Conversion Therapy Ban Challenged In Maryland, Enacted In New York

The Baltimore Sun reports that a lawsuit was filed in Maryland federal district court on Friday challenging Maryland's ban on conversion therapy for minors.  Plaintiff Christopher Doyle contends that the ban violates his free speech and free exercise rights, as well as his clients' right "to prioritize their religious and moral values above unwanted same-sex sexual attractions, behaviors, or identities."

Meanwhile, on Jan. 15, the New York state legislature gave final passage to A00576 (full text) which prohibits  mental health  professionals  from  engaging  in  sexual  orientation  change efforts with patients under the age of eighteen. NBC News says that Gov. Andrew Cuomo is expected to promptly sign the bill.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Sterling v. Sellers, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 1522 (11th Cir., Jan. 16, 2019), the 11th Circuit refused to allow a previously litigious inmate to proceed without paying a filing fee under the imminent danger exception. The inmate alleged that prison officials use physical force against Muslims to stop their congregate prayers in dorms.

In Blankumsee v. Foxwell, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4574 (D MD, Jan. 10, 2019), a Maryland federal district court dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies a complaint by a Christian inmate that serving him turkey sausages made with pork stock violated his religious beliefs.

In Bell v. English, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5425 (D KA, Jan. 11, 2019), a Kansas federal district court gave an inmate 3 weeks to show cause not to dismiss his complaint that he was without his Bible for 3 days after a search.

In Dayton v. Lisenbee, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5435 (ED MO, Jan. 11, 2019), a Missouri federal district court held that there is no constitutional requirement that a jail create religious services for prisoners, at least in the absence of a demand for particular religious services or an allegation that group services are the only meaningful way for an inmate to practice his religion.

In Scales v. Walker, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9055 (WD WI, Jan. 18, 2019), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that his free exercise and other rights were infringed when a correctional officer attempted to serve him a waffle that had dropped on the floor and refused to replace his Kosher meal when plaintiff learned what had happened.

School Board Votes To End Appeals of Board Prayer Policy Decision

As previously reported, last month the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, over a number of dissenting views, denied en banc review in Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education. In the case, a 3-judge panel applied the Lemon test to strike down a California school board's prayer policy for board meetings. Now, according to the Chino Champion, on Thursday with two new board members voting, the Board voted 3-2 to end all appeals of the decision. One of the new Board members voting with the majority works as a 1st Amendment lawyer.

Claim of Religious Targeting Against Child Welfare Worker Dismissed

In Glasser v. McCumbers, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7541 (SD WV, Jan 15, 2019), a West Virginia federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219514, Nov. 30, 2018) and dismissed a suit against a Child Protective Services worker.  Plaintiff, whose child was removed from his custody, alleged that he was was subjected to an Abuse and Neglect charge in part because of the contempt for which the CPS worker Melissa McCumbers held his religious communal living conditions.  The court concluded that McCumbers failed to establish a substantial burden on the exercise of his religion.

Anti-Semitism Concerns Surround Tomorrows Third Women's March

Tomorrow the third annual Women's March is scheduled in a number of cities around the country.  But as reported by Vox, concerns about anti-Semitism surround some leaders of the movement and has led to the withdrawal of sponsorship by groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center and, apparently, the Democratic National Committee:

[T]his year, the leaders of Women’s March Inc. — one of the organizations that grew out of the original march, and the most visible public face of the march today — are facing calls to step down. The reasons include criticisms of their association with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and allegations that they made anti-Semitic remarks in planning meetings.

Women’s March Inc. is a national organization led by four activists from New York City — Tamika Mallory, Linda Sarsour, Carmen Perez, and Bob Bland — who helped organize the first march in Washington, DC, in 2017. The group also has local chapters that are planning marches in cities around the country this year, though other local marches are not affiliated with Women’s March Inc.

Fired Employee Loses Suit Over Religious Content of His E-Mail Signature Block

In Sioux City, Iowa on Wednesday, a federal trial court jury rejected a claim by plaintiff who had been hired as a psychiatric security specialist that his firing during his probationary period violated his free speech and free exercise rights.  As reported by the Sioux City Journal, plaintiff Michael Mial pointed to the request by his supervisors at a state sex-offender civil commitment unit that he stop using "In Christ" in his personalized signature block on internal e-mails sent to other employees.

Senate Resolution Says "No Religious Test" Clause Bars Disqualification For K of C Membership

On Wednesday, the U.S. Senate passed Senate Resolution 19 by unanimous consent.  The Resolution was introduced by Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse in response to questions raised in connection with last month's Judiciary Committee hearing on the nomination of Brian C. Buescher for a seat on the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. At that hearing, Senators Mazie Hirono (D-HI) and Kamala Harris (D-CA) questioned whether Buescher's membership in the Knights of Columbus would bias his consideration on issues such as abortion rights and same-sex marriage. (Background). Resolution 19 after a lengthy Preamble, provides:

That it is the sense of the Senate that disqualifying a nominee to Federal office on the basis of membership in the Knights of Columbus violates clause 3 of article VI of the Constitution of the United States, which establishes that Senators ‘‘shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support th[e] Constitution’’ and ‘‘no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States’’.

National Catholic Register reports on the Resolution.

Court Says Fair Housing Act Does Not Bar Sexual Orientation Discrimination

In Walsh v. Friendship Village of South County, (ED MO, Jan. 16. 2019), a Missouri federal district court, relying on a 1989 decision by the 8th Circuit under Title VII, held that sexual orientation discrimination is not covered by the federal Fair Housing Act. At issue was the refusal, on religious grounds, of a senior living community to rent an apartment to a married lesbian couple. Courthouse News Service reports on the decision.

Challenge To NY Favoritism of Yeshivas Dismissed For Lack of Standing.

In Young Advocates for Fair Education v. Cuomo, (ED NY, Jan. 16, 2019), New York federal district court dismissed for lack of standing and ripeness a challenge to the constitutionality of the "Felder Amendment" which plaintiff claims was designed to reduce the level of secular education that needs to be offered by Hasidic Jewish schools in New York. Plaintiffs alleged that the Felder Amendment creates an unconstitutional preference for Hasidic Jewish schools. While not reaching the merits, the court suggested that state regulations may have made standards for religious schools more rigid. Yeshiva World reports on the decision.

Florida Jury Gives Large Award To Worker Fired For Refusing To Work on Sunday

Law 360 reports [subscription required] that a Florida federal court jury on Monday awarded $36,000 for lost wages, $500,000 for emotional pain and $21 million in punitive damages to a Hilton Hotel dishwasher who was fired for swapping shifts with co-workers to allow her to have Sundays off for religious reasons.  Plaintiff was a member of the Catholic missionary group, Soldiers of Christ Church.  Florida has a statutory cap on damages which will lead to the court's reducing punitive damages. [Thanks to Douglas Laycock via Religionlaw for the lead.]

Jan. 16 Is Religious Freedom Day

Today (Jan. 16) is Religious Freedom Day-- the 233rd anniversary of the enactment of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. On Tuesday, President Trump issued a Presidential Proclamation calling on Americans "to commemorate this day with events and activities that remind us of our shared heritage of religious liberty and that teach us how to secure this blessing both at home and around the world."  The Proclamation says in part:

Unfortunately, the fundamental human right to religious freedom is under attack.  Efforts to circumscribe religious freedom — or to separate it from adjoining civil liberties, like property rights or free speech — are on the rise.  Over time, legislative and political attacks on religious freedom have given way to actual violence.  Last October, we witnessed a horrific attack on the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania — the deadliest attack on the Jewish community in our Nation’s history.  Tragically, attacks on people of faith and their houses of worship have increased in frequency in recent years.

European Court Upholds Removal of Children From Home Schooling

In Wunderlich v. Germany, (ECHR, Jan. 10, 2019), the European Court of Human Rights in a Chamber Judgment upheld Germany's three-week removal of four children from their parents' home after the parents insisted on home schooling them and refused to send them to state schools.  The court held that there was no violation of Art. 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Right to Respect for Private and Family Life). the Court said in part:

The Court finds that the enforcement of compulsory school attendance, to prevent social isolation of the applicants’ children and ensure their integration into society, was a relevant reason for justifying the partial withdrawal of parental authority. It further finds that the domestic authorities reasonably assumed – based on the information available to them – that children were endangered by the applicants by not sending them to school and keeping them in a “symbiotic” family system.

ADF issued a press release announcing the decision.

Popularity of Kosher Food Requests In Prisons

Tablet Magazine yesterday reports on the surprising popularity of kosher food requests in prisons, saying in part:

According to the 2013 numbers, Jews are seven percent of the state prison population of New York; the fourth largest religious denomination after Protestant, Catholic and Muslim (in that order). If the numbers were accurate it would mean that nearly twice as many Jews were locked up that year as members of the Nation of Islam. But the truth is that many inmates lie and claim to be Jewish once they enter the prison system. And why do they do it? Not as a hedge against the impending arrival of the Moshiach. They do it for the kosher food.

Court Enjoins Broadened Contraceptive Mandate Exemptions

Yesterday in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Trump, (ED PA, Jan 14, 2019), a Pennsylvania federal district court issued a nationwide preliminary injunction preventing enforcement of the Trump Administration's expanded exemptions for those asserting religious or moral objections to the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive coverage mandate.  In addition to finding procedural problems in the way the rules were adopted, the court concluded:

The Final Rules—just as the IFRs before them—exceed the scope of the Agencies’ authority under the ACA, and, further, cannot be justified under RFRA.

A California court issued a similar, but more limited injunction on Sunday. (See prior posting.) Washington Examiner reports on the decision.

Ohio Governor Signs Broad State Employment Non-Discrimination Executive Order

Yesterday, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine signed Executive Order 2019-05D prohibiting discrimination by any state agency, board or commission.  The Order prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, gender identity or expression, national origin (ancestry), military status (past, present or future), disability, age (40 years or older), status as a parent during pregnancy and immediately after the birth of a child, status as a parent of a young child, status as a foster parent, genetic information, or sexual orientation. Washington Blade reports on the governor's action, saying in part:

DeWine’s action stands in contrast to the executive order signed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who excluded LGBT people in a non-discrimination that included other categories, including race, religion and sex....

The Ohio Republican’s action may come as a surprise to observers who know his history as a President Trump-supported candidate and an Ohio state attorney general who defended the state’s marriage ban in court.

Expanded Religious and Moral Exemptions From Contraceptive Mandate Enjoined In Part of the Country

In State of California v. Health and Human Services, (ND CA, Jan. 13, 2019), a California federal district court granted a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the the Trump Administration's broadened religious and moral exemptions from the ACA's contraceptive coverage mandate. The court enjoined enforcement of the Final Rules that were scheduled to take effect today, but only in  the 13 states and the District of Columbia that are plaintiffs in the case.  The court concluded that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their claim that the exemptions are inconsistent with the Women's Health Amendment, and that the religious exemption is likely not required by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The court agreed with decisions in nine Courts of Appeal that the Obama Administration accommodation for religious objectors does not impose a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion. Politico reports on the decision.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Ahmed E. Taha &Sohaib Khan, Charity Disparity: The Challenge of Applying Religious Law on Zakat in the United States, (Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2018).
• Michael A. Helfand, From Doctrine to Devotion: The Jewish Comparative Law Project, (American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 67, 2019 Forthcoming).
• Fajiri Muhammadin & Thara Wahab, Fiqh al-Jihād in Modern Warfare: Analyzing Prospects and Challenges with Reference to International Humanitarian Law, (IIUM Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2018)).
• Wayne Barnes, Reconsidering Christianity as a Support for Secular Law: A Final Reply to Professor Calhoun, (Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper (2019)).
• David L. Sloss & Wayne Sandholtz, Universal Human Rights and Constitutional Change, (William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Forthcoming).
• Daniel Bewel, The Murder of My Unborn Siblings: A Breach of the Constitutional Right to Life of the Unborn, (August 15, 2018).
• Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. Wade's Two Oral Arguments, (49 Seton Hall L. Rev. 307 (2018)).
• Md.Salman Sohel, The Rohingya Crisis in Myanmar: Origin and Emergence, (Saudi J. Humanities Soc. Sci.; Vol-2, Iss-11A (Nov, 2017)).
• Zubair Abbasi, From Faskh to Khula: Transformation of Muslim Women’s Right to Divorce in Pakistan (1947-2017), (December 29, 2018).

From SmartCILP:

• Omri Ben-Zvi, The Unavailability of Religious Arguments, 54 Idaho Law Review 703-728 (2018).
• Frederick B. Jonassen, The "Ave Maria" Effect, 54 Idaho Law Review 729-811 (2018).
• Islamic Law, Society, and the State. Introduction by Tamir Moustafa, Jeffrey Adam Sachs; articles by Mona Oraby, Katherine Lemons, Jeffrey Adam Sachs, Michael G. Peletz, Tamir Moustafa. 52 Law & Society Review 560-708 (2018).
• Cesar Arjona & Greg Jehle, Islamic Law and the Limits of Amorality: Reconceptualizing the Legal Ethics of Transnational Islamic Finance, [Abstract], 27 Transnational Law Contemporary Problems 249-275 (2018).
• Religious Freedom. Articles by Robin Fretwell Wilson, David Orentlicher, Shaakirrah R. Sanders, David M. Smolin, Allison M. Whelan. 8 UC Irvine Law Review 583-759 (2018).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Carr v. Zwally, (10th Cir., Jan. 8, 2019), the 10th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's complaint that a sheriff's deputy removed religious material, including two Bibles, from his cell.

In Anderson v. Dzurenda, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 784 (D NV, Jan. 3, 2019), a Nevada federal district court allowed a Wiccan inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was denied religious items, religious oils and religious teas.

In Williams v. Kobayashi, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1015 (D HI, Jan. 3, 2019), an Hawaii federal district court dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that his personal minister's application for special visitor status was denied.

In Lopez v. Semple, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1361 (D CT, Jan. 4, 2019), a Connecticut federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that he was deprived of religious services while in segregation.

In Wilson v. Arizona, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1744 (D AZ, Jan. 3, 2019), an Arizona federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was denied religious meals and that his food was tampered with because of his religion.

In Canada v. Stirling, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3004 (D SC, Jan. 8, 2019), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218699, Dec. 17, 2018) and dismissed an inmate's claim that playing the Pledge of Allegiance over the prison loudspeaker two to three times per day violated the Establishment Clause.

In Wilcox v. Brown, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3684 (WD NC, Jan. 9, 2019),a North Carolina federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his damage claim for the temporary cancellation of Rastafarian religious services.

10th Circuit: Church of the Creator Does Not Qualify As A "Religion"

In Hale v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (10th Cir., Jan. 7, 2019), the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a prisoner free exercise case, held that the white supremacist Church of the Creator does not qualify as a "religion".  Thus the protections of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act do not apply to claims of an inmate whose participation in Creativity was limited because of its designation as a security threat group. The court applied a 5-factor test set out in earlier cases to determine whether Creativity was a religious belief system.  The court said in part:

Instead of addressing existential, teleological, or cosmological matters, Creativity presents only a singular concern of racial dominance, framed in terms of social, political, and ideological struggles. Thus, Creativity does not address ultimate ideas.

Pakistan's Supreme Court Orders Government Compensation To Victims of Protesters

As previously reported, after Pakistan's Supreme Court last October reversed the blasphemy conviction of a Christian woman, Asia Bibi, protests and demonstrations broke out in several Pakistani cities.  Now, according to Geo News, Pakistan's Supreme Court today ordered federal and provincial governments to pay compensation to those who suffered losses and property damage during the three day countrywide protest that followed the October decision.