New Trial Motion By Defendants Convicted In Amish Beard-Cutting Case Is Denied

In United States v. Mullet, (ND OH, Dec. 6, 2012), an Ohio federal district court denied a motion for a new trial by Bergholz Amish leader Samuel Mullet, Sr. and his co-defendants who were convicted in September of conspiring to violated the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act in connection with beard- and hair-cutting attacks against a rival Amish group. (See prior posting.) The court rejected Mullet's argument that there was insufficient evidence to link him to the attacks, saying:

While it is true Defendant did not physically participate in any of the attacks, there was extensive evidence showing he was a member of the conspiracy the object of which was to commit them.... Defendant, as Bishop of Bergholz, ran his community with an iron fist—nothing of significance happened without his knowledge and approval.  Even if the Government proved nothing more than that Samuel Mullet, Sr., was told about the attacks in advance by his followers and then said or did nothing to stop or prevent them, or even voice his disapproval, a jury could conclude that he had joined the conspiracy.... 

The court also rejected Mullet's argument regarding newly discovered evidence and his objections to evidence presented at trial of an AP article, and of his sexual relationship with one of his daughters-in-law.  AP reports on the decision.

First Family Lights National Christmas Tree

USA Today reports that last night, President Obama, along with First Lady Michelle Obama and their daughters, lit the White House National Christmas Tree on the Ellipse. In his comments at the ceremony, Obama focused on families in the Northeast who were displaced by Hurricane Sandy. After pushing the button to light the tree, the First Family left the stage and sat in the audience to watch entertainment by Jason Mraz, Ledisi, James Taylor, Kenny "Babyface" Edmonds, Colbie Caillat and American Idol winner Phillip Phillips.

UPDATE: The full text of the President's remarks at the National Christmas Tree Lighting are now available from the White House.

Judge Charged With Improper Sale of Religious Material In Courthouse

The Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission on Wednesday filed a Notice of Formal Charges (full text) against Leon County Judge Judith Hawkins for using her judicial position to sell religious books and materials through her for-profit business, Gaza Road Ministries. Photos on her business' website show her in her judicial robes. The formal charges in part also allege:

you have sold or attempted to sell your books, study guides, and other publications in the Leon County courthouse, in the parking garage of the courthouse, in your Chambers, and even in the Courtroom in which you preside. The purchasers of your books and other publications include attorneys who regularly appear before you and court staff.  There is a disparity in authority between your position and those to whom you have sold within the courthouse.

You use your Leon County email account, your Judicial Assistant, and your office spaces and equipment within the Leon County Courthouse to create, edit and promote the products you have for sale through Gaza Road Ministries....

Your involvement with Gaza Road Ministries has caused you to devote less than your full time and full attention to your judicial duties....

AP reports on filing of the charges.

Additional Hate Crime Reporting Categories May Be Added To FBI Form

Sikh News Network reported Wednesday on efforts being made to add three additional sub-categories to the FBI's "Hate Crime Incident Report" data collection form to track anti-Sikh, anti-Hindu and anti-Arab/ anti-Middle Eastern hate crimes. Sikh advocacy groups have particularly been pressing for the changes as attacks on Sikhs have multiplied. On Oct. 18, civil rights and community relations agencies presented a recommendation to the Uniform Crime Reporting Subcommittee of the FBI Advisory Policy Board that these changes be made. The recommendation (with additional input from interested parties) will be considered by the full Advisory Policy Board at its meeting in Spring 2013 and will likely be approved by the FBI director in June 2013. The FBI will then need to revise the form, obtain approval of the revisions from the Office of Management and Budget, and modify systems to enable the data collection. If all of this goes as planned, it is likely that data collection using the revised categories would begin in 2015.

Street Preachers Keep Access To Holiday Festival For 2012

In December 2011, a Minnesota federal district court granted a preliminary injunction to prevent Duluth police officers from interfering with activities of two street preachers at the Bentleyville Tour of Lights.  The Tour is a holiday festival held each year on city property, Bayfront Festival Park, and is sponsored by a private non-profit group. (See prior posting.)  This year the city of Duluth negotiated a new contract with the sponsor of the Tour, under which the sponsor is granted exclusive use of the Park for the event. The city argued that this moots the 2011 preliminary injunction and permits the sponsor to exclude the street preachers.  In Jankowski v. City of Duluth, (D MN, Dec. 5, 2012), the court disagreed, refusing to vacate the original preliminary injunction saying:

... the City cannot change a traditional public forum by its own ipse dixit.... Because the Park is a traditional public forum, and because this year’s BTL event is free and open to the public despite the fact that the 2012 Agreement grants BTLI “exclusive use” of the Park, the Court finds that the Park has retained its public character during the 2012 BTL event.... [G]ranting exclusive use of the Park to BTLI has no impact on Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.

However, the court refused to hold defendants in contempt because of ambiguity in the language of the original preliminary injunction, instead issuing a new modified injunction to cover future Festivals. Alliance Defending Freedom issued a press release announcing the court's decision. Duluth News Tribune reports on the decision.

Ousted Deacons and Their Supporters, Seeking To Attend Church, Sue Pastor

Saginaw News yesterday reported on a lawsuit filed in state court in Saginaw County, Michigan by 5 former deacons and two other members of the Zion Missionary Baptist Church who support them.  Plaintiffs complain that the church's pastor, Rodrick Smith, invoking state trespass laws, falsely told police he had fear that they would disrupt services.  Smith got police to threaten plaintiffs with arrest if they continued to attend church services. In the case of one member, police did arrest him for trespass, but never filed formal charges. Plaintiffs include a former Saginaw mayor and two Saginaw County commissioners. They have not attended services since, but have carried protest signs in front of the church on Sunday mornings.  The recently-filed complaint (full text) in Robinson v. Smith, (MI Cir. Ct., filed 11/29/2012), recounts Smith's attempt to remove 5 of the plaintiffs as deacons, and asks for a declaratory judgment that plaintiffs may attend church so long as they do not disrupt services.  It alleges that "Smith injected the secular police powers of the state into the internal affairs" of the church by means of wrongful use of the criminal trespass law, in violation of their 1st Amendment rights. The complaint also seeks damages for malicious prosecution. A suit against the church itself was dismissed by the court in October. That suit, similarly complaining about actions against plaintiffs, had sought return of nearly $130,000 in tithes the plaintiffs had given the church over the past 6 years.

Supreme Court Asked To Bypass 9th Circuit To Review Nevada Same-Sex Marriage Case

On Wednesday, the Coalition for the Protection of Marriage filed a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court asking it to take the unusual step of reviewing the district court decision in Sevcik v. Sandoval before the case is briefed, argued or decided by the 9th Circuit. (Full text of certiorari petition.)  In the case, a Nevada federal district court upheld Nevada's ban on same-sex marriages, rejecting an Equal Protection Clause challenge to the law. (See prior posting.) The certiorari petition essentially argues that this is a better case for the Supreme Court to use in deciding basic constitutional issues on same-sex marriage than are the other cases which the Court is currently considering for possible review. Dale Carpenter at Volokh Conspiracy discusses the Cert. petition and predicts the court will not grant review in the case.

Report On Enhancing Accountability of Religious Organizations Released

The Commission on Accountability and Policy for Religious Organizations this week issued its first report to Sen. Charles Grassley. The Commission was set up by the Evangelical Council for Financial Responsibility after the Senate Finance Committee in 2011 released a staff review of the activities of media-based ministries. (See prior posting.)  This week's 94-page report titled Enhancing Accountability for the Religious and Broader Nonprofit Sector, sets out numerous recommendations on compensation, accountability and IRS practices. The Chronicle of Philanthropy yesterday summarized some of the recommendations, saying that the report rejects federal efforts to impose new laws or regulations on religious organizations.

West Point Cadet Resigns Over School's Promotion of Religion

In a Huffington Post essay on Monday, West Point cadet Blake Page announced that he is resigning from West Point 5 months short of graduation in protest of the school's promotion of religion. He wrote in part:

... [C]ountless officers here and throughout the military are guilty of blatantly violating the oaths they swore to defend the Constitution. These men and women are criminals, complicit in light of day defiance of the Uniform Code of Military Justice through unconstitutional proselytism, discrimination against the non-religious and establishing formal policies to reward, encourage and even at times require sectarian religious participation. These transgressions are nearly always committed in the name of fundamentalist evangelical Christianity. The sparse leaders who object to these egregious violations are relegated to the position of silent bystanders, because they understand all too well the potential ramifications of publically expressing their loyalty to the laws of our country.

AP reported yesterday that  despite Page's concerns to the contrary, he has now received an honorary discharge and will not have to reimburse the military for the cost of his education. A spokesperson for West Point disputed Page's claims, saying that prayer is voluntary where invocations are offered, and that Page served as president of the school's Secular Student Alliance. Page had recently been disqualified on medical grounds from receiving a Second Lieutenant commission after graduation. He suffers from clinical depression and anxiety which have gotten worse since his father committed suicide last year.

EEOC Sues UPS Over Failure To Accommodate Jehovah's Witness New Hire

The EEOC announced that last week it filed a religious discrimination lawsuit against United Parcel Service, Inc. for its failure to accommodate a newly-hired Jehovah's Witness employee. The employee wanted either to start a  different day, start later than his scheduled time on his start date, or be given an hour's leave during his shift on his first day so he could attend the Memorial of Christ's Death, an  annual Jehovah's Witness religious service. UPS rejected his request and fired him when he attended the service instead of reporting for work.

Contraceptive Coverage Challenge By NY Archdiocese Survives Standing and Ripeness Challenge

In Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York v. Sebelius, (ED NY, Dec. 5, 2012), a New York federal district court permitted the Archdiocese of New York, the Catholic Health Care System (ArchCare) and Catholic Health Services of Long Island to proceed with their 1st Amendment, RFRA and Administrative Procedure Act challenges to the contraceptive coverage mandate imposed under the Affordable Care Act.  The court rejected standing and ripeness challenges to their lawsuits.  It held that the temporary enforcement safe harbor for non-profits with religious objections does not prevent plaintiffs from establishing imminent injuries. The announced review that may lead to changes in the coverage mandate for organizations with religious objections does not assure that changes will be made, and in any event costs are already being incurred in planning for possible compliance with the mandate or payment of fines for noncompliance.  The court however dismissed claims by the Diocese of Rockville Centre and Rockville Centre Catholic Charities because it appears that their health care plans are grandfathered and thus not covered by the challenged mandate. Reuters reported on the decision.

Couple Convicted For Mistreatment of Lamb Purchased For Religious Sacrifice

The Colorado Springs Gazette reports that on Tuesday, an El Paso County, Colorado state court jury convicted Periz Jackson and Elijah Black on animal cruelty charges for the confined and unsanitary conditions under which they kept a lamb they had purchased to sacrifice on Passover. Prosecutors charged defendants, who face a sentence of up to 18 months in jail and a $5000 fine, failed to feed and water the lamb. The couple, who are members of the largely African-American Hebrew-Israelite sect, planned to slaughter and roast the lamb in accordance with the ritual description in the Biblical book of Exodus. The lamb, discovered by the couple's landlord, was seized by the Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region.  Defendants say they intend to sue for federal civil rights violations because the government's actions prevented them from carrying out their religious obligations on their first Passover together as man and wife.

ACLU Files Complaint Against Judge Who Sentenced Teen To Church As Part of Probation

The Oklahoma ACLU has filed  a complaint with the state's Council on Judicial Complaints against Muskogee County District Judge Mike Norman over the judge's inclusion in a probation arrangement for a 17-year old of a requirement that he attend church for ten years. The sentence came after Tyler Alred plead guilty to manslaughter in the death of his friend who was riding with him in an alcohol-related auto crash. Apparently the defendant has no objections to the probation conditions. (See prior posting.) In a press release announcing the filing of the complaint, the Oklahoma ACLU's legal director said: "Acts of worship should come from a freely-made choice to adopt a faith, not from the government giving its citizens an ultimatum to sit either in a pew or a prison cell." The Tulsa World today reports on the ACLU's action.

3rd Circuit Upholds School Board's Refusal To Submit Religious Content Issues To Voters

The U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the Camden (NJ) Board of Education's refusal to include three proposed non-binding referendum questions on a special election ballot. In Torres v. Davis, (3d Cir., Dec. 4, 2012), the court rejected free speech, free exercise and equal protection challenges to the refusal by the Board of plaintiff's requests made over a ten-year period to place items on the ballot.  Two of plaintiff's proposals dealt with adding religious content to the public schools' curriculum. In various years, he also urged allowing prisoners to vote in school board elections and a proposal regarding prayer.

Indiana Legislator Wants To Require Science Teachers To Prove Truth of Their Teachings

In Indiana, state senator Dennis Kruse, chairman of the Senate Education and Career Development Committee, says he will try a new approach now that he failed last session to get legislation to allow the teaching of creationism along with evolution in the public schools. According to the Indianapolis Star yesterday, Kruse will introduce what he calls a "truth in education" bill.  As the senator describes the proposal: "If a student thinks something isn't true, then they can question the teacher and the teacher would have to come up with some kind of research to support that what they are teaching is true or not true."

Miami-Dade Commission Re-institutes Opening Prayer

In Florida yesterday, the Miami-Dade County Commission voted 8-3 to re-institute prayer before the opening of the Commission's formal meetings.  The Miami Herald reports that the vote comes after an intensive 18-month lobbying effort by the Christian Family Coalition to bring back prayers instead of the moment of silence that replaced the invocation in 2004. Commissioners will rotate in choosing someone to lead the prayer, or lead it themselves. The invocation must be non-denominational, and will be offered before the roll call of commissioners. During debate on the bill, the commissioners agreed to the rotation format, instead of having the county clerk compile a database of local religious leaders to choose from which would have cost $26,000 to implement. The ACLU said that if the prayers turn out to be sectarian, it will file suit.  However, Anthony Verdugo, executive director of the Christian Family Coalition, said the vote ended "8½ years of discrimination."

Judges Disagree About Constitutionality of California Sexual Orientation Change Efforts Ban

This week, two federal district court judges in the Eastern District of California, in two separate cases, reached opposite conclusions about the constitutionality of  California's new law (effective Jan. 1, 2013) totally banning mental health care providers from engaging in efforts to change the sexual orientation of anyone under under 18 years of age.  In Welch v. Brown, (ED CA, Dec. 3, 2012), Judge William Shubb entered a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the Sexual Orientation Change Efforts legislation against the three plaintiffs who were challenging it in that case. He concluded that the law is a content-based regulation of speech subject to strict scrutiny:

Especially with plaintiffs in this case, it is ... difficult to conclude that just because SOCE utilizing speech is a type of treatment, that the treatment can be separated from a mental health provider’s viewpoint or message....  Duk is a Catholic and, with patients that share his faith, he discusses tenants of the Catholic faith, including that “homosexuality is not a natural variant of human sexuality, it is changeable, and it is not predominantly determined by genetics.”  ... Similarly, Welch has explained that he shares the views of his church that homosexual behavior is a sin and that SB 1172 will “disallow [his] clients from choosing to execute biblical truths as a foundation for their beliefs about their sexual orientation.”

However, in Pickup v. Brown, (ED CA, Dec. 4, 2012), Judge Kimberly J. Mueller refused to grant a preliminary injunction to prevent the law from taking effect.  She wrote in part:

Courts reaching the question have found that the provision of healthcare and other forms of treatment is not expressive conduct.... As SOCE therapy is subject to the state’s legitimate control over the professions,SB 1172's restrictions on therapy do not implicate fundamental rights and are not properly evaluated under strict scrutiny review, but rather under the rational basis test.

Liberty Counsel announced that it will file an appeal in the case.

Church-State Concerns Keeping Sandy-Damages Houses of Worship From Receiving FEMA Aid

The Forward reported this week that church-state concerns mean that synagogues in New York which were damaged by Hurricane Sandy are at this time seen as ineligible for FEMA assistance.  Other non-profits, including homeless shelters and soup kitchens sponsored by religious institutions, are eligible if they apply by Dec. 30. However the government is encouraging synagogues and other houses of worship to apply to FEMA and the Small Business Administration by Dec. 30 so they will have applications on file if ultimately it is decided that houses or worship do qualify for assistance.

Interview With Convicted Amish Beard-Cutting Attacker Published

The Daily yesterday published a long interview with Bergholz Amish sect leader Sam Mullet who was convicted in September on hate crime charges stemming from beard-cutting attacks on a rival Amish group. (See prior posting.) Mullet is in prison awaiting a January sentencing hearing. The interview, conducted at the Northern Ohio Correctional Center, is wide ranging. Summarizing the interview, The Daily said:

Over the course of several hours, [Mullet] described the challenges of adjusting to prison, his perspective on the beard-cutting attacks and life inside the breakaway Amish sect where he was accused of sexually preying on women and tormenting men with harsh punishments.

On the matter of the beard cuttings, Mullet told The Daily that he was wrongly convicted — that a group of his followers, including several of his children, hatched the scheme on their own.

Israeli Civil Court Asserts Jurisdiction Over Same-Sex Couple's Divorce

Jerusalem Post reported yesterday that a Tel Aviv Family Court has broken new legal ground by granting a divorce to a same-sex couple who had married in Canada but lived in Israel. In an earlier case, Israel's Supreme Court had ordered registration of these same-sex marriages. Normally under Israeli law, only religious courts have jurisdiction over divorces. However the rabbinical courts, which do not recognize same-sex marriage, had, at least so far, failed to rule in the case. The Tel Aviv court said that it would violate the couple's fundamental rights and liberties to prevent them from dissolving a marriage that the state had recognized.  The civil court held that it could exercise jurisdiction over divorces when the rabbinical courts failed to do so.

Turkey Fines TV Station For Insulting Religious Beliefs Through Broadcast of Simpsons Episode

In Turkey, the Supreme Board of Radio and Television (RTUK), the national broadcasting regulator, has fined Turkish broadcaster CNBC-E the equivalent of $30,000 (US) for broadcasting an episode of The Simpsons found to be insulting to religious beliefs. Today's London Telegraph reports that the offending episode is the Halloween special "Treehouse of Horrors XXII." Among other things, the episode shows the Devil serving coffee to God; God and the Devil appearing in human bodies; and the burning of the Bible.

Appeals Court Removes Court Martial Judge For Bias In Ft. Hood Shooter Case

As reported by the Washington Post yesterday, accused Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Hasan won a significant victory yesterday in his ongoing battle with a military judge who refuses to allow him to wear a beard during his murder trial. Hasan has asserted the refusal violates his rights to the free exercise of religion. (See prior related posting.)  In Hasan v. Gross, (Armed Forc. Ct. App., Dec. 3, 2012), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in a per curiam opinion not only held that there was insufficient evidence to show that Hasan's beard materially interfered with the court martial proceedings, but also held that court martial judge Gregory Gross should be removed from the case because of the appearance of bias.  The court said in part:

the decision to remove Appellant from the courtroom, the contempt citations, and the decision to order Appellant’s forcible shaving in the absence of any command action to do the same, could lead an objective observer to conclude that the military judge was not impartial towards Appellant.... [I]t could reasonably appear to an objective observer that the military judge had allowed the proceedings to become a duel of wills between himself and Appellant rather than an adjudication of the serious offenses with which Appellant is charged. Moreover, we are cognizant that the military judge and his family were present at Fort Hood on the day of the shootings.

The court also vacated Hasan's contempt convictions and the judge's order to forcibly shave him. It said: "We need not and do not decide if and how RFRA might apply to Appellant’s beard.  Should the next military judge find it necessary to address Appellant’s beard, such issues should be addressed and litigated
anew."

Chaplain Sues Church-State Activist For Defamation, Abuse of Process

Earlier this year, a Texas state trial court dismissed a suit brought by Mikey Weinstein, founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), against former Navy chaplain Gordon Klingenschmitt, contending that Klingenschmitt was conspiring to encourage violence against him through use of "imprecatory prayers." The court concluded that Weinstein had shown no connection between the prayers and the threats and vandalism suffered by his family. (See prior posting.) Last week, Klingenschmitt reciprocated, filing suit against Weinstein and MRFF in state court in New Mexico claiming defamation and malicious abuse of process. The complaint (full text) in Klingenschmitt v. Weinstein, (NM Dist. Ct.), alleges in part:

The factual assertion or implication that Klingenschmitt’s 2009 prayers somehow incited or caused unidentified others to commit acts of vandalism including “a swastika emblazoned on their home in New Mexico, animal carcasses left on their doorstep and feces thrown at the house,” is demonstrably false in that both Mikey and Bonnie Weinstein have admitted these acts of vandalism occurred in 2006, 2007 or 2008, and therefore could not have been caused by Klingenschmitt’s 2009 prayers....

Upon information and belief, the primary motive for Weinstein and Bonnie L. Weinstein to file the lawsuit against Klingenschmitt was an illegitimate end, specifically to cause Klingenschmitt or his interests financial difficulties, to prevent Klingenschmitt from promoting his philosophy or his religious beliefs, to marginalize Klingenschmitt’s influence, goals, and impact, and to subject Klingenschmitt to the expense, delay, and distraction of protracted litigation.

In a Dec. 2 press release, Klingenschmitt announced that Weinstein had been served in the lawsuit. God and Country blog reports on the lawsuit.

French Lawyer Fined, Faces Discipline, For Alleging Judicial Religious Bias Based On Jewish Name

Digital Journal reports that in Lyon, France last week, the Lyon Bar referred lawyer Alexis Dubruel for disciplinary proceedings after Dubruel sought disqualification of a judge because of the judge's Jewish name.  Dubruel, representing a grandmother seeking to obtain visitation rights to see her granddaughter, argued that Judge Albert Levy should be disqualified for lack of impartiality. According to Dubrel:

The presiding judge whose disqualification is sought has the surname "Levy". The "Papa" of the person in this case Miss X (...) had been prosecuted for the offence of taking away a minor under 18, is named Moses (Moïse). The first page of reference for the word "Lévy" on Wikipedia says that the word is, “according to tradition, the founder of the Jewish religion, Judaism, which is sometimes called, for this reason, Mosaic, that is to say, the religion of Moses. The materiality of these findings is incontestable.

The court denied Dubrel's motion and fined him 750 Euros. According to The Algemeiner, in an earlier hearing a client of Dubruel's felt she was unfairly treated and attributed it to Levy's bias in favor of a Jewish defendant. Judge Levy has previously been the subject of anti-Semitic attacks, including threats when he investigated the far-right Front National Party and his being placed under police protection when an Islamist group threatened him.

Appeals Court Says Amish Must Abide By Consent Judgment On Sewers

In Wagler v. West Boggs Sewer District, Inc., (IN App., Nov. 29, 2012), an Indiana appeals court refused to set aside consent judgments entered into by several members of an Old Order Amish community under which they are to connect to the public sewer system and install a grinder pump despite their religious beliefs that preclude using electricity from the public grid and being on a public utility sewer.

Recent Articles and Book of Interest

From SSRN (U.S. Law):

• Justin B. Richland, Hopi Tradition as Jurisdiction: On the Potentializing Limits of Tribal Sovereignty, (Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 36, No. 1, 201-234, Winter 2011).
• Dominic Draye, Baptizing the Fourteenth Amendment: Equal Protection and Religion, (August 30, 2011).
• Nicholas P. Cafardi, Saving the Preachers: The Tax Code's Prohibition on Church Electioneering, (Duquesne University Law Review, Vol. 50, p. 503, 2012).
• Robert A. Kahn, Karl Loewenstein, Robert Post and the Ongoing Conversation between Europe and America Over Hate Speech Laws, (U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-38, 2012).
• Eric Lane, On Madison, Muslims, and the New York City Police Department, (Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2012).
• Courtney G. Joslin, Marriage, Biology, and Federal Benefits, (Iowa Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Linda Sugin, The Great and Mighty Tax Law: How the Roberts Court Has Reduced Constitutional Scrutiny of Taxes and Tax Expenditures, (November 30, 2012).

From SSRN (Non-U.S. Legal Systems):

• Omar Salah, Legal Infrastructure of Sukuk Structures – Part 1, (TISCO Working Paper Series on Banking, Finance and Services No. 04/2012).
• Javaid Rehman and Eleni Polymenopoulou, Is Green a Part of the Rainbow? Sharia, Homosexuality and LGBT Rights in the Muslim World, (October 10, 2012).
• Juan Carlos Riofrio Martinez Villalba, El Derecho al Nombre de las Confesiones Religiosas (The Right to Religious Confession Name), (La Propiedad Inmaterial, No. 16, p. 77, 2012).
• Patrick McKinley Brennan, Subsidiarity in the Tradition of Catholic Social Doctrine, (Subsidiarity in Comparative Perspective, Michelle Evans and Augusto Zimmermann, eds., Springer, Forthcoming).
• Alan Greene, Natural Law and the Basic Norm of the Irish Constitution, ((2012) 30 (19) Irish Law Times 298-300).
• Shafi'i Abdul Azeez Bello, The Scope and Application of Wa' Ad, Muwa'Adah and Wa'Dan in Islamic Finance, (November 20, 2012).
• Renae Barker, The Full Face Covering Debate: An Australian Perspective, (University of Western Australia Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2012).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:

• Religious Freedom in a Pluralistic Age: Trends, Challenges, and Practices. Articles by Zaki Azmi, Jorge Adame Goddard, Jose Ferrer Sanchez, Syamsul Arifin, Gennadiy Druzenko, Brian J. Grim, Gregor Puppinck and Renata Uitz. 2012 Brigham Young University Law Review 689-967.
• Steven J. Heyman, To Drink the Cup of Fury: Funeral Picketing, Public Discourse and the First Amendment,  45 Connecticut Law Review 101 (2012).

New Book:

• Brian Leiter, Why Tolerate Religion?, (Oct. 28, 2012).

Federal Court Upholds Nevada's Ban On Same-Sex Marriage

In Sevcik v. Sandoval, (D NV, Nov. 26, 2012), a Nevada federal district court upheld against an Equal Protection Clause challenge the constitutionality of Nevada's ban on same-sex marriages. Nevada does recognize same-sex and opposite-sex domestic partnerships, with the parties having most, but not all, of the same rights and responsibilities as do spouses in a marriage. The court concluded that it need apply only rational basis scrutiny to Nevada's state constitutional provisions limiting marriage to heterosexual couples:

Here, there is no indication of any intent to maintain any notion of male or female superiority, but rather, at most, of heterosexual superiority or “heteronormativity” by relegating (mainly) homosexual legal unions to a lesser status....

The States are currently in the midst of an intense democratic debate about the novel concept of same-sex marriage, and homosexuals have meaningful political power to protect their interests. At the state level, homosexuals recently prevailed during the 2012 general elections on same-sex marriage ballot measures in the States of Maine, Maryland, and Washington, and they prevailed against a fourth ballot measure that would have prohibited same sex marriage under the Minnesota Constitution. It simply cannot be seriously maintained, in light of these and other recent democratic victories, that homosexuals do not have the ability to protect themselves from discrimination through democratic processes such that extraordinary protection from majoritarian processes is appropriate.

Applying rational basis scrutiny, the court concluded that "the protection of the traditional institution of marriage, which is a conceivable basis for the distinction drawn in this case, is a legitimate state interest."   The court also held that protection of Nevada's public policy is a valid reason for it to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.  AP reporting on the decision says that plaintiffs plan an appeal.

State Court Says Louisiana Voucher Program Violates State Constitution

In Louisiana Federation of Teachers v. State of Louisiana, (LA 19th Dist. Ct., Nov. 30, 2012), a Louisiana trial court held that the state's voucher program unconstitutionally diverts to nonpublic schools or entities funds which the state constitution's Minimum Foundation Program allocates to elementary and secondary public schools. The court said that its decision, however, does not foreclose "establishing educational programs that are funded outside the constitutional limitations of the Minimum Foundation Program...." Ponchartrain Newspapers reports more extensively on the testimony in the case, the decision and the reaction to it.

Raelians Ask UN Human Rights Council To Investigate Switzerland's Actions Against Them

Last week, the International Raelian Movement filed a Petition (full text) with the United Nations Human Rights Council asking it to investigate Raelian charges that Switzerland, conspiring with the Vatican, has misused the European Court of Human Rights to defame the Raelian movement.  The petition reads in part:

The honor and reputation of the entire leadership of a recognized worldwide religious movement has been intentionally defamed based on a manipulation of the facts by Judge Bratza of the European Court of Human Rights in a case involving Switzerland’s refusal to permit the inoffensive poster above to be displayed in public. Underlying this betrayal of justice by Judge Bratza was a conspiracy by Switzerland and the Vatican to bizarrely label the Raelian Movement leadership as pedophiles in retaliation for its stand against clerical pedophilia worldwide and in particular in francophone countries.

The European Court decision about which the Raelians complain is attached as an appendix to their petition. The Raelian Movement also issued a press release announcing the filing of their petition.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Finney v. Marshall, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167765 (ED TX, Nov. 27, 2012), a Texas federal magistrate judge dismissed as frivolous a complaint by a Mormon inmate that he was not allowed to take Sundays off from his job in the prison kitchen.

In Allen v. Hense, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168217 (ED CA, Nov. 26, 2012), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that on one day during his Administrative Segregation Unit confinement he was served the regular breakfast and sack lunch instead of his religious vegetarian meal.

In Heggem v. Holmes, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168935 (WD WA, Nov. 27, 2012), a Washington federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168936, Oct. 4, 2012) and dismissed an inmate's claims that the revocation of her alternative drug offender sentence involved retaliation because of her religious beliefs. Prior litigation had already rejected the same contentions.

In Lapine v. Vilgos, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170011 (WD MI, Nov. 27, 2012), a Michigan federal district court rejected free exercise retaliation and equal protection claims by a Native American inmate who had a disciplinary misconduct charge for threatening behavior filed against him after he disrupted religious services because he was upset over new limits on the smudging ceremony.

In Goodson v. Clark, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169906 (WD VA, Nov. 29, 2012), a Virginia federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that defendants told him that Satanism is not a religion recognized by the Department of Corrections and refused to allow him to order a Goat Head Star Amulet.

In Wall v. Wade, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170537 (WD VA, Nov. 30, 2012), a Virginia federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that his rights were violated when he (along with 183 others) was removed from the Ramadan participation list for not having Islamic materials to demonstrate his religious sincerity.

In Cloyd v. Dulin, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170100 (MD TN, Nov. 30, 2012), a Tennessee federal district court rejected a Muslim inmate's complaint that the prison's halal diet did not include real meat.

In Galdones v. Department of Public Safety, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169824 (D HI, Nov. 29, 2012), an Hawaii federal district court dismissed without prejudice various claims by an inmate of interference with his practice of his Native Hawaiian religion and related retaliation and due process claims.

In Goodman v. Ramey, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169264 (SD WV, Nov. 29, 2012), a West Virginia federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170527, May 17, 2012) and rejected an inmate's claim that his free exercise rights were violated when was disciplined for accepting a money order from the parents of another inmate who sent the money to thank him for being a "Christian brother" to their son.

Court Upholds Indiana's Marriage Solemnization Statute Over Objections of Secular Celebrant

In Center for Inquiry v. Clerk, Marion Circuit Court, (SD IN, Nov. 30, 2012), an Indiana federal district court rejected constitutional challenges to Indiana's marriage solemnization statute (IN Code 31-11-6-1).  Under the statute, clergy can obtain a license to solemnize marriages, but those certified as "Secular Celebrants" by the non-religious Center for Inquiry cannot.  The court said in part:

We conclude that the Solemnization Statute is rationally related to the legitimate purpose of alleviating significant governmental interference with pre-existing religious beliefs about marriage. Additionally, the statute bears a  rational relation to the equally reasonable purpose of allowing the government to assume responsibility for the marriage regulation function without ostracizing its religious constituents. For these and all of the reasons explicated above, we find that Plaintiffs' First Amendment claim-whether grounded in Free Exercise Clause or Establishment Clause jurisprudence-does not succeed on the merits.

The court likewise rejected plaintiffs' equal protection claim. In reaching its conclusions, the court pointed out:

there are several readily available avenues by which a Secular Celebrant may facilitate a marriage ceremony in Indiana: she may (1) preside at a wedding and then instruct the couple to go before one of the individuals listed in the Solemnization Statute to have the marriage solemnized; (2) become a member of the "clergy" by seeking immediate Internet ordination from the Universal Life Church; or (3) seek certification to solemnize marriages from the Humanist Society.

Federal Court Refuses To Order Trailer of "Innocence of Muslims" Taken Down From YouTube

As reported by AP, a federal court in Los Angeles on Friday refused to grant a preliminary injunction to actress Cindy Lee Garcia who appears in the controversial film "Innocence of Muslims" and wants the trailer for the film removed from YouTube.  Garcia claims she was deceived about the film's subject matter and that her voice was dubbed over after filming. Her federal lawsuit alleges copyright infringement.  In Garcia v. Nakoula, (CD CA, Nov. 30, 2012), the court held that even if Garcia owns a copyright in her performance in the film, she necessarily "granted the Film’s author a license to distribute her performance as a contribution incorporated into the indivisible whole of the Film."

Oregon High Court Rules That Parent Church Owns Property of Breakaway Presbyterian Congregation

In Hope Presbyterian Church or Rogue River v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), (OR Sup. Ct., Nov. 29, 2012), the Oregon Supreme Court held that the property of a break-away Presbyterian congregation belongs to PCUSA, the national church body.  The court concluded that it would use the "neutral principles" approach in determining the rights of the parties. Applying that approach, the court found that "Hope Presbyterian held its property in trust for the benefit of PCUSA."

Text Of Egypt's Proposed Constitution-- Provisions On Religion

The full text of Egypt's proposed new Constitution became available today in English from Egypt Independent. BBC News has also published a side-by-side comparison of key provisions in the new constitution and those in the now-suspended 1971 Constitution. Here are some of the provisions in the new draft Constitution relating to religion and religious liberty:

Article 1
. The Arab Republic of Egypt is an independent sovereign state, united and indivisible, its system democratic.
The Egyptian people are part of the Arab and Islamic nations, proud of belonging to the Nile Valley and Africa and of its Asian reach, a positive participant in human civilization.



Article 2. Islam is the religion of the state and Arabic its official language. Principles of Islamic Sharia are the principal source of legislation.



Article 3
. The canon principles of Egyptian Christians and Jews are the main source of legislation for their personal status laws, religious affairs, and the selection of their spiritual leaders.



Article 4
. Al-Azhar is an encompassing independent Islamic institution, with exclusive autonomy over its own affairs, responsible for preaching Islam, theology and the Arabic language in Egypt and the world. Al-Azhar Senior Scholars are to be consulted in matters pertaining to Islamic law.


The post of Al-Azhar Grand Sheikh is independent and cannot be dismissed. The method of appointing the Grand Sheikh from among members of the Senior Scholars is to be determined by law.

The State shall ensure sufficient funds for Al-Azhar to achieve its objectives.


All of the above is subject to law regulations.

...

Article 6.... No political party shall be formed that discriminates on the basis of gender, origin or religion.

...

Article 10. The family is the basis of the society and is founded on religion, morality and patriotism.


The State is keen to preserve the genuine character of the Egyptian family, its cohesion and stability, and to protect its moral values, all as regulated by law.....

Article 11. The State shall safeguard ethics, public morality and public order, and foster a high level of education and of religious and patriotic values, scientific thinking, Arab culture, and the historical and cultural heritage of the people; all as shall be regulated by law.

...

Article 43. Freedom of belief is an inviolable right.

The State shall guarantee the freedom to practice religious rites and to establish places of worship for the divine religions, as regulated by law.

Article 44. Insult or abuse of all religious messengers and prophets shall be prohibited....

Article 60.... Religious education and national history are core subjects of pre-university education in all its forms....

UPDATE: Another provision of interest is Article 219: "The principles of Islamic Sharia include general evidence, foundational rules, rules of jurisprudence, and credible sources accepted in Sunni doctrines and by the larger community."

Court Dismisses Challenge To City's Ban On Unattended Park Displays; Critics Plan Live Nativity Scene Instead

After denying a preliminary injunction earlier this month (see prior posting), a California federal district court this week in Santa Monica Nativity Scenes Committee v. City of Santa Monica, (CD CA, Nov. 29 2012) dismissed a challenge to a Santa Moncia (CA) ordinance that prevented a group from continuing the 60-year tradition of erecting a series Christmas story dioramas in Palisades Park during the holiday season. The court rejected plaintiff's contention that the City’s ordinance banning all unattended displays in Palisades Park violates the 1st Amendment's Free Speech and Establishment Clauses. Christian Post reported yesterday that a coalition of Christian groups plans to hold a Live Nativity Display in Palisades Park on Dec. 8. This is permissible since the city's ordinance bars only unattended displays.

British "Free Schools" Must Teach Evolution In Science Classes

In Britain, Free Schools are alternative state-funded schools set up in response to local demands. The first Free Schools opened in 2011. In January of this year, Britain's Department for Education revised its funding agreement for Free Schools to prevent the teaching of creationism in science classes, allowing it to be taught only in religious education classes. (The Guardian). Now, after pressure by the Royal Society as well as secular and humanist groups, the Department for Education has taken the next step.  Free Schools also may not omit evolution from their science curriculum. Instead, according to Thursday's Guardian, a new clause has now been placed in funding agreements with Free Schools requiring them to "make provision for the teaching of evolution as a comprehensive, coherent and extensively evidenced theory." The Department for Education has approved three Free Schools run by groups with creationist views, though only one of these schools has opened so far. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Egypt's Constituent Assembly Hurriedly Adopts New Constitution

Egypt's constituent assembly hurriedly completed its work on a new constitution yesterday. (Reuters). President Morsi has said that his controversial decrees that have sparked over a week of protest will end when the people vote on the constitution. CTV News reports that the new constitution, which contains over 230 articles, was adopted by an Islamist dominated body: "Of the 85 members in attendance, there was not a single Christian and only four women, all Islamists." Reuters describes the new draft as leaving the status of Islam unchanged, in that it keeps a provision making the principles of Islamic law the main source of legislation.  However it adds a new provision that the Sunni center of learning, Al-Azhar, must be consulted on "matters related to the Islamic sharia." Human Rights Watch offers this evaluation of the new document:

Article 43 on freedom of religion limits the right to practice religion and to establish places of worship to Muslims, Christians, and Jews. Previous drafts had provided for a general right to practice religion but limited the establishment of places of worship to adherents of these three Abrahamic religions. Article 43 discriminates against and excludes followers of other religions, including Egyptian Bahais. Under former President Hosni Mubarak, security forces would frequently arrest religious minorities including Shia, Ahmadis, Bahais, and Quranists because of their beliefs....

One positive development is that the final draft no longer includes what had been article 68 in earlier drafts on women’s rights, which stipulated that equality for women would be subject to conformity with rulings of Islamic law, a provision strongly promoted by Salafi members of the assembly. However, the draft no longer lists “sex” as one of the grounds for prohibiting discrimination, as no grounds are named. Article 30 now states that, “Citizens are equal before the law and equal in rights and obligations without discrimination,” without specifying whom this provision covers.

First Lady Conducts Preview Of White House Christmas Decorations

According to the White House website, on Wednesday First Lady Michelle Obama held a press preview of this year's White House Christmas holiday decorations. This year's theme is "Joy to All."  The White House features 54 decorated trees. Two rooms pay tribute to the sacrifices of the Armed Forces and their families. Children of military families attended the press preview. The 18-foot tall official White House Christmas tree in the Blue Room is trimmed with ornaments made by military children living on bases around the world.

Christian Proselytizers May Add Arab-American Chamber of Commerce As Sec. 1983 Defendant

In Acts 17 Apologetics v. City of Dearborn, (ED MI, Nov. 27, 2012), a Michigan federal district court ruled that the Arab-American Chamber of Commerce (AACC) may be added as a defendant in a 42 USC Section 1983 civil rights action brought against the city of Dearborn, its mayor and police officials by a Christian group whose purpose is to evangelize Muslims.  Members of the group, Acts 17 Apologetics, were acquitted on breach of the peace charges that had been filed against them for proselytizing at the Arab International Festival. (See prior posting.)  The Christian group then sued, alleging, among other things, a civil conspiracy to violate their 1st, 4th and 14th Amendment rights.  In allowing plaintiffs to file an amended complaint to add AACC as a defendant, the court held that a private party such as AACC could be found to be a state actor if it was jointly engaged with state officials in an action taken by the officials. American Freedom Law Center issued a press release announcing the decision.

Russian Court Says Pussy Riot Video Is Extremist and Must Be Removed From Websites

In Russia yesterday, the Zamoskvoretsky District Court in Moscow court ruled that four Internet videos of the punk rock group Pussy Riot are "extremist" and must be removed from a list of websites to which they have been uploaded. The best known of the videos is a montage of the group performing a prayer in punk rock form in Moscow's Christ the Savior Cathedral. The lyrics ask the Virgin Mary to "chase Putin out." (See prior posting.) Judge Marina Musimovich said the videos include "words and actions which humiliate various social groups based on their religion."  Financial Times and BBC News report on the decision. RAPSI has a transcript of the live blogging from the trial (Part 1, Part 2). An appeal of the decision may be filed within one month, however since the court has refused to permit the one Pussy Riot member who is not in jail to intervene as a party to the proceedings in this case, apparently she may not file an appeal. The only parties were the prosecutor and Russia's justice ministry.

Rev. Schuller Gets Only Limited Amounts In Crystal Cathedral Bankruptcy

In In re Crystal Cathedral Ministries, (CD CA Bkrpt., Nov. 26, 2012), a California federal bankruptcy court ruled on multi-million dollar claims against Crystal Cathedral by its former leader Rev. Robert H. Schuller and his wife Arvella Schuller. As reported by the Orange County Register, the court, in the Chapter 11 reorganization, allowed claims of $615,625 by Schuller for unpaid compensation, housing allowances and health care premiums.  The court allowed none of the claims by Schuller's wife.  The court disallowed Schuller's copyright infringement claims, finding, among other things, that Schuller's Hour of Power television program was a work for hire owned by Crystal Cathedral which was Schuller's employer. Claims by Schuller's daughter and son-in-law totaling $77,615 were also allowed. (See prior related posting.)

Group Has Standing To Sue Over Jesus Statue On Forest Service Land

In Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Weber, (D MT, Nov. 27, 2012), a Montana federal district court held that an advocacy organization has standing to bring an Establishment Clause challenge to the decision by the U.S. Forest Service to allow the continued presence of a statue of Jesus on National Forest Service land within Whitefish Mountain Resort. (See prior posting.) The court found standing because one of FFRF's members had standing to sue in his own right.  The court rejected defendants' motion to dismiss after FFRF filed an affidavit from one of its members who lives 15 miles from the statue who said he is a frequent skier at the resort; he has skied past the statue many times previously and intends to again this winter; and he is a non-believer who considers the statue religious in nature and offensive. AP reports on the decision.

Divided 8th Circuit Panel Issues Stay Pending Appeal In Contraceptive Mandate Case

The U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday, by a 2-1 vote, issued a stay pending appeal in O'Brien v. Department of Health and Human Services. (Full text of order.)  In the case, a Missouri federal district court rejected a series of challenges to the contraceptive coverage mandate of the Affordable Care Act brought by a small business organized as a limited liability company and by its sole owner who is Catholic. (See prior posting.) American Center for Law and Justice issued a press release applauding the 8th Circuit's action.

Texas Seeks To Seize FLDS Church's Compound

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott announced yesterday that his office has initiated legal proceedings in state court to seize as contraband the 1600-acre YFZ Ranch in west Texas that has functioned as a compound for the polygamous FLDS Church. According to Abbott, "the YFZ Ranch was purchased on the orders of Warren Jeffs, who sought a rural location where the FLDS could operate a polygamist compound where the systemic sexual assault of children would be tolerated without interference from law enforcement authorities." In 2008, a high profile raid on the ranch led to the removal of 415 children by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. (See prior posting.)  According to the Search and Seizure Warrant and the Affidavit supporting the warrant filed in state district court, the property "has been used in the commission of Texas Penal Code offenses of first and second degree felonies, including Sexual Assault, Bigamy, Money Laundering and Engaging in Organized Criminal Activity." AP reports on developments.

Egypt Convicts 8 Connected With "Innocence of Muslims" In Abstentia For Capital Crimes

In what may be largely a symbolic move, yesterday a court in Egypt convicted and sentenced to death in abstentia 8 individuals who are connected with the controversial film "Innocence of Muslims."  AP and NBC report on the convictions for "intentionally committing acts to harm the unity of the country and peace of its land;" "calling to divide the country into small states on a sectarian basis and harming national unity;" and "using religion to promote extremist ideas resulting in religious division and disrespect [of] heavenly religion."   The best known of those convicted are the film's producer Mark Basseley Youssef (also known as Eli Basily), and anti-Muslim Florida pastor Terry Jones. Also convicted were 6 other Coptic Christians-- two of whom work in the U.S. for the Coptic group Sadek that calls for an independent Coptic state; a priest who hosts TV programs from the U.S.; a lawyer living in Canada who has previously sued the Egyptian government over riots in 2000 that left 21 Christians dead; and a woman who converted to Christianity and is a critic of Islam.

Decisions involving capital punishment must be reviewed by the country's chief religious authority.  Also, defendants convicted in abstentia of a capital crime would be automatically entitled to an appeal, and thus a retrial, if they were to return to Egypt. Maximum sentences are common in Egypt in cases tried in abstentia.

Suit Challenges Village's Policy That Excludes Religious Programs In Community Rooms

Liberty Counsel, a Christian educational and advocacy group, announced yesterday that it has filed suit in an Illinois federal district court challenging Plainfield, Illinois' policy regarding use of its Community Rooms by outside groups.  The Policy (full text), while permitting a wide variety of meetings, programs and activities, excludes use of the rooms for a dozen specific types of activities including use for "Religious services or other religious purposes."  The complaint (full text) in Liberty Counsel, Inc. v. Village of Plainfield, Illinois, (ND IL, filed 11/28/2012), says that Liberty Counsel wishes to use a community room to present an educational program promoting a Christian view of the founding of America, but is precluded from doing so under the village's policy.  The group claims that this violates provisions of the 1st and 14th Amendments, as well as the Illinois Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Challenge To Contraceptive Coverage Mandate By Pittsburgh Diocese Dismissed On Ripeness and Standing Grounds

In Zubik v. Sebelius, (WD PA, Nov. 27, 2012), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed on ripeness and standing grounds a challenge by the the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, Catholic Charities of Pittsburgh and Catholic Cemeteries Association of Pittsburgh to the contraceptive coverage mandate issued under the Affordable Care Act. The court concluded that:

the safe harbor provisions of the regulation itself protects all of the Plaintiffs from any potential enforcement action until at least January 1, 2014.  Further, the health care plan offered by the Diocese, as well as three of the four health care plans offered by Catholic Cemeteries, share additional protection under the regulations insofar as they are each grandfathered under the ACA.... Defendants have committed to amending the preventive services coverage regulations well before January 2014 to accommodate the religious objections of organizations such as Plaintiffs.

Trib Total Media reports on the decision.

UPDATE: On Jan. 23, plaintiffs filed an appeal with the 3rd Circuit. (TribLive).

Suit Claims "Conversion Therapy" For Gays Violates State Consumer Fraud Act

The Southern Poverty Law Center announced yesterday that it has filed a first-of-its-kind lawsuit in state court in New Jersey on behalf of 6 plaintiffs seeking equitable relief and damages for fraud against an organization that offers "conversion therapy" to gay men.  Defendant is JONAH, Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing.  The complaint (full text) in Ferguson v. JONAH, (NJ Super Ct., filed 11/27/2012) alleges various violations of New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act. The Daily Beast reports in depth on the lawsuit.

Poland's Constitutional Court Bars Kosher and Halal Slaughter, But Decision Is Pre-empted By New EU Regulation

AP reports that Poland's Constitutional Tribunal yesterday held that Jewish and Muslim ritual slaughter of animals without first stunning them violates Poland's animal protection laws, and that the agriculture minister unconstitutionally exceeded his powers when he issued regulations in 2004 permitting kosher and halal slaughter.  AFP reports, however, that the ruling is largely symbolic because on January 1, 2013, European Union Council Regulation No. 1099/2009 creating uniform EU rules on animal slaughter goes into effect. That Regulation permits ritual slaughter without stunning so long as the slaughter takes place in a slaughter house.  January 1 is the same date on which the Polish court's ruling takes effect, so-- according to Poland's Agriculture Minister-- it will be immediately overriden by the EU rules. Animal rights activists say it is possible for Poland to request and exception from the regulation.  Poland is a leading exporter of kosher and halal meat to other European countries, last year exporting $259 million worth.

Appeals Court Reverses Denial of Name Change After Gender Reassignment

In In re Steven Charles Harvey, (OK Ct. Civil App., Nov. 20, 2012), an Oklahoma appeals court held that a trial court judge abused his discretion in denying Steven Charles Harvey, who was undergoing a sex change, the right to change his name to Christie Ann Harvey. The trial judge (full text of trial court opinion) had held that it would assist that which is fraudulent to allow the name change because "a sex change cannot make a man a woman or a woman a man." The trial judge argued this could lead to inadvertent or illegal same-sex marriage, or, in case of a crime, could lead police to ignore a female suspect because they had retrieved male DNA.  In support of his denial of the name change petition, the trial court judge quoted from the Biblical book of Genesis: "So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them...." and went on to say: "The DNA code shows God meant for them to stay male and female." The appeals court agreed with petitioner that there is nothing fraudulent in the use of a traditionally female name by one with male DNA. The Oklahoman reports on the appeals court decision.

Saudi-Backed Interreligious Center Opens In Austria

Yesterday, the inauguration ceremony marking the official opening of the King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue (KAICIID) was held in Vienna, Austria, the Centre's home base.  Among those speaking at the opening ceremony was U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon (full text of remarks). As reported by Reuters, KAICIID was launched by Saudi Arabia as an international organization with a multi-faith board to foster interfaith understanding and help deal with health crises. According to the Huffington Post, the Centre is backed by an international treaty signed by Austria, Spain and Saudi Arabia, with support from the Vatican. Saudi Arabia is funding the start-up costs and the first 3 years' budgets. Some in Austria, as well as some Saudi dissidents, are critical of the Centre, fearing that it will focus on the strict Wahhabi version of Islam. It is expected that the Centre's board will eventually hold a meeting in Saudi Arabia, which will pose the question of whether the nation will allow board member Rabbi David Rosen, who is an Israeli citizen, to attend.

Court Rejects Establishment Clause Challenge To Seizure of Funds

In Midamar Corp. v. United States, (ND IA, Nov. 19, 2012), an Iowa federal district court denied a motion by a company that is a leading supplier of Halal food to order release of $454,000 seized by the government from the company's bank account.  According to the Washington Post, the government is suggesting that the company improperly branded and sold meat products as meeting Muslim dietary requirements when that was not the case.  Rejecting the company's motion, the court said in part:

Next, Midamar argues that the court must quash the warrant because, according to Midamar, the government presumably intends to seek an indictment charging Midamar with fraud, and any fraud charges would require the court to define Halal, a religious term without an agreed-upon meaning, in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.  The court finds that such argument is unavailing.  Midamar cites no  authority in support of its contention that this is an appropriate basis to quash a warrant.  Moreover, such an argument is premature.  The government has not filed any charges against Midamar and, consequently, the court is without jurisdiction to consider the constitutionality of any potential fraud charges.

Priest's Conviction Was Based On Excessive Religious Evidence

In State of Minnesota v. Wenthe, (MN Ct. App., Nov. 26, 2012), a Minnesota appeals court held that the state's clergy sexual conduct statute is not facially invalid under the Establishment Clause.  However, the court upheld the as applied challenge to the law raised by a priest who had been convicted under it for having sex with a woman for whom he served as confessor. The court held that the conviction was invalid under the Establishment Clause because it was based on excessive religious evidence:

the religious evidence provided the jury with religious standards for judging appellant’s conduct.  It invited the jury to determine appellant’s guilt on the basis of his violation of Roman Catholic doctrine, his breaking of the  priestly vows of celibacy, and his abuse of the spiritual authority bestowed on Roman Catholic priests; additionally, the evidence invited concern about the response of church authorities to the victim’s complaint.

The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reports on the decision.

Supreme Court Sends Free Exercise Challenge To Affordable Care Act To 4th Circuit

Yesterday, in an unusual move, the U.S. Supreme Court revived a 4th Circuit case which challenges the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on 1st Amendment, 14th Amendment and RFRA grounds. In Liberty University v. Geithner, plaintiffs claim, among other things, that the ACA permits federal funding of abortions in violation of the free exercise clause and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. They also claim that the ACA violates the Establishment Clause and equal protection clause because the narrow religious exemptions in the Act favor certain religious adherents. The 4th Circuit dismissed the case, holding that the federal tax Anti-Injunction Act barred the lawsuit, and the Supreme Court declined to review that decision. Plaintiffs, however asked for a rehearing on the decision to deny review, since earlier this year, in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, the Supreme Court held that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar a challenge to the ACA.  Yesterday, the Supreme Court held (Order List, Docket No. 11-438):

The petition for rehearing is granted. The order entered June 29, 2012, denying the petition for a writ of certiorari is vacated. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius.

Liberty Counsel issued a press release applauding the court's action. Christian Science Monitor also reports on the court's action. (See prior related posting.)

NYT Discloses More Details On Making of Film "Innocence of Muslims"

Today's New York Times carries a front-page article revealing new details on Nakoula Basseley Nakoula and his making of the controversial film "Innocence of Muslims." A trailer for the film sparked demonstrations around the world. (See prior posting.) According to the Times:

The making of the film is a bizarre tale of fake personas and wholesale deception. And as with almost everything touched over the years by Mr. Nakoula — a former gas station manager, bong salesman, methamphetamine ingredient supplier and convicted con man — it is almost impossible to separate fact from fabrication.

Scotland Reports Data On Religiously Motivated Hate Crimes

On Friday, the Scottish government released a new report, Religiously Aggravated Offending In Scotland  2011-12. The Executive Summary says in part:

There has been an increase in the number of recorded religious aggravation charges in 2011-12 compared with previous years. For this report, 876 charges with a religious aggravation reported in 2011-12 were analysed, compared with 693 charges in 2010-11. This is an increase of 26%..... [T]his increase may be partly due to increased awareness, reporting and recording of these crimes....

Although the number of football-related charges rose in the last year by 16% (from 231 to 267) the proportion went down from 33% to 31% of charges. The number of charges occurring in football stadiums also decreased from 90 (13%) to 67 (8%). This reduction in charges may in part be explained by the increased focus on football-policing and supporter conduct through the work of the Joint Action Group on Football, established in 2011.

Roman Catholicism and Protestantism were most often the religions that were the subject of abuse. The proportional spread of the religions that were targeted was similar to the previous year: 57.7% in 2010-11 and 58.1% in 2011-12 for Roman Catholicism; and 36.5% in 2010-11 and 40.3% in 2011-12 for Protestantism.

Police officers were the most common target of religiously aggravated offending, in over half (51%) of all charges.

Swartzentruber Amish Group Moving From Pennsylvania To Upstate New York

AP reported Saturday that the 21-family congregation of Swartzentruber Amish who have lived in western Pennsylvania are moving to St. Lawrence County in upstate New York rather than continue their battles with local officials over sewage disposal codes. (See prior posting.) Land values in western Pennsylvania have been rising because of the Marcellus Shale natural gas boom.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• June Mary Makdisi, Application of the Principle of Totality and Integrity in American Case Law, (National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 2012).
• Avihay Dorfman, Freedom From Religion, (July 31, 2012).
• Gordon A. Christenson, 'Liberty of the Exercise of Religion' in the Peace of Westphalia, (Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 21, 2012).
• Michael  J.T. McMillen, Islamic Home Purchase Financing: A Conceptual Overview, (November 17, 2012).
• Marina Lostal Becerril, The Meaning and Protection of ‘Cultural Objects and Places of Worship’ under the 1977 Additional Protocols, (59 Netherlands International Law Review 3 (2012), pp. 455-72).
• Marina Lostal Becerril, Challenges and Opportunities of the Current Legal Design for the Protection of Cultural Heritage during Armed Conflict, (International Symposium on Cultural Heritage Protection in Times of Risk: Challenges and Opportunities. Yildiz Technical University, ICOMOS ICORP,. Istanbul (Turkey) 2012).
• Nicholas Hatzis, The Church-Clergy Relationship and Anti-Discrimination Law, (Ecclesiastical Law Journal, Forthcoming).
• Geoffrey P. Miller, Taxation in the Bible, (Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Law, Forthcoming).
• Farrah Ahmed and Jane Calderwood Norton, Religious Tribunals, Religious Freedom, and Concern for Vulnerable Women, (Child and Family Law Quarterly, Forthcoming).
• Mohammad Fadel, Seeking an Islamic Reflective Equilibrium: A Response to Abdallahi A. An-Na'im's Complementary, Not Competing, Claims of Law and Religion: An Islamic Perspective, (Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 39, p. 1257, 2013).
• Avishalom Westreich, Talmud Based Solutions to the Problem of the Agunah, (Agunah Research Unit Volume 4, Deborah Charles Publications, 2012).
• Frederick C. DeCoste, Hitler's Conscience, Redemptive Political Emotions, and the Politics of Fear, (November 23, 2012).

SSRN --from Erasmus Law Review Vol. 5, No. 1, 2012:

• Wouter De Been and Sanne Taekema, Religion in the 21st Century Debating the Post-Secular Turn.
• Veit Bader, Post-Secularism or Liberal-Democratic Constitutionalism?
• Markha Valenta, Pluralist Democracy or Scientistic Monocracy? Debating Ritual Slaughter.
• Ann-Sophie Vandenberghe, Regulating the Relationship between State and Religion: An Economic Approach.
• Kristin  A.M. Henrard, Duties of Reasonable Accommodation in Relation to Religion and the European Court of Human Rights: A Closer Look at the Prohibition of Discrimination, the Freedom of Religion and Related Duties of State Neutrality.
• Marlies Galenkamp, Locke and Bayle on Religious Toleration.

From SmartCILP:

• Amy Adler, The First Amendment and the Second Commandment, 57 New York Law School Law Review 41- 58 (2012/13).
• Alan Brownstein, Continuing the Constitutional Dialogue: A Discussion of Justice Stevens's Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Jurisprudence, 106 Northwestern University Law Review 605-656 (2012).
• Erwin Chemerinsky, A Fixture on a Changing Court: Justice Stevens and the Establishment Clause, 106 Northwestern University Law Review 587-603 (2012).
• Nicole Stelle Garnett, Are Charters Enough Choice? School Choice and the Future of Catholic Schools, 87 Notre Dame Law Review 1891-1916 (2012).
• Edward Whelan, The HHS Contraception Mandate vs. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 87 Notre Dame Law Review 2179-2190 (2012).

Britain's House of Lords Debates Role of Religion In Society

Last Thursday, Britain's House of Lords held a 90-minute debate on the role of religion in society in the United Kingdom. (Full text of the debate.) Lords from numerous faith traditions spoke. The concluding statement was made by Baroness Warsi, Minister for Faith and Communities, who said in part:

This Government believe that religion plays a vital role in British society. Not only do we support people in their right to follow a faith if they choose to do so; we also celebrate faith and faith communities' contribution to society...

Places of worship of different faiths in a town or city can sometimes be unaware of the work each is doing, often to address similar problems. The Government want to help build effective, co-operative working relationships between people of different faiths.... The Government are also happy to support A Year of Service, to highlight and link up faith-based volunteering efforts during Her Majesty the Queen's Diamond Jubilee year....

The Government are also committed to maintaining the status of religious education as a compulsory subject that all pupils must study throughout their schooling, subject to parental choice. Religious education is important so that children can understand the history that has shaped the values and traditions of this country, forming a key part of promoting the spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of children and young people.... The Government also remain committed to the provision of collective worship in schools-or, as I knew them, assemblies.

... UK has a strong Christian heritage.... Britain is proud of its established church and Europe must be more confident in its Christianity. It is therefore right that religious education reflects the fact that the religious traditions of Great Britain are in the main Christian. Last year, every state school in England was provided with a King James Bible to mark its 400th anniversary and recognise the huge influence it has had on our culture, language, society and values....

The noble Lord, Lord Curry, also raised concerns about the perceived marginalisation of Christians. I am in receipt of the Christians in Parliament All-Party Parliamentary Group report setting out these concerns, and we are currently considering a response to that....

This Government believe that faith should have a seat at the table in public life.... [T]his is not a position of privilege but that of a strong contributor to the public debate.... This Government have held faith receptions at Downing Street for major festivals: Vaisakhi, Eid, Hanukkah and Diwali-and, yes, it was right that this coalition Government introduced the celebration of Easter as well.

Preachers' Access To Tour of Lights Festival In Court Again

Last year, a Minnesota federal district court granted a preliminary injunction to prevent city of Duluth police officers from interfering with activities of two street preachers at the Bentleyville Tour of Lights-- a holiday festival held each year on city property, but sponsored by a private non-profit group. (See prior posting). This year, the city is attempting to limit the preachers to a new "First Amendment zone" created in a parking lot outside one of the entrances to the festival. According to the Duluth News Tribune, last Tuesday the preachers filed a new motion in federal district court again seeking an order that officials allow them inside the park during the Tour of Lights. The city, however, says it has negotiated a new contract with festival sponsors that allow them to set rules on who is allowed in the display.

UPDATE: Here is the full text of the motion to enforce the preliminary injunction and hold defendants in contempt.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Pouncil v. Tilton, (9th Cir., Nov. 21, 2012), an inmate challenged under RLUIPA prison officials' denial to him of conjugal visits with his second wife. The 9th Circuit had that the statute of limitations had not run on his claims despite the fact that he had earlier been denied conjugal visits with his first wife  pursuant to the same regulation.

In Cartwright v. Woody, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165122 (ED VA, Nov. 19, 2012), a Virginia federal district court dismissed an inmates complaint that inmates must sometimes place their names on a sign-up sheet to attend religious services, and that more Bibles than Qur'ans are available at the jail.

In Contreraz v. Adams, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165884 (ED CA, Nov. 19, 2012), a California federal magistrate judge refused to permit an inmate to proceed in forma pauperis  in his attempt to obtain a religious exemption from the prison's grooming requirements because plaintiff had brought at least 3 other suits that were dismissed as frivolous.

In McDaniel v. Lanigan, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166716 (D NJ, Nov.21, 2012), a New Jersey federal district court dismissed, with leave to amend, an inmate's claims relating to denial of Halal meals to Muslim inmates and denial to Jewish inmates of kosher milk, glatt kosher meals and wearing of the tallit, since it was not clear how any of these impacted plaintiff.

In Desper v. Ponton, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166546 (ED VA, Nov. 20, 2012), a Virginia federal district court dismissed an inmate's free exercise and RLUIPA challenges to a sign-up policy for religious services, and a policy discouraging transient offenders at reception centers from receiving publications, including Bible study materials.

In Williams v. Fluaitt, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166820 (ED WA, Nov. 21, 2012), a Washington federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166826, Oct. 31, 2012) and denied an inmate's request for a preliminary injunction because the relief requested (relating Ramadan meal request contracts and denial of separate Nation of Islam services) were unrelated to the complained violation (advance sign-up for Ramadan meals).

Settlement Allows Florida Christian College Students To Qualify For State Grant Program

A settlement was reached earlier this month in Florida Christian College v. Shanahan, a federal court challenge to Florida Christian College's exclusion from the Florida Resident Access Grant program. (See prior posting.) The state had contended that the school did not meet the "secular purpose" requirement for participation that is imposed by Florida law.  The Lakeland, Florida Ledger reported Friday that the settlement:

will allow four students who were named plaintiffs in the case to receive so-called FRAG grants during the spring semester of this academic year — and will admit the college into the program for the 2013-14 academic year.

Also, the settlement indicates the state Department of Education will revise the way it determines whether religious colleges qualify for the program, including getting rid of what was dubbed a "secularity checklist.

Alliance Defending Freedom issued a Nov. 15 press release reporting on the settlement, and also made available the full text of the Mediation Settlement Agreement.

Zimbabwe Supreme Court Orders Break-Away Anglican Bishop To Return Church Properties

AP reports that Zimbabwe's Supreme Court on Monday ruled that Anglican Church property in the country must be returned by break-away Bishop Nolbert Kunonga to the Anglican Province of Central Africa.  Kunonga was excommunicated in 2007 for inciting violence in sermons supporting President Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF Party.  Kunoga formed a new diocese and took over the Cathedral in Harare and other church property with the help of police. Kunoga says he left the Anglican Church because of its position on gay marriage. According to the Financial Gazette, the Anglican Province is undertaking an audit of returned properties to determine damage and missing items.

In Recently Released Opinion, Court Dismisses Damage Claim Against Proponents of Ground Zero Mosque

In Forras v. Rauf, (NY County Sup. Ct., Sept. 26, 2012) (a decision that was not made available until Nov. 20), a New York trial court dismissed plaintiff's suit to recover damages against defendant who proposed to construct a mosque and Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero in New York City.  Plaintiff, who leased nearby office space also used as a part-time residence, alleged nuisance, negligent infliction of emotional distress and assault. He claimed he suffered increased anxiety and fear due to Islamic rituals in one room  inside the building. The court found that many of the alleged injuries were the result of the attack on 9-11 and not because of the proposed mosque construction.