Donald Trump's Christmas Card Covers All Bases

The New York Daily News reports that the Christmas card which Donald Trump mailed to his supporters this week covered all the bases after his campaign emphasis on the need to say Merry Christmas instead of "Happy Holidays."

From the White House For Christmas: Playlists and Concern For Persecuted Christians

On Wednesday, in anticipation of Christmas, the White House posted The Obamas' and Bidens' Holiday Playlists on the White House Spotify channel.  The Obamas' number one pick is "O Tannenbaum, Vince Guaraldi Trio (A Charlie Brown Christmas)," while "Santa Claus is Comin’ to Town, Bruce Springsteen" tops the Bidens' playlist.

The President also posted a more serious statement on Persecuted Christians at Christmas, saying in part:

At this time, those of us fortunate enough to live in countries that honor the birthright of all people to practice their faith freely give thanks for that blessing.  Michelle and I are also ever-mindful that many of our fellow Christians do not enjoy that right, and hold especially close to our hearts and minds those who have been driven from their ancient homelands by unspeakable violence and persecution.

In some areas of the Middle East where church bells have rung for centuries on Christmas Day, this year they will be silent; this silence bears tragic witness to the brutal atrocities committed against these communities by ISIL.

NYC Taxi Appeals Unit Says Religious Belief of Driver Does Not Justify Gender Discrimiination

Triggered by a New York Post article, a number of media outlets last week reported on a Sept. 3, 2015 decision of the New York City OATH Taxi and Limousine Tribunal Appeals Unit.  In Taxi & Limousine Commission v. Tamsir Drammeh , the Appeals Unit upheld a hearing officer's decision that a Muslim cab driver violated a Commission rule prohibiting any action that is "against the best interest of the public" when he refused to transport a female passenger in the front seat of his cab for religious reasons. When a family of four hailed the cab, the driver told them that all four could sit in back, or the husband could sit in front, but the wife could not. The Hearing Examiner concluded: "That his religion did not allow him to sit next to a woman is not an acceptable defense in an occupation that is operated to serve the public." Affirming that decision, the Appeals Unit stated:

There is strong public policy which prohibits a TLC licensee from engaging in “invidious discrimination while serving the public” .... In addition, it is well established that a taxicab driver is required to possess sufficient self-restraint to deal in a mature fashion with the everyday conflicts inherent in his job.... This includes a situation where the driver’s religious beliefs may conflict with his obligations and duties as a taxi driver to transport members of the public.

Here, the respondent’s determination that it would be proper for the passenger’s husband to sit in the front seat, but not proper for the passenger to do so solely because of her gender, evidenced a discriminatory attitude and constituted an action against the best interests of the public.

The cabbie was fined $350 and suspended for one day.

Illinois Nuns Sue To Challenge Zoning Denial

A federal lawsuit was filed last week by an order of Catholic nuns to challenge the denial of a conditional use permit by McHenry County, Illinois. Fraternité Notre Dame already has a monastery, church, seminary, convent, retreat center, bakery, printing press and cemetery on its 95 acres of property. It now wants to add a barn in order to build a commercial kitchen, process grapes and brew beer.  It also wants to add a school with attached dormitory; nursing home with hospice services; and gift shop and tasting area to sell pastries, religious and inspirational articles, and its own wine and beer. The complaint (full text) in Fraternité Notre Dame, Inc. v. County of McHenry, (ND IL, filed 12/16/2015), contends that the denial of zoning approval violates RLUIPA as well as the equal protection clauses of the Illinois and federal constitutions.  Northwest Herald reports on the lawsuit.

Proposed Bill In New Mexico Would Amend RFRA To Protect Religiously- Based LGBT Discrimination

While New Mexico already has a Religious Freedom Restoration Act, last week two legislators pre-filed a bill for the new session that would expand the state's RFRA to permit businesses to refuse to conduct business with gay, lesbian and transgender individuals where the business has religious objections to doing so. Think Progress reports that the new House Bill 55, while prohibiting businesses from using religion to justify racial or gender discrimination, does not prohibit using religion to justify LGBT discrimination.  The Bill provides:

Nothing contained in the Human Rights Act shall ... burden a person's free exercise of religion by requiring the person to provide a service or to conduct business in a manner inconsistent with adherence to that person's sincerely held religious belief unless that adherence is based on race, age, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, physical or mental handicap or serious medical condition. 

Pennsylvania Appeals Court Orders New Trial For Msgr. Lynn On Priest Abuse Cover-Up

In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Lynn, (PA Super. Ct., Dec. 22, 2015), in a 2-1 decision, a Pennsylvania state appeals court vacated the 2012 conviction of Msgr. William J. Lynn who was the first U.S. priest criminally convicted of covering up sexual molestation of minors by another priest. (See prior posting.) The case was remanded for a new trial.  In the case, which was already on remand from the state Supreme Court (see prior posting), the majority concluded that while prior bad acts can be introduced into evidence to show elements such as knowledge, motive and intent relating to the crimes charged, here the introduction of evidence relating to Lynn's handling of complaints against 21 priests in addition to the two priests whose actions Lynn was charged with covering up went too far.  The majority said in part:

The potential for this evidence to unfairly prejudice Appellant was high, both because it involved the sexually abusive acts of numerous priests committed against children over several decades, and because of the high volume of the evidence admitted. Therefore, we conclude that the probative value of that evidence, in toto, did not outweigh its potential for unfair prejudice, and that this potential prejudice was not overcome by the trial court’s cautionary instructions.

Judge Donohue filed a dissenting opinion, saying in part:

The record supports a finding that both Lynn and his predecessors handled prior allegations of sexual abuse against other priests with the motive and intent of shielding the Church from scandal. Thus, there is support for the conclusion that the way Lynn handled the allegations of abuse made against Avery and Brennan “grew out of” and was “caused by” the way Lynn’s predecessors and Lynn himself handled past allegations of sexual abuse committed by other priests.

Philadelphia Inquirer reports on the decision. [Thanks to How Appealing for the lead.]

Suit Challenges Maine's Restriction On Loud Preaching Outside of Abortion Clinic

In Portland, Maine this week, a Christian pastor filed suit in federal district court challenging the constitutionality of a Maine statute designed to protect abortion facilities.  The law essentially prohibits demonstrating outside an abortion clinic with noise loud enough to be heard inside.  The complaint (full text) in March v. Mills, (D ME, filed 12/21/2015), contends that the statute violates plaintiff's 1st and 14th Amendment rights by targeting his religious, Christian, Pro-Life messages. He alleges in part:

Plaintiff considers it his vocation to encourage women to avoid the sin of abortion and to help them repent from their previous sins.... Plaintiff preaches outside of the abortion facility in order to better reach these women and to give women a last-chance alternative to their life-ending decision.

The suit claims that the restriction on his speech is a content-based prior restraint.  Thomas More Law Center issued a press release announcing the filing of the suit.

FFRF's Secular Nativity Display Removed From Texas Capitol After It Provokes Ire of Governor

The Texas State Preservation Board has a policy that allows displays in public areas of the Capitol upon filing of an appropriate application and a letter of sponsorship from the governor, lieutenant governor or a member of the state legislature.  Receiving approval of its application, on December 18 the Freedom From Religion Foundation put up a Bill of Rights Nativity display which it describes as:

featur[ing] Founding Fathers Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington gathered in reverence before the Bill of Rights, overseen by the Statue of Liberty. In addition to the "nativity," the display also features a sign celebrating the Winter Solstice.

However, three days later the exhibit was removed after Governor Greg Abbott expressed strong opposition to it.  In a letter (full text) to the Executive Director of the State Preservation Board, the governor (who is Chairman of the Board) contended that the display did not meet the requirement that approved displays promote a "public purpose."  He wrote in part:

[T]he exhibit deliberately mocks Christians and Christianity. The Biblical scene of the newly born Jesus Christ lying in a manger in Bethlehem lies at the very heart of the Christian faith. Subjecting an image held sacred by millions of Texans to the Foundation’s tasteless sarcasm does nothing to promote morals and the general welfare. To the contrary, the Foundation’s spiteful message is intentionally designed to belittle and offend....

This is not an exhibit that spreads a secular message in an effort to educate the public about nonreligious viewpoints; it instead denigrates religious views held by others.... [T]he exhibit promotes ignorance and falsehood insofar as it suggests that George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson worshipped (or would worship) the bill of rights in the place of Jesus.

Kentucky's New Governor Eliminates County Clerks' Names From Marriage License Forms

Kentucky's new Republican governor, Matt Bevin, fulfilled a campaign promise yesterday (press release) by issuing Executive Order 2015-048 instructing the Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives to distribute to all County Clerks a marriage license form that no longer includes the name of the County Clerk on it. Instead the form merely calls for the name and title of the issuing official-- who might be a deputy clerk.  The change was in response to the widely-followed resistance of Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis who refused on religious grounds to allow her office to authorize same-sex marriage licenses. (See prior posting.) In a press release, Liberty Counsel call the new form "a clear, simple accommodation on behalf of Kim Davis and all Kentucky clerks."

Court Invokes Ecclesiastical Abstention To Dismiss Church Members' Claims of Financial Mismanagement

In Harrison v. Bishop, (OH App., Dec. 18, 2015), an Ohio appellate court applied the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine to dismiss a suit brought by three members of the Mt. Pilgrim Baptist Church against directors and the senior pastor of the church.  The plaintiffs claimed that defendants breached their duties under the church's constitution by mismanaging the church's finances, wrongfully withholding financial statements and refusing to permit members to examine the church's books and records. The court said in part:

Appellants cite select provisions in the Constitution that they allege give rise to appellees’ duties....  While it is true that the Constitution contains apparently secular provisions, we cannot view those provisions in isolation, thereby ignoring the ecclesiastical content that is found throughout the document. In view of the patently religious nature of the church’s Constitution, we find that reliance upon provisions within the Constitution for determination of the rights and responsibilities of the parties in this case, under auspices of “neutral principles of law,” would necessarily entangle the trial court in ecclesiastical issues over which the court has no subject matter jurisdiction under the First and Fourteenth Amendments....

Further, we find that appellants, in filing this action, are essentially seeking to utilize the power of the civil courts to institute the termination and replacement of the church’s leadership.

New Zealand Approves Pastafarians To Perform Marriage Ceremonies

A Notice published in the Dec. 10 New Zealand Government Gazette approved the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster as an organization that qualifies under Sec. 9 of the Marriage Act 1955 to nominate persons to solemnize marriages.  To qualify under the statute, "one of the principal objects of the organisation" must be "to uphold or promote religious beliefs or philosophical or humanitarian convictions." The Freethinker reports on the decision to allow the group, whose followers are known as "Pastafarians" to perform wedding ceremonies. [Thanks to Paul de Mello for the lead.]

Two District Courts Refuse To Enjoin California's Reproductive FACT Act

In recent days, two separate California federal district courts have refused to enjoin the Jan. 1 effectiveness of California's new Reproductive FACT Act which requires reproductive health clinics to disseminate a notice to all clients stating that California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services, prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible women. In Livingwell Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Harris, (ND CA, Dec. 18, 2015), the court denied a preliminary injunction, finding that plaintiffs had not shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim that the required disclosures violate their free expression rights by interfering with their ability to control their own religious and pro-life messages. In A Woman's Friend Pregnancy Resource Clinic v. Harris, (ED CA, Dec. 21, 2015), the court similarly rejected free expression and free exercise claims in denying a preliminary injunction. In rejecting the free exercise claim, the court found that the Act is a neutral law of general applicability even though it mostly impacts Christian-belief based crisis pregnancy centers. Courthouse News Service reports on the decisions.

European Court Says Switzerland Need Not Recognize Underage Religious Marriage of Afghan Nationals

In Z.H. and R.H. v. Switzerland, (ECHR, Dec. 8, 2015), the European Court of Human Rights in a Chamber Judgment held that Switzerland was not required for asylum purposes to recognize the religious marriage between first cousins, entered when the bride was only 14 years old.  The religious marriage between the two, who are Afghan nationals, would have been illegal in Afghanistan because a woman must be at least 15 years old to marry there.  The religious marriage was contracted in Iran where the couple was living illegally, but it was not registered with Iranian authorities. The couple subsequently applied for asylum in Switzerland which they had entered illegally from Italy. Refusing to recognize them as husband and wife, authorities removed the husband to Italy.  However he soon returned illegally to Switzerland where apparently then Switzerland decided to recognize the marriage once the woman turned 17. The European Court did not treat this as mooting the appeal to it of Switzerland's initial decision.

Fired Pastor and His Followers Lose Suit To Reclaim Their Former Church Building

In St. Mark Baptist Church of Pittsburg v. Saint Mark at Bethel Missionary Baptist Church, (CA App., Dec. 18, 2015), a California state appellate court upheld a trial court's decision in a dispute over control of church property.  Two Baptist churches merged, but the arrangement went sour after two years.  Under the merger agreement,  Pastor McNab from St. Mark Pittsburg was to be the pastor of the merged church, but the church was to meet in the building used by St. Mark at Bethel. When trustees of the merged church voted to terminate Pastor McNab, he and some of his followers left the church and attempted to return to their original building which had by now been rented out to an unrelated church. They sued seeking a ruling that they, not the merged church, still owned their original building.  In this decision, the Court of Appeals upheld the trial court's denial of a preliminary injunction to prevent sale of the St. Mark Pittsburg church building by the merged church, and also upheld the trial court's removal of a lis pendis notice-- a notice that litigation impacting the property was pending. It held that there was substantial evidence that McNab and his current followers were not the rightful leaders of St. Mark Pittsburg even if it continues to exist as a separate entity.

Slovenia Rejects Same-Sex Marriage In Referendum

In a referendum in the central European nation of Slovenia yesterday, voters by a margin of 63% to 37% rejected same-sex marriage.  Politco reports that the overall voter turnout for the referendum was only 35.6%.  This defeat of a bill passed by Parliament last March returns the country to its old rules that allow civil partnership but not adoption of children by same-sex couples. [Thanks to Paul de Mello for the lead.]

2016 Appropriations Act Includes Focus On International Religious Liberty

The massive Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 signed into law by President Obama last week includes a number of provisions specifically relating to international religious freedom.  These provision in Section 7033 (at pg. 519 of the bill) are of particular interest:

(c) INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING.—Funds appropriated by this Act under the heading ‘‘Broadcasting Board of Governors, International Broadcasting Operations’’ shall be made available for programs related to international religious freedom, including reporting on the condition of vulnerable and persecuted religious groups.

(d) ATROCITIES PREVENTION.—Not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, after consultation with the heads of other United States Government agencies represented on the Atrocities Prevention Board (APB) and representatives of human rights organizations, as appropriate, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an evaluation of the persecution of, including attacks against, Christians and people of other religions in the Middle East by violent Islamic extremists and the Muslim Rohingya people in Burma by violent Buddhist extremists, including whether either situation constitutes mass atrocities or genocide (as defined in section 1091 of title 18, United States Code), and a detailed description of any proposed atrocities prevention response recommended by the APB: Provided, That such evaluation and response may include a classified annex, if necessary.

(e) DESIGNATION OF NON-STATE ACTORS.—The President shall, concurrent with the annual foreign country review required by section 402(b)(1) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6442(b)(1)), review and identify any non-state actors in such countries that have engaged in particularly severe violations of religious freedom, and designate, in a manner consistent with such Act, each such group as a non-state actor of particular concern for religious freedom operating in such reviewed country or surrounding region: Provided, That whenever the President designates such a non-state actor under this subsection, the President shall, as soon as practicable after the designation is made, submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees detailing the reasons for such designation.

Suit Against Jewish Conversion Therapy Group Ends With Permanent Injunction and Settlement Instead of Appeal

As previously reported, in June a New Jersey state trial court jury awarded treble damages of $72,400 to a total of five plaintiffs who sued JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing), its founder and a counselor under the state's consumer fraud law. JONAH provided "conversion therapy" that it falsely claimed could change an individual from gay to straight.  Instead of appealing the decision, defendants entered a confidential settlement agreement (Stipulation) under which defendants are to pay an undisclosed amount of damages and attorneys' fees of $3500.  In addition the parties agreed to the award of a permanent injunction requiring JONAH to cease operations and liquidate.  The Court issued a consent Order on Dec. 18 (full text) implementing this agreement, including permanently enjoining defendants from offering any kind of conversion therapy in the future. CBS News reports on these developments and points out that New Jersey's 2013 law banning licensed therapists from offering sexual orientation change therapy for minors was not involved in the case because the defendants were not licensed therapists. An attorney who represented JONAH said:

It is sad that so many are celebrating the government's power to stop willing clients from working with willing counselors to lead their lives on Biblical principles.

Attorneys for plaintiffs responded, however:

The practice of conversion therapy, at base, constitutes fraud. It is premised on the lie that homosexuality is a disease or disorder. This case proved it to be a lie.

Southern Poverty Law Center's case page has links to all the pleadings and court orders in the case.

New York City Will Reimburse Private Religious Schools For Security Guards

The Forward last week reported that New York's City Council earlier this month passed legislation to reimburse all nonpublic schools with 300 or more students for unarmed security guards they hire.  The number of guards tor which they will be entitled to reimbursement depends on the size of the school.  Guards must be hired from a list of firms approved by the city, and they must be paid a prevailing wage.  This is part of a growing list of non-religious items  for which religiously affiliated private schools can obtain government funds.  The City will spend up to $19.8 million on the guards in the first year of the program.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Samuel J. Levine, A Critique of Hobby Lobby and the Supreme Court's Hands-Off Approach to Religion, (Notre Dame L. Rev. Online 26 (2015)).
• Steven Douglas Smith, The Tortuous Course of Religious Freedom, (Notre Dame Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Aliza Cover, Archetypes of Faith: How Americans See, and Believe in, Their Constitution, (Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 26, No. 555, 2015).
• Thomas M. Keck, Hate Speech and Double Standards, (Constitutional Studies 1:1 (Fall 2015)).
• Angela D. Morrison, Misconstruing Notice in EEOC Administrative Processing & Conciliation, (Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 14, p. 785-805, 2014).

From SSRN (Non-U.S. Law):

• Nicola Carr, Paula Devine, Siobhan McAlister & Gail Neill, Public Attitudes Towards LGB Equality, (Access Research Knowledge, No 106, 2015).
• Pietro Faraguna, Regulating Religion in Italy: The Constitution Does (Not) Matter, (December 14, 2015).
• Piotr Godzisz, Forgotten Friends. ODIHR and Civil Society in the Struggle to Counter Hate Crime in Poland, (2015).
• Michael J. T. McMillen, Legal and Regulatory Considerations Pertaining to Islamic Capital Markets, (Islamic Capital Markets, Simon Archer and Rifaat Ahmed Abdel Karim, eds. Forthcoming).
• Tipu Salman Makhdoom, Enigmatic Sex Laws of Pakistan, (December 15, 2015).
• Saadiah Mohamad, et. al., Enhancing Cross Border Connectivity: Venturing into Islamic Finance as a New Source of Infrastructure Financing, (Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, Vol.3, No.3 (2015)).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:

• Yousef T. Jabareen, The Arab-Palestinian Community in Israel: A Test Case for Collective Rights under International Law, 47 George Washington International Law Review 449-480 (2015).
• Charles J. Russo, Mergens v. Westside Community Schools at Twenty-Five and Christian Legal Society v. Martinez: From Live and Let Live to My Way or the Highway?, 2015 BYU Education and Law Journal 453-480.
• Kristen Stilt, Contextualizing Constitutional Islam: The Malayan Experience, [Abstract], 13 I.Con: International Journal of Constitutional Law 407-433 (2015).
• Fatahillah Abdul Syukur & Dale Margaret Bagshaw, Victim-Offender Mediation with Youth Offenders in Indonesia, [Abstract], 32 Conflict Resolution Quarterly 389-411 (2015).
• Journal of Law & Religion, Vol. 30, No. 1 (2015) has recently appeared.
• Andrea M. Alonso & Kevin G. Faley, Pope’s New Rule on Annulment: Will the Law Keep Up?, New York Law Journal, Dec. 18, 2015.
• SCOTUSblog's Zubik v. Burwell Symposium, (Dec. 2015).

U.N. Recognizes Yom Kippur As Holiday

According to the Times of Israel, the United Nations announced on Thursday that it was adding the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur to the list of officially recognized U.N. holidays on which no official meetings will be scheduled and staff will not be required to report to work. The U.N. already observes Christmas, Good Friday, Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha as holidays, along with six secular U.S. holidays. The U.N. move had important symbolic importance.  Israeli ambassador to the U.N. Danny Danon (who along with U.S. Ambassador Samantha Powers) led the move to add Yom Kippur, said: "Today we finally have an official place for the Jewish religion in the World’s parliament."