3. For years, the trustees, the chancellor, and the president of Saddleback College have routinely held official prayer at numerous events for college students and faculty, including scholarship ceremonies, graduations, and the Chancellor’s Opening Sessions.[Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]
4. The college communities are religiously diverse, and the official prayers deeply offend many students, faculty, and staff. For some, the official prayers are insulting to their deeply held religious beliefs, or even offensive to God. For some, the official prayers make them feel like outsiders because they do not belong to the District’s preferred faith community. And for some, the official prayers represent the District’s attempt to impose that preferred faith on them.
5. For years, therefore, college students, faculty, and staff, as well as scholarship donors, community members, and others have publicly objected to the District’s prayer practice, requesting that a moment of silence or some other, less divisive practice be adopted instead. But rather than respecting the beliefs of its faculty and students, the trustees, the chancellor, and Saddleback College’s president have responded by expanding the prayer practice, by making the prayers ever more religious and divisive, and by publicly attacking members of minority faiths and nonbelievers for not sharing the District’s preferred faith. Plaintiffs therefore have no choice but to seek provisional relief and a permanent injunction to stop the prayer.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Monday, November 23, 2009
Suit Challenges Policy of Opening College Events With Prayer
White House Marks Sikh Holiday For First Time
Recent Articles Of Interest
- Israel Zvi Gilat, 'Conquest by War' in Jewish Law: The Beautiful Woman Case, (November 17, 2009).
- John Mikhail, Dilemmas of Cultural Legality: A Comment on Roger Cotterrell's 'The Struggle for Law' and a Criticism of the House of Lords' Opinions in Begum, (International Journal of Law in Context, Vol. 4, pp. 385-393, 2009).
- Norman T. Deutsch, May Religious Worship Be Excluded from a Limited Public Forum? Commentary on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. Glover, (University of Hawaii Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 29, 2008).
- Lael Daniel Weinberger, Religion Undefined: Competing Frameworks for Understanding 'Religion' in the Establishment Clause, (University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 4, 2009).
From SmartCILP and elsewhere:
- Robert A. Kahn, The Danish Cartoon Controversy and the Rhetoric of Libertarian Regret, 16 University of Miami International & Comparative Law Review 151-181 (2009).
- Richard Falk, Responsible Scholarship in "Dark Times", 7 UCLA Journal of Islamic & Near Eastern Law 1-16 (2008-2009).
- Umar F. Abd-Allah, Living Islam with Purpose, 7 UCLA Journal of Islamic & Near Eastern Law 17-66 (2008-2009).
- Mohamed Abdel Dayem & Fatima Ayub, In the Path of Allah: Evolving Interpretations of Jihad and Its Modern Challenges, 7 UCLA Journal of Islamic & Near Eastern Law 67-120 (2008-2009).
- Nicholas May, Holy Rebellion: Religious Assembly Laws in Antebellum South Carolina and Virginia, 49 American Journal of Legal History 237-256 (2007).
- Susan Weiss, The Tort of Get Refusal, (Conversations, The Journal of the Institute for Jewish Ideas and Ideals, Issue 5, 2009).
Norwegian Univeristy Debates Use of Gym For Muslim Prayers
Recent Prisoner Free Excercise Cases
In Pressley v. Madison, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107231 (ND GA, Nov. 17, 2009), a Georgia federal district judge permitted a Muslim plaintiff to move ahead with her complaint that she was not permitted to wear her hijab covering her head while temporarily transferred for two days from prison to a county jail. The suit asks for an injunction to prohibit Barrow County Jail from depriving Muslim women of their hijabs and also seeks several million dollars in damages.
In Williams v. Cate, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107920 (ED CA, Nov. 10, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge allowed a prisoner who was a member of the House of Yahweh faith to proceed against some of the defendants named in his lawsuit for alleged violations of the free exercise and equal protection clauses, as well as RLUIPA. The lawsuit alleged refusals to accommodate plaintiff's religious dietary requirements, failure to hold House of Yahweh religious services and discrimination in funding from the religious services budget.
In Morris v. Woodford, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107612 (ND CA, Nov. 18, 2009), a California federal district court held that a prisoner had stated a cognizable claim under the 1st Amendment and RLUIPA. His complaint alleged denial and confiscation of his Qu'ran and other Islamic study and prayer materials.
In Lynch v. Huffman, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107476 (SD IN, Nov. 17, 2009), an Indiana federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that his free exercise rights were violated when his request to see a chaplain was ignored while he was in administrative segregation for two months. He did not allege this imposed a substantial burden on his religious exercise. Moreover the claim was now moot.
European Commission Tells Britian Its Exemption For Church Employees Is Too Broad
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Religious Scholar Becomes Effective Regime Opponent In Iran
Maldives Considering Ban On Public Worship By Non-Muslims
Suit Challenges Closing of 50 Churches By Cleveland Catholic Diocese
Last month McGrath was named in a restraining order preventing her and other protesters from taking over a church in Akron scheduled for closure. The Diocese has now worked out a compromise under which protesters can remain in a Church until midnight on the day of its last Mass.
Regulatory Issues Abound In New York Hasidic Village
The most controversial immediate issue is the planned construction of a large kosher poultry slaughterhouse on city land abutting on homes just outside of New Square. The slaughterhouse project has received a $1.62 million grant of state development funds, even though it has not received approval from local planning departments. A smaller slaughterhouse constructed ten years ago already cause various sorts of problems for its neighbors.There has also been a history of non-compliance with state fire codes in the dense housing developments in New Square. The problems are complicated by the insularity of the Hasidic community, whose first language is Yiddish, and its political clout growing out of its ability to get the community to vote as a block for favored candidates. Earlier this month, 100% of New Square's 2075 votes went to one of the two candidates running to head Ramapo's government. The opposing candidate had expressed concern about the slaughterhouse project.
Rhode Island Bishop Tells Patrick Kennedy Not to Receive Communion
UPDATE: Former New York governor, Mario Cuomo, reacting to Church pressure on Patrick Kennedy, warned that if Church leaders pressure Catholic politicians to follow Church teaching in their political roles, this may well lead to people being hesitant to vote for Catholics. According to AP on Sunday, Cuomo said in part: "The American people need no course in philosophy or political science or church history to know that God should not be made into a celestial party chairman."
UPDATE2: Bishop Thomas J. Tobin issued a statement (11/22) in response to Rep. Kennedy's remarks. He says he wrote Kennedy in Feb. 2007 asking that he refrain from receiving Holy Communion in light of his consistent actions in opposition to Church teachings. The letter said that Tobin was writing Kennedy "personally and confidentially as a pastor addressing a member of his flock." Tobin says he is disappointed that Kennedy has now made this public.
Saturday, November 21, 2009
2nd Circuit Says EEOC Can Subpoena Company's Nationwide Records
9th Circuit Won't Enjoin Church Sign Regulations, But Remands For Further Consideration
New York High Court OK's State Employee Benefits To Same-Sex Spouses
IRS Schedules Hearing On Changes For Authorizing Church Tax Examinations
Indiana Christian TV Station Produces Program on Faith and the Law
Ohio Supreme Court: Regional Church Offices Are Not Tax Exempt
The dissenters argued that the headquarters were exempt as property used exclusively for a charitable purpose because it plays an integral role in the public worship and outreach programs of local churches.
Friday, November 20, 2009
New Catholic, Evangelical Declaration Reaffirms Pro-Life, Traditional Marriage Agenda
Today's New York Times reporting on the Declaration says that the document, written by Prison Fellowship founder Charles Colson, "is an effort to rejuvenate the political alliance of conservative Catholics and evangelicals that dominated the religious debate during the [Bush] administration.... They want to signal to the Obama administration and to Congress that they are still a formidable force that will not compromise on abortion, stem-cell research or gay marriage." [Thanks to Ira "Chip" Lupu for the lead.]While the whole scope of Christian moral concern, including a special concern for the poor and vulnerable, claims our attention, we are especially troubled that in our nation today the lives of the unborn, the disabled, and the elderly are severely threatened; that the institution of marriage, already buffeted by promiscuity, infidelity and divorce, is in jeopardy of being redefined to accommodate fashionable ideologies; that freedom of religion and the rights of conscience are gravely jeopardized by those who would use the instruments of coercion to compel persons of faith to compromise their deepest convictions.
.... We are Christians who have joined together across historic lines of ecclesial differences to affirm our right—and, more importantly, to embrace our obligation—to speak and act in defense of these truths.... Because we honor justice and the common good, we will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other anti-life act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family. We will fully and ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar’s. But under no circumstances will we render to Caesar what is God’s.
Award By Rabbinical Court Vacated Over Limit on Party's Choice of Attorney
Ban On Transfer of Funds To Iraq Does Not Infringe Charity's Free Exercise
Individual Congregations Seek To Intervene In Fort Worth Episcopal Diocese Case
Groups Challenge Use of Church for Graduation Ceremonies
We ... understand that when the Board first approved using the Cathedral for graduations, it was told that the religious items in the Cathedral would be covered for graduations. In fact, this never occurred; indeed, ... religious symbolism is inherent in virtually every aspect of the Cathedral, and so secularizing the facility for school events would not appear to be possible....The ACLU filed a similar objection in 2006 when the use of the Cathedral began. (See prior posting.)
[T]hat the Enfield Schools may have secular reasons for using the Cathedral (such as the price or the physical amenities of the facility) does not render such use constitutional. The Establishment Clause not only prohibits conduct that has a religious purpose, but also conduct that has a religious effect, such as religious coercion, endorsement, or delegation.... Second, the placement of a disclaimer on school graduation programs cannot cure the constitutional violations. A disclaimer does nothing to prevent or remedy coercive imposition of religion upon students and family members at a graduation ceremony, as we have here.
Defendant Sentenced For Cyber Attack On Scientology Websites
University Settles With Woman Fired For Being A Witch
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Appeal Filed Seeking Acceptance of D.C. Marriage Initiative Petition
Yesterday, several proponents of the initiative filed suit seeking court review of the Election Board's ruling. The complaint (full text) in Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, (DC Super. Ct., filed 11/18/2009), challenges the restriction in D.C. law that precludes using the initiative for any measure that would authorize discrimination in violation of the Human Rights Act. It also argues that the Initiative does not violate the HRA. Alliance Defense Fund issued a release announcing that the appeal had been filed.
Groups Will Portray Nativity Scene On Supreme Court Sidewalk
Malaysia Authorities Charge Progressive Muslim Cleric
Deputy Proposes Change In Russia's National Anthem to Remove Reference To God
Israel's High Court Denies Rehearing In Grant of Kosher Certification To Messianic
Think-Tank Charges U.S. Conservatives With Using African Clergy In LGBT Battles
Additional background is also available from PRA's website. Ekklesia carries an article on PRA's new report.U.S. conservatives have successfully recruited a significant number of prominent African religious leaders to a campaign seeking to restrict the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people. The flagship issue ... is the ordination of LGBT clergy by mainline Protestant denominations-- particularly the Episcopal, Presbyterian, and Methodist churches-- in the United States....
As a direct result of this campaign, homophobia is on the rise in Africa-- from increased incidents of violence to antigay legislation that carries the death penalty....
[O]ne of the main organizations promoting homophobia in both Africa and the United States over the last decade is the Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD), a well-funded neoconservative think tank that opposed the African liberation struggles. In Africa, IRD and other U.S. conservatives present mainline denominations' commitments to human rights as imperialistic attempts to manipulate Africans into accepting homosexuality-- which they characterize as a purely western phenomenon. For IRD, this campaign is part of a long-term, deliberate, and successful strategy to weaken and split U.S. mainline denominations, block their powerful progressive social witness promoting social and economic justice, and promote political and social conservatism in the United States. Using African leaders as a wedge in the U.S. conflicts is only its latest and perhaps most effective tactic.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
EEOC Says TSA Failed To Accommodate Rastafarian's Dreadlocks
Cloture Voted On Hamilton's Nomination For 7th Circuit
The most strident criticisms accused Hamilton of "prohibiting prayers that mention Jesus Christ in the Indiana House of Representatives, but allowing prayers that mention Allah." (Red State blog.) That charge grew out of language in Hamilton's second opinion explaining the scope of the injunction. It specifically banned sectarian prayer, including Christian prayer that uses the name of "Christ." Hamilton emphasized that the only sectarian prayers that seem to have been offered in the Indiana House were Christian ones. Non-sectarian prayer, addressing God more generically, is permitted. Hamilton wrote:
The Arabic word "Allah" is used for “God” in Arabic translations of Jewish and Christian scriptures. If those offering prayers in the Indiana House of Representatives choose to use the Arabic Allah, the Spanish Dios, the German Gott, the French Dieu, the Swedish Gud, the Greek Theos, the Hebrew Elohim, the Italian Dio, or any other language's terms in addressing the God who is the focus of the non-sectarian prayers contemplated in Marsh v. Chambers, the court sees little risk that the choice of language would advance a particular religion or disparage others. If and when the prayer practices in the Indiana House of Representatives ever seem to be advancing Islam, an appropriate party can bring the problem to the attention of this or another court.The Senate is scheduled to take its final vote on Hamilton's nomination today.
UPDATE: On Thursday the Senate gave final approval to Hamilton's nomination by a vote of 59-39.
Appellate Court Will Consider Procedural Dispute In Ft. Worth Episcopal Diocese Case
Student Sues School After Refusal To Permit Participation In Pro-Life Day
Former Editor Sues Washington Times For Religious Discrimination
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
British Tribunal Grants Asylum To Afghan Convert To Christianity
Supreme Court Orders Yesterday In Two Cases of Interest
Also yesterday in Holy See v. Doe, (Docket No. 09-1, Nov. 16, 2009) (Order List), the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on whether certiorari should be granted. In the case, the 9th Circuit held that the Vatican is not shielded by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act from a respondeat superior claim against it by a victim of a priest's sexual abuse. (See prior posting.) SCOTUS Blog discusses the Court's action.
Azerbaijan Official Reports On Status of Required Re-Registration of Religious Groups
Christian Groups Continue Objections To Hate Crimes Law
Suit Challenges Religious Activities In Tennessee County's Schools
44 Members of Congress Join Amicus Brief Supporting Engravings At Capitol Visitor Center
Monday, November 16, 2009
Group Challenges Indianapolis Schools' Internet Filtering Policy
Sites that promote and provide information on religions such as Wicca, Witchcraft or Satanism. Occult practices, atheistic views, vodoo rituals or any form of mysticism are represented here. Includes sites that ... [instruct in the use of] spells, incantations, curses and magic powers.FFRF contends that this policy amounts to viewpoint discrimination and a violation of the Establishment Clause because it allows access to sites offering information about Christianity and other mainstream religions, but not about atheism. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]
Obama Champions Human Rights At Town Hall Meeting In China
We do not seek to impose any system of government on any other nation, but we also don't believe that the principles that we stand for are unique to our nation. These freedoms of expression and worship -- of access to information and political participation -- we believe are universal rights.He also mentioned religion in responding to a student's question about Afghanistan and terrorism. The President said in part:
They should be available to all people, including ethnic and religious minorities -- whether they are in the United States, China, or any nation. Indeed, it is that respect for universal rights that guides America's openness to other countries; our respect for different cultures; our commitment to international law; and our faith in the future.
We also have to think about what motivates young people to become terrorists, why would they become suicide bombers. And although there are obviously a lot of different reasons, including I think the perversion of religion, in thinking that somehow these kinds of violent acts are appropriate, part of what's happened in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan is these young people have no education, they have no opportunities, and so they see no way for them to move forward in life, and that leads them into thinking that this is their only option.
FOIA Appeal Filed To Get Information On Bureau of Prisons Chapel Library Project
Rubashkin Encounters Religious Observance Problems In Jails After Trial
Chabad.info has a rather graphic account of the problems encountered by Rubashkin in maintaining his Orthodox Jewish religious observances during these moves. On the first night, South Dakota prison officials removed Rubashkin's tzitzis (fringed garment) despite Rubashkin's objections, and moved him in a wheel chair since he insisted he would not walk without wearing his tzitzis. Friday morning Federal marshals decided he could wear the tzitzis. Rubashkin's family had purchased kosher food meeting his strict standards. However, Sioux City jail officials refused to allow it in because it was not packaged correctly. Rubashkin went without food from Thursday night until Saturday evening when he got grape juice, rolls and soup mix that he ate cold. Rubashkin's family ask supporters to pray and recite psalms for him.
Recent Articles and Book of Interest
From SSRN:
- Bret Boyce, Equality and the Free Exercise of Religion, (Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 57, p. 493, 2008).
- Gila Stopler, Rights in Immigration: The Veil as a Test Case, (October 14, 2009).
- Marci A. Hamilton, Book Review: An Imperfect Vocabulary of Religious Liberty, Review of Martha C. Nussbaum, ed., Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America's Tradition of Religious Equality, (August 2, 2009).
- David B. Kopel & Clayton E. Cramer, The Keystone of the Second Amendment: Quakers, the Pennsylvania Constitution, and the Questionable Scholarship of Nathan Kozuskanich, (Widener Law Journal, Vol. 19, 2010).
- Michael J. Perry, Liberal Democracy and the Right to Religious Freedom, (The Review of Politics, Vol. 71, pp. 1-15, 2009).
- Richard T. Stith, Excluding Religion Excludes More than Religion, (Matters of Life and Death: Religion and Law at the Crossroad, Boston College Law School, 2008).
From SmartCILP and elsewhere:
- Christopher Hutton, Meaning, Time and the Law: Ex Post and Ex Ante Perspectives, 22 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 279-292 (2009).
- Massimo Leone, Massimo, The Semiotic Therapy of Religious Law, 22 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 293-306 (2009).
- The Journal of Church & State, Vol. 51, No. 1 (2009) has recently appeared.
Recent Book:
- Gary Hull (ed.), Muhammad: The "Banned" Images, (Voltaire Press, Oct. 2009), reviewed by Volokh Conspiracy.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Virginia Governor-Elect Called On To Repudiate Statements By Pat Robertson
Islam is a violent -- I was going to say religion, but it's not a religion. It's a political system. It's a violent political system bent on the overthrow of the governments of the world and world domination. I think we should treat it as such and treat its adherents as such, as we would members of the Communist Party or members of some fascist group.Today's Washington Post says McDonnell attended law school at Robertson's CBN University, and served on the university's board after it changed its name to Regent University. McDonnell received $40,000 in contributions from Robertson and his family for his election campaign. Mohamed Magid, imam of a mosque in Sterling, Virginia, said that Muslims want McDonnell "to distance himself from [Robertson's] remarks of hate...."
Windsor Police Chief Apologizes For Inappropriate Search of Muslim Woman
Orthodox Jews In Jerusalem Protest Intel's Sabbath Operations
Massachusetts Church Settles RLUIPA Lawsuit
Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Howard v. Epps, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105366 (SD MS, Oct. 30, 2009), a Mississippi federal magistrate judge permitted a Rastafarian inmate to amend his complaint to allege that the prison's grooming policy violates his First Amendment rights.
In O'Neal v. Brenes, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104852 (CD CA, Nov. 10, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge rejected an inmate's free exercise claim. Plaintiff alleged that he participates in the prison's vegan religious diet program and does not receive enough food. The court dismissed the claim because plaintiff failed to allege that his veganism is rooted in religious belief.
In Griffith v. Bird, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104469 (WD NC, Nov. 3, 2009), a North Carolina federal district court dismissed claims for both damages and an injunction by a Wiccan prisoner who claimed Wiccans were not allowed to have group religious services and that he was denied certain religious items. Corrections Department policy requires an approved volunteer to lead group religious services and vendors of religious items must go through an approval process.
In Haynes v. Sisto, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104532 (ED CA, Oct. 21, 2009), a California federal district court rejected a claim that authorities prevented black inmates from participating in religious activities during lockdowns. Plaintiff did not allege that he was prevented from practicing his religion.
In Flett v. Vail, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99765 (ED WA, Oct. 23, 2009), a Washington federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104255, Aug. 24, 2009), and dismissed claims of a native American inmate that prison officials failed to mail out certain religious items that he had properly processed for mailing. The court allowed plaintiff to move ahead with a RLUIPA challenge to prison regulations that prohibited use of animal fur, claws or bones for religious ceremonies. Plaintiff wished to use an eaglebone whistle.
In Hoffman v. Hennessey, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103406 (ND CA, Nov. 6, 2009), a California federal district court held that a Jewish prisoner had stated a cognizable claim under the First Amendment and RLUIPA that he was denied use of a yarmulke and tallit katan. He also was permitted to proceed with a retaliation claim against the Sheriff's Department.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Indian Tribe Sues Under Treaty To Get Prosecution of Self-Help Author
If bad men among the whites, or among other people subject to the authority of the United States, shall commit any wrong upon the person or property of the Indians, the United States will, upon proof made to the agent, and forwarded to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs at Washington city, proceed at once to cause the offender to be arrested and punished according to the laws of the United States, and also reimburse the injured person for the loss sustained.The complaint explains that a wrong was committed on the Lakota's property because the Oinikaga sweat lodge ceremony is part of the Lakota's oral tradition which, according to the United Nations Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Art. 31, the Lakotas have a right to maintain, control and protect.
Some Charge Anti-Semitism In Non-Renewal of Central Missouri University President
the thing that really upset me ... was, for years there was a Christmas tree lit at Selmo Park.... He stopped that. I mean I think every religion should be able to celebrate, uh, in their own way, but, I mean we do live in Warrensburg, Missouri. This is America. You know. Let’s bring that back....
Arizona Official Testifies On Loopholes In Tuition Tax Credit Law
Westboro Baptist Church Turns To Anti-Semitic Picketing
7th Circuit En Banc Upholds Cause of Action By Condo Owners Whose Mezuzah Was Banned
Evangelist Tony Alamo Sentenced To 175 Years On Mann Act Charges
Friday, November 13, 2009
US Sues To Seize Iranian Funded Mosqes and Schools In 4 US Cities
The forfeiture claim stems from allegations that the Alavi Foundation illegally funnelled millions of dollars of rental income to Iran's state-owned Bank Melli. It is illegal to do business with the bank in the U.S. under Executive Order 13382. The Executive Order blocks U.S. property of those who support proliferators of weapons of mass destruction. Bank Melli is among those that are listed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control as covered by the ban.
UPDATE: Today's Washington Post reports on federal marshals delivering notice that begins the seizure proceedings at the Islamic Education Center in Potomac, Maryland.
US Officials Repatriate Bible Taken By Nazis In Kristallnacht
North Carolina High Court Upholds Fees On Homes In Methodist Development
Justice Edmunds, concurring, emphasized the unique nature of the Lake Junaluska Development. Justice Hudson, dissenting, argued that "the restrictive covenants at issue do not contemplate any affirmative financial assessment on defendants" and the unique religious community character of the development should be irrelevant. The Lincoln (NC) Tribune reports on the decision.
Islamic Party Will Run Local Candidates In Spain In 2011
Australian Animal Rights Groups Dispute Ritual Slaughter Methods
According to the Sydney Morning Herald last week, Princess Alia bint al-Hussein of Jordan, sister to King Abdullah II, has written Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd urging him to withdraw the exemptions currently held by the four Australian plants. She says that killing without stunning is not required by Islamic law and that permitting it in Australia could undermine efforts in the Middle East to require stunning of animals before slaughter. Only a tiny percentage of meat exported from Australia is killed without stunning, but industry sources are concerned that the exemptions will tarnish the image of the entire industry in Australia. Australia's Meat Trade News Daily says that Australia's Fletcher International Exports-- the largest halal seep meat exporter in the world-- has convinced its customers to accept meat that has been killed with prior stunning of the animals. [Thanks to Steven H. Sholk for the lead.]
South Carolina Gubernatorial Hopeful Defends Christian Prayer At Council Meetings
Thursday, November 12, 2009
D.C. Catholic Archdiocese Threatens To End Social Services Over Gay Marriage Bill
The Washington Post this morning says that Catholic Charities serves 68,000 people in the District, including one-third of the homeless, who go to city-owned shelters managed by the Church. From 2006 to 2008, the Catholic Church received $8.2 million in city contracts, and supplemented city social service funding with $10 million per year of its own funds. Jane G. Belford, chancellor of the Washington Archdiocese, told City Council that: "All of those services will be adversely impacted if the exemption language remains so narrow." However, City Councilman David A. Catania said he would rather end the city's relationship with Catholic charities than give in to the Church's demands. [Thanks to both Steven H. Sholk and Scott Mange for the lead.]Under the bill, religious organizations do not have to participate in the "solemnization or celebration" of a same-sex marriage ceremony. An earlier version of the bill also exempted them from "the promotion of marriage that is in violation of the entity’s religious beliefs." The revised language significantly narrows that exemption to the "promotion of marriage through religious programs, counseling, courses, or retreats."
As a result, religious organizations and individuals are at risk of legal action for refusing to promote and support same-sex marriages in a host of settings where it would compromise their religious beliefs. This includes employee benefits, adoption services and even the use of a church hall for non-wedding events for same-sex married couples. Religious organizations such as Catholic Charities could be denied licenses or certification by the government, denied the right to offer adoption and foster care services, or no longer be able to partner with the city to provide social services for the needy.
Denmark's Muslims Face Political Opposition To Building of New Mosques
USCIRF Issues Policy Document Opposing UN Defamation of Religions Proposal
Although touted as a solution to the very real problems of religious persecution and discrimination, the OIC-sponsored UN resolutions on this issue instead provide justification for governments to restrict religious freedom and free expression. They also provide international legitimacy for existing national laws that punish blasphemy or otherwise ban criticism of a religion, which often have resulted in gross human rights violations. These resolutions deviate sharply from universal human rights standards by seeking to protect religious institutions and interpretations, rather than individuals, and could help create a new international anti-blasphemy norm.The United Nations General Assembly is expected to vote shortly on this year's version of the resolution on Combating Defamation of Religions (full text) sponsored in the General Assembly's Third Committee by Syria (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference), Belarus and Venezuela.
UPDATE: Europe News reported on Nov. 12 that the OIC has written a letter (full text) to the Chairman of the U.N. Committee on Complementary Standards defending its defamation of religions proposal against charges that it infringes on freedom of expression.
Idaho Charter School Rebuffs Document Request From State Commission
New York City Anti-Discrimination Law Given Broad Reading
British Case Focuses On Whether Belief In Psychics Is Protected Under Employment Equality Rules
I am satisfied that the claimant's beliefs that there is life after death and that the dead can be contacted through mediums are worthy of respect in a democratic society and have sufficient cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance to fall into the category of a philosophical belief for the purpose of the 2003 Regulations.The judge said that Power would still have to show that his firing was because of his belief, and not because he was inappropriately trying to press his beliefs on others. This case follows a decision last week by the Employment Appeals Tribunal that environmentalist beliefs could be covered by the equality regulations. (See prior posting.)