village of Pomona has already granted an exemption for 2009 taxes, but will consider revoking it for future years. A discrimination suit against Pomona is pending in federal court over the Villae of Pomona's refusal to permit the Rabbinical College to build facilities on 30 acres of its land. (See prior posting.)
UPDATE: The text of the court's decision in Congregation Rabbinical Coll. of Tartikov, Inc. v Town of Ramapo, (NY Sup. Ct., April 15, 2009), is now available online.
UPDATE: The text of the court's decision in Congregation Rabbinical Coll. of Tartikov, Inc. v Town of Ramapo, (NY Sup. Ct., April 15, 2009), is now available online.
Creationist Institute Sues Texas Higher Ed Board Over Denial of Certification
The Institute for Creation Research has filed suit in a Texas federal court against the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board charging that the state agency violated its civil rights by denying it a certificate of authority to offer a masters degree in science education. The Institute says it is "the only graduate school which specializes in creationism-informed science education." It argues that without its program: "The monopolistic realities of the science education market in Texas (and in America generally) would limit creationist learners to science education opportunities from evolutionist graduate schools." Today's Dallas Morning News reports that the Institute had previously been approved by California authorities to offer a degree program, but now needs Texas approval because it moved its offices from San Diego to Dallas in 2006. (See prior related posting.)
UPDATE: Here are links to the full complaint and related documents, thanks to a commenter.
UPDATE: Here are links to the full complaint and related documents, thanks to a commenter.
Russian Orthodox Church Wants UN To Reocognize Problem of "Christianophobia"
Interfax reports today that the Russian Orthodox Church has asked this week's Durban Review Conference (World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance) being held in Geneva to add the notion of "Christianophobia" to the world's lexicon. Archpriest Georgy Ryabykh, deputy head of the Moscow Patriarchate Department for External Church Relations, says UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon mentioned anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in his opening remarks at the Conference, but made no mention of insults to Christians and violation of their rights. (See prior related posting.)
Monday, April 20, 2009
NY Court Says Muslim Marriage Is Valid, Even Though Not Recognized In NJ
New York law recognizes a marriage celebrated in a religious ceremony as valid even if the parties do not obtain the required marriage license. (NY Dom. Rel. Law § 25). New Jersey, on the other hand, does not recognize a religious marriage as valid if the parties failed to obtain a marriage license. (N.J. Stat. § 37:1-10). In Matter of Farraj, (NY Sup. Ct., April 14, 2009), a New York trial court held that New York law would be applied to render a Muslim marriage performed in New Jersey valid, even though the parties did not obtain a marriage license. The ceremony was held in New Jersey only because Islamic law requires that the marriage take place at the home of the bride's eldest male relative-- here her brother. The groom and the officiating imam both traveled from New York for the ceremony. The couple went back to New York for the wedding reception and lived in New York from that time until the husband's death over four years later. The court relied on Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws Section 283 to hold that the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the parties and the marriage should govern to validate the marriage.
The court went on to rule that since the marriage was valid, petitioner, Rabaa M. Hanash, has standing as a surviving spouse to petition the court for an accounting of her deceased husband's estate. One of the deceased husband's adult children from a former marriage had contested Hanash's right to demand an accounting, arguing that she was never lawfully married to Daoud Farraj .
The court went on to rule that since the marriage was valid, petitioner, Rabaa M. Hanash, has standing as a surviving spouse to petition the court for an accounting of her deceased husband's estate. One of the deceased husband's adult children from a former marriage had contested Hanash's right to demand an accounting, arguing that she was never lawfully married to Daoud Farraj .
Cert. Denied In Challenge To Jury's Use of Bible In Deliberations
The U.S. Supreme court today denied certiorari in Oliver v. Quarterman, Docket No. 08-833). (Order List.) In the case, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals held that a jury's use of the Bible during the sentencing phase in a murder case was improper, but was not shown to have influenced the jury's decision. (See prior posting.)
President's Faith Based Council Creates 6 Task Forces
The Washington Post today provides more information on what the President's Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships is doing. It has set up six task forces to advise the President. The task forces are on (1) reform of the faith-based office, (2) fatherhood, (3) U.S. economic recovery, (4) interreligious dialogue, (5) global poverty, and (6) the environment and climate change. One topic, however, has become too controversial for the task forces to handle. The question of whether faith-based groups that take government funds can use religious criteria in hiring has been removed from the task force on reform of the faith-based office and given over to the White House legal counsel and the Justice Department.
Islamists Demand Additional Concessions On Islamic Law In Pakistan
Last week, Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari signed the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation 2009, implementing Islamic law in the Malakand division of the Northwest Frontier Province. (See prior posting.) Under an arrangement with the Taliban, a special bench of the Peshawar High Court was to be set up, to be renamed Dar-ul-Quza (Qazi court), and a Sessions judge —to now be called Qazi — will hear cases with an Alim-e-Din (Quranic scholar) who will decide "religious technicalities." (See prior posting.) However the Washington Post reports on a speech yesterday to thousands, aired live on national television, by Sufi Muhammad, founder of banned militant organization Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi (TNSM), that is pressing for far greater government concessions.
According to Pakistan's Daily Times, Sufi told the audience that Pakistan's superior courts are un-Islamic and could not hear appeals from decisions of qazi courts set up in Malakand. He demanded that the government withdraw all judges from the Malakand division within four days and set up a Darul Qaza to hear appeals from the new qazi courts. Sufi also told the crowd: "There is no room for democracy in Islam," and demanded appointment of Qazi courts throughout the Malakand division. The Washington Post comments that Sufi's speech, along with one Friday at the Red Mosque in Islamabad by radical cleric Abdul Aziz (see prior posting), "pose a direct, unprecedented religious challenge to modern state authority" in Pakistan.
According to Pakistan's Daily Times, Sufi told the audience that Pakistan's superior courts are un-Islamic and could not hear appeals from decisions of qazi courts set up in Malakand. He demanded that the government withdraw all judges from the Malakand division within four days and set up a Darul Qaza to hear appeals from the new qazi courts. Sufi also told the crowd: "There is no room for democracy in Islam," and demanded appointment of Qazi courts throughout the Malakand division. The Washington Post comments that Sufi's speech, along with one Friday at the Red Mosque in Islamabad by radical cleric Abdul Aziz (see prior posting), "pose a direct, unprecedented religious challenge to modern state authority" in Pakistan.
Egypt Presses Government Employees To Stop Wearing Niqab
Egypt's Ministry of Religious Endowments has held the first in a series of seminars designed to convince Muslim women in government jobs to stop wearing the niqab-- the full face veil. Those attending the seminar were given a book titled "Face Veil is a Custom not a Religious Obligation." Al Arabiya reports today that this follows a ban earlier this month imposed by the Ministry of Health on nurses wearing the niqab in hospitals. The government campaign is aimed at convincing women that the headscarf is sufficient under Islamic law.
Recent Articles of Interest
From SSRN:
- Kenneth L. Marcus, Jurisprudence of the New Anti-Semitism, (Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 44, 2009).
From Bepress:
- Patrick McKinley Brennan, Delivering The Goods: Herein of Mead, Delegations, and Authority, (Villanova University School of Law Working Paper Series, Working Paper 129, March 2009).
From SmartCILP:
- Edward B. Arroyo, Contemplating the Katrina Whirlwind: From "Apocalypse Now" To Solidarity For the Common Good, 7 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 163-203 (2008).
- James A. Davids, Pounding a Final Stake In the Heart of the Invidiously Discriminatory "Pervasively Sectarian" Test, 7 Ave Maria Law Review 59-121 (2008).
- Barbara J. Fleischer, Katrina Stories: Windows Into Religious Meaning, Pathways to Social Justice, 7 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 11-36 (2008).
- Anthony R. Picarello, Jr., The Good News of InnerChange, 7 Ave Maria Law Review 25-57 (2008).
- Thomas Ryan, Vision and Spirituality In Post-Katrina New Orleans, 7 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 101-125 (2008).
Sunday, April 19, 2009
US Will Boycott Durban Review Conference
The State Department, in a press release issued yesterday, announced that it would boycott the United Nations Durban Review Conference being held in Geneva this week. This follows earlier withdrawal of the U.S. from pre-conference meetings and a statement that it would re-engage only if dramatic changes were made in the conference draft resolution. (See prior posting.) The Hudson Institute's Eye on the UN last week published a scathing report on the final draft of the review conference outcome document that continues to reflect the agenda of Islamic countries. CNN reports that the Congressional Black Caucus was dismayed at President Obama's decision and would have liked the U.S. to send a diverse delegation to the anti-racism conference.
Somalia Adopts Islamic Law
According today's the New York Times, Somalia's Parliament yesterday voted unanimously to institute Islamic law in the country. The vote ratifies a decision by the cabinet last month. Justice Minister Sheik Abdirahman Mohamoud Farah said that the adoption of Sharia was designed to undercut support for Islamist opponents of the government.
Directory of Church Social Services Distributed In Schools Is Criticized
Civil libertarians are criticizing a directory of youth groups and programs distributed to students in Greece, New York public schools last week. They say that its Christian focus crosses the church-state line. Today's Rochester (NY) Democrat & Chronicle reports that the directory was produced and funded by local churches and lists mostly programs offered by Christian churches in town. However a few community food pantry, educational and support resources are also included. The directory is signed by the Greece Central School District superintendent, the school board president and a local Baptist pastor who heads a faith committee of the school board that provides input from the faith community. School officials say the directory is merely a resource for parents and young people looking for help, and that they worked with school district attorneys to avoid church-state issues.
EEOC Sues Over Harassment of Evangelical Employee
Business Management Daily reports today that the EEOC has filed a religious discrimination lawsuit against a Mount Airy, Virginia carport dealer for failing to respond to complaints from an employee about religious harassment from co-workers. Brenda Thompson, who belongs to an evangelical nondenominational church, was called a "devil-worshipper" by her co-workers. They also called here religion a "cult".
Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Odneal v. Pierce, (5th Cir., April 3, 2009), the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals held that a Texas federal district court had improperly rejected a RLUIPA claim by a Native American inmate who wanted to maintain long hair (a kouplock) and wear a medicine pouch. However the court upheld the dismissal of plaintiff's challenge to the frequency of religious services in his prison unit. Earlier this month the Houston Chronicle reported on the decision.
Al-Amin v. Shear, (4th Cir., April 10, 2009), the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a Virginia district court's decision, holding that the trial court had applied the wrong standard in rejecting plaintiff's claim under RLUIPA that he should be able to use his now-legal name (Al-Amin) in place of his name when he was committed (Jones) to access his inmate account. In connection with plaintiff's claims regarding his diet during Ramadan, the court held that the statute of limitations under RLUIPA is 4 years, and that factual questions remained about some of his claims. The court also held that the district court had improperly dismissed on statute of limitations grounds plaintiff's claims regarding refusal of donations of Islamic materials for the prison chaplain's library.
In Greenberg v. Hill, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28027 (SD OH, March 31, 2009), an Ohio federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation, holding that an inmate's free exercise and RLUIPA rights were not violated when Jewish inmates were denied a full kosher Seder meal on two nights in April 2007.
In Allen v. Tilton, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28499 (CD CA, April 2, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed, but allowed the filing of an amended complaint, by a Muslim inmate who claims his fre exercise rights were violated when he was denied a Halal diet.
In Riley v. Terhune, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29082 (ED CA, April 2, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge rejected an inmate's claim his free exercise and RLUIPA rights were violated by the correction department's grooming regulations. Plaintiff had alleged only that he practices an ancient Egyptian religion that requires long hair.
In Lichtenthal v. Brustman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29153 (D NJ, April 7, 2009), a New Jersey federal district judge rejected an inmate's claim that he should be permitted to reside at a halfway house closer to his home or permitted to drive 180 miles to his home to observe the Jewish Sabbath and be given a furlough to observe Passover.
In Menefield v. Tilton, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30504 (ED CA, March 27, 2009). a California federal district judge permitted a Muslim prisoner to proceed with free exercise, equal protection and RLUIPA challenges to the refusal to provide him with either Halal or kosher meals. The court also ordered appointment of counsel for plaintiff.
In Jones v. Burk, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30859 (ED CA, March 26, 2009), a California federal district judge allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim for damages under RLUIPA growing out of the refusal by prison authorities to allow plaintiff to keep prayer beads, prayer oil, prayer clay and a skull cap.
In Jones v. Walker, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31387 (WD TX, March 17, 2009), a Texas federal district judge adopted a magistrate's recommendation and dismissed an inmate's claims that prison officials failed to follow state policies on confiscating and destroying a "contraband" prayer rug and providing rotation of pork-free substitutes and pork-free holiday meals.
KATV News reports that in a case on remand from the 8th Circuit (see prior posting), a Tennessee federal district judge has awarded an inmate damages of $625 for violation of his free exercise rights. Plaintiff was required to clean his cell on Saturday mornings in violation of his observance of the Sabbath.
In Bailey v. Rubenstein, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32192 (SD WV, April 15, 2009), a West Virginia federal district court accepted a magistrate's recommendation and dismissed a claim by a Native American inmate that prison restrictions on smoking infringed his free exercise rights and his rights under RLUIPA.
In Blount v. Echols, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108397 (WD AK, Sept. 4, 2008), an Arkansas federal magistrate judge rejected defendant's motion for summary judgment and permitted a Mormon inmate to move ahead with his challenge to prison rules that allow detainees to have only one religious book while in lock-down.
Al-Amin v. Shear, (4th Cir., April 10, 2009), the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a Virginia district court's decision, holding that the trial court had applied the wrong standard in rejecting plaintiff's claim under RLUIPA that he should be able to use his now-legal name (Al-Amin) in place of his name when he was committed (Jones) to access his inmate account. In connection with plaintiff's claims regarding his diet during Ramadan, the court held that the statute of limitations under RLUIPA is 4 years, and that factual questions remained about some of his claims. The court also held that the district court had improperly dismissed on statute of limitations grounds plaintiff's claims regarding refusal of donations of Islamic materials for the prison chaplain's library.
In Greenberg v. Hill, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28027 (SD OH, March 31, 2009), an Ohio federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation, holding that an inmate's free exercise and RLUIPA rights were not violated when Jewish inmates were denied a full kosher Seder meal on two nights in April 2007.
In Allen v. Tilton, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28499 (CD CA, April 2, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed, but allowed the filing of an amended complaint, by a Muslim inmate who claims his fre exercise rights were violated when he was denied a Halal diet.
In Riley v. Terhune, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29082 (ED CA, April 2, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge rejected an inmate's claim his free exercise and RLUIPA rights were violated by the correction department's grooming regulations. Plaintiff had alleged only that he practices an ancient Egyptian religion that requires long hair.
In Lichtenthal v. Brustman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29153 (D NJ, April 7, 2009), a New Jersey federal district judge rejected an inmate's claim that he should be permitted to reside at a halfway house closer to his home or permitted to drive 180 miles to his home to observe the Jewish Sabbath and be given a furlough to observe Passover.
In Menefield v. Tilton, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30504 (ED CA, March 27, 2009). a California federal district judge permitted a Muslim prisoner to proceed with free exercise, equal protection and RLUIPA challenges to the refusal to provide him with either Halal or kosher meals. The court also ordered appointment of counsel for plaintiff.
In Jones v. Burk, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30859 (ED CA, March 26, 2009), a California federal district judge allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim for damages under RLUIPA growing out of the refusal by prison authorities to allow plaintiff to keep prayer beads, prayer oil, prayer clay and a skull cap.
In Jones v. Walker, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31387 (WD TX, March 17, 2009), a Texas federal district judge adopted a magistrate's recommendation and dismissed an inmate's claims that prison officials failed to follow state policies on confiscating and destroying a "contraband" prayer rug and providing rotation of pork-free substitutes and pork-free holiday meals.
KATV News reports that in a case on remand from the 8th Circuit (see prior posting), a Tennessee federal district judge has awarded an inmate damages of $625 for violation of his free exercise rights. Plaintiff was required to clean his cell on Saturday mornings in violation of his observance of the Sabbath.
In Bailey v. Rubenstein, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32192 (SD WV, April 15, 2009), a West Virginia federal district court accepted a magistrate's recommendation and dismissed a claim by a Native American inmate that prison restrictions on smoking infringed his free exercise rights and his rights under RLUIPA.
In Blount v. Echols, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108397 (WD AK, Sept. 4, 2008), an Arkansas federal magistrate judge rejected defendant's motion for summary judgment and permitted a Mormon inmate to move ahead with his challenge to prison rules that allow detainees to have only one religious book while in lock-down.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Court Says Fallen Eruv Wire Is Not A Known Dangerous Condition
In Egar v. Congregation Talmud Torah, (NY Sup. Ct., April 16, 2009), a New York state trial court dismissed a claim by a victim of a slip-and-fall accident that a group of synagogues should be liable for her injuries because she tripped over a fallen wire that was part of an eruv maintained by the defendants. The eruv (a symbolic enclosure within which observant Jews may carry items on the Sabbath) ran through the property of St. John's Episcopal Hospital's teaching center where plaintiff fell. Plaintiff claimed that defendants had constructive notice that the eruv constituted a dangerous condition because a year earlier an eruv wire had fallen in a different location. The court disagreed, saying that a "single incident of the eruv falling a year before this incident certainly does not constitute evidence of a regularly recurring condition of which defendants must be aware." [Thanks to YY Landa for the lead.]
Radical Cleric In Pakistan Returns To Red Mosque To Push For Shari'a Nationally
Time Magazine yesterday reports on another victory in Pakistan for those who favor imposition of Islamic law in the country. Radical cleric Abdul Aziz has been released on bail by Pakistan's Supreme Court after it ruled that there was insufficient evidence to hold him on charges of inciting violence. He had originally been arrested in 2007 after a week-long confrontation between government authorities and clerics from the Red Mosque-- including Aziz-- who had set up a religious court to enforce Islamic law. A day after his release, he returned to the pulpit at Islamabad's Red Mosque, preaching a sermon promising to continue to fight to establish Shari'a (Islamic law) throughout the country. (See prior related posting 1, 2.)
Growing Trend For Churches To Locate In Commercial Space
Newspapers from two separate states report on a growing phenomenon-- churches locating in commercial areas. Sometimes zoning officials see this as a problem because the tax exempt institutions are taking property that might be tax producing. Elsewhere, however, planners see this as creating a promising economic partnership. Yesterday's Galesburg (IL) Register-Mail says that many Illinois churches, looking to expand at lower cost than constructing new buildings, are relocating to closed big-box stores and auto service centers that they remodel to meet their needs. Today's Tyler (TX) Morning Telegraph reports that in cities like Conroe and Tyler, Texas, the many churches relocating to downtown areas have brought increased vitality to the commercial districts. Church goers have extra parking on Sundays, while workers during the week have expanded parking in church lots. Planners also see the potential for downtown restaurants to serve church-goers. Architect Don Mabry says that churches are the largest owners of real estate in downtown Tyler, attracting more people downtown than any single business does.
Yemen's Parliament Investigating Handling of Qur'an Desecration Complaints
Yemen Post reported today that Yemen's Parliament has set up a special committee to investigate what procedures the Interior Ministry follows when it receives a report charging desecration of the Qur'an. The action comes after a group of private citizens took matters into their own hands when police did not respond to a complaint charging a man with tearing and stepping on a copy of the Qur'an. Last Tuesday, a group of private citizens gathered from a number of mosques after morning prayers and went to the house of the alleged offender where they broke in, burned the furniture inside as well as two cars parked at the house.
Cert. Petition Filed In Illinois "Choose Life" License Plate Case
A petition for certiorari was filed with the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday in Choose Life Illinois, Inc. v. White. Yesterday's Christian Post reports that the petition for review was filed by the Thomas More Society after the 7th Circuit refused to grant en banc review in the case. A 3-judge panel of the 7th Circuit last November upheld Illinois' refusal to issue a special "Choose Life" license plate after after proponents obtained the requisite number of signatures requesting it. (See prior posting.)
UPDATE: Here is the full text of the petition for certiorari.
UPDATE: Here is the full text of the petition for certiorari.
Justice Thomas On Religion and His Court Duties
Last Monday's New York Times reported on comments made by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas at a dinner sponsored by the Bill of Rights Institute honoring winners of a high school essay contest. Answering questions submitted in advance in writing by students, at one point Thomas said:
how can you not reminisce about a childhood where you began each day with the Pledge of Allegiance as little kids lined up in the schoolyard and then marched in two by two with a flag and a crucifix in each classroom?Asked how his religious faith influences his work on the court, he responded:
I think that it really gives content to the oath that you took. You say, "So help me God."... There are some cases that will drive you to your knees.... In those moments you ask for strength and wisdom to have the right answer and the courage to stand up for it. Beyond that, it would be illegitimate, I think, and a violation of my oath to incorporate my religious beliefs into the decision-making process.[Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]
Friday, April 17, 2009
Coach Can Proceed With Discrimination Claim Against Jewish School
In Flynn v Rabbi Haskel Lookstein Middle School of Ramaz, (NY Sup. Ct., April 14, 2009), a New York state trial court held that Kevin Flynn, the former coordinator of athletics for a New York Jewish day school, stated a prima facie case of religious discrimination and could proceed to discovery. In the case, Flynn, one of only a handful of non-Jewish faculty at the school, says he was treated less favorably than Jewish faculty. The complaint alleges that an administrator referred to Flynn as having a "hot Irish temper," and that Flynn was the only faculty member required to attend anger management training. The complaint also alleges that discrimination was the underlying motivation for Flynn's eventual termination. The court however dismissed Flynn's claims for wrongful termination, defamation and various contractual claims.
Group Charges FBI Is Asking Muslims To Monitor Mosques
The Council of Islamic Organizations of Michigan has written Attorney General Eric Holder asking him to investigate complaints against the FBI. Reportedly agents are asking Muslims to give information on people attending mosques and the donations they make. Time reported yesterday that in particular, people with pending immigration issues are being approached by the FBI with offers of help in exchange for their monitoring mosques.
Georgetown Explains Covering of Religious Symbols For Obama's Speech
President Barack Obama delivered a speech (full text) at Georgetown University on Tuesday. According to The Hoya yesterday, the University has explained that: "In coordinating the logistical arrangements for the event, Georgetown honored the White House staff's request to cover all of the Georgetown University signage and symbols behind the Gaston Hall stage in order to accommodate a backdrop of American flags, consistent with other policy speeches." The "IHS" monogram-- a symbol of Jesus' name-- located directly behind the podium was covered with a piece of wood painted black.
An article in today's Philadelphia Evening Bulletin explains further that the drape placed at the rear of the stage was not high enough to fully cover the IHS and cross above the university seal, so, according to a University spokesman "it seemed most respectful to have them covered so as not to be seen out of context." However Patrick Reilly, president of The Cardinal Newman Society, said: "It is such a sad commentary that Catholic universities are willingly hiding the most visible signs of their Catholic identity when hosting secular leaders."
An article in today's Philadelphia Evening Bulletin explains further that the drape placed at the rear of the stage was not high enough to fully cover the IHS and cross above the university seal, so, according to a University spokesman "it seemed most respectful to have them covered so as not to be seen out of context." However Patrick Reilly, president of The Cardinal Newman Society, said: "It is such a sad commentary that Catholic universities are willingly hiding the most visible signs of their Catholic identity when hosting secular leaders."
Oklahoma Passes Bill On Use of Historical Religious References In Classrooms
The Oklahoma state Senate on Wednesday passed by a vote of 40-7 a bill that had already been approved by the House (in an 88-5 vote) which will permit public schools to use religious references from a wide array of historical documents in classrooms and school events. HB 1756 lists 9 types of historical documents that may be utilized, including presidential speeches and published records of Congress. It then provides:
School districts shall not limit or restrain instruction in American or Oklahoma state history or heritage based on religious references in documents, writings, speeches, proclamations, or the materials described in subsection B of this section. These and any other materials shall be used for educational purposes only and not to establish or promote any religion.Wednesday's Tulsa World, reporting on the Senate vote, quoted Sen. Clark Jolley, the Senate sponsor of the bill, who said it will allow teachers to discuss the religious context of historical documents like the Mayflower Compact and the Declaration of Independence. However Sen. Johnnie Crutchfield, who is also a teacher, said that the bill's passage was motivated by politics and is an "answer in search of a problem."
Conviction For Killing Unborn Child Does Not Violate Establishment Clause
Sanders v. State of Texas, (TX App., April 2, 2009), is an appeal by defendant who was convicted of capital murder for causing the death of Angela Alex and her unborn child. The Texas Penal Code prohibits intentionally and knowingly causing the death of any "individual", and defines "individual" as including "an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth." (Sec. 1.07). In affirming appellant's conviction, the Texas appellate court held that this definition of "individual" does not violate the Establishment Clause. It rejected appellant's argument that the definition amounted to an endorsement of religious groups that believe life begins at conception. The court said that the definition furthers the state's legitimate secular interest in protecting unborn children from the criminal act of others.
San Francisco College Changes Speaker Rules In Settlement of Jews for Jesus Case
A consent judgment (full text) has been issued in Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. City College of San Francisco, (ND CA, April 15, 2009). The settlement grew out of a lawsuit challenging the college's requirement that speakers and those handing out flyers obtain a permit. Plaintiff, an employee of Jews for Jesus, was arrested for repeatedly handing out literature on campus without a permit. The court had denied a preliminary injunction in the case in January, finding that rule changes made the 1st Amendment challenge moot. (Full text of decision). This week's settlement provides that the college will adopt those changes that apparently have already been made in its rules. They allow individuals to speak and distribute literature in designated areas by merely notifying the student activities office of their presence on campus. Yesterday's Christian Post , as well as an ADF release, report on the case.
Today Religion Clause Is 4 Years Old
Today is Religion Clause's 4th birthday. I want to thank all my long time readers and welcome those who have joined us more recently. I appreciate the leads that many of you e-mail to me and I apologize that I am not able to separately acknowledge each one. I do read them all and use as many as I can.
This month Religion Clause reached two milestones: it passed the 8,000 mark for the number of postings, and the site meter which records the number of visits since the blog began passed the half-million mark. Over 45% of those visits were recorded in the past 12 months.
With the change in Administrations in Washington, the flow of material for Religion Clause has not slowed. "Blog years" are even longer than "dog years." So I enter year 5 along with all of you, a bit older, hopefully a bit wiser, and with appreciation to you for making Religion Clause such a widely recognized source for objective information and primary source material on church-state and free exercise developments.
Today Is "Day of Silence" In Schools-- Focuses On LGBT Bullying
In schools across the country, today is "National Day of Silence"-- designed to call attention to anti-LGBT name-calling, bullying and harassment in schools. Christianity Today surveys three rather different recommendations on how Christian high schoolers should respond. A college psychology professor, Warren Throckmorton, suggests that Christians can participate to make schools safe without altering their views on sexuality. He wants them to carry cards in school today referencing the Golden Rule. The Illinois Family Institute disagrees, urging parents to take their children out of school for the day so they will not be "complicit in the exploitation of the classroom for partisan political purposes." Alliance Defense Fund wants Christian students to participate in a counter-event on April 20-- the "Day of Truth." Students will wear T-shirts and pass out cards urging gay students to explore changing their sexual orientation.
Court Says Statute Protects Church Property Sought For Use As Sidewalk
In City of Jordan v. Church of St. John the Baptist of Jordan, (MN Ct. App., April 14, 2009), a Minnesota Court of Appeals interpreted a Minnesota statute that protects churches from certain takings by eminent domain. Minn. Stat. § 315.42 prohibits state and local governments from taking land of any religious corporation by eminent domain for use as streets or roads unless the religious organization's board of trustees approves. The court held that this prohibition also applies to taking of church land to use for sidewalks or for traffic signals. Reporting on the decision yesterday, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune says that the case "carried huge symbolic weight for many in Jordan worried that Scott County's hypergrowth was ripping into the fabric of a historic downtown."
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Missouri Baptist Convention Loses Again In Suit To Get Control of Windermere
The Missouri Baptist Convention has suffered another loss in its attempt to regain control of the valuable Windermere Baptist Conference Center that broke away from the Convention (along with 4 other institutions) in a dispute over the fundamentalist stance of new MBC leaders. According to ABP, on April 9 a Camden County (MO) Circuit judge dismissed a suit challenging the legality of changes that Windermere made in its articles of incorporation in 2001. The judge said that the issues are the same as those posed in a companion lawsuit that was decided by the state court of appeals in February. In that case, the appellate court held that the amendments taking away MBC's power to elect Windermere trustees were validly adopted. The April 9 dismissal leaves fraud charges against one defendant pending, at least for the time being.
Colorado High Court: Catholic Eldercare Facility Not Entitled To Tax Exemption
In Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado v. City of Pueblo Department of Finance, (CO Sup. Ct., March 30, 2009), in a 4-3 decision, the Colorado Supreme Court held that the sales and use tax exemption in the City of Pueblo's tax code does not apply to Villa Pueblo, an elderly care community operated by the non-profit group Catholic Health. The court concluded that Villa Pueblo is not a "charitable organization" as that term is defined in the city's tax code. It rejected Catholic Health's contention that all religious organizations with 501(c)(3) status should be exempt, saying that this would put secular organizations engaged in similar activities at a competitive disadvantage. The court held that city's exemption is consistent with the Establishment Clause because it furthers a broad secular purpose. Finally it concluded that imposition of a sales or use tax on a religious organization does not violate the Free Exercise clause.
In an opinion by Justice Eid, three judges dissented. They argued that the majority interprets the exemption to apply to religious organizations only if they provide all services free of charge, while nonreligious charities are entitled to the exemption even if they charge some fees, so long as they operate at a loss. "The City has thus applied its tax code in such a way that discriminates against religious organizations in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution."
In an opinion by Justice Eid, three judges dissented. They argued that the majority interprets the exemption to apply to religious organizations only if they provide all services free of charge, while nonreligious charities are entitled to the exemption even if they charge some fees, so long as they operate at a loss. "The City has thus applied its tax code in such a way that discriminates against religious organizations in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the United States Constitution."
Canadian Court Clears Sikh Youth Charged With Assault
Today's Toronto Star reports that a Canadian teenager in Montreal's youth court was cleared of assault charges after a finding that religious and nationality differences played a part in the case. The youth, a Sikh, was accused by two classmates of threatening them with the pin he used to tuck his hair under his turban and poking one of them with his kirpan that was wrapped in a cloth under his clothing. The incident took place during a lunch break. (See prior posting.) Youth court judge Gilles Ouellet said that technically there was sufficient evidence to convict on the hairpin charge, but the judge gave the boy an unconditional discharge saying: "If the three boys had the same nationality, and the same faith, this case would not have ended up before the court."
Preliminary Injunction Granted In Challenge To Grade School Religious Music
In S.D. v. St. Johns County School District, (MD FL, April 15, 2009), a Florida federal district court granted a preliminary injunction barring an elementary school from directing students to rehearse or perform the Diamond Rio band's song (via YouTube), "In God We Still Trust." Third graders had been told that if they did not wish to practice the song for their upcoming assembly, they could not appear at all in the program. Finding that it was likely plaintiff would prevail on his Establishment Clause challenge, the court said:
The challenged song is not a sacred example of a choral music used to instruct students in music theory and appreciation. It is a modern, American county music song overtly espousing a specific religious viewpoint and attacking of those who do not share in the same belief. Additionally, the song degrades the doctrine of governmental separation and neutrality towards the promotion of religious ideologies.The preliminary injunction was entered even though the school had withdrawn the song from this year’s assembly. Today's St. Augustine (FL) Record reports on the decision. (See prior related posting.)
Macedoia's Constitutional Court Strikes Down Religious Instruction In Grade Schools
Makfax reported yesterday that Macedonia's Constitutional Court has struck down a provision in Macedonian law that allowed religious instruction in grade schools. Article 26 of the Law on Elementary Education stated: "religious instruction can be studied in the primary schools as a subject of personal choice." The court found the provision inconsistent with Macedonia's Constitution.
FLDS Defendants Challenge Search Warrants Used In Ranch Raid
In El Dorado, Texas yesterday, attorneys for ten indicted members of the FLDS Church filed motions in state court to suppress evidence that came from searches of the sect's YFZ Ranch last year. The highly publicized raids also led to the state’s taking temporary custody of some 439 children that lived on the FLDS compound in Sleicher County (TX). (See prior posting.) Identical 61-page motions challenging the validity of two search warrants were filed yesterday on behalf of each of the defendants who are charged with a number of offenses, including sexually abusing children. They argue:
[T]he authorities used a hoax phone call as an excuse for staging a massively intrusive raid upon a disfavored religious group…. Under the guise of looking for a man they knew was not there and a child that did not exist, the Texas authorities conducted a general search to see what they could find.Today's Deseret News and San Angelo (TX) Standard-Times report on the motions.
Identities of Those Rejected As Ambassador To Vatican Disclosed [Corrected]
Earlier this month, it was reported that the Vatican had rejected three names put forward as the possible nominee for U.S. ambassador to the Holy See. Yesterday the London Times disclosed the identity of two of the three whose views made them unacceptable to Vatican officials: Caroline Kennedy and law professor Douglas Kmiec. [An earlier version of this posting made reference incorrectly to a third name-- which came from my misreading of the Times report-- thanks to a Commenter for the heads up.]
Cuba Withholds Visas From USCIRF Delegation
Last Monday, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom announced that the government of Cuba has prevented a USCIRF delegation from visiting by withholding visas. The trip, which had been planned for many weeks, was intended to include meetings with various religious groups and with Cuban government officials to discuss freedom of religion in Cuba. The Cuban government offered no explanation and did not set an alternative date for the delegation’s visit. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Public School Courses From Kabbalah Center Draw Criticism
In Los Angeles, church-state questions are being raised by a Spirituality for Kids course that is being offered at nine elementary schools and three community sites. Today's Los Angeles Times reports that the course was developed by Karen Berg, who leads the Los Angeles Kabbalah Centre, with her husband, Rabbi Philip Berg. While Kabbalah is a traditional form of Jewish mysticism, the Kabbalah Center website claims that the organization is non-religious. The school classes do not mention "kabbalah", but use terms common in the Kabbalah Centre's programs. In one class, teacher Jenna Zucker and a facilitator wore the knotted red strings often used in kabbalah to ward off the "evil eye." Supporters say the public school course is a spirituality program that uses language common to many faiths. Others however are more skeptical. Orthodox Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein says the program does not belong in public schools. [Thanks to Patrick S. O'Donnell for the lead.]
School Board Grants Grooming Exemption For Native American High Schooler
The Somerset (TX) Independent School District Board of Trustees voted Monday to grant an exemption from the district's grooming policy for high schooler Jesus Figueroa. Today's Houston Chronicle reports that the vote came after a judge had ordered school officials to permit the boy to return to the classroom while his case was being litigated. Figueroa is a P'urhépecha Indian from Mexico. He believes his hair is a gift from the Great Spirit and should be cut only to mourn the death of a loved one. Apparently the boy initially claimed an exemption based on free expression grounds. The school board was more amenable to granting an accommodation once the claim was based on religious grounds and Figueroa's parents filed a document with the court indicating that they are Native Americans.
Tangipahoa Parish School Board Adopts Minor Changes In Policy On Invocations
Today's Baton Rouge (LA) Advocate reports that the Tangipahoa Parish (LA) School Board has made minor modifications in its policy on invocations preceding Board meetings. A lawsuit is pending against the Board broadly challenging its invocation policy which is based on a Model Policy developed by the Alliance Defense Fund. (See prior posting.) That challenge is set to go to trial in federal court on June 1.
The changes made at last Thursday's meeting-- largely at the urging of ADF-- provide that congregations can request to be added to the Board's list of potential invitees to deliver an invocation, and in case of a question about whether the religious organization is bona fide, the Board will rely on the IRS list of exempt organizations. The amendments also provide that students or others called on to deliver the Pledge of Allegiance, the national anthem or the preamble to the Constitution at a Board meeting are not required to attend the invocation. Students will be introduced after the invocation and the call to order of the meeting to prevent pressure on them to attend board-sponsored prayers.
The changes made at last Thursday's meeting-- largely at the urging of ADF-- provide that congregations can request to be added to the Board's list of potential invitees to deliver an invocation, and in case of a question about whether the religious organization is bona fide, the Board will rely on the IRS list of exempt organizations. The amendments also provide that students or others called on to deliver the Pledge of Allegiance, the national anthem or the preamble to the Constitution at a Board meeting are not required to attend the invocation. Students will be introduced after the invocation and the call to order of the meeting to prevent pressure on them to attend board-sponsored prayers.
Tajikistan Islamic Leader Resigns From Parliament In Protest of Religion Law
In Tajikistan, Muhammadsharif Himmatzoda, spiritual leader of Tajikistan's Islamic Revival Party, has resigned his seat in Parliament. Taiwan News reports today that the resignation came in protest of the country's new Religion Law. The controversial law was signed by Tajikistan's president last month. (See prior posting.)
Vermont's Gay Marriage Law Contains Strong Religious Exemptions
Last week, Vermont's legislature overrode the veto of Gov. Jim Douglas and became the fourth state to authorize same-sex marriages. As the Burlington Free Press reported last week, this is the first time that gay marriage has been approved legislatively, rather than by the courts. Largely uncommented upon until an article in today's New York Daily News are the strong religious freedom exemptions included in the new law (full text of S. 115).
Statutory provisions on who may solemnize marriages were amended to include this provision:
Statutory provisions on who may solemnize marriages were amended to include this provision:
[18 VAA Sec. 5144(b): ] This section does not require a member of the clergy ... to solemnize any marriage, and any refusal to do so shall not create any civil claim or cause of action.The provisions of Vermont's Banking and Insurance law relating to Fraternal Benefit Societies was amended to include the following:
[8 VSA Sec. 4501(b):] The civil marriage laws shall not be construed to affect the ability of a society to determine the admission of its members ... or to determine the scope of beneficiaries..., and shall not require a society that has been established and is operating for charitable and educational purposes and which is operated, supervised, or controlled by or in connection with a religious organization to provide insurance benefits to any person if to do so would violate the society’s free exercise of religion, as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution of United States or by Chapter I, Article 3 of the Constitution of the State of Vermont.Finally, the law amended Vermont's provisions banning discrimination in public accommodations to include the following:
[9 VSA Sec. 4502(l):] Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a religious organization, association, or society, or any nonprofit institution or organization operated, supervised, or controlled by or in conjunction with a religious organization, association, or society, shall not be required to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges to an individual if the request for such services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges is related to the solemnization of a marriage or celebration of a marriage. Any refusal to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges in accordance with this subsection shall not create any civil claim or cause of action.
This subsection shall not be construed to limit a religious organization, association, or society, or any nonprofit institution or organization operated, supervised, or controlled by or in conjunction with a religious organization from selectively providing services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges to some individuals with respect to the solemnization or celebration of a marriage but not to others.
Court Upholds Jury's RLUIPA Verdict and Constitutionality of RLUIPA
In Rocky Mountain Christian Church v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, Colorado, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30623 (D CO, March 30, 2009), a Colorado federal district court upheld a jury verdict handed down last year under RLUIPA in favor of Rocky Mountain Christian Church. Rejecting defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law, the court found that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that the county violated the equal terms, substantial burden and unreasonable limitations provisions of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act in denying the church's special use application. In a lengthy decision, the court also upheld RLUIPA against an Establishment Clause challenge and a claim that the statute exceeds Congress' enforcement authority under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment.
In a companion decision issued the same day, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30614, the court issued a permanent injunction requiring approval of the church's 2004 special use application. However the court refused to issue an injunction barring the county from imposing any further substantial burden on the church's religious exercise, finding that an injunction merely broadly ordering obedience to the law is impermissible. (See prior related postings 1, 2.)
In a companion decision issued the same day, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30614, the court issued a permanent injunction requiring approval of the church's 2004 special use application. However the court refused to issue an injunction barring the county from imposing any further substantial burden on the church's religious exercise, finding that an injunction merely broadly ordering obedience to the law is impermissible. (See prior related postings 1, 2.)
Roy Moore Likely To Run For Alabama Governor
CQ Politics reported yesterday that former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore says he is very "inclined" to enter the race for Alabama Governor in 2010. Moore was removed as state chief justice in 2003 after he refused to comply with a federal court order to take down a large 10 Commandments monument that Moore had placed in the State Judicial Building. Moore, currently the head of Foundation for Moral Law, told the AP in an interview Saturday that he would make a formal announcement of his intentions on June 1. Moore lost the Republican primary for Alabama governor in 2006.
Pakistan's President Signs Approval of Islamic Law In Swat Valley Area
BBC News and The Hindu report that Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari on Monday signed Nizam-e-Adl Regulation 2009, implementing Islamic law in the Malakand division of the Northwest Frontier Province. The signing followed passage of a resolution by Parliament's lower house, the National Assembly, urging Zardari to approve the regulation. Malakand is comprised of six districts, including the Swat valley. The regulation was part of an arrangement agreed to in February between the NWFP government and the Tehrik-e-Nifaz-e-Shariah Muhammadi, a group of religious hardliners, who in exchange got local Taliban to call a truce in the region. (See prior posting.) Instead of immediately signing the controversial arrangement, President Zardari put it before Parliament in order to develop a national consensus.
Health Care Facility Settles Suit Alleging Shaving of Sikh Man
In Westchester County, New York, a medical care facility has settled a lawsuit filed by the family of an Alzheimer's patient, an elderly Sikh man, whose beard, eyebrows, and mustache were cut by a nurse who had not been trained to understand the patient's religious preferences. Global Sikh News yesterday reported that the suit alleged free exercise violations as well as a claim for assault and battery. The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division had also begun an investigation into the matter. The settlement involves training of hospital staff to avoid similar issues in the future for other patients, as well as payment of $20,000 in damages to the family of now-deceased patient Pyara Singh. As part of the settlement, the hospital agreed to adopt United Sikhs' Guidelines for Hospital Admittance and Care/Extended Care for Sikhs as part of its nursing department orientation.
Lebanese Begin To Use New Right To Have Religion Removed From ID's
In Februrary, Lebanon's Interior Minister issued a circular permitting any citizen to have his or her religious affiliation removed from Civil Registry Records. (See prior posting.) According to today's Daily Star, the Union of Lebanese Democratic Youth urged people to use last Saturday as a day to request removal of affiliation from their ID's, and over 200 did so. It is expected that next, someone whose identity was removed will challenge the country's sectarian electoral law by attempting to run for Parliament. The Electoral Law restricts parliamentary candidates in various districts to members of a particular religious sect.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Organization of Islamic Conference Creates New Human Rights Commission
Al Arabiya reports that The Organization of Islamic Conference met at its headquarters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia yesterday to create a new OIC Human Rights Commission. The 57-member OIC will seek assistance from the U.N.'s Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights and the Geneva Institute for Human Rights in setting up its new independent Commission. OIC Secretary-General Eklemeddin İhsanoğlu said that the new Commission will: "promote tolerance, and fundamental freedoms, good governance, the rule of law, accountability, openness, dialogue with other religions and civilizations, the rejection of extremism and fanaticism, and the strengthening of the sense of pride in the Islamic identity." He also sid that this step would promote intellectual and political reform in OIC countries. OIC members also discussed "refining" the 1990 Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam.
Sikh Group Wants Army To Accommodate Turbans, Unshorn Hair and Beards
Tomorrow the Sikh Coalition will begin a campaign to convince the U.S. Army to permit Sikhs to serve in the military while wearing a turban, unshorn hair and a beard. Announcing the campaign, the Sikh Coalition said that currently Sikhs are required to choose between their religion and military service. In January, the Coalition sent a lengthy letter (full text) to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates urging him to accommodate the religious needs of a Sikh doctor and a Sikh dentist who were recruited during their first years in medical and dental school respectively, but whose ability to serve while maintaining their Sikh identity is now being questioned. An online petition is available to call on the military to allow Captain Kamaljit Singh Kalsi and Second Lieutenant Tejdeep Singh Rattan to serve with their turbans, unshorn hair and beards intact. [Thanks to Michael Lieberman for the lead.]
Murder Suspect's Husband Criticizes Police For Bareheaded Mugshot
In Orland Park, Illinois, police have arrested 26-year old Nour Hadid on charges of beating her 2-year old niece to death over a four day period, according to Friday's Southtown Star. Prosecutors say she has confessed to the crime. However Nour's husband, Alaeddin Hadid, says his wife is innocent and that police have insulted their Muslim religion by releasing a mug shot of his wife without her head covered. Police say that Nour's headscarf was given back to her after the mug shot was taken, but the headscarf was later taken away from her after she made suicide threats.
Modified EU Draft Directive on Discrimination Raises Concerns
Sunday's London Telegraph reports on changes that were made this month by the European Parliament in the EU Anti-Discrimination Directive that was drafted last year by the European Commission. The directive bans discrimination in offering of goods and services. This month's amendments eliminated exemptions for organizations based on religion and belief. Critics say this means that Christian churches might be sued if they refuse to give communion, baptism or membership to non-Christians trying to get their children into a church school. It could bar current policies under which church schools give priority in admission to members of their faith. And some say it could lead to gays and lesbians demanding weddings in churches. The draft directive now goes to the European Council, where each EU country is represented. Meanwhile the Church of England plans to raise concerns about the draft with the British government.
Recent Prisoner Free Excercise Cases
In Ortiz v. Downey, (7th Cir., April 1, 2009), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the district court should not have dismissed prior to discovery a Catholic inmate's claim that he was denied a rosary and prayer booklet in violation of his free exercise rights.
In Babcock v. Clarke, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26896 (ED WA, March 31, 2009), a Washington federal district court rejected plaintiff's free exercise, RLUIPA and equal protection claims. Plaintiff objected to authorities' refusal to permit her to attend school programming using her religious name that she adopted in 1993 and that, she says, was mandated by God when she was studying both Wicca and Noahide. Plaintiff asserts that forcing her to use her committed name is "incongruous of her religious beliefs, and debilitating her by undoing years of psycho-therapy for transsexualism."
In Mitchell v. Wiley, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26945 (D CO, March 31, 2009), a Colorado federal district court adopted a federal magistrate's recommendation and dismissed an inmate's objections to prison rules that grant access only to publications that come directly from the publisher or approved vendors, as well as policies that restrict inmate access to publications considered inmate-to-inmate correspondence, and an alleged ban on congregational prayer of two or more Muslim prisoners. Plaintiff had argued that the policies violated his free exercise rights and his rights under RLUIPA. Among the publications sought by plaintiff was a Muslim newspaper, "The Final Call."
In Jones v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26736 (D SC, March 30, 2009), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a federal magistrate's recommendation and rejected defendant's objections to an inmate educational program, finding that plaintiff's amended complaint did not adequately allege Establishment Clause, RLUIPA or Sourth Carolina Religious Freedom Act claims.
In Sweeper v. Taylor, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27318 (ND NY, March 27, 2009), a New York federal district court rejected an inmate's free exercise claim, finding that he was not disciplined for praying with 6 other inmates during Ramadan, but instead for refusing to obey an order.
In Gallagher v. Shelton, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27778 (D KS, March 31, 2009), a Kansas federal district court rejected free exercise and equal treatment claims by a Jewish inmate who claimed his requests for accommodation and religious items for specific Jewish holidays were denied or honored after the fact, and that he was subjected to an antisemitic comment and prejudicial treatment because of his religion.
In Horacek v. Derrick, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27605 (ED MI, March 30, 2009), a Michigan federal district court permitted plaintiff, who was a Jewish pre-trial detainee, to move ahead with a claim that he was not adquately provided with kosher food. However the court rejected plaintiff's objections to the requirement that he not wear a yarmulke outside of his cell.
In Babcock v. Clarke, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26896 (ED WA, March 31, 2009), a Washington federal district court rejected plaintiff's free exercise, RLUIPA and equal protection claims. Plaintiff objected to authorities' refusal to permit her to attend school programming using her religious name that she adopted in 1993 and that, she says, was mandated by God when she was studying both Wicca and Noahide. Plaintiff asserts that forcing her to use her committed name is "incongruous of her religious beliefs, and debilitating her by undoing years of psycho-therapy for transsexualism."
In Mitchell v. Wiley, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26945 (D CO, March 31, 2009), a Colorado federal district court adopted a federal magistrate's recommendation and dismissed an inmate's objections to prison rules that grant access only to publications that come directly from the publisher or approved vendors, as well as policies that restrict inmate access to publications considered inmate-to-inmate correspondence, and an alleged ban on congregational prayer of two or more Muslim prisoners. Plaintiff had argued that the policies violated his free exercise rights and his rights under RLUIPA. Among the publications sought by plaintiff was a Muslim newspaper, "The Final Call."
In Jones v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26736 (D SC, March 30, 2009), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a federal magistrate's recommendation and rejected defendant's objections to an inmate educational program, finding that plaintiff's amended complaint did not adequately allege Establishment Clause, RLUIPA or Sourth Carolina Religious Freedom Act claims.
In Sweeper v. Taylor, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27318 (ND NY, March 27, 2009), a New York federal district court rejected an inmate's free exercise claim, finding that he was not disciplined for praying with 6 other inmates during Ramadan, but instead for refusing to obey an order.
In Gallagher v. Shelton, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27778 (D KS, March 31, 2009), a Kansas federal district court rejected free exercise and equal treatment claims by a Jewish inmate who claimed his requests for accommodation and religious items for specific Jewish holidays were denied or honored after the fact, and that he was subjected to an antisemitic comment and prejudicial treatment because of his religion.
In Horacek v. Derrick, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27605 (ED MI, March 30, 2009), a Michigan federal district court permitted plaintiff, who was a Jewish pre-trial detainee, to move ahead with a claim that he was not adquately provided with kosher food. However the court rejected plaintiff's objections to the requirement that he not wear a yarmulke outside of his cell.
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Afghan Law Recognizing Shiite Beliefs Raises Protest From Women's Rights Advocates
Yesterday's Washington Post reports on the furor that has been ignited over a new law in Afghanistan that was supposed to have been the vehicle to recognize the religious beliefs of the country's minority Shiites. However the law has been widely denounced by human rights activists, Western governments and some Afghan cabinet members. The new law:
codifies proper behavior for Shiite couples and families in the most intimate detail. It requires women to seek their husband's permission to leave home, except for "culturally legitimate" purposes such as work or weddings, and to submit to their sexual demands unless ill or menstruating.Sima Samar, a Shiite woman who chairs the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, said:
That was supposed to be an achievement: to recognize Shias' legal rights so Hanafi [Sunni] laws would not be imposed on them. But it was also used by a few leaders who want to put chains around half the population.
Court Orders Discovery On Equal Access Act Claim
In Youth Alive v. Hauppauge School District, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29017 (ED NY, April 6, 2009), a New York federal district court dismissed as moot most of the claims asserted by two high school students regarding difficulties in organizing and operating a Bible club at their school. The court found that the school had responded to most of plaintiffs' claims under the 1st and 14th Amendments and the federal Equal Access Act (20 USC Sec. 4071). A controversy remained however over the school's failure to provide a paid advisor for the club, called Youth Alive. The court concluded that discovery is necessary as to this claim. At issue is the interpretation of a provision of the Equal Access Act that provides it shall not be construed to authorize school districts to "expend public funds beyond the incidental cost of providing the space for student-initiated meetings." Defendants claim this precludes them from furnishing a paid advisor, even though they are furnished to other non-religious groups.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)