Ohio Stay-At-Home Order Exempts Religious Gatherings

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine yesterday announced a statewide stay-at-home order designed to limit the spread of the coronavirus. The Order (full text) requires all persons to stay at home unless engaged in "essential" work, activity or travel. Among the list of essential operations that may continue is:

Religious facilities, entities and groups and religious gatherings, including weddings and funerals.

The Order takes effect at 11:59 pm today.  Business Insider reports on the governor's action.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Helen M. Alvare, Beyond Moralism: A Critique and a Proposal for Catholic Institutional Religious Freedom, (Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2019).
• Terri Day, Revisiting Masterpiece Cakeshop -- Free Speech and the First Amendment: Can Political Correctness Be Compelled?, (Hofstra Law Review, Volume 48 (Forthcoming)).
• Joao Pedro Padua, Discursive Devices for Inserting Morality Into Law: Initial Exploration From the Analysis of a Brazilian Supreme Court Decision, (Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito, Vol. 6(1), 2019, p. 11-29).
• Shamshad Pasarlay, Shīʿī Constitutionalism in Afghanistan: A Tale of Two Draft Constitutions, (Australian Journal of Asian Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, Article 1, 2020).
• Greer Donley, Parental Autonomy over Prenatal End-of-Life Decisions, (Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 105, Forthcoming).

From SmartCILP:

• Jonathan J. Kim & Eugene Temchenko, Constitutional Intolerance to Religious Gerrymandering, 18 Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal 1-57 (2019).
• L. Darnell Weeden, Using Rational Basis Review in an Establishment Clause Challenge to an Alleged Muslim Travel Ban Undermines Religious Liberty, 18 Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal 165-186 (2019).

Michigan Houses of Worship Exempted From Penalties For Violating COVID-19 Executive Order

On March 17, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer issued Executive Order 2020-11 (COVID-19) which banned assemblages of more than 50 people in a single indoor shared space, with limited exceptions. None of the exceptions related to houses of worship.  However is an FAQs posting later in the week, the state said that while places of worship are covered, they are exempt from the penalty provisions that make willful violations of the ban a misdemeanor.  Detroit Free Press reports on the developments.

Texas Judge Sues Over Right To Oppose Same-Sex Marriage

A county judge in Jack County, Texas has filed suit in a Texas federal district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent any future enforcement action by the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct against him. The complaint (full text) in Umphress v. Hall, (ND TX, filed 3/18/2020) alleges in part:

A few months ago, the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct issued a “public warning” to Dianne Hensley, a justice of the peace who recuses herself from officiating at same-sex marriage ceremonies on account of her Christian faith....  The Commission’s interpretation of Canon 4A(1) threatens every judge in Texas who refuses to perform same-sex marriages, as well as those who publicly evince disapproval of same-sex marriage or homosexual conduct in their extra-judicial activities.....

The Court should therefore declare that the First Amendment protects Judge Umphress’s right to conduct his extra-judicial activities in a manner that evinces disapproval of same-sex marriage and homosexual conduct.

Pink News reports on the lawsuit.

Police Had Cause To Search Residence of Catholic Religious Order Member

In State of Connecticut v. Sawyer, (CT Sup. Ct., March 19, 2020), the Connecticut Supreme Court held that the search warrant that led to the arrest of a member of a Catholic religious order for possessing child pornography was properly issued.  The court held that authorities had probable cause to search the residence of defendant, a member of The Brothers of Holy Cross, living with two other brothers in an apartment they rented from a West Haven Catholic church. Police acted on a report by one of defendant's roommates. AP reports on the decision.

New Hampshire Governor Sued Over Ban On Large Gatherings

One News Now reports that a lawsuit was filed yesterday in a New Hampshire state trial court challenging the Governor's COVID19- inspired emergency ban on gatherings of 50 or more people. The three plaintiffs argue that there is no emergency and that the ban violates their constitutional rights. Among the gatherings that plaintiffs wish to visit are religious services and Sunday school at a Baptist church. The court refused to issue an immediate temporary restraining order and scheduled a hearing for Friday.

HHS Sued Over Non-Enforcement of LGBTQ Anti-Discrimination Rules

As previously reported, last November the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced actions that effectively allow agencies receiving HHS grants to refuse to serve gay, lesbian and transgender individuals and families on religious grounds. First, HHS issued a Notice of Non-Enforcement of  rules adopted in 2016 that prohibit such discrimination. HHS then issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would repromulgate the rules with narrower anti-discrimination protections. Yesterday, a lawsuit was filed in a New York federal district court challenging the legality of the Notice of Non-Enforcement.

The complaint (full text) in Family Equality v. Azar, (SD NY, filed 3/19/2020) contends that the Notice of Non-Enforcement violates the Administrative Procedure Actin three ways. It was promulgated without notice-and-comment rule making. It was based on a mistaken determination that the 2016 original non-discrimination rule did not comply with the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. HHS failed to consider alternative remedies, the costs and benefits of their decision, and the public interest.  Lambda Legal issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit, saying in part:

As the coronavirus pandemic continues to spread rapidly throughout the U.S., LGBTQ individuals of all ages are left vulnerable by the Trump administration’s illegal action, which implicitly permits discrimination when providing critical services.

Maine Voters Refuse To Repeal Strengthened Vaccination Requirements

As reported by BJC, on Super Tuesday earlier this month, voters in Maine, by a 3-1 margin, rejected an attempt to repeal Maine's new stronger immunization law. The law removes the prior exemption for religious and philosophical objections to vaccination. The law goes into effect in September 2021.

USCIRF Fact Sheet On COVID-19's Impact on Religious Freedom

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom has issued a new Fact Sheet titled: The Global Response to the Coronavirus: Impact on Religious Practice and Religious Freedom.

Maryland Amends Hate Crime Law

The Maryland General Assembly this week gave final passage to an amended hate crime law, making it easier to convict. The bill-- SB606/ HB917 (full text)-- defines a hate crime as one "motivated  in whole or in substantial part" by a person's race, color, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, disability, or national origin, or because another person or group is homeless. Previously the law required the crime be committed "because of" such characteristics. WTOP News reports on the legislature's action.                   

White House Briefs New York's Orthodox Rabbis On COVID-19 Precautions

Jerusalem Post and Jewish Insider report that the White House yesterday held a conference call with 15 leading Orthodox rabbis in the New York area to encourage them to follow the White House guidelines designed to prevent the further spread of COVID-19. The call was conducted by Avi Berkowitz, an Orthodox Jew who is an assistant to the President. More than 100 people have tested positive for the coronavirus in New York's Orthodox Jewish Borough Park neighborhood. After the call, the Satmar Rebbe, Rabbi Aaron Teitelbaum, ordered all synagogues and Jewish schools in the largely Hasidic village of Kiryas Joel to close.

9th Circuit: Religious References At Sentencing Hearing Were OK

In United States v. Hong, (9th Cir., March 17, 2020), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that a district court did not violate defendants' free exercise rights at a sentencing hearing in a fraud case, saying in part:

The district court did not plainly err in describing how the Hongs used religion to carry out their fraudulent scheme, in commenting on video footage showing Grace Hong speaking to a church group, or in mentioning the spiritual harm suffered by the Hongs’ victims. The Hongs point to no binding legal authority precluding a sentencing court from considering the religion of the victims or noting the spiritual impact of an offense on the victims. 

Judge May No Deduct Litigation Expenses Borne By His Legal Defense Fund

As previously reported, in 2018 the Oregon Supreme Court suspended state circuit court judge Vance D. Day from his judicial office for three years without pay. The suspension was based in part on Judge Day's refusal to solemnize same-sex marriages.  Now in Vance v. Department of Revenue, (OR Tax Ct., March 13, 2020), the Oregon Tax Court held that Day improperly claimed as a deduction on his state income tax $128,000 in legal fees paid on his behalf by his legal defense fund.

Supreme Court Postpones Oral Arguments For Public Health Reasons

The U.S. Supreme Court announced yesterday that it is postponing oral arguments currently scheduled for it March session because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Included in the cases postponed are Tanzin v. Tanvir (availability of money damages under RFRA) and the consolidated arguments in two cases involving the scope of the Ministerial Exception doctrine (Our Lady of Guadalupe v. Morrissey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel). The Court's press release added:

The Court’s postponement of argument sessions in light of public health concerns is not unprecedented.  The Court postponed scheduled arguments for October 1918 in response to the Spanish flu epidemic.  The Court also shortened its argument calendars in August 1793 and August 1798 in response to yellow fever outbreaks.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Itamar Mann, Zionism and Human Rights, (International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 17 issue 4 (October, 2019)).
• Ram Rivlin, Family Law and Religion in Israel, (March 9, 2020).
• Barbara E. Armacost, Celebrating Robert Cochran and the Future of "Embodied" Christian Legal Scholarship, (Pepperdine Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Amy J. Sepinwall, Conscience in Commerce, (February 19, 2020).
• Emad H. Atiq, Review of 'Natural Law and the Nature of Law,' by Jonathan Crowe, (Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2020).
• Daniel Peterson, Case Note: Constitutional Court Decision No 93/PUU-X/2012 on Shari’a Banking Dispute Resolution, (Australian Journal of Asian Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, Article 7, 2020).
• Natalie Silver, When Charity No Longer Begins and Ends at Home: The Australian Government's Regulatory Response to Charities Operating Overseas,  (Adelaide Law Review, 40:3, 2019, pp. 755-782).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:

• Sarah A. Morgan Smith, Commonwealth As Civic Communion, [Abstract], 57 University of Louisville Law Review 467-500 (2019).
• Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 34, Issue 3 (Dec. 2019) has recently appeared.

6th Circuit Upholds Company's Religious Accommodation For Jehovah's Witness

In Small v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water, (6th Cir., March 12, 2020), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of an employment discrimination claim by a Jehovah's Witness. The court concluded that Memphis Light adequately accommodated their employee's religious beliefs when it allowed him to swap shifts with other employees. Judge Thapar filed a concurring opinion, criticizing the Supreme court's Hardison decision.

DOJ Gives Its Lawyers A Training Week On Religious Liberty

The New York Times reports today:

The Justice Department this week hosted training for its lawyers on religious liberty laws as part of Attorney General William P. Barr’s push to prioritize religious freedom cases, but the workshops prompted concern among some career lawyers that they were being educated on ways to blunt civil rights protections for gay and transgender people....

The training week was part of an ongoing campaign at the department to bolster ​its work to​ protect religious freedom, which is regularly described by top leaders as the first right protected by the First Amendment​, a department official said in response to a request for comment. ...

 A department spokesman said that the trainings were in no way meant to marginalize gay, lesbian and transgender people or to promote discrimination in any way, and that nothing in the materials presented did so.

Vanita Gupta, the president of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the former head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, accused Mr. Barr of using the Justice Department to promote his religious beliefs.

“In speeches and statements, he says that civil society is being undermined by a move away from religiosity,” she said. “He wants to use civil rights statutes and the D.O.J. to redeem what he views as the corrupted soul of America.”

President Calls For Day of Prayer For Protection and Strength

In a Tweet issued yesterday President Donald Trump said:

It is my great honor to declare Sunday March 15 as a National Day of Prayer. We are a Country that, throughout our history, looked to God for protection and strength in times like these. No matter where you may be, I encourage you to turn towards prayer in an act of faith. Together we will easily PREVAIL!

However, no formal Presidential Proclamation on the day of prayer appears on the White House website. Fox News reports on the President's statement.

New Website On Law, Religion and COVID-19

A new website-- Religion, Law and COVID-19 Emergency has been created by a group of faculty at the University of Bari (Italy). Here is their description of the coverage they seek to include:

The health emergency caused by the contagious virus Covid-19 is having many consequences also on religious rules – more broadly for the difficulties raising from the possible contradiction between the respect for the measures taken by civil authorities and religious rules. International law allows for the limitation˝ of the right to religious freedom on the grounds of protection of public health, and we are witnessing a situation of unprecedented restrictions on the global scale. As scholars engaged in the study of the legal regulation of the religious phenomenon, we have wanted to create a space to collect documents, comments and other useful materials related to the emergency, in order to assess the outcomes of the normative choices made by civil and religious authorities.

Some Louisville Religious Leaders Question Governor's Call For Halt To Services To Combat Coronavirus

In order to slow the spread of COVID-19, officials in various parts of the United States, as well as in a number of other countries, have encouraged or required cancellation of gatherings of large numbers of persons.  These have often specifically included a call for cancellation of religious services.  For the most part, churches and synagogues have cooperated with these government requests. However, the reaction yesterday of some religious leaders in Louisville, Kentucky to a request (full text) by Governor Andy Beshear raises in a new context a possible clash between government mandated health measures and religious rights.  The Louisville Courier Journal reports:

... [T]he request has caused confusion for congregations citywide, with some seeing it as an affront to their religions.

"Places that at one time seemed safe and sacred are now being called out as viral threats," the Interdenominational Ministerial Coalition said in a statement Wednesday. "The sanctity of church is needed during this uncertain time."....

The Rev. Stephen Smith adamantly said Portland Memorial Missionary Baptist Church will not cancel services for its 800 members. "You're not closing grocery stores, you're not closing gas stations, so no — we're not closing anything," Smith said.... 

"If we tried to shut the [Lenten] fish fry down we'd have a protest in the street," Smith said. "These people are going to come and get their fish; they're not thinking about a virus."...

... [T]he Archdiocese of Louisville.... issued a statement saying that it would not call for a cancellation of daily or weekend Masses.

"The Sunday celebration of the Eucharist is at the center of the life of the Church," the statement read. "Perhaps especially in difficult times, liturgical gatherings are a source of comfort and hope for the faithful, as well as an opportunity to offer our prayers to God for those who are suffering or who cannot be with us."

"At the same time, it is important – especially for those who are ill, feel vulnerable, or feel afraid – to be able to exercise individual discretion in light of this situation."