New Jersey Synagogue Files Court Appeal of Zoning Decision

The Clifton Journal reported Friday that the Clifton, New Jersey Orthodox Jewish congregation, Shomrei Torah, has filed an appeal in state court of a zoning decision that severely limits the size of the synagogue that Shomrei Torah plans to build.  Plans to turn an existing house into a synagogue by building on an addition were rejected.  The city's planning board voted 7-0 to limit the size of the proposed synagogue to 7,000 square feet in area or 35 feet in height-- a 57% reduction in the originally proposed square footage in order to insure that the synagogue meets requirements for number of parking spaces and conform the building to the neighborhood.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Muhudin v. Wegener, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166954 (D CO, Dec. 14, 2015), a Muslim inmate alleged that he was denied a halal diet.  A federal magistrate judge ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days that corrects a number of pleading defects.

In Boyce v. McKnight, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167197 (ND IL, Dec. 15, 2015), an Illinois federal district court permitted an inmate to proceed against one a correctional officer who the inmate claimed pepper sprayed him in retaliation for the inmate's exercise of religion.

In In re Jaynes, 88 Mass. App. Ct. 745 (MA App., Dec. 16, 2015), the Massachusetts Appeals Court upheld a probate court's denial of a Wiccan inmate's petition to change his name for religious reasons, in light of the inmate's history of using multiple aliases. Boston Herald reports on the decision.

In Bennett v. Turner, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167874 (ND IA, Dec. 16, 2015), an Iowa federal district court gave an inmate 30 days to file an amended complaint alleging that removing all churches from the list of numbers he could call substantially burdened his free exercise of religion.

In Torres v. Aramark Food & Commissary Services, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168188 (SD NY, Dec. 16, 2015), a New York federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint under the free exercise clause that the nutritional inadequacy of the Ramadan meals, combined with the inability to supplement the meals with food from the commissary, forced him to switch from the Ramadan diet.

In Johnson v. Poupore, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168837 (ND N Y, Dec. 16, 2015), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's complaint that authorities confiscated his gold cross and chain and would not allow him to designate his religion as both Nation of Islam and Catholic under rules that allow only one designated religion at a time. He attempted to add the Catholic designation in order to be allowed to recover his gold cross. UPDATE: The court adopted the magistrate's recommendations at 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9147, Jan. 27, 2016.

In Boykins v. Lanigan, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169293 (D NJ, Dec. 16, 2015), a New Jersey federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to obtain prayer oil from a third-party vendor instead of the prison chaplain.

In Moore v. Katavich, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169634 (ED CA, Dec. 18, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend a Muslim inmate's complaint that on three separate days the prison kitchen staff served him a vegetarian diet instead of his Halal diet.

In Fox v. Magana, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167571 (ED NC, Dec. 14, 2015), a North Carolina federal district court permitted a female inmate to move ahead with her complaint that she is not given adequate time to practice her religion and is not permitted to conduct worship services outside while other fiaths are permitted to do so.

Settlement Reached In Challenge To Terms of Indiana County's Open Forum Ordinance

On Friday the Thomas More Society announced that a settlement agreement (full text) has been reached in Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Franklin County, Indiana.  The suit followed the adoption of a county ordinance that, in order to insulate from challenge the display of a nativity scene, made the county courthouse a public forum for all types of expressive activities. In the suit, FFRF and the Satanic Temple objected to a provision in the ordinance that limits the open forum to county residents. (See prior posting.) Under the settlement agreement, the ordinance will be amended to merely require a local contact who works or resides in either Franklin county or an adjacent Indiana county for any unattended display.

Majority of Texas City Council Resign Over Holding of Forum Sponsored By FFRF

12 News this week reports that three members of the China, Texas City Council have resigned over the last month, apparently primarily because the mayor permitted the Freedom From Religion Foundation to hold a public panel discussion in city hall in October.  According to the Facebook page for the panel discussion:

The purpose of this event is to dispel misconceptions, gain accurate information about FFRF's ongoing involvement in SETX [Southeast Texas] school districts, and to discuss local and legal policies surrounding religion in public schools.

The resignations leave city council without a quorum to transact business. The Agenda for the Dec. 22 Council Meeting includes "Nominations for Vacant Council Seats."  Friendly Atheist blog has more on the controversy and a link to a video of the FFRF panel discussion.

New Appropriations Bill Includes Extensions of Charitable Contribution Tax Incentives

Yesterday President Obama signed into law the 887-page Consolidated Appropriations Act 2016.  Division Q of the bill is the "Protecting Americans From Tax Hikes Act" which made permanent a number of tax provisions that create incentives for charitable giving [scroll to pg. 805 of the bill]:

Sec. 111. Extension and modification of special rule for contributions of capital gain real property made for conservation purposes.

Sec. 112. Extension of tax-free distributions from individual retirement plans for charitable purposes.

Sec. 113. Extension and modification of charitable deduction for contributions of food inventory.

Sec. 114. Extension of modification of tax treatment of certain payments to controlling exempt organizations.

Sec. 115. Extension of basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property.

Calligraphy Assignment Involving Shahada Leads To Early Winter Break For Virginia Students

As reported by CNN, on Thursday afternoon Augusta County, Virginia school officials shut down all the schools a day early for winter break after information about a World Religion assignment handed out a week earlier received broad coverage and triggered threats to the school system.  At issue was an assignment in a high school world geography course-- taken from a standard workbook, World Religions, first published in 1995-- that was designed to acquaint students with Arabic calligraphy. The workbook assignment said:

Since Islam forbids idolatry, mosques are decorated with calligraphy rather than human or animal figures.... Here is the shahada, the Islamic statement of faith, written in Arabic.  In the space below, try copying it by hand.  This should give you an idea of the artistic complexity of calligraphy.

On Tuesday, the Augusta County School superintendent issued a press release explaining the assignment after some parents expressed concern to him.  As reported by Al Jazeera, high school parent Kimberly Herndon, one of the main objectors, posted a call on her Facebook page for the teacher involved to be fired because "she had [students] write an abomination to their faith and causes a little girl to cry herself to sleep because she was worried she had denounced her God."  Herndon accused the teacher of attempting to indoctrinate students "into a religion of hate."  In a press release on Thursday, the school superintendent announced:

Following parental objections to the World Geography curriculum and ensuing related media coverage, the school division began receiving voluminous phone calls and electronic mail locally and from outside the area. As a result of those communications, the Sheriff’s Office and the school division coordinated to increase police presence at Augusta County schools and to monitor those communications. The communications have significantly increased in volume today and based on concerns regarding the tone and content of those communications, Sheriff Fisher and Dr. Bond mutually decided schools and school offices will be closed on Friday, December 18, 2015.

This was followed up by an additional press release yesterday. Perhaps ironically, the early closure of schools apparently resulted in the cancellation of a number of Christmas programs, including choir and band concerts, scheduled for yesterday which students had been preparing for some time.

White House Convenes Forum on America's Religious Pluralism

As reported by Religion News Service, yesterday the White House convened a forum titled Celebrating and Protecting America’s Tradition of Religious Pluralism. Invited participants included secularists.  The program began with remarks by Melissa Rogers, head of the White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships, who emphasized that "there are no second-class faiths" in the United States. A video of the entire forum is available on YouTube.  The Department of Justice has posted the full text of remarks at the forum by Vanita Gupta, head of the Civil Rights Division.

Britain's Law Commission Studies Possible Reform of Marriage Laws

Yesterday Britain's Law Commission published a 97-page background paper that lays the groundwork for possible reform of the country's marriage laws.  The publication, Getting Married: A Scoping Paper, highlighted two key policy areas that need examination in any reform: (1) whether non-religious organizations or independent celebrants should be able to conduct marriage ceremonies; and (2) how far the rules for entering civil partnerships should mirror the rules for marriage. Law & Religion UK has more on the Law Commission's report.

India's Supreme Court Balances Religious Rights Against Social Reform

In Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala Sangam v. Government of Tamil Nadu, (India Sup. Ct., Dec. 16, 2015), the Supreme Court of India came down with a complicated holding on the constitutionality of an administrative order ("GO") adopted by the State of Tamil Nadu that attempts to eliminate the hereditary priesthood in Hindu temples.  It provides instead that "any person who is a Hindu and  possessing the requisite qualification and training" is eligible for appointment.  This was challenged by an association representing Hindu priests as well as by individual priests as infringing Constitutional rights of freedom of religion and of religious denominations to manage their own affairs.  India's First Post describes the Supreme Court's holding:

[T]he crucial purpose of the GO was to eliminate the monopoly of Brahmins as priests in the temples of Tamil Nadu. The idea was to open these positions to all suitable candidates from all castes who had obtained the appropriate training in the centres set up by the government.

The petitioners on the other hand contended that this GO went against the fundamental tenets of the Hindu religion, represented here by the agama shastras which prescribed how the rituals were to be carried out and who could be appointed as priests to Hindu temples. It was argued that following the agama shastras were “essential religious practices” protected under Article 26 of the Constitution which if deviated from on the basis of a GO, would amount to an invasion of the right of a denomination to carry out its religious practices.

[The Supreme Court] ... upheld the [GO] but with a rider that appointments made under it can be challenged on a case-by-case basis, as being contrary to the agama sastras or customs. But crucially, the agama sastras or customs may themselves be subject to scrutiny by the court to see if they are contrary to the provisions of the Constitution of India. The court has thus tried to strike a balance between two very contradictory impulses in our polity: The right to practice one’s religion and the social reform of religious practices.

Suit Challenges New Rule Excluding Religious Schools From Montana Scholarship Tax Credit Law

The Montana Department of Revenue in a notice (full text) certified to the Secretary of State on Dec. 14 that it has adopted, as proposed, Rule 1 (full text) that excludes religiously affiliated schools from participating in the state's new School Contributions Tax Credit law. (See prior posting.)  On Dec. 16. three mothers sued the state challenging the new rule.  The complaint (full text) in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, (MT Dist. Ct., filed 12/16/2015) claims that the exclusion of religiously affiliated schools is inconsistent with the intent of the legislature in enacting the scholarship tax credit law, and contends that the exclusion violates the free exercise, establishment and equal protection clauses of the Montana and U.S. Constitutions.  Institute for Justice announced the filing of the lawsuit.

Montana has a procedure for committees of the state legislature to weigh in on whether they believe that a particular proposed rule is consistent with legislative intent.  Using that procedure, the relevant committees of the Montana House and Senate voted that the proposed rule is inconsistent with legislative intent. (Notice of Legislative Poll).  The results of this legislative poll are admissible in evidence in the suit challenging the new rule.

The Great Falls Tribune reported yesterday:

Montana Solicitor General Dale Schowengerdt submitted comments while the rule was still in draft form that said a judge would likely decide it is unconstitutional to categorically exclude religious entities from a neutral benefits program without reason.

“The Attorney General believes that it would not be defensible,” Schowengerdt wrote of Montana Attorney General Tim Fox.

But Fox will have to defend the rule in the lawsuit and another expected to be filed in federal court. The Department of Justice is the attorney for the state when an agency is sued.

Catholic School Violates Mass. Law By Refusing To Hire Applicant Who Is In A Same-Sex Marriage

In Barrett v. Fontbonne Academy, (MA Super. Ct., Dec. 16, 2015), a Massachusetts state trial court held that a Catholic women's preparatory school unlawfully discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation and gender in violation of 21 MGL Chap. 151B when it withdrew an offer of employment as Food Services Director to Matthew Barrett after it discovered he was a spouse in a same-sex marriage.  The school said that same-sex marriage is inconsistent with the teachings of the Catholic Church.  In finding a statutory violation, the court rejected the school's argument that it came within the statutory exemption for religious organizations in Sec. 1(5) of the statute, because that exemption is limited to organizations that limit membership, enrollment, admission, or participation to members of the same religion. The court held that this limitation takes precedence over seemingly broader exemptive language for religious organizations in Sec. 4(18).  It also held that imposing these anti-discrimination provisions on the school did not violate the school's right of expressive association.  Finally the court rejected the school's reliance on the "ministerial exception" doctrine, concluding that Barrett would not be considered a minister "under any version of this doctrine." The Advocate reports on the decision.

DOE Exemptions From Title IX For Religious Colleges Is Growing

Earlier this month, The Column reported that in the last 18 months, the Department of Education has granted waivers to 27 religious colleges and universities in 17 states from the Department's interpretation of Title IX that bars schools receiving federal funds from discriminating against transgender students.  (See prior related posting.) Nine other schools have exemption applications pending. A number of these schools have sought and received even broader exemptions from Title IX based on the school's religious tenets.  For example in February the Department of Education granted a broad waiver to Anderson University:

The University is exempt from these provisions to the extent that they prohibit discrimination on the basis of marital status, sex outside of marriage, sexual orientation, gender identity, pregnancy, or abortion and compliance would conflict with the controlling organization’s religious tenets.

Christian advocacy groups are providing training and sample documents for schools to use in applying for exemptions. [Thanks to Religion Dispatches for the lead.]

Wheaton College Suspends Prof Over Statement In Solidarity With Muslims

Religion News Service yesterday reported on the controversy at Christian-affiliated Wheaton College which has placed political science professor Larycia Hawkins on administrative leave for a statement she made expressing solidarity with Muslims.  Hawkins, an Episcopalian, decided to wear a hijab during the Advent season leading up to Christmas as a statement of solidarity.  But the statement that potentially placed her job in jeopardy was a Facebook post reading:

I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book. And as Pope Francis stated last week, we worship the same God.

In a press release Tuesday, the Wheaton College administration said:

In response to significant questions regarding the theological implications of statements that Associate Professor of Political Science Dr. Larycia Hawkins has made about the relationship of Christianity to Islam, Wheaton College has placed her on administrative leave, pending the full review to which she is entitled as a tenured faculty member.

Wheaton College faculty and staff make a commitment to accept and model our institution's faith foundations with integrity, compassion and theological clarity. As they participate in various causes, it is essential that faculty and staff engage in and speak about public issues in ways that faithfully represent the College's evangelical Statement of Faith.

Historically Wheaton College, located in Illinois, while evangelical has not been fundamentalist in its outlook.  However the school has been one of the religious institutions at the center of the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate controversy. (See prior posting.)

Fired Atlanta Fire Chief Can Move Ahead With Retaliation and Religious Freedom Claims

In Cochran v. City of Atlanta, (ND GA, Dec. 16, 2015), a Georgia federal district court allowed the city of Atlanta's former fire chief, Kelvin Cochran-- who was also a deacon at his Baptist church-- to move ahead on many of his claims growing out of his termination after he self-published book which included statements that God intended marriage to exist exclusively between a man and a woman, and that homosexual conduct is immoral.  The court allowed Cochran to move ahead against the City of Atlanta on claims for retaliation, viewpoint discrimination, and freedom of expressive association. He was also permitted to move ahead against the city on his overbreadth and prior restraint challenge to a city ordinance requiring approval of the city's Board of Ethics before department heads may provide private services for remuneration. The court found that Mayor Kasim Reed, who was also a defendant, had qualified immunity as to these claims.  The court went on to permit plaintiff to proceed against the city and the Mayor on claims of denial of procedural due process, violation of his 1st Amendment free exercise and expressive association rights and of the Article VI ban on religious tests for office. The court dismissed Cochran's Establishment Clause claim, with leave to amend.  The court also dismissed his equal protection claims and his claims of vagueness and reputational injury.

Alliance Defending Freedom issued a press release announcing the decision. Washington Times reports on the decision.

Groups Question Walgreen's Project With Catholic Health Care Clinics

On Monday, a group of 19 advocacy organizations sent a letter (full text) to Walgreen Co. questioning the announced plans of Walgreen to partner with a Catholic health care system in opening clinics in 25 Walgreen's drug stores in Washington and Oregon. The letter, signed by groups such as the ACLU, Lambda Legal, NARAL and Planned Parenthood affiliates, said in part:

We appreciate Walgreens’s objective to provide customers with convenient access to basic health services. However, as Providence is a religious health system, we are very concerned that these clinics will limit patients’ access to important health services. Customers or patients who request services at these clinics or at Walgreens’s pharmacies are entitled to assurances that the services, information, and referrals they receive will not be restricted by religious doctrine.

As you are likely aware, Providence is a Catholic health care system that is required to follow the Ethical and Religious Directives (“ERDs”) promulgated by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. These directives forbid or severely restrict critical reproductive and end-of-life health care services at Catholic health facilities, including contraception, abortions, fertility treatments, vasectomies, tubal ligations, aid in dying,  and advance directives that are contrary to Catholic teachings. Some religious health systems also restrict the information and referrals that their health providers are allowed to give to patients. Adherence to the ERDs also increases the likelihood that LGBTQ individuals and their families will face discrimination in seeking to access health care services consistent with their medical needs.

Think Progress reported on the letter.

Supreme Court Stays Alabama Refusal To Recognize Georgia Adoption

On Monday in V.L. v. E.L., (Docket No. 15-648) the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay of an Alabama Supreme Court decision while it considers whether to grant certiorari in the case. (Order List, 12/14/2015.)  At issue is the Alabama Supreme Court's refusal to grant full faith and credit to a 2007 Georgia adoption decision involving a lesbian couple who were living together in Alabama as partners since 1995.  As reported by the Washington Post, one of the women, E.L., had three children conceived in 2002 and 2004 through donor insemination. The couple moved briefly to Georgia so that V.L. could obtain parental rights.  They then moved back to Alabama.  When the couple broke up in 2011, V.L. sought joint custody or visitation rights, but the Alabama Supreme Court refused holding that Georgia had violated its own laws in granting the initial adoption.  It held it need not recognize the adoption because the Georgia court lacked subject matter jurisdiction when it granted it.

Le Pen Acquitted On Hate Speech Charges

France 24 reports that Marie Le Pen, leader of France's far right National Front Party had hate speech charges against her dropped yesterday.  Le Pen was charged with "inciting discrimination, violence or hatred toward a group of people based on their religious beliefs" for the comments, which she made at a campaign rally in 2010.  The local prosecutor though asked for charges to be dropped because her comments "did not target all of the Muslim community."  At issue were Le Pen's remarks calling street prayers by Muslims in three French cities an "occupation of territory." The presiding judge said that Le Pen's comments, while shocking, were protected as freedom of expression-- a position supported by the French State Prosecutor. (See prior posting.)

Trial Court Rules In Factional Dispute In California Church

In a long-running case on remand from a California appellate court (see prior posting), a Los Angeles trial court judge yesterday entered a final judgment giving possession of the church and a commercial building it owns to one of the two competing factions in the St. Mary of the Angels Church in Los Feliz, California.  The Los Feliz Register reports that the court ruled in favor of Father Christopher Kelley and his followers.  An earlier Los Feliz Register report provided background:

Father Christopher Kelley—the rector from 2007 until his firing in 2012—and his supporters took sanctuary in the basement and celebrated mass, while the anti-Kelley faction used the church’s regular first floor offices and held mass in its tiny, but lovely chancel.

After three years and reams of legal documents filed by both sides with allegations hurled both ways, if you attended a mass today at weary St. Mary’s, you would be among only a dozen or so parishioners left from its once healthy congregation.

The dispute was complicated by the vote of the congregation's parishioners in 2012 to end affiliation with the Anglican Church and join the Catholic Church.  The losing faction in yesterday's decision said an appeal will be filed.

Cincinnati Enacts Conversion Therapy Ban

Last Wednesday, Cincinnati, Ohio followed four states and the District of Columbia in passing a ban on providing conversion therapy aimed at changing the sexual orientation of young people who are gay or lesbian. Cincinnati Enquirer reports that the new law imposes a $200 per day fine on violators. City Council passed the ordinance by a vote of 7-2 in the wake of the suicide death a year ago of a transgender teen who cited the conversion therapy she had been subjected to in her suicide note. During the comment period on the proposed ordinance, 21 people spoke against the bill on religious and free speech grounds.  One Baptist clergyman said: "This Council will create another another type of bondage for something people themselves have a right to seek liberty from."

Convicted Rabbi In "Coerced Get" Case Sentenced To 10 Years

In April, three defendants were convicted in federal district court in New Jersey on charges growing out of arrangements to abduct, beat and torture recalcitrant Jewish husbands who refused to give their civilly divorced wives a religious divorce document (get). (See prior posting.)  Yesterday the most prominent of those defendants, 70-year old Rabbi Mendel Epstein, was sentenced to ten years in prison for conspiracy to commit kidnapping.  A second defendant, Rabbi Binyamin Stimler, was sentenced to 39 months. As reported by AP, Rabbi Epstein told the sentencing judge: "Over the years, I guess, I got caught up in my tough-guy image. Truthfully, it helped me — the reputation — convince many of these reprobates to do the right thing."