Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Showing posts sorted by date for query same-sex marriage. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query same-sex marriage. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Friday, February 09, 2018
Former Magistrate Receives Damages In Settlement Over Refusal To Perform Same-Sex Marriages
According to a press release this week from Becket, the North Carolina court system last November agreed to a settlement with a former North Carolina magistrate who was forced to resign in 2014 because of her objections to performing same-sex marriage ceremonies. Under the settlement of a complaint filed with the EEOC, magistrate Sandra Myrick will receive $210,000 in damages and $115,000 in attorneys fees. (Full text of settlement agreement). The settlement came 8 months after the decision by an Administrative Law Judge in Myrick v. Warren, (EEOC, March 8, 2017) holding that the EEOC has jurisdiction over Myrick's religious discrimination complaint under the Government Employees Rights Act of 1991. The ALJ also concluded that Myrick had demonstrated a prima facie case of religious discrimination and that she had not been offered an accommodation.
Labels:
EEOC,
Same-sex marriage
Wednesday, February 07, 2018
California Baker May Refuse To Create Cake For Same-Sex Wedding
A California state trial court has held that a bakery owner has the right to refuse to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple when the owner has religious objections to same-sex marriage. The court pointed out:
The Unruh Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, as well as sexual orientation.The bakery had arranged to refer orders from same-sex couples to a competing bakery that has no objections. In Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Miller, (CA Super., Feb. 5, 2018), the court said in part:
The right of freedom of thought guaranteed by the First Amendment includes the right to speak, and the right to refrain from speaking. Sometimes the most profound protest is silence....
No artist, having placed their work for public sale, may refuse to sell for an unlawful discriminatory purpose. No baker may place their wares in public display case, open their shop, and then refuse to sell because of race, religion, gender, or gender identification.
The difference here is that the cake in question is not yet baked. The State is not petitioning the court to order defendants to sell cake. The State asks this court to compel Miller to use her talents to design and create cake she has not yet conceived with the knowledge that her work will be displayed in celebration of marital union her religion forbids. For this court to force such compliance would do violence to the essentials of Free Speech guaranteed under the First Amendment.The Bakersfield Californian reports on the decision.
Labels:
California,
Free speech,
Same-sex marriage
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Inter-American Human Rights Court Recognizes Same-Sex Marriage and Transgender Rights
In an Advisory Opinion (full text in Spanish) dated Nov. 24, 2017, but apparently first published on Jan. 9, 2018, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that the American Convention on Human Rights requires governments to recognize family rights of same-sex couples and transgender rights. As reported by the Washington Blade:
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights on Tuesday issued a landmark ruling that recognizes same-sex marriage and transgender rights in the Western Hemisphere.
The seven judges who issued the ruling stated governments “must recognize and guarantee all the rights that are derived from a family bond between people of the same sex.” Six of the seven judges also agreed that it is necessary for governments “to guarantee access to all existing forms of domestic legal systems, including the right to marriage, in order to ensure the protection of all the rights of families formed by same-sex couples without discrimination.”
The court issued its ruling after the Costa Rican government in 2016 asked for an advisory opinion on whether it has an obligation to extend property rights to same-sex couples and allow transgender people to change their name and gender marker on identity documents.
The ruling says the Costa Rican government must allow trans people to legally change their name and gender marker on official documents.According to La Voz, "Costa Rica is the only country that gives the same weight to a CIDH ruling as it does to a national court’s judicial decision."
Suit Contends Ministerial Exception Does Not Bar Hostile Work Environment Claims
Yesterday's Cook County Record reports on a hostile work environment lawsuit filed in federal court in Chicago by Sandor Demkovich, former organist and music director of St. Andrew the Apostle Church in Calumet City, Illinois. Demkovich was fired several days after he entered a same-sex marriage. His earlier lawsuit charging employment discrimination was dismissed on "ministerial exception" grounds. The new lawsuit argues that the ministerial exception doctrine does not apply to hostile work environment claims.
Tuesday, December 26, 2017
Top Church-State and Religious Liberty Developments of 2017
Each year in December, I attempt to pick the most important church-state and religious liberty developments of the past year-- including developments internationally in the mix. Usually I select the top ten, but this year I have expanded it to 11. The selection obviously involves a good deal of subjective judgment, and I welcome e-mail comment from those who disagree with my choices. So here are my Top Eleven picks for the rather chaotic year that is currently coming to an end:
1. President Trump issues and reissues restrictions on immigration and entry of refugees which are challenged in the courts as "Muslim bans."
2. Supreme Court's Trinity Lutheran Church decision opens the possibility of expanded governmental aid to religious institutions.
3. Christian Evangelicals remain core supporters of Donald Trump.
4. Trump Administration expands religious and moral exemptions from ACA contraceptive coverage mandate; court challenges filed.
5. The Masterpiece Cakeshop case attracts over 90 amicus briefs as it is argued before the Supreme Court. The Christian baker's refusal to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple becomes a symbol of the cultural clash between ideals of religious freedom and equality, even though arguments focus on free speech issues.
6. Congress fails to repeal the Johnson Amendment, despite promises by President Trump.
7. Transgender discrimination and transgender service in the military remain high profile religious and cultural issues in the courts and in the political arena.
8. The Alt-Right march in Charlottesville reveals resurgence of traditional forms of anti-Semitism.
9. Supreme Court's decision in Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton saves retirement plans of religiously affiliated health care networks from unanticipated and costly ERISA coverage.
10. In Israel, government's suspension of an agreement with Judaism's Reform and Conservative movements to construct a separate prayer space at the Western Wall for egalitarian prayer opens a rift with a large segment of the American Jewish community.
11. India's Supreme Court invalidates Triple Talaq marriage for Muslims in India.For top picks by other observers of the legal and religious scene, see Don Byrd's Top Ten Religious Liberty Stories, and Religion News Association's Top 10 Religion Stories of the Year Poll.
Labels:
Top stories
Monday, December 18, 2017
Recent Articles of Interest
From SSRN:
- Bruce Ledewitz, Is Religion a Non-Negotiable Aspect of Liberal Constitutionalism?, (Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2017, No. 2, 2017).
- Robin Bradley Kar, Transformational Marriage: The Religious Case for Supporting Same-Sex Marriage, (The Contested Place of Religion in Family Life, p. 375, 2018 (Cambridge University Press) (ed., Robin Fretwell Wilson), Forthcoming).
- Michael A. Helfand, The Future of Religious Arbitration in the United States: Looking Through a Pluralist Lens, (Oxford Legal Handbook on Global Legal Pluralism, Paul Schiff Berman ed., 2018 Forthcoming).
- Richard Schragger & Micah Schwartzman, Jews, Not Pagans, (Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2017-67 (Dec. 2017)).
- Daniel O. Conkle, Religion, Law, and the Constitution, (Foundation Press, 2016).
- Eric Che Muma, The Impact of Anti-Terrorism Laws on Religious Freedom: Cameroon's Approach in Combating Terrorism and the Role of the Church, (Proceedings of the RAIS Conference: The Future of Ethics, Education and Research, 2017).
- Andras Koltay & Jeroen Temperman, Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression in Western Liberal Democracies, (Forthcoming as "Introduction" in: Jeroen Temperman and AndrĂ¡s Koltay (Eds.), Blasphemy and Freedom of Expression: Comparative, Theoretical and Historical Reflections after the Charlie Hebdo Massacre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 1-21).
- Mohammad Hasan Javadi, Behzad Balazadeh & Mehdi Ghoreyshi, Restoring Dignity in Islamic Law, (December 10, 2017).
From SmartCILP:
- Lucien J. Dhooge, The Impact of State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts: An Analysis of the Interpretive Case Law, [Abstract], 52 Wake Forest Law Review 585-647 (2017).
Labels:
Articles of interest
Friday, December 15, 2017
Indonesia's Constitutional Court Refuses To Criminalize All Sex Outside of Marriage
Reuters reports that Indonesia's Constitutional Court yesterday in a 5-4 decision rejected a petition seeking to expand the definition of adultery in Indonesian law to cover not just married couples, but all sexual relations outside of marriage. The petition was filed by the conservative Family Love Alliance (AILA). Rights activists feared that the petition was particularly aimed at the LGBT community. The Court majority held that any change in the law is a matter for Parliament, not the court. Currently, same-sex relations between adults is outlawed only in the province of Aceh.
Labels:
Indonesia,
LGBT rights
Monday, December 11, 2017
Antagonists In Same-Sex Marriage Saga will Now Face Each Other In 2018 Election
In 2015, Rowan County, Kentucky clerk Kim Davis was at the center of the battle over same-sex marriage as she was held in contempt for refusing to allow her office to issue marriage licenses to same-sex coupled. (See prior posting.) One of the individuals who was denied a marriage license was David Ermold. Last week, Ermold filed papers to run against Davis for the Clerk position next year. Papers, of course, were filed in Davis' office. The Luxora Leader reports:
... Ermold, alongside his now-husband, filled out the paperwork to run for office with Davis sitting across from him:
Davis smiled and welcomed them, chatting with them about the state retirement system and the upcoming Christmas holiday. She made sure Ermold had all of his paperwork and signatures to file for office, softly humming the old hymn ‘Jesus Paid It All’ as her fingers clacked across a keyboard.
When it was over, she stood and shook hands with Ermold, telling him: ‘May the best candidate win.'
Labels:
Kentucky,
Same-sex marriage
Thursday, December 07, 2017
Australia Approves Same-Sex Marriage
As reported by the New Zealand Herald, Australia's Parliament has given final approval to same-sex marriage. The vote comes after a government mail survey showed that 61.6% of Australians favored marriage equality. (See prior posting.) Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Bill 2017 passed the House of Representatives yesterday. It was approved 43-12 last week by the Senate. It now goes to the Governor General for royal assent. The Herald reports further:
Amendments meant to safeguard freedoms of speech and religion for gay-marriage opponents were all rejected, though those issues may be considered later. The government has appointed a panel to examine how to safeguard religious freedoms once gay marriage is a reality in Australia....
The current bill allows churches and religious organizations to boycott gay weddings without violating Australian anti-discrimination laws.
Existing civil celebrants can also refuse to officiate at gay weddings, but celebrants registered after gay marriage becomes law would not be exempt from the anti-discrimination laws.
One of the rejected amendments would have ensured Australians could speak freely about their traditional views of marriage without fear of legal action.ABC News says that the first same-sex weddings could take place as early as January 9.
Labels:
Australia,
Same-sex marriage
Monday, December 04, 2017
Recent Articles of Interest
From SSRN:
- Ronald Niezen, Power Through Testimony: Reframing Residential Schools in the Age of Reconciliation (Foreword), (March 2017, ISBN: 978-0774833899).
- Katherine M. Franke & Elizabeth Reiner Platt, Amicus Brief to U.S. Supreme Court in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Human Rights Commission, (Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-566 (Oct. 2017)).
- Paul Johnson, Robert M. Vanderbeck & Silvia Falcetta, Religious Marriage of Same-Sex Couples: A Report on Places of Worship in England and Wales Registered for the Solemnization of Same-Sex Marriage, (November 24, 2017).
- Steven G. Calabresi, The Free Exercise of Religion, (Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 17-26 (Nov. 2017)).
- Douglas NeJaime & Reva Siegel, Religious Accommodation, and Its Limits, in a Pluralist Society, (Religious Freedom and LGBT Rights: Possibilities and Challenges for Finding Common Ground (Robin Fretwell Wilson & William N. Eskridge, Jr. eds., Cambridge Univ. Press 2018 Forthcoming).
- Santiago Legarre, A New Natural Law Reading of the Constitution, (78:3 Louisiana Law Review (2018 Forthcoming)).
- Ellen P. Aprill, Amending the Johnson Amendment in the Age of Cheap Speech, (University of Illinois Law Review On-Line (Forthcoming)).
- Khaled A. Beydoun & Abed Ayoub, Executive Disorder: The Muslim Ban, Emergency Advocacy, and the Fires Next Time, (22 Michigan Journal of Race & Law 215 (2017)).
- Abenaa Owusu-Bempah, Hate Crime and the Legal Process: Options for Law Reform, (LSE Law - Policy Briefing Paper No. 29 (Nov. 2017)).
- Robert Leckey, Judging in Marriage's Shadow, (Feminist Legal Studies, Forthcoming).
- Jainlin Chen, Chapter 2, The Law and Religious Market Theory: China, Taiwan and Hong Kong, (Cambridge University Press 2017).
- Joseph E. David, Love, Law and the Judeo-Christian Separation-Individuation,(November 15, 2017).
- Joseph E. David, Divinity, Law, and the Legal Turn in the Study of Religions, (May 15, 2017).
- Lua K. Yuille, Creating a Babel Fish for Rights & Religion: Defining 'Rights' Through Sacred Texts, (25 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 309-361 (2016)).
From SSRN (Islamic law and society):
- Intisar A. Rabb, The Curious Case of Bughaybigha, 661–883: Land and Leadership in Early Islamic Societies, (Justice and Leadership in Early Islamic Courts, Edited by Intisar A. Rabb and Abigail Krasner Balbale (2017)).
- Fajri Matahati Muhammadin & Hanindito Danusatya, De-Secularizing Legal Education in Indonesia: Examining the 'Introduction to Jurisprudence' Textbooks on Norm Classification, (International Seminar on Islamic Civilization and Thought (2017), Conference Proceeding).
From SmartCILP:
- Shai Silverman, Before the Godly: Religious Arbitration and the U.S. Legal System, 65 Drake Law Review 719-779 (2017).
- Lucien J. Dhooge, The Equivalence of Religion and Conscience, [Abstract], 31 Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 253-292 (2017).
Labels:
Articles of interest
Monday, November 27, 2017
Recent Articles of Interest
From SSRN:
- Philip J. Candreva, Playground or Church? Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. Comer, (Public Administration Review, Forthcoming).
- Julie Ringelheim, State Religious Neutrality as a Common European Standards? Reappraising the European Court of Human Rights Approach, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 6, no.1, p. 1-24 (2017)).
- Scott W. Gaylord, Is a Cake Worth a Thousand Words? Masterpiece Cakeshop and the Impact of Antidiscrimination Laws on the Marketplace of Ideas, (Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 85, Forthcoming).
- Mark Strasser, Obergefell's Legacy, (24 Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy 61-88 (2016)).
From SmartCILP:
- Heidi Liu & Caleb C. Wolanek, Applying Strict Scrutiny: An Empirical Analysis of Free Exercise Cases, 78 Montana Law Review 275-312 (2017).
- Symposium, The Teachings of Pope Francis: Toward a Vision of Social Justice and Sustainable Capitalism? (Introduction by Steven W. Bender; articles by Michael Kaufman, Steven A. Ramirez, Nicholas Capaldi, Gilbert Paul Carrasco, Iryna Zaverukha, Russell Powell, Dean Vincent Rougeau, Amelia J. Uelmen). 40 Seattle University Law Review 1167-1415 (2017).
- Rev. John C. Lentz Jr., The Bystander in the Bible, 2017 Utah L. Rev. 661-705.
- Marcia L. McCormick, Religious Privilege to Discriminate as Religious Freedom: From Charitable Choice to Faith Based Initiatives to RFRA and FADA, 56 Washburn Law Journal 229-243 (2017).
- John R. Dorocak, How Might a Church's Tax-Exempt Status (and Other Advantages) Be Revoked Procedurally for Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage or Be Defended Possibly as Free Exercise of Religion?, [Abstract], 53 Willamette Law Review 161-184 (2017).
- Sarah M. Stephens, Freedom From Religion: A Vulnerability Theory Approach to Restricting Conscience Exemptions in Reproductive Healthcare, 29 Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 93-121 (2017).
Labels:
Articles of interest
Wednesday, November 15, 2017
Australian Government Survey By Mail Favors Same-Sex Marriage
The Australian Bureau of Statistics yesterday released the results of its national postal survey on whether the law should be changed to allow same-sex marriage. (Press release; full survey results). 61.6% of respondents voted "yes"; 38.4% voted "no". The press release expanded on the data:
All states and territories recorded a majority Yes response. Of the 150 Federal Electoral Divisions, 133 recorded a majority Yes response, and 17 Federal Electoral Divisions recorded a majority No response.
12,727,920 million people participated in the voluntary survey – representing 79.5 per cent of the more than 16 million eligible Australians.CNN reports that celebrations broke out across Australia after the results were announced. (See prior related posting.)
Labels:
Australia,
Same-sex marriage
Thursday, November 09, 2017
Republican Senators Call For Roy Moore To Withdraw From Senate Race After Sex Charges
According to the Washington Post, a number of Republican senators are calling for Roy Moore, Alabama candidate for the U.S. Senate, to withdraw if charges in an earlier Washington Post article today are true. The article, based on detailed interviews with named accusers, says that Moore engaged in improper sexual contact with a 14-year old girl nearly 40 years ago when Moore was a 32 year-old assistant district attorney. Three other women say Moore tried to date them when they were between 16 and 18 years old. Moore, well known for his battles defending a Ten Commandments monument and opposing same-sex marriage, says that the charges "are completely false and are a desperate political attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post." The special election in Alabama in which Moore faces Democratic nominee Doug Jones is scheduled for Dec. 12.
UPDATE: Defending Moore, Alabama State Auditor Jim Zeigler told the Washington Examiner: "[T]ake Joseph and Mary. Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus. There’s just nothing immoral or illegal here. Maybe just a little bit unusual."
UPDATE: Defending Moore, Alabama State Auditor Jim Zeigler told the Washington Examiner: "[T]ake Joseph and Mary. Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus. There’s just nothing immoral or illegal here. Maybe just a little bit unusual."
Labels:
Election results,
Roy Moore,
Sex abuse claims
Tuesday, November 07, 2017
USDA Memo Gives Meat Packing Plants Broad Religious Speech Protection
ADF reported yesterday on a new Guidance Memorandum on First Amendment Policy issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of Food Safety (full text), and a related Q&A webpage. While the Guidance Memorandum appears to flow from President Trump's Executive Order Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty issued in May (see prior posting), and a follow-on Memo from the Secretary of Agriculture, it also resolves a particular dispute relating to a Michigan meat-packing plant. Federal meat inspectors working at the plant had removed an article placed on the plant's break room table that expressed religious views opposed to same-sex marriage. Apparently a USDA official, invoking an Obama-era Policy Statement on sexual harassment, had threatened to withdraw all its inspectors if the article reappeared. The new Guidance Memorandum gives broad permission for employees and supervisors at meat plants to express religious views, saying in part:
Employees are permitted to engage in religious expression directed at fellow employees and may attempt to persuade other employees of the correctness of their views. Religious views should be treated the same as any other comparable speech not involving religion. Proselytizing is as entitled to constitutional protection as any other form of speech.
Supervisors are also free to engage in speech about religion. While supervisors may not impose unfair work conditions on employees who do not share their religious beliefs, their personal views concerning religion are still protected by the First Amendment. As a result, supervisors may also express their sincere religious views without fear of sanctions.
Some employers in facilities that are inspected by USDA may wish to display religious icons, religious pamphlets, or faith-based messages in publicly available work areas or on public websites. Others may support employee religious organizations and openly express their own religious beliefs or practices in the workplace. USDA employees must act to avoid the limiting or chilling of protected speech.The Guidance Memorandum adds that USDA employees who believe they are subject to discrimination, harassment or intimidation may still exercise their rights.
Saturday, October 28, 2017
British Court Upholds Removal of Christian Social Work Student Over Facebook Comments
As reported by The Guardian and by a press release from Christian Concern, a British trial court judge yesterday upheld a decision by Sheffield University to remove graduate student Felix Ngole from his 2-year MA program in Social Work because of comments he posted on Facebook. In 2015, commenting on the widely publicized case of Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis, Ngole, a devout Christian, said: "same sex marriage is a sin whether we like it or not. It is God’s words and man’s sentiments would not change His words." Ngole argued that the University's action infringed his free expression rights. High Court Judge Rowena Collins Rice ruled, however:
Public religious speech has to be looked at in a regulated context from the perspective of a public readership. Social workers have considerable power over the lives of vulnerable service users and trust is a precious professional commodity.
Labels:
Britain,
Facebook,
Same-sex marriage
Mississippi Suit On Gay Marriage Recusals Is Reopened
In June, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed for lack of standing a challenge to Mississippi's broad Conscience Protection Act. (See prior posting.) In October, an en banc rehearing was denied. In light of this, yesterday a Mississippi federal district court in Campaign for Southern Equality v. Bryant, (SD MI, Oct. 27, 2017), issued an order (full text) reopening a challenge to the law insofar as it allows county clerks to recuse themselves from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples because of religious or moral objections to same-sex marriage. The Order also authorized plaintiffs to serve interrogatories to determine how many Clerk's Offices have employees that have sought to recuse themselves, and how the recusals are handled. AP reports on the order.
Labels:
LGBT rights,
Mississippi,
Same-sex marriage
Monday, October 16, 2017
Recent Articles of Interest
From SSRN:
- Marc O. DeGirolami, On the Uses of Anti-Christian Identity Politics, (Religious Freedom and LGBT Rights: Possibilities and Challenges for Finding Common Ground (Robin Fretwell Wilson & William Eskridge eds., Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming)).
- Adam Hersh, Daniel in the Lion's Den: A Structural Reconsideration of Religious Exemptions from Nondiscrimination Laws Since Obergefell, (Stanford Law Review, Forthcoming).
- Marc O. DeGirolami, The Two Separations, (The Cambridge Companion to the First Amendment and Religious Liberty (Michael Breidenbach & Owen Anderson eds., Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming)).
- Michael J. Perry, Conscience v. Access and the Morality of Human Rights, With Particular Reference to Same-Sex Marriage, (William Eskridge and Robin Fretwell Wilson (eds.), Religious Freedom, LGBT Rights, and the Prospects for Common Ground (Cambridge University Press), Forthcoming).
- Robin Bradley Kar, Transformational Marriage: How to End the Culture Wars Over Same-Sex Marriage, (The Contested Place of Religion in Family Life (Cambridge University Press 2018) (Robin Fretwell Wilson, ed.), Forthcoming).
- John Osogo Ambani, A Triple Heritage of Sexuality? Regulation of Sexual Orientation in Africa in Historical Perspective, (Sylvie Namwase & Adrian Jjuuko, Protecting the Human Rights of Sexual Minorities in Contemporary Africa, Pretoria University Law Press, 2017).
- Nathan B. Oman, Commerce, Religion, and the Rule of Law, (Journal of Law, Religion & the State, (Forthcoming)).
- Zachary D. Kaufman, Jesner v. Arab Bank: U.S. Foreign Policy and National Security Interests, (Just Security, 2017).
- Mark Stern, et. al., The Judicial and Generational Dispute over Transgender Rights, (Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, Forthcoming).
- Mark Strasser, Marriage, Divorce, and Domicile, (85 University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 145-86 (2016)).
- Dana Brakman Reiser, Disruptive Philanthropy: Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability Company, and the Millionaire next Door, (Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 536 (2017)).
From SmartCILP:
- J. Shoshanna Ehrlich, Ministering (In)justice: The Supreme Court's Misreliance on Abortion Regret in Gonzales v. Carhart, [Abstract],17 Nevada Law Journal 599-617 (2017).
- Rene Reyes, The Mixed Blessings of (Non-)Establishment, 80 Albany Law Review 405-428 (2016-2017).
- Lisa Shaw Roy, The Unexplored Implications of Town of Greece v. Galloway, 80 Albany Law Review 877-891 (2016-2017).
Labels:
Articles of interest
Wednesday, September 27, 2017
Roy Moore Wins Republican Runoff In Alabama
Former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore won yesterday's Alabama Republican U.S. Senate primary runoff, prevailing over Luther Strange who has served in the U.S. Senate for six months. Moore won by a vote of 55% to 45%. (Official results).
As reported by CNN:
Moore Tweeted from his victory rally: "There's one person you don't see on this stage that's done more for my campaign than anybody, and that's almighty God." In a second Tweet, he added: "We have to return to the acknowledgment of God, and the United States Constitution."
As reported by CNN:
Moore now faces Democratic nominee Doug Jones in a December general election in the race to replace Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
Moore's win Tuesday night will thrust his long history of homophobic and racially tinged remarks into the spotlight.
He has campaigned on a platform of placing Christianity at the center of public life. In 2003, Moore was removed as state Supreme Court chief justice for refusing to take down a Ten Commandments monument. He was re-elected to the job, and then ousted again in 2016, when he refused to follow the US Supreme Court's ruling legalizing same-sex marriage.
Though Alabama is a solidly red state, Democrats hope Jones, a former federal prosecutor who rose to prominence by leading the government's case against two perpetrators of the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing, can make the race competitive.Here is additional background on Moore from Wikipedia.
Moore Tweeted from his victory rally: "There's one person you don't see on this stage that's done more for my campaign than anybody, and that's almighty God." In a second Tweet, he added: "We have to return to the acknowledgment of God, and the United States Constitution."
Labels:
Alabama,
Roy Moore,
U.S. Senate
Tuesday, September 26, 2017
Today Is Alabama Senate Primary Runoff Between Moore and Strange
Today in Alabama, Republican voters go to the polls in the runoff U.S. Senate primary race between incumbent Luther Strange and former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore. Moore is known for his high profile battles in which he refused to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the Alabama Supreme Court building and his defiance of the U.S. Supreme Court's same-sex marriage ruling. Al.com reports that in his final campaign rally last night, Moore told a large crowd: "For whatever reason, God has put me in this election at this time and all of the nation is watching."
Labels:
Alabama,
Roy Moore,
U.S. Senate
Monday, September 25, 2017
Recent Articles of Interest
From SSRN:
- Rahman Apalara, Striking a Balance: Freedom of Expression and the Prohibition of Hate Speech and Offensive Remarks, (September 11, 2017).
- Nadia N. Sawicki, A Common Law Duty to Disclose Conscience-Based Limitations on Medical Practice, (Chapter 13 in Law, Religion, and Health in the United States (Lynch, Holly Fernandez, I. Glenn Cohen, and Elizabeth Sepper eds., 2017).
- Nomi Maya Stolzenberg, From Eternity to Here: In Search of the Origins of Secularism, (USC Legal Studies Research Papers Series No. 17-20 (2017)).
- Adam J. White, Justice Scalia's Soulcraft as Statecraft, (June 15, 2017).
- Noa Ben-Asher, Faith-Based Emergency Powers, (Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, Forthcoming).
- Steven J. Heyman, The Light of Nature: John Locke, Natural Rights, and the Origins of American Religious Liberty, (Marquette Law Review, Forthcoming).
- Terri Lynn Helge, Rejecting Charity: Why the IRS Denies Tax Exemption to 501(C)(3) Applicants, (Pittsburgh Tax Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2016).
- Ming-Sung Kuo & Hui-Wen Chen, The Brown Moment in Taiwan: Making Sense of the Law and Politics of the Taiwanese Same-Sex Marriage Case in a Comparative Light, (Columbia Journal of Asian Law, Forthcoming).
- Mehdi Shadmehr, Khomeini's Theory of Islamic State and the Making of the Iranian Revolution, (September 16, 2017).
- Jikon Lai, Lena Rethel & Kerstin Steiner, Conceptualizing Dynamic Challenges to Global Financial Diffusion: Islamic Finance and the Grafting of Sukuk, (Review of International Political Economy, 2017).
- Aklavya Anand & Shailesh Kumar, Public Domain of Personal Laws: An Inquiry from the Perspectives of Conflict of Interests and Identities, (NLSIU Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume IV, Special Issue, 2017).
From SmartCILP:
- Wim Decock, Law, Religion, and Debt Relief: Balancing Above the 'Abyss of Despair' in Early Modern Canon Law and Theology, [Abstract], 57 American Journal of Legal History 125-141 (2017).
- Anton Sorkin, Graduation Ceremonies: A Prayer for Balancing Sponsorship and Censorship, 41 Southern Illinois University Law Journal 345-402 (2017).
Labels:
Articles of interest
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)