Tai Chi Class Sites Are Not Places of Worship For Tax Exemption Law In Ontario

In Fung Loy Kok Institute of Taoism v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, (ON Super. Ct., Jan. 6, 2022), an Ontario (Canada) appellate court held that a Taoist organization was not entitled to a municipal property tax exemption for its satellite sites at which Tai Chi classes are held. The court concluded that these sites are not "places of worship" as that term is used in Ontario's Assessment Act. The court said in part:

Use of a property as a place of worship is different than other uses to which religious organizations can put property.  Evangelization efforts for example....

MPAC argues that the application judge accepted that religious expression and activities occur at the Satellite Sites.  However, in order to create an exemption for those properties, those activities must constitute acts of worship, a more narrow form of activity than the simple act of conducting a practice that has religious connotation.

CTV News reports on the decision.

Ontario Court Upholds Requirement That Objecting Doctors Refer Patients to Others

In Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, (Ont. Ct. App., May 15, 2019), the Ontario Court of Appeal rejected a constitutional challenge to two policies of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.  At issue is the requirement that physicians who object to providing any medical procedure or pharmaceuticals on the basis of religion or conscience must refer the patient to a non-objecting, available and accessible physician, health care professional or agency.  Physicians challenging the policies claimed they infringe their freedom of conscience and religion under Sec. 2(a) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by requiring them to be complicit in procedures such as abortion or aid in dying that violate their religious beliefs. In a 74-page opinion, the court held while the policies infringe religious liberty, the infringement is justified under Sec. 1 of the Charter, because they are reasonable limits, demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. The Globe & Mail reports on the decision.

Canadian Agency Violates Foster Parents' Rights By Insisting They Say Easter Bunny Is Real

Canadian Press reports that an Ontario Superior Court judge ruled this week that a Christian couple's religious beliefs were infringed in violation of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms when the Children's Aid Society of Hamilton removed two foster children from their home.  The action closing their foster home came after a social worker insisted that the couple tell the two young girls that the Easter Bunny is real. Foster parents Frances and Derek Baars say that doing so would violate their religious beliefs.  The court wrote in part:

There is ample evidence to support the fact that the children were removed because the Baars refused to either tell or imply that the Easter Bunny was delivering chocolate to the Baars' home. I am more than satisfied that the society actions interfered substantially with the Baars' religious beliefs.

Ontario Court Holds Mahr Is Part of Family Property In Divorce

In Bakhshi v. Hosseinzadeh,(Ont. Ct. App., Nov. 2, 2017), the Ontario Court of appeal held that the Mahr in an Islamic marriage contract is to be counted as part of net family property.  The Family Law Act in the Canadian province of Ontario calls for equal division of family-owned property in a divorce.  Here the marriage contract called for the husband to pay the wife 230 gold coins (found by the court to be worth $79,580).  The Court of Appeals held that the wife is entitled to receive the Mahr payment from her husband, but that (absent a provision to the contrary in the marriage contract) this amount is then to be included as family-owned property in the equalization calculation. Law Times reports on the decision.

Trinity Western Grads Will Not Be Eligible For the Ontario Bar

The controversy over Canada's newest proposed law school-- Christian affiliated Trinity Western-- continues. At the center of the controversy is a provision in the school's "community covenant" that calls for abstention from "sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman." The Toronto Star reports that after receiving approval earlier this month from the Law Society of British Columbia-- the school's home province-- yesterday the school suffered a defeat in the province of Ontario.  The Law Society of Upper Canada voted 28-21 against granting the school accreditation. This means that the school's graduates will not be permitted to apply for admission to the bar in Ontario.  A vote is expected today by the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society, and in June by the Law Society of New Brunswick.

UPDATE: On April 25, the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society voted 10-9 to only give provisional accreditation to Trinity Western law school. Its graduates will be allowed to enroll in the province's bar admission program only if the school drops its Community Covenant that bars same-sex intimacy.  If the Covenant is not dropped graduates will not be allowed to article in the province, but they can still practice in Nova Scotia according to the Prince George Citizen.

Ontario Court Orders Children From Jewish Sect Back To Quebec For Foster Care

In the Canadian province of Ontario yesterday, a trial court judge ordered that 13 children of the Jewish ultra-Orthodox Lev Tahor sect be returned to child protection authorities in Quebec where a court has already ordered the children be placed in foster care. (See prior posting.) When court proceedings were begun in Quebec, about 200 Lev Tahor members fled to Ontario in the middle of the night. As reported by Canadian Press, Chatham, Ontario judge Stephen Fuerth wrote in part:

It would be impractical at best and potentially harmful at worst if the society were now required, in the context of the need to protect the children, to conduct a separate and new investigation into all of the issues currently before the Court of Quebec...simply because the parents have decided as a tactical manoeuvre to absent themselves from Quebec in order to frustrate the process of justice that had started.

The court stayed its order for 30 days to give the families a chance to appeal, with provision for child protection workers to keep checking on the children. An appeal of the Quebec court order-- entered after the community fled-- is already being appealed.