Sikh Court Opens in Britain

Religion Media Center reports that in England, the world's first Sikh court opened last Saturday. However, unlike Muslim and Jewish religious courts, Sikhism does not have its own legal code.

 According to the report:

The court [in London] was set up by Sikh lawyers who felt that secular judges lacked the religious and cultural expertise to deal with disputes between Sikhs. It will operate as an alternative forum for dispute resolution for UK-based Sikhs involved in family and civil disputes....

[Baldip Singh] aid its purpose would be “to assist Sikh families in their time of need when dealing with conflict and disputes in line with Sikh principles”....

[The court will] work within the remit of the Arbitration Act (1996), under which anyone — legally qualified or not — can sit as arbitrator so long as both parties agree to submit to the same set of rules....

At the first instance, Sikh court “magistrates” will mediate in disputes to try to negotiate a settlement, as well as directing court users to courses that can help them work on issues that have contributed to the dispute. These courses, developed with Sikh charities, cover low-level domestic violence, anger management, gambling and substance misuse and are available in Punjabi as well as English....

British Court Dismisses Libel Action By Sikh Leader

A High Court in Britain yesterday dismissed a libel action against free lance journalist Hardeep Singh brought by religious leader Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj. London's Press Gazette and Journalism.co report on the decision. Jeet Singh is the head of Nirmal Kutia Johal, a Nirmal Sikh institution. In an August 2007 article in the Sikh Times, Hardeep Singh accused Jeet Singh of being an impostor and leading a cult. He charged this disturbed the peace in the Sikh community of High Wycombe, promoted blasphemy and encouraged the abuse of women. The Sikh Times has already withdrawn the article and apologized. Hardeep Singh pled justification, fair comment and qualified privilege. The court dismissed the action saying that issues of a religious or doctrinal nature permeate the proceedings. The court would be required to interpret Sikh doctrine to determine whether the charges that Jeet Singh was an impostor were defamatory.

Sikh Group Wants Army To Accommodate Turbans, Unshorn Hair and Beards

Tomorrow the Sikh Coalition will begin a campaign to convince the U.S. Army to permit Sikhs to serve in the military while wearing a turban, unshorn hair and a beard. Announcing the campaign, the Sikh Coalition said that currently Sikhs are required to choose between their religion and military service. In January, the Coalition sent a lengthy letter (full text) to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates urging him to accommodate the religious needs of a Sikh doctor and a Sikh dentist who were recruited during their first years in medical and dental school respectively, but whose ability to serve while maintaining their Sikh identity is now being questioned. An online petition is available to call on the military to allow Captain Kamaljit Singh Kalsi and Second Lieutenant Tejdeep Singh Rattan to serve with their turbans, unshorn hair and beards intact. [Thanks to Michael Lieberman for the lead.]

Sikh Crime Victims In London Can Now Request Sikh Officer For Case

In Britain, London's Metropolitan Police have responded to cultural misunderstandings in criminal investigations by instituting a new program. Yesterday's BBC News reports that Sikh crime victims will now be able to request that a Sikh police officer be a part of the crime investigation. Palbinder Singh, chairman of the Metropolitan Police Sikh Association, said that in the past, serious crimes where Punjabi culture is an issue have not been properly investigated. The police department has also set up a website through which crimes can be reported so, for example, women who are prevented from making an unsupervised phone call, can report honor-based violence or forced marriage. Officials say that a similar program might be extended to other minority groups in the future, though some believe that a better approach would be greater training in cultural sensitivity for all officers.

Indian Government Drops Support For Law On Registering Sikh Marriages

According to The Link, India's government announced to Parliament this week that it is dropping a proposal long advocated by Sikhs to provide for separate registration of Sikh marriages. Legislation enacted in 1909 recognizes the validity of Sikh marriages, but provides no means of registering them. Registration must be effected either under the Hindu Marriage Act or the Special Marriage Act. Earlier this week, according to the Times of India, a U.S.-based Sikh advocacy group wrote the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief seeking United Nations intervention to pressure India to pass an act for registration of Sikh marriages.

Study Says Sikh Students In NY Face Harassment

Preliminary findings of a study released yesterday by the Sikh Coalition says that 58% of Sikh students in New York public schools have been victims of name calling, threats or physical abuse because of their religion. Summarizing the study, the New York Press says that school administrators have often failed to pursue complaints of discrimination filed by Sikh students. Release of the data follows a highly publicized incident last month in a Queens high school in which a student forcibly cut off the hair of his Sikh classmate. (See prior posting.)

No 1st Amendment Bar To Suit Over Board Seats In Two Sikh Dharma Entities

In Puri v. Khalsa, (9th Cir., Jan. 6, 2017), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, vacating the district court's dismissal, held that neither the ministerial exception doctrine nor the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine requires dismissal of a suit by the widow and children of the deceased spiritual leader of the Sikh Dharma faith alleging they are being frozen out of board positions in two nonprofit Sikh Dharma entities. In rejecting application of the ministerial exception doctrine, the court said in part:

[T]he pleadings do not allege the board members have any ecclesiastical duties or privileges. In assessing the responsibilities attendant to the board positions, it is relevant that the entities involved are not themselves churches, but rather corporate parents of a church. SSSC’s primary responsibility appears to be holding title to church property, and UI, in addition to being ... the direct corporate parent of the Sikh Dharma church – owns and controls a portfolio of for-profit and nonprofit corporations, including a major security contractor and a prominent tea manufacturer. Although the complaint alleges the board members have “fiduciary duties to UI and SSSC to hold assets in trust for the benefit of the Sikh Dharma community,” it is not clear on the face of the complaint that these duties are “religious” or “reflect[] a role in conveying the Church’s message and carrying out its mission.”

Turning to the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine, the court said:

Nothing in the character of th[e] defense will require a jury to evaluate religious doctrine or the ‘reasonableness’ of the religious practices followed . . . Under these circumstances, the availability of the neutral-principles approach obviates the need for ecclesiastical abstention.

Indian State Bans Private Publishing of Sikh Scriptures

In the Indian state of Punjab, the Cabinet this month agreed to the promulgation of an Ordinance to ban private publishing houses from publishing the Sikh scriptures, Sri Guru Granth Sahib. World Sikh News on Friday reported on developments. The new law will give a monopoly on publishing to the official Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC). The announcement has led Punjab’s oldest publisher, B. Chattar Singh Jiwan Singh, to stop its publication of the Sikh scriptures. The government acted after two relatives of Harbhajan Singh, the owner of the private publishing house, were dragged and beaten by hardliners who alleged that copies of the scriptures published by them were being transported in a way that was not in accord with Sikh law.

Compromise on Sikh Headwear In French Schools

A controversial French law enacted last year that banned conspicuous religious symbols and attire in public schools has posed problems for Sikh students, as well as others. Now, however, there appears to be some compromise on the part of the French government. The Panthic Weekly reported yesterday that lobbying by the Sikh community in France and around the European Union, as well as behind-the-scenes pressure by the government of India, has led to permission for Sikh students to wear "patkas"-- which are headscarfs or under-turbans. The Sikh community in France hopes this is a first step toward allowing students to wear the dastar (turban).

Army Grants Sikh Soldier Accommodation After His Preliminary Court Victory

As previously reported, last month the D.C. federal district court issued a preliminary injunction barring the Army from subjecting Sikh Army officer Simratpal Singh to any non-standard or discriminatory testing for his helmet and gas mask.  Now without mentioning the court decision, the Army has issued a Memorandum (full text) dated March 30 granting Singh an accommodation, subject to various conditions. The Memorandum from Assistant Secretary of the Army Debra Wada to Singh reads in part:

I have considered your request for a religious accommodation to permit you to wear a beard, turban, and uncut hair in observance of your Sikh faith.... I grant your request for an exception to Army personal appearance and grooming standards, subject to the limitations described below....

While assigned or performing non-hazardous duties, you may wear a beard, turban, and uncut hair in a neat and conservative manner that presents a professional and well-groomed appearance. The bulk or your hair, beard, or turban may not be such that it impairs your ability to wear the Army Combat Helmet ... or other protective equipment....

Because of the Army's strong interest in maintaining good order and discipline, the Army intends to develop clear uniform standards applicable to Soldiers who have received a religious accommodation. Until such standards are published, you may wear a black turban (or under turban, as appropriate).... 

The Memorandum goes on to specify precise hair and beard lengths, and says that Singh's commander is to provide quarterly assessments of the effect of the accommodation on unit cohesion and morale, good order and discipline, health and safety, and individual and unit readiness. West reports on the Army's action.

UPDATE: Stars and Stripes reported on April 11 that 3 additional Sikh enlistees have been granted similar accommodations.

British Sikhs Challenge 2011 Census Form

Britain's Sikh Federation is considering filing a lawsuit against the UK government's Office of National Statistics over the form it plans to use for the 2011 census. According to yesterday's Sikh Times, the government intends to list Sikhs as a choice in the voluntary portion of the form that asks about religious affiliation. The Sikh group insists that Sikh should also be a choice in the compulsory portion of the form that asks about ethnicity. They say that otherwise this will continue the under count of Sikhs that occurred ten years ago, reducing the amount of government services to which they are entitled.

First Sikh Inaugural Ball Will Be Held

The Sikh Community Center announced this week that the first ever Sikh Inaugural Ball will be held in Washington, D.C. on January 20. The Sikh Inaugural Ball Inaugural Committee will hold the event a few blocks from the White House, at Ascot, I-The Indian Experience Restaurant. No more than 300 tickets will be sold.

India's Parliament Allows Separate Registration of Sikh Marriages

The Tribune (Chandigarh, India) reports that both houses of India's Parliament this week passed a long-pending amendment to the Anand Karaj Act 1909 that will now allow separate registration of Sikh marriages solemnized under the Anand Karaj ritual.  The bill will become law when the President assents to it.  The new law however is only a first step toward Sikhs obtaining separate recognition.  India's Constitution (Art. 25) still defines Sikhs as Hindus.  The new law is not even a full separate Sikh marriage law, since it says nothing about divorce.  It merely will permit the central government to direct states to maintain separate marriage registers for Sikhs and designate separate bodies to register Sikh weddings.

Suit By Former IRS Agent Says Bar On Kirpan Was Religious Discrimination

Yesterday a lawsuit was filed in a Texas federal district court by a former Sikh employee of the Internal Revenue Service. The lawsuit is described in a press release distributed by e-mail by the Becket Fund:

Kawaljeet Tagore, a Sikh American, ... claims that the IRS discriminated against her by prohibiting her from wearing a kirpan, a mandatory article of faith, on her job as a revenue agent at the Mickey Leland Federal Building in downtown Houston.... Tagore was fired in July 2006 because she refused to remove her kirpan.... The kirpan commonly resembles a sword, and is intended as a constant reminder to its bearer of a Sikh's solemn duty to protect the weak and promote justice for all....

The lawsuit claims that the IRS's termination of Tagore violates both the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) and Title VII religious employment discrimination rules. It alleges that the IRS banned the kirpan as a so-called "dangerous weapon," even though the government allows hundreds of sharp knives and box cutters in the Leland Building. The edge of Tagore's kirpan is three inches long and is not sharp.

The full text of the complaint in Tagore v. United States, (SD TX, filed 1/6/2009) seeks a declaratory judgment, injunction, reinstatement and back pay. The suit was filed by the Becket Fund and the Sikh Coalition.

Canadian Court Invalidates Meeting of Sikh Temple, Finding Inadequate Notice

In Grewal v. Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara Society, (BC CA, Nov. 2, 2012), the Court of Appeal for the Canadian province of British Columbia upheld a lower court ruling that invalidated a resolution changing the qualifications for election to the Sikh temple's Executive Committee. The case was triggered by a dispute between "old guard" members of the Gurdwara, many of whom are "non-baptized" Sikhs, and younger members who are baptized and who were elected to the Executive Committee in 2009. The Sikh Youth Executive obtained passage by members in 2010 of new provisions for giving notice of Gurdwara meetings. Instead of giving notice by mail, effective notice could be given by publication in English language and Punjabi language newspapers with a circulation of over 10,000, plus publication on the Gurdwara's website and posting a notice on a bulletin board in the hall of the temple.  At the 2011 meeting, called using this procedure, members changed the qualifications for election to the Executive Committee. Now only baptized Sikhs were eligible.

In invalidating that change, the court concluded that the notice given for the meeting did not meet the requirements of province's Society Act, Sec. 60:

There was evidence that certain of the newspaper notices were contained in papers not circulated but given away at certain locations.  It seems to me that it would be difficult to demonstrate that such a methodology could ever be the type of notice contemplated to be given to members of a society pursuant to s. 60 of the Act....  A “giveaway” paper is obviously a wholly inadequate vessel for the giving of proper notice.

The court also suggested, without deciding, that it was not adequate to give notice in papers having a circulation as low as 10,000 when the Society had over 30,000 members. Surrey Now reports on the decision.

EEOC Sues On Behalf Of Sikh Employee

The Sikh Coalition reports that last Thursday the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit on behalf of Sukhvir Kaur, a Sikh woman, against National Wholesale Liquidators, charging religious, gender and national origin discrimination. An April press release by the Coalition provides background on the case in which, among other things, Kaur's manager told her that Sikh employees are "thieves", and retaliated against her for rebuffing his advances.

As Indian Prime Minister Visits Britain, Religious Minorities' Rights Are Raised

India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi, head of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (Indian People's Party) began an important 3-day formal visit to Britain yesterday. However his visit has been dogged by concerns on at least two fronts regarding the rights of religious minorities in India. According to The Guardian:

In the last few months, mobs of fanatics, some linked to his party, the BJP, have lynched Muslims for eating, carrying or possessing beef, or on mere suspicion of having done so.... Most of all, however, critics say it was Modi himself who spawned the narrative of beef as a critical issue during elections last year by warning of a “pink revolution” (a widespread slaughter of cows) if his party didn’t win.

Meanwhile, Sikhs have a different concern, and have enlisted Britain's Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn in their cause. According to an NSO Press Release"

The office for the leader of the Labour Party has said Jeremy Corbyn will be taking up the issue of the 1984 Sikh genocide with the Indian premier during his visit to Britain this week.... [P]rior to Mr Modi’s landslide victory, he and his party had placed the blame for the killings of Sikhs on the then Congress government. Furthermore, following appointment to office Mr Modi’s Home Minister described the killings as “genocide”.... [However, according to a Sikh leader in the UK] ... "Mr Modi has done nothing to bring identified Congress leaders who urged gangs of hooligans, to kill, murder and burn Sikh men, women and children, to justice. They now freely roam the streets gloating of their achievements to the bewilderment of relatives of those murdered, as well as the wider Sikh community."

Obama Visit To Sikh Temple In India Scrubbed, Apparently Over Head Covering Issue

President Obama will visit India next month. The New York Times reported yesterday that Sikhs in the United States are distressed that tentative plans for him to include a stop at the Golden Temple in Amristar have been cancelled. It is reported that part of the reason for the cancellation is the Sikh tradition that men tie a piece of cloth on their heads before entering the Temple.  Apparently the White House is concerned that photos of the President wearing a Sikh headscarf will further false perceptions that he is Muslim, not Christian. However security reasons may also be playing a part since the Temple is near the Pakistan border.  Sikh groups in the U.S. are encouraging Obama to reconsider, saying that a visit by him would allow Sikhs to introduce themselves to the world. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs says Obama's schedule is not finalized

9th Circuit Hears Oral Arguments In Dispute Over Control of Sikh Dharma Company

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals last Thursday heard oral arguments in Puri v. Khalsa (Docket No. 13-36024) (video of full oral arguments).  Courthouse News Service has extensive background on the case in which Bibiji Inderjit Kaur Puri, the widow of the leader of the Sikh Dharma faith, is seeking a seat on the board of the company that makes Yogi Tea and which also controls various parts of the Sikh Dharma religious movement. Here is an excerpt from CNS's excellent report:

Bibiji sued in Multnomah County [Oregon] Circuit Court, claiming that her husband had wanted her to be a board member and accusing the board of Unto Infinity of inflating their salaries and executing a self-serving sale of the company's cereal division that cheated Sikh Dharma....

The parties agreed to settle in arbitration. But Bibiji moved the case to Federal Court, claiming the settlement was never ratified and was unfair.... There, U.S. District Judge Michael W. Mossman dismissed the case, finding that Bibiji lacked standing to sue ... because she is not a board member. He also found that the First Amendment prohibited him from installing the leaders of a religious organization.

On Thursday, Bibiji's lawyer ... urged a panel of the Ninth Circuit to apply "neutral principles of law" rather than a First Amendment exception.

(See prior related posting.)

Court Enjoins Army From Requiring Special Testing of Sikh Officer

In Singh v. Carter, (D DC, March 3, 2016), the D.C. federal district court, invoking RFRA, granted a preliminary injunction protecting religious rights of an Army officer.  The Army had ordered a decorated Sikh Army captain to undergo costly specialized testing with his helmet and protective mask to assure that his religiously required head covering, beard and uncut hair will not interfere with the functions of the helmet and mask. The court said:

At first blush, the challenged order appears to reflect a reasonably thorough and even benevolent decision by the Army to fulfill its duty of protecting the health and safety of this particular Sikh officer.

Yet, that is far from the complete picture. Thousands of other soldiers are permitted to wear long hair and beards for medical or other reasons, without being subjected to such specialized and costly expert testing of their helmets and gas masks. Moreover, other Sikh soldiers have been permitted to maintain their articles of faith without such specialized testing.

See prior related posting.