Israel's Cabinet Approves Proposed Basic Law Declaring Israel As A Jewish State

The Jerusalem Post reports that Israel's Cabinet today voted 15-6 to approve three proposed versions of the highly controversial "Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People." The Cabinet Ministers' discussion descended into a shouting match. The bills will be presented for a preliminary vote in the Knesset Wednesday, and then will go to committee where the versions will be combined. All of the versions protect "Hatikva" as the national anthem, protect state symbols, use of the Hebrew calendar and the Law of Return, and give freedom of access to holy places and protect them.

Israeli Rabbis Debate Jewish Prayer On Temple Mount

Today's Jerusalem Post reports on the halachic (Jewish religious law) dispute between haredi and national religious rabbis in Israel over whether it is permissible for Jews to visit the Temple Mount, now the location of Muslim holy sites.  The issue has taken on new urgency since the attempted assassination last month of Rabbi Yehudah Glick, leader of the Temple Mount Heritage Foundation that promotes the right of Jews to pray on the Mount in preparation for restoring of a third Jewish Temple there. (Background). In recent weeks there have been increased clashes between Arab demonstrators and police in Jerusalem. (Background).

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments On Passport Designation For Americans Born In Jerusalem

The U.S. Supreme Court today heard oral arguments in Zivotofsky v. Kerry,  involving  a dispute between Congress and the Executive Branch over the constitutionality of a statute that calls for the State Department to change its policy and allow "Israel" rather than "Jerusalem" to be listed as the birthplace of Americans born in Jerusalem. The full transcript of the arguments are available on the Court's website. SCOTUSblog has a detailed report on the arguments, suggesting that the various justices were playing "diplomat for a day." This is the second time the case has been before the Supreme Court. (See prior posting.)

Israel's Cabinet Approves Regulation That Will Ease Conversions To Judaism

In a controversial move, Israel's cabinet today approved an administrative regulation that will permit municipal chief rabbis to create conversion courts.  The Jerusalem Post reports that the new regulation, which is strongly opposed by the Chief Rabbinate and haredi (ultra-Orthodox) political parties, will ease the way for conversion for many Russians  who emigrated to Israel under the Law of Return. The government's action came as the Knesset threatened to pass its own bill. Using the route the cabinet did makes it easier to repeal the decision in the future.

Israeli Cult Leader Sentenced To 30 Years In Prison

The Jerusalem Post reports that yesterday an Israeli 3-judge court sentenced 64-year old cult leader Goel Ratzon to 30 years in prison. Before his arrest in 2010, Ratzon had 21 wives and over 40 children who had been part of his cult for 39 years.  He was convicted of sex crimes and financial fraud for his long pattern of requiring his wives to hand over their money to him, tattoo his name and image on their bodies, cut off ties with family and fulfill his demands, including sexual ones. He was acquitted of the charge of "spiritual enslavement."

Israeli Rabbinate To Review Religious Conversions By Criminally-Charged D.C. Rabbi

Haaretz reported yesterday the the Chief Rabbinate of Israel is reviewing the validity of conversions to Judaism performed in recent years by Washington, D.C. Orthodox Rabbi Barry Freundel who was arrested last week and charged with secretly videoing women who were undressing in the synagogue's mikveh (ritual bath). (See prior posting.) The review comes even though the U.S.-based Rabbinical Council of America already ruled yesterday "as a matter of Jewish law that conversions performed by Rabbi Freundel prior to his arrest on October 14, 2014 remain halakhically valid and prior converts remain Jewish in all respects." There has been tension in recent years more generally over whether Israel's rabbinate will recognize conversions performed elsewhere.  Since the Chief Rabbinate has final legal authority on who will be considered Jewish for purposes of marriage in Israel, a negative ruling by them could affect the status of at least four women converted by Freundel who have moved to Israel to marry.

UPDATE: Haaretz reportsthat the Chief Rabbinate in a statement published Oct. 21 said that it will raise no questions regarding the validity of past conversions by Rabbi Fruendel. This comes after strong international criticism of the Rabbinate's initial decision to possibly question some of the past conversions.

Enforcement of Israeli Child Support Order Does Not Violate Establishment Clause

In Jenkins v. Jenkins, (OH App., Oct. 3, 2014), an Ohio Court of Appeals rejected Establishment Clause and equal protection challenges to enforcement of a child support order issued by an Israeli court. While the Israeli civil family court cited Jewish law tradition that makes the father responsible for his daughter's essential support, it went beyond that and applied other considerations as well is setting support.

Enforcement of Israeli Child-Support Order Does Not Violate Establishment Clause

In Jenkins v. Jenkins, (OH App., Oct. 3, 2014), an Ohio Court of Appeals rejected a father's claim that enforcement of an Israeli child-support order would violate his rights because its terms were based on his Jewish religion and his gender. The court noted that the order was issued by an Israeli civil family court, not a religious court.  It went on to conclude that while the family court in Israel cited the Jewish-law tradition that the father is responsible for his daughter’s essential support, the Israeli court went on to consider other factors as well.

New Study Released On Israeli Religion-State Public Opinion

In Israel yesterday, Hiddush- Freedom of Religion for Israel released its 2014 Israel Religion and State Index. The report is its annual study of Israeli public opinion on religion and state issues. Here is an excerpt from the Executive Summary:

[T]he Israeli Jewish public expressed an all-time high dissatisfaction with the government policies regarding religion and state..... A sweeping majority of Israelis (including the beleaguered residents of southern Israel) indicated their opposition to the claim, used to legitimize ultra-Orthodox draft evasion, that Torah study and prayers are Israel's true defense mechanism. Similarly, the majority of the respondents did not accept rabbinic explanations that security incidents and natural disasters are caused by punishments for religious sins.  Unfortunately, freedom of religion and equality continuously fall victim to politicians who ignore the strong will of the Israeli public for freedom of religion and equality.

Legal Loopholes Allow Israeli Farmers To Avoid Sabbatical Year Strictures

JTA this week carries a report on the legal technicalities surrounding observance of the Biblical Sabbatical year for farmers in Israel.  With the coming of Rosh Hashanah (Jewish New Year) in late September, the Sabbatical year begins.  Various legal loopholes-- such as the fictional sale of farms to non-Jewish owners for a nominal amount for the year-- have been developed through the Chief Rabbinate and Religious Courts to allow Jewish farmers to avoid the complete shut-down of their farms that would flow from strict observance of the Biblical mandate.

In Criminal Trial of Palestinian, Jewish Judge Recuses Himself On New Grounds

In Detroit yesterday, federal district Judge Paul Borman recused himself, sua sponte, in the criminal trial of a Palestinian woman chargged with failing to disclose to immigration officials the fact that she spent ten years in an Israeli prison for participating in two terrorist plots, one of which involved the bombing of a supermarket.  Last month Borman refused to recuse himself when his impartiality was challenged on the basis of his history of fundraising for the Detroit Jewish Federation and his organizing trips to Israel. (See prior posting.) Now, however, the prosecution furnished a translation of the Israeli indictment against defendant Rasmieh Odeh which indicated that the supermarket targeted in the bombing plot was a SuperSol. In United States v. Odeh, (ED MI, Aug. 12, 2014), Judge Borman wrote:

[A]t the time of the 1969 bombing, my family had a passive financial investment connection to SuperSol.... The Court concludes that my family’s passive financial investment connection to SuperSol at the time of the 1969 bombing could be perceived as establishing a reasonably objective inference of a lack of impartiality in the context of the issues presented in this case.

I recuse today, not because of my charitable giving or my work on behalf of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit or other charities, which I concluded in my previous Order created neither the reasonable appearance nor the fact of impartiality. My decision to recuse today is based upon facts which became known to me yesterday in review of a relevant document not previously seen by the Court....

The Chicago Sun-Times reports on the decision.

Israel's Law of Return Extended To Same-Sex Non-Jewish Spouses

Since 1970, Israel's Law of Return which grants every Jew in the world the right to settle in Israel has also permitted the non-Jewish spouse of a Jew to settle in the country. The Jerusalem Post reports that yesterday Israel's Interior Minister Gidon Saar instructed the Population and Immigration Authority and the Jewish Agency to grant immigration visas and Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return to non-Jewish same-sex spouses on the same basis as to heterosexual couples. Haredi (ultra-Orthodox Jewish) groups in Israel and the United States strongly criticized the Interior Minister's decision.

Israel's Supreme Court Says Rabbinical Courts Lack Jurisdiction To Order Circumcision of Child

Israel's High Court of Justice on Sunday held 6-1 that a rabbinical court did not have jurisdiction in the context of a divorce action to order a couple to circumcise their one-year old son over the mother's objection. (See prior posting.)  Jerusalem Post reports that Deputy Supreme Court President Miriam Naor wrote in her majority opinion that the question of circumcision is unrelated to divorce issues that define the rabbinical courts' jurisdiction.  She said that parents have the right to make decisions in their child’s best interests whether they are married or divorced. The Court held that the question should be decided by the civil family court system. Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, president of the Supreme Rabbinical Court of Appeal, strongly criticized the High Court's decision, saying in part:

This ruling is another severe step in which Jewish judges forbid the fulfillment of a mitzva for which the Jewish people sacrificed its lives for throughout the generations.

Israel's Justice Minister Officiates At Same-Sex Jewish Wedding; Marriage Not Legally Recognized

In Israel yesterday, Justice Minister Tzipi Livni officiated at a same-sex wedding ceremony, even though the marriage will not be recognized by the Israeli government.  Jerusalem Post reports that Livni conducted the ceremony for Tsach Sa'ar, a former aide to a member of the Knesset, and Guy Arad, an attorney.  The ceremony used a traditional huppah (wedding canopy), and the traditional breaking of a glass by the groom used two glasses, one for each man to break. Posting pictures on her Facebook page, Livni wrote that the ceremony was not intended to be a provocation against Judaism, but instead respected Jewish tradition.  She added, "In our eyes, Judaism is open, accepting and respects all people who were created in God's image."

Court Rejects Jurisdictional Defenses In IRS 501(c)(3) Policy Challenge

In Z Street, Inc., v. Koskinen, (D DC, May 27, 2014), the D.C. federal district court rejected a number of jurisdictional and procedural defenses raised by the Internal Revenue Service in a viewpoint discrimination suit brought by a conservative pro-Israel group challenging the IRS's "Israel Special Policy."  Plaintiff alleges that the IRS has a policy of sending applications by Israel-related non-profit organizations seeking 501(c)(3) status to a special unit in the D.C. office to determine if the organization's policies differ from those of the Obama administration. Applications by such groups are allegedly subjected to additional review procedures not applied to others. In rejecting the IRS's motion to dismiss, the court said:

Defendant struggles mightily to transform a lawsuit that clearly challenges the constitutionality of the process that the IRS allegedly employs when it determines the tax-exempt status of certain organizations into a dispute over tax liability as a means of attempting to thwart this action’s advancement. But the instant complaint, which in no way seeks an assessment of the taxes to be paid or even a determination of the Plaintiff’s Section 501(c)(3) status, is not so easily deterred.

[Thanks to Steven H. Sholk for the lead.]

Israel's High Court of Justice Invalidates A Stipend Program For Orthodox Yeshiva Students

Times of Israel reports on a decision handed down Sunday by a 7-judge panel of Israel's High Court of Justice invalidating a government program that awards 4-year Orthodox Jewish yeshiva students stipends designed to assure that they receive the equivalent of the minimum wage.  The court ruled that, like another scholarship program it struck down in 2010, the stipends perpetuate favoritism toward yeshiva students and discriminate against "other groups, including women, those of other faiths, students belonging to other Jewish denominations and university students." It said that the program does not appear to carry out the government's goal of encouraging yeshiva students to enter the workforce after 4 years. The stipend cut-off takes effect next year.  A separate program that aids longer-term yeshiva students was upheld by the Court.

Pope Visits Holy Land; Presses On Peace Efforts

Pope Francis is on a 3-day visit to the Holy Land, originally described by the Vatican as follows:

The Holy Father will travel to the Holy Land from Saturday, 24 May to Monday, 26 May, to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the historic embrace between Paul VI and Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras in Jerusalem on 5 January 1964.

The trip takes the Pope to Jordan, the Palestinian territories and Israel. the Full text of all the Papal addresses during the trip and all Vatican media reports on it are on a special Holy Land Pilgrimage website.

AP reports today that the Pope became heavily involved in encouraging Middle East peace efforts by inviting Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli President Shimon Peres to a summit in the Vatican next month to discuss the peace process. Both presidents have accepted. According to AP:

Peres has been a fervent support of Mideast peace efforts, and the independent-minded Israeli president, whose job is largely ceremonial, risks upsetting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with the move.

U.S. Supreme Court Grants Review In Dispute Over Passport Listing of Jerusalem As Place of Birth

The U.S. Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Zivotofsky v. Kerry, (Docket No. 13-628, cert. granted 4/22/2014). (Order List.) This is the second time the case will have been heard by the Supreme Court. In 2012 it ruled that the political question doctrine does not prevent federal courts from ruling in a dispute between Congress and the State Department over whether Americans born in Jerusalem are to have "Jerusalem", not "Israel", listed as their place of birth. (See prior posting.) A congressional statute calls for the State Department to change its policy and list "Israel", but the Executive Branch claims that this statute unconstitutionally interferes with the President's constitutional authority to conduct the country's foreign affairs. In a 2013 decision-- the case which the Supreme Court today agreed to review-- the D.C. Circuit agreed with the Executive Branch that the statute impermissibly intrudes on the President’s exclusive power to decide whether and on what terms to recognize foreign nations. (Zivotofsky v. Secretary of State, (DC Cir., July 232, 2013).

Israel's Supreme Court Rules That Original Austrian Jewish Historical Documents Should Stay In Israel

Haaretz reports that a 3-judge panel of Israel's Supreme Court yesterday handed down a decision in a suit by the Jewish community in Vienna, Austria seeking return from Israel's  Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People of thousands of historical documents deposited there after World War II to keep them safe.  The Austrians claim that the documents, which trace the community's history, were only on loan and should be returned now that a Jewish museum is being built in Vienna. The Jerusalem archives claims that the materials were given to them in perpetuity.  The Supreme Court urged the two sides to come to an agreement that would result in the original documents remaining in Israel, with a digital copy going back to Vienna and some of the original documents being sent on loan to the Museum of the Jewish Community in Vienna once it is completed.

Israeli Trial Court Dismisses Negligence Charges Against Mohels -- No Law Broken

Haaretz reports that an Israeli Magistrate's Court in the city of Ashkelon last week acquitted two individuals who had been charged with criminal negligence in connection with the Jewish ritual  circumcision of a baby boy. One of those charged was a well known mohel with many years of experience, and the other was a student from overseas learning from him.  They jointly performed a circumcision in which a baby boy suffered excessive bleeding, but no lasting harm.  Criminal charges were filed when it was learned that the experienced mohel's certification from Israel's Chief Rabbinate had expired, and the student had not yet been certified.

During the trial, though, it became clear that no law had been broken.  In the past, legislation has been introduced into Israel's Knesset to set standards for who may perform ritual circumcisions.  Proposals have not passed because technically Jewish law imposes the obligation on the father to circumcise his son.  Usually fathers delegate the task to a professional mohel.  But if a father who did not meet legislative criteria chose to perform the circumcision himself, the law would be imposing criminal penalties on the performance of a religious obligation.  This could create freedom of religion concerns. Magistrate Judge Haim Nachmias however in dismissing the charges wrote:

The legislators would be wise to regulate the profession of performing circumcisions, and the supervision of those performing this religious commandment, through legislation.  And it would be better had this been done already.