Ohio Church Groups Say They Will Try To Block Newly Authorized Slot Machines

After a long political battle, the Ohio legislature on Monday passed a balanced budget (H.B. 1) by authorizing the Governor to permit installation of slot machines (video lottery terminals "VLTs") at Ohio's seven race tracks. The slots are projected to bring in $933 million in revenue to the state. (Columbus Dispatch). Gov. Ted Strickland, an ordained Methodist minister, is expected to sign the bill. However, according to a Columbus Dispatch report yesterday, groups such as the Ohio Council of Churches and the anti-gambling task force of the United Methodist Church [background] say they will take legal action and launch a grass-roots campaign, to prevent moving ahead with the VLTs. They want the state to instead raise taxes to more directly fund the state's budget deficit. They say that the VLT's violate Art. 15, Sec. 6 of the Ohio Constitution that allows only the state lottery whose funds are to be used to support education. The Dispatch yesterday also published a Q&A setting out the official position on the legality of the slot machine plan and details of its proposed operation.

Suit Charges Military Contractor With Refusing To Accommodate Wearing of Hijab

In Houston (TX), a federal lawsuit charging religious discrimination has been filed against K.B.R., Inc. (the former Kellogg Brown & Root). The company is particularly known for its extensive work in Iraq under contracts with the military. The complaint (full text) in Tounkara v. K.B.R., Inc. (SD TX, filed 7/13/2009), alleges that K.B.R. violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by "failing to make a reasonable, religious accommodation to allow the plaintiff to wear her hijab (headscarf) in observance of her Muslim faith during her hours of employment." According to a sharply critical report by the Houston Press, Karen Tounkara, a Muslim, was hired by K.B.R. through a nursing agency to help prep its workers who were going to Iraq. K.B.R. informed Tounkara it had a policy that no employee can wear a head covering at work. It told her that she could wear her headscarf up to the company's gates, and could put it back on when she left.

Court Upholds University's Facilities Use Policy

In Rock for Life- UMBC v. Hrabowski, (D MD, July 8, 2009), a Maryland federal district court rejected claims by a student anti-abortion group that its 1st and 14th Amendment rights were violated by university restrictions on the location of a display sponsored by the group. The challenge to the University of Maryland, Baltimore County Policy on Facilities Use was filed after disputes over where on campus for the group's "Genocide Awareness" photo mural exhibit could be set up. During the course of the litigation, the University modified its policy. This led the court to dismiss as moot plaintiff's facial challenge to the Policy. The court then moved to plaintiff's "as applied" challenge. Using standards applicable to a limited public forum, the court rejected plaintiff's 1st Amendment claim. The court concluded that the University's actions under its regulations were narrowly tailored, content-neutral time, place and manner restrictions, motivated by safety, security and traffic-flow concerns. The court also rejected plaintiff's equal protection claims.

Lawsuit Challenges Congress' Decision To Add Motto and Pledge To Capitol Visitor Center

The Freedom from Religion Foundation yesterday filed suit in federal district court in Wisconsin challenging Congress' directive to the Architect of the Capitol to engrave the motto "In God We Trust" and the Pledge of Allegiance in the Capitol Visitor Center. The complaint (full text) in Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Ayers, (WD WI, filed 7/14/2009) alleges that the directive violates the Establishment Clause. An FFRF press release reports that the lawsuit was filed after both the House and Senate last week passed resolutions ordering the additions in response to threats by Sen. Jim DeMint last December to hold up the opening of the Visitor Center which he said failed to recognize the country's religious heritage. (See prior related posting.) AP also reports on the lawsuit.

Court Enjoins Community College's Sexual Harassment Policy As Overbroad

In Lopez v. Candaele, (CD CA, July 10, 2009), a California federal district court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of Los Angeles Community College District’s Sexual Harassment Policy. The court found that the policy is overbroad, prohibiting a substantial amount of protected speech. The case grew out of a class presentation by plaintiff, in which he spoke about his religion-based opposition to same-sex marriage. His professor called him a "fascist bastard," cut his speech short, and did not enter a grade on his evaluation sheet. (See prior posting.) However ultimately plaintiff was awarded a grade of A in the course. Alliance Defense Fund issued a release applauding the ruling, saying: "Christian students shouldn't be penalized for expressing their beliefs at a public college."

Senate Appropriations Bill Has Security Funds For Non-Profits; Extends Religious Worker Program

Last Thursday, the U.S. Senate passed its version of H.R. 2892, the Homeland Security Appropriations Act. A conference committee was appointed to reconcile differences between the Senate version and the version the House has already passed. Two interesting provisions are included in the Senate bill:

As reported by JTA, Title III's appropriations for the State Homeland Security Grant Program [pg. 30 of PDF] includes $20 million to protect high-risk non-profit institutions, including religious institutions, against terrorist attack. The Senate version appropriates $5 million more than the House version did for nonprofits.

Title V, Sec. 571 [pg. 95 of PDF], extends the controversial Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program until Sept. 30, 2012. However it requires USCIS to submit to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees by March 30, 2010 a report on the risks of fraud and noncompliance in the program and a detailed plan describing actions to be taken against those who do not comply with the conditions of their special visas-- followed by a progress report on action actually taken. (See prior related posting.) The House version of the Homeland Security Appropriations Act contains no provisions extending the Religious Worker Program that, under current law, expires this September.

Sikh Group Wants Governor To Veto Oregon Workplace Religious Freedom Act

Yesterday the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund wrote Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski, asking him to veto the Oregon Workplace Religious Freedom Act (SB 786) which was passed by the state legislature several weeks ago. (Full text of letter.) The bill generally requires employers to reasonably accommodate employees' religious practices and observances. SALDEF's concern, however, is the provision in the bill that still allows public and charter schools to prohibit teachers from wearing religious dress while engaged in the performance of duties as a teacher. This presumably would allow school districts to ban Sikh teachers from wearing their religiously-mandated dastaars (turbans). (SALDEF release.) The letter urges the governor to "veto SB 786, as proposed, and ask the Oregon legislature to approve a version of the bill that honestly and comprehensively protects religious freedom in the workplace."

Texas Board of Education Panel Splits On Role of Religion In History Curriculum

The Wall Street Journal yesterday reported on the work of the Texas State Board of Education's panel of experts who are reviewing the state's social studies curriculum. The panel is evenly divided between social conservatives and more moderate or liberal in-state university faculty with expertise in education or social sciences. (See prior posting.) The full text of each panel member's review is available online. According to the Wall Street Journal's report:

[A] divide has opened over how central religious theology should be to the teaching of history. Three reviewers, appointed by social conservatives, have recommended revamping the K-12 curriculum to emphasize the roles of the Bible, the Christian faith and the civic virtue of religion in the study of American history.... "We're in an all-out moral and spiritual civil war for the soul of America, and the record of American history is right at the heart of it," said Rev. Peter Marshall....

The conservative reviewers say they believe that children must learn that America's founding principles are biblical. For instance, they say the separation of powers set forth in the Constitution stems from a scriptural understanding of man's fall and inherent sinfulness, or "radical depravity," which means he can be governed only by an intricate system of checks and balances. The curriculum, they say, should clearly present Christianity as an overall force for good -- and a key reason for American exceptionalism, the notion that the country stands above and apart.

This summer, Texas social studies teachers will draft the actual recommendations to the Board for curriculum changes. [Thanks to Rabbi Michael Simon for the lead.]

Issues of Religion Largely Absent From Second Day of Sotomayor Hearings

Yesterday, at the second day of hearings on the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor as Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, religion, religious freedom and church-state issues received little attention either in questions posed to the nominee or in her answers. Don Byrd, who has been blogging live from the hearings, identifies three exchanges relating to religious issues. The full hearing transcripts are available via the Washington Post. Here are the relevant exchanges:

In questioning Sotomayor about her views on the Second Amendment, Sen. Orin Hatch asked: "OK. As I noted, the Supreme Court puts the Second Amendment in the same category as the First and the Fourth Amendments as pre-existing rights that the Constitution merely codified. Now, do you believe that the First Amendment rights, such as the right to freely exercise religion, the freedom of speech, or the freedom of the press, are fundamental rights?" To which Sotomayor replied: "Those rights have been incorporated against the states. The states must comply with them."

Sen. Lindsey Graham, expressing his concern about expansive interpretations of the Constitution said: "And that gets us to the speeches. That broad provision of the Constitution that's taken us from no written prohibition protecting the unborn, no written statement that you can't voluntarily pray in school, and on and on and on and on, and that's what drives us here, quite frankly.... [A] lot of us are concerned from the left and the right that unelected judges are very quick to change society in a way that's disturbing...."

Sen Diane Feinstein, asking about the overruling of precedent, referred to the Hein case that denied a taxpayer standing to challenge spending by President Bush's faith-based office. She said: "In a rare rebuke of his colleagues, Justice Scalia has sharply criticized Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito for effectively overruling the court's precedents without acknowledging that they were doing so. Scalia wrote in the Hein case ... 'Overruling prior precedent is a serious undertaking, and I understand the impulse to take a minimalist approach. But laying just claim to be honoring stare decisis requires more than beating a prior precedent to a pulp and then sending it out to the lower courts weakened, denigrated, more incomprehensible than ever, and yet somehow technically alive....'"

(See prior related posting.)

Evangelist Challenges University's Speech Policy

On Monday, a traveling Christian evangelist filed a federal lawsuit against Georgia Southern University, challenging its campus speech policy. The complaint (full text) in Bloedorn v. Grube, (SD GA, filed 7/13/2009), alleges that while the University has opened accessible areas on campus for outside speakers, it still requires application for a permit and reserves discretion to approve or disapprove any particular speaker. It also limits the length of the speaker's visit. Plaintiff Benjamin Bloedorn visits campuses 4 to 6 hours per day, for two or three days in a row to engage students in discussion about the existence of God and the teachings of Christianity. Bloedorn was arrested by a campus police officer after he insisted on speaking without applying for a permit. His lawsuit insists that the University's permit policy is an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech. Alliance Defense Fund announced the filing of the lawsuit.

Malaysian Police Investigate Reporter's Activities In Attending Mass Under False Pretenses

In Malaysia, where causing religious disharmony can be prosecuted as a crime, police are investigating two Muslim men who attended a Roman Catholic mass as part of an investigative article published in the Malay-language Al-Islam magazine. AP today reports that the article was intended to investigate rumors that Muslim teenagers were being converted to Christianity. The author found no evidence of this, but has created controversy by indicating in the article that he and a friend hid their Muslim identities when attending. They took communion and photographed their partially-eaten communion wafer. A police complaint was filed by a Catholic man, and Rev. Lawrence Andrew, the editor of the Catholic publication, the Herald, said the men had "insulted the Christians" by their actions.

Leahy To Introduce Hate Crimes Bill As Amendment To Defense Authorization Act

Sen. Patrick Leahy yesterday announced that he would introduce the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act as a bipartisan amendment to the National Defense Authorization bill this week. Last year the Senate approved the measure as an amendment to the Defense Authorization Bill, but it was removed in conference after opposition from the Bush White House. (See prior posting.) The most controversial portion of the bill expands coverage of existing hate crimes legislation to cover crimes aimed at victims because of their sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or disability. It also expands the situations in which the federal government can prosecute hate crimes based on race, religion or national origin by eliminating the requirement that they involve certain federally protected activities. The bill also provides for federal assistance grants to state and local governments, allows the federal government to prosecute in certain cases where states have failed to do so, and expands the statistics on hate crimes that will be collected by the federal government. The House passed a similar hate crimes measure in April as a free-standing bill. (See prior posting.)

Issues of Religion Play Little Role In First Day of Sotomayor Hearings

Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee held its first day of hearings on the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court. The day began with opening statements from each member of the Committee. Then the Senators from Sotomayor's home state of New York (Sens. Schumer and Gillibrand) introduced the nominee. The day's hearings closed with Sotomayor's opening statement. Issues of religion, religious freedom and church-state were not particularly prominent. The Washington Post has published the full text of all the statements. Here are the only references in them issues of religion:

Sen. Patrick Leahy:

Those who break barriers often face the added burden of overcoming prejudice.... The confirmation of Justice Louis Brandeis, the first Jewish American to be nominated to the high court, was a struggle rife with anti-Semitism and charges that he was a "radical". The commentary at the time included questions about "the Jewish mind" and how "its operations are complicated by altruism." Likewise, the first Catholic nominee had to overcome the argument that "as a Catholic he would be dominated by the pope."

Sen. Jeff Sessions:

Do I want a judge that allows his or her social, political, or religious views to change the outcome? Or, do I want a judge that impartially applies the law to the facts, and fairly rules on the merits, without bias or prejudice?

Sen. Chuck Schumer (discussing cases Sotomayor has decided):

And she upheld the First Amendment right of a prisoner to wear religious beads under his uniform.

Sen. Benjamin Cardin:

My grandparents came to America more than 100 years ago. I am convinced that they came to America not only for greater economic opportunities, but because of the ideals expressed in our Constitution, especially the First Amendment guaranteeing religious freedom.

My grandparents wanted their children to grow up in a country where they would be able to practice their Jewish faith and fully participate in their community and government. My father, one of their sons, became a lawyer, state legislator, circuit court judge and President of his synagogue. And now his son serves in the U.S. Senate.

While our Founding Fathers made freedom of religion a priority, equal protection for all races took longer to achieve.... I remember with great sadness how discrimination was not only condoned but, more often than not, actually encouraged against Blacks, Jews, Catholics, and other minorities in the community. There were neighborhoods that my parents warned me to avoid for fear of my safety because I was Jewish. The local movie theater denied admission to African Americans. Community swimming pools had signs that said "No Jews, No Blacks Allowed." Even Baltimore's amusement parks and sports clubs were segregated by race.

Sen Dick Durbin:

Your mother worked two jobs so she could afford to send you and your brothers to Catholic schools, and you earned scholarships to Princeton and Yale.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's introduction of Sotomayor included a quote from Justice Scalia that he "grew up with people of all religious and ethnic backgrounds."

Judge Sotomayor in her opening statement made no mention of religion, religious freedom or church-state issues.

An opinion piece from today's Wall Street Journal asks: "Why was Samuel Alito's Catholicism so much more discussed than Sonia Sotomayor's?"

FCC Change In TV Rules Impacts Many Church Wireless Microphone Systems

According to an ABP report yesterday, many churches will be surprised to learn that they have been affected by the Federal Communications Commission's decision requiring television stations, as of June 12, to end analog broadcasts. As part of the conversion, all stations were required to move to channels 2 through 51-- something made possible by the improved efficiency of digital transmissions. That allowed the FCC to also reallocate the 700 MHz wireless spectrum that had previously been used primarily for UHF channels 52 through 69. The lower half of the 700 MHz band was auctioned off to various telecommunications companies, while the upper half was reserved for a public safety network to be used by law enforcement, fire and safety forces and municipalities. (Background from Wikipedia.)

The problem is that many church sound systems operate in the 700 MHz range. That means that there may well be interference in some locations. Also these churches are apparently acting illegally in continuing to operate their systems. As explained in a posting last year on Geeks&God, the FCC adopted rules in late 2008 to allow the unlicensed use of "white spaces" between TV stations below 698 MHz. (FCC News Release, Nov. 4, 2008). However as of Feb. 17, 2009, wireless microphones using higher frequencies were to cease operating. Manufacturers no longer sell wireless microphone systems in the 700 MHz range and they offer discounts to churches that trade in their old systems for new ones in permitted ranges.

Groups Oppose Expansion of Virginia Islamic Saudi Academy

The Fairfax County, Virginia Board of Supervisors held a public hearing yesterday on the proposed expansion of the campus of the Islamic Saudi Academy. The controversial college and preparatory school has close ties with the Saudi government. Fox News reported yesterday that a coalition of around ten groups oppose the expansion. The spokesman for one of those groups, James Lafferty, chairman of the Virginia Anti-Shariah Task Force (VAST), says as to his group's opposition: "We're opposed to the operation of the Islamic Saudi Academy because it teaches and practices Shariah law. Shariah law is anti-constitutional and we feel that it is the ultimate improper land use here in the state where the Constitution was created." Others object because one of the Academy's graduates was convicted of joining Al Qaeda and plotting to assassinate President Bush, while another was arrested for boarding a plane carrying a kitchen knife. (See prior related posting.)

Lawsuit In Egypt Seeks To Rescind Prize Given To Controversial Writer

In Egypt, supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood have filed a lawsuit seeking to have the Ministry of Culture's State Award of Merit in Social Sciences withdrawn from author Sayed al-Qimni. Al Arabiya today reports that opponents object that: "His works deride Islam and he is skeptical about the message of Prophet Mohamed." Lawyer Nabih al-Wahsh who filed the suit has also called for impeachment of the Minister of Culture Farouk Hosni for approving the choice of Qimni. Previously a court ruled against attempts to ban Qimni's book Rab Haza al-Zaman (A God of this Age) by those who claimed it contained apostasy. Quimni has argued that Islam is a political system rather than a religion.

Russian Orthodox Church Gets New Power To Preview Duma Legislation

The Moscow Times reported last week that the Russian Orthodox Church will now be consulted in advance by United Russia deputies in the lower house of legislature so it can preview all legislation that will be considered by the State Duma. The agreement came after Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill conferred with two senior United Russia deputies over the Duma's ratification in May of the European Social Charter. Approval was required as part of Russia's membership in the Council of Europe. Krill objects to interpretations of provisions in the document that require public schools to offer sex education and require the creation of juvenile justice systems aimed at deterring youth from committing crimes. (Case Law Fact Sheet). Krill believes that parents, not the government, should be responsible for sex education and for discipline of their children.

World Football Regulator Warns Brazil's Team Over Religious Slogans On T-Shirts

FIFA, world football's governing body, has sent a warning letter to the Brazilian football federation after their players wore T-shirts with Christian slogans during the finals of the Confederations Cup last month. Apparently the T-shirts were under their jerseys, and were displayed after the game in victory photos. Yesterday's London Mail reports that most members of the Brazilian team are Pentecostalists with strong Christian beliefs. FIFA's Laws of the Game set out an interpretation of Law 4:

Players must not reveal undergarments showing slogans or advertising. The basic compulsory equipment must not have any political, religious or personal statements. A player removing his jersey or shirt to reveal slogans or advertising will be sanctioned by the competition organiser. The team of a player whose basic compulsory equipment has political, religious or personal slogans or statements will be sanctioned by the competition organiser or by FIFA.

[Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Amos N. Guiora, Religious Extremism: A Fundamental Danger, (South Texas Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 743, 2009).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere;

• Casey Luskin, Does Challenging Darwin Create Constitutional Jeopardy? A Comprehensive Survey of Case Law Regarding the teaching of Biological Origins, 32 Hamline Law Review 1 (2009).
• Don Ellinghausen, Jr., "In Standing Is the Preservation of His World": Justice Scalia and the Varieties of Natural-Religious Experience, 16 Missouri Environmental Law & Policy Review 474-520 (2009).
• Kent Greenawalt, The Rule of Law and the Exemption Strategy, 30 Cardozo Law Review 1513-1534 (2009); Marci A. Hamilton, A Response to Professor Greenawalt, 30 Cardozo Law Review 1535-1543 (2009).
• Andrew P. Morriss & Benjamin D. Cramer, Disestablishing Environmentalism, 39 Environmental Law 309-396 (2009).
• David M. Smolin, The Civil War As a War of Religion: A Cautionary Tale of Enslavement and Emancipation, 39 Cumberland Law Review 187-237 (2008-2009).
• Manisuli Ssenyonjo, Limits On the Freedom To Manifest One's Religion In Educational Institutions in Uganda and the United Kingdom [Abstract], 7 I.Con: International Journal of Constitutional Law 275-305 (2009).
• Religion in the Workplace. [Full text of all articles.] Foreword by Fouad A. Riad; articles by Kenneth D. Wald, Lorne Sossin, Francois Gaudu, Achim Seifert, Nurhan Sural, Mark Freedland, Lucy Vickers and William W. Van Alstyne; afterword by Alain Supiot. 30 Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 465-653 (2009).

Catholic Chaplains Complain About California's Proposed Lethal Injection Protocol

On June 30, the California Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections held a hearing on its Proposed Regulations on lethal injections (full text). Executions in California were suspended in 2006 after a federal district court in Morales v. Hickman raised questions about whether California's protocol for executions created too great a risk of extreme pain. Media coverage immediately after the June DRC hearings indicated that much of the testimony focused on broad opposition to capital punishment. (Los Angeles Times.) However on Friday, Tidings carried an article outlining a narrower objection to the proposed new regulations raised by Catholic prison chaplains.

The proposed regulations require that 45 days before execution:

3349.3.1(e) The Chaplain shall:
(1) Interview the inmate to assess the inmate’s spiritual and emotional well-being.
(2) Determine the inmate’s religious preferences and needs, next of kin, funeral or other requests, attitudes or thoughts on death and dying, and note any observations regarding the inmate’s emotional stability such as acceptance of the sentence of death.
(3) Formulate these observations into a written report and submit it to the Warden within sufficient time to meet the Warden’s 20-day report deadline.

Then ten days before execution:

3349.3.3(f) The Chaplain shall deliver a written report to the Warden regarding the emotional state of mind of the inmate. These observations shall be limited to contacts made within three days preceding preparation of the report.

Chaplains are concerned that these requirement may call for them to reveal information received in confidence from the prisoner which currently is protected by the clergy-penitent privilege.

Rights Group Says Arrest By Saudi Religious Police Led To Honor Killing

In Saudi Arabia, the Society for Defending Women’s Rights says that the country's religious police, the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, are ultimately responsible for the "honor killing" of two sisters by their brother. Qatar's The Peninsula reported yesterday that Society claimed religious police sparked the anger of the women's brother by arresting the women, ages 19 and 21, for mixing with unrelated males. Police put them in a Riyadh women's shelter. Their brother shot them, in the presence of their father, when the left the shelter on July 5. The Society called for the government to charge the brother with murder, and also to bring charges against the religious police involved in the case.

British House of Lords Keeps Free Speech Defense To Inciting Hatred Against Gays

In Britain last Thursday, the House of Lords, by a vote of 186-133, deleted from the proposed Coroners and Justice Bill section 61 which would have done away with a statutory free speech defense to the crime of inciting homophobic hatred. The defense is found in the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 which outlaws inciting hatred on the ground of sexual orientation, but goes on to provide:

In this Part, for the avoidance of doubt, the discussion or criticism of sexual conduct or practices or the urging of persons to refrain from or modify such conduct or practices shall not be taken of itself to be threatening or intended to stir up hatred.

The Labour government had proposed elimination of the defense, but Lord Waddington, former Conservative party Home Secretary, proposed an amendment to retain it which was the subject of Thursday's vote. The House of Lords has posted the full text of the debate on the amendment. The Independent and BBC News both reported on the House of Lords action.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Isom v. Lowe, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56922 (MD PA, July 6, 2009), a Pennsylvania federal district court held that prison officials were justified in taking a Muslim prisoner off the "Common Fare" diet after it was found that he was purchasing and consuming regular items from the Commissary that do not comply with the "Common Fare" diet.

In Riley v. Doe, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56406 (MD TN, July 2, 2009), a Tennessee federal district court rejected a complaint that prisoners of the Christian Identity faith are not permitted to meet for group worship. The denial stemmed merely from the mistaken belief by the prison director of religious services that Christian Identity was classified as a Security Threat Group.

In Miska v. Middle River Regional Jail, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56661 (WD VA, July 2, 2009), a Virginia federal district court rejected an inmate's complaint that his free exercise rights were violated when he was prevented from attending Communion and Confession one time while in segregated confinement.

In Caldwell v. Folino, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56838 (WD PA, July 1, 2009), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge concluded that an inmate's free exercise rights were not violated when corrections officers searched his medicine bag and made disparaging comments about its contents.

In Mayo v. Briggs, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57378 (ED VA, July 6, 2009), a Virginia federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations and dismissed an inmate's lawsuit for damages and a change in the jail's policy. Plaintiff claimed that authorities refused to permit him to attend Muslim Jumah services. The refusal was based on plaintiff's identifying himself as Christian, not Muslim, when he arrived at the jail.

In Mayne v. State, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57678 (D NJ, July 7, 2009), a New Jersey federal district court permitted plaintiff to proceed with his complaint that while under house arrest and electronic monitoring, his parole officer refused to permit him to attend Catholic religious services.

In Thomas v. Little, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57568 (WD TN, July 6, 2009), a Tennessee federal district court dismissed claims by an inmate that his free exercise rights, and his rights under RLUIPA were infringed by prison policy that allows Muslim inmates to buy prayer oil only from a single approved supplier.

In Anderson v. Harron, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57986 (D NJ, July 7, 2009), a New Jersey federal district court rejected an inmate's complaint that his rights under the 1st Amendment and RLUIPA were infringed when he was temporarily removed from the jail's Ramadan meal program. The court also rejected his complaint that the jail did not facilitate weekly group Jumah prayers among the Muslim prisoners.

Group Presses 2 California Cities To End Sectarian Invocations

The Freedom from Religion Foundation continues to demand that city councils across the country end the practice of opening their sessions with sectarian Christian prayer. Two California cities-- Tracy and Lodi-- are currently among its targets. The Tracy Press on Friday editorialized:

Tracy's prayer policy may be inclusive in its intentions, but it's exclusive in its practice of rotating only those religious leaders (all Christian, like the council) who have come forth to offer invocations. It makes political outsiders of those constituents who don't share religious beliefs.

Meanwhile the LA Church and State Examiner reports that Lodi City Council will consider a resolution next month to require that invocations be non-sectarian. However Navy Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt's "Pray in Jesus' Name Project" that favors Lodi's existing policy plans a prayer vigil at city hall on August 5, the scheduled date of the City Council vote.

Nominee To Head NIH Is Strong Advocate For Compatibilibty of Science and Faith

This past Wednesday, the White House announced the nomination of renowned geneticist Dr. Francis S. Collins to head the National Institutes of Health. Collins headed the NIH's Human Genome Project. Yesterday and today, articles in the Wall Street Journal and AlterNet focus on another part of Collins' biography-- his strong advocacy for the position that science (including evolutionary theory) and religious faith are compatible. In 2006, Collins authored a book titled The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. Francis has also founded the BioLogos Foundation, which describes its mission as follows:

BioLogos represents the harmony of science and faith. It addresses the central themes of science and religion and emphasizes the compatibility of Christian faith with scientific discoveries about the origins of the universe and life

BioLogos' press release on Collins' nomination says that if he is confirmed, his leadership role at BioLogos will be assumed by Drs. Darrel Falk and Karl Giberson.

UPDATE: The Senate confirmed Collins by voice vote on Aug. 7. (Fresno Bee.)

Summum's Challenge To Duchesne City Dismissed After Case Was Mooted

Last March, after the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Pleasant Grove City v. Summum that a Utah city need not accept a "Seven Aphorisms" monument for a local park where a 10 Commandments monument already stood, it remanded to the lower courts a more complicated companion case, Summum v. Duchesne City. (See prior posting.) The city responded by moving the 10 Commandments monument to a city cemetery, which Summum saw as essentially mooting the case. (See prior posting.) According to yesterday's Salt Lake Tribune, a Utah federal district court has now formally dismissed the lawsuit on Summum's motion to dismiss.

Ireland Passes New Blasphemy Law, Reducing Penalties for Violation

This week, Ireland's parliament, the Oireachtas, passed the Defamation Act 2009 to replace the Defamation Act 1961. Section 36 of the new law imposes a fine of up to 25,000 Euros on anyone who publishes or utters blasphemous matter. In defining the offense, the new law provides:

(2) For the purposes of this section, a person publishes or utters blasphemous matter if—
(a) he or she publishes or utters matter that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial
number of the adherents of that religion, and
(b) he or she intends, by the publication or utterance of the matter concerned, to cause such outrage.

(3) It shall be a defence to proceedings for an offence under this section for the defendant to prove that a reasonable person would find genuine literary, artistic, political, scientific, or academic value in the matter to which the offence relates.

(4) In this section "religion" does not include an organisation or cult—
(a) the principal object of which is the making of profit, or
(b) that employs oppressive psychological manipulation— (i) of its followers, or
(ii) for the purpose of gaining new followers.

Ireland's Constitution (Art. 40) requires that the country have a law banning blasphemy. the new law substantially reduces the penalty for the offence from that in the 1961 Defamation Act (Sec. 13) that provides a fine and up to 7 years in prison for blasphemy. Reuters reported yesterday that atheists say they will quickly test the new law. They claim it is discriminatory by protecting only religious beliefs.

Arizona Governor Signs Students' Religious Liberties Act

On July 10, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed HB 2357, the Students' Religious Liberties Act. It bars public schools from discriminating against parents or students on the basis of religious viewpoints or expression, including religious viewpoints included in class assignments, artwork or coursework. It provides that students may pray or engage in religious activities or expression before, during and after the school day in the same manner that students are allowed to engage in nonreligious expression or activities.

Students are permitted to wear clothing that displays a religious message, or religious jewelry, to the same extent that clothing or jewelry with other messages or symbols is allowed. The law specifically, though, permits banning of clothing and accessories denoting criminal street gang affiliation. The new law goes on to provide that it shall not be interpreted to require any student to participate in prayer or other religious activity, or to otherwise violate a student's constitutional rights. Finally it requires exhaustion of internal administrative complaint procedures before a parent or student may bring a lawsuit to enforce the provisions of the statute. AP reported on the signing of the bill.

President Obama Meets With Pope Benedict XVI

President Barack Obama and Pope Benedict XVI held private talks for about 40 minutes this afternoon at the Vatican. Reuters and AFP both report on the meeting at which Obama briefed the Pope on the just completed G-8 Summit meetings. They also discussed the sensitive issue of bioethics on which the two have significant disagreements. Before the President arrived at the Vatican, Michelle Obama and their children Malia and Sasha were given a private tour of St Peter's Basilica and the Sistine Chapel. After the private talks, the President introduced his wife and daughters, as well as his mother-in-law, Marian Robinson, to the Pope. Michelle Obama joined the President and Benedict XVI for the traditional exchange of gifts.

A good deal of press attention has been directed at the gifts that the two leaders exchanged. The Pope gave Obama a copy of the Vatican's document on bioethics, Dignitas Personae, as well as a copy of his newest encyclical, Caritas in Veritate (Charity in Truth). (See prior posting.) Obama said light-heartedly that this would give him some reading material for the plane. The Pope also gave Obama a mosaic depicting St. Peter's Square. Meanwhile, Obama presented the Pope with a stole that had been draped for 18 years on top of the remains of Saint John Neumann, the first American bishop to be formally canonized. The Washington Post has a lengthy account of the meticulous efforts that went into the US choice of this gift.

Ahead of the meeting, commentators suggested that the Vatican is more willing to seek common ground with Obama than are the American Bishops who have been more confrontational. The New York Times yesterday reported on the differences in approach.

British Methodists Ban Its Members From Joining British National Party

Ekklesia reported yesterday that Britain's Methodist Church has passed a resolution at its annual conference providing that: "No member of the Church can also be a member of a political party whose constitution, aims or objectives promote racism. This specifically includes, but is not solely limited to, the British National Party." The resolution does not ban BNP members from attending Methodist churches without becoming church members. Earlier this year, the Church of England banned its clergy from joining the right wing British National Party, (see prior posting) but the Methodists become the first major denomination to ban all members from doing so. Other Christian denominations have merely called for their members not to vote for the BNP. Recently the BNP has tried to appeal to Christians by claiming it is protecting Britain's "Christian heritage."

Canadian FLDS Faces Property, Polygamy Prosecution, Issues

While the U.S. media have given a good deal of attention to the FLDS Church members living in the twin towns of Colorado City, AZ and Hildale, UT, there is also a group of FLDS members in the Canadian town of Bountiful, in British Columbia. This week reports surfaced on two rather interesting developments affecting that community.

Yesterday's Toronto Globe & Mail focused on how litigation to reform the FLDS United Effort Plan Trust will impact FLDS property in Bountiful that is also owned by the trust. Bruce Wisan, who was appointed by a Utah court as special fiduciary to administer and reform the UEP trust, says that there may need to be a housing board chosen from the Bountiful community to deal separately with privatizing the Canadian properties. Wisan also says that if the Utah court approves privatization,wives names will be added to their husband's on deeds for the properties-- giving attention to which wives live in which houses.

Meanwhile, the leaders of each of the two FLDS factions in Bountiful have been criminally charged with polygamy by a British Columbia prosecutor. One of the defendants, Winston Blackmore, is seeking to have the indictments quashed. Yesterday's Toronto Globe & Mail reports that B.C. Supreme Court Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, in a memo to counsel, indicated doubts that she had jurisdiction to order dismissal of a case that has not yet been appealed to the Supreme Court. Therefore she suggested to counsel that they file a new petition, seeking review of former attorney-general Wally Oppal's decision to essentially "shop" for prosecutors until he found one who was willing to file the polygamy charges.

ACLU Objects To Jail's Censorship Of Biblical Verses In Correspondence

An ACLU press release yesterday disclosed that the ACLU has written the Superintendent of Virginia's Rappahannock Regional Jail (full text of letter) demanding that it end its rather unusual policy on censorship of incoming letters to inmates. The jail takes out all Biblical passages from incoming mail, as well as any material inserted into a letter by cutting and pasting it from the Internet. The letter says in part: "The principle that religious correspondence must not be saddled with restrictions inapplicable to non-religious correspondence is so settled in law that prison and jail officials who impose such restrictions forfeit qualified immunity and become subject to suit in their personal capacities." Driving home its pint, the letter also observed: "Even the novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky had ready access to scripture while incarcerated in a Siberian prison camp in tsarist Russia."

Church Controversy Moves To Florida State Court

In Palm City Florida, a state court lawsuit was filed Wednesday by seven members of the Palm City Christian Church against the church's pastor, Anthony Galbicka. TC Palm reports the suit charges the pastor with breach of fiduciary duty and seeks a ruling "ousting" Pastor Tony and voiding "improper and/or illegal" actions he took. Elders of the 80-member congregation, in order to deal with financial problems, earlier this year recommended budget cuts, including cuts in Pastor Tony's compensation. The complaint alleges that after the meeting, Galbicka "sought to organize a plan to silence his critics, seize control of the (church and) preserve his income." He had the Sheriff's office issue trespass warnings against three members who are among the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. When the three came to the church for Sunday services in May, they were turned away by a sheriff's deputy. Then in June, Pastor Galbicka, after revoking the membership of 10 church members, called a meeting at which all of the elders were removed and he was elected and given the "combined authority of pastor-president-director-elder-deacon."

In a letter to the congregation, Galbicka said the members he kept away from the church engaged in "physical abuse, intense & unrestrained anger & hatred, cursing, disrespect for law enforcement, threats, pushing, foolish insults & reviling."

House Passes Resolution Calling for Motto To Be Added To Visitor Center

The House of Representatives yesterday, by a vote of 410-8, passed H. Con. Res. 131, directing the Architect of the Capitol to engrave the Pledge of Allegiance and the National Motto, "In God We Trust," in the Capitol Visitor Center. Reporting yesterday on the House action, the Fresno Bee said that Sen. Jim DeMint last summer threatened to delay the opening of the Visitor Center, in part because it failed to honor the country's religious heritage. (See prior posting.) The Concurrent Resolution still needs to be passed by the Senate

Questions Raised Over Canadian Prime Minister At Funeral Mass

Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper has created at least a protocol stir. Last Friday he attended the New Brunswick funeral of former Canadian governor general Romeo Leblanc, a Catholic. St. John's (NB) Telegraphic Journal and CTV Toronto both reported yesterday that a television clip of Harper, a Protestant, receiving communion at the Catholic funeral mass, raises a question of what he did with the communion wafer he received. (YouTube report.) A television camera shows Harper accepting the wafer with his right hand, but does not show him consuming it, even though a spokesman for the Prime Minister says that he did. Monsignor Brian Henneberry, vicar general and chancellor of the Diocese of Saint John, says that if Harper accepted the host but did not consume it: "it's worse than a faux pas, it's a scandal from the Catholic point of view." The press has speculated that Harper was confused about the protocol, or expected the priest to invite everyone to consume the wafer, as is done in some Protestant traditions. Separate questions have been raised as to whether Harper should have accepted the communion wafer at all at the Mass. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

House Climate Change Bill Includes Provisions Of Interest

On June 26, the U.S. House of Representatives passed and sent to the Senate the massive American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (HR 2454). Several provisions in the climate bill are of interest to followers of church-state issues:

• Section 202 includes faith institutions and other non-profits in the group of nonresidential buildings that are eligible for assistance in retrofitting to achieve energy efficiency and improvements in water use.

The Washington Post last week reported that this provision was inserted at the last minute at the urging of a coalition developed by the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations. the coalition also included the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the National Council of Churches, United Jewish Communities, Rev. Joel Hunter of the Florida-based mega-church Northland, Rev. Jim Ball who heads the Evangelical Environmental Network, and Sojourners leader Rev. Jim Wallis. The coalition is working to increase the subsidy beyond the current 50%. Meanwhile the version of the climate bill being considered in the Senate does not contain a similar provision.

• Section 495 allows faith-based groups to be included as recipients of USAID funds to provide assistance to vulnerable developing countries in creating climate change adaptation plans.
  
• Section 482 protects Indian tribes from having certain culturally sensitive information that is obtained by the federal government disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act. Under the bill, the Interior Department, in cooperation with states and Indian tribes, is to develop a National Wildlife Habitat Corridors Information Program. However, information received regarding Native American human remains, or about resources, cultural items, uses, or activities identified by an Indian tribe as traditional or cultural because of the long-established significance or ceremonial nature to the Indian tribe may not be disclosed under FOIA if the disclosure may cause a significant invasion of privacy, risk harm to the human remains or resources, cultural items, uses, or activities, or if it would impede the use of a traditional religious site.

9th Circuit Vacates Preliminary Injunction Against Pharmacy Board Regulations

In Stormans Inc. v. Selecky, (9th Cir., July 8, 2009), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a preliminary injunction issued by a federal district court enjoining enforcement of Washington State Pharmacy Board regulations that require pharmacists to fill all prescriptions (including Plan B, the "morning after" contraceptive) even if doing so violates their religious beliefs. The court concluded that the trial judge had incorrectly applied heightened scrutiny to the regulations. (See prior posting.) The 9th Circuit held that the Pharmacy Board rules are neutral regulations of general applicability that need only meet a rational basis test:

That the rules may affect pharmacists who object to Plan B for religious reasons does not undermine the neutrality of the rules. The Free Exercise Clause is not violated even though a group motivated by religious reasons may be more likely to engage in the proscribed conduct.

The court remanded the case with this explanation:

We hold that the district court abused its discretion in applying an erroneous legal standard of review, failing to properly consider the balance of hardships and the public interest, and entering an overbroad injunction. On remand, the district court must apply the rational basis level of scrutiny to determine whether Appellees have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits. The district court must also determine whether Appellees have demonstrated that they are likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, whether the balance of equities tips in the favor of the three Appellees, and whether the public interest supports the entry of an injunction. If the court finds in favor of Appellees, it must narrowly tailor any injunctive relief to the specific threatened harms raised by Appellees.

In its opinion, the 9th Circuit included an extensive discussion of standing and ripeness. It refused to decide whether a for-profit corporation can assert its own free exercise rights. Instead it concluded that the corporate plaintiff could properly assert the free exercise rights of the individual owner/directors in the family owned pharmacy. Individual pharmacists also had standing. Judge Clifton wrote a short concurring opinion, rejecting the majority's holding that it could not consider legislative history in deciding whether a law is neutral and generally applicable.

(It is worth noting that last year, the same panel of the 9th Circuit refused to stay the preliminary injunction pending the appeal that it decided yesterday.) The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports on yesterday's decision.

Activities of White House Faith-Based Director Are Outlined

Beliefnet yesterday carried an interesting portrayal of the activities of 26-year old Joshua DuBois, director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Every morning he sends a devotional message to President Obama's Blackberry, and daily receives some 750 e-mails from religious leaders, government officials and reporters. DuBois speaks to various religious groups, meets with a wide variety of religious leaders (as well as with secularists), and helps write Obama's speeches that deal with religion. In his private life, DuBois is a Big Brother to a teenager in Boston. He also keeps up a 5-year relationship with his girl friend. DuBois was raised in the African Methodist Episcopal Church an associate pastor at a small African-American Pentecostal church while he was an undergraduate at Boston University.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post reports that yesterday the Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships held its first face-to-face meeting at White House offices. Previously the Council met through telephone conference calls.

Police Say Theft of Body May Have Been For Religious Ritual

Stamford, Connecticut police are investigating the theft of a young girl's body yesterday from a Connecticut cemetery, saying they suspect some sort of ritualistic religious motivation. They say "a lot of things point to" that conclusion. AP reports that the body was that of a 2-year old girl who had lived much longer than expected in light of a condition that kept her brain from developing fully. Police say that followers of religions such as Palo Mayombe might have targeted this body-- buried in 2007-- in order to obtain the perceived mystic power that caused her to survive so long.

Pope "Gently Fires" Officials Responsible For Lifting Excommunication of Holocaust Denier

Zenit, the National Catholic Reporter and the London Mail all report that yesterday at the Vatican, the other shoe dropped in the embarrassing lifting by Pope Benedict XVI of the excommunication of Holocaust-denying Lefebvrite Bishop Richard Williamson. (See prior posting.) In March, the Pope wrote a letter to the Bishops essentially apologizing for the move which strained relations between the Vatican and the Jewish community. (See prior posting.) Now, in a letter titled Ecclesiae Unitatem, issued by the Pope "motu propio" (on his own initiative), Benedict XVI eliminated the autonomy of the Ecclesia Dei Commission that had been set up by Pope John Paul II to handle relations with the with the rejectionist French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and his Society of St. Pius X. As explained by the National Catholic Reporter:

the pope today restructured the Vatican office that handles relations with the traditionalist world -- and, in effect, gently fired the officials who presided over the earlier fiasco.

Under the Pope's new pronouncement, the Ecclesia Dei Commission will be supervised by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith-- currently headed by American Cardinal William Levada. The restructuring eliminates the positions at the Commission previously held by Colombian Cardinal Dario Castrillon-Hoyos and his deputy, Italian Monsignor Camille Perl. The two former officials had played key roles in the decision to lift the excommunication of 4 right-wing bishops, including Williamson, last January.

Massachusetts Sues Challenging Constitutionality of DOMA

Yesterday the state of Massachusetts filed suit in federal district court challenging the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The complaint (full text) in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (D MA, filed 7/8/2009), alleges that in enacting the law, the federal government violated the 10th Amendment and exceeded its powers under the Spending Clause. The complaint alleges in part:

In 2004, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts became the first state to end the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage..... Congress’s decision to enact a federal definition of marriage rejected the long-standing practice of deferring to each state's definition of marriage and contravened the constitutional designation of exclusive authority to the states. From its founding until DOMA was enacted in 1996, the federal government recognized that defining marital status was the exclusive prerogative of the states and an essential aspect of each state's sovereignty, and consistently deferred to state definitions when the marital status of an individual was used as a marker of eligibility for rights or protections under federal law.

Now, because of Section 3 of DOMA, married individuals in same-sex relationships are both denied access to critically important rights and benefits and not held to the same obligations and responsibilities arising out of marriage or based on marital status. DOMA precludes same-sex spouses from a wide range of important protections that directly affect them and their families, including federal income tax credits, employment and retirement benefits, health insurance coverage, and Social Security payments. In enacting DOMA, Congress overstepped its authority, undermined states’ efforts to recognize marriages between same-sex couples, and codified an animus towards gay and lesbian people.

The Boston Globe reports on the lawsuit. State Attorney General Martha Coakley's office has issued a press release along with links to a transcript and recording of yesterday's press conference announcing the action.

California Cities Welcome Sikh Police Officers

The Sikh American Legal Defense Fund today announced that six California police departments have reaffirmed their commitment to equal employment opportunities for Sikhs. Their religiously mandated turbans and uncut hair will not be impediments to their being hired. Last month police chiefs in Yuba City, Sutter County, Richmond, San Pablo, Hercules, and Walnut Creek, California all confirmed that Sikhs are welcome to join their forces.

Yankees Settle Lawsuit Over Restrictions During Playing of "God Bless America"

The New York Times and AP reported yesterday that a federal lawsuit filed last April against the New York Yankees and the city of New York has been settled. Plaintiff, Bradford Campeau-Laurion, claimed he was the victim of religious and political discrimination when a police officer enforced a policy of restricting fan movement during the playing of "God Bless America"-- a song played during the 7th inning stretch at Yankee baseball games. Ushers typically blocked some exits while the song was played. Campeau-Laurion says a police officer ejected him from the old Yankee Stadium last season when he tried to walk to the rest room. Officials say he was arrested after acting in a disorderly manner. In exchange for plaintiff dropping the lawsuit, the city of New York agreed to pay $10,001 in damages and $12,000 in attorneys' fees. Also, in a stipulation (full text) filed as part of the settlement, the Yankees say that they have no policy or practice at the new Yankee stadium that imposes any special restrictions on fans moving around the stadium during playing of "God Bless America." In a release, the New York Civil Liberties Union said: "This settlement ensures that the new Yankee Stadium will be a place for baseball, not compelled patriotism." [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Pope Issues Encyclical On Globalization and Econmic Development

Yesterday, on the eve of the G-8 economic summit in Italy, Pope Benedict XVI issued his third encyclical, Caritas in Veritate (Charity in Truth). The document includes extensive discussion of issues relating to global economic development. The Vatican also issued a summary synthesizing the highlights of the longer document. Describing the wide-ranging document, the New York Times observed: "In many ways, the document is a puzzling cross between an anti-globalization tract and a government white paper, another signal that the Vatican does not comfortably fit into traditional political categories of right and left." Here is one excerpt from the encyclical that has garnered a good deal of press attention:

In the face of the unrelenting growth of global interdependence, there is a strongly felt need, even in the midst of a global recession, for a reform of the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth. One also senses the urgent need to find innovative ways of implementing the principle of the responsibility to protect and of giving poorer nations an effective voice in shared decision-making....

To manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration: for all this, there is urgent need of a true world political authority....

Obviously it would have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions from all parties, and also with the coordinated measures adopted in various international forums. Without this ... international law would risk being conditioned by the balance of power among the strongest nations. The integral development of peoples and international cooperation require the establishment of a greater degree of international ordering.... They also require the construction of a social order that at last conforms to ... the interconnection between moral and social spheres, and to the link between politics and the economic and civil spheres, as envisaged by the Charter of the United Nations.

In Louisiana, Catholic Death-Row Inmates Will Have Access To Mass

Catholic prisoners on death row at Louisiana's maximum-security state penitentiary at Angola will now have an opportunity to celebrate mass. Yesterday's New Orleans Times-Picayune reports on a settlement reached in a lawsuit brought by the ACLU on behalf of death-row inmate Donald Lee Leger who objected that mostly Baptist religious services were shown on television sets. Only one Catholic Mass was televised to death-row inmates between June and December 2008. Under the settlement, the prison will offer inmates the opportunity to view Catholic mass on television, while other prisoners who prefer Baptist preachers will be offered earphones to listen to them instead. Also Catholic clergy will be welcome to hold Mass on death row and hear inmates' confessions, which will not be recorded or monitored. Outside of death row, Angola prison has seven churches and a Bible College. (See prior related posting.)

Turkey's Government Unhappy With Planned Reality TV Show Aimed At Conversion

Turkey's Religious Affairs Directorate is refusing to send an imam to appear on a new reality television program being launched in September by Istanbul-based television station Kanal T. Reuters last Friday reported that the planned show, Penitents Compete, will feature a rabbi, an imam, a priest and a Buddhist monk, each of whom will try, on camera, to convert ten atheists. The atheists will be pre-screened for non-belief by a team of theologians. Each convert will win a trip to his or her new religion's holy site-- Mecca, the Vatican, Jerusalem or Tibet. Hamza Aktan, chairman of Turkey's High Board of Religious Affairs, said: "Doing something like this for the sake of ratings is disrespectful to all religions. Religion should not be a subject for entertainment programs."

Malaysian Court Says Art Director Died A Muslim-- No Jurisdiction To Hear Family's Objections

In Malaysia, the Selangor High Court has ruled that art director Mohan Singh will be buried according to Muslim rites by the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (Mais). Today's New Straits Times reports on the complicated decision. Mohan died May 25, and his family claimed he was a practicing Sikh. However on June 4, the Syariah court, in response to an application by Mais, ruled that Mohan had converted to Islam in 1992 and had died a Muslim. Mohan's family, who knew nothing about Mohan's purported conversion, filed suit in the High Court seeking an order that Mohan's body be released to his family. That application was refused yesterday and the body was ordered released to Mais instead. High Court Judge Rosnaini Saub ruled that Mohan's 1992 conversion certificate was sufficient to give the Syariah court jurisdiction. Since Mohan's family are not Muslims, they have no standing to present their contentions to the Syariah court, and they cannot present their claims that Mohan did not convert to the civil court because it lacks jurisdiction once the conversion certificate has been presented. An article last month by Deborah Loh presents the Mohan family's side of the case.

UPDATE: Malaysian Insider reported Tuesday that Mohan Singh's family has filed an appeal with the Court of Appeal in Putrajaya, even though Mohan was buried Monday night in a Muslim cemetery.

Britain's International Development Program Will Double Aid To Faith-Based Groups

Ekklesia reports that a White Paper issued yesterday by Britain's Department for International Development promises to double the funding for faith-based groups providing international aid. The report, titled Building Our Common Future, promises (at Sec. 7.48) that the government will: "double support to faith based groups recognising the unique contribution that they can make in both delivering development on the ground, and connecting with communities here and abroad." In a press release yesterday accompanying the report, International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander says: "The White Paper represents a fundamental shift in the way the UK delivers development aid, refocusing resources onto fragile countries and for the first time treating security and justice as a basic service alongside health, education, water and sanitation."

IRS Delay In Granting Tax-Exempt Status Questioned

A press release issued yesterday by the Thomas More Law Center questions the propriety of a delay by the Internal Revenue Service in granting tax exempt status to the Coalition for Life of Iowa. The IRS has questioned the "educational" nature of the Coalition's materials, prayer meetings, talks and other Pro-Life activities. Apparently the IRS also says that in order to receive 501(c)(3) status, the Coaliltion must agree to limit its "picketing" and "protesting" of Planned Parenthood. According to theTMLC press release: "The repeated questioning of the Coalition suggests that the IRS may be denying or delaying tax-exempt status to an eligible organization based solely upon its religious affiliation and speech. Many other organizations regularly advocate on both sides of these issues, and they have not been hindered in obtaining or maintaining tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3). "

Suit Challenges Ten Commandments On Display In Kentucky Courthouse

A federal lawsuit was filed last week challenging the display of the Ten Commandments in the courthouse in yet another Kentucky county. Yesterday's Lexington (KY) Herald-Leader reports that the ACLU has sued Jackson County and Judge-Executive William O. Smith seeking an injunction and a declaratory judgment that nine copies of the Ten Commandments on walls at various places in the courthouse in McKee (KY) violate the Establishment Clause. Separately, the ACLU has asked the state Administrative Office of the Courts to remove a large copy of the Ten Commandments on display in the court room in the Jackson County courthouse.

UPDATE: The July 11 Louisville Courier-Journal reports in more detail on the displays at issue. Framed copies of the Ten Commandments are posted at both entrances to the courthouse, outside several offices and next to a woman's restroom. Separate from these, and not the object of the ACLU's complaint, a Foundations of American Law and Government display (which includes the 10 Commandments among other historical documents) stands in the rear of the courthouse.

BJC Publishes Analysis of Sotomayor's Religion Decisions

The Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty has published a new report evaluating the free exercise and establishment clause opinions written by Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor (download of full text). It concludes:

While Sotomayor’s written record raises no red flags, it also fails to provide complete assurance to those who are most concerned about our fragile religious freedom rights. In the free exercise cases, she displays careful attention to protecting religious rights, including in prisons where courts generally give deference to government officials. Likewise, these cases demonstrate an emphasis on the importance of assessing the individual’s specific religious claim. This approach illustrates an expansive view of religious freedom that does not depend on the approval of the majority. Her religious display cases demonstrate the fact-sensitive nature of such disputes, but tell us little about where she would draw the line between permissible acknowledgements of religion and unconstitutional displays that send a message of endorsement of religion by the government. Beyond those cases, her record gives little indication of her views of the Supreme Court’s various Establishment Clause standards or how she is likely to decide such cases.

Sotomayor’s writings include few if any statements articulating how the First Amendment protects religious liberty, promotes the voluntary nature of religion, prevents governmental interference in religion and tends to reduce conflict among religions. Still, her record offers positive signs that she will be a thoughtful, fair-minded jurist in protecting religious freedom.

[Thanks to Don Byrd for the lead.]

Air Force Rejects Flyover Request For Rally Sponsored By Christian Group

For the first time in 42 years, the U.S. Air Force has refused a "flyover request" for the "God and Country Rally" sponsored by the Christian Defense Coalition over the July 4 weekend. (Coalition Press Release.) The Pentagon's e-mail message (full text) rejecting the request says in part: "Air Force and DoD policy prohibit support for events which appear to endorse, selectively benefit, or favor any special interest group, religious or ideological movement." The Christian Defense Coalition says that the annual rally, held in Nampa, Idaho, honors those serving in the U.S. armed forces, and does not promote one religious faith tradition. Coalition director, Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, asks: "Will the new policy of President Obama be that a person has to surrender their faith tradition to honor and pay tribute to our courageous men and women who serve in the military?"

Daily Kos yesterday, reporting on developments, quotes Military Religious Freedom Foundation president Mikey Weinstein's strong support of the Air Force's decision. Weinstein, in his typically blunt fashion, said: "To those in the fundamentalist Christian cabal who vigorously oppose this long sought, terrific decision by the U.S. Air Force, may I suggest that they consider holding their event next year in Kim Jung Il's North Korea or the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as neither of those countries have a separation of Church and State as we do in beautiful America."

Israel's President Addresses Interfaith Conference In Kazakhstan

Last week, Israel's President Shimon Peres delivered the keynote address (full text) at an Interfaith Conference in Kazakhstan attended by hundreds of Muslim leaders from the Middle East and around the world, as well as by Israel's chief rabbis. (Background.) Peres' address was often theological in its approach to Islamic terrorism and Middle East peace. He said in part:

While the monotheistic and humanistic believers, Christians, Muslims and Jews, used to believe that there was just one God for all, compassionate, merciful and righteous, there are nowadays others, luckily a minority, that sanctify a different God, a God that permits massacres, forgives cruelty, and calls upon his believers to destroy, kill, lie and ruin. This distorted stream constitutes a defamation of the Lord. It is not a religion, it is a crime, a crime against God and man. We must separate religion from terror. This should be a common effort by all believers, regardless of faith, creed or gender....

Cultivating interfaith ties of understanding and friendship is vital, not only in interfaith relations, but in the religions' perception of God. The first question is always whether God created man in His image, or whether man is trying to create God in his compromised image. Whether we should adopt God's moral code, or whether we should refer our personal desires to God.... Only God who created man has the right to determine life.... God had no partners in the creation of the world, so there is nobody that can declare war against.

Group Sues To Get Kentucky "In God We Trust" License Plate

AP yesterday reported that a Kentucky group, Reclaim Our Culture Kentuckiana (ROCK), has filed a lawsuit challenging the rejection of its application to sponsor a special "In God We Trust" state license plate. The state's Transportation Cabinet rejected the request partly because ROCK promotes "a specific faith or religious position." The lawsuit claims both that religion is not ROCK's primary purpose and that the basis for denial amounts to unconstitutional religious discrimination. Rep. Hubie Collins, chairman of the Kentucky House transportation committee, says he supports an "In God We Trust" plate, but thinks the state should issue it. He does not believe that a private group should profit from use of the national motto. (See prior related posting.)

Upgrade of Russia-Vatican Relationships Is In the Works

According to AFP, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev told Italian media yesterday that Russia is considering upgrading its relations with the Vatican to full diplomatic relations. The Russian Orthodox Church has, both historically and recently, had somewhat tense relationships with the Catholic Church. AP, also reporting on the interview ahead of the G-8 Summit in Italy says that Medvedev declined to comment on whether Pope Benedict XVI would visit Russia in the near future.

Recent Articles and Forthcoming Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Suzie Chiodo, Big M, Little Freedom: Accommodating Religion in a Secular Society, (June 22, 2009).
• Sadiq Reza, Islam’s Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure in Islamic Doctrine and Muslim Practice, (Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2009).
• Patrick McKinley Brennan, Self-Love and Forgiveness: A Holy Alliance?, (in Forgiveness, Darlene Weaver, ed., Forthcoming).

Forthcoming Books:

• Mano Singham, God vs. Darwin: The War between Evolution and Creationism in the Classroom, (Rowan & Littlefield, Oct. 2009).
• Sean Oliver-Dee, The Caliphate Question: The British Government and Pan-Islamic Governance, (Lexington Books, Aug. 2009).
• Frederick M. Shepherd, Christianity and Human Rights: Christians and the Struggle for Global Justice, (Lexington Books, July 2009).

British Chief Rabbi Criticizes Court's Decision On Admission To Jewish Schools

Britain's Chief Rabbi, Sir Jonathan Sacks, writes in last Thursday's Jewish Chronicle, sharply criticizing an appellate court decision that struck down the admissions policy of a publicly-funded Jewish school in London. The Court of Appeal held that JFS, by following the traditional Orthodox definition of who is a Jew, engaged in "racial" discrimination rather than in admissions based on religious preferences. (See prior posting.) Sacks argues:

[I]f Jewish schools are compelled by English law to impose a test of religious practice instead of the existing test of membership of the Jewish faith, they will no longer be able to teach the Jewish faith to those who have little or no experience of practising it.... The implications of this ruling are vast and affect us all. To be told now that Judaism is racist, when Jews have been in the forefront of the fight against racism in this country, is distressing. To confuse religion and race is a mistake.

Court Orders Sikh Temple Directors To Disclose Contact Information

An election last year at the Sikh Temple Gurdwara in Yuba City, California brought in new directors who promised reform. Today's Marysville (CA) Appeal-Democrat reports on a state trial court decision last week that requires the Temple's 73 directors to furnish their addresses, phone numbers and e-mail contacts before meeting again. Fellow-director Sukraj S. Pamma sought the information, over privacy objections by some of those who would be required to disclose the data. Responding in part to the privacy concerns, the court's order provided that plaintiff is not to disclose the director information to anyone other than his attorneys and other directors. The Temple board must wait 3 weeks after furnishing the contact information before meeting again. Reform directors say the lawsuit is merely a delaying strategy by opponents who hope to eventually regain power.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise and Establishment Clause Cases

In Cook v. Long, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54159 (ED MO, June 3, 2009), a Missouri federal district court rejected an inmate's claim that 1st Amendment free exercise rights were infringed because he was allowed only one magazine subscription.

In Strope v. McKune, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55179 (D KA, June 30, 2009), a Kansas federal district court rejected an inmate's complaint that claims the prison's kosher menu lacked variety, that he was given insufficient time to eat and that on two separate dates he was deprived of a kosher meal on two dates.

Jacobs v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55662 (SD OH, June 30, 2009), was a RICO lawsuit filed by a number of prisoners against various state officials. Among the claims was a contention by one of the plaintiffs that his religious materials, including his copy of the Qu'ran, were vandalized by the "Men in Black" during a "shakedown." An Ohio federal magistrate judge recommended that the claim be rejected because none of the named defendants were alleged to have been involved in the incident.

In Pittman v. Broadus, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55350 (SD MS, June 15, 2009), plaintiff alleged some 18 different violations of his civil rights by jail officials. One of the claims that a Mississippi federal magistrate judge permitted to move ahead was plaintiff's claim that his free exercise rights were violated by the jail's failure to provide Islamic religious services or alternatively allow inmate-led services. However the court rejected the claim insofar as it alleged that the failure to provide services prevented non-Muslim inmates an opportunity to learn about Islam.

In Bey v. Douglas County Correctional Facility, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55748 (D KA, Jan. 27, 2009), a Kansas federal district court held that a delay in responding to an inmate's request for a kosher diet did not violate his free exercise rights under the 1st Amendment or RLUIPA. The inmate was a member of the Moorish Scientific Temple of America. At least the initial part of the delay resulted from officials researching the legitimacy of plaintiff's request. Subsequently the parties disagreed for a period of time over whether the meals met the proper standards for kosher food.

In Castle v. Schriro, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55843 (D AZ, June 30, 2009), an Arizona federal district court accepted a federal magistrate's recommendations and rejected a habeas corpus petition by a prisoner who challenged his sentence on Establishment Clause grounds, among others. In considering the aggravating factors at the sentencing hearing, the state trial court had mentioned the fact that the defendant used his purported Christan beliefs to deceive victims in his real estate fraud.

10th Circuit Rejects Parents' Claim of Religious Bias In Child Neglect Proceeding

In Starkey v. Boulder County Social Services, (10th Cir., June 29, 2009), the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected claims by parents that their free exercise and substantive due process rights were violated when Boulder County, Colorado child welfare officials placed their 3 children in foster care. Plaintiffs claimed in part that the children were removed because officials disapproved of the parents' fundamentalist Pentecostal religious beliefs. The court concluded that there was little in the record to support a contention of religious bias. What was there referred hospitalization of one of the children who suffered a days-long anxiety attack after undergoing a "spiritual cleansing."

Court Rejects Street Preacher's Suit Against Police

In Decker v. City of Athens, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55348 (ED TN, June 29, 2009), a Tennessee federal district court dismissed a street preacher's 1st Amendment claims against the city of Athens, Tennessee and two of its police officers. Police officers insisted that James Decker and his daughter, who were preaching and displaying signs, move back from the curb to continue. An argument broke out that escalated into police eventually using pepper spray on Decker. Rejecting plaintiff's free exercise claim, the court concluded that the officers were applying a neutral, generally applicable regulation prohibiting interference with traffic. It rejected plaintiff's free speech claim, finding that the regulation was a content-neutral time, place and manner restriction.

Newspaper Examines Workings Of British Sharia Courts

Today's London Daily Mail carries a long article on the workings of Britain's Islamic Sharia Council. This is the first time that a newspaper has been granted access to observe the full sharia legal process in Britain. The article says in part:

Sharia has been operating here, in parallel to the British legal system, since 1982. Work includes issuing fatwas - religious rulings on matters ranging from why Islam considers homosexuality a sin to why two women are equivalent to one male witness in an Islamic court. The Islamic Sharia Council also rules on individual cases, primarily in matters of Muslim personal or civil law: divorce, marriage, inheritance and settlement of dowry payments are the most common. However, in the course of my investigation, I discovered how sharia is being used informally within the Muslim community to tackle crime such as gang fights or stabbings, bypassing police and the British court system.