Previously, religious head coverings like Muslim hijabs and Jewish kippahs were allowed because they did not interfere with uniform covers, but per the March 16 instruction from the Bureau of Navy Personnel, there is no longer a requirement that an approved religious head covering be worn underneath the cover prescribed by the uniform of the day.[Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]
Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Wednesday, March 25, 2020
Navy Liberalizes Policy On Religious Head Coverings
The U.S. Navy, in a memo dated March 16 (full text), became the third branch of the armed forces to liberalize its policy on accommodation of religious headgear. As reported by Navy Times:
Labels:
Reasonable accommodation,
US Navy
Tuesday, March 24, 2020
Texas and Ohio COVID-19 Limits On Elective Medical Procedures Include Elective Abortions
Texas Tribune reports:
New York Times reports that Ohio imposed a similar ban last week.
Citing the need to preserve health care capacity for COVID-19 patients, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said Monday that abortions should not be performed unless the mother's life is in danger.
The warning comes one day after Gov. Greg Abbott ordered health care facilities and professionals to postpone all procedures that are deemed “not medically necessary” as the state gears up for an influx of patients with COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus.
The attorney general said that the order, set to expire April 21, should also be interpreted to cover abortion clinics in the state.Here is the Attorney General's press release.
New York Times reports that Ohio imposed a similar ban last week.
Britain Moves To Coronavirus Closures, Including Churches
Yesterday in Britain, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced stay-at-home restrictions for the country to combat the spread of COVID-19. He said in part:
To ensure compliance with the Government’s instruction to stay at home, we will immediately: .... we’ll stop all social events, including weddings, baptisms and other ceremonies, but excluding funerals.The Church of England quickly announced that all of its churches would close immediately. [Thanks to Law & Religion UK for the lead.]
Labels:
Britain,
Church of England,
COVID-19
Huthi Court In Yemen Upholds Anti-Baha'i Death Sentence and Dissolution Order
AFP reports that on Sunday, a Huthi run appellate court in Yemen upheld the death sentence of a member of the Baha'i faith, despite international appeals on his behalf:
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom issued a press release condemning the decision and said that the same court also upheld an order requiring dissolution of Baha'i institutions in Yemen.
Hamed bin Haydara, who has been detained since 2013, was not allowed into Sunday's hearing in the capital Sanaa that rejected his appeal against the sentence imposed more than a year ago, the community said....
The rebels are linked to Iran, whose Shiite clerical regime bans the Baha'i faith....The Baha'i International Community reports that there have been 18 appeals court hearings since bin Haydara was sentenced.
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom issued a press release condemning the decision and said that the same court also upheld an order requiring dissolution of Baha'i institutions in Yemen.
Monday, March 23, 2020
Ohio Stay-At-Home Order Exempts Religious Gatherings
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine yesterday announced a statewide stay-at-home order designed to limit the spread of the coronavirus. The Order (full text) requires all persons to stay at home unless engaged in "essential" work, activity or travel. Among the list of essential operations that may continue is:
Religious facilities, entities and groups and religious gatherings, including weddings and funerals.The Order takes effect at 11:59 pm today. Business Insider reports on the governor's action.
Recent Articles of Interest
From SSRN:
- Helen M. Alvare, Beyond Moralism: A Critique and a Proposal for Catholic Institutional Religious Freedom, (Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2019).
- Terri Day, Revisiting Masterpiece Cakeshop -- Free Speech and the First Amendment: Can Political Correctness Be Compelled?, (Hofstra Law Review, Volume 48 (Forthcoming)).
- Joao Pedro Padua, Discursive Devices for Inserting Morality Into Law: Initial Exploration From the Analysis of a Brazilian Supreme Court Decision, (Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito, Vol. 6(1), 2019, p. 11-29).
- Shamshad Pasarlay, Shīʿī Constitutionalism in Afghanistan: A Tale of Two Draft Constitutions, (Australian Journal of Asian Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, Article 1, 2020).
- Greer Donley, Parental Autonomy over Prenatal End-of-Life Decisions, (Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 105, Forthcoming).
- Jonathan J. Kim & Eugene Temchenko, Constitutional Intolerance to Religious Gerrymandering, 18 Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal 1-57 (2019).
- L. Darnell Weeden, Using Rational Basis Review in an Establishment Clause Challenge to an Alleged Muslim Travel Ban Undermines Religious Liberty, 18 Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal 165-186 (2019).
Labels:
Articles of interest
Saturday, March 21, 2020
Michigan Houses of Worship Exempted From Penalties For Violating COVID-19 Executive Order
On March 17, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer issued Executive Order 2020-11 (COVID-19) which banned assemblages of more than 50 people in a single indoor shared space, with limited exceptions. None of the exceptions related to houses of worship. However is an FAQs posting later in the week, the state said that while places of worship are covered, they are exempt from the penalty provisions that make willful violations of the ban a misdemeanor. Detroit Free Press reports on the developments.
Labels:
Church services,
COVID-19
Friday, March 20, 2020
Texas Judge Sues Over Right To Oppose Same-Sex Marriage
A county judge in Jack County, Texas has filed suit in a Texas federal district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent any future enforcement action by the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct against him. The complaint (full text) in Umphress v. Hall, (ND TX, filed 3/18/2020) alleges in part:
A few months ago, the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct issued a “public warning” to Dianne Hensley, a justice of the peace who recuses herself from officiating at same-sex marriage ceremonies on account of her Christian faith.... The Commission’s interpretation of Canon 4A(1) threatens every judge in Texas who refuses to perform same-sex marriages, as well as those who publicly evince disapproval of same-sex marriage or homosexual conduct in their extra-judicial activities.....
The Court should therefore declare that the First Amendment protects Judge Umphress’s right to conduct his extra-judicial activities in a manner that evinces disapproval of same-sex marriage and homosexual conduct.Pink News reports on the lawsuit.
Labels:
Judiciary,
Same-sex marriage,
Texas
Police Had Cause To Search Residence of Catholic Religious Order Member
In State of Connecticut v. Sawyer, (CT Sup. Ct., March 19, 2020), the Connecticut Supreme Court held that the search warrant that led to the arrest of a member of a Catholic religious order for possessing child pornography was properly issued. The court held that authorities had probable cause to search the residence of defendant, a member of The Brothers of Holy Cross, living with two other brothers in an apartment they rented from a West Haven Catholic church. Police acted on a report by one of defendant's roommates. AP reports on the decision.
Labels:
Catholic,
Child pornography,
Connecticut
New Hampshire Governor Sued Over Ban On Large Gatherings
One News Now reports that a lawsuit was filed yesterday in a New Hampshire state trial court challenging the Governor's COVID19- inspired emergency ban on gatherings of 50 or more people. The three plaintiffs argue that there is no emergency and that the ban violates their constitutional rights. Among the gatherings that plaintiffs wish to visit are religious services and Sunday school at a Baptist church. The court refused to issue an immediate temporary restraining order and scheduled a hearing for Friday.
Labels:
COVID-19,
New Hampshire
HHS Sued Over Non-Enforcement of LGBTQ Anti-Discrimination Rules
As previously reported, last November the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced actions that effectively allow agencies receiving HHS grants to refuse to serve gay, lesbian and transgender individuals and families on religious grounds. First, HHS issued a Notice of Non-Enforcement of rules adopted in 2016 that prohibit such discrimination. HHS then issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would repromulgate the rules with narrower anti-discrimination protections. Yesterday, a lawsuit was filed in a New York federal district court challenging the legality of the Notice of Non-Enforcement.
The complaint (full text) in Family Equality v. Azar, (SD NY, filed 3/19/2020) contends that the Notice of Non-Enforcement violates the Administrative Procedure Actin three ways. It was promulgated without notice-and-comment rule making. It was based on a mistaken determination that the 2016 original non-discrimination rule did not comply with the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. HHS failed to consider alternative remedies, the costs and benefits of their decision, and the public interest. Lambda Legal issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit, saying in part:
The complaint (full text) in Family Equality v. Azar, (SD NY, filed 3/19/2020) contends that the Notice of Non-Enforcement violates the Administrative Procedure Actin three ways. It was promulgated without notice-and-comment rule making. It was based on a mistaken determination that the 2016 original non-discrimination rule did not comply with the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. HHS failed to consider alternative remedies, the costs and benefits of their decision, and the public interest. Lambda Legal issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit, saying in part:
As the coronavirus pandemic continues to spread rapidly throughout the U.S., LGBTQ individuals of all ages are left vulnerable by the Trump administration’s illegal action, which implicitly permits discrimination when providing critical services.
Labels:
COVID-19,
HHS,
LGBT rights
Thursday, March 19, 2020
Maine Voters Refuse To Repeal Strengthened Vaccination Requirements
As reported by BJC, on Super Tuesday earlier this month, voters in Maine, by a 3-1 margin, rejected an attempt to repeal Maine's new stronger immunization law. The law removes the prior exemption for religious and philosophical objections to vaccination. The law goes into effect in September 2021.
Labels:
Maine,
Vaccination
USCIRF Fact Sheet On COVID-19's Impact on Religious Freedom
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom has issued a new Fact Sheet titled: The Global Response to the Coronavirus: Impact on Religious Practice and Religious Freedom.
Labels:
COVID-19,
International religious freedom
Maryland Amends Hate Crime Law
The Maryland General Assembly this week gave final passage to an amended hate crime law, making it easier to convict. The bill-- SB606/ HB917 (full text)-- defines a hate crime as one "motivated in whole or in substantial part" by a person's race, color, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, disability, or national origin, or because another person or group is homeless. Previously the law required the crime be committed "because of" such characteristics. WTOP News reports on the legislature's action.
Labels:
Hate crimes,
Maryland
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
White House Briefs New York's Orthodox Rabbis On COVID-19 Precautions
Jerusalem Post and Jewish Insider report that the White House yesterday held a conference call with 15 leading Orthodox rabbis in the New York area to encourage them to follow the White House guidelines designed to prevent the further spread of COVID-19. The call was conducted by Avi Berkowitz, an Orthodox Jew who is an assistant to the President. More than 100 people have tested positive for the coronavirus in New York's Orthodox Jewish Borough Park neighborhood. After the call, the Satmar Rebbe, Rabbi Aaron Teitelbaum, ordered all synagogues and Jewish schools in the largely Hasidic village of Kiryas Joel to close.
9th Circuit: Religious References At Sentencing Hearing Were OK
In United States v. Hong, (9th Cir., March 17, 2020), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that a district court did not violate defendants' free exercise rights at a sentencing hearing in a fraud case, saying in part:
The district court did not plainly err in describing how the Hongs used religion to carry out their fraudulent scheme, in commenting on video footage showing Grace Hong speaking to a church group, or in mentioning the spiritual harm suffered by the Hongs’ victims. The Hongs point to no binding legal authority precluding a sentencing court from considering the religion of the victims or noting the spiritual impact of an offense on the victims.
Labels:
Fraud,
Free exercise,
Sentencing
Judge May No Deduct Litigation Expenses Borne By His Legal Defense Fund
As previously reported, in 2018 the Oregon Supreme Court suspended state circuit court judge Vance D. Day from his judicial office for three years without pay. The suspension was based in part on Judge Day's refusal to solemnize same-sex marriages. Now in Vance v. Department of Revenue, (OR Tax Ct., March 13, 2020), the Oregon Tax Court held that Day improperly claimed as a deduction on his state income tax $128,000 in legal fees paid on his behalf by his legal defense fund.
Labels:
Oregon,
Same-sex marriage,
Taxes
Tuesday, March 17, 2020
Supreme Court Postpones Oral Arguments For Public Health Reasons
The U.S. Supreme Court announced yesterday that it is postponing oral arguments currently scheduled for it March session because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Included in the cases postponed are Tanzin v. Tanvir (availability of money damages under RFRA) and the consolidated arguments in two cases involving the scope of the Ministerial Exception doctrine (Our Lady of Guadalupe v. Morrissey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel). The Court's press release added:
The Court’s postponement of argument sessions in light of public health concerns is not unprecedented. The Court postponed scheduled arguments for October 1918 in response to the Spanish flu epidemic. The Court also shortened its argument calendars in August 1793 and August 1798 in response to yellow fever outbreaks.
Labels:
COVID-19,
US Supreme Court
Monday, March 16, 2020
Recent Articles of Interest
From SSRN:
- Itamar Mann, Zionism and Human Rights, (International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 17 issue 4 (October, 2019)).
- Ram Rivlin, Family Law and Religion in Israel, (March 9, 2020).
- Barbara E. Armacost, Celebrating Robert Cochran and the Future of "Embodied" Christian Legal Scholarship, (Pepperdine Law Review, Forthcoming).
- Amy J. Sepinwall, Conscience in Commerce, (February 19, 2020).
- Emad H. Atiq, Review of 'Natural Law and the Nature of Law,' by Jonathan Crowe, (Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2020).
- Daniel Peterson, Case Note: Constitutional Court Decision No 93/PUU-X/2012 on Shari’a Banking Dispute Resolution, (Australian Journal of Asian Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, Article 7, 2020).
- Natalie Silver, When Charity No Longer Begins and Ends at Home: The Australian Government's Regulatory Response to Charities Operating Overseas, (Adelaide Law Review, 40:3, 2019, pp. 755-782).
From SmartCILP and elsewhere:
- Sarah A. Morgan Smith, Commonwealth As Civic Communion, [Abstract], 57 University of Louisville Law Review 467-500 (2019).
- Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 34, Issue 3 (Dec. 2019) has recently appeared.
Labels:
Articles of interest
Sunday, March 15, 2020
6th Circuit Upholds Company's Religious Accommodation For Jehovah's Witness
In Small v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water, (6th Cir., March 12, 2020), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of an employment discrimination claim by a Jehovah's Witness. The court concluded that Memphis Light adequately accommodated their employee's religious beliefs when it allowed him to swap shifts with other employees. Judge Thapar filed a concurring opinion, criticizing the Supreme court's Hardison decision.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)