Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Andrew Koppelman, If Liberals Knew Themselves Better, Conservatives Might Like Them Better, (20 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 1201 (2017))
• Graham Polando, Restraining Free Exercise: Protection Orders and Church Attendance, (February 5, 2017).
• B. Jessie Hill, Kingdom Without End? The Inevitable Expansion of Religious Sovereignty Claims, (Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 20, 2017).
• Robin Fretwell Wilson, Unpacking the Relationship between Conscience and Access, (Forthcoming, Law, Religion, and Health in the United States, Holly Fernandez Lynch, I. Glenn Cohen, Elizabeth Sepper, eds. Cambridge U. Press 2017).
• Sahar F. Aziz, Losing the 'War of Ideas': A Critique of Countering Violent Extremism Programs, (Texas International Law Journal, Forthcoming).
• Christian Turner, Submarine Statutes, (February 8, 2017).
• Mary Anne Case, Forms of Patriarchy in Amoris Laetitia and in the Papacy of Francis, (U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 613 (2017)).
• Claudia E. Haupt, Antidiscrimination in the Legal Profession and the First Amendment: A Partial Defense of Model Rule 8.4(g), (19 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law Online (2017 Forthcoming)).
• Gertrude N. Levine & Samuel J. Levine, Internet Ethics, American Law, and Jewish Law: A Comparative Overview (21 J. Tech. L. & Pol’y 37 (2016)).

From SSRN (Focus on individuals):

• Andrew Koppelman, Kent Greenawalt, Defender of the Faith, (Texas Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Michael John DeBoer, Justice Brent E. Dickson, State Constitutional Interpretation, and the Religion Provisions of the Indiana Constitution, (Indiana Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2016).

From SSRN (Non-U.S. Law):

• Shital Prakash Kharat, Effect of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005 – Judicial Response, (February 6, 2017).
• Grant Robert Hooper, From the Magna Carta to Bentham to Modern Australian Judicial Review: Themes of Practicality and Spirituality, (Australian Institute of Administrative Law (AIAL) Forum, Vol. 84, pp. 22-44, 2016).

From SSRN (LGBT Rights):

• Reva Siegel, Same-Sex Marriage and Backlash: Consensus, Conflict, and Constitutional Culture, (February 9, 2017).
• Susan Frelich Appleton, Obergefell's Liberties: All in the Family, (Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 77, No. 5, 2016).
• Malcolm Langford, Revisiting Joslin v. New Zealand: Same-Sex Marriage in Polarised Times, (E. Brems and E. Desmet, Integrated Human Rights in Practice: Rewriting Human Rights Decisions (Edward Elgar, 2017)).
• Katherine Pratt, The Tax Definition of 'Medical Care': A Critique of the Startling IRS Arguments in O'Donnabhain v. Commissioner, (23 Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 313 (2016)).
• Robin Fretwell Wilson, Squaring Faith and Sexuality: Religious Institutions and the Unique Challenge of Sports, (Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, Vol. 34, No. 385, 2016).
• Robin Fretwell Wilson, The Nonsense About Bathrooms: How Purported Concerns over Safety Block LGBT Nondiscrimination Laws and Obscure Real Religious Liberty Concerns, (Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2017).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:

• Michael J. Churgin, Is Religion Different? Is There a Thumb on the Scale in Refugee Convention Appellate Court Adjudication in the United States? Some Preliminary Thoughts, [Abstract], 51 Texas International Law Journal 213-228 (2016).
• David L. Hudson, Jr. & Emily H. Harvey, Dissecting The Hybrid Rights Exception: Should It Be Expanded or Rejected?, [Abstract], 38 University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review 449-475 (2016).
• Hon. Gail T. Kulick, Tadd M. Johnson, Rebecca St. George, & Emily Segar-Johnson, From Dysfunction and Polarization to Legislation: Native American Religious Freedom Rights and Minnesota Autopsy Law, 42 Mitchell Hamline Law Reveiw 1699-1721 (2016).
• Law, Religion and the Family Unit After Hobby Lobby: A Tribute to Professor Harry Krause, 2016 University of Illinois Law Review 1227-1808.
• Symposium: Law and Religion In an Increasingly Polarized America,(Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vo. 20, No. 4, 2017).
• Symposium on Religious Liberty and Christian Higher Education, (Two Kingdoms Network, Concordia University, 2017). The Symposium, among others, includes Howard M. Friedman, The Future of Religious Liberty.

Court Denies Freedom of Information Request Relating To NYPD Surveillance of Muslims

In Asian American Legal Defense & Education Fund v. New York City Police Department, (NY Sup. Ct., May 6, 2013), a New York trial court upheld the NYPD's rejection of a Freedom of Information Law request by two groups seeking to learn more about the city's domestic surveillance program that targeted Muslims.  The groups sought information regarding record keeping and retention, policy guidelines and statistics related to the surveillance. The court said that the city properly relied on the statutory exemption for information "compiled for law enforcement purposes and which, if disclosed, would: (i) interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings; [or] (iii) identify a confidential source or disclose confidential information relating to a criminal investigation; or (iv) reveal criminal investigative techniques or procedures ." The court also identified several other exceptions that would justify denial of parts of the FOIL request. The New York Daily News reports on the decision.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Machtfeld Zee, Five Options for the Relationship between the State and Sharia Councils: Untangling the Debate on Sharia Councils and Women's Rights in the United Kingdom, (Journal of Religion and Society, Volume 16 (2014)).
• Cambria Queen, Is God in the United States?, (September 26, 2013).
• Caroline Mala Corbin, Corporate Religious Liberty: Why Corporations Are Not Entitled to Religious Exemptions, (American Constitution Society Issue Brief, January 2014).
• Haim Sandberg, From JNF to Viva Palestina – UK Policy Towards Zionist and Palestinian Charities, (January 23, 2014).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:

• Audun Kjus, Adam and Lucifer: A Royal Example, 25 Law & Literature 466-482 (2013).
• David B. Kopel, Evolving Christian Attitudes Towards Personal and National Self-Defense, 45 Connecticut Law Review 1709-1771 (2013).
• Benjamin Porat, Lethal Self-Defense Against a Rapist and the Challenge of Proportionality: Jewish Law Perspective, 26 Columbia Journal of Gender & Law 123-181 (2013).
• Moshe Simon-Shoshan, "People Talking Without Speaking": The Semiotics of Rabbinic Legal Exemplum As Reflected in Bavli Berakhot 11a, 25 Law & Literature 446-465 (2013).
• Alan E. Garfield, The Contraception Mandate Debate: Achieving a Sensible Balance, Columbia Law Review, January 2014 Sidebar.
• Knox Thames, A Global Response to Religious Freedom Violations, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Jan. 2014.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Marc Spindelman, Stirrings of a Conservative Christian Rule of Law [in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA,  (The American Prospect (May 29, 2023)).
• Lucia Ann Silecchia, Property and Moral Responsibilities: Some Reflections on Modern Catholic Social Theory, (Texas A&M University Journal of Property Law, Vol. 9, Pp. 733-56, 2023).
• Adan Zulfiqar, Human Rights Norms from Below, (Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2023).
• J. Alex Touchet & Bradley J, Lingo, Failure to Accommodate: Assessing the Legacy of Trans World Airlines v. Hardison on Working-Class People of Faith, (George Mason Law Review Forum (Forthcoming)).
• Ajay Kumar, Two Different But Same Perspectives On Constitutional Morality, ((2022 Winter) ILI Law Review 258-275).
• Michael L. Smith, Idaho's Law of Constitutional Interpretation: Lessons from Planned Parenthood Great Northwest v. State, (Idaho Law Review, Vol. 59, Forthcoming).
• Linda C. McClain & James E. Fleming, Ordered Liberty after Dobbs, (Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 623 (2023)).
• Qaz Irfan, Riba in Shariah, (May 14, 2023).

From SSRN (Articles & Book Introductions by John Witte, Emory Center for Study of Law & Religion);

• John Witte, The Protestant Reformation of Constitutionalism, (in Nicholas Aroney and Ian Leigh, eds., Christianity and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), 126-48).
• John Witte, “Foreword” to Festschrift for Michael J. Perry,  (Emory Law Journal 71 (2022): i-iv).
• John Witte, “Foreword,” to Franciszek Longchamps de Bérier and Rafael Domingo, eds., Law and Christianity in Poland: The Legacy of the Great Jurists, (London: Routledge, 2022), ix-xii ).
• John Witte, Religious Freedom in Religious Education, (Advance (Fall, 2022), 1-10).
• John Witte, “Foreword,” to Zachary Calo, Joshua Neoh and Keith Thompson, eds.,Christianity, Ethics, and the Law: The Concept of Love in Christian Legal Thought,, (London: Routledge, 2023), xi-xiii).
• John Witte, “We Must Obey God Rather Than Men”: Lutheran Resistance Against Pope and Emperor in the Reformation Era, (in David Gides, ed., Uncivil Disobedience: Theological Perspectives (Minneapolis: Lexington Books, 2023), 75-92).
• John Witte, Introduction to In Defense of the Marital Family (Leiden: Brill, 2023), 1-5).
• John Witte, Biblical Foundations of Human Rights and Liberties, (Jahrbuch für biblische Theologie (with Eric Wang) , CSLR Research Paper No. __ Forthcoming).
• John Witte & Rafael Domingo Osle, Preface to Oxford Handbook on Christianity and Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).
• John Witte & Mathias Schmoeckel, Christianity and Procedural Law,  (in John Witte, Jr. and Rafael Domingo, eds., Oxford Handbook on Christianity and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming)).

From SmartCILP:

• Philip A. Miscimarra, NLRA Coverage—The Search for Answers: Student Assistants, Religious Universities, Charter Schools, and Independent Contractors, 36 ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law 25-74 (2022).
• Henry Amorosa, Paula Alexander Becker & Evan Weiss, A Social Contract: The Doctrine of Unconscionability and Its Relation to Social Progress, 28 Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice 51-78 (2021).
• R. George Wright, Free Speech and Antisemitism: Collin v. Smith Today, 20 First Amendment Law Review (2022).
• John M. Breen & Lee J. Strang, A Light Unseen: The History of Catholic Legal Education in the United States: A Response to Our Colleagues and Critics, 59 Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 1-50 (2020).
• David. A Dailge & Daniel V. Goff, Beyond Lawyer Assistance Programs: Applying the United States Marine Corps' Concepts and Principles of Spiritual Fitness as a Means towards Increasing the Health, Resiliency and Well-Being of Lawyers—While Restoring the Soul of the Profession, 59 Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 51-92 (2020).

Compromise On Chaplains In Defense Appropriations Act

On Friday, Congress passed the FY 2007 Defense Appropriations Act before it adjourned for its election break. The bill had been held up over language on military chaplains. The House version would have assured chaplains that they could pray according to the dictates of their own conscience, except for narrow limitations compelled by military necessity. (See prior posting.) The Senate version did not contain this language. The Conference Committee eliminated completely from the bill any language about chaplains. However the Conference Committee Report included language directing the Air Force and the Navy to rescind recent policies that they had adopted, and requiring them to reinstate earlier policies:

The conferees direct that the Secretary of the Air Force rescind the policy and revised interim guidelines concerning the exercise of religion in the Air Force issued on February 9, 2006, and direct that the Secretary of the Air Force reinstate the policy that was set fort in Air Force directive 52-1 dated 1 July 1999. The conferees further direct that the Secretary of the Navy rescind Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1730.7C dated February 21, 2006, titled "Religious Ministry within the Department f the Navy" and direct that the Secretary of the Navy reinstate the policy that was set forth in the Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1730.7B dated October 12, 2000.

The regulations that Congress ordered rescinded had been explicit in calling on chaplains to offer non-sectarian prayers when officiating at military events other than religious services. The earlier versions that are to be reinstated are less explicit on this issue. (Background on Navy policy. Background on Air Force policy.)

This is merely a temporary solution, however, to the debate over the extent to which military chaplains should be permitted to offer explicitly sectarian prayers at service-wide ceremonies with interfaith audiences. Those on both sides claimed that the compromise was a temporary victory. Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice said:

In a temporary victory, Congress rolled back those regulations that were causing the difficulty for the chaplains and reinstated earlier regulations that were more protective of the free exercise of religion. Congress also said that they will visit this issue fully in January when the new Congress returns. We anticipate major hearings on these issues.

On the other side, Mikey Weinstein, founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation said that keeping the House language out of the final bill was a victory.

Recent Articles and Books on Law & Religion, Church-State

From SSRN:

• Ira C. Lupu & Robert W. Tuttle, Ball on a Needle: Hein V. Freedom from Religion Foundation and the Future of Establishment Clause Adjudication, (Brigham Young University Law Review, Forthcoming Feb. 2008).
  
• David B. Kopel, Self-Defense in Asian Religions, (Liberty Law Review, Vol. 2, p. 79, 2007).
  
• David R. Barnhizer & Daniel D. Barnhizer, Myth, Magic and Mystery: Defending the Hidden Order of the Rule of Law, (Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 07-149, Oct. 16, 2007).
  
• John Copeland Nagle, The Evangelical Debate Over Climate Change, (University of St. Thomas Law Journal, Forthcoming).
  
• JoEllen Lind, What Counts as Neutrality? The Religion and Race Cases Compared, (Valparaiso University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-04).
  
• David B. Kopel, Dhimmitude and Disarmament, (George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, Forthcoming).
  
• Steven Douglas Smith, How Is America 'Divided by God'?, (Mississippi College Law Review, Vol. 27, 2007).

From SmartCILP:

• Ryan Spear, What We Talk About When We Talk About God (Reviewing Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion; Sam Harris, Letter to a Christian Nation; and E. O. Wilson, The Creation: An Appeal to Save Life on Earth), 1 Harvard Law & Policy Review 495-506 (2007).

Recent Books:

• Forrest Church, So Help Me God: The Founding Fathers and the First Great Battle Over Church and State, (Harcourt, Sept. 10, 2007), reviewed by the Deseret Morning News.
  
• D. Michael Lindsay, Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evagelicals Joined the American Elite, (Oxford Univ. Press, Aug. 2007), reviewed in the Wall Street Journal.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Thomas C. Berg, Agape, Gift, and Intellectual Property, (U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-19 (2015)).
• Russell Powell, Does Shari'a Play a Role in Turkey?, (Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 41, No. Special Issue, 2014).
• Robin L. West, Hobby Lobby, Birth Control and Our Ongoing Cultural Wars: Pleasure and Desire in the Crossfires, (2015).
• Cheryl L. Daytec, Till the Judge Do Them Part: The Prospect of Absolute Divorce in the Philippines, (August 19, 2015).
• Shai Stern, When One's Right to Marry Makes Others 'Unmerry', (Albany Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Alan E. Garfield, And the Wall Comes Tumbling Down: How the Supreme Court Is Striking the Wrong Balance between Majority and Minority Rights in Church and State Cases, Arkansas Law Review, Forthcoming.
• Mark Rahdert, Exceptionalism Unbound: Appraising American Resistance to Foreign Law, (Catholic University Law Review, (Forthcoming)).
• Tessa McKeown, Hate Speech and Holocaust Denial: The Prohibition of False Historical Discourse in Modern Society, (2014).
• Kit Kinports, The Supreme Court's Quiet Expansion of the Qualified Immunity Defense, (Minnesota Law Review Headnotes, Forthcoming).
• Rebecca Eaton, The Legitimacy of Spectral Evidence During the Salem Witchcraft Trials, (2013).

From SmartCILP:

• Winston Bowman, A Civil Death: Mormon Disenfranchisement in the Inter-Mountain West, 27 Western Legal History 1-29 (2014).
• Inna Nam Brady, Religious Freedom in Kazakhstan: Facing the Kazakhstani Law on Religious Activities and Religious Associations, 1 Journal of Global Justice & Public Policy 227-246 (2015).
• Joshua Neoh, The Name of God On Trial: Narratives of Law, Religion and State in Malaysia, 18 Law Text Culture 198-220 (2014).
• Tilhamer Toth,, Is There a Vatican School for Competition Policy?, 46 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 583-616 (2015).
• James M. Oleske, Jr., The Evolution of Accommodation: Comparing the Unequal Treatment of Religious Objections to Interracial and Same-Sex Marriages, 50 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 99-152 (2015).
• Sahar F Aziz, Coercive Assimilationism: The Perils of Muslim Women's Identity Performance in the Workplace, 20 Michigan Journal of  Race & Law 1-64 (2014). 

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Monika Ambrus, The European Court of Human Rights and Standards of Proof in Religion Cases, (8 Religion and Human Rights 2 (2013), pp. 107-137, Forthcoming).
• Perry Dane, Doctrine and Deep Structure in the Contraception Mandate Debate,(July 21, 2013).
• Charles Tiefer, Jonathan W. Cuneo & Annie Reiner, Could This Train Make It Through: The Law and Strategy of the Gold Train Case, (Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, Vol. 15, 2012, pp. 129-154).
• Ian C. Bartrum, Religion and the Restatements, (Brooklyn Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Richard W. Garnett, 'The Freedom of the Church': (Towards) an Exposition, Translation, and Defense, (Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, Forthcoming (2013)).

From SmartCILP:

• Todd A. DeMitchell, David J. Herbert & Loan T. Phan, The University Curriculum and the Constitution: Personal Beliefs and Professional Ethics in Graduate School Counseling Programs, 39 Journal of College and University Law 303-345 (2013).
• Jane C. Ginsburg, Proto-property in Literary and Artistic Works: Sixteenth-Century Papal Printing Privileges, 36 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 345-458 (2013).
• The Lautsi Debate -- Fin. Articles by Dimitrios Kyritsis, Stavros Tsakyrakis and Lorenzo Zucca; reply by J.H.H. Weiler. 11 I.Con: International Journsal of Constitutional Law 200-233 (2013).

Recent Books:

• Vincent Phillip Munoz, Religious Liberty and the American Supreme Court: The Essential Cases and Documents, (Rowman & Littlefield, July 2013).
• Robin Griffith-Jones (ed.), Islam and English Law: Rights, Responsibilities and the Place of Shari’a, (Cambridge Univ. Press, May 2013), Reviewed by Financial Times.

Italian Suit Challenging Baptism Dropped

In Italy, the Union of Rationalist Atheists and Agnostics has dropped a lawsuit on behalf of a plaintiff who was attempting to have his name deleted from a baptism register. The suit challenged the right of parents to have their children baptized. According to World Net Daily, the suit alleged that since the law does not allow parents to enroll their children in organizations like labor unions, parents should also not be able to decide that their children should become members of religious associations. The complaint cited protection of children's religious freedom and Italian Constitutional Court precedents on free will and personal privacy in religious decisions. Alliance Defense Fund, which was involved in convincing the group to drop its lawsuit as frivolous, warned that while "such lawsuits may seem far-fetched, ... foreign legal decisions are increasingly cited in American courts."

Senate Passes DADT Repeal for Obama's Signature; Opponents Vow To Fight On

AP reports that the U.S. Senate today voted 65-31 to approve and send to the President for his signature the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010. An identical bill was passed by the House earlier this week. (See prior posting.) The bill provides for ending of DADT 60 days after the President, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify that implementation is consistent with military effectiveness and readiness, unit cohesion and recruiting and retention. The President has promised to sign the bill into law. Earlier today he issued a statement reading in part:

It is time to recognize that sacrifice, valor and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed. It is time to allow gay and lesbian Americans to serve their country openly. I urge the Senate to send this bill to my desk so that I can sign it into law.

In response to the Senate's action,  the Freedom Federation, a coalition of conservative religious and public policy groups issued a statement promising to fight for a reversal of Congress' action, saying:

Our armed forces should take heart, because the American people will not turn its back on you. This vote happened because opportunistic Senators – only days before Christmas – put political interest groups above supporting our men and women in uniform.

This action will be overturned in the next Congress because it breaks the bond of trust that must exist between the military and those who command in the Pentagon and Congress. Today’s vote will prove as costly to its proponents as ObamaCare was to its advocates. We promise a full mobilization of faith-based and policy organizations, veterans, and military families in the states of every Senator who voted for repeal of DADT against the advice of our service chiefs and during a time of war. Those Senators – and the Pentagon leaders responsible for this breach of trust – should understand that they will be the object of concerted political action against them.

Top 10 Church-State and Religious Liberty Developments For 2012

Here are my nominations for the 2012 Top Ten Church-State and Religious Liberty Developments:

1.  The long-simmering tensions between the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Obama Administration took on a greater focus when in May some 40 Catholic institutions, in 12 lawsuits, filed challenges to the Obama administration's mandate that health insurance policies include contraceptive coverage. Other suits followed. The Administration had granted a one-year moratorium to non-profit institutions, while it worked unsuccessfully to produce a compromise that might be acceptable to religiously affiliated non-profit institutions. Meanwhile, for-profit companies owned by Catholics and conservative Christians also filed an avalanche of suits seeking conscience exemptions from the mandate.

2.  The battle between religious conservatives and advocates of marriage equality continued to rage on numerous fronts.  Each side saw some victories and some defeats, but proponents of marriage equality had a good year.  Legislatures in Washington and Maryland approved same-sex marriage. In November, voters in 4 states also indicated approval of same-sex marriage, but earlier in the year North Carolina voters approved a ban on same-sex marriage.. The 9th Circuit in a narrow opinion struck down California's Proposition 8, and the Supreme Court has agreed to review that decision. The Defense of Marriage Act was struck down by the 1st Circuit, the 2nd Circuit and a California federal district court. The Supreme Court has agreed to review the 2nd Circuit case. Same-sex marriage bans in Nevada and Hawaii were upheld by federal district courts.

 3.  Mitt Romney lost the Presidential election, but his Mormon religious faith was not an important issue in the campaign. Indeed, Romney's activities as a lay Mormon pastor were used to his advantage at the Republican Convention.

4. The Supreme Court in Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC adopted the "ministerial exception" doctrine for employment discrimination cases, finding it to be constitutionally-based.

5.  Egypt has struggled to draft and adopt a new constitution.  The role the new constitution will provide for Sharia law in the country has been one of the central issues in debates on the document.

6.  A 17-year long struggle by the New York City Board of Education to bar churches from renting out school buildings on weekends for church services, even though the buildings are available to other community groups, was revived by a federal district judge. Most observers had thought that a 2011 decision by the 2nd Circuit had ended the dispute in favor of the Board of Education, but the court held that the 2nd Circuit had not passed on the Bronx Household of Faith's free exercise and establishment clause claims. The district court's vindication of the free exercise claim is now on appeal.

7.  An online video promoting the obscure movie "Innocence of Muslims" triggers demonstrations against American embassies in the Muslim world. The video leads to an unusual set of legal proceedings-- litigation involving probation violations by the producer, attempt by an actress in the movie to have it removed from YouTube, and in abstentia convictions in Egypt.

8.  New questions are raised around the world regarding ritual circumcision of young boys by Muslims and Jews. Germany's Bundestag confirmed the legality of religious circumcision after a Cologne district court held that parents lack the right to decide that their young sons should be circumcised for non-medical reasons. Ritual circumcision is also questioned in Australia and Norway. Meanwhile, in the United States some Orthodox Jewish groups sue challenging the New York City health department's new regulation requiring informed consent from parents when a Jewish religious circumcision involves use of the oral suction technique (metzitzah b'peh).

9.  The court martial trial of accused Fort Hood mass shooter Maj. Nidal Hasan is delayed as the question of his right to wear a beard for religious reasons at his trial is litigated.  In December, an appeals court held there was insufficient evidence to show that the beard materially interfered with the court martial proceedings. It also ordered court martial judge Gregory Gross removed from the case for the appearance of bias.

10.  In the wake of Congress' reorganization of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom in late 2011, developments demonstrated internal divisions and conflicts in the Commission. The pressure of expiring terms of 5 Commissioners led to early release of USCIRF's annual report and to a public statement by 5 of the Commissioners charging that the report wrongly reflected the votes of Commissioners on the status of Turkey.  Meanwhile a former USCIRF staff member sued alleging anti-Muslim bias against her.  In an unrelated case, a different employee was sentenced to prison for embezzling USCIRF funds. And Muslim groups criticized one of the new Commissioners, claiming he is anti-Muslim.

Some of my picks were rather obvious candidates for inclusion, while others may surprise some readers. A number of the top developments continue trends reflected in last year's list.  You may also find it interesting to compare two other "Top 10" lists: Religion Newswriters 2012 Top 10 Religion Stories and Blog from the Capital's Top Religious Liberty Stories of 2012. I invite you to post your comments or disagreements with my choices this year.

Advocacy Groups Say Military Is Imposing Religious Participation On Cadets

The Freedom From Religion Foundation and American Atheists announced this week that they have sent a joint letter (full text) to Secretary of Defense James Mattis complaining about an increased incidence of military members and their families being forced to participate in religious observances at military training facilities. The letter says in part:

By scheduling prayer in graduation ceremonies, and by leading cadets in prayer prior to examinations, our military training facilities are violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. By assigning menial or labor-intensive tasks to cadets who elect not to participate in worship services, these facilities are violating the equal protection principles enshrined in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

Friendly Atheist Blog reports on the letter.

Court Rejects Free Exercise Defense To Bald Eagle Act Prosecution

In United States v. Bertucci, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119228 (D NE, Dec. 22, 2009), a Nebraska federal district court accepted the recommendations of a federal magistrate (2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119230, Nov. 25, 2009) and denied a motion to dismiss charges under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act that had been brought against defendant. Defendant, a member of the Omaha Tribe and the Native American Church, claimed that the charges violated his free exercise rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Without a permit, he killed two bald eagles to use in a feathering ceremony for his children that he wished to conduct while his grandfather was still alive. Eagle parts are available to members of recognized tribes from the National Eagle Repository. The court held:

[T]he repository and permit processes, while arguably inconvenient, do not impose a substantial burden on the defendant's right to practice his religion. The evidence established that a tribal member would have to wait ninety days to six months for delivery of feathers from the repository. This moderate delay does not deny the defendant a reasonable opportunity to practice his religion. Alternatively, the court finds that even if the Eagle Protection Act imposed a substantial burden, the government has met its burden to show that the repository and permit process are the least restrictive means to further the government's compelling interest in protecting and preserving the bald eagle population.

Iran Sentences Pastor To 8 Years In Prison

Reuters reported yesterday that Iranian-American Christian pastor Saeed Abedini has been sentenced to 8 years in prison by an Iranian court after his attorney had only one day to present his defense to charges of threatening Iran's national security through his leadership in Christian house churches. A U.S. State Department spokesman said: "We condemn Iran's continued violation of the universal right of freedom of religion and we call on the Iranian authorities to respect Mr. Abedini's human rights and release him." (See prior related posting.)

Likely Civil Rights Division Head Disclosed

Legal Times reported Friday that the likely nominee to head the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division in the Obama administration is Thomas Saenz, counsel to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. The likely nominee, a Yale Law School graduate, worked at the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund prior to joining Mayor Villaraigosa's administration. The Civil Rights Division enforces federal anti-discrimination statutes, including bans on religious discrimination.

Meanwhile the Justice Department has released a publication, The Accomplishments of the U.S. Department of Justice 2001-2009. It lauds its comprehensive initiative to protect religious freedom, and its creation of a new position of Special Counsel for Religious Discrimination. The Civil Rights Division prioritized investigation of bias crimes against Muslims, Sikhs, Arabs and South Asians, and developed a comprehensive program for enforcement of RLUIPA.

Second Lawsuit Against Georgia County Filed Over Zoning Denial For Churches

For the second time this year (see prior posting), a federal lawsuit has been filed against Coweta County, Georgia challenging its denial of a conditional use permit to a predominately African-American church. At issue in the latest suit is the county's refusal to allow Holy Is The Way Ministries to build a church on a rural tract of land it has contracted to purchase. The county Board of Commissioners denied the church's application, rejecting a recommendation of the Board of Zoning Appeals.  The complaint (full text) in Holiness Is The Way Ministries, Inc. v. Coweta County, Georgia, (ND GA, filed 4/13/2011), alleges violations of RLUIPA as well as numerous constitutional violations. Among other claims, plaintiffs charge that the provision in the county's zoning ordinance that calls for churches and other places of worship to obtain a conditional use permit to locate in areas zoned Rural Conservation is unconstitutional.  The complaint alleges that since this requires the county to analyze the content of speech and other expressive activity in order to determine whether a gathering is "a Church or other place of worship," this violates the 1st Amendment's protection of freedom of expression as well as the Establishment Clause. Alliance Defense Fund issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit.

Recent Articles and Books-- Religion & State In U.S. and Abroad

Articles: (from SmartCILP):

• Robert John Araujo, S.J., The Transnational Perspective of the Church: The Embryonic Cloning Debate and Stem Cell Research, 22 Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy 497-507 (2006).
  
• Jonathan F. Wills, My God My Choice: The Mature Minor Doctrine and Adolescent Refusal of Life-Saving or Sustaining Medical Treatment Based Upon Religious Beliefs, 22 Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy 233-300 (2006).

Recent Books on Church-State Issues in the U.S.:

• Tracy Fessenden, Culture and Redemption: Religion, the Secular, and American Literature, (Princeton University Press, Nov. 2006).
  
• Christopher L. Eisgruber & Lawrence G. Sager, Religious Freedom and the Constitution, (Harvard University Press, Jan. 2007).

Recent Books on Religion and State In Europe and Asia:

• John T. Sidel, Riots, Pogroms, Jihad: Religious Violence in Indonesia, (Cornell University Press, Dec. 2006).
  
• Paul A. Hanebrink, In Defense of Christian Hungary: Religion, Nationalism, and Antisemitism, 1890–1944, (Cornell University Press, Aug. 2006).
  
• Genevieve Zubrzycki, The Crosses of Auschwitz: Nationalism and Religion in Post-Communist Poland, (University of Chicago Press, Fall 2006).
  
• Mujiburrahman, Feeling Threatened: Muslim-Christian Relations in Indonesia’s New Order, (Amsterdam University Press, 2006).

Two Interesting New Online Sites Created

Two new interesting websites have just come on line. The first is Faithful Democrats. In an introductory posting, Tennessee Senator Roy Herron says:

I am tired of politicians, partisans, and preachers spelling God "G-O-P." But make no mistake — regardless of how wrong they are or how false their doctrine is, they have been frighteningly effective. Now many Americans think Jesus never rode a donkey and today rides only an elephant. The truth is, God cannot be held hostage by any political party. And American Christians should not be either.

The AP yesterday reported on the Democrats' new online initiative. [Thanks to Mainstream Baptist for the lead.]

The second entry into cyberspace is a new blog from the Alliance Defense Fund (news release), called ConstitutionallyCorrect.com. The blog has been created to focus on issues of concern to ADF, such as religious freedom in order to be able to spread the Gospel, the sanctity of human life and traditional family values. (See ADF's website.)

Both sites have been added to Religion Clause's sidebar.