Evangelical Leaders Are Supportive After Palin Says Her Unmarried Daughter Is Pregnant

Within hours after Republican vice-presidential choice Sarah Palin announced that her unmarried 17-year old daughter is pregnant and will marry the father of the child, two leading pro-life religious leaders have issued statements supporting Palin. Dr. Richard Land, President of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, quoted by CBN News said in part:

This is the pro-life choice. The fact that people will criticize her for this shows the astounding extent to which the secular critics of the pro-life movement just don’t get it. Those who criticize the Palin family don’t understand that we don’t see babies as a punishment but as a blessing....

Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family, in a statement quoted in full by ABC News said in part:

... [T]he Palins should be commended once again for not just talking about their pro-life and pro-family values, but living them out.... Being a Christian does not mean you're perfect. Nor does it mean your children are perfect. But it does mean there is forgiveness and restoration when we confess our imperfections to the Lord.... The media are already trying to spin this as evidence Gov. Palin is a 'hypocrite,' but all it really means is that she and her family are human.

Reuters has further coverage of Palin's announcement. David Brody writing at CBN News says more broadly that the Palin developments will be a positive, not a negative, with Evangelicals. A Washington Post analysis says it is too early to definitively reach that conclusion.

British Museum Covers Paragraph Explaining Darwin

In Britain's Northampton, the Abington Park Museum operated by the Northampton Borough Council is in the midst of a controversy over a display on Darwin and fossils. The Northampton Chronicle & Echo reported last week that the museum was instructed to cover up one paragraph of an explanatory sign after a complaint by a religious fundamentalist. The Council said it was also concerned about poor syntax in the paragraph. The first two paragraphs of the sign explain that Darwin challenged the Biblical view of early geologists that fossils showed successive waves of creation. The objectionable paragraph then said: "[Darwin] used the same layers of fossils that had supported the Genesis view of evolution to show the slow changes that are taking place over the millennia of earth history, each small change enabling a species to the rigours of it's (sic) environment – the struggle for survival through natural selection leading to the survival of the fittest." [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

UPDATE: The National Secular Society reports (Sept. 1) that Northampton Council has ordered a new, corrected sign to replace the one that has been partially covered. The new wording is similar to the old, but omits reference to the Genesis view of evolution. Council head Tony Woods said the original sign was covered over by the previous administration because it was factually incorrect. [Again thanks to Scott Mange.]

Recent Scholarly Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Caitlin E. Borgmann, The Meaning of "Life": Belief and Reason in the Abortion Debate (August 30, 2008).


• Anthony D'Amato, Contested Morality: Judge Posner on Infanticide, Slavery, Suttee, Female Genital Mutilation, and the Holocaust , Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 08-27 (Aug. 25, 2008).


• Johnny Rex Buckles, Does the Constitutional Norm of Separation of Church and State Justify the Denial of Tax Exemption to Churches that Engage in Partisan Political Speech?, Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 84, (2009).

From SmartCILP:

• Daniel L. Dreisbach, The "Wall of Separation" Motif in Biblical Literature and Western Political and Legal Thought, 2 Liberty University Law Review 79-106 (2007).


• Martin Pritkin, The Value of Talmud Study to Modern Legal Education, 21 Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 351-386 (2007).


• Sacred Violence: Religion and Terror. Foreword by Jessie Hill and student Adam F. Kinney; articles by Louis Rene Beres, J. S. Piven, Parvez Ahmed and Gregory S. McNeal. 39 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 703-826 (2007-2008).

Brazilian Court Orders Withdrawal of Playboy After Priest Complains

In Brazil, a judge has ordered Playboy Brazil to recall its August issue because a photograph in it "hurts the feelings of believers". Brazzil Magazine reported Sunday that the Pela Vida Catholic youth institute and a priest filed a complaint after the recent issue of Playboy sold in the country carried a photograph of actress Carol Castro posing semi-nude with a rosary. The court also ordered Playboy to avoid using religious elements in future articles that include nudes. The magazine has not yet been withdrawn from news stands because Playboy Brazil has not yet been formally notified of the order.

Faith-Based Groups Likely To Be Important After Hurricane Gustav

The Christian Post reports today that faith-based organizations are among those preparing to move into areas that are affected by Hurricane Gustav that is threatening the Louisiana coast. World Vision has pre-positioned supplies as has the Salvation Army. Somewhat presciently, the Institute for Southern Studies just released in August a report titled Faith in the Gulf: Lessons From the Religious Response to Hurricane Katrina. The report concludes that: "More than any other nongovernmental sector—and in many cases, better than government agencies—faith organizations were able to quickly and effectively deliver the people and resources needed to help storm victims in need." The Durham (NC) Herald-Sun summarizes the report.

President Issues Ramadan Greetings To Muslims

On Friday, President Bush issued a Message (full text) sending greetings to Muslims observing Ramadan in the U.S. and around the world. The Message reads in part:

I thank the men and women of the Muslim community for their contributions to America. Your love of family, and gratitude to God have strengthened the moral fabric of our country. Our Nation is stronger and more hopeful because of the generosity, talents, and compassion of our Muslim citizens.

The observance of Ramadan begins tomorrow. Islam Online discusses the complicated determination of the starting date for Ramadan around the world. Today's Washington Post has a long article detailing the activity of one of Egypt's seven official moon sighting committees as it combines religion and science in determining the start of the month-long dawn-to-dusk fast.

FLDS Church Sues UEP Trustee

According to yesterday's Deseret News, the Fundamentalist LDS church, abandoning its stratgy of non-participation, filed suit on Friday in a Utah court to challenge a default judgment that the court awarded against its leaders in 2007. In 2005, the court took control of the United Effort Plan trust, the trust that held title to property of the FLDS church, after it was alleged that church leaders, including Warren Jeffs, had mismanaged it. The court appointed Bruce Wissan as fiduciary, and he sued the former UEP trustees for $8.8 million in damages. They failed to respond and a default judgment was entered. Now, however, the church and its leaders-- concerned that the church is facing destruction-- say the default judgment was obtained through fraudulent misrepresentation to the court of property values and transactions.

Controversy In Italy Over Museum's Exclusion of Veiled Muslim Woman

In Italy, controversy has broken out over the decision by a museum guard to deny admission to a Muslim woman who was wearing a niqab that left only her eyes visible. Friday's London Times reports that a guard at Venice's Ca Rezzonico invoked security regulations, and politicians have weighed in on both sides of the dispute. However the security firm involved says that in the future, all Venice museums will set aside a private room where female guards can check the identity of veiled Muslim women.

Rabbi In Zoning Dispute With New Jersey Township Over Services In His Home

This week's New Jersey Jewish Standard reports on a zoning dispute in Teaneck (NJ) over the use by a rabbi of his home for religious services. The house was purchased in October 2007 by Etz Chaim of Teaneck which hired Rabbi Daniel Feldman as its leader and rented the house to him. Feldman began in November to hold services in his living room. Neighbors petitioned the township, but it took no action, apparently in reliance on a 1985 New Jersey Superior Court case, Farhi v. Comm'rs of Deal [Lexis link], that held the state's constitution prohibits a municipality from using its zoning power to prohibit the free exercise of religious activity in the privacy of one's home.

On July 18, Feldman moved the services from his living room to his family room. The township's zoning ordinance requires a zoning permit where there has been a "change in use" of a piece of property. Neighbors filed a second petition saying that the July 18 move of the services-- now attended by 20 to 25 families-- was a change in use. Feldman says that the services on Friday evening and Saturday morning (as well as holidays) only total about 5 hours per week-- about 3% of the time-- too little to constitute a change in use. In a letter, however, the Teaneck zoning officer told Feldman to cease and desist from using the premises as a house of worship or place of public assembly. Feldman, who argues that this is still merely a protected private prayer group, has filed an appeal with the township zoning board.

8th Circuit Interprets Non-Curriculum Group For Purposes of Equal Access

In Straights and Gays for Equality (SAGE) v. Osseo Area Schools, (8th Cir., Aug. 29, 2008), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted the federal Equal Access Act. The statute requires that high schools receiving federal funds must treat all non-curriculum related groups alike in granting access to school premises. Discrimination on the basis of the religious, philosophical, political or other content of speech at meetings of a student group is banned. Applying a definition of non-curriculum related groups developed by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 1990 case, the 8th Circuit decided that another school group that plans school dances and events at Maple Grove (MN) High School is non-curricular, just like SAGE, a group designed to promote tolerance and respect for gays and lesbians. However the other group was given greater access to school communication channels by being improperly classified as a curricular group. The court affirmed the granting of a permanent injunction giving SAGE the same access to school facilities. Jurist reports on the case and its background, as does Friday’s Minneapolis Star-Tribune.

More On Sarah Palin, Her Religion and Her Views On Church-State Issues

Yesterday I reported on information that was initially available about Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin's religious beliefs and views on church-state issues. In the last 36-hours, many additional pieces of information have been found by bloggers and reporters.

Palin's Religious Affiliation: Melissa Rogers, in her always excellent blog, reports on a number of additional items. In a 2008 Time Magazine interview, Palin said she was baptized as a Catholic, but her family attended non-denominational Christian churches. She identifies herself merely as a "Bible believing Christian". The AP yesterday, reporting that Palin has drawn strong support from Evangelical leaders, said that Palin's home church is an independent congregation, The Church on the Rock in Wasilla (just outside Anchorage). The Big Daddy Weave blog reports that this church was founded in 2000 with just 7 families, but has quickly grown. Palin sometimes also worships at the Juneau Christian Center, which is affiliated with the Pentecostal Assemblies of God. [UPDATE: Apparently Palin's current home church is Wasilla Bible Church, an independent evangelical congregation. AP says she joined this 6 years ago. Before that her home church was Church on the Rock.]

Palin’s Support for Faith Based Initiative: The Roundtable for Religion and Social Welfare Policy reports that Palin was a supporter of Alaska’s Office of Faith Based and Community Initiatives (OFBCI) set up by her predecessor in office. A 2007 Anchorage Daily News article reported that Palin's state budget proposed ending $1.5 million in state block grants to three cities and instead placing most of that amount in the budget of the OFBCI for it to distribute more broadly around the state.

Clarification of Palin’s Views on Teaching Creationism: Yesterday’s posting quoted an excerpt from a 2006 PBS interview in which Palin said she favored teaching both evolution and creationism in public schools. Since then, others have pointed out the Palin quickly qualified her statement through an interview with the Anchorage Daily News which reported:

Palin said she meant only to say that discussion of alternative views should be allowed to arise in Alaska classrooms: "I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum." She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum.

Who Supported Palin for VP: Christianity Today says that Palin was the top pick for VP by Richard Land, policy head of the Southern Baptist Convention. In an Aug. 8 interview with CBS News, Land said that Palin would be the candidate who would most excite Southern Baptists. He explained: "she's a person of strong faith. She just had her fifth child, a Downs Syndrome child. And there's a wonderful quote that she gave about her baby, and the fact that she would never, ever consider having an abortion just because her child had Downs Syndrome. She's strongly pro-life."

Texas AG Clarifies Authorization for New Bible Courses In Schools

The Texas Attorney General this week issued a long-awaited Opinion (Opinion No. GA-0657, Aug. 28, 2008) on the state's new legislation authorizing courses on the Old and New Testaments' impact on history and literature. (See prior posting.) The question was whether or not schools are required to offer such courses every year. Focusing on two separate sections of the new law, the Opinion concludes that (1) schools are permitted but not required to offer such courses; (2) if such a course is offered but attracts fewer than 15 students, the course can be cancelled for that semester; but (3) while a full-fledged separate course is not required, schools are required to offer at least a unit of instruction on the impact of the Bible on history and literature somewhere in its required enrichment curriculum. Thursday’s Houston Chronicle reported on the AG’s opinion. [Thanks to Blog from the Capital for the lead.]

Court Says No Tax Exemption For Catholic Hospital That Gives Little Charity Care

In Provena Covenant Medical Center v. Department of Revenue of the State of Illinois, (IL Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2008), an Illinois appellate court agreed with the Illinois Department of Revenue that a Catholic Hospital in Urbana (IL) was not entitled to a property tax exemption. Covenant devoted less than 1% of its revenue to charity care. Applying six factors, the court upheld the Revenue Department's ruling that the property was not used exclusively for charitable purposes and did not belong to an institution of public charity. Alternatively the hospital claimed it was entitled to an exemption as property used primarily for religious purposes. The court also rejected this argument:

If "religious purpose" meant whatever one did in the name of religion, it would be an unlimited and amorphous concept…. "Religious purpose" within the meaning of [the statute] has to be narrower than "Christian service," or else "religious purpose" would mean everything (and, therefore, nothing)…. If the operation of the property is businesslike and more characteristic of a place of commerce than a facility used primarily for religious purposes, the property is not exempt from taxation… Covenant more resembles a business with religious overtones than property used primarily for religious purposes.

Thursday's Chicago Tribune reported on the decision. Today's Urbana News-Gazette reports that the county treasurer moved quickly after the decision to demand that the hospital return $6.1 million in property taxes and interest that the county had refunded when a trial court initially overturned the Department of Revenue's exemption denial.

A First Look At Sarah Palin's Religious and Church-State Views

Now that John McCain has picked a little known governor, Sarah Palin, as his vice-presidential choice, what do we know about her views on religion and church-state issues? The Anchorage Daily News gave this some coverage during her 2006 run for governor. Here is an excerpt from an Oct. 23, 2006 article:

Palin's parents say they are not political and don't know how she decided to turn her ambition and work ethic toward politics. Her Christian faith, they say, came from her mother, who took her children to area Bible churches as they were growing up (Sarah is the third of four siblings). They say her faith has been steady since high school, when she led the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, and grew stronger as she sought out believers in her college years.

Palin doesn't brandish her religion on the campaign trail, but that doesn't prevent others from doing so. After she was first elected mayor, her predecessor, John Stein, objected that a Valley cable TV program had hailed her as Wasilla's first "Christian mayor." In a column for the local newspaper, he named eight previous mayors and added that he, too, was a Christian...

And here is an excerpt from a Nov. 5, 2006 Anchorage Daily News article (via LEXIS):

A significant part of Palin's base of support lies among social and Christian conservatives. Her positions on social issues emerged slowly during the campaign: on abortion (should be banned for anything other than saving the life of the mother), stem cell research (opposed), physician-assisted suicide (opposed), creationism (should be discussed in schools), state health benefits for same-sex partners (opposed, and supports a constitutional amendment to bar them).

Palin and her staff complained that efforts to raise these issues in public were divisive and hypothetical. The normally unflappable candidate seemed put-upon when she faced a string of such questions in the last debate, on public television and radio Thursday night....

Palin said her reading of the Bible would not "bleed over into policy." But she has based much of her campaign around a close fundamentalist reading of another text - the state constitution - which she cited in nearly every debate as the source of her guiding principles.

Her respect for the state constitution was illustrated by her first veto as governor. Alaska's Supreme Court had ordered the state to provide health benefits to same-sex partners of public employees, finding that this was mandated by the state constitution's equal protection clause. Palin vetoed a subsequent attempt by the legislature to enact legislation to take away the same-sex benefits. After being advised by the state attorney general that the legislation was unconstitutional, she said that signing the bill would be in direct violation of her oath of office. (Anchorage Daily News, Dec. 29, 2006 article.)

UPDATE: Here is an Anchorage Daily News article from Oct. 25, 2006 quoting some of Palin's answers to church-state questions in a PBS debate during the gubernatorial race. On the teaching of creationism or intelligent design in public schools, she said:

Teach both. You know, don’t be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important and it’s so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both. And, you know, I say this, too, as the daughter of a science teacher. Growing up with being so privileged and blessed to be given a lot of information on, on both sides of the subject -- creationism and evolution. It’s been a healthy foundation for me. But don’t be afraid of information and let kids debate both sides.

[Thanks to the Dallas Morning News for the lead on the Update.]

UPDATE: See my Aug. 30 posting for more on this topic.

Court Rules On Motions In Church Concert Zoning Case

Church of Universal Love and Music v. Fayette County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65564 (WD PA, Aug. 26, 2008), involves a zoning dispute in which William Pritts and the church he founded are attempting to obtain rezoning or a special exception so his congregation can continue to use property in an agricultural area for religious concerts. Plaintiffs allege that a central tenet of the Church of Universal Love and Music is the belief that "religious inspiration and community are advanced by celebration of live music."

In the case, a Pennsylvania federal district court refused to grant plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment under RLUIPA, finding that there is a substantial dispute about the sincerity of Pritts' religious beliefs. It also denied both sides motions for summary judgment on the claim that the zoning denial imposed a substantial burden on plaintiffs' religious exercise, and defendants' motion to dismiss a claim under the "unreasonable limitations" provision of RLUIPA. The court also rejected defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's 1st Amendment free exercise and free association claims. Finally the court rejected plaintiffs' claim under the "equal terms" provision of RLUIPA and their takings clause claim, and dismissed certain individual defendants from the case.

10th Circuit Rejects Claim That Confidentiality Rule Violates Free Exercise

In Kosan v. Utah Department of Corrections, (10th Cir., Aug. 21, 208), the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a free exercise claim brought by Vivian Kosan, a counselor formerly employed by the Utah prison system. That portion of the lawsuit stemmed from a letter of warning issued to Kosan by one of her superiors because Kosan had reported unsubstantiated charges of sexual harassment by her supervisor Brandon Burr a religious authority, Burr's LDS Stake President. Kosan was instructed not to repeat that type of conduct which was defamatory and revealed confidential information. Kosan claimed that this order interfered with her right to consult with her clergy. The court concluded, however, that since the warning letter applied a policy against discussing Departmental business with outsiders that is applicable to non-religious as well as religious conduct, it is a permissible neutral rule of general applicability. (See prior related posting.)

California Prisons and Chaplains Deal With Same-Sex Marriage Ruling

AP reported yesterday that California prison officials are trying to determine the impact on prisons and prison chaplains of the California Supreme Court's ruling earlier this year legalizing same-sex marriage. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in the midst of drafting new regulations on the subject, has decided that the same rules will apply that govern opposite-sex marriage. Inmates will be able to marry, but, for safety and security concerns, marriages between fellow inmates will not be allowed. Last year, California became the first state to allow conjugal visits and overnight stays for inmates with outside same-sex partners. Department lawyers also recommend that prison chaplains stop performing weddings for all inmates and leave that task to outsiders so chaplains who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds are not in the position of performing ceremonies only for some.

President Proclaims "National Days of Prayer and Remembrance"

Yesterday, President George W. Bush issued a Proclamation (full text) declaring Sept. 5 through 7 as National Days of Prayer and Remembrance in tribute to those who died in the 9-11 attacks. He also asked for prayer the safety and success of members of our Armed Forces. He concluded: "I ask that the people of the United States and their places of worship mark these National Days of Prayer and Remembrance with memorial services, the ringing of bells, and evening candlelight remembrance vigils. I also invite all people across the world to share in these Days of Prayer and Remembrance."

Religious Events On Thursday At Democratic National Convention

Here is a roundup of the religious events on Thursday's final session of the Democratic National Convention. (Full schedule of religious events.) The convention's second Faith Caucus was held in early afternoon. Scheduled panels, both moderated by Joshua Dubois, the campaign's director of religious affairs, were:(1) "Moral Values Issues Abroad". Panelists were Dr. Preeta Bansal, Dr. David Gushee, Sr. Simone Campbell, Dr. Claude d’Estree. (2) "Getting Out the Faith Vote". Panelists were Rev. Romal Tune, Mark Linton, Rev. C Welton Gaddy, Rev. Dr. Barbara Williams-Skinner, Rabbi Steve Gutow. The Lawrence (KA) Journal-World briefly reports on the Caucus, including remarks by Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean.

The invocation (full text) opening the convention's final session was offered by Rabbi David Saperstein of the Union for Reform Judaism Religious Action Center. (Press release.) He prayed that the United States "may ever be an or l'goyim, a light unto the nations." He also made special reference to Edward Kennedy.

The closing benediction was offered by Pastor Joel Hunter, leader of Northland Community Church, a mega-church in Orlando, FL. CF News13 interviewed Hunter about his planned benediction.

Italian Museum Rejects Call For Removal of Crucifixion Sculpture

Despite protests from the Pope and from a regional government official, an Italian museum has refused to remove a modern art sculpture of a green frog, crucified while holding a beer mug in one hand and an egg in the other. Reuters reported yesterday that the board of Bolzano's Museion by majority vote decided that the sculpture called Zuerst die Fuesse (Feet First) would stay during the remainder of the exhibit of which it is a part-- a retrospective of the art of German artist Martin Kippenberger. Franz Pahl, president of the regional government, called the sculpture "blasphemy and a disgusting piece of trash." Pahl released excerpts from a letter from the Vatican saying that the sculpture wounds the religious sentiments of many people. While Claudio Strinati, a superintendent of Rome's state museums, supported the museum board, Italy's culture minister, Sandro Bondi, said museums that receive state funds should not "exalt artworks of desecration, of useless provocation and of nonsense".

Anti-Christian Violence Continues In Eastern India

Reuters reported yesterday that anti-Christian violence by Hindu mobs in India's eastern state of Orissa continues as Pope Benedict XVI condemned the violence and Italy's foreign ministry said it would summon India's ambassador to demand "incisive action" to end the violence. As further detailed in a Christian World News report on Wednesday, the violence against Christians began after the murder of Hindu leader Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati and four of his disciples last Saturday. More than a dozen churches have been attacked and eleven people have been killed. The Orissa High Court ordered the state government to deploy army personnel to stop the violence, but 3000 police deployed on Thursday have so far been unable to do so.

In Zoning Case, MI Appellate Court Holds Firm On Equal Protection Determination

On Tuesday, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued its third opinion in the long-running zoning dispute in Shepherd Montessori Center Milan v. Ann Arbor Charter Township, (MI Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2008). In the case, a Catholic school challenged a township's denial of its request for a zoning variance. In 2007 (see prior posting), The Court of Appeals held that the denial violated both RLUIPA and the equal protection clause. When the township petitioned the Michigan Supreme Court to review the case, the state's high court instead vacated the Court of Appeals decision and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of another RLUIPA case the state Supreme Court had just decided-- Greater Bible Way Temple of Jackson v City of Jackson. Now, reconsidering in light of Greater Bible Way, the Court of Appeals reluctantly concluded that RLUIPA was not violated, but reaffirmed its earlier holding that the rezoning denial did violate the Equal Protection Clause. [Thanks to Brian D. Wassom for the lead.]

Fiji Human Rights Commission Says Methodist Conversion Plans Are Unconstitutional

In the South Pacific island nation of Fiji, the Human Rights Commission (press release) has warned that plans by the country's Methodist Church Conference to focus evangelizing efforts on the country's Indian population would violate Fiji's constitution as well as principles of international law. According to today's Fiji Times, Commission chairperson Dr. Shaista Shameem said that targeting of a minority group for particular attention for conversionary efforts would violate the fundamental principle of freedom of religion found in the 1997 Constitution of Fiji.

South African Court Says Church Acted Illegally In Firing Gay Teacher

In South Africa, a Pretoria High Court judge has ruled that a church acted illegally when it fired a music teacher at the church's Art Academy after it found that he was in a homosexual relationship. SABC News today reports that the Court ordered the Nederduitse Gereformeerde Kerk to apologize to Johan Strydom and to pay him damages of 86,000 Rand ($11,000 US). Reporting on arguments in the case last week, the Sunday Independent said that Strydom claims his firing violates South Africa's Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act and his constitutional right to equality and dignity (Constitution Secs. 9 and 10). In its presentation to the court, the church said that gays are welcome in the congregation if they repent and "either change their ways or live a celibate life."

Men Keeping Animals For Santeria Sacrifice Charged With Animal Cruelty

In Greenburgh, New York, a father and son have been charged with animal cruelty under New York's Agriculture and Markets Law after police discovered over 100 animals intended for sacrifice in Santeria religious rituals on their property. Yesterday's Lower Hudson Journal-News reports that the animals included goats, rams, chickens, pigeons, doves, ducks, quail and turtles. The charges do not stem from the planned sacrifices, but rather from the fact that a goat and a pigeon died from apparent malnutrition. The father was also charged with violating a town ordinance against keeping farm animals in residential neighborhoods. Charges of transporting the animals from a farm in New Jersey without proper documents could also be filed.

Suit Challenges Promotion of Religion In Florida County Schools

In Pensacola, Florida, the ACLU (press release) has filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of two Santa Rosa County Pace High School students alleging that school officials have used their positions "to persistently and pervasively promote their personal religious beliefs in the public schools and at school events." The complaint (full text) in Doe v. School Board for Santa Rosa County, Florida, (ND FL, filed 8/27/2008) alleges that school officials have sponsored prayer at school events, including graduation; arranged religious baccalaureate services; held school-sponsored activities at churches; and have proselytized students or permitted outsiders to do so during classes and school events. Seeking an injunction and nominal damages, plaintiffs allege that these practices violate the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution and the "No Aid" clause of Florida's Constitution.

Wednesday's Religious Activity At Democratic Convention

Religion Clause each day has been reporting on religious events that have been part of the Democratic National Convention. At the Convention on Wednesday (full schedule), the invocation was given by Archbishop Demetrios, Primate of the Greek Orthodox Church in America. His invocation (full text) was less sectarian than those offered on prior days. The closing benediction was given by Sister Catherine Pinkerton, Congregation of St. Joseph’s in Cleveland, Ohio.

Presidential Proclamation Includes Praise For Faith-Based Addiction Treatment

Yesterday , President Bush issued a Proclamation (full text) declaring September 2008 as National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month. A portion of the Proclamation emphasized the role of faith-based organizations in addiction treatment:

Too many of our citizens have been swept up in a cycle of addiction. Through faith-based and community groups, we have revolutionized the way we help people break the chains of addiction. The Access to Recovery program provides addicts with vouchers so that they can attend the treatment center of their choice. Our Nation's armies of compassion have helped nearly 200,000 clients rediscover their dignity and purpose through this program.

Christian Anti-Muslim Group Issues Voter Leadership Guide

A press release yesterday by a group called Truth for Muslims announced that the organization has begun to distribute its 2008 Voter Leadership Guide. John Marion, Project Director said:

The Guide informs citizens of what our leaders are saying about Islam. Islam is one of the greatest challenges we are facing as Christians in America. It’s an ideology that is incompatible both with the United States Constitution and with the Gospel of Jesus Christ. And our leaders—both in Washington and in the pulpits—are virtually silent.

The introduction to the Guide explains its purpose and format:

Unlike voter guides you may have seen in the past, this one does not focus on a specific race, nor does it promote one candidate over another. Its purpose is to educate YOU about one of the most crucial issues facing America: the rising influence of Islam.

It’s called a "voter leadership guide" because it will help you to discern which leaders, now or in the future, are speaking wisely about how Americans should respond to Islam. Several of the examples we’ve chosen are high-profile political leaders, but the "Ten Questions" you’ll find on the back of the guide can be used to analyze any leader—whether on a county council, school committee, talk show...even a church missions board.

Recent Prisoner and Institutionalized Persons Free Exercise Cases

In Lewis v. Ryan, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64335 (SD CA, May 1, 2008), a California federal district judge accepted the recommendations of a federal magistrate judge set out in a lengthy opinion at Lewis v. Mitchell, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64333 (SD CA, March 6, 2008). The court permitted a Muslim inmate to move ahead with various claims for injunctive relief alleging violations of the 1st and 8th Amendments and RLUIPA. Plaintiff alleged that he was served food containing pork without the pork content being noted on the prison menu, and that he was subsequently denied medical treatment. Plaintiff also claimed the right to a Halal diet. (See prior related posting.)

DeSimone v. Bartow, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64419 (ED WI, Aug. 12, 2008) is a lawsuit by plaintiff who has been civilly committed to a mental health facility operated in part by the Department of Corrections. A Wisconsin federal district court permitted him to proceed with a claim that his 1st amendment and RLUIPA free exercise rights were violated when he was prohibited from writing in his Atlantean language, a practice plaintiff said was central to his religious belief. Officials said it took too long to translate the writings, and untranslated writings posed security risks, even though they did not impose the same restrictions on others who wrote in different foreign languages.

In Wofford v. Williams, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63946 (D OR, Aug. 20, 2008), and Oregon federal district court granted a preliminary injunction ordering prison officials to provide a Seventh Day Adventist inmate with a kosher diet. The court found that plaintiff would probably succeed on the merits of his 1st Amendment, RLUIPA and equal protection claims. Prison officials had asserted that kosher meals were available only to Jewish inmates and that plaintiff's faith does not require him to limit himself to a kosher diet.

In Linehan v. Crosby, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63738 (D FL, Aug. 20, 2008), a Florida federal district judge accepted the recommendations of a federal magistrate and denied the claims of a Seventh Day Adventist prisoner to a kosher diet. The court held: "Since the Jewish Dietary Accommodation Program was discontinued several years ago, the only person Plaintiff can show is being treated differently is one Jewish inmate who receives kosher food pursuant to a settlement agreement.... Both the excessive cost, as well as administrative and logistic difficulties, of implementing a kosher meal plan in the Florida prison system are compelling state interests, and the current vegan and vegetarian diets are the least restrictive means of addressing this compelling interest ."

In Woods v. Chiarelli, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64455 (MD PA, Aug. 21, 2008), a Pennsylvania federal district court held that a prison policy preventing a Muslim inmate from attending communal religious services did not violate his 1st Amendment rights. Plaintiff, held as a federal prisoner in a state prison, was subject to a separation order from the United States Marshal's Service requiring him to be separated from three other federal inmates being held at the same facility.

Court Rejects Challenge To Massachusetts Abortion Facility Buffer Zone Law

In McCullen v. Coakley, (D MA, Aug. 22, 2008), a Massachusetts federal district court rejected a facial constitutional challenge brought by pro-life "sidewalk counselors" to Massachusetts' recently revised law that creates a 35-foot fixed buffer zone around driveways and entrances of reproductive health care facilities. In a 75-page opinion, the court rejected First Amendment, Equal Protection and Due Process challenges. The court found that the law is a content-neutral, narrowly-tailored time, place and manner regulation. In response to plaintiffs' Free Exercise challenge,the court held:

The Act does not regulate speech, expression, prayer, singing, worship or display of religious articles. It merely regulates where such expression may take place, i.e., outside of a clearly marked buffer zone during the normal business hours of an RHCF. The Act also applies to all non-exempt persons equally. As a result, this court is “bound to conclude that the regulation does not discriminate against a particular religion or religious practice.”

Catholic Hierarchy Takes Issue With Peolosi, Biden On Their Pro-Life Views

Fox News reported yesterday that the Catholic Archbishop of Washington, DC, Donald Wuerl has publicly taken issue with remarks about the Church's view on abortion made by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. On Meet the Press last Sunday, pro-choice Pelosi said the Church's current view that life begins at conception has been Church doctrine for only 50 years or so. In a news release on Monday, Archbishop Wuerl said: "We respect the right of elected officials such as Speaker Pelosi to address matters of public policy that are before them, but the interpretation of Catholic faith has rightfully been entrusted to the Catholic bishops.... The Catechism of the Catholic Church is clear: the current teaching of the Catholic Church on human life and abortion is the same teaching as it was 2,000 years ago."

Meanwhile in the same article Fox News reports that pro-choice Joseph Biden in 2006 made the point that the Church's current view that life begins at conception was adopted unequivocally only in the 19th century during the reign of Pope Pius IX. (Interestingly, in Roe v. Wade (at fn. 61), Justice Blackmun similarly argued that the Catholic Church's current view became its official position only in the 19th century.) Reacting to Biden's views, Denver's Archbishop Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput recently told the AP: "I presume that his integrity will lead him to refrain from presenting himself for communion, if he supports a false 'right' to abortion."

Mega-Church Leader Says IRS Investigation Is Politically Motivated

Rev. Mac Hammond, founder of the mega-church Living Word Christian Center in Minneapolis (MN), has accused the IRS of political motivations in their investigation of him. Tuesday's Minneapolis Star-Tribune reports that Hammond, in a letter to congregants, says that the IRS summons demanding financial information from him is part of "a very clear effort, on a national scale, to discredit, defame and intimidate ministries and preachers of what has been called the 'prosperity gospel.'" The IRS has filed a petition in federal district court to enforce its summons. Melissa Rogers last week posted more background information on the Hammond investigation.

Tuesday's Religious Events At The Democratic National Convention

Here are the religious events (full schedule) that took place on Tuesday in Denver at the Democratic National Convention. At noon, the first Faith Caucus, moderated by Rev. Jim Wallis, was held. The theme of the first panel was "Common Ground on Common Good." The official schedule listed panel members as Dr. Douglas W. Kmiec, Rabbi Jack Moline, Rev. Jennifer Kottler, Bishop Wilfredo DeJesus and Rev. John Hunter. However reports of those attending say panelists also included former U.S. Rep. Tim Roemer and Rev. Dr. Susan Thistlewaite. Christianity Today reported on the caucus. The caucus was interrupted by an anti-abortion protester who was ushered out. (Christianity Today). The second panel's topic was "How an Obama Administration will Engage People of Faith." Panel members were: Rabbi David Saperstein, Prof. John Dilulio and Rev. Otis Moss, Jr. UPDATE: The Aug. 28 Wall Street Journal has further coverage of the panel discussions.

The opening invocation (full text) was given by Dr. Cynthia Hale, Disciples of Christ, Decatur, GA. The closing benediction (full text) was given by Revs. Jin Ho Kang and Young Sook Kang, Methodist, Aurora, CO.

Meanwhile, a press release by Operation Rescue founder Randall Terry advertised that tomorrow in downtown Denver, "Catholic and Evangelical Christians will peacefully 'break the law' to protest the slaughter of the innocent by abortion, and to call on fellow Christians to reject the Obama/Biden 'Ticket of Death.'"

British Prosecutor Says Religious Flagellation Was Child Cruelty

In Manchester, England, Syed Mustafa Zaidi is on trial for child cruelty after he encouraged two young boys to flog themselves with a 'zanjeer' (bladed whip) at a Matam ceremony held in Manchester last January. The ceremony, observed by some Shi'a Muslims, involves self-flagellation as part of a mourning period in the Muslim calendar. Yesterday's Manchester Evening News reports that in closing arguments at trial, the prosecutor said that children under 16 cannot legally consent to take part in the ceremony. The prosecutor also argued against any religious freedom defense because the ceremony is voluntary and not a fundamental doctrine of the Shi'a faith.

UPDATE: Monday's London Mail reports that the jury returned a verdict of guilty in the case after two and one-half hours of deliberation. Zaidi faces up to ten years in prison.

Presidential Nominating Conventions and the Establishment Clause-- An Analysis

As the Democratic Party at its National Convention this week reaches out to religious voters, the question arises as to whether the Establishment Clause places any limits on religious activity at Presidential nominating conventions. (See Don Byrd's recent posting at Blog from the Capital.) The courts have not faced this precise issue, but a series of Supreme Court cases have focused on related concerns. At the heart of the issue is whether political parties are, at their conventions, engaged in governmental action covered by the Constitution, or whether instead they are acting as private associations which protected by the Constitution.

Early on in Smith v. Allwright (1944) and Terry v. Adams (1953), the Supreme Court struck down party primaries or pre-primaries that precluded Blacks from voting, finding that they violated the 15th Amendment's ban on states infringing the right to vote on the basis of race. However, more recently when states began to impose various sorts of limitations on party primaries, the Supreme Court has held that the associational rights of political parties are protected by the First Amendment. The court's discussion in the 2000 case of California Democratic Party v. Jones is particularly instructive. The Court struck down California's requirement that every primary voter receive a ballot listing candidates from all political parties. Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, said:

[W]e have not held ... that the processes by which political parties select their nominees are, as respondents would have it, wholly public affairs that States may regulate freely. To the contrary, we have continually stressed that when States regulate parties' internal processes they must act within limits imposed by the Constitution.... [R]espondents' reliance on Smith v. Allwright ... and Terry v. Adams ... is misplaced.... These cases held only that, when a State prescribes an election process that gives a special role to political parties, it "endorses, adopts and enforces the discrimination against Negroes" that the parties ... bring into the process--so that the parties' discriminatory action becomes state action under the Fifteenth Amendment....They do not stand for the proposition that party affairs are public affairs, free of First Amendment protections....

Justice Stevens dissent (joined by Justice Ginsburg) distinguished state primaries from the action of political parties. However as to political parties, Stevens wrote:

A political party could, if a majority of its members chose to do so, adopt a platform advocating white supremacy and opposing the election of any non-Caucasians. Indeed, it could decide to use its funds and oratorical skills to support only those candidates who were loyal to its racist views. Moreover, if a State permitted its political parties to select their candidates through conventions or caucuses, a racist party would also be free to select only candidates who would adhere to the party line.

Does this make it clear that the Establishment Clause is inapplicable to national party conventions? Can parties impose religious tests on who may be a delegate? Would imposing a religious test on who may be the party nominee violate Article VI of the U.S. Constitution that prohibits any religious test for any office under the United States?

USCIRF Issues New Report On Vietnam Religious Freedom Concerns

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom yesterday released a 32-page report on religious freedom in Vietnam (full text). The report, which includes findings from USCIRF's 2007 trip to Vietnam, concludes that "religious freedom conditions in Vietnam continue to be mixed, with improvements for some religious communities but not for others; progress in some provinces but not in others; reforms of laws at the national level that are not fully implemented or are ignored at the local level; and still too many abuses of and restrictions on religious freedom affecting most of Vietnam's diverse religious communities." The Commission calls on the State Department to re-designate Vietnam a "country of particular concern" under the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act. From 2004 to November 2006, Vietnam had carried the CPC designation; however it was removed in 2006 just before President Bush visited the country for an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit. (See prior posting.)

6th Circuit Upholds Ohio Funeral Picketing Ban In Challenge By Church

In Phelps-Roper v. Strickland, (6th Cir., Aug. 22, 2008), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of Ohio's Funeral Protest Provision (ORC Sec. 3767.30) which prohibits picketing or other disruptive protest activities within 300 feet of a funeral service during the service and for a one-hour window on either side of it. The lawsuit challenging the provision was brought by a leader of the Topeka, Kansas Westboro Baptist Church whose members have traveled around the country picketing funerals of veterans killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and other events. Their protest signs generally urge that American soldiers have been killed as God's punishment of the country for tolerating homosexuality. The court held:

Because we find that the Funeral Protest Provision is content-neutral, serves an important governmental interest, is narrowly tailored, and affords ample alternative channels of communication, we hold that it is a reasonable time, place, and manner restriction that does not violate the First Amendment.

CBS News reported on the decision last Friday. [Thanks to Volokh Conspiracy for the lead.]

Dems' Convention Begins and Ends With Christian Prayer Urging Social Justice

Former Colorado state senator Polly Baca gave the invocation opening the Democratic National Convention Monday afternoon in Denver. Her invocation (full text) asked for God's guidance and focused on commitment to "the poor, the sick, the disabled, the stranger, the immigrants." The invocation was explicitly Christian, ending with "We pray in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit."

Monday's closing benediction (full text) was given by Don Miller, a Portland, Oregon author and speaker on Christian spirituality. He replaced Cameron Strang who decided not to give the benediction out of concern that it could be seen as a political endorsement. (See prior posting.) Christianity Today published an interview with Miller about his planned benediction and his political views. Miller's benediction focused on social justice issues and economic opportunity, as well as on "our moral standing in the world". It ended with: "I make these requests in the name of your son, Jesus, who gave his own life against the forces of injustice. Let Him be our example."

A DNC release lists all faith leaders who will open and close convention sessions with prayer. The only non-Christian delivering an invocation is Rabbi David Saperstein of the Union for Reform Judaism. He will open Thursday's session, the evening on which Obama will accept the nomination. Faith caucuses are scheduled of early afternoon on Tuesday and Thursday. Participants in them are also listed in the DNC release.

Church-State Quiz Designed For Christian Leaders

Christianity Today's Leadership Journal has posted a "Church & Politics Quiz". It is designed to help Christian leaders plot on a graph where they stand on church-state issues:

Combining the two axis scores will place a person in one of the four political quadrants. Radical Reformers see a strong prophetic role for the church and combine this with a robust call for political engagement to seek social and political change. In contrast, Quiet Critics steer away from a direct role for the church in politics, instead emphasizing the church's purity by maintaining a separation from the state. From this perspective, the church best shares the gospel by being an alternative community that models Christian love.

Those who emphasize the link between God and nation are generally more supportive of the system and want to foster connections between church and state. As a result, Thumpin' Theocrats sound the call for renewing a Christian America by recapturing its godly heritage. Private Patriots also connect religious practice with support of the nation, but their application of faith to politics is as an outgrowth of personal piety rather than church involvement.

United Arab Emirates Law Reduces Work Hours During Ramadan

Ramadan this year begins approximately Sept. 1. Today's Kaleej Times reports that in the United Arab Emirates, under Article 65 of the Federal Labour Law, working hours are reduced to 6 hours per day (instead of the normal 8 hours) during Ramadan. The reduction applies to all workers regardless of their religion and regardless of whether or not they are fasting. However the law does allow up to 2 hours overtime per day if the employee is paid 25% more for each overtime hour in the daytime, and 50% more for each overtime hour at night.

Irish Cardinal Says EU Referendum Defeat Was Reaction To Anti-Religious Culture

Ireland's Catholic Church leader, Cardinal Sean Brady, said in a speech last Sunday that one reason Irish voters in June refused to approve the EU Lisbon Treaty is Europe's culture that tends to keep religion out of the public domain. According to yesterday's EU Observer, Brady speaking about the results of the only referendum held in Europe on the treaty criticized "a fairly widespread culture in European affairs which relegates manifestations of one's own religious convictions to the private and subjective sphere." He argued that a number of European decisions undermining Christian beliefs and institutions "have made it more difficult for committed Christians to maintain their instinctive commitment to the European project."

FLDS Members Challenge Trustee's Power Over UEP Trust Property

The Salt Lake Tribune reported yesterday that three FLDS Church members are challenging the right of a court-appointed fiduciary to sell land belonging to the FLDS United Effort Plan Trust without court approval. Bruce R. Wisan, court appointed fiduciary who is to reform the UEP Trust, says that he has a buyer who will pay $3 million for a large tract of farm land known as Berry Knoll. However FLDS members Willie Jessop, Dan Johnson and Merlin Jessop say they have "stewardship from priesthood leadership" to use the land for grazing and farming. The motion they filed with the court says that selling the land would "pose an immediate and fundamental threat to the religion's communal lifestyle and beliefs of the community because they threaten its self-sufficiency..." Wisan says the motion shows that some FLDS members refuse to recognize that the UEP Trust has been reformed to eliminate its religious purpose. (See prior related posting.)

Dems' Convention Opens With Interfaith Event and Some Controversy

Both the AP and CQ report on the first official event of the Democratic national Convention-- an interfaith service held yesterday in a theater inside the Convention Center. The event included talks and readings from Christians, Muslims, Jews and a Buddhist. According to the Dallas News, police ejected an anti-abortion protester who began to shout "Obama's a baby killer!" as the opening number by a gospel choir began. The Rocky Mountain News says three anti-abortion protesters were ejected, including Operation Rescue founder Randall Terry who, with another protester, held up a picture of an aborted fetus as they were led out of the gathering. However as part of the official program, Bishop Charles E. Blake of the Church of God in Christ in Los Angeles, spoke about his opposition to abortion, and Sister Helen Prejean, author of "Dead Man Walking," spoke against the death penalty.

A protester with a bullhorn and a sign that read "Allah is not God" was not admitted to the gathering. Meanwhile, Fox News reports that controversy also arose over the Democrat's invitation to Dr. Ingrid Mattson, president of The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) to speak as part of the gathering. ISNA has been heavily involved in interfaith relations and has met with key Bush administration officials. Some critics however claim that the organization has ties to radical groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood.

In one additional development, AP and the Washington Post report that young evangelist Cameron Strang, editor of Relevant Magazine and a registered Republican, backed out of delivering the invocation at Monday night's convention session when he found out it would be on the main stage and broadcast nationally. He changed his mind because he feared his appearance would be interpreted as an endorsement of Obama. He will instead take part in a lower profile religious caucus later in the week.

UPDATE: Here, from the Denver Post, is a video of excerpts from the interfaith serice.

HHS Issues Proposed Rules To Protect Conscience Rights of Health Care Workers

Last Thursday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services formally released for comment proposed regulations (full text) designed to enforce federal provisions that protect conscience rights of doctors and other health care providers participating in programs receiving HHS funding. The regulations apply to those who have moral or religious objections to providing certain medical procedures, including sterilization and abortion. An HHS press release says the new regulations would clarify that the protections apply to institutional health care providers as well as to individual employees working for federally funded recipients, and would require recipients of certain HHS funds to certify their compliance with laws protecting health care workers' rights of conscience.

Reporters at a White House press briefing on Friday (full text) raised the question of whether the proposed regulations were broad enough to cover pharmacists. The proposed rules appear to omit a controversial definition of "abortion" that appeared in an earlier draft that was circulated to members of Congress. That earlier draft included a specific definition that encompassed prescribing, dispensing or administering drugs preventing implantation of a fertilized egg as abortion. The new proposal has no definition of abortion in it. (See prior posting.)

Recent Articles and Recent Book of Interest

From SSRN:

• Raghav Sharma, Rajarshi Sen & Adarsh Ramanujan, Affirmative Action for Muslims in the Indian Jurisprudential, Social, Economical and Political Context: A Constitutional Conundrum?, (June 17, 2008).


• Brigham Daniels, Revitalizing Zion: Nineteenth-Century Mormonism and Today's Urban Sprawl, (Journal of Land, Resources & Environmental Law, Forthcoming.)

From Bepress:

• Emily Prescott Esq., Allyson Hauck Esq. & Dana Barton Esq., When Firmly Held Religious Beliefs Conflict With the Right to Wedded Bliss, California Public Employee Relations (CPER) Papers, Working Paper 25 (August 2008).

From SmartCILP:

• Thomas C. Kohler, The Kenneth M. Piper Lecture. Religion In the Workplace: Faith, Action, and the Religious Foundations of American Employment Law, 83 Chicago-Kent Law Review 975-991 (2008).


• Martha Minow, The Government Can't, May, or Must Fund Religious Schools: Three Riddles of Constitutional Change for Laurence Tribe, 42 Tulsa Law Review 911-937 (2007).

New Book:

• David Ownby, Falun Gong and the Future of China, (Oxford Univ. Press, March 2008), reviewed by the New York Times.

Campus Poster With Suggestive Picture of Jesus Tests Harassment Rules

At Lorain County Community College in Elyria, Ohio, members of the campus Activists for Atheism club find that they are testing the scope of the school's anti-harassment rule that includes a prohibition on illustrations that mock or ridicule race or religion. Friday's Elyira Chronicle-Telegram reports that as part of Club Awareness Week, along with many other displays advertising student-run extracurricular organizations, the atheist group put up a poster showing a topless man kissing Jesus on the neck, and displaying the caption "Jesus Christ had a homosexual relationship?" Campus security guards refused to remove the poster as requested by complaining students, but after a few hours a student took it down. Christopher Burns, secretary- treasurer of the atheist group said it was not intended to mock Christianity, but to stir debate about a passage from the Secret Gospel of Mark. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Church of England Issues Guides To Prevent Bogus Marriages By Immigrants

Under British law, a foreigner who marries a resident of the European Union is generally allowed to stay in Britain. Today's London Telegraph reports that bishops of the Church of England have issued confidential guidelines to try to cut down on the number of bogus marriages performed by Anglican priests at the behest of immigrants who are merely trying to obtain British residency. Traditionally, in order to prevent marriages of convenience, British law has required all foreign nationals from outside the European Union to obtain a Home Office certificate of approval to marry in a register office. However no government certificate is required for marriages performed by the Church of England. Church leaders believe that, despite warnings, many priests are being duped into performing marriages of convenience.

Meanwhile the issue was complicated last month when the House of Lords issued a decision in R (on the application of Baiai and others) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, (House of Lords, July 30, 2008) holding that the licensing rules that led to automatic denial of Home Office approval for immigrants whose visas were about to expire or who were not legally in the country are invalid. The Law Lords held that these overbroad rules violate Section 12 of the European Convention on Human rights that protects the right to marry. That decision was covered by the July 30 London Daily Mail. (See prior related posting.)

Times Features Science Teacher's Methods on Evolution

Today's New York Times carries a fascinating front page article on how Florida science teacher David Campbell teaches evolution to a skeptical science class. He captures their attention by using Walt Disney's changes over time to the Mickey Mouse character. Showing the class the different versions of the cartoon character over the years, he tells them: "Mickey evolved. And Mickey gets cuter because Walt Disney makes more money that way. That is 'selection'." The article traces at length Campbell's intriguing teaching skills and his attempts to get his students to understand the difference between science and faith.

Founder of Florida Citizens for Science, Campbell strongly backed changes in Florida's science standards adopted earlier this year that specifically mention evolution. (See prior posting.) Defending against charges that the new standards do not include alternative explanations for life's diversity, Campbell replied: "We also failed to include astrology, alchemy and the concept of the moon being made of green cheese. Because those aren't science, either."

Court Dismisses Minister's Suit Against Church Placement Agency

In Thibodeau v. American Baptist Churches of Connecticut, 2008 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1858 (CT Super. Ct., July 29, 2008), a Connecticut trial court, applying the "ministerial exception" doctrine, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction a suit by an ordained Baptist minister against American Baptist Churches of Connecticut (ABCC). ABCC recognizes ordinations and operates a clergy placement service. The lawsuit challenges ABCC's refusal to circulate plaintiff's resume to congregations after it became concerned about his fitness for the ministry. The court held that the First Amendment's free exercise guaranty precludes it from interfering in ecclesiastical matters. This deprives it of jurisdiction to decide whether ABCC should recognize plaintiff's ordination or to review whether plaintiff has been treated fairly by ABCC with respect to recognition of his ordination.

South Carolina High School Football Coaches Often Mix Religion With Coaching

Yesterday's Florence (SC) Morning News carried an article on the fine church-state line being walked by some South Carolina high school football coaches. Many pray with their teams before each game. This summer, many coaches and players attended a three day Fellowship of Christian Athletes football camp at University of South Carolina-Upstate in Spartanburg. Hemingway (SC) High School ends every practice with the Lord's Prayer, says the Lord's Prayer before and after every game, and holds a devotion every week. However assistant coach Bucky Davis said: "Everyone’s welcome to their own opinions. We don’t force anyone to do anything. The kids (convert to Christ) out of their own free will." Lamar (SC) High School coach J.R. Boyd said: "We went to church as a team one time and I found out that many of our kids had never seen the inside of a church. We went to FCA camp as well and many of my kids were saved in the process."

Kentucky County Tries To Delay Paying Attorneys Fees In 10 Commandments Case

Earlier this month, a Kentucky federal district judge made permanent the temporary injunctions against 10 Commandments displays in two Kentucky counties that had been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005. Now however McCreary County, Kentucky is attempting to delay the ability of the ACLU to recover attorneys fees in the case by preventing the judgment from becoming final. Yesterday's McCreary County Voice says the county will ask the district court to pass on a summary judgment motion that is technically still outstanding, and will attempt to appeal the judge's decision issuing the permanent injunctions before the ACLU can petition for attorneys' fees. Pulaski County officials will meet next week to consider whether to join in the appeal.

Palm Beach Neighborhood Dislikes Jewish Synagogue Meeting In Private Home

Yesterday's Palm Beach Post reports on a land use controversy in the Indian Wells neighborhood in Palm Beach County, Florida. An Orthodox Jewish congregation, Anshei Chesed, is holding servies each Friday evening and Saturday morning in a private home that apparently was purchased primarily for that use. Some 20 to 70 individuals walk to and from services each week end. Orthodox Jews do not drive on the Sabbath. Neighborhood spokesman Frank Cuomo, upset at the rights given by RLUIPA to religious groups, says that neighbors not want religious services to be held here, and that the Jewish group is using loopholes to be able to conduct them. The Post reports: "In the Florida suburbs, where sprawl is an indicator of opulence and debilitating heat is a year-round concern, finding a place within walking distance is tricky."

Biden's Views On Religion and Church-State Issues Are Examined

Now that Barack Obama has picked Sen. Joseph Biden as his vice-presidential running mate, bloggers are already examining Biden's views on church-state issues and his religious values. America: The National Catholic Weekly today posted a a piece titled Joe Biden's Catholicism. It reports that "Biden is more comfortable than most politicians in talking about how his Catholicism has affected his life and his views."

Melissa Rogers has posted a number of excerpts from Biden statements on ther role of religion in public life. Other have pointed to an excerpt on YouTube of a 2007 Biden interview at the Commonwealth Club of California in which Biden discusses his views on separation of church and state. In it, Biden focuses on a quote from Jon Meacham's American Gospel: God, the Founding Fathers, And the Making of a Nation: "Religion shapes the life of the nation without strangling it."

Religiously-Grounded Substance Abuse Programs Eschew Government Funding

One of the most controversial aspects of federal and state funding of faith-based social services relates to organizations that use prayer and religious teachings as an integral part of substance abuse treatment. Today's Louisville Courier-Journal reports that one such group-- Teen Challenge of Kentucky-- has voluntarily relinquished most of a $50,000 federal grant after Americans United for Separation of Church and State complained to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services about the grant. Teen Challenge said it did not want to risk a lawsuit over the grant which was to be used to hire a development director and train board members in fundraising. Teen Challenge uses "confrontational evangelism" to cure substance abuse.

Meanwhile, Thursday's Forward reports on Beit T'Shuvah, the country's only Jewish residential program for drug and alcohol abuse. The Los Angeles program explicitly does not seek government funding because its treatment methodology is filled with religious content-- a 12-step program combined with Jewish spirituality. Residents study Torah each morning at 7 am, and are required to attend weekly Friday night and Saturday morning religious services

School District Cuts Off All Community Flyers To End Bias Against Religious Messages

As previously reported, a federal lawsuit has been filed against the the Hudson (NH) School District challenging its policy on flyers that may be sent home with students. The school district has allowed flyers from nonprofit community organizations, but has excluded material with religious content. This past Monday, according to the Nashua (NH) Telegraph, the Hudson School Board unanimously adopted a policy change. From now on, only the school itself and school-associated volunteer groups will be able to send home flyers with students. No general community nonprofit groups will be permitted to do so. The new policy will cut down on the growing amount of material that has been distributed and will place religious and non-religious community groups on an equal footing-- both are precluded from sending home material.

Challenge To Pledge of Allegiance Partially Dismissed By NH Federal Court

Freedom from Religion Foundation v. Congress of the United States, (D NH, Aug. 7, 2008), is an opinion in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance containing the phrase "under God" in New Hampshire schools. The suit was brought on behalf of atheist and agnostic parents of three New Hampshire school children, and the lead attorney was Michael Newdow who, himself as a plaintiff, had unsuccessfully litigated a challenge to the Pledge in 2004. New Hampshire law permits children who do not wish to recite the Pledge to silently stand or remain seated while other recite it. Parents here however sought to have the recitation of the Pledge eliminated from the classroom.

Suing the U.S. Congress, the United States government, and three school districts, plaintiffs alleged some 16 bases on which recitation of the Pledge should be found unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. These included Establishment Clause and Free Exercise claims, as well as claims that the school district exposed children to emotional harm by requiring their presence in the classroom while the pledge is recited and a claim that the Pledge violates public policy by fostering national divisiveness. Several other parties intervened as defendants to support recitation of the Pledge.

In this decision, the court dismissed claims against the United States Congress. Relying on the "Speech or Debate" clause of the Constitution, it held that courts lack jurisdiction to direct Congress to enact or amend legislation. The court also dismissed the United States as a defendant, finding that plaintiffs lacked taxpayer standing. The United States however remains a party as an Intervenor, as do the state of new Hampshire, the Knights of Columbus and several New Hampshire school students and parents who intervened. (See prior related posting.)

3rd Circuit Rejects Free Exercise Challenge To PA Home-Schooling Regulation

In Combs v. Homer-Center School District, (3rd Cir., Aug. 21, 2008), the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals rejected challenges by six families to record-keeping requirements showing that they met the instructional hours and subject matter requirements, and to subsequent portfolio review, imposed by Pennsylvania's Act 169 (24 PS 13-1327.1) that regulates home schooling. Plaintiffs, all Christians of varying denominations who home-schooled their children, claim that the requirements place a substantial burden on their free exercise of religion in violation of the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and of Pennsylvania's Religious Freedom Protection Act. The court, focusing on the 1st Amendment challenge, held:

Act 169 is a neutral law of general applicability. It neither targets religious practice nor selectively imposes burdens on religiously motivated conduct. Instead, it imposes the same requirements on parents who home-school for secular reasons as on parents who do so for religious reasons. Furthermore, nothing in the record suggests Commonwealth school officials discriminate against religiously motivated home education programs (e.g., denying approval of home education programs because they include faith-based curriculum materials).... The Commonwealth has a legitimate interest in ensuring children taught under home education programs are achieving minimum educational standards and are demonstrating sustained progress in their educational program.

The court also rejected plaintiffs' claim that a "hybrid right" calling for stricter scrutiny was involved. Rejecting the federal constitutional claims, the court remanded the state law claim to state court.

In a concurring opinion, Chief Judge Scirica reached the merits of the state Religious Freedom Protection Act claim and found that: "Based upon the plain language of the RFPA, Parents have failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that they have been compelled or will likely be compelled to violate a specific tenet of their religious faith."

The Home School Legal Defense Association that represented the parents said it is reviewing the decision and considering an appeal. [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Virginia Episcopal Diocese Loses On Two More Issues In Property Disputes

On August 19, a Fairfax County, Virginia trial court issued two more "Letter Opinions" in In re Multi-Circuit Episcopal Church Property Litigation-- the contest over property ownership between eleven break-away congregations and the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia. In prior decisions, the court ruled that Virginia's "Division Statute" is constituitonal and applies in this case. (See prior posting.) The statute permits the majority of a congregation to decide to which branch of a church its property will belong when there has been a "division" in the church. In the latest decisions, the court first rejected the assertion by ECUSA and the Diocese that the eleven churches had in some way contracted away, waived, abandoned or relinquished their right to assert rights under the Division Statute. [Full text of opnion.]

In its second opinion (full text), the court rejected claims by ECUSA and the Diocese that Virginia's Division Statute violates the Contracts Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The court concluded that the Contracts Clause protects only those contractual rights that existed before the Division Statute was first enacted in 1867. It is not enough that a congregation was in existence prior to 1867; the protection of property rights the diocese or ECUSA had in a church's property extends only to specific parcels of property acquired before 1867. Any property acquired after that date would have been acquired subject to ownership provisions in the Division Statute. Since in 1867 under Virginia law denominational bodies or dioceses could not hold title to, or obtain enforceable contractual rights in, property, the Contracts Clause does not protect any rights of the diocese or ECUSA in church properties.

Yesterday's Washington Times reported on the decision.

TRO Issued To Stop Army Construction At Comanche Religious Site

In Comanche Nation v. United States, (WD OK, Aug. 18, 2008), an Oklahoma federal district court granted a temporary restraining order barring the U.S. Army from starting construction of a warehouse on the Ft. Sill Military Reservation. The Comanche Tribe claimed that the construction site at the edge of Medicine Bluffs is a significant religious and ceremonial site protected by federal law from disruption or interference. the court said that the questions going to the merits of the Tribe's claims "are serious, substantial, and difficult." According to yesterday's Army Times, Medicine Bluffs has been on the Register of Historic Places since 1974. Comanche Chairman Wallace Coffey said the Army had ignored the tribe's request that the warehouse be constructed elsewhere.

Missouri Governor Implementing Faith-Based Disaster Relief Initiative

Yesterday's St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports on Missouri Governor Matt Blunt's proposed Faith-Based Missouri Disaster Relief Initiative. The state's Emergency Management Agency and the University of Missouri Extension Service are organizing meetings around the state to recruit churches and train religious leaders in emergency response. The goal is to create a coordinated network of fully trained churches that the state can call on to provide relief services during natural disasters. United Methodist Church disaster relief coordinator, Karen Benson, said that local faith-based groups partnering with the state have informally agreed to refrain from proselytizing while furnishing disaster relief.

Christian Groups Enter China, Evading Ban on Foreign Missionaries

The Associated Press reported yesterday that a number of Christian groups came into China to proselytise during the Olympics, despite the Chinese ban on foreign missionaries. They entered on tourist visas, and told authorities they were involved in sports or cultural activities. However, once in the country, they began to reach out to individuals to share their faith. Among the groups sending people into China were Awaken Generation, the Southern Baptist Convention, and Youth With A Mission. Asked about the activities, China's religious affairs administration office said: "If foreigners do such things in China, they violate the law, and local religious departments and other departments should stop them."

Cleric-Penitent Privilege Held Inapplicable Where Pastor Is Not A Spiritual Advisor

In State of New Jersey v. J.G., (NJ App. Div., Aug. 20, 2008), a New Jersey appellate court held that a conversation between a clergyman and a father accused of sexually abusing his children was not protected by the state's cleric-penitent privilege. The children's mother reported the abuse to Pastor Glenford Brown who then contacted the father. While Brown knew the father, the father did not attend Brown's church. The court held:

(1) defendant did not ask and Brown did not offer to keep the conversation confidential; (2) Brown reached out to defendant – not as a spiritual advisor – but to protect defendant's children; and (3) Brown specifically told defendant he could not counsel him or even baptize him because defendant needed professional help. Clearly, the conversations between defendant and Brown are not protected by the privilege.

Yesterday's New Jersey Star-Ledger reported on the decision.

New IRS Publication on Taxation of Churches and Religious Institutions

The Internal Revenue Service has issued a revised version of its publication, Tax Guide for Churches and Religious Organizations. The 28-page multi-colored publication provides guidance on obtaining and keeping tax exempt status, employment taxes, unrelated business income taxes, employee business expenses, record keeping and filing requirements. [Thanks to Steven H. Sholk and Steve Sheinberg for leads on this.]

New Indonesian Law Permits Sharia-Compliant Government Bonds

An article by two Indonesian lawyers published in the August BNA World Securities Law Report [subscription required] discusses Indonesia's new Sovereign Syariah Commercial Paper law enacted in April of this year. The new law permits the Indonesian government to issue Sharia-compliant bonds to raise capital. The law provides for the bonds to be issued by the Ministry of Finance's newly created Sovereign Sukuk Issuance Co., and for the use of government assets as the underlying assets for the issuance of the sovereign sukuk (capital bonds). Authors Hanim Hamzah and Harly Siregar say that the new bonds that comply with Islamic law will give the government a better chance at raising funds in the Persian Gulf area, as well as from the Indonesia state pension fund. Corporations in Indonesia are already issuing this type of debt instruments, but this law will now allow the government to raise an expected $2 billion (US) in this form. There still remain, however a number of legal and tax uncertainties surrounding these financial instruments.