Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Ladner v. Hull, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118269 (ED VA, Sept. 3, 2015), a Virginia federal district court dismissed a Born-Again Christian inmate's complaint that there were not church services or Bible study sessions available to him. It found that a faith representative was available, and that plaintiff could file requests for other religious needs.

In Cooper v. Sowers, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118181 (D MD, Sept. 4, 2015), a Maryland federal district court dismissed a Catholic inmate's complaint that he was not provided a meatless diet on Ash Wednesday and on Fridays during Lent. Prison policy provides no special meal adjustments for those days and leaves it up to each inmate to decide what food to abstain from.

In Mootry v. Flores, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118632 (ED CA, Sept. 4, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was denied Jumu'ah prayer services because of a policy barring inmate ministers from leading inmate religious services without a supervising chaplain or volunteer.

In Sherman v. Jess, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119282 (ED WI, Sept. 8, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed a complaint by a Pagan Wiccan inmate that he did not get his religious text, Book of Shadows, while in temporary lockup.

In Mitchell v. Cate, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120059 (ED CA, Sept. 8, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a Christian inmate's complaint that he was not allowed to participate in religious activities or speak to a religious adviser during the time he was subject to a restricted modified program.

In Applegate v. Kokor, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120107 (ED CA, Sept. 8, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend a 252-page complaint alleging "various religious claims against eight Defendants," saying "it is neither time-efficient nor fair to other litigants for the Court to hunt through Plaintiff's Complaint for camouflaged cognizable claims."

In Robinson v. Cate, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120870 (ED CA, Sept. 9, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended that a Muslim inmate be permitted to move ahead with free exercise and equal protection claims for injunctive relief on his complaint that the Religious Meat Alternate Program fails to provide a fully Halal diet that is comparable to the fully Kosher diet provided to Jewish inmates.

In Moon v. Unterreiner, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121171 (ED MO, Sept. 11, 2015), a Missouri federal district court dismissed on various procedural grounds a suit by an inmate held under home confinement with electronic monitoring who claimed that his free exercise rights are infringed by requiring him to state the times he is going to and leaving his mosque for prayer.

Australian Court Awards Damages For Sexual Abuse By Headmistress of Jewish School

In Erlich v. Leifer, (SC Victoria, Sept. 16, 2015), a trial court in the Australian state of Victoria awarded compensatory and exemplary damages to Hadassa Sara Erlich who as a student in an ultra-Orthodox school was sexually abused by the school headmistress Malka Leifer,  The court found that the school directly and vicariously liable for the psychological injuries to Erlich. In an 82-page opinion, the court described Leifer's unusual position of power over students.  The Melbourne Herald Sun reports on the decision.

EEOC Sues Health Care System For Denying Religious Accommodation

The EEOC announced that it filed suit yesterday against the Minnesota-based North Memorial Health Care for withdrawing a job offer to a Seventh Day Adventist nurse after she requested an accommodation for religious practices.The federal court lawsuit seeks damages for nurse Emily Sure-Ondara, as well as an injunction barring retaliation against employees or job applicants who request religious accommodations.

Denial of Use Permit Did Not Violate RLUIPA

In Livingston Christian Schools v. Genoa Charter Township, (ED MI, Sept. 15, 2015), a Michigan federal district court denied a temporary restraining order to a Christian school that wants to move to property owned by the Brighton Church of the Nazarene.  The township board denied the Church's application to amend its special use permit to allow the school to operate on the property because of objections from neighbors about traffic and non-compliance with the current special use permit. The school claims this violate its rights under RLUIPA.  The court held that the school had not shown a likelihood of success on that claim:

LCS cannot meet its burden in establishing that the denial has more than a minimal impact on its free exercise of religion. The township’s denial of the church’s special use permit does not preclude either the church ... or LCS from freely exercising their religious tenets. The church is free to continue its normal operations pursuant to its existing special use permit. Similarly, LCS is free to continue operating as a religious school, and it has a building in Pinckney that it owns and has been using as the location for its school for the past nine years. Moreover, LCS recently found a second location from which it can operate. The fact that LCS has “ready alternatives” more than sufficient to meet its religious needs despite the township’s denial makes it unlikely that it has suffered a substantial burden on its free exercise of religion.

Abuse Victims Will Press Pope For More Accountability

In an article posted yesterday, the New York Times reports that when Pope Francis visits the United States later this month, survivors of clergy sexual abuse will be pressing him to do more to deal with abusers:

Advocates and victims say that while the church has improved in preventing abuse, it is still resisting full accountability. It blocks efforts to overhaul statute of limitations laws that protect many priests from prosecution and the church from lawsuits that could lead to more payouts to victims, they say. Outside the United States, the church still does not require those who face accusations of abuse to be removed from active ministry. And the Vatican has never explicitly punished a bishop for shielding accused priests, instead quietly accepting a few resignations....

He could also direct archdioceses to release the names of credibly accused American priests, at least 2,400 of whom have never been identified, said Terence McKiernan, the president of BishopAccountability.org,

Canadian Appeals Court Invalidates Niqab Ban At Citizenship Ceremonies

In Canada yesterday the Federal Court of Appeal in a rapid ruling from the bench following a half-day hearing held that the government's guideline banning the wearing of the niqab when taking the citizenship oath at naturalization ceremonies is invalid. According to the National Post, the judges moved quickly so that Zunera Ishaq could obtain her citizenship in time to vote in the October 19 federal election. The appeals court affirmed a lower court's ruling (see prior posting) that the policy against face coverings violates the government's own citizenship regulations. At the appeals court hearing, a Justice Department lawyer conceded that the face covering policy is not mandatory because a mandatory policy cannot be imposed through a mere guideline.

Arizona City Adopts Christian-Only Invocation Policy

At its September 14 meeting, the Coolidge, Arizona City Council had before it a resolution (full text) to open each Council meeting with a prayer.  The resolution was drafted to comply with the Supreme Court's Town of Greece guidelines.  However, according to the Coolidge Examiner, in passing the resolution, Council by a 4-2 vote also adopted an amendment offered by Councilman Rob Hudelson to limit invocations to Christian prayers.  The paper reports:

Speaking last was Hudelson, who himself is a preacher. He made clear his views that the United States is a Christian nation.

“I think it’s very important,” Hudelson said. “We just proclaimed Constitution Week. You know what was said at the end of the [Revolutionary] war? A treaty in Paris that said ‘In the name of the most holy and undivided trinity.’ You don’t get that from the Quran. You get it from the Bible. You get it from Christianity. That’s our heritage.”

After this, Hudelson motioned to accept the resolution with the stipulation that this be a Christian item

The City Attorney told Council that this amendment would violate the Establishment Clause, but nevertheless Council passed it.  The Resolution is subject to a 30-day review period, and the City Attorney will now rewrite it to comply with Council's amendment.

Challenge To Kaporos Ritual Fails

According to the New York Post, on Monday a New York state trial court judge ruled against activists challenging the Jewish pre-Yom Kippur ritual of kaporos, which involves use of a live chicken in a ceremony to symbolically atone for the past year's sins.  The chicken is then slaughtered and donated to the needy.  The lawsuit (see prior posting) claimed the practice violates various health and animal cruelty laws.  The court found that challengers had not shown that the ritual was a public nuisance, avoiding the need to rule on defendants' free exercise defenses.

Woman Sues NYPD Over Required Removal of Hijab For Mug Shot

Courthouse News Service and the New York Daily News report on a suit filed Monday in federal court in the Eastern District of New York against the New York Police Department by a Muslim woman forced to remove her hijab (head scarf)  before having her mug shot taken. Mervat Soliman, a 53-year old Egyptian woman,was arrested after a fight with her neighbor over a parking space. Alleging various disrespectful incidents during questioning, when Soliman objected to removing her hijab, police allegedly said: "This is America, we don't care."

Update on Kim Davis and Marriage Licenses In Kentucky

On Monday, Rowan County, Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis, after spending 5 days in jail on contempt charges, returned to work still opposed on religious grounds to issuing marriage licences to same-sex couples.  However, as reported by CNN, she did not prevent her deputy clerks from issuing licences reading that they were issued "pursuant to federal court order." Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear said that the state will recognize these licenses as valid.  Meanwhile, yesterday in Davis v. Beshear, (6th Cir., Sept. 15, 2015), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals denied Davis request for a preliminary injunction against the Governor and the Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Libraries and Archives seeking to prevent them from enforcing the district court order that county clerks issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and exempting her from issuing licenses pending appeal of the district court's delay in passing on her request for an injunction. (See prior related posting.) The court said in part:

Davis maintains that the issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples burdens her sincerely held religious beliefs in violation of the U.S. Constitution, the Kentucky Constitution, and the Kentucky Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Davis has not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on her federal constitutional claims. We need not address the merits of her claims under Kentucky law because the Eleventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution precludes the federal courts from compelling state officials to comply with state law.

Crane Collapse Kills 107 At Mecca's Grand Mosque As Hajj Approaches

According to CNN, yesterday in Mecca, ten days before the beginning of the Hajj, a powerful storm caused a construction crane to collapse through the roof of the Grand Mosque, killing 107 and injuring 238 others. The Mosque surrounds the Kaaba, the holiest site in Islam.  The Mosque is being expanded to better handle the large number of visitors that make the Hajj pilgrimage each year.

Court Issues Interim $43.7M Judgment Against Russia In Fight Over Return of Jewish Library

In Agadus Chasidei Chabad of United States v. Russian Federation, (D DC,Sept. 10, 2015), the D.C. federal district court entered an interim judgment for accrued sanctions totaling $43.7 million against the Russian Federation, the Russian Ministry of Culture and Mass Communication, and the Russian State Military Archive.  It went on to hold that plaintiffs may petition the clerk every 90 days for an additional judgment until defendants comply with a 2010 order of the court.

The sanctions grow out of a ten-year effort by Chabad to regain possession of two expropriated collections of religious books held by the Russian government. After losing its jurisdictional arguments, the Russian government refused to participate in the litigation and in 2010 a default judgment was entered against it. The court then imposed civil sanctions of $50,000 per day until defendants comply with the court's order. (See prior posting.)  The United States government argued against the court granting the current interim judgment, claiming that this will further damage U.S. foreign policy interests including efforts to reach a settlement with defendants on plaintiffs' behalf. The court disagreed saying generally:

Given the United States' current sanctions against Russia and Russian interests based upon various geopolitical events, the Court is unpersuaded by such a vague concern in this case.

The court also pointed out that this is not an enforcement action. Enforcement issues will arise only when plaintiff identifies property in the United States to attach.

Reporting on the decision, the Legal Times quotes plaintiffs' lawyer who says this decision will permit plaintiffs to register a judgment in other states and look for assets to attach. He said Chabad will not go after Russian art or cultural objects on loan to U.S. museums. Meanwhile, as previously reported, in a split with Chabad in the U.S., the Russian branch of Chabad supports the Russian government's compromise arrangement which involves digitizing one of the collections and moving it to Moscow's new Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.

Counter-Letter Urges Obama To Retain 2007 Office of Legal Counsel Interpretation of RFRA

As previously reported, last month a coalition of 130 religious, civil rights and advocacy organizations sent a letter to the President urging that the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel reconsider a 2007 Memorandum that interpreted RFRA to require exemptions for religiously-affiliated organizations from non-discrimination provisions in federal grant programs. Now a counter-letter dated Sept. 10 and signed by 70 religious leaders and faculty at religiously-affiliated colleges (full text) has been sent to the President urging him to retain "basic principles and provisions of federal law that support religious staffing by religious organizations." The letter reads in part:

We are grateful that you have welcomed “all hands” to contribute to federal social policy by maintaining and refining the federal faith-based initiative and its rules that provide for equal opportunity for faith-based organizations to collaborate with government in serving community needs. Making it more difficult for faith-based organizations to join those partnerships would undermine, rather than burnish, your commitment to effective and flourishing “all hands” partnerships.

Mirror of Justice reports on the letter.

Obama Holds Conference Call With U.S. Rabbis In Advance of Rosh Hashanah

A White House press release reports that yesterday President Obama held a conference call with over 500 U.S. rabbis from the four major Jewish religious denominations to mark Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, which begins at sundown on Sunday. According to the readout of the President's call:

In addition to wishing the Rabbis and their congregations a happy, healthy new year, the President discussed and answered participants' questions on a range of topics, including the nuclear deal among the P5+1, the EU, and Iran that will verifiably prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. 

Second Suit Filed Challenging Nevada's School Voucher Law

This week a second state court lawsuit challenging Nevada's broad school voucher program was filed. The complaint (full text) in Lopez v. Schwartz, (NV Dist. Ct., filed 9/10/2015), claims that the challenged statute violates the Education Article (Art. XI) of the Nevada Constitution. The suit alleges that the new law diverts funds appropriated for uniform public schools to non-uniform private ones,  A press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit said that it complements the one filed last month by the ACLU (see prior posting) by raising a separate and independent basis for invalidating the law.

New York City Repeals Circumcision Informed Consent Rule

As reported by the New York Times, on Wednesday the New York City Board of Health by a vote of 9-1-1 repealed its largely unenforced regulations that required parental consent forms be signed in cases of ritual circumcision using the direct oral suction technique (metzitzah b'peh). The original regulations were adopted in 2012 in order to prevent passage of the herpes simplex virus to infants. (See prior posting.)  In its Notice of Adoption the Board said in part:

In February, 2015, the Mayor announced a new strategy to address this problem. As part of this approach, the Department will work cooperatively with leaders of the Orthodox Jewish community to educate parents about the risks of DOS. These educational efforts will include working with hospitals throughout the City to distribute educational materials about the risks of DOS to the parents of all newborn infant boys, as well as making this information available at other health care settings, such as obstetric and pediatric practices. These materials, which include a Department telephone number for parents who may have questions, have been translated into Yiddish and are being distributed at hospitals and medical offices that service communities where DOS is practiced. The Department’s educational initiative is more likely to succeed if the Department can restore a strong relationship with these communities.

City officials expect Orthodox Jewish leaders to cooperate in banning mohels  who are found to have infected an infant, though formal arrangements with them are not yet complete. (See prior related posting.) [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Guilty Pleas In Indictment For Exporting Meat Falsely Labeled As Halal

According to the Des Moines Register, yesterday Midamar Corp. and Islamic Services of America each pleaded guilty in federal court in Iowa to one count of conspiracy to make false statements on export certificates, sell misbranded meat and commit wire fraud in the export to Malaysia and Indonesia of beef products purporting to be Halal. Each company will forfeit $600,000 in profits and may face probation and additional fines at sentencing. The related companies and their principals were indicted last year. (See prior posting.) Midamar’s founder, Bill Aossey Jr., was convicted earlier this summer of falsifying documents, while Aossey’s two sons who are directors of Midamar will enter guilty pleas on Friday. (See prior related posting.)

Oregon Judge Faces Ethics Charges Over Refusing Same-Sex Weddings and Other Matters

The Oregon Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability announced in a press release issued Tuesday that a hearing is scheduled next month on ethics charges filed against Marion County Judge Vance Day.  (See prior related posting.) Day has religious objections to same-sex marriage, and one of the charges against him is that before he decided to discontinue entirely performing wedding ceremonies, he had his staff screen wedding applicants to assure that he was not presiding over a same-sex marriage.  However Day, who is head of the Veterans Treatment Court, also faces five other unrelated charges including false statements, improperly allowing a veteran with a prior felony conviction to handle firearms and posting a picture of Adolph Hitler in the county courthouse.  According to CBS News, the Hitler portrait was part of a collage included in memorabilia of a local doctor who had served in World War II. The portrait was surrounded and partially obscured by pages from the doctor's diary, medals and photos.

Meanwhile, The Oregonian reported yesterday that another Oregon state trial court judge, Washington County Judge Thomas Kohl, has also stopped performing weddings now that same-sex marriages are legal.  Kohl has written and speaks widely in churches and prisons about the transformative power of faith.

Fayetteville Voters Approve Controversial Anti-Discrimination Law

In Fayetteville, Arkansas on Tuesday voters approved the city's controversial Uniform Civil Rights Protection Ordinance.  According to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, complete unofficial returns show 7,666 votes for and 6,860 against the Ordinance that bars discrimination in employment, public accommodations, real estate, contracts and voting on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Opponents, many of whom object that the religious exemptions in the ordinance are too narrow, have filed suit challenging the legality of the Ordinance. They claim it violates free exercise and free speech rights as well as Arkansas' recently enacted Intrastate Commerce Improvement Act that prohibits counties, municipalities and other political subdivisions from expanding civil rights protections beyond those found in state law. (See prior posting.)

Suit Challenges Kapparot Ceremonies Under California's Unfair Competition Law

In Los Angeles a group of animal rights activists have filed a state court lawsuit seeking to stop public kapparot ceremonies.  The Jewish Journal reports on the lawsuit, filed August 26,  challenging the pre-Yom Kippur ceremony which uses live chickens that are subsequently slaughtered.  Apparently, at least in previous years, in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood kapparot has been promoted with booths set up in parking lots, large banners and barkers in chicken costumes. Some say that the anti-kapparot protests in the Pico-Robertson area of Los Angeles have now driven the practice underground.

The lawsuit contends that the practice violates California's Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code Sec. 17200- 17210). The law's definition of unfair competition includes "any unlawful ... business act or practice."  A suit for an injunction and damages may be brought by "a person who has suffered injury in fact and has lost money or property as a result of the unfair competition."  The complaint, filed on behalf of seven plaintiffs, claims that in transporting, storing, and slaughtering the chickens, and later disposing of their blood and fecal matter, the six synagogues and five individuals named as defendants violate an average of eleven laws. Plaintiffs claim interesting losses to give them standing: expenses for travel to kapparot protests, time lost from work as a result of attending the protests and the cost of printing leaflets. One plaintiff claimed veterinarian bills for two chickens she rescued from one of the synagogues named as a defendant.