City Recreation Department Trip To Biblical Museums Cancelled After Objections

Christian Post reports that the Charleston, Illinois parks and recreation department has cancelled a planned town trip to southern Ohio and northern Kentucky that included visits to the Answers in Genesis Creation Museum and Ark Encounter. Freedom From Religion Foundation had complained to the city (full text of letter) that promotion of visits to these museums violates the Establishment Clause because it endorses the religious mission of museum founder Ken Ham.

EU Encourages Member States To Increase Fight Against Antisemitism

As reported by JTA, the Council of the European Union yesterday adopted a Council Declaration on the fight against antisemitism and the development of a common security approach to better protect Jewish communities and institutions in Europe (full text). Described by the European Jewish Congress as "unprecedented," the Declaration sets out eight steps that member states are encouraged to take, including increasing their security efforts for Jewish communities, institutions and citizens. Among the other suggested steps are:

implement[ing] a holistic strategy to prevent and fight all forms of antisemitism as part of their strategies on preventing racism, xenophobia, radicalisation and violent extremism....

endors[ing] the non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism employed by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) as a useful guidance tool in education and training, including for law enforcement authorities in their efforts to identify and investigate antisemitic attacks....

Santa Fe Archdiocese Files Under Chapter 11

In a letter from Archbishop John Wester (full text) dated Nov. 29, the Catholic Archdiocese of Santa Fe (NM) announced that it is filing for Chapter 11 Reorganization order the federal Bankruptcy Code in order to deal with the growing number of clergy sexual abuse claims.  The letter says in part:

Given our desire to care for all victim survivors, and given the fact that we have settled over 300 claims, but that such claims continue to be filed, I see this as the wisest and most prudent course to take. It is very important that everyone understand that we have not taken this step to avoid responsibility. On the contrary, we firmly believe that Chapter 11 is the most merciful and equitable way for the Archdiocese to address its responsibility to the victim survivors, to continue to meet its commitment to prevent abuse, and to continue its mission to all those who depend on the outreach of the Church. 

The cost of settlement of the over 300 cases which included insurance funds totaled approximately $52 million dollars of which the Archdiocese paid a substantial amount. Currently we have approximately 40 pending cases, which we need to address in a caring and Christ-like manner.

AP has additional background.

Studies Conclude Atrocities Against Rohingya Constitute Genocide

On Monday, the Public International Law and Policy Group, a global pro bono law firm, issued a 105-page report (full text) titled Documenting Atrocity Crimes Committed Against the Rohingya In Myanmar's Rakhine State. Here is an exceprt:

In March and April 2018, the Public International Law & Policy Group (PILPG), undertook an as yet unprecedented large-scale and comprehensive human rights documentation investigation mission in the refugee camps and settlement areas in Eastern Bangladesh. The purpose of this investigation mission was to provide an accurate accounting of the patterns of abuse and atrocity crimes perpetrated against the Rohingya in Myanmar’s Rakhine State and to help inform the policy decisions related to accountability in Myanmar....

Following its investigation mission, and with substantial support from an array of international attorneys and international criminal law experts, PILPG conducted a comprehensive legal analysis of the investigation’s factual findings....

The investigation mission documented a range of crimes amounting to crimes against humanity, including the particularly prevalent crimes of extermination, murder, rape and other forms of sexual violence, enslavement, forcible transfer, and persecution.... 

With regard to the crime of genocide, this Report concludes that there are reasonable grounds to believe that genocide was committed against the Rohingya in Myanmar’s northern Rakhine State....

Finally, this Report concludes that there are reasonable grounds to believe that war crimes were committed in relation to abuses and violence committed against the Rohingya in northern Rakhine State.....

The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, citing other studies, also issued a statement (full text) reaching a similar conclusion. Politico reports that the U.S. House of Representatives is expected to pass H. Res. 1091 expressing the sense of the House that genocide and crimes against humanity have been committed.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Says Names of 11 Priests Should Be Redacted From Grand Jury Report

In In re: Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury, (PA Sup. Ct., Dec. 3, 2018), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in a 6-1 decision held that because of insufficient due process protections, the names of 11 priests petitioning the court should be redacted permanently from the publicly released grand jury report on sexual misconduct by Catholic clergy. The majority said in part:

... [T]he supervising judge’s limited review and approval of a grand jury report for public release gives it an imprimatur of official government sanction which carries great weight in the eyes of the public, and, thus, may compound the harm to a person’s reputation who is wrongly named therein. As such, we ordered the temporary redaction of Report 1 while we addressed the challenges to it. In the absence of any other viable remedy, we are compelled to find that these  redactions, with respect to Petitioners, must be made permanent.

We acknowledge that this outcome may be unsatisfying to the public and to the victims of the abuse detailed in the report. While we understand and empathize with these perspectives, constitutional rights are of the highest order, and even alleged sexual abusers, or those abetting them, are guaranteed by our Commonwealth’s Constitution the right of due process. It is the unfortunate reality that the Investigating Grand Jury Act fails to secure this right, creating a substantial risk that Petitioners’ reputations will be irreparably and illegitimately impugned....

Justice Baer filed a concurring opinion. Justice Dougherty also filed a concurring opinion, setting out procedures which he believes would provide adequate due process. Chief Justice Saylor dissented (full text), arguing that petitioners should be provided hearings (and an opportunity to testify, if they did not do so before the grand jury) before a judicial officer at which they are "provided the opportunity to advocate that the grand jury’s particularized findings of criminal and/or morally reprehensible conduct are not supported by a preponderance of the evidence." Philadelphia Tribune reports on the decision.

California City Settles Officer's Religious Discrimination Suit Against Police Chief For $2.3M

AP reports that last Friday the city of Beverly Hills, California agreed to pay $2.3 million to settle a religious discrimination lawsuit brought against it by Police Capt. Mark Rosen.  Rosen, who is Jewish, contends that Police Chief Sandra Spagnoli, through restructuring of the command staff, denied him opportunities for promotion because of his religion.  At least 20 other complaints of discrimination of various sorts have been filed against Chief Spagnoli since 2016. Rosen retired immediately after the suit was settled.

Religious Leaders Write On Religious Freedom Prospects Ahead

Deseret News on Monday posted an article titled What's next for religious freedom in 2019? Faith leaders and policymakers weigh in. The article features short essays from seven religious leaders of different faiths.

Guidance On Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Published By European Commission

The European Commission has published a Guidance Note dated November 2018 (full text) to assist member states of the European Union in enforcing national laws banning hate crimes and hate speech. The Note is designed to facilitate application of a 2008 Council of Europe Decision on Combating Racism and Xenophobia. The Note was compiled by an EU High Level Group created in 2016. [Thanks to Law & Religion UK for the lead.]

Congress Passes Bill Aimed At Prosecuting Iraq and Syria Genocide

Last week, Congress gave final passage to HR 390, the Iraq and Syria Genocide Relief and Accountability Act (full text). The bill now awaits President Trump's signature. The Act provides in part:

Sec. 4... It is the policy of the United States to ensure that assistance for humanitarian, stabilization, and recovery needs of individuals who are or were nationals and residents of Iraq or Syria ... is directed toward those ... with the greatest need, including those ... from communities of religious and ethnic minorities ... that .... have been identified as being at risk of persecution, forced migration, genocide, crimes against humanity, or war crimes.

Sec.5.... The Secretary of State and [USAID] ... are authorized to provide assistance ... to support the efforts of entities, including nongovernmental organizations with expertise in international criminal investigations and law, to address genocide, crimes against humanity, or war crimes ... by ISIS in Iraq....

Sec. 7... Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that includes—... (2) an assessment of— (A) the feasibility and advisability of prosecuting ISIS members for whom credible  evidence exists of having committed genocide, crimes against humanity, or war crimes in Iraq, including in domestic courts in Iraq, hybrid courts, and internationalized domestic courts; and (B) the measures needed— (i) to ensure effective criminal investigations of such individuals....

[Thanks to Blog from the Capital for the lead.]

Religious Opposition To Furnishing Social Security Number Fails

In Ricks v. State of Idaho Contractors Board, (ID App., Dec. 3, 2018), an Idaho appeals court dismissed free exercise challenges to the state's requirement that an applicant for a contractor's license furnish his Social Security number.  Federal child support enforcement laws require states to collect Social Security numbers as part of applications for professional licenses if the state wishes to be eligible for certain federal grants.  George Ricks refused to furnish his Social Security number because of his religious belief that Social Security numbers are a form of the Biblical "mark of the beast."

The court rejected on pre-emption grounds Ricks argument that the requirement violates Idaho's Free Exercise of Religion Protected Act (FERPA):

 [T]he operation of FERPA, in the context of the cooperative endeavor between Congress and the Idaho Legislature, does impede 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(13)’s objective of improving child support enforcement effectiveness by exempting individuals from I.C. § 73-122’s and I.C. § 54-5210’s requirement of providing social security numbers on professional license applications. In other words, an exemption granted by FERPA would make it more difficult to locate a parent who may have outstanding child support obligations through the Federal Parent Locator Service database. Because this amounts to a direct conflict with Congress’s intent in passing 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(13), 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(13) preempts FERPA in this context.

The court rejected Ricks' federal RFRA argument because no federal defendant was named. Finally it rejected his First Amendment and state constitution free exercise claims finding that the laws at issue are neutral laws of general applicability. The court also released a summary statement of its holding.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Richard W. Garnett, 'There Are No Ordinary People': Christian Humanism and Christian Legal Thought, (56 J. Cath. Leg. Stud. 77 (2017)).
• Kevin M. Barry, The Death Penalty & The Fundamental Right to Life,(November 20, 2018).
• Tarunabh Khaitan & Jane Calderwood Norton, The Right to Freedom of Religion and the Right against Religious Discrimination: Theoretical Distinctions, (Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper (Oct. 2018)).
• Tarunabh Khaitan & Jane Calderwood Norton, Religion in Human Rights Law: A Normative Restatement, (Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper (Oct. 2018)).
• Robin Fretwell Wilson & Shaakirrah Sanders, By Faith Alone: When Religious Beliefs and Child Welfare Collide, (Chapter in: The Contested Place of Religion in Family Law, May 2018, Cambridge University Press).
• Perry Dane, Corporations, (Routledge Companion to Economic Theology, Forthcoming).
• David L. Hudson, Justice Kennedy and the First Amendment, (9 HLRe 49 (2019)).
• David Eliot Bernstein, The Boundaries of Antidiscrimination Laws, (George Mason University Legal Studies Research Paper No. LS 18-34 (2018)).

From SSRN (Non-U.S. Law):

• Yudhanjaya Wijeratne, The Control of Hate Speech on Social Media: Lessons from Sri Lanka, (CPR South, 2018, Policy Brief).
• Mohammad Fadel, Modern Islamic International Law between Accommodation and Resistance: The Case of Israel and BDS, (19 Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law (2016-2017), pp. 247-78 (December 13, 2018, Forthcoming).
• Kyriaki Pavlidou, Religious Expression in the Workplace Before the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union: Discriminating Against a Fundamental Right?, (Applying Non-Discrimination Law, Goulas D. and Kofinis St. (eds.), Hellenic League for Human Rights, Thessaloniki, 2018, pp. 146-193).
• Tarunabh Khaitan, Discrimination, (Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law, 2017).

President Trump's Hanukkah Message

Yesterday the White House issued a Presidential Message on Hanukkah which in part connects the holiday that began yesterday evening with recent events;

For eight nights, Jewish families and friends will come together to engage in the lighting of the menorah.  This special tradition started more than 2,000 years ago during the rededication of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem, which followed a trying period when Jews were persecuted for practicing their faith.

Unfortunately, Jews today continue to face many different forms of violence, hatred, and bigotry around the globe.  We remember all those from the Tree of Life—Or L’Simcha Congregation—whose lives were tragically taken in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, this past October.  As one Nation, we pledge our continued love and support for the victims, their families, and the community, and we pray that the victims’ families find some measure of peace and comfort during this holiday season.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Jannisch v. Bates, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199718 (D MY, Nov. 26. 2018), a Montana federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200612, Aug. 27, 2018) and dismissed a Native American inmate's complaint regarding confiscation and destruction of his religious property.

In Salas v. Ducart, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 199724 (ND CA, Nov. 26, 2018), a California federal district court allowed a Jewish inmate to move ahead with complaint regarding the availability of kosher meals, religious meal ceremonies and a Seder meal.

In Vann v. Griffin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201577 (SD NY, Nov. 28, 2018), a New York federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that correctional officers on five occasions interfered with his religious practice by touching his Santeria beads, crushing his cigar, looking through his religious pouches, or desecrating his religious objects.

In Alsaifullah v. State of New York, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8141 (NY App. Div., Nov. 29, 2018), a New York state appeals court held that the Court of Claims properly dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was deprived of meals for two holy days.

In Bybee v. Monroe County Detention Facilities, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202452 (SD FL, Nov. 28, 2018), a Florida federal magistrate judge recommended denying a temporary restraining order to an inmate complaining about access to kosher food.

Another Contraceptive Coverage Mandate Case Is Settled

Another of the challenges by religious non-profits to the Obama administration's Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage mandate has been disposed of by the courts.  The Trump administration has expanded the exemption available for those with religious or moral objections to the mandate and numerous of the cases have already been, with the acquiescence of the government, decided in favor of the objectors. In the latest, the 11th Circuit has issued an order (full text) in Eternal Word Television Network, Inc. v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (11th Cir., Nov. 29, 2018), vacating the district court's order granting partial summary judgment to defendants and remanding the case.  As explained in a press release from ETWN:

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Zubik, the Court of Appeals vacated its own negative order against EWTN on May 31, 2016.  The court’s order asked for further briefing on the matter while the parties worked toward a settlement. 

Attorneys for EWTN and the Department of Justice negotiated terms of a settlement under which the government agreed not to enforce the contraceptive mandate against the network, and that EWTN would ask the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to vacate the District Court’s decision. The 11th Circuit granted that request on Nov. 29.

New York Issues Regulations For Review Of Religious Schools' Curricula

On Nov. 20, the New York State Education Department issued guidelines for Substantial Equivalency Review of the curriculum of non-public religious and independent schools (full text), along with related materials.  As reported by The Forward:

The regulations come years into a growing controversy over whether New York’s Hasidic yeshivas are providing education that is substantially equivalent to that offered in public schools, as is required by state law....

The guidelines ... are based on a controversial law passed as part of last summer’s budget deal.... The new law says that the state education commissioner, rather than local school districts, will determine equivalency for schools that meet certain criteria that were drawn only to include Hasidic yeshivas.

(See prior related posting.)

Should Japanese Government Pay For Shinto Royal Rites?

The Telegraph reports:

Prince Akishino, the younger son of Japan’s Emperor Akihito, has stirred controversy by suggesting that the state should not cover the cost of a Shinto religious ritual for his older brother’s accession to the Chrysanthemum Throne next year....

Instead, he said the cost of the Daijosai rite in November should come directly from the imperial family’s funds.....

Under the terms of the constitution, the government is not permitted to engage in religious activities and there are some, apparently including the prince, who believe that the government paying for the two-day Shinto Daijosai ritual runs contrary to those rules.

Hasidic Jewish School Sues For Right To Expand

A lawsuit was filed this week in a New York federal district court against the Village of Airmont charging that the village and its school board are engaged in a coordinated effort to prevent the local Hasidic Jewish community from expanding a religious school which operates on a 21-acre piece of land.  The 75-page complaint (full text) in Central UTA of Monsey v. Village of Airmont, New York, (SD NY, filed 11/28/2018), claims violations of RLUIPA, the 1st and 14th Amendments and the New York state constitution, contending:

Village officials have attempted to place a cap on the total number of Hasidic Jewish children that may be educated at Central UTA's Hasidic Jewish religious school, angry protesters have prevented a meeting of the Planning Board to consider Central UTA's application to build two new school buildings from occurring, and Village officials' political campaign advertisements paint an apocalyptic picture of what will happen if their opponents who support the rights of the Hasidic Jewish community are elected....

Defendants are using their political policymaking and enforcement authority to use the Village's zoning laws and ordinances to prevent and dissuade Hasidic Jews from joining their community and denying those families that have moved to the area their rights to school services that are guaranteed under the law.

First Liberty issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit.

Hopi Tribe Loses Public Nuisance Challenge To Snowbowl Expansion

In Hopi Tribe v. Arizona Snowbowl Resort Limited Partnership, (AZ Sup. Ct., Nov. 29, 2018), the Arizona Supreme Court in a 5-2 decision, rejected the Hopi Tribe's attempt to invoke public nuisance law to challenge the sale of wastewater to make artificial snow at a ski resort on federal land.  The land has been traditionally used by the Hopi for religious and ceremonial purposes.  Under Arizona law, a private party can challenge a public nuisance only if the party can show special injury different from that suffered by the public at large. In the latest chapter of the Hopi's long-running attempt to challenge the Snowbowl expansion, the majority held that environmental damage to public land with religious, cultural, or emotional significance to the tribe is not enough to create "special injury." The majority said in part:

because a particular place’s religious importance is inherently subjective, ... courts are ill-equipped to determine whether “one form of incidental interference with an individual’s spiritual activities” should be analyzed differently from that of another....

At its core, the special injury requirement serves a gatekeeping function that prevents courts from deciding issues under the guise of public nuisance claims when such issues are best left to public officials, a pivotal principle in federal cases grappling with religious freedom challenges to public land uses.

Chief Justice Bales, joined by Justice Bolick, dissented, saying in part:

[T]he Hopi face the destruction and desecration of some of their most sacred locations and practices. This is the harm that the majority claims is no different than that suffered by the public at large.... But the general public does not have millennia of religious practice in the area that will be covered in a fine film of reclaimed sewage. Nor does the general public have rights of access and use - rooted in Hopi tradition and cultural practices - recognized by federal statutes.

Arizona Republic reports on the decision.

Suits Proliferating Against Airbnb Over West Bank Delistings

Lawsuits are proliferating against Airbnb for its decision last week to delist rentals in Israeli settlements in the West Bank.  In addition to the arbitration proceeding previously reported, a suit under the federal Fair Housing Act was filed in Delaware federal district court. Delaware is Airbnb's state of incorporation. (Reuters). According to JTA, the 18 plaintiffs in the lawsuit either own property in Israel or have rented property there in the past through Airbnb. Separately a suit was filed against Airbnb in an Israeli court alleging discrimination in violation of Israeli law, and a separate suit in Israeli courts against Human Rights Watch for its involvement in Airbnb's action is in the offing. (JTA).

Appeals Court Vacates Invalidation of California's Assisted Suicide Law

In People ex rel Becerra v. Superior Court of Riverside County, (CA App., Nov. 27, 2018), a California state appellate court issued a writ of mandate ordering the trial court to vacate its decision striking down California's End of Life Option Act.  The Act legalizes physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill.  The trial court had held that the Act was outside the scope of the proclamation calling the special session of the legislature that passed it.  The majority in the appellate court held that plaintiffs-- doctors and a Christian medical society-- lack standing to bring the challenge.  Judge Slough, dissenting in part, argued that the court should reach the merits of the challenge to the law and should hold that the law was constitutionally enacted.  Courthouse News Service reports on the decision.