Objective coverage of church-state and religious liberty developments, with extensive links to primary sources.
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Suit Challenges Selective Service Handling of Conscientious Objectors
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Government Report Says Most Volunteering Is Through Faith-Based Organizations
New York's Syrian Jewish Community Reacts To Rabbis' Arrests
Some in the community are criticizing FBI informant, Solomon Dwek, son of a Syrian Jewish rabbi in Deal, New Jersey. Dwek was a key in obtaining evidence against those arrested. On Saturday, Dwek's father denounced the concept of Jews informing on each other during a study session at his synagogue. Then, to emphasize the point, Rabbi Dwek co-taught a class with Rabbi Edmund Nahum, one of those arrested and released on bail. On a Jewish radio program Saturday night, Sam Hirsch, a former Borough Park assemblyman, called for Solomon Dwek to be ostracized by the community. He also analogized Dwek to the halachic concept of a moser, the Jewish informer who was to be executed. Hirsch backed off his remark later.
The Forward article also has a lengthy discussion of the possible impact of the indictments on the rivalry between factions in Deal's Orthodox Jewish community.
"WWJD" Debt Collection Suit Voluntarily Dismissed After Counterclaims Filed
Indiana Atheist Bus Campaign Lawsuit Settled
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Dearborn (MI) Wrestling Coach Sues Principal Claiming Religious Bias
The complaint (full text) in Marszalek v. Fadlallah, (ED MI, filed 7/27/2009), alleges more broadly:
57. Defendant Fadlallah, since assuming duties as Fordson’s principal in 2005, has systematically weeded out Christian teachers, coaches, and employees, and has terminated, demoted, or reassigned them because of their Christian beliefs, expressions, and associations. Defendant Fadlallah acts in this manner because Christian beliefs are inconsistent with his personal Muslim beliefs.The lawsuit, challenging Marszalek's firing, alleges discrimination, due process violations, and infringement of free exercise, speech and association rights under various provisions of the U.S. and Michigan constitutions. It also alleges violations of Michigan's Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act and a claim for tortious interference with advantageous business relationships. Yesterday's Detroit Free Press reported on the lawsuit.
58. Defendant Fadlallah has publicly stated "he sees Dearborn Fordson High School as a Muslim school, both in students and faculty, and is working to that end," or words to that effect.
A press release by the Thomas More Law Center that filed the suit on behalf of Marszalek quotes TMLC president Richard Thompson, who made a broader assertion. He said: "We are getting a glimpse of what happens when Muslims who refuse to accept American values and principles gain political power in an American community. Failure to renew coach Marszalek’s contract had nothing to do with wrestling and everything to do with religion."
Japan's Catholic Bishops Says Clergy Should Not Serve As Citizen Judges
Author Criticizes Religious Views of Nominee For Head of NIH
At Washington Meeting With Chinese, Obama Raises Religious Freedom Issue
The White House has posted a press release and video of the President's remarks.[T]he United States respects the progress that China has made by lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. Just as we respect China's ancient and remarkable culture, its remarkable achievements, we also strongly believe that the religion and culture of all peoples must be respected and protected, and that all people should be free to speak their minds. And that includes ethnic and religious minorities in China, as surely as it includes minorities within the United States.
Support for human rights and human dignity is ingrained in America. Our nation is made up of immigrants from every part of the world. We have protected our unity and struggled to perfect our union by extending basic rights to all our people. And those rights include the freedom to speak your mind, to worship your God, and to choose your leaders. These are not things that we seek to impose -- this is who we are. It guides our openness to one another and to the world.
Nigerian Rebels Demanding Sharia Expand Attacks On Security Forces
Monday, July 27, 2009
India's Defense Minister OK's Beards In Military For Muslim Men
Texas County May Contract With Chaplain Service For Employees
Recent Articles of Interest
- Elliott Visconsi, The Invention of Criminal Blasphemy: Rex v. Taylor (1676), (Representations, Vol. 103, pp. 30-52, Summer 2008).
- Lea Bishop Shaver, The Inter-American Human Rights System: An Effective Institution for Regional Rights Protection?, (July 22, 2009).
- Francis Joseph Mootz, Faith and Politics in the Post-Secular Age: The Promise of President Obama, (July 13, 2009).
- Erin J. Cox, Freeing Exercise at Expression's Expense: When RFRA Privileges the Religiously Motivated Speaker, (UCLA Law Review, Vol. 56, p. 169, 2008).
- Prakash Shah, The Indian Dimension of An-Na'im's Islam and the Secular State, (Islam and Europe: Crises Are Challenges, Marie-Claire Foblets & Jean-Yves Carlier, eds., Leuven University Press, 2009).
- MarÃa Fraile Ortiz, The Islamic Headscarf: Does Context Matter?, (InDret, Vol. 3, 2008).
- Andrew F. March, Are Secularism and Neutrality Attractive to Religious Minorities? Islamic Discussions of Western Secularism in the 'Jurisprudence of Muslim Minorities' (Fiqh Al-Aqalliyyat) Discourse, (Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 2821-2854, 2009).
From SmartCILP and elsewhere:
- Symposium on the Environment, 23 Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics & Public Policy 429-697 (2009).
- Jeffrey Shulman, Making Sense of the Establishment Clause, Engage, Vol. 10, Issue 2, p. 4 (2009).
- George W. Dent, Jr., The Growing Clash Between Religious Freedom and the Gay Movement, Engage, Vol. 10, Issue 2, p. 7 (2009).
Sunday, July 26, 2009
"Flying Imams" Can Proceed Against Airport Security Officers For Search and Arrest
In Shqeirat v. U.S. Airways Group, Inc., (D MN, July 24, 2009), the court wrote, in part:
The court however did dismiss plaintiffs' claims against US Airways holding that it was not a state actor and that law enforcement officers did not substitute the airline's judgment for their own. the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported on the decision yesterday. (See prior related posting.)MAC Defendants suggest that the attacks of September 11, 2001—perpetrated by men of Middle Eastern descent who espoused a radical version of Islam—justifies a massive curtailment of liberty whenever terrorism, and in this case, the suspicion of Islamic terrorism, is concerned. Unquestionably the events of 9/11 changed the calculus in the balance American society chooses to make, especially in airport settings, between liberty and security. Ultimately, the proper balance will be achieved, in large part, because we have the most capable and diligent law enforcement and intelligence communities in the world. But when a law enforcement officer exercises the power of the Sovereign over its citizens, she or he has a responsibility to operate within the bounds of the Constitution and cannot raise the specter of 9/11 as an absolute exception to that responsibility.
On the record before the Court, no reasonable officer could have believed they could arrest Plaintiffs without probable cause. The right that was violated is clearly established, and, thus, the MAC Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity. Accordingly, summary judgment is denied on the unreasonable seizure claim.
USAID Inspector General Raises Questions About Religious Nature of Some Grants
This audit surveyed 31 USAID regional legal advisors, as well as 9 of the 10 faith-based organizations that receive the most USAID funding, concerning the use of USAID funds for religious activities. From these responses, audit staff found that some USAID-awarded funds were used for religious activities in four contracts that amounted to more than $325,000. These funds were used for the rehabilitation of mosques and adjoining community centers in Iraq. USAID also funded, within a program to combat HIV/AIDS, lesson plans that contained Biblical applications and discussions.Both the Washington Post and BeliefNet News reported last week on the IG's audit.
However, USAID officials were unsure whether such uses of Agency funding violated Agency regulations or the Establishment Clause .... In their view, the relevant legal precedent relating to the separation of church and state, and its application overseas—especially in light of foreign policy objectives—complicated the decision-making process about what activities should or should not be funded. USAID requested legal clarification on this issue from the Department of Justice in 2007 but has not received final guidance...
Georgia Judicial Council Permits Religious Head Coverings In Courtrooms
Head coverings are prohibited from the courtroom except in cases where the covering is worn for medical or religious reasons. To the extent security requires a search of a person wearing a head covering for medical or religious reasons, the individual has the option of having the inspection performed by a same-sex officer in a private area. The individual is allowed to put his or her own head covering back on after the inspection is complete.
Canada's High Court Rejects Hutterite Challenge To License Photo Requirement
The Province's evidence demonstrates that the existence of an exemption from the photo requirement would materially increase the vulnerability of the licensing system and the risk of identity‑related fraud. Second, the universal photo requirement for all licensed drivers minimally impairs the s. 2(a) right. The impugned measure is reasonably tailored to address the problem of identity theft associated with driver’s licences. The evidence discloses no alternative measures which would substantially satisfy the government’s objective while allowing the claimants to avoid being photographed.The majority also rejected a claim that the universal photo requirement infringes the equal protection guarantee of Sec. 15 of the Charter.
Justices Abella, LeBel and Fish each wrote a dissent. They stressed both the significant impact of the universal photo requirement on the Hutterite's religious beliefs and argued that the regulation is not a proportionate response to the problem of identity theft. Yesterday's Calgary Herald, reporting on the decision, says that the Hutterites are considering the possibility of leaving the province for a location that would be friendlier to them. Today's Lethbridge (AB) Herald also reports on the decision after interviewing the lawyer who represented the losing Hutterite colony.
Islamic Restictions Increasingly Being Enforced In Gaza
Analysis Says European Fears Regarding Muslim Communities Appear Unfounded
Recent Prisoner and Institutionalized Persons Free Exercise Cases
In Ayotte v. McPeek, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62163 (D CO, June 5, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim that his free exercise rights were infringed when his requests to replace his defective hearing aids were denied.Plaintiff alleged, along with other claims, that he has been prevented from fully understanding the religious programs that he attends in prison.
In Modlenaar v. Liberatore, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62842 (WD NY, July 21, 2009), a New York federal district judge allowed a former Attica inmate to move ahead against a corrections officer in a suit challenging a denial of kosher food for six days while he was on a medically restricted diet.
In Pratt v. Hogan, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63086 (ND NY, July 6, 2009), a civilly committed patient claimed that his required sex offender treatment program violated his free exercise rights. He alleged that he was an atheist, and the Good Lives Model and Boundaries Program compels one to believe in "spirituality" and includes relaxation programs that are partly based on eastern Zen practices. A New York federal district court concluded that defendants are entitled to qualified immunity because it was objectively reasonable for them to perceive no constitutional violations in implementing the program.
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Suit Against Children Services Officials By Muslim Mother Is Mostly Dismissed
Plaintiffs fail to cite a single precedent establishing that, even when viewed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiffs, Defendants acts--placement in a Christian foster home, refusal to place them in a Muslim foster home, refusal to provide them with a list of Muslim leader's phone numbers, or falsely reporting in FCCS' administrative file that they did not want to practice Islam--interfered with their right to free exercise. Accordingly, they have waived their free exercise claim by failing to support or develop it.Plaintiffs were permitted to move ahead with claims under Section 1983 that the social worker interfered with protected rights of familial association and that she retaliated for plaintiff's engaging in protected speech. Plaintiffs were also permitted to proceed with a state law claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. The social worker was charged with falsifying facts in her administrative file on the children.
Evangelist Tony Alamo Convicted On Mann Act Charges
3rd Circuit Says RLUIPA Zoning Challenge Is Not Ripe
Friday, July 24, 2009
4th Circuit Says Warden Has Qualified Immunity In Demotion of Rastafarian Officer
Saskatchewan Court Says Marriage Commissioner May Not Refuse To Perform Gay Weddings
M.J. and other members of the public do not have to depend upon encountering a marriage commissioner who has no moral or religious objection to performing a same sex marriage in order to gain access to an entitlement to be married without discrimination. Regardless of the religious basis of Mr. Nichols’ views, his acting on them in this manner constitutes discrimination in the provision of a public service on the basis of sexual orientation. Any accommodation of Mr. Nichols’ religious views, if the duty to accommodate exists, is not the responsibility of those who seek the services that he is legally empowered to provide. If any accommodation is due to Mr. Nichols for his religious views, it must be accomplished without risking what occurred here – where the complainant sought a service and was expressly denied it on the basis of his sexual orientation....Reporting on the decision, the Regina (SK) Leader-Post says that provincial officials will still move ahead with plans to obtain a Court of Appeal ruling on the constitutionality of a proposed law that would exempt marriage commissioners from performing same-sex marriages if they object to doing so for religious reasons. (See prior related posting.)
I am sympathetic to the argument that a public official acting as government is at the same time an individual whose religious views demand respect. However, a public official has a far greater duty to ensure that s/he respects the law and the rule of law. A marriage commissioner is, to the public, a representative of the state. She or he is expected by the public to enforce, observe and honour the laws binding his or her actions. If a marriage commissioner cannot do that, she or he cannot hold that position.
Religious Objections To USDA's Animal Tagging Program Rejected
All but one of the plaintiffs live in Michigan and the lawsuit focused on Michigan's adoption of NAIS as a means of combating tuberculosis in cattle. The court dismissed claims against the U.S. Department of Agriculture because plaintiffs' alleged injuries stemmed from the independent decision of the Michigan Department of Agriculture (MDA) to adopt the program, and not from action by the USDA. It dismissed claims under RFRA and NEPA against the MDA, because neither of those federal statutes apply to states. It dismissed claims that MDA failed to comply with state law on 11th Amendment grounds, and rejected supplemental jurisdiction over three state law claims. AP reported on the decision. (See prior related posting.)
Court Says It Can Apply Neutral Principles To Fiduciary Claim Against Church Trustees
Nigeria Begins New Push To Tax Unrelated Income of Religious Groups
Utah Court Rejects Settlement In FLDS Trust Reform; Texas Custody Case Ends
Meanwhile, in a separate case, the state of Texas ended state custody of the last of the 439 children who been taken by child welfare officials from the FLDS' Yearning for Zion Ranch in 2008. (See prior posting.) Yesterday's Salt Lake Tribune reports that the girl, now 15, was placed with her aunt, and the girl's mother, Barbara Jessop, was given the right to supervised visits. Allegedly the girl was spiritually married to former FLDS leader Warren Jeffs when she was 12.
Oregon Jury Acquits Faith Healing Parents On All But One Misdemeanor Charge
Nurse Sues Hospital Claiming She Was Required To Assist In Abortion Procedure
Thursday, July 23, 2009
5 Rabbis Among 44 Arrested In New Jersey Public Corruption and Money Laundering Probe
The mayors of Hoboken, Secaucus and Ridgefield, the Jersey City deputy mayor and council president, two state assemblymen, numerous other public officials and political figures and five rabbis from New York and New Jersey were among 44 individuals charged today in a two-track federal investigation of public corruption and a high-volume, international money laundering conspiracy.According to the Newark Star-Ledger, the rabbis arrested were connected to the prosperous and close-knit Syrian Jewish community of Brooklyn (NY) and Deal (NJ). (The Syrian Jewish community was profiled in a 2007 New York Times Magazine article.) Today's press release summarized charges against the rabbis:
Eliahu Ben Haim, of Long Branch, N.J., the principal rabbi of a synagogue in Deal, N.J., charged with money laundering of proceeds derived from criminal activity.It went on to describe the money laundering portion of the charges as follows:
Saul Kassin, of Brooklyn, N.Y., the chief rabbi of a synagogue in Brooklyn, New York, charged with money laundering of proceeds derived from criminal activity.
Edmund Nahum, of Deal, N.J., the principal rabbi of a synagogue in Deal, charged with money laundering of proceeds derived from criminal activity.
Mordchai Fish, of Brooklyn, N.Y., a rabbi at a synagogue in Brooklyn, charged with money laundering of proceeds derived from criminal activity. His brother [Lavel Schwartz], also a rabbi, was charged as well.
The money laundering conspiracy involved high-ranking religious figures and their associates in Brooklyn, N.Y. and Deal, N.J. Among them was Eliahu Ben Haim, of Long Branch, N.J., the principal rabbi of Congregation Ohel Yaacob in Deal, N.J. Typically ... Haim received bank checks in amounts ranging from tens of thousands of dollars up to $160,000 at a time made payable to a charitable, tax-exempt organization associated with Haim and his synagogue. To complete the money laundering cycle, Haim would return the amount of the check in cash ..., less a cut for Haim, typically 10 percent....The release emphasized the importance in the investigation of a cooperating witness who infiltrated the money laundering network and later dealt with various public officials who are being charged with bribery. The Wall Street Journal says that the cooperating witness is Orthodox Jewish real estate developer Solomon Dwek who had been arrested on bank-fraud charges in 2006. The FBI began using Mr. Dwek as an informant in mid-2007, wiring him and videotaping his encounters with targets of the investigation.
Similar circles of money launderers in Brooklyn and Deal, N.J. operated separately but occasionally co-mingled activities and participants. In most cases, the rings were led by rabbis who used charitable, non-profit entities connected to their synagogues to "wash" money that they understood came from criminal activity like bank fraud, counterfeit goods and other illegal sources.... [T]he rabbis made significant sums in fees, which typically ran between five and ten percent per transaction.
Court Refuses To Strike Allegation In School Music Lawsuit
Questions Raised Over Financing Of Rep. Keith Ellison's Hajj Trip
India's Supreme Court Withdraws Opinion On Catholic School's Grooming Policy
County Will End Ban On Sunday Sales Despite Some Religious Objections
Sikh Crime Victims In London Can Now Request Sikh Officer For Case
Buddhist Candidate For Virginia Legislature Responds To Concerns
[F]or the last decade or more, like millions of Americans, I have practiced meditation. Sometimes I walk and sometimes I sit. But always, taking a break from daily activity helps me think about my life and connect with a deeper truth. With increasing scientific evidence for the benefits of meditation to calm the stress of today’s busy world, it’s no wonder that this simple practice has spread to corporate boardrooms, hospitals, schools, and even churches across the United States.
It is understandable that people are curious about and may even fear things that they do not understand. So it is a service to civil discourse for people of different faiths to share their beliefs and practices in a spirit of mutual respect and tolerance. Recognizing that all major religions teach the same basic ideas –to seek truth, promote love, and care for God’s creation — faith can be a way to bring us all together on a higher plane.
But all too often religion is used by misguided leaders to pull our communities apart and to sow the seeds of discord. This is a misuse of religious faith in my opinion, and I feel compelled to speak out against religious prejudice and bigotry.
So, to those who would court intolerance for political gain, I say: in America, you will lose. In Virginia, you will lose. And in the Shenandoah Valley and Highland County, you will lose.
Anti-Separationist Billboards Placed In Two Florida Counties
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
PA Supreme Court: Civil Courts Can Hear Defamation Claim Against Catholic School
[W]hile appellees explain ... that "[t]he communication of the expulsion provided example of the religious values of the [S]chool to parent and student alike" ..., appellees do not contend that such religious rationale for the Post-expulsion Communications required that the Communications specifically allege that Eric brought a "penknife" or "weapon" to school. Thus, this is not a case in which religious authority would be directly relevant to a party’s showing on the merits of his or her opponent’s claims.... [N]eutral principles can be applied to determine whether the Post-expulsion Communications were defamatory.
Wisconsin Supreme Court: Ministerial Exception Applies To Catholic School Teacher
We conclude that both the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment ... and the Freedom of Conscience Clauses in Article I, Section 18 of the Wisconsin Constitution preclude employment discrimination claims ... for employees whose positions are important and closely linked to the religious mission of a religious organization.... Ostlund's school was committed to a religious mission——the inculcation of the Catholic faith and worldview—— and Ostlund's position was important and closely linked to that mission. Therefore, Ostlund's age discrimination claim underthe WFEA unconstitutionally impinges upon her employer's right to religious freedom.Justice Crooks dissenting opinion argued:
the majority's conclusion that based on the facts here CCS infuses its secular subjects with religion effectively extends a free pass to religious schools to discriminate against their lay employees....Yesterday's Chicago Tribune reports on the decision.
ACLU Has Taxpayer Standing To Challenge Charter School As Promoting Islam
Kentucky County Removes 10 Commandments After Lawsuit Is Filed
Kenya Says Muslim Girls Can Wear Hijab To School
Non-Muslims Find British Shariah Courts Attractive
Russian Schools Will Begin Courses On Religions and Ethics
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Laotian Village Chief Tells Christian Families To Renounce Their Beliefs
The chief of Katin village, along with village security, social and religious affairs officials, warned all 53 Christian residents that they should revert to worshiping local spirits in accordance with Lao tradition or risk losing all village rights and privileges – including their livestock and homes... The previous Sunday (July 5), officials and residents confiscated one pig each from nine Christian families and slaughtered the animals in an effort to force them to renounce their faith....The article chronicles a long history in this particular village of actions against Christian families living there.
Senate Passes Resolution Condemning Anti-Semitism
Protests Continue Over LDS Regulation Of Plaza In Salt Lake City
Opponents of Hate Crimes Bill Add Amendments That Make It More Contentious
The first Sessions Amendment would allow the death penalty to be applied in hate crimes cases under some circumstances. This Amendment is unnecessary and is a poison pill designed to kill the bill. The Amendment is being offered by and supported by Senators who oppose the Matthew Shepard Act. It’s ironic that the very Senators who have falsely argued that this bill would put clergy in jail because of their beliefs think that those same clergy should be subject to the death penalty.In response to the addition of the death penalty language, the Senate then passed a Democratic-sponsored amendment that would limit hate crime prosecutions until a state's attorney general has created standards for applying capital punishment. The death penalty amendment, offered by Sen. Sessions, was approved by unanimous consent despite a letter (full text) from 50 civil rights and religious groups opposing the amendment.
The second Sessions Amendment would place an additional burden on the Justice Department to revise its long established guidelines for hate crimes cases. This Amendment is unnecessary. The Department already contains well-established, clear and precise guidelines to govern cases involving bias-motivated violence that work well.
Finally, the third Sessions Amendment would provide additional penalties for crimes involving service members or their families. This Amendment is unnecessary. Existing statutes already provide special penalties on attacks against members of the Armed Services and veterans. In addition, the vague language of the Amendment is problematic. The Amendment provides for additional penalties for injuring the property of a serviceman or immediate family member. The scope of "family member" or what constitutes an "injury" to their property is unclear.
Meanwhile, according to yesterday's Washington Blade, the ACLU has issued a statement pressing for the House, rather than the Senate, version of the hate crimes bill. The House bill, H.R. 1913, was passed by the House in April. (See prior posting.) Concerned about freedom of speech and association, the ACLU favors language in the House bill that prohibits introducing substantive evidence of expression or association at trial unless it specifically relates to the offense charged. The House language though would not change evidentiary rules on the impeachment of witnesses. Chris Anders, ACLU senior legislative counsel, said that "an otherwise unremarkable violent crime" should not become a federal offense because the defendant viewed the wrong web site, belonged to a group espousing bigotry or subscribed to a magazine that promotes discriminatory views.
Project Will Rate Muslim Countries On Adherence To Shariah
Members of Congress Join In Rally To Protest Falun Gong Persecution By China
Obama Meets At White House With Mormon Leader
Monday, July 20, 2009
Israeli Court Awards Damages To Bedouin Family Excluded From Swimming Pool
Competing Lawsuits Filed In Dispute Over Religious Services At Co-op Unit
While settlement negotiations were going on, Canopus-- without advance notice-- filed in state court. The complaint (full text) in Canopus Realty Corp. v. Bondi, (Sup. Ct. Putnam Co., filed 7/2/2009) seeks a declaratory judgment that Bondi does not have a right to run a business, including his Church, from his residence, and that enforcement of the lease terms that restrict use to residential purposes does not violate state or federal civil rights laws. In response, New York filed a housing discrimination lawsuit against the cooperative. The complaint (full text) in New York State Division of Human Rights v. Canopus Realty Corp., (Sup. Ct. Putnam Co., filed 7/14/2009), alleges religious discrimination, saying that the cooperative does not prevent other residents from inviting guests to their homes or to the co-op's clubhouse. It asks for a declaratory judgment, injunction and damages, as well as various broader remedial actions by Canopus. Courthouse News Service today reports on the lawsuits.
Recent Articles of Interest
- William W. Van Alstyne, Religion in the Workplace: A Report on the Layers of Relevant Law in the United States, (Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2009).
- Reid K. Weisbord & Peter DeScioli, The Effects of Donor Standing on Philanthropy: Insights from the Psychology of Gift-Giving, (Gonzaga Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 2, January 2010).
From SmartCILP:
- Charlton C. Copeland, God-Talk in the Age of Obama: Theology and Religious Political Engagement, 86 Denver University Law Review 663-691 (2009).
- Josh Goodman, Divine Judgment: Judicial Review of Religious Legal Systems in India and Israel, 32 Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 477-528 (2009).
- Robin Fretwell Wilson, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty: Life After Prop 8, 14 NEXUS 101-111 (2008-2009).
Texas Town Is Changing City Council Invocation Policy
Iranian Singer Sentenced In Abstentia To 5 Years For Recording of Quranic Verses
Consent Order Entered In Challenge To City's Speech Ordinance
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases
In Mecca Allah Shakur v. Sieminski, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60796 (D CT, July 16, 2009), a Connecticut federal district court rejected an inmate's claim that his free exercise rights were violated when he was allowed to attend congregate religious services only in "Q-Unit", a step-down unit from administrative segregation, instead of being able to attend them in the prison's main building.
In Price v. Owens, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58844 (ND GA, April 28, 2009), a Georgia federal district court held that an inmate's free exercise and RLUIPA challenges to a prison's grooming policy is not subject to the "continuing violation" or "continuing tort" doctrine for purposes of determining whether the statute of limitations has run. The statute runs from the time of the first application of the grooming policy to plaintiff, and not from each haircut. In Price v. Owens, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58840 (ND GA, July 8, 2009), the court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the matter.
In Mayo v. Norris, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59531 (ED AR, June 29, 2009), an Arkansas federal magistrate judge recommended that the court dismiss an inmate's claim that assessment of various fees against his inmate trust account violates his free exercise rights. Plaintiff alleged that he is a "Disciple of Jesus Christ," and assessing those fees violates Romans 13:8. He says the practice "is contrary to the doctrine of Jesus, thus hindering me from obeying the doctrine of my Savior to the salvation of my soul."
In Powell v. Smith, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58906 (ED CA, June 25, 2009), a California federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that his free exercise rights were infringed when he was stripped searched in the presence of female corrections officers. Plaintiff asserted that this practice violated his Muslim religious beliefs.
improperly confiscated his personal property (including religious objects) for extended periods of time, unreasonably restricted his access to religious ceremonies, and desecrated the prison's Native American sacred grounds.
Washington State Begins Rulemaking To Head Off Holiday Display Confusion At Capitol
A handful of displays had been allowed in a third-floor hallway of the Legislative Building, not far from a 30-foot noble fir sponsored by the Association of Washington Business for the holidays. A real estate agent then added a Nativity creche. After that, the Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation put up an atheist placard equating religion with myth, two Christian displays were added mocking atheism, and a Jewish group displayed a menorah. Fourteen applications had been filed when the department issued a moratorium on further displays.
Priest's Conviction Upheld Over Challenge To Testimony Regarding Religion
Unlike the first trial, on retrial there was no testimony regarding Catholic Church doctrine, the power that priests have traditionally had over parishioners, or internal church procedures regarding allegations of abuse. Because the charging statute requires proof of certain elements that directly touch and concern religious practices, it is impossible to prove the charged offense without some religion-related testimony. After reviewing the limited religion-related testimony from Father McDonough, we are satisfied that the district court carefully adhered to the Bussmann I admonitions and admitted only such religion-related testimony as was necessary for the state to prove the charged offense. We conclude that the religion-related testimony did not excessively entangle church doctrine with civil law.
Court Says FLDS Members Cannot Intervene In UEP Trust Litigation
potential beneficiaries of charitable trusts have no right to make claims on such trusts. Because the UEP Trust is a charitable trust, the only individuals with legally cognizable interests are the Utah and Arizona Attorneys General (A.G.s) as representatives of the community, and the Court-designated Special Fiduciary.The court also issued an order requiring the Utah Attorney General to forward certain disputed funds to the court, and scheduled a hearing on the sale of the Berry Knoll Farm property-- land that FLDS says should be a holy temple site. Funds are needed by the Trust to meet accrued debts.
Saturday, July 18, 2009
2nd Circuit: Muslim Scholar Gets Chance To Challenge Visa Denial
British Police Can Obtain Accommodation for Pagan Holidays
Hawaiian Church Sued Over Construction On Former Cemetery Site
3rd Circuit: Trial Court Properly Refused To Interfere In State Civil Rights Probe
Friday, July 17, 2009
US Military Trains Afghan Army To Show Its Muslim Face To Locals
8th Circuit Upholds School's Literature Distribution Policy
Under a prior school policy, members of the Gideons were permitted to distribute Bibles in 5th grade classrooms during school hours. In a challenge to the policy, the district court entered a permanent injunction prohibiting any distribution of Bibles to elementary school children on school property during the school day. (See prior posting.) The Court of Appeals upheld the continuation of that injunction. The court then moved to consider whether to uphold the district court's declaratory judgment relating to the new policy. Chief Judge Loken, writing the primary opinion, said:
the Judgment neither enjoined the District from implementing the new policy nor declared that policy unconstitutional. Rather, it cross referenced an amended complaint seeking a declaration “that Defendants’ actions in instituting” the new policy violated the Establishment Clause. The precise import of the declaratory judgment is hopelessly obscure. Given its impact on the operations of a state governmental entity, this ambiguity alone requires reversal.He then went on to also reject a facial Establishment Clause challenge to the new policy, finding that any major objection to it was obviated by the injunction that, as he read it, precluded the distribution of Bibles even under the new policy. Judge Beam concurring said he believes that the injunction only prohibits the earlier practice of distributing Bibles in classrooms. Judge Kyle concurred, saying that while he believes that the new literature distribution policy was passed for the purpose of promoting Christianity, he could concur because, in his view, "the portion of the court’s opinion discussing the new policy under Lemon is dicta...." Liberty Counsel yesterday issued a press release on the decision, as did Americans United.