Chapter 121 of the Wisconsin Statutes requires school districts ... to provide and fund transportation services to both public and private-school students in their boundaries, with “reasonable uniformity” in the transportation offered.... [T]he District provides busing to its own students that drops them off reasonably before the start of their school day. Yet, despite its plain statutory obligations, the District has adamantly refused to provide similar busing for the upcoming 2020–21 term to the students of St. Maria Goretti School.... Instead, the District has repeatedly informed St. Maria Goretti that it would only provide and fund busing that drops off its students 70 minutes after its current start time. So, the District is forcing St. Maria Goretti to substantially change its start and end times to receive busing, devastating almost every aspect of the school, including its Catholic mission; or to accept manifestly inadequate services that drops off its students well after the beginning of the school day; or to pay for busing services itself, despite the substantial burdens this would impose. This unequal, unjust treatment violates Chapter 121.The school also filed a 47-page brief (full text) in support of its motion for a temporary injunction or writ of mandamus.
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Showing posts with label School aid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label School aid. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 20, 2020
Catholic School Sues For More Adequate State Bus Transportation
On Friday, a pre-K through 8th grade Catholic school in Madison, Wisconsin announced that it has filed suit against the Madison, Wisconsin Metropolitan School District to obtain state-funded bus transportation that meets its current class starting time. The complaint (full text) in St. Maria Goretti Congregation v. Madison Metropolitan School District, (WI Cir. Ct., filed 5/15/2020), alleges in part:
Labels:
Catholic schools,
School aid,
Wisconsin
Friday, April 17, 2020
Litigation Delay Refused In Suit Over Christian School's Compliance With Nondiscrimination Requirements
In Bethel Ministries, Inc. v. Salmon, (D MD, April 15, 2020), a Maryland federal district court refused to stay discover in a suit by a Christian school challenging its disqualification from Maryland's scholarship program for non-public schools. Bethel Christian Academy was denied funds because of its failure to comply with non-discrimination requirements which include a ban on discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Maryland school officials had sought a stay because of the U.S. Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In refusing a stay, the district court said in part:
[T]he Supreme Court’s decision in Fulton might provide useful guidance for this Court’s resolution of Bethel’s claims. Even so, this Court is disinclined to stay proceedings because of a theoretical possibility....
By the nature of the claims presented in this case, a delay of more than a year would have a significant effect on Bethel’s enrollment, and its ability to budget for the academic year. Irrespective of the ultimate result of this matter, Bethel and Defendants would be better served by entering the 2020-2021 school year with this litigation moving closer to a definitive conclusion.
Labels:
LGBT rights,
Maryland,
School aid
Saturday, January 25, 2020
President Proclaims National School Choice Week
Yesterday President Trump issued a Presidential Proclamation (full text) declaring January 26 to February 1 as National School Choice Week. His Proclamation says in part:
Each child is a gift from God who has boundless potential and deserves a fair shot at the American Dream. To have that fair shot, children and their families must be free to pursue an educational environment that matches their individual learning style, develops their unique talents, and prepares them with the knowledge and character needed for fulfilling and productive lives.....
Today, I renew my call on the Congress to focus on what is best for children and pass a Federal tax credit to support State-based educational choice programs.....
Labels:
Donald Trump,
Internal Revenue Code,
School aid
Thursday, January 23, 2020
Christian School Denied Injunction Against Anti-Discrimination Provisions In Aid Programs
In Bethel Ministries, Inc. v. Salmon, (D MD, Jan. 21, 2020), a Maryland federal district court refused to issue a preliminary injunction requested by a Christian elementary school. Bethel Christian Academy sought to enjoin enforcement of a provision requiring non-discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in order to participate in state-sponsored scholarship and school aid programs. The court concluded that the school had not shown that the state targeted, was hostile to, or expressly discriminated against the school because of its religious beliefs. Nor had the school shown a likelihood of success on its claim that its free speech rights were infringed.
Labels:
Discrimination in Education,
LGBT rights,
Maryland,
School aid
Wednesday, January 22, 2020
Supreme Court Will Hear Arguments Today In Montana Religious School Aid Case
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this morning in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. In the case, the Montana Supreme Court held that Montana's tax credit program for contributions to student scholarship organizations is unconstitutional under Montana Constitution Art. X, Sec, 6 which prohibits state aid to sectarian schools. (See prior posting.) The Solicitor General will participate in oral argument, contending that Montana's "no-aid" provision violates the U.S. Constitution's free exercise clause. SCOTUS blog has a preview of today's arguments. Here is SCOTUS blog's case page with links to all the filings in the case and to additional discussion of the issues involved. I will post the transcript of the oral arguments later today when it becomes available.
Labels:
Education Tax Credits,
Montana,
School aid,
US Supreme Court
Friday, May 10, 2019
Justice Department Supports Challenge To Vermont's Exclusion of Parochial Schools From College Program
Yesterday the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest (full text) in in A.M. v. French, (D VT, filed 5/9/2019). DOJ's filing supports the position of plaintiffs who are challenging the exclusion of religious private school students from Vermont's Dual Enrollment Program. Under the program, high school students may take up to two courses at public or private colleges at state expense. However while public and other private schools and home schooled students are eligible, private religious school students are not. DOJ argues that this discriminates against students' religious expression. DOJ also issued a press release explaining its action.
Labels:
Free exercise,
School aid
Monday, December 17, 2018
New Mexico Supreme Court Upholds Textbook Loan Program
In Moses v. Ruszkowski, (NM Sup. Ct., Dec. 13, 2018), the New Mexico Supreme Court in a 5-2 decision held that New Mexico's textbook loan program does not violate the state constitution. The program provides for the loan of secular textbooks to private and parochial school students. In 2015, the state Supreme Court held that the program was unconstitutional. (See prior posting.) However in 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's Trinity Lutheran Church decision. (See prior posting.) Now on remand, the state Supreme Court reversed itself, saying in part:
On remand, we conclude that this Court’s previous interpretation of Article 16 XII, Section 3 raises concerns under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. To avoid constitutional concerns, we hold that the textbook loan program, which provides a generally available public benefit to students, does not result in the use of public funds in support of private schools as prohibited by Article XII, Section 3. We also hold that the textbook loan program is consistent with Article IV, Section 31 of the New Mexico Constitution, which addresses appropriations for educational purposes, and Article IX, Section 14 of the New Mexico Constitution, which limits “any donation to or in aid of any person, association or public or private corporation.”Chief Justice Nakamura and Justice Clingman dissented. Courthouse News Service reports on the decision.
Labels:
High School Athletics,
New Mexico,
School aid,
Textbooks
Thursday, December 13, 2018
Montana Supreme Court Invalidates Tuition Tax Credit Program
In Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, (MT Sup. Ct., Dec. 12, 2018), the Montana Supreme Court in a 5-2 decision held that Montana's tax credit program for contributions to student scholarship organizations is unconstitutional under Montana Constitution Art. X, Sec, 6 which prohibits state aid to sectarian schools. The majority said in part:
Justice Gustafson filed a concurring opinion concluding that the tax credit program also violates the federal Free Exercise and Establishment clauses. Justice Sandefur joined this concurring opinion and also filed a separate concurrence.
Justice Baker, joined by Justice Rice dissented saying in part:
Montana’s no-aid provision is unique from other states’ no-aid provisions. Article X, Section 6’s prohibition of “any direct or indirect appropriation or payment from any public fund or monies, or any grant of lands or other property for any sectarian purpose or to aid any . . . school . . . controlled in whole or in part by any church” make it a broader and stronger prohibition against aid to sectarian schools than other states. Even other states whose no-aid provisions also contain “indirect” language only prohibit aid in the form of the direct or indirect taking of money from the public treasury.... Such language is distinct from and less stringent than Montana’s prohibition on any type of aid, whether it be a “direct or indirect appropriation or payment from any public fund or monies, or any grant of lands or other property.” Mont. Const. art. X, § 6(1).The majority also held that the Department of Revenue's attempt to cure the program's unconstitutionality by Rule was invalid because the Department exceeded its rule making authority. The court left the student scholarship organization provisions in force, but without the accompanying tax credit for contributions.
Justice Gustafson filed a concurring opinion concluding that the tax credit program also violates the federal Free Exercise and Establishment clauses. Justice Sandefur joined this concurring opinion and also filed a separate concurrence.
Justice Baker, joined by Justice Rice dissented saying in part:
The creation of the credit is a government’s determination not to collect tax revenues. The statute diverts the funds before they ever become public monies. This well may result in an indirect impact on the “public fund or monies,” but it is not an indirect payment,,,,
The Court today holds that a tax credit—granted to a private individual for a donation that may or may not be directed to a religious entity—violates the State Constitution, even though it is clear under the law that a direct tax exemption by the State to a church does not.Justice Rice also filed a separate dissent. The Missoulian reports on the decision,
Labels:
Education Tax Credits,
Montana,
School aid
Friday, October 12, 2018
7th Circuit Upholds Wisconsin's Limit on Busing Benefit To One School of Each Denomination In District
In St. Augustine School v. Evers, (7th Cir., Oct. 11, 2018), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1- decision, upheld Wisconsin's statue which requires school districts to bus private school students, but limits the obligation to only one private school affiliated with the same religious denomination or sponsoring group in each attendance district. St. Augustine school did not qualify for busing because another Catholic school in the district qualified first. The majority rejected free exercise and Establishment Clause challenges to the arrangement, saying in part:
The reason why St. Augustine cannot demand services within its desired attendance zone is not because it is a Catholic school; it is because—by its own choice—it professes to be affiliated with a group that already has a school in that zone. By the same token, Wisconsin is not denying the Forros a transit subsidy because they are Catholic or because they seek to send their children to Catholic school. It funds transportation for all of the Catholic families who send their children to St. Gabriel. The problem for St. Augustine is not that it is Catholic; it is that it is second in line.Judge Ripple dissented arguing that St. Augustine and St. Gabriel should not be seen as affiliated with the same denomination because St. Augustine is organizationally unaffiliated with the Catholic Archdiocese.
Labels:
Catholic,
Establishment Clause,
Free exercise,
School aid,
Wisconsin
Friday, August 24, 2018
Washington's Work-Study Program Challenged Over Non-Sectarian Employer Requirement
A suit was filed last week in federal district court in the state of Washington challenging Washington's structuring of its Work-Study program. The Program provides financial aid to college students by paying part of a student's salary when the student is working for a participating employer, usually in a field related to the student's studies. Eligible employers, and jobs themselves, must be non-sectarian. The complaint (full text) in Summit Christian Academy v. Meotti, (WD WA, filed 8/14/2018) contends that excluding religious employers and sectarian work violates the free exercise clause, the equal protection clause and the Establishment Clause. Institute for Justice issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit.
Friday, May 11, 2018
Education Department Considering Expanding Faith-Based Insitutions' Eligibility For Grants
As part of its Spring 2018 regulatory agenda released on Wednesday, the U.S. Department of Education signaled that it is considering rule amendments to expand the eligibility of faith-based institutions for federal grants. In a release titled Eligibility of Faith-Based Entities and Activities, DOE said:
Various provisions of the Department’s regulations regarding the eligibility of faith-based entities to obtain grants from the Department or to participate in State-administered programs and the activities that they may perform unnecessarily restrict participation by religious entities in the Department’s grant programs by including requirements specific to such entities. The Department plans to review and to amend or rescind such regulations in order to be consistent with current law and to reduce or eliminate unnecessary burdens and restrictions on religious entities and activities.According to the New York Times, the proposals are an attempt to align DOE rules regarding religious colleges and universities with the Supreme Court's 2017 Trinity Lutheran decision. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]
Labels:
Department of Education,
School aid
Saturday, March 10, 2018
Michigan Supreme Court Refuses To Reverse Injunction Against Private School Aid
In Council of Organizations and Others for Education About Parochiaid v. State of Michigan, (MI Sup. Ct., March 9, 2018), the Michigan Supreme Court in a brief order denied leave to appeal a preliminary injunction issued by the Court of Claims. That injunction prohibited payment of $2.5 million the legislature had allocated to private schools to cover the cost of complying with state mandates. (See prior posting.) Chief Justice Markham filed a dissenting opinion arguing that the decision of the Court of Claims should be reversed.
Labels:
Michigan,
School aid
Sunday, December 17, 2017
Final Tax Bill Extends 529 Plans To Elementary and Secondary School Tuition
The final version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as it emerged from the Conference Committee (full text) extends Section 529 Qualified Tuition Programs so that they will now be able to be used to fund not just higher education expenses, but also up to $10,000 per student per year of tuition at public, private or religious elementary or secondary schools.
Labels:
Internal Revenue Code,
School aid
Friday, November 03, 2017
New Tax Bill Would Allow "529 Plans" For Parochial School Tuition
The Republican tax bill (full text) introduced yesterday (see prior posting) would allow parents to set up "529 Plans" for up to $10,000 per year of elementary and secondary school tuition, including tuition at religious schools. (Section 1202). 529 Plans, currently limited to saving for college expenses, are a method of earning tax-free income on educational savings. The bill also allows a Section 529 plan to be set up for an "unborn child," defined in the proposal as a "child in utero," which is in turn defined in the bill as "a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."
Labels:
Internal Revenue Code,
School aid
Friday, July 28, 2017
Trinity Lutheran Decision Does Not Apply to Neutral Ban on Funds to Private Schools
As reported by the Detroit Free Press, a Michigan state Court of Claims judge held this week that the U.S. Supreme Court's Trinity Lutheran decision is not a basis for lifting a preliminary injunction issued earlier this month barring payment of $2.5 million the legislature had allocated to private schools to cover the cost of complying with state mandates. That injunction was based on a Michigan state constitutional provision that bars public funds for "any private, denominational or other nonpublic, pre-elementary, elementary, or secondary school". In Council of Organizations and Others for Education About Parochiaid v. State of Michigan, (MI Ct. Cl., July 25, 2017), the court said in part:
... the Court concludes at this juncture that the constitutional provision at issue in this case, Article 8, § 2 of the Michigan Constitution, can be understood as falling within the category of neutral and generally applicable laws, rather than n provision that singles out the religious for disfavored treatment.... [T]his Court is disinclined to extend the Trinity Lutheran decision to a case that plainly does not involve express discrimination.
Labels:
Michigan,
School aid
Wednesday, June 28, 2017
Supreme Court Remands School Aid Cases For Reconsideration In Light of Trinity Lutheran Decision
The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday, in light of its decision this week in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, sent back to the lower courts for reconsideration school aid cases from Colorado and New Mexico. All the cases remanded involved reliance on state Blaine amendments to invalidate aid to religious schools. In three consolidated cases from Colorado, the Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgments below, and remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for further consideration. The Colorado cases are Doyle v. Taxpayers for Public Education, (Docket No. 15-556), Douglas City School District v. Taxpayers for Public Education, (Docket No. 15-557), and Colorado State Board of Education v. Taxpayers for Public Education, (Docket No. 15-558). (June 27, 2017 Order List). In the cases, the Colorado Supreme Court struck down Douglas County's elaborate Choice Scholarship Pilot Program. (See prior posting.)
In New Mexico Association of Nonpublic Schools v. Moses, (Docket No. 15-1409), the Supreme Court also granted certiorari, vacated the judgment and remanded to the Supreme Court of New Mexico for further consideration. In the case, the New Mexico Supreme Court struck down a New Mexico statute that allows the state to lend secular textbooks to private and parochial school students. (See prior posting.)
In New Mexico Association of Nonpublic Schools v. Moses, (Docket No. 15-1409), the Supreme Court also granted certiorari, vacated the judgment and remanded to the Supreme Court of New Mexico for further consideration. In the case, the New Mexico Supreme Court struck down a New Mexico statute that allows the state to lend secular textbooks to private and parochial school students. (See prior posting.)
Labels:
Blaine Amendments,
School aid,
US Supreme Court
Friday, April 21, 2017
Canadian Provinces May Not Fund Non-Catholic Students In Catholic Schools
Canada's Constitution Act of 1867 (Sec. 93) guarantees Catholics and Protestants in the three Canadian provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario the right to petition the provincial government to create a separate denominational school for them when they comprise a minority in a school attendance area. In Good Spirit School Division No. 204 v. Christ the Teacher Roman Catholic Separate School Division No. 212, (QB Sask., April 20, 2017), a Saskatchewan trial court in a 230-page opinion held that it is a violation of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms for the provincial government to provide funding for non-Catholic students at government-supported Catholic schools. The court held that Catholic separate schools have no constitutional right to receive funding for non-Catholic students and that it violates the province's duty of religious neutrality, as well as guarantees of equality, to fund non-minority faith students in denominational schools. Global News reports on the decision.
Labels:
Canada,
Catholic schools,
School aid
Thursday, January 19, 2017
Florida Supreme Court Denies Review In Tax Credit Scholarship Challenge
Yesterday in McCall v. Scott, (FL Sup. Ct., Jan. 18, 2017) the Florida Supreme Court declined to hear in appeal in a case challenging the constitutionality of Florida's Tax Credit Scholarship Program. In August, a state appeals court held that a group of plaintiffs-- advocacy organizations, teachers, parents and religious and community leaders-- lack standing to pursue the case. (See prior posting.) Tampa Bay Times reports on the state Supreme Court's action.
Labels:
Florida,
School aid
Tuesday, September 13, 2016
2nd Circuit: Students Lack Standing To Challenge Diversion of Dollars To Religious Schools
In Montesa v. Schwartz, (2d Cir., Sept. 12, 2016), the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, held that plaintiffs-- dozens of students in the East Ramapo Central School District in New York state-- lack standing to sue over funds allegedly diverted by the school board to Orthodox Jewish schools. The students claim that the diversion-- in part through manipulation of payments under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act-- led to less funding for the public schools they attend. In denying standing, the majority said in part:
We have not found a case ... where an appeals court has recognized [plaintiffs'] theory of direct exposure—where the plaintiffs’ exposure is the loss of a favored governmental service or benefit caused, in part, by a diversion of public resources away from such service or benefit to support a preferred religion.... The Student‐Plaintiffs’ injury arises out of being enmeshed in an underfunded school system, not out of being directly exposed to the alleged unconstitutional IDEA Settlements themselves. An alleged causal connection between the underfunding of the school district’s budget and the alleged unconstitutional expenditures is insufficient to give rise to a direct injury. To hold otherwise would impermissibly expand the concept of direct exposure to include injuries that are unrelated to the challenged governmental act but which flow in fact from a government’s decision to fund one program or service at the expense of another. This is a theory of indirect injury and recognizing it would allow plaintiffs who are only incidentally affected by a challenged governmental expenditure to assert Establishment Clause claims.Judge Reiss dissented. Courthouse News Service reports on the decision.
Labels:
Establishment Clause,
School aid,
Standing
Friday, May 27, 2016
New Jersey Court Invalidates Capital Grants To 2 Religious Colleges
In American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey v. Hendricks, (NJ App., May 26. 2016), a New Jersey state appellate court held that grants to two religious colleges for capital improvements violate the provision in the New Jersey Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 3, that bars taxation "for building or repairing any church or churches, place or places of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or ministry...." The Department of Higher Education had awarded two grants totaling over $10 million to a Jewish school, Beth Medrash Govoha, and three grants totaling $645,323 to Princeton Theological Seminary. The court said that a 1978 New Jersey Supreme Court ruling interpreting Art. I, Sec. 8 compelled it to conclude that these grants of public funds were invalid. NJ.com reports on the decision.
Labels:
New Jersey,
Religious colleges,
School aid
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)